consciousness in mixed systems: here…. tucson …cogprints.org/6828/1/qualitativebmi.pdf ·...

1
Consciousness in mixed systems: merging artificial and biological minds via Brain-Machine Interface By Alexandra <ringo-ring> Elbakyan A current approach to BMI … is to rely on existing brain capabilities! What do we expect from BMI? to expand human capabilities by merging with technology Why to merge? Here is a short list of what technology can do and humans can not: to perform a huge number of accurate calculations in a blink of an eye - the gift only rarely given to human incredible memory capacity digital devices are able to remember immediately - without any rehearsal - and store for indefinite time huge amounts of information without losing a tiny detail richness of perception provided by hi-tech sensors far exceeds what our existing biological organs allow for traveling at high speeds, flying, diving deep into ocean and flying high to cosmos is beyond limits of human bodies How to merge? The crucial point is creating appropriate interface between artificial devices and brain. Even if we are going to improve body capabilities, not necessarily mental, brain should be able to perceive and control this new body! Brain-Machine Interface have been a common sci-fi topic for many years. Recently, however, science made a big progress, and now BMI is a target for many scientific and engineering projects. But can current BMI approaches really bring us the kind of technology we expect? A “Conscious” BMI somatosensory cortex motor cortex 2. extraction of movement parameters: direction, velocity… 1. neural activity recording 3. controlling artificial limb 4. sensory feedback 5. stimul- ation internal representation of own body brain plasticity Brain contains direct neural representations of our body, one in motor cortex for controlling movements, the other in somatosensory cortex for feeling the body. Due to brain plasticity, external objects such as tools and artificial limbs can be incorporated into this internal body schema. This approach eats up precious brain resources and can be too limited imagine learning to control 100 hands 6. stimulated cortex gives rise to feelings Motor prosthesis: a BMI will contain its own intelligent substrate with artificial body model for planning and executing movements, and for processing sensory input. Knowledge databases: an artificial web of knowledge organized similarly to our brain. Features that lead to qualitative experience for example, explicit representations a reproduced by the web. Advanced artificial sensors create different types of qualia. In this approach, conscious experience is generated artificially, and then used to expand biological consciousness A connection needs to be created between biological and artificial systems so that their qualia will be united into single conscious experience. A most obvious example of such connection is corpus calossum, a bundle of nerve fibers connecting two brain hemispheres. When this connection is broken, each hemisphere appears to have its own, separate mind. When bundled together, hemispheres are working as a single system, and their conscious experience is also merged into single, coherent one. Brain can turn out to be too limited to manage a body - or several at once - more advanced than human. For this task a next- generation BMI can itself contain additional neural or some other kind of intelligent substrate. This looks reasonable - even brain has two separate hemispheres for managing each side of the body. What is interesting here is that sensory components of our BMI should also be "conscious", so we can feel the artificial body. This is a striking difference from BMIs that provide sensory feedback by stimulating different parts of the cortex, because latter is based on already existing in the brain neural substrate that can produce conscious experiences. In proposed model, we are not eating precious resources of existing substrate (because they may be limited), but rather add new resources by adding our own components. But then these components should be developed with support for generating qualia, like their biological counterparts. There is not too much place here…. Further discussion? Contact me: [email protected] Is this model possible to build from technical point of view? According to some theories of consciousness, a high degree of interconnectedness within system is needed. This is hard to achieve, at least with modern technology. But this needs to be done if we want to truly expand our capabilities otherwise no matter how advanced technology is but we’ll be always limited by what our brains provide. t--> TOWARD A SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS APRIL 12-17, 2010 TUCSON CONVENTION CENTER

Upload: lyngoc

Post on 03-Jul-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Consciousness in mixed systems: here…. TUCSON …cogprints.org/6828/1/qualitativeBMI.pdf · Consciousness in mixed systems: merging artificial and biological minds via Brain-Machine

Consciousness in mixed systems:

merging artificial and biological minds via Brain-Machine Interface

By Alexandra <ringo-ring> Elbakyan

A current approach to BMI

… is to rely on existing brain capabilities!

What do we expect from BMI?

to expand human capabilitiesby merging with technology

Why to merge? Here is a short list of whattechnology can do and humans can not:

• to perform a huge number of accuratecalculations in a blink of an eye - the giftonly rarely given to human

• incredible memory capacity – digitaldevices are able to remember immediately- without any rehearsal - and store forindefinite time huge amounts ofinformation without losing a tiny detail

• richness of perception provided by hi-techsensors far exceeds what our existingbiological organs allow for

• traveling at high speeds, flying, diving deepinto ocean and flying high to cosmos isbeyond limits of human bodies

How to merge? The crucial point is creating appropriate interface between artificial devices and brain. Even if we are going to improve body capabilities, not necessarily mental, brain should be able to perceive and control this new body!

Brain-Machine Interface have been a common sci-fi topic for many years. Recently, however, science made a big progress, and now BMI is a target for many scientific and engineering projects.

But can current BMI approaches really bring us the kind of technology we expect?

A “Conscious” BMI

somatosensorycortex

motorcortex

2. extraction of movement parameters:

direction, velocity…

1. neuralactivity

recording

3. controlling artificial limb

4. sensory feedback

5. stimul-ation

• internal representation of own body• brain plasticity

Brain contains direct neuralrepresentations of our body, onein motor cortex – for controllingmovements, the other insomatosensory cortex – forfeeling the body.

Due to brain plasticity, externalobjects such as tools and artificiallimbs can be incorporated into thisinternal body schema.

This approach eats up precious brainresources and can be too limited –imagine learning to control 100 hands

6. stimulated cortex gives

rise to feelings

Motor prosthesis: a BMI will contain its own

intelligent substrate with artificial body model for planning and executing

movements, and for processing sensory

input.

Knowledge databases: an artificial web of knowledge organized similarly to our

brain. Features that lead to qualitative experience – for

example, explicit representations – a

reproduced by the web.

Advanced artificial sensors create different types of qualia.

In this approach, conscious experience is generated

artificially, and then used to expand biological

consciousness

A connection needs to be created between biological and artificial systems

so that their qualia will be united into single conscious experience. A most

obvious example of such connection is corpus calossum, a bundle of nerve fibers connecting two brain hemispheres. When

this connection is broken, each hemisphere appears to have its own,

separate mind. When bundled together, hemispheres are working as a single

system, and their conscious experience is also merged into single, coherent one.

Brain can turn out to be toolimited to manage a body - orseveral at once - more advancedthan human. For this task a next-generation BMI can itselfcontain additional neural orsome other kind of intelligentsubstrate. This looks reasonable- even brain has two separatehemispheres for managing eachside of the body.

What is interesting here isthat sensory components of ourBMI should also be "conscious",so we can feel the artificial body.This is a striking difference fromBMIs that provide sensoryfeedback by stimulating differentparts of the cortex, becauselatter is based on alreadyexisting in the brain neuralsubstrate that can produceconscious experiences. Inproposed model, we are noteating precious resources ofexisting substrate (because theymay be limited), but rather addnew resources by adding ourown components. But thenthese components should bedeveloped with support forgenerating qualia, like theirbiological counterparts.

There is not too much place here….

Further discussion?Contact me:

[email protected]

Is this model possible to build from technical point of view?According to some theories of consciousness, a high degree of

interconnectedness within system is needed. This is hard to achieve, at least withmodern technology.

But this needs to be done if we want to truly expand our capabilities –otherwise – no matter how advanced technology is – but we’ll be always limitedby what our brains provide.

t-->

TOWARD A SCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESSAPRIL 12-17, 2010

TUCSON CONVENTION CENTER