cosmic ray mu on
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
1/38
Cosmic Ray Muon Detection
Department of Physics and Space Sciences
Florida Institute of Technology
Georgia Karagiorgi
Julie Slanker
Advisor: Dr. M. Hohlmann
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
2/38
Cosmic Ray Muons
p+ -> m+ + nm
p- -> m- +`nm
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
3/38
Main goals Equipment setup
Muon flux measurement
Investigation of flux variation with
Altitude
Zenith angle
Cardinal points
Overlap area
Investigation of count rate variation with
Overlap area Separation distance between the paddles
Investigation of doubles flux with zenith angle
Muon lifetime experiment
Air shower experiment
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
4/38
Equipment
2 scintillation detectorsdeveloped at Fermilab
2 PMT tubes
2 PM bases
2 Coincidence logicboards (version 1 andversion2)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
5/38
Scintillation Detectors
A scintillation detector has the property to emit a small flashof light (i.e. a scintillation) when it is struck by ionizingradiation.
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
6/38
Setup
The setup is such that the counter on the DAQ board and the computer
are recording coincidences, i.e. signals sent from both detectors at
the same time
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
7/38
DAQ board resolving time
for coincidences = 160ns
This technique
Results in elimination
of background noise
Offers a great number
of possible
experiments
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
8/38
I. Setting up equipment
Plateau Measurements for PMTs
(Procedure for finding working voltage)
Example of a plateau curve:
Plateau
Onset of regeneration
effects (afterpulsing,
discharges, etc)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
9/38
Plateau measurements
For coincidences
Coincidence Plateau (superimposed)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
6.80 7.80 8.80 9.80
HV#13 (dial units)
Counts/2mins
HV#14 = 7.00
HV#14 = 7.20
HV#14 = 7.40
HV#14 = 7.60
HV#14 = 7.80
HV#14 = 8.00
HV#14 = 8.20
HV#14 = 8.40
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
10/38
Plateau measurements
For coincidences
Coincidence Plateau (superimposed)
050
100
150
200
250300
350
6.80 7.30 7.80 8.30 8.80
HV#14 (dial units)
Counts/2mins
HV#13 = 7.00
HV#13 = 7.20
HV#13 = 7.40
HV#13 = 7.60
HV#13 = 7.80
HV#13 = 8.00
HV#13 = 8.20
HV#13 = 8.40
HV#13 = 8.60
HV#13 = 8.80
HV#13 = 9.00
HV#13 = 9.20
HV#13 = 9.40
HV#13 = 9.60
HV#13 = 9.80
HV#13 = 10.00
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
11/38
II. Flux
Muons reach the surface of the Earth with typically constant flux F.
(count rate)d2
F = (area of top panel)(area of bottom panel)
F = 0.48 cm-2min-1sterad-1 (PDG theoretical value)
Count rate: 0.585cm-2min-1(horizontal detectors)
Our experimental value: 36min-1 (8% efficiency)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
12/38
With altitude
We collected data on the 7 different floors of Crawford building, on the
FIT campus
All measurements were taken at a same specific location on each floor,
except for the one on floor 7.
III. Investigation of flux variation
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
13/38
With altitude
Results:
III. Investigation of flux variation
Flux vs. floor level
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
floor
flux(count/min.cm^2.s
terad)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
14/38
With zenith angle
Expected result:
F ~ cos2
III. Investigation of flux variation
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
15/38
With zenith angle
Rotation mount for support of the setup:
III. Investigation of flux variation
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
16/38
With zenith angle Results:
(7th floor Crawford)
III. Investigation of flux variation
Flux vs. zenith angle
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150
zenith angle (degrees)
Flux(count/min.cm^2.s
terad)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
17/38
With zenith angle Results:
(7th floor Crawford)
III. Investigation of flux variation
Flux vs. cosine squared of zenith angle (expect lin. dependence)
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
cosine squared of zenith angle (degrees)
Flux(count/min.cm^2.s
terad)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
18/38
With zenith angle Results:
(Observatory)
III. Investigation of flux variation
flux vs.
