correlation of antero inferior glenoid bone loss with number of dislocations and mode of injury-dr....
TRANSCRIPT
Correlation of Antero-inferior Glenoid Bone Loss with Number of Dislocations and Mode
of Injury
Aravindh Palaniswamy, MS1 , Hira Lal Nag, MS1 , Dhanasekaraprabu, MS1 , Deep N Srivastava, MD2
Department of Orthopaedics1 & Radiodiagnosis2,All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Introduction
• Recurrent shoulder dislocation is a common cause of
morbidity among young adults with an annual incidence of
0.084% & 1.7%(1) .
• Natural history of the unstable shoulder evolves towards
progressive glenoid bone loss.
• Incidence as high as 86%(2) in recurrent instability.
1.Hovelius L. Incidence of shoulder dislocation in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 982:127-131.2.Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Yung PSH, Wong EMC, Yu AB, Ahuja AT, et al. Prevalence, Pattern, and Spectrum of Glenoid Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: CT Analysis of 218 Patients. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1247–54.
Introduction
• The integrity of the osseous architecture of the glenoid has
been highlighted as one of the most important factors related
to the success/failure of surgical repair(3,4).
3.Randelli P, Ragone V, Carminati S, Cabitza P. Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair a systematic review. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol.Arthrosc. 2012 Jul 27;20(11):2129–38. 4.ITOI E, LEE S-B, BERGLUND LJ, BERGE LL, AN K-N. The Effect of a Glenoid Defect on Anteroinferior Stability of the Shoulder After Bankart Repair: A Cadaveric Study*. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2000;82(1):35–46.
Introduction
• Three-dimensional reformatted computed tomography scan
images provides most accurate assessment of bone
deficiency(6).
6.MOON Shoulder Group, Bishop JY, Jones GL, Rerko MA, Donaldson C. 3-D CT is theMost Reliable Imaging Modality When Quantifying Glenoid Bone Loss. Clin.Orthop.Relat. Res. 2012 Sep 21;471(4):1251–6.
Introduction
• Glenoid bone loss – multifactorial origin(5)
– Increasing number of dislocations
– Trauma at first dislocation
– Age of first dislocation
• Considered as strong predictors for the presence and the
percentage of glenoid bone defect
5.Provencher CMT. Recurrent Shoulder Instability: Current Concepts for Evaluation andManagement of Glenoid Bone Loss. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2010 Dec 1;92(Supplement_2):133.
Study Rationale – Pre-Op CT ?
• Is it Specific findings in the history and the physical
examination provide important clues to the presence of
glenoid bone loss.
• Is it critical to evaluate all patients with recurrent shoulder
instability for the presence of osseous injuries to the glenoid.
Objectives
• To correlate the percentage of glenoid bone loss with ‘number
of dislocations’.
• To asses the influence of ‘mode of injury’ on glenoid bone loss
in patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder.
Methodology
• Type of study
– Observational Study
• Sample size
– 20 patients
• Approved by Institutional ethics committee
• Informed consent obtained
Methodology
Inclusion criteria
• Patients with recurrent
anterior shoulder
dislocation
• Unilateral involvement
• Age 15 to 45 years
Exclusion criteria
• Habitual dislocation
• H/o previous surgery for
shoulder dislocation
• Any associated congenital
anomaly
Patient Evaluation
• A detailed clinical history
– Mode of injury (Trauma/Sports Injury) which led to dislocation
– Frequency of dislocations were noted
• Physical examination for anterior apprehension & s/o
laxity
Patient Evaluation
• CT Protocol & Image Analysis
– Simultaneous CT examination of both shoulders were
acquired in MDCT scanners (Somatom sensation, Siemens,
Erlanger, Germany) with a volume data acquisition of 0.6 X
40, slice thickness of 0.6 mm with the scanning plane
extending from the acromion to just below glenoid.
Patient Evaluation
– 3D volume rendered
images were
reconstructed
– ‘En face view of
glenoid’ obtained
after subtracting
humeral head.
Patient Evaluation
• Calculation of glenoid index
– On en face view of glenoid of 3 D volume rendered image with use of built in software tools of Siemens Syngo.
– A line drawn along the long axis of glenoid & second glenoid line drawn perpendicular to the long axis of glenoid at the inferior glenoid from the posterior margin to the anterior margin
Patient Evaluation
• Calculation of glenoid bone loss
– Width of the glenoid (glenoid index) in millimetres
calculated on affected(d) and normal shoulder(D)
– Based on the glenoid linear defect method percentage of
bone loss was calculated using the formula
[ (D-d)/D] x 100
• Statistical analysis performed with statistical software (SPSS
version 19)
Results
• Mean age 26.5 ±5.9 years (range 20 to 42 years)
• Male: Female ratio 19:1
• 70% of patients (n=14) had dislocation of right shoulder
• Glenoid bone loss present in 90% (n=18) patients
• 10 patients had ≤ 10% glenoid bone loss, 5 patients between 10 and 20%, 2 between 20 and 30% while 1 patient had >30% bone loss
• Sports injury was the predominant mode of injury in 55% of patients (n=11) while trauma was implicated in rest of the patients
• No. of recurrent dislocations varied from 2 to 20 with a mean of 7.7 (± 5.7)
No. of dislocations and glenoid bone loss (%) in individual study patients
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Study patients
NO. OF DISLOCATIONS GLENOID BONE LOSS (%)
Correlation between glenoid bone loss and no. of dislocations
Spearman's rho = 0.358p=0.12
Glenoid bone loss in patients with sports injury and trauma
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Sports Injury Trauma
7.2
13.7
Gle
no
idb
on
e lo
ss (
%)
Mode of Injury
(p=0.053)
7.2 (± 9.1) 13.7 (± 7.4)
Discussion
• Anteroinferior glenoid bone loss present in 90% of patients.
• Frequency of dislocations less important in determining bone
loss(p=0.12)
• One patient with 20 episodes of dislocations had 0% of bone
loss with glenoid width measuring of 25mm and another
patient with only 5 episodes of dislocation had 24.6% of bone
loss with a glenoid width of 17.6mm
• Initial mode of injury may appear to influence the defect
(p=0.053).
Discussion
• Milano et al (7)
– Initial mode of injury or the severity of trauma of the first few
episodes and age at first dislocation are significant predictors of
glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability.
– Even though frequency of dislocations correlated with percentage of
bone loss in their study, it was largely influenced by other
confounding factors such as ‘force sustained in the initial trauma’, the
duration of the disease .
Discussion
• Griffith et al(2)
– Clear relationship between traumatic mode of injury in the initial episode of dislocation & percentage of bony bankart.
– Inverse Exponential relationship was found between the degree of anterior flattening and the number of dislocations.
– First few dislocations had a greater effect on the percentage of bone loss.
Discussion
• Yong Girl Rhee et al(8)
– Age, activity, frequency and interval of dislocation have close
relationships with the redislocation rates.
– But presence of bony Bankart lesions are unrelated to the
redislocation rates.
– It is possible that type of Bankart lesion & severity of bony Bankart
lesions are determined at first dislocation.
Conclusion
• Frequency of dislocations appeared to less important in
determining the amount of glenoid bone loss
• Initial mode of injury causing the first episode of anterior
shoulder dislocation may appear to influence the defect
Study Limitation
• Small sample size
Clinical Relevance
Adequate imaging with 3D CT should be included in routine
preoperative evaluation in patients with recurrent anterior
shoulder instability to avoid any unpleasant surprises intra
operatively
Thank you