construction project safety and the triple bottom line
TRANSCRIPT
Mike Toole, PE, F.ASCE
Professor, Civil & Env. EngineeringBucknell University
Construction Institute Construction Safety Workshop
Construction Project Safety and the Triple Bottom Line
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE
“All businesses can and must help society achieve three goals that are linked – economicprosperity, environmentalprotection and social equity.”
http://blueandgreentomorrow.com/features/book-review-cannibals-with-forks-john-elkington-1999/
SUSTAINABILITY AND THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE
4
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
Definition of Sustainable Development in Brundtland Commission Report (1987)
Focus on people as much as on the environment Meet the needs of people who
can’t speak for themselves
5
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES
“Commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development;
“Improve quality of life of the local community and society at large.”
“Improve quality of life of the workforce and their families;
Source: World Business Council for Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development
7
Design and construction that doesn’t unfairly affect people who are not at the table
Further reading:Toole, T. M. and G. Carpenter (2013). “Prevention through Design as a Path Towards Social Sustainability.” ASCE Journal of Architectural Engineering 19(3):169-173.
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FUTURE ISSUES
How will we convince all stakeholders that our project will not unfairly affect people who are not at the table during the concept development, design and construction planning? Local politicians and regulators Financiers Nearby residents Construction workers Maintenance workers Building occupants Our employees
8
ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
Contractors’ Experience Modification Rating directly affects project profits and ability to compete.
Safety is good investment. Preventing accidents is more cost effective than incurring the
direct and indirect costs of accidents when they occur. Average direct cost per injury is $39,000 and $1.42M for fatality. Indirect costs of injury are 2-17 times direct costs. $1 in safety investment returns $2-6 in benefits.
Productivity and morale gains often more valued than injury cost savings.
National Safety Council (2013). “Journey to Safety Excellence: The Business Case for Investment in Safety.”
ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY FUTURE ISSUES
Does making the business case for safety investment require quantitative data?
If so, how and when should we do it? Will the current administration’s pro-business initiatives affect
our investment in safety?
10
DESIGN HAS MAJOR LEVERAGE
Ability to influence key project goals is greatest early in the project schedule during planning and design (Szymberski, 1997)
PREVENTION THROUGH DESIGN (PTD)
“Addressing occupational safety and health needs in the design process to prevent or minimize the work-related hazards and risks associated with the construction, manufacture, use, maintenance, and disposal of facilities, materials, and equipment.”
(http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/)
PTD IN CONSTRUCTION IS…
Explicitly considering construction and maintenance safety in the design of a project.
Being conscious of and valuing the safety of construction and maintenance workers when performing design tasks.
Making design decisions based in part on a design element's inherent safety risk to construction and maintenance workers.
“Safety Constructability and Maintainability”
HIERARCHY OF CONTROLS
Rel
iabi
lity
of C
ontro
lElimination
Eliminate the hazard during design
SubstitutionSubstitute a less-hazardous material or
form during designEngineering Controls“Design-in” engineering controls,
Incorporate warning systems
Administrative ControlsWell-designed work
methods & organization
PPEAvailable, effective,
easy to use
Prevention through Design
Low
erH
ighe
r
PTD AROUND THE GLOBE
Required in UK since 1995 Required now in:
European Union Australia South Africa Singapore
15
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF DESIGNING FOR SAFETY
Reduced site hazards
Fewer worker injuries and fatalities
Reduced workers’ compensation premiums
Increased productivity and quality
Fewer delays due to accidents
Improved operations/maintenance safety
ASCE CODE OF ETHICS AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
Canon 1: Hold Safety Paramount Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of
the public and shall strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development in the performance of their professional duties.
a. Engineers shall recognize that the lives, safety, health and welfare of the general public are dependent upon engineering judgments, decisions and practices incorporated into structures, machines, products, processes and devices.
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FUTURE ISSUES Do not our duties include minimizing all risks that we have
control over?
Do not we have the same duties for construction and maintenance workers as for the “public”?
Is the “good” associated with Prevention through Design outweighed by the risks to individuals firms who adopt it and to the profession as a whole?
How can we reduce the risks of adopting Prevention through Design for individual firms and the profession?
MORE ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY FUTURE ISSUES
Does Prevention through Design really provide the expected economic benefits to the project owner?
If so, how can we enable Prevention through Design to occur without incurring economic harm to design professionals?
19
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
Environmental Sustainability have helped us to take a life cycle approach
Research has shown that green building has new hazards
LEED BC has a pilot credit for prevention through design
PREFABRICATION: THE LINK BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND SAFETY
Prefabricated construction is inherently safer than “stick-built.” Work is shifted from dangerous work environments to engineered
work environments and processes. at height in trenches in confined spaces exposed to weather (wind, water, ice, mud, lightning)
Prefabricated construction has lower construction waste lower embodied energy lower embodied greenhouse gases
Effective prefabrication often requires designer-constructor collaboration
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY FUTURE ISSUES
How will we convince all stakeholders that our project will not unfairly affect the natural environment?
How are we doing to achieve ASCE’s “Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025”? “Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global
quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master:
• stewards of the natural environment and its resources;
How can we better collaborate to enable prefabrication? Should prefabrication receive more credit in sustainability rating
systems?
SO WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOU?
Every one (owners, designers, constructors) should be thinking about all three aspects of sustainability.
We must collaborate DURING DESIGN to maximize a project’s sustainability.
We can use Design-Assist and other processes to enable needed collaboration even on Design-Bid-Build projects.
CLOSING
Our clients, employees and children will increasingly be demanding that we proactively consider the triple bottom line in the design and construction of our projects.
Achieving ASCE’s vision 2025 and improving the reputations of the civil engineering profession and construction industry require collaborative approaches to construction safety.