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
-100 -50 0 50 100
(degrees)
flux(count/
min.cm^2.s
terad
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
19/38
With zenith angle Results:
(Observatory)
III. Investigation of flux variation
flux vs. (cos)^2
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
0.0035
0.004
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
(cos)^2
flux(count/min.cm^2.s
terad
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
20/38
With cardinal points
Results:
(Senior Lab)
III. Investigation of flux variation
(total) count rate with azimuthal angle
EW rotation
0.00
0.501.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
-100 -50 0 50 100
angle (degrees)
coun
trate(min^-1)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
21/38
With cardinal points
Results:
(Senior Lab)
III. Investigation of flux variation
(total) count rate with cosine squared of azimuthal
angle
EW rotation
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200
cos^2()
countrate(min^-1)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
22/38
With cardinal points
Results:
(Senior Lab)
III. Investigation of flux variation
(total) count rate with azimuthal angle
NS rotation
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
-100 -50 0 50 100
angle (degrees)
coun
trate(min^-1)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
23/38
With cardinal points
Results:
(Senior Lab)
III. Investigation of flux variation
(total) count rate with cosine squared of azimuthal
angle
NS rotation
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200
cos^2()
countrate(min^-1)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
24/38
With cardinal points
Results:
(Senior Lab)
III. Investigation of flux variation
Superimposed count rate for NS and EW rotation
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
-100 -50 0 50 100
zenith angle (degrees)
countra
te(counts/min)
EW rotation
NS rotation
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
25/38
III. Investigation of flux variation
With overlap area
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
26/38
With overlap areaResults:
III. Investigation of flux variation
flux vs. overlap area
0
0.0015
0.003
0.0045
0.006
0.0075
0.009
0.0105
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
% overlap
flux(co
unt/min.cm^2.s
terad)
Series1
Series2
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
27/38
IV. Investigation of count rate variation
With overlap areaResults:
count rate vs. overlap area (min separation distance)
y = 0.2971x + 1.4425R
2= 0.9938
y = 0.2575x + 1.5875
R2 = 0.99980
5
10
15
20
25
3035
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
% overlap
coun
trate(min^-1)
Series1
Series2
Linear (Series1)
Linear (Series2)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
28/38
IV. Investigation of count rate variation
With separation distance d between the two paddlesExpected results: count rate is proportional to stereo angle viewed
along a specific direction
stereo angle vs. d
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 2 4 6 8
d (in multiples of l)
stereoangle
(*s
terad)
Values calculatedusing Mathematicaintegral output
Rectangular
arrangement;top/bottom phase
constant (lxl); d
varies (multiples of l)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
29/38
IV. Investigation of count rate variation
With separation distance d between the two paddlesResults:
count rate (about vertical direction) vs. separation dis tance d
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
distance d (cm)
counts/min
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
30/38
Using the DAQ v.1 board, we recorded low energy
(decaying) muon events on the computer.
These events are called doubles.
V.Investigation of doubles flux variation
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
31/38
With zenith angle Results:
(Observatory)
V.Investigation of doubles flux variation
data plot for double hits at different angles
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
-100 -50 0 50 100
angle (degrees)
# of doubles
% of doubles
total # of hits
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
32/38
We collected data of double events
We plotted tdecay of an initial sample N0 of low energy muons
We fit the data to an exponential curve of the form: N(t) = N0e^(-t/T);
where T = muon lifetime
VI. Muon lifetime experiment
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
33/38
Results:
y = -63.856 + 616.791e-0.4552x
Lifetime T:
T = 2.1965s
Tth= 2.1970s
VI. Muon lifetime experiment
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
34/38
Results:
y = 14.7029 + 1493.09e-0.4601x
Lifetime T:
T = 2.1733s
Tth
= 2.1970s
VI. Muon lifetime experiment
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
35/38
Results:
Lifetime T:
T = 2.1422s
Tth
= 2.1970s
VI. Muon lifetime experiment (verification)
N(t) = No e^(-t/T)y = 696.16e-0.4668x
R2 = 0.996
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 5 10 15 20
time t (microseconds)
N(t)(sample) noise level
N(t) before noise
subtraction
Expon. (N(t) before
noise subtraction)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
36/38
Results:
Lifetime T:
T = 2.1678s
Tth
= 2.1970s
VI. Muon lifetime experiment (verification)
N(t) = No e^(-t/T) [after noise subtraction]
y = 465.2e-0.4613x
R2 = 0.9795
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 5 10 15 20
time t (microseconds)
N(t)(remainingsam
ple)
after noise subtraction
Expon. (af ter noise
subtraction)
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
37/38
In progress
Make use of:
DAQ v.2 boardGPS option
Another 5 detector setups assembled
during QuarkNet
IX. Air shower experiment
-
7/27/2019 Cosmic Ray Mu On
38/38
References
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2002/cosmicrayrpp.pdf
http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmicrays/crdctour.html
http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/astrophysics/muon/
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2002/cosmicrayrpp.pdfhttp://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmicrays/crdctour.htmlhttp://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/astrophysics/muon/http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/astrophysics/muon/http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/cosmicrays/crdctour.htmlhttp://pdg.lbl.gov/2002/cosmicrayrpp.pdf