corporate restructuring chapter 17 © 2003 south-western/thomson learning
TRANSCRIPT
Corporate Restructuring
Chapter 17
© 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning
2
Mergers and Acquisitions
Merger—any combination of two or more businesses under one ownership
Acquisition (AKA: takeover)—one firm acquires the stock of another (the takeover target)
Consolidation—all the combining firms dissolve and a new one with a new name is formed
3
Mergers and Acquisitions
Relationships A consolidation implies the firms combined willingly In an acquisition one firm acquires the other, in
either a friendly or hostile takeover
Stockholders Have to be willing to give up their shares for the
offered price The majority must approve for an acquisition to be
successful
4
Mergers and Acquisitions
Friendly Procedure The target's management approves of the deal and cooperates
with the acquiring company Negotiation occurs until an agreement is reached Proposal submitted to stockholders for a vote
• Percentage required for approval depends on corporate charter and state law
Unfriendly Procedure The target's management resists and may take defensive
measures to stop the deal Acquiring firm makes a tender offer to the target's shareholders
• A special offer to buy the stock for a fixed price contingent upon obtaining enough shares to gain control
5
Why Unfriendly Mergers are Unfriendly A target's management may resist a
takeover because The acquiring firm doesn't offer a high
enough price for the firm's stock The acquiring firm's management may lose
their jobs, power or influence
6
Economic Classification of Business Combinations Vertical Merger
When a firm acquires one of its suppliers or customers
Horizontal Merger The merging firms are competitors (reduces
competition) Conglomerate Merger
The merging firms are not in the same lines of business
7
The Antitrust Laws
U.S. is committed to maintaining a competitive economy
Antitrust laws enacted between 1890 and 1930s prohibit certain activities that can reduce the competitive nature of the economy
Mergers have the potential to reduce competition Antitrust laws limit the freedom of companies to
merge
8
The Reasons Behind Mergers
Synergies When performance as a combined entity is expected
to be better than performance as separate entities• The whole is more than the sum of its parts
Usually cost saving opportunities In practice they are hard to find and difficult to
implement Growth
Internal growth occurs when firms sell more in their current businesses
External growth occurs when a firm acquires a rival
9
The Reasons Behind Mergers
Diversification to Reduce Risk A collection of diverse businesses is generally less risky than a company
with only a single line of business Variations of the different business lines tend to offset each other
Economies of Scale A larger company can perhaps operate at a lower cost level than any of
the merging organizations can individually Guaranteed Sources and Markets
Vertical mergers can lock in a firm's sources of critical supplies or create captive markets
Acquiring Assets Cheaply A firm can sometimes acquire assets more cheaply by buying a firm that
already owns the assets then by buying the assets individually Tax Losses
Acquiring a firm with a tax loss can shelter the acquirer's earnings
10
The Reasons Behind Mergers
Ego and Empire Powerful people within an organization may
be building up their empire May mean the acquiring firm pays too high a
price for the target
11
Holding Companies
A corporation that owns other corporations called subsidiaries Holding company is known as the parent of the subsidiary
Advantages Sensible when firm would like the business operations kept
separate and distinct Generally possible to keep liabilities of subsidiaries separate
• Failure of one doesn't affect the parent or other subsidiaries Possible to control a subsidiary without owning all of its stock
• Sometimes an interest as small as 10% can effectively control a widely held corporation
• General rule: Ownership of 25% virtually guarantees control• Thus, it's possible to effectively control an organization without
spending the funds to buy the entire organization
12
The History of Merger Activity in the U.S. Wave 1: The Turn of the Century, 1897-1904
A large number of horizontal mergers transformed the U.S. into a nation of industrial giants—in many cases monopolies
• Examples: U.S. Steel (formed by the combination of 785 separate companies), Standard Oil, Eastman Kodak, American Tobacco, General Electric
Wave 2: The Roaring Twenties, 1916-1929 Began with World War I and ended with the stock
market crash of 1929 Mergers tended to be horizontal and led to oligopolies
13
The History of Merger Activity in the U.S. Wave 3: The Swinging Sixties, 1965-1969
Companies acquired firms in non-related industries (conglomerate mergers)
In many cases these mergers were driven by stock market issues rather than operating concerns
If a firm with a high P/E ratio buys a firm with a low P/E ratio and pays for the target with its own stock, the result can be an increase in combined EPS
• If the stock market attaches the acquiring firm's original P/E ratio to the new firm, a higher stock price will result
An Important Development During the 1970s Prior to 1970s hostile takeovers were unusual However, in the 1970s hostile takeovers were viewed as
acceptable
14
The History of Merger Activity in the U.S. Wave 4: Bigger and Bigger, 1981 - ?
