cosmic ray mu on

Upload: pj0204

Post on 14-Apr-2018

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    1/38

    Cosmic Ray Muon Detection

    Department of Physics and Space Sciences

    Florida Institute of Technology

    Georgia Karagiorgi

    Julie Slanker

    Advisor: Dr. M. Hohlmann

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    2/38

    Cosmic Ray Muons

    p+ -> m+ + nm

    p- -> m- +`nm

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    3/38

    Main goals Equipment setup

    Muon flux measurement

    Investigation of flux variation with

    Altitude

    Zenith angle

    Cardinal points

    Overlap area

    Investigation of count rate variation with

    Overlap area Separation distance between the paddles

    Investigation of doubles flux with zenith angle

    Muon lifetime experiment

    Air shower experiment

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    4/38

    Equipment

    2 scintillation detectorsdeveloped at Fermilab

    2 PMT tubes

    2 PM bases

    2 Coincidence logicboards (version 1 andversion2)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    5/38

    Scintillation Detectors

    A scintillation detector has the property to emit a small flashof light (i.e. a scintillation) when it is struck by ionizingradiation.

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    6/38

    Setup

    The setup is such that the counter on the DAQ board and the computer

    are recording coincidences, i.e. signals sent from both detectors at

    the same time

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    7/38

    DAQ board resolving time

    for coincidences = 160ns

    This technique

    Results in elimination

    of background noise

    Offers a great number

    of possible

    experiments

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    8/38

    I. Setting up equipment

    Plateau Measurements for PMTs

    (Procedure for finding working voltage)

    Example of a plateau curve:

    Plateau

    Onset of regeneration

    effects (afterpulsing,

    discharges, etc)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    9/38

    Plateau measurements

    For coincidences

    Coincidence Plateau (superimposed)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    6.80 7.80 8.80 9.80

    HV#13 (dial units)

    Counts/2mins

    HV#14 = 7.00

    HV#14 = 7.20

    HV#14 = 7.40

    HV#14 = 7.60

    HV#14 = 7.80

    HV#14 = 8.00

    HV#14 = 8.20

    HV#14 = 8.40

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    10/38

    Plateau measurements

    For coincidences

    Coincidence Plateau (superimposed)

    050

    100

    150

    200

    250300

    350

    6.80 7.30 7.80 8.30 8.80

    HV#14 (dial units)

    Counts/2mins

    HV#13 = 7.00

    HV#13 = 7.20

    HV#13 = 7.40

    HV#13 = 7.60

    HV#13 = 7.80

    HV#13 = 8.00

    HV#13 = 8.20

    HV#13 = 8.40

    HV#13 = 8.60

    HV#13 = 8.80

    HV#13 = 9.00

    HV#13 = 9.20

    HV#13 = 9.40

    HV#13 = 9.60

    HV#13 = 9.80

    HV#13 = 10.00

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    11/38

    II. Flux

    Muons reach the surface of the Earth with typically constant flux F.

    (count rate)d2

    F = (area of top panel)(area of bottom panel)

    F = 0.48 cm-2min-1sterad-1 (PDG theoretical value)

    Count rate: 0.585cm-2min-1(horizontal detectors)

    Our experimental value: 36min-1 (8% efficiency)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    12/38

    With altitude

    We collected data on the 7 different floors of Crawford building, on the

    FIT campus

    All measurements were taken at a same specific location on each floor,

    except for the one on floor 7.

    III. Investigation of flux variation

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    13/38

    With altitude

    Results:

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    Flux vs. floor level

    0

    0.0005

    0.001

    0.0015

    0.002

    0.0025

    0.003

    0.0035

    0.004

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    floor

    flux(count/min.cm^2.s

    terad)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    14/38

    With zenith angle

    Expected result:

    F ~ cos2

    III. Investigation of flux variation

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    15/38

    With zenith angle

    Rotation mount for support of the setup:

    III. Investigation of flux variation

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    16/38

    With zenith angle Results:

    (7th floor Crawford)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    Flux vs. zenith angle

    0

    0.0005

    0.001

    0.0015

    0.002

    0.0025

    0.003

    0.0035

    0.004

    -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150

    zenith angle (degrees)

    Flux(count/min.cm^2.s

    terad)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    17/38

    With zenith angle Results:

    (7th floor Crawford)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    Flux vs. cosine squared of zenith angle (expect lin. dependence)

    0

    0.0005

    0.001

    0.0015

    0.002

    0.0025

    0.003

    0.0035

    0.004

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    cosine squared of zenith angle (degrees)

    Flux(count/min.cm^2.s

    terad)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    18/38

    With zenith angle Results:

    (Observatory)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    flux vs.

