contaminated soil

Upload: atom12

Post on 05-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    1/8

    Petroleum Product Identification in Environmental Samples:Distribution Patterns of Fuel-Specific Homologous Series

    Yakov Galperin, Henry Camp

    Identification of fuel-type in environmental samples (hydrocarbon fingerprinting) is one

    of the major objectives of forensic investigations conducted at many of the petroleum-

    contaminated sites throughout the country. Among analytical methods commonly used toidentify fugitive refined petroleum products, are those that focus on hydrocarbon group-

    type analysis, such as alkanes, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and thepolycyclic alkanes, often referred to as biomarkers. These classic methods are included inthe analytical arsenal of most laboratories conducting fuel fingerprinting. Basic principles

    of their application have been exhaustively examined in this column by Battelle

    researchers.

    Alkane distribution patters are routinely obtained using gas chromatography with flame

    ionization detection (GC/FID). For petroleum products that have not undergonenoticeable biodegradation, this method provides an adequate procedure for fingerprinting

    and fuel recognition based on the n-alkane homologous series. However, GC/FID issignificantly less useful for identification of other hydrocarbon groups, which is often

    necessary for petroleum product fingerprinting in weathered environmental samples.Conventional analytical methods for identification of isoprenoids, PAH and biomarkers

    which are commonly used in characterizing crude oil, are of limited utility for light andsome middle distillate fuels.

    The serious limitations for the application of normal alkanes arises from the fact thatupon release into the environment, refined petroleum products are subject to various

    weathering changes. In weathered products, most n-alkanes could be lost due to

    biological degradation, whereas distribution of the more recalcitrant isoprenoids andPAH may not provide conclusive information on the source or type of fugitive fuel.

    Recent investigations demonstrated that the cyclohexane homologous series of

    hydrocarbons also exhibits fuel-specific distribution patterns that allow for fingerprintingof weathered fugitive fuels.

    Fuel-specific distribution patterns

    Crude oil contains a wide range of hydrocarbons from light gases to heavy residue. Atthe refinery, crude oil is separated by distillation into three main products: naphtha,

    middle distillate and bottoms fraction. Naphtha is mainly used for motor gasoline and

    processed further for octane improvement. The middle distillate can actually be

    1

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    2/8

    separated into two categories consisting of kerosene range products (light-end) and dieselrange products (heavy-end). The light-end products are used for specialty solvents

    (mineral spirits, stoddard solvent, etc), certain jet fuels and light diesel fuels (diesel #1).

    The heavy-end middle distillates are used for diesel fuels (diesel #2), some jet fuels andheating oils.

    Based on the systematic studies of different commercial and military fuels, it wasdetermined that in addition to a well-known alkane pattern, cyclohexane homologous

    series also exhibit characteristic distribution patterns. Examples of alkane and

    alkylcyclohexane patterns for three common fuels are shown in Figures 1-3. The

    alkylcyclohexane distribution in gasoline (Figure 1) exhibits an asymmetric rapidlydecreasing pattern from methylcyclohexane to heptylcyclohexane. Jet propulsion fuel Jet

    A (Figure 2) is characterized by a distribution pattern in the range from

    methylcyclohexane to decylcyclohexane with the maximum at butylcyclohexane. Dieselfuel exhibits alkylcyclohexane pattern from methylcyclohexane to tridecylcyclohexane

    with maximum at pentylcyclohexane (Figure 3).

    The range of hydrocarbons in each product is determined by its boiling range, whereas

    the distribution pattern reflects its application-specific formulation. Since the composition

    of modern fuels is controlled by stringent manufacturing specifications, the range anddistribution pattern of each fuel varies only slightly, depending on the composition of

    crude oil feedstock and refining practices used in manufacture.

    Fuel-type characterization in weathered samples

    Distribution patterns shown demonstrate that alkylcyclohexane distribution patterns are

    as fuel-specific as are the alkane distributions.The main advantage in utilizingalkylcyclohexane patterns for hydrocarbon fuel recognition is that alicyclic compounds

    are more resistant to environmental alteration and could be detected in a sample even

    when most of the alkanes are degraded. Two case studies illustrating the application ofalkylcyclohexane pattern recognition for weathered environmental samples are

    summarized below.

    Case 1. Shown in Figure 4 is an alkane distribution pattern in the product sample. The

    product lost most of n-alkanes due to weathering in the subsurface environment. The

    group of peaks identified on the chromatogram represents isoalkanes, whose distributionsuggests the presence of diesel fuel. Because of the alkane reduction, it is not apparent if

    other middle distillate products are also present. However, evaluation of the

    alkylcyclohexane pattern confirms that the product consists entirely of diesel fuel.

    Case 2. Alkane distribution patterns of two samples collected at the same site are shown

    in Figure 5. Sample A have lost most of n-alkanes and appears to represent a severely

    weathered product, whereas a high abundance of n-alkanes in sample B attests to itsrelatively unaltered nature. A significant difference in the degree of product weathering

    does not allow evaluating their source relationship. However, a comparison of the

    alkylcyclohexane distributions (Figure 6) clearly indicates that both samples represent thesame fuel-type.