Mergers in the 1980s and onward are characterized by the following:
• Size—large mergers have become more common• Hostility—the threat of hostile takeover now pervades corporate
life• Raiders—corporate raiders have emerged
• A financier who mounts hostile takeovers
• Defenses—strategies to combat hostile takeovers have developed
• Advisors—Investment bankers and lawyers have aggressively expanded their roles as advisors
• Financing—the junk bond market helped spur the financing for mergers
15
The History of Merger Activity in the U.S. Some Detail about Wave 4
Merger activity slackened in the early 90s after peaking in the late 80s
The junk bond market collapsed in 1989-1990 In the mid 1990s merger activity picked up again—
many mega mergers occurred Disturbing Implications
• Mega mergers can lead to reduced competition• A great deal of power over public opinion is in the hands of
a few executives
16
Merger Analysis and the Price Premium What price should an acquiring company
be willing to pay for a target firm? A merger analysis attempts to determine the
answer to this question• Acquiring firm projects the target's cash flows and
performs a standard capital budgeting analysis to determine if the investment is expected to generate a positive NPV
• Must forecast the target's cash flows• Must determine the appropriate discount rate
17
Merger Analysis and the Price Premium Estimating Merger Cash Flows
Should be a straightforward exercise with two exceptions• Need to include in the analysis any adjustments for synergies that are
expected to occur• Need to adjust reinvestment rate that must occur for the expected
growth to occur Unfortunately, estimating expected cash flows for a merger are
quite difficult• The acquiring firm has to do the estimation, but it does not have
access to the target's detailed information about future prospects or the past
• In a friendly merger the target tries to bump up the price so it tends to be overly optimistic with the information shared
• In an unfriendly merger the target does not share information Tendency is for the acquirer to overestimate the value of the target
18
Merger Analysis and the Price Premium The Appropriate Discount Rate
An acquisition is an equity transaction• Should be valued using a discount rate reflective of the cost
of equity• Should use the target's equity rate, not the acquirer's because
the risk of the project is that of the target company
The Value to the Acquirer and the Per-share Price Once the NPV of the target is calculated, must
determine the per-share value• Divide the NPV by the number of shares of stock the target
has outstanding
19
Merger Analysis and the Price Premium The Price Premium
The price offered to the target shareholders is generally higher than the stock's market price
• Whether the merger is friendly or unfriendly The target shareholders can always sell their stock
in the market for the current price, so the acquiring firm has to offer a price that will induce the majority of stockholders to sell to them at once
• The offering price exceeds the current market price by an amount know as the price premium
• Major issue: determining the proper price premium--don't want it to be too high
20
The Price Premium
The fact that price premiums exists creates a speculative opportunity In an investor owns stock in a company that becomes a target,
the stock will experience an increase in price (generally) once the firm becomes in play
Thus, acquiring firms keep merger negotiations secret Illegal for insiders to make short-term profits on price
movements from the acquisition process Insiders include executives and investment bankers
Some investors follow a strategy of buying stock in companies they expect to become takeover targets because they want to benefit from the price increase
21
Paying for the Acquisition—The Junk Bond Market An acquiring firm pays the target firm either one
or a combination of the following Cash Stock in the acquiring firm Debt in the acquiring firm
Acquiring firm needs to either have cash or be able to raise it Use the services of an investment banker Junk bond market began in the 1980s and helped
firms raise cash to finance mergers
22
Paying for the Acquisition—The Junk Bond Market Junk bonds are low quality bonds that pay high
yields Firms that issue them are risky
Prior to 1980s it was not possible for small, risky companies to borrow via bonds However, investment bankers started pooling risky
