concept mapping as an innovation: documents, memories and notes from finland, sweden, estonia and...
DESCRIPTION
Communicating for innovations Rogers (1983 – 2003) claims in his theory of communication and diffusion of innovations that adopters of any new innovation or idea could be categorized as innovators (2.5%), early adopters (13.5%), early majority (34%), late majority (34%) and laggards (16%). Åhlberg in the 1980s was first an early adopter, and then a co-innovator when he with his research group created what they called improved concept mapping.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS,
MEMORIES AND NOTES FROMFINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND
RUSSIA 1984 – 2008Mauri Åhlberg,
University of Helsinki, FinlandEmail: [email protected] ,
www.helsinki.fi/people/mauri.ahlberg
![Page 2: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Research problem
• What do we know about Novakian type of concept mapping as an innovation adapting Rogers’ theory of communication and diffusion of innovations?
![Page 3: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Communicating for innovations• Rogers (1983 – 2003) claims in his theory of
communication and diffusion of innovations that adopters of any new innovation or idea could be categorized as innovators (2.5%), early adopters (13.5%), early majority (34%), late majority (34%) and laggards (16%).
• Åhlberg in the 1980s was first an early adopter, and then a co-innovator when he with his research group created what they called improved concept mapping.
![Page 4: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Data and methods
• The main data and conclusions are based on documents, memories and notes from Finland, but also from Sweden, Estonia and Russia 1984 – 2008. • Documents are analyzed
qualitatively
![Page 5: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Concept mapping as research method and quality tool
• One of the main innovative uses of concept mapping in Finland has been its use and development as a research method and quality tool.
• E.g. as a research method: transformation of text proposition by proposition into a concept map (Åhlberg & Ahoranta 2008)
![Page 6: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Knowledge representation methods• Concept mapping is compared to other
graphic representation tools, in particular mind mapping and clustering (based on Åhlberg 1990, 1993 and 2007, Åhlberg & Ahoranta 2002)
• Concept mapping vs. mind mapping, http://www.multilingual-matters.net/irgee/011/0119/irgee0110119.pdf
• Concept mapping vs. clustering (Rico 1983 – 2008), Way,
http://www.gabrielerico.com/Main/ClusteringSampleVignettes.htm
![Page 7: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The main features about history of concept mapping in Finland, Sweden,
Estonia and Russia 1984 – 2008• Based on known documents:• Finland: Åhlberg’s R&D group (1987 – 2008) • Sweden: Åhlberg (1993b) ”begreppskartor”• Estonia: Poom, K. 1992: ”Moistekaart ja
moistekaarttehnika” Haridus 7/8, 58 – 60.• Russia: Malinen, R. 2001. Master’s Thesis
![Page 8: CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki,](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5a4d1b5f7f8b9ab0599ac706/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Conclusions
• Based on scattered evidence mind mapping is more spread and used than concept mapping in all these countries.
• In Finland concept mapping has stronger position than in Sweden, Estonia and Russia.
• More research is needed to reveal history and development of Novakian type of concept mapping both regionally and globally.