    2

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    3/8

    Figure 1. Gasoline alkane (a) and alkylcyclohexane (b) distribution patterns

    5.00 10.0015.0020.0025.0030.0035.0040.0045.0050.0055.0060.0065.000

    20000

    40000

    60000

    80000

    100000

    120000

    140000

    160000

    180000

    200000

    220000

    240000

    260000

    280000

    300000

    320000

    340000

    360000

    380000

    400000

    420000

    Time

    Response_

    09190036.D\FID1A

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Methylcyclohexane

    Ethylcyclohexane

    Propylcyclohexane

    Butylcyclohexane

    Pentylcyclohexane

    Hexylcyclohexane

    Heptylcyclohexane

    Octylcyclohexane

    Nonylcyclohexane

    Decylcyclohexane

    Undecanylcyclohexane

    Dodecanylcyclohexane

    Tridecanylcyclohexane

    RelativeAbundance,%

    (b)

    (a)

    3

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    4/8

    Figure 2. Jet A fuel alkane (a) and alkylcyclohexane (b) distribution patterns

    5.00 10.0015.0020.0025.0030.0035.0040.0045.0050.0055.0060.0065.000

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000

    60000

    70000

    80000

    90000

    100000

    110000

    120000

    130000

    140000

    150000

    Time

    Response_

    09190041.D\FID2B

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Methylcyclohexane

    Ethylcyclohexane

    Propylcyclohexane

    Butylcyclohexane

    Pentylcyclohexane

    Hexylcyclohexane

    Heptylcyclohexane

    Octylcyclohexane

    Nonylcyclohexane

    Decylcyclohexane

    Undecanylcyclohexane

    Dodecanylcyclohexane

    Tridecanylcyclohexane

    Relative

    Abundance,%

    n-C9

    n-C16

    n-C12

    (b)

    (a)

    4

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    5/8

    Figure 3. Diesel fuel alkane (a) and alkylcyclohexane (b) distribution patterns

    5.00 10.0015.0020.0025.0030.0035.0040.0045.0050.0055.0060.0065.000

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000

    60000

    70000

    80000

    90000

    100000

    110000

    120000

    Time

    Response_

    09190044.D\FID1A

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Methylcyclohexane

    Ethylcyclohexane

    Propylcyclohexane

    Butylcyclohexane

    Pentylcyclohexane

    Hexylcyclohexane

    Heptylcyclohexane

    Octylcyclohexane

    Nonylcyclohexane

    Decylcyclohexane

    Undecanylcyclohexane

    Dodecanylcyclohexane

    Tridecanylcyclohexane

    RelativeAbundance,%

    n-C9

    n-C21

    n-C14

    (b)

    (a)

    5

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    6/8

    Figure 4. Product sample alkane (a) and alkylcyclohexane (b) distribution patterns

    5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.000

    50000

    100000

    150000

    200000

    250000

    300000

    350000

    400000

    450000

    500000

    550000

    600000

    650000

    700000

    Time-->

    Abundance

    Ion 85.00 (84.70 to 85.70): Y4504.D

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Methylcyclohexane

    Ethylcyclohexane

    Propylcyclohexane

    Butylcyclohexane

    Pentylcyclohexane

    Hexylcyclohexane

    Heptylcyclohexane

    Octylcyclohexane

    Nonylcyclohexane

    Decylcyclohexane

    Undecanylcyclohexane

    Dodecanylcyclohexane

    Tridecanylcyclohexane

    Relative

    Abundance,%

    i-C18

    i-C15

    i-C15

    Ph

    Pr

    (b)

    (a)

    6

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    7/8

    Figure 5. Product samples alkane distribution patterns

    20.0025.0030.0035.0040.0045.0050.0055.0060.0065.0070.0075.0080.0085.000

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    30000

    35000

    40000

    45000

    50000

    55000

    60000

    65000

    70000

    75000

    80000

    85000

    90000

    95000

    100000

    Time-->

    bundance

    Ion 85.00 (84.70 to 85.70): V4978.D

    20.0025.0030.0035.0040.0045.0050.0055.0060.0065.0070.0075.0080.0085.000

    5000

    10000

    15000

    20000

    25000

    30000

    35000

    40000

    45000

    50000

    55000

    60000

    65000

    70000

    Time-->

    Abundance

    Ion 85.00 (84.70 to 85.70): V4687.D

    Sample A

    Sample B

    n-C11

    7

  • 8/2/2019 Contaminated Soil

    8/8

    Figure 6. Product samples alkylcyclohexane distribution patterns

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Methylcyclohexane

    Ethylcyclohexane

    Propylcyclohexane

    Butylcyclohexane

    Pentylcyclohexane

    Hexylcyclohexane

    Heptylcyclohexane

    Octylcyclohexane

    Nonylcyclohexane

    Decylcyclohexane

    Undecanylcyclohexane

    Dodecanylcyclohexane

    Tridecanylcyclohexane

    RelativeAbundance,%

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Methylcyclohexane

    Ethylcyclohexane

    Propylcyclohexane

    Butylcyclohexane

    Pentylcyclohexane

    Hexylcyclohexane

    Heptylcyclohexane

    Octylcyclohexane

    Nonylcyclohexane

    Decylcyclohexane

    Undecanylcyclohexane

    Dodecanylcyclohexane

    Tridecanylcyclohexane

    RelativeAbundance,%

    Sample B

    Sample A

    8