bonds into funds A recession in the late 1980s caused the junk bond
market to collapse Pioneered by Michael Milken of Drexel Burnham
Lambert
23
Merger Analysis and the Price Premium The Capital Structure Argument to Justify High
Premiums If a company uses debt to raise cash to buy out a target's
stockholders• Usually results in a more leveraged firm
If the increased leverage results in a higher firm value the use of debt may be justified
The Effect of Paying Too Much An acquiring firm that pays too much for a target transfers
value from its shareholders to the target shareholders• If the money was raised by borrowing, the combined firm may
perform poorly or face future failure• Must pay interest payment on debt obligations
24
Defensive Tactics
Represent different strategies management of a target firm can take to prevent firm from being acquired
Tactics After a Takeover is Under Way Challenge the price—management attempts to convince
stockholders that the price offered is too low Claim an antitrust violation—hope the Justice
Department will intervene and prevent the merger Issue debt and repurchase shares—tends to drive up the
current price of the stock, making the price offered by the acquirer less attractive as well as increasing the firm's leverage
25
Defensive Tactics
Tactics After a Takeover is Under Way (continued) Seek a white knight—find an alternative
acquirer with a better reputation for its treatment of acquired firms
Greenmail—buy back stock from a targeted group of stockholders (a group expected to acquire a controlling interest in the firm) at a price greater than the current price
26
Defensive Tactics
Tactics in Anticipation of a Takeover Staggered Election of Directors—if elections are
staggered it will take time for a controlling interest to take control of the board
Approval by a supermajority—mergers need to be approved by stockholder vote—requiring approval by a supermajority makes taking control of the company more difficult
Poison pills—legal devices making it prohibitively expensive for outsiders to take control of the company without approval of the management
27
Types of Poison Pills
Golden parachutes—exorbitant severance packages for a target's management
Accelerated debt—requires the principal amounts be paid immediately if the firm is taken over
Share rights plans (SRPs)—current shareholders are given rights that enable them to buy shares in the merged company at a reduced price after a takeover
28
Leveraged Buyouts (LBO)
A publicly held company's stock is bought by a group of investors either through a negotiated deal or a tender offer Company is no longer publicly traded but is now a private or
closely held firm Majority of the money for the stock purchase is raised by
borrowing with loans secured by the firm's assets Tend to be very risky due to high debt burden
However company attempts to pay down the debt load quickly Specialized LBO companies help put together LBOs
Example: Kohlberg, Kravis & Roberts helped with the LBO of RJR Nabisco
29
Proxy Fights
When corporations elect boards of directors management usually solicits stockholders for their proxies Generally no opposition occurs and stockholders
willingly grant their proxies However, proxy fights occur when opposing
groups solicit shareholders' proxies for the election of directors The winner of the proxy fight owns the controlling
interest on the board
30
Divestitures
A company decides to get rid of a particular business operation Reasons for divestitures
• Cash—a firm needs cash so it sells an operation to generate cash
• Firm may do this after an LBO to raise cash to reduce the debt burden
• Strategic fit—a division may not fit into the firm's long-term plans
• Poor performance
31
Divestitures
Methods of Divesting Companies• Sale for cash and securities• Spin-off—the operation is divested as a separate
corporation and shareholders in the original company are given shares of the new firm
• Liquidation—the divested business is closed down and its assets sold
32
Failure and Insolvency
Economic failure—a firm is unable to provide adequate return to its stockholders
Commercial failure—a business cannot pay its debts (insolvent) Technically insolvent—can't meet short-term
obligations Legally insolvent—a firm's liabilities exceed its
assets A business can be an economic failure but not
be a commercial failure
33
Bankruptcy—Concept and Objectives Bankruptcy is a legal proceeding designed to keep a
