continuous improvement performance plan (cipp)

23
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story

Upload: rio

Post on 20-Jan-2016

127 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP). New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story. 47.5%. Indicator 1 Graduation Rate. Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma. State Target: 80%; State Average: 56.3%. 05-06. 06-07. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Continuous Improvement

Performance Plan (CIPP)

New Hanover County Schools

Students with Disabilities

Data Story

Page 2: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 1Graduation Rate

State Target: 80%; State Average: 56.3%

47.5%

37.8%

Percent of youth with IEPs graduating

from high school with a regular diploma.

05-06

06-07 07-0845.8

%

08-09

43.9%

09-10

44.3%

10-11

42.0%

Page 3: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 2Drop Out

State Target: 6.0%; State Average: 8.0%

8.3% 9.7%

Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out

of high school.

05-06 06-07 07-08

6.8%

08-09

8.4%

09-10

11.7%

Page 4: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 3Assessment Participation & Performance/Reading

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11

99 100 100 100

96 73 73 92

Grade

State Targe

t

3-8 95

10 95

0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8 (Safe Harbor)

Grade

State Targe

t

3-8 43.2

10 38.5

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11

24.1 39.8 45.6 42.0

22.2 23.3 25.7 20.3

Participation

Performance

Page 5: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 3Assessment Participation & Performance/Math

Grade

State Target

3-8 77.2

10 68.4

07-08

08-09 09-10

10-11

39.8 56.0 61.4

61.0

27.8 39.3 51.9

51.6

0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8 (Safe Harbor)

Grade

State Target

3-8 95

10 95

07-08

08-09 09-10

11-12

99 100 100 100

84 73 76 94

Performance

Participation

Page 6: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion

Rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year that is twice the state average or greater.

State Target: 7%; State Average: 2.3%06-07

0.3% 0%

07-08 08-09

1.0%

09-10

n/a

Page 7: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment

Percent of children with IEPs aged 6through 21 served in regular,

separate, or public, private, home or hospitalsettings.

Page 8: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment

Amount of

Removal

State Target

Regular 64.6%

Separate 15.7%

05-06

06-07

55.4 52.3

24.1 22.6

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11

50.1 61.8 59.6 58.6

20.0 18.5 17.5 15.9

Page 9: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 6Preschool LRE

No data or targets set at this time

Page 10: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 7Early Childhood Outcomes

Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in positive social-emotional skills, acquisition and use of knowledge and skills, and use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

A. % Substantially improvement byage 6

B. % Functioningat age 6

Skills State Target

State Averag

e

NHCS 08-09

NHCS 09-10

A. Social/Emotional

TBD 88.9% 86.0% 90%

B. Social/Emotional

TBD 57.0% 41.0% 47%

A. Com/Literacy TBD 89.0% 82.0% 77%

B. Com/Literacy TBD 54.1% 52.0% 56%

A. Approp. Behavior

TBD 88.3% 87.0% 86%

B. Approp. Behavior

TBD 67.9% 58.0% 60%

Page 11: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 8Parent Involvement

Percent of parents with a school age child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for children with disabilities.

State Target: 40%.

08-09

43.0%

Page 12: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 9Disproportionality Spec Ed

Percent of districts with disproportionaterepresentation of racial and ethnic groupsin special education and related servicesthat is the result of inappropriate identification.

State Target 0%

NHCS 0%

Page 13: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 10Disproportionality by Category

NHCS data indicate disproportionaterepresentation of racial and ethnic groupsin specific disability categories that is theresult of inappropriate identification.

State target: 0%

NHCS – 0%

Page 14: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 1190 Day Timeline

Percent of children referred for whom areferral was received and placementdetermined within 90 days.

State Target: 100%

45%

77%

05-06 06-07 07-08

08-09

90%67%

09-10

95%

Page 15: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 12Part C to Part B

Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B who receive

special education and related services by their third birthday.

State Target: 100%

74%

78%

05-06 06-07 07-08

08-09

96%88%

09-10

100%

Page 16: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals

Percent of youth aged 16 and above with

an IEP that includes coordinated,measurable, annual IEP goals andtransition services that will reasonablyenable the child to meet the postsecondary goals.

Page 17: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals

6% 24%

05-06 06-07 07-08

35%

100%Corrected within a year

State Target: 100%

08-09

64%

100% 100%

09-10

71%

100%

Page 18: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 14Post-School Outcomes

Percent of youth who had IEP’s, are nolonger in secondary school and who havebeen competitively employed, enrolled insome type of postsecondary school, or,both, within one year of leaving highschool.

State Baseline Data: 75%NHCS Baseline: 70%

Page 19: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 15General Supervision Part 1Percent of noncompliance

identified and corrected within one year.

State Target: 100%

100%

05-06 06-07

100%

07-08

100%

08-09

100%

09-10

100%

Page 20: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Indicator 15General Supervision Part 2Percent of compliance rate of

InternalRecord Review.State Target: 100%

25%

05-06 06-07

66%

07-08

91%

08-09

81%

09-10

90%

Page 21: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

What’s the Plan (PreK-12)? Training in Intensive Scientific, Research-

based Reading and Math instruction (Language!, Corrective Reading, Number Worlds)

KU Content Literacy Continuum (Secondary Pilot)

Superintendent’s Graduation-Dropout Task Force

Response to Instruction (RTI) K-8 & Preschool Play Based Assessment

Add School-wide Positive Behavior Support Sites

Intensified training, tools and monitoring practices in implementation and compliance

Page 22: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

IDEA 2004 – 34 CFR 300.604 Meets Requirements (NHCS status – 08-

09 & 09-10) Needs Assistance – Direct the use of

funds Needs Intervention – Withhold funds Needs Substantial Intervention –

Recover Funds

What are the consequences?

Page 23: Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP)

Questions?