    0

    0.0005

    0.001

    0.0015

    0.002

    0.0025

    0.003

    0.0035

    0.004

    -100 -50 0 50 100

    (degrees)

    flux(count/

    min.cm^2.s

    terad

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    19/38

    With zenith angle Results:

    (Observatory)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    flux vs. (cos)^2

    0

    0.0005

    0.001

    0.0015

    0.002

    0.0025

    0.003

    0.0035

    0.004

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    (cos)^2

    flux(count/min.cm^2.s

    terad

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    20/38

    With cardinal points

    Results:

    (Senior Lab)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    (total) count rate with azimuthal angle

    EW rotation

    0.00

    0.501.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    3.50

    -100 -50 0 50 100

    angle (degrees)

    coun

    trate(min^-1)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    21/38

    With cardinal points

    Results:

    (Senior Lab)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    (total) count rate with cosine squared of azimuthal

    angle

    EW rotation

    0.00

    1.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200

    cos^2()

    countrate(min^-1)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    22/38

    With cardinal points

    Results:

    (Senior Lab)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    (total) count rate with azimuthal angle

    NS rotation

    0.00

    1.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    -100 -50 0 50 100

    angle (degrees)

    coun

    trate(min^-1)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    23/38

    With cardinal points

    Results:

    (Senior Lab)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    (total) count rate with cosine squared of azimuthal

    angle

    NS rotation

    0.00

    1.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200

    cos^2()

    countrate(min^-1)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    24/38

    With cardinal points

    Results:

    (Senior Lab)

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    Superimposed count rate for NS and EW rotation

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    3.50

    4.00

    -100 -50 0 50 100

    zenith angle (degrees)

    countra

    te(counts/min)

    EW rotation

    NS rotation

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    25/38

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    With overlap area

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    26/38

    With overlap areaResults:

    III. Investigation of flux variation

    flux vs. overlap area

    0

    0.0015

    0.003

    0.0045

    0.006

    0.0075

    0.009

    0.0105

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    % overlap

    flux(co

    unt/min.cm^2.s

    terad)

    Series1

    Series2

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    27/38

    IV. Investigation of count rate variation

    With overlap areaResults:

    count rate vs. overlap area (min separation distance)

    y = 0.2971x + 1.4425R

    2= 0.9938

    y = 0.2575x + 1.5875

    R2 = 0.99980

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    3035

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    % overlap

    coun

    trate(min^-1)

    Series1

    Series2

    Linear (Series1)

    Linear (Series2)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    28/38

    IV. Investigation of count rate variation

    With separation distance d between the two paddlesExpected results: count rate is proportional to stereo angle viewed

    along a specific direction

    stereo angle vs. d

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    0 2 4 6 8

    d (in multiples of l)

    stereoangle

    (*s

    terad)

    Values calculatedusing Mathematicaintegral output

    Rectangular

    arrangement;top/bottom phase

    constant (lxl); d

    varies (multiples of l)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    29/38

    IV. Investigation of count rate variation

    With separation distance d between the two paddlesResults:

    count rate (about vertical direction) vs. separation dis tance d

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    distance d (cm)

    counts/min

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    30/38

    Using the DAQ v.1 board, we recorded low energy

    (decaying) muon events on the computer.

    These events are called doubles.

    V.Investigation of doubles flux variation

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    31/38

    With zenith angle Results:

    (Observatory)

    V.Investigation of doubles flux variation

    data plot for double hits at different angles

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    -100 -50 0 50 100

    angle (degrees)

    # of doubles

    % of doubles

    total # of hits

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    32/38

    We collected data of double events

    We plotted tdecay of an initial sample N0 of low energy muons

    We fit the data to an exponential curve of the form: N(t) = N0e^(-t/T);

    where T = muon lifetime

    VI. Muon lifetime experiment

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    33/38

    Results:

    y = -63.856 + 616.791e-0.4552x

    Lifetime T:

    T = 2.1965s

    Tth= 2.1970s

    VI. Muon lifetime experiment

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    34/38

    Results:

    y = 14.7029 + 1493.09e-0.4601x

    Lifetime T:

    T = 2.1733s

    Tth

    = 2.1970s

    VI. Muon lifetime experiment

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    35/38

    Results:

    Lifetime T:

    T = 2.1422s

    Tth

    = 2.1970s

    VI. Muon lifetime experiment (verification)

    N(t) = No e^(-t/T)y = 696.16e-0.4668x

    R2 = 0.996

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    0 5 10 15 20

    time t (microseconds)

    N(t)(sample) noise level

    N(t) before noise

    subtraction

    Expon. (N(t) before

    noise subtraction)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    36/38

    Results:

    Lifetime T:

    T = 2.1678s

    Tth

    = 2.1970s

    VI. Muon lifetime experiment (verification)

    N(t) = No e^(-t/T) [after noise subtraction]

    y = 465.2e-0.4613x

    R2 = 0.9795

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    0 5 10 15 20

    time t (microseconds)

    N(t)(remainingsam

    ple)

    after noise subtraction

    Expon. (af ter noise

    subtraction)

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    37/38

    In progress

    Make use of:

    DAQ v.2 boardGPS option

    Another 5 detector setups assembled

    during QuarkNet

    IX. Air shower experiment

  • 7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On

    38/38

    References

    http://pdg.lbl.gov/2002/cosmicrayrpp.pdf

    http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmicrays/crdctour.html

    http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/astrophysics/muon/

    http://pdg.lbl.gov/2002/cosmicrayrpp.pdfhttp://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmicrays/crdctour.htmlhttp://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/astrophysics/muon/http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/astrophysics/muon/http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmicrays/crdctour.htmlhttp://pdg.lbl.gov/2002/cosmicrayrpp.pdf