cost accounting standards part iii: the cost assignment ... · pdf filegovernment contracting...
TRANSCRIPT
1government contracting
Cost Accounting StandardsPart III: The Cost Assignment and
Measurement Standards
Bill Walter, Partner
2government contracting
Agenda
• Session I – Administration:
– CAS Overview
– Applicability
– Types of Coverage
– CAS Administration
• Part II - The Cost Allocation Standards
• Part III - The Cost Assignment and
Measurement Standards
• Part IV - The CAS Disclosure Statement
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
3government contracting
A Quick Review – Part I
• Contracts, not contractors, are subject to
CAS!
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
Contract Subject to
CAS?
Modified vs. Full
Disclosure Statement
10 Exemptions listed in 9903.201-1(b)
$50 million threshold
Full – yes – Modified - maybe
4government contracting
Legal Decision – Materiality and CAS
• Raytheon Company, Space and Airborne Systems, ASBCA No. 58608 (August 19, 2016)
– The ASBCA held that the CO had abused her discretion by failing to consider all the materiality factors listed in FAR 9903.305 in determining whether increased costs to the government resulting from an accounting practice change were material.
– FAR 30.602 states that if a contractor proposes to make a unilateral accounting practice change, the contracting officer will follow certain procedures in FAR Part 30 if the change has a material impact
– In determining whether the impact is material, contracting officers are to follow FAR 9903.305, which lists several factors to consider in determining materiality, one of which is the absolute dollar amount involved.
– Raytheon contended that the cost increase to the government was immaterial
– The ACO determined the increase to be material because of the dollar amount of the overpayment.
– The Board observed that the dollar impact per contract was only approximately $34 a year.
– Board’s analysis of the interplay between what it called the “four headed monster”:
• the CAS statute
• the CAS Board rules
• FAR contract clauses and
• FAR Part 30.
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
5government contracting
The “Cost Assignment and Measurement” – Cost Accounting
Standards
6government contracting
The Format of the Standards
• Purpose (.20)
• Definitions (.30)
• Fundamental Requirement (.40)
• Techniques for Application (.50)
• Illustrations (.60)
• Interpretation (.61)
• Exemption (.62)
• Effective Date (.63)
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
7government contracting
Asset Accounting Standards
• CAS 404 - Capitalization
• CAS 409 - Depreciation
• CAS 417 - Self constructed assets
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
8government contracting
CAS 404, Capitalization of Tangible Assets
• Requires a written policy for capitalization
• Minimum service life of 2 years and $5,000
• Define asset accountability units
• Different criteria allowed for initial complement provided that it is reasonable
• Asset value includes cost of putting into service
• Special requirements for business combinations
• Effective date: April 15, 1996 or first full fiscal year after receipt of a covered contract
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
9government contracting
Excelis, Inc., ASBCA No. 60131 (8/29/16)
• A dispute centered on whether the lease of a building should be
treated as a capital lease or an operating lease
– Excelis argued that the lease was an operating lease, but the government
determined that the lease was a capital lease
– The government claimed that Excelis was in non-compliance with CAS 404
– The Board stated that it interprets contract terms, including incorporated CAS, in
accordance with their plain terms.
• CAS 404 deals with tangible assets
– ASBCA held that the asset was the lease - an intangible asset, not the building.
– Since the asset in question was an intangible asset, CAS 404 did not apply.
• No recovery from Excelis for CAS non-compliance
• FAR 31.205-11 was also at issue in Excelis and is based in substantial part on
CAS 404 and makes specific reference to the CAS. Since the present decision
dealt with a procedural issue, the Board did not rule on whether the
government was entitled to any recovery under the cost principle.
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
10government contracting
CAS 409, Depreciation of Tangible Capital Assets
• Depreciable base = capitalized cost - residual value
• Estimated useful life must approximate the pattern of consumption of the asset
• Direct only if charges are based on usage and all assets of that class are treated the same
• Gain or loss charged or credited to the same pool that was charged for the depreciation
• Effective date: April 15, 1996 or first full fiscal year after receipt of a covered contract
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
11government contracting
CAS 417, Cost of Money as an Element
of the Cost of Capital Assets Under Construction
• The cost of money associated with self
constructed assets will be included in the
capitalized acquisition cost of the asset
• Secretary of the Treasury interest rate is
used to compute the amount to be
capitalized
• Effective date: The first full fiscal year after
receipt of a covered contract
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
12government contracting
Compensation Standards
• CAS 408 - Compensated absences
• CAS 412 & 413 - Pensions
• CAS 415 - Deferred compensation
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
13government contracting
CAS 408, Accounting for Costs of Compensated
Personal Absence
• The cost of compensated personal
absences will be allocated to the cost
accounting period in which the entitlement
is earned
• The cost for an entire accounting period
will be allocated pro-rata to all final cost
objectives
• Effective date: Next full cost accounting
period after a covered contract is received
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
14government contracting
CAS 412, Composition and Measurement of
Pension Cost
• Components of defined benefit plan– normal cost of the period
– a part of any unfunded actuarial liability
– an interest equivalent on the unamortized portion of any unfunded actuarial liability
– an adjustment for actuarial gains and losses
• Components of a defined benefit plan is the contribution made for that period
• The amount of pension cost for defined benefit plan shall be determined by the use of an immediate-gain actuarial cost method
• The amount of pension costs for a cost accounting period are assignable only to that period
• Costs are allocable to the extent that they are funded
• Effective date: March 30, 1995 - Next cost accounting period
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
15government contracting
CAS 413, Adjustment and
Allocation of Pension Cost
• Actuarial gains and losses will be calculated
annually and will be assigned to the cost
accounting period for which the actuarial
valuation is made
• Asset valuation method has to consider
unrealized appreciation and depreciation
• Pension costs shall be allocated to segments
that have participants in the pension plan
• Effective date: March 30, 1995 - Start of next
cost accounting period
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
16government contracting
CAS 415, Accounting for the
Cost of Deferred Compensation
• Deferred compensation recognized in the
period in which the employer incurs an
obligation to pay
• If no obligation to pay the deferred
compensation will be recognized when paid
• The measurement of deferred compensation
is the present value of the future payments to
be paid by the contractor
• Effective date: The first full fiscal year after
receipt of a covered contract
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
17government contracting
Other Standards
• CAS 411 - Material Costs
• CAS 416 - Insurance Costs
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
18government contracting
CAS 411, Accounting for Acquisition
Costs of Material
• Requires written policies and procedures
• The cost material can be directly charged
provided the cost objective was
specifically identified at the time of
purchase or production
• Same costing method shall be used within
the same business unit for similar
categories of material
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
19government contracting
CAS 416, Accounting for Insurance Costs
• The amount of insurance cost to be
assigned to a cost accounting period is the
projected average loss for the period plus
insurance administrative costs
• Insurance costs are to be allocated to cost
objectives on a causal or beneficial
relationship
• Effective date: The first full fiscal year after
receipt of a covered contract
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
20government contracting
Questions & Answers
21government contracting
Bill Walter
©2017 Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP
Bill Walter, CPA
PartnerGovernment Contract Advisory Practice
Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP1410 Spring Hill Road, Suite 500
Tysons, VA 22102
D. 703.970.0509