consumer concerns with the privacy of data collected from ...€¦ · your intelligence quotient...

1
0 15 30 45 strongly agree strongly disagree Percent of Participants 2 121 Consumer Concerns with the Privacy of Data Collected from Brain Wearables Beatrice Capestany 1 , Elish Mahajan 2 , Lydia Kwong 1 , Nita Farahany 1,3 Bass Connections in Brain & Society § Brain wearables exist. The devices use electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor your brainwaves § Because it feels like these devices could reveal particularly sensitive information about you, there has been an intensifying call for neuroprivacy—a form of privacy that protects data gathered directly from the brain (Yuste & Goering, 2017) 1 2 § People are most worried about the potential for consumer neurotechnologies to read one’s thoughts § Only specific thoughts and images in the mind are considered to be highly sensitive § Need to ensure calls for neuroprivacy are calibrated with consumer concerns regarding the nature of information that is gathered 11 We next plan to characterize concerns across contexts. For example, would people care more about brain metrics if they’re being collected by insurance companies? 1 121 21 We sought to fill this gap in the literature by conducting surveys to understand what kinds of brain data people would find particularly sensitive. Most participants strongly agreed that they would want to try the device on themselves: Over half of participants (58%) were not comfortable sharing their data with third parties even when they had control over their sharing preferences: A top concern that participants had was that the devices would be capable of reading the thoughts in your mind: Data about the specific thoughts and images in a person’s mind were among the top five most sensitive pieces of information. However, metrics that can currently be collected with brain wearables were no more concerning than other information that is currently gathered by third parties 1 121 1 Duke Initiative for Science & Society; Duke University Trinity College of Arts & Sciences; 3 Duke Law 41.4 58.2 would not share would share READ MIND BRAIN THOUGHTS INFRINGEMENT RECORD LIE KNOW THINK PEOPLE TRANSLATING DETECT IDEAS SPECIFIC ABLE MEMORIES 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% The media you like Your basic purchasing habits Your political views Your religious and spiritual views Your sleep patterns Your intelligence quotient (IQ) Your sexual orientation The websites you have visited Who your friends are and what they are like Your birth date The content of your social media accounts Your ability to focus on tasks Your mental drowsiness Searches you have made online Your mental alertness Your mental concentration Details about your drug or alcohol use The emotions you experience The mental anxiety you experience Your relationship history Your genetic information Graphical readout of brainwaves Details about your brain health The numbers you have called or texted Details about your physical location The content of your email messages The state of your health The content of your text messages The images in your mind Your credit score and credit history The thoughts in your mind The content of your phone conversations Your social security number very sensitive somewhat sensitive not too sensitive not at all sensitive § People calling for neuroprivacy are not clear about what they mean by brain data, or what types of brain data people would find more or less sensitive § Without this basic understanding, we run the risk of over regulating these neurotechnologies, which could lead to impediments in technological progress Survey 1 (n = 526; MTurk sample) assessed general attitudes towards brain wearables § Ps watched short instructional video on EEG devices § Ps answered questions about their attitudes and concerns about devices § Ps answered basic demographics Survey 2 (n = 1513; panel of nationally representative respondents) assessed perceptions of the sensitivity of different forms of information that can be collected about a person § Ps answered questions about their attitudes towards data privacy § Ps rated 33 differing types of information that could be collected about them (e.g. birthdate, SSN, levels of alertness, thoughts in mind) § Ps answered basic demographics

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Consumer Concerns with the Privacy of Data Collected from ...€¦ · Your intelligence quotient (IQ) Your sexual orientation The websites you have visited Who your friends are and

0

15

30

45

strongly agree strongly disagree

Perc

ent o

f Par

ticip

ants

2 12 1

Consumer Concerns with the Privacy of Data Collected from Brain WearablesBeatrice Capestany1, Elish Mahajan2, Lydia Kwong1, Nita Farahany1,3 Bass Connections in Brain

& Society

§ Brain wearables exist. The devicesuse electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor your brainwaves

§ Because it feels like these devices could reveal particularly sensitive information about you, there has been an intensifying call for neuroprivacy—a form of privacy that protects data gathered directly from the brain (Yuste & Goering, 2017)

1 2

§ People are most worried about the potential for consumer neurotechnologies to read one’s thoughts

§ Only specific thoughts and images in the mind are considered to be highly sensitive

§ Need to ensure calls for neuroprivacy are calibrated with consumer concerns regarding the nature of information that is gathered

1 1

We next plan to characterize concerns across contexts. For example, would people care more about brain metrics if they’re being collected by insurance companies?

1 1 21

2 1

We sought to fill this gap in the literature by conducting surveys to understand what kinds of brain data people would find particularly sensitive.

Most participants strongly agreed that they would want to try the device on themselves:

Over half of participants (58%) were not comfortable sharing their data with third parties even when they had control over their sharing preferences:

A top concern that participants had was that the devices would be capable of reading the thoughts in your mind:

Data about the specific thoughts and images in a person’s mind were among the top five most sensitive pieces of information.

However, metrics that can currently be collected with brain wearables were no more concerning than other information that is currently gathered by third parties

1 1 21

1Duke Initiative for Science & Society; Duke University Trinity College of Arts & Sciences; 3Duke Law

41.4

58.2

would not share

would share

READMIND

BRAIN

THO

UGHT

S

INFRINGEMENTRECORD

LIEKNOW

THINK

PEOPLE

TRANSLATING

DETE

CTID

EAS

SPEC

IFIC

ABLE

MEM

ORIE

S

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

The media you likeYour basic purchasing habits

Your political viewsYour religious and spiritual views

Your sleep patternsYour intelligence quotient (IQ)

Your sexual orientationThe websites you have visited

Who your friends are and what they are likeYour birth date

The content of your social media accountsYour ability to focus on tasks

Your mental drowsinessSearches you have made online

Your mental alertnessYour mental concentration

Details about your drug or alcohol useThe emotions you experience

The mental anxiety you experienceYour relationship historyYour genetic information

Graphical readout of brainwavesDetails about your brain health

The numbers you have called or textedDetails about your physical location

The content of your email messagesThe state of your health

The content of your text messagesThe images in your mind

Your credit score and credit historyThe thoughts in your mind

The content of your phone conversationsYour social security number

very sensitive somewhat sensitive not too sensitive not at all sensitive

§ People calling for neuroprivacy are not clear about what they mean by brain data, or what types of brain data people would find more or less sensitive

§ Without this basic understanding, we run the risk of over regulating these neurotechnologies, which could lead to impediments in technological progress

Survey 1 (n = 526; MTurk sample) assessed general attitudes towards brain wearables§ Ps watched short instructional video on EEG devices§ Ps answered questions about their attitudes and concerns

about devices § Ps answered basic demographics

Survey 2 (n = 1513; panel of nationally representative respondents) assessed perceptions of the sensitivity of different forms of information that can be collected about a person§ Ps answered questions about their attitudes towards data

privacy§ Ps rated 33 differing types of information that could be

collected about them (e.g. birthdate, SSN, levels of alertness, thoughts in mind)

§ Ps answered basic demographics