control measures for the 8-hour ozone sip metropolitan washington air quality committee april 27,...
TRANSCRIPT
Control Measures for the 8-hour Ozone SIP
Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee
April 27, 2005
• Process and Timeline
• Lists of Measures
• What’s on the Lists?
• Adding to the List
Outline
• Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup
• Identify Options
• Estimate Emission Reduction and Cost
• Assess Feasibility
• Use Screening Criteria
• Identify Priorities
Process
Control Measure Timeline
20042004 20072007 20092009 201020102006200620052005
Attainment year
Attainment year
All measures must be
implementedby start of
ozone season
All measures must be
implementedby start of
ozone season
Finalize control strategy (winter)
Finalize control strategy (winter)
Identify measures for early action
Identify measures for early action
Adopt preliminary control strategy
(summer)
Adopt preliminary control strategy
(summer)
Identify priority
measures
Identify priority
measures
Public meetings on control strategy (Fall)
Public meetings on control strategy (Fall)
Submit SIP (due June 15, 2007)
Submit SIP (due June 15, 2007)
New State regulations
must be adopted
New State regulations
must be adopted
Region designated
NAA for 8-hr ozone
Region designated
NAA for 8-hr ozone
Control Measures Lists
Master List of Control MeasuresMaster List of Control Measures
List of Proposed Priority MeasuresList of Proposed Priority Measures
Innovative Measures BundleInnovative Measures Bundle
Approximately 327 measures. Stationary (41)
Area (52)
Nonroad (65)
Mobile (169)
21 measures within the nonattainment area and in upwind contributing areas.
22 innovative measures for local implementation.
• Emission Reduction– Low (0-1 tpd)– Medium (2-5 tpd)– High (>5 tpd)
• Cost per ton– Low (0-$2,000/ton)– Medium ($2,000 to $9,000/ton)– High (>$10,000/ton)
• Feasibility considers both technical and economic issues.
Ranking Thresholds
• Measures Implemented within the Nonattainment Area
• Measures for Upwind “Contributing” Areas
Strategies
CATEGORY/CLASSIFICATION
Severe 17 Los Angeles
Moderate
Marginal
Subpart 1 (Basic)
Subpart 1 EAC (Basic)
Moderate EAC Greensboro, NC
Classification of 8-hour Nonattainment Ozone Areas
Serious - Riverside Co (Coachella Valley), San Joaquin, Sacramento, CA
CATEGORY/CLASSIFICATION
Severe 17 Los Angeles
Moderate
Marginal
Subpart 1 (Basic)
Subpart 1 EAC (Basic)
Moderate EAC Greensboro, NC
Classification of 8-hour Nonattainment Ozone Areas
Serious - Riverside Co (Coachella Valley), San Joaquin, Sacramento, CA
• Option 1. Adopt OTC Model Rule (CAIR +)
• Option 2. Plant-by-Plant Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)
Example: Additional Stationary Source Reductions
• I-95 Corridor
• Truck Stop Electrification (TSE)
• Engine Control Module (ECM) Recalibration
Example: OTC Corridor Strategy
• Develop voluntary agreement to cap emissions at the region’s airports.
• Ground Service Equipment, Ground Access Equipment, Gate Electrification
• National, Dulles, and BWI
Example: Airport Emissions Cap
• Portable Fuel Containers
• Solvent Cleaning
• Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing
• AIMs
• Consumer Products
Example: Expand OTC Measures to Upwind Counties
• Option 1. Sector Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)
• Option 2. Source-by-Source Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
Example: Expand NOx and VOC Controls to Upwind Counties
• Implement under EPA’s voluntary measures guidance.
• Include programs being implemented at the local level (energy efficiency, renewable energy, pollution prevention, clean fuel vehicles, diesel retrofits).
Innovative Measures Bundle
Coordinate with IAQC on Upwind ControlsComplete Draft Priority Measures Report
Document Emission Reduction and Cost for each Priority Measure
MWAQC Reviews Prelimin. Control Measures – May 25, 2005
Master List is a living document, suggestions always welcome.
Next Steps
Providing Input to Process
Send Suggestions to:[email protected]
ContactsJeff King Air Quality [email protected]
Joan Rohlfs, Chief Air Quality [email protected]