connecticut river habitat restoration: a significant population of rare mussel species? and paul....
TRANSCRIPT
Connecticut River Habitat Restoration:A Significant Population of Rare Mussel Species?
and Paul. Boison
Northeast Utilities Service Company
James W. Athey Jr.,Nathan Henderson,
Jennifer Doyle-BreenMetcalf & Eddy Inc.
2
Northeast Utilities Service CompanyActing as agent for Holyoke Water Power Company
Project Support
3
Presentation Outline
• Holyoke Coal Tar Project Background
• Coal Tar Excavation Methods
• Project Mitigation Measures
• Methods
• Results
• Rare Mussel Species
• Conclusions
4
Project Background
• 1990: coal tar leachate was observed discharging into the Hadley Falls tailrace
• Suspected source: Holyoke Gas Works, an historic manufactured gas plant (1852 -1951)
• Habitat for federally endangered shortnose sturgeon and protected mussel species
5
Coal Tar Remediation
• 9 coal tar patch locations in Site Portion 1 (north)
• 2 coal tar patch locations in Site Portion 2 (south)
• NOAA, MA DEP mandated remediation
• Remediation plan developed by Metcalf & Eddy in 2001
• Removal work conducted in 2002, 2003, and 2005
• Dry and wet excavation methods
6
Wet Excavation
• Excavator transported to site on a barge
• Containment area enclosed with siltation boom
• Excavated material loaded onto skiff and transported to shore for off-site disposal
7
Dry Excavation
• Containment area enclosed with portable cofferdam
• Work area dewatered
• Excavated material transported off site for disposal
8
• Limited time frame for construction
• Silt curtains and portable cofferdam structures
• Water quality sampling program
• Removal of fish and mussels within containment areas
Construction Mitigation Measures
9
Methods
• Subsurface exploration for juvenile rare mussels
• Mark mussels prior to relocation
• Relocate mussels to relocation areas
• Recapture surveys
• Establish relocation areas (outside of work areas)• Mussel removal by SCUBA diving and snorkeling
10
Buffers and Mussel Relocation Areas
• Establish buffer areas – 2002: 100 feet on all sides– 2003: 100 feet downstream /
20 feet elsewhere– 2005: 50 feet downstream /
20 feet elsewhere
• Establish relocation areas– Surveyed opposite side of
river for suitable habitat– Six relocation areas identified
11
Mussel Removal
• After work areas were identified (60 feet from coal tar edge), buffer areas marked with anchored buoys
• Mussel removal between weighted transect lines– 2002-2003: All mussels– 2005: All rare species and common
1.5” and greater (NHESP requested)
• Collected, counted and identified all mussel species
12
Subsurface Exploration
• Additional requirement by NHESP
• Attempt to collect juvenile rare mussels
• 6 mm screen• Dedicated areas• Randomly selected areas
13
Mark-Recapture Survey• 2002-2003 - All Mussels
– Krylon paint mark
– 2-part epoxy
– One/two year recapture survey
Goal: Determine the general success of the relocation effort
• 2005 Only Rare Mussels– Numbered tags
– One week and one month recapture surveys
14
Mussel Relocation Results
• Four species collected in study area (From left to right)
– Tidewater mucket (Ligumia ochracea)- MA Species of Special Concern
– Yellow lampmussel (Lampsilis cariosa)- MA Endangered
– Eastern Elliptio (Elliptio complanata)- Common
– Alewife floater (Anodonta implicata) (bottom)
15
Mussel Relocation Results (Cont.)2002 2003 2005
Area Surveyed
4.2 acres
10.6 acres
20.4 acres
Alewife floater 0 3 11 14
Tidewater mucket
0 2 8 10
10,455
TOTALS
25,955
53Yellow lampmussel
0 13 40
Eastern Eliptio
454 15,046
• 2005 subsurface exploration:- No juvenile rare mussel species collected
- 1 Adult Tidewater mucket
- 415 Adult Elliptio/526 Juvenile Elliptio
16
Example of Rare Mussel Distribution
17
Mark-Recapture Survey• 2002 – 2003 Results:
• Over 15,000 mussels marked
• 868 recaptured in 2004
• Up to 88% survival for Elliptio
• No rare mussels recaptured
• 2005 Results:• One week survey – approx 38%
mussels found
• One month survey – approx 10% mussels found
• Two mortalities discovered (one tidewater mucket and one yellow lampmussel) – cause undetermined
18
Rare Mussel Species
• Well-established populations of yellow lampmussels and tidewater muckets
• Density of rare mussel species is encouraging– Sandy bottom habitat (0.09/100m2)– Cobble bottom habitat (0.02/100m2)
• Extrapolated population over 4-mile stretch of river 87 to 4,000 lampmussels
• Previously only two known sighting of lampmussels below Holyoke Dam
19
Rare Mussel Species
• Populations are reproducing
• Documented reproductive behavior
• Water quality and habitat improving in Connecticut River
• Due to immense size of Connecticut River and potential available habitat, likely substantial populations along other sections of the river
• Recently documented populations above the Holyoke Dam and further downriver
20
Conclusions
• Mussel relocation was successful at removing 26,000 mussels from 2002 to 2005
• Documented significant populations of rare mussel species
• Mussel densities are variable but rare mussel densities generally higher in coarse sandy substrate
• Despite short-term disruption from coal tar excavation, mitigation measures successful, which furthers the overall project goal of long-term aquatic habitat restoration
21
Comments and Questions