single creditor from seizing a firm's assets for itself and preventing other creditors from a claim
Bankruptcy court protects a firm from its creditors and determines whether the firm should remain running or shut down
If a firm is insolvent due to business gone bad Best to shut the company down before it loses any more money
• Salvage assets to pay off debt
If a firm is insolvent due to too much debt but is in a survivable situation Firm may be able to make good on its debt if given enough time
34
Bankruptcy—Concept and Objectives An insolvent company in a situation that is
perceived as recoverable will reorganize Debt will be restructured and a plan developed to pay
creditors as fairly as possible An insolvent company in a situation deemed
unrecoverable will liquidate Assets will be sold under the court's supervision
• Proceeds used to pay creditors according to priority
Bankruptcy proceedings are designed to save as much pain and loss as possible when a firm fails
35
Bankruptcy Procedures—Reorganization, Restructuring, Liquidation
A bankruptcy petition can be initiated by either the insolvent company (voluntary) or its creditors (involuntary) A group as small as three unsecured creditors owed
as little as $5,000 can place a firm in involuntary bankruptcy
A firm in bankruptcy is usually allowed to continue operations However, to guard against unethical acts, a trustee
may be appointed to oversee operations
36
Reorganization
A reorganization is a plan under which an insolvent firm continues to operate while attempting to pay off its debts
Management and stockholders support a reorganization over liquidation If liquidation occurs management has no job and stockholders usually
receive nothing Once a bankruptcy petition is filed, management has 120 days to
file a reorganization plan Reorganization plans are judged based on fairness and feasibility
Fairness—claims are satisfied based on priorities Feasibility—the likelihood that the plan will actually occur
A reorganization plan must be approved by the bankruptcy court as well as the firm's creditors and stockholders
37
Debt Restructuring
Insolvent firms are those that cannot meet their debt obligations Generally a reduction in payments is needed
• Debt restructuring involves concessions that lower an insolvent firm's payments so it can continue operating
Debt restructuring can be accomplished in two ways: Extension—creditors agree to extend the time the firm has to repay
its debts• Deferrals of interest and principal are common
Composition—creditors agree to settle for less than the full amount owed
Creditors have an incentive to compromise because if the firm fails they are unlikely to receive as much as they would otherwise
38
Debt Restructuring
Debt-to-equity conversions are a common method of restructuring debt Creditors give up their debt claims in return
for stock in the company• Reduces debt burden on firm• Eases cash flow problems
If the firm survives the equity may be worth more in the long run than the debt given up
39
Liquidation
Liquidation involves closing a troubled firm and selling its assets
A trustee attempts to recover any unauthorized transfers out of the firm When bankruptcy is anticipated assets are frequently
removed• Illegal because these assets should be used to satisfy creditors'
claims
Trustee then supervises the sale of the assets and pools the funds so that creditors' claims can be satisfied The trustee then distributes the funds
40
Liquidation
Claimants include Vendors who sold to the firm on credit Employees who are owed wages Customers who put down deposits for
merchandise Government which may be owed taxes Lawyers and the court itself Stockholders receive what is left over (if
anything)
41
Distribution Priorities
Distribution follows an order of priority set forth by the bankruptcy code
The priority code states that some claimants are ahead of others in the order of payoff
Priority code payoffs Secured debt—debt that is guaranteed by a specific
asset• These creditors are paid when the specified assets are sold
—remaining funds are placed into the pool of funds to pay remaining claimants
42
Distribution Priorities
Priority code payoffs Administrative expenses of the bankruptcy proceedings Certain business expenses incurred after the bankruptcy
petition is filed Unpaid wages—up to $2,000 per employee Certain unpaid contributions to employee benefit plans Certain customer deposits—up to $900 per person Unpaid taxes Unsecured creditors Preferred stockholders Common stockholders