computer application anxiety, self-efficacy and open source learning management system acceptance
TRANSCRIPT
Computer Application Anxiety, Self-Efficacy and Open Source Learning Management System Acceptance
Norshidah Mohamed, PhDhttp://www.ibs.utm.myNor Shahriza Abdul Karim, PhDInternational Business SchoolUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaKuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
1st International Conference on Digital Services, Internet and Applications (DSIA '12)
Singapore 11 – 13 May 2012
2
OUTLINE
• Introduction• Problem formulation• Solution• Conclusion
3
INTRODUCTION
• The Internet • Learning takes place anywhere and anytime• Before, systems require years to be
implemented• Now, with open source software new systems
can be implemented in a day• Some examples of Open Source Learning
Management Systems: Moodle, Sakai Project and Claroline
4
INTRODUCTION .. Cont’
• Benefits of open source software implementation from educational policy makers’ perspective: ominimal spending on time / efforts in
system development and implementationofacilitating ease in interactions between
students and instructors oreducing costs for paper-based materials
5
PROBLEM FORMULATION
• Open source software presents quick benefits to educators and educational policy makers•May pose challenges on acceptance to
students as users
6
PROBLEM FORMULATION .. Cont’
• Research question: Do computer application anxiety and self-efficacy correlate to system acceptance?
• Research objective: To explore the relationship between computer application anxiety, self-efficacy and acceptance of open source learning management system.
SOLUTION
8
RESEARCH MODEL
Computerapplication
anxiety
Perceivedusefulness
Perceivedease of use
Intention to use
SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE
Selfefficacy
H1a
H1b
H1c
H2a
H2b
H2c
9
THEORETICAL BASIS
• Computer anxiety (Heinnsen et al. 1987)• Social cognitive theory (Bandura 1986;
1989; 1995)• Technology acceptance model (TAM)
(Davis, 1989; Davis et al. 1989)
10
DEFINITIONS USED IN THE STUDYConstructs Definitions
Intention to use A person’s decision on a specific behavioral outcome (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980)
Perceived usefulness The degree a person believes that using a particular system would enhance his or her learning performance (adapted from Davis, 1989)
Perceived ease of use The degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free of effort (Davis, 1989)
11
DEFINITIONS USED IN THE STUDY .. Cont’Constructs Definitions
Self-efficacy An individual’s beliefs about the ability to perform a specific behavior (Compeau and Higgin, 1995)
Computer application anxiety
An individual’s phobia of dealing with computer application (adapted from Heinnsen et al. 1987)
12
CONTEXT
• Research participants – postgraduate business students at a public institution of higher learning in Malaysia• Instrument – Survey questionnaire • Claroline an open source learning
management system was chosen for pilot implementation for a particular course in an eight-week semester (short semester)• Voluntary participation in Claroline and
survey research
14
POPULATION & SAMPLE
• Estimated number for population: 400• Sample for the study: 42
15
MEASURESConstructs
Sources
Intention to usePerceived usefulnessPerceived ease of useSelf-efficacy
Ajzen & Fishbein (1980)Davis (1989)Davis (1989)Compeau and Higgin (1995)
Computer anxiety Heinssen et al. (1987)
Five-point Likert scale for computer application anxiety, self-efficacy, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and intention to use measures where 1 refers to “strongly disagree” and 5 refers to “strongly agree”.
16
RESULTS – PROFILE OF RESPONDENTSProfile of respondents Frequency %
Gender Male 19 45.2Female 22 52.4Missing 1 2.4
Age 20-29 15 35.730-39 16 38.140-49 9 21.4Above 50 1 2.4Missing 1 2.4
17
PROFILE OF MEASURES MeanIntention to use • It is worth to use the Claroline. 3.78• I will frequently use the Claroline in
the future. 3.78
• I will strongly recommend others to use the Claroline.
3.68
• I plan to use the Claroline. 3.83
Average intention to use score: 3.77
18
PROFILE OF MEASURES .. Cont’Mean
Perceived usefulness• Using the Claroline improves my learning
performance. 3.69
• Using the Claroline enhances my effectiveness in learning.
3.64
• Using the Claroline improves the quality of learning.
3.83
• Overall, I find using the Claroline useful in learning.
3.93
Average perceived usefulness score: 3.77
19
PROFILE OF MEASURES .. Cont’Mean
Perceived ease of use• Using the Claroline in learning is easy for me. 3.81• I find it easy to get the Claroline to do what I
want to do. 3.50
• Getting information from the Claroline is easy.
3.75
• My interaction with the Claroline is clear and understandable.
3.51
• It would be easy for me to become skillful at using the Claroline.
3.61
• Overall, I find the Claroline easy to use. 3.71Average perceived ease of use score: 3.65
20
PROFILE OF MEASURES .. Cont’Mean
Self-efficacy
• I would be able to use the Claroline if there is no one around to show me how to use it.
3.32
• I would feel comfortable using the Claroline on my own.
3.68
• I feel confident to download and save files from the Claroline when needed.
3.83
• I feel confident to post and reply to messages in a forum in the Claroline.
3.56
• I feel confident understanding the links in the Claroline.
3.59
Average self-efficacy score: 3.60
21
PROFILE OF MEASURES .. Cont’Mean
Computer application anxiety
• I feel nervous about using the Claroline. 2.22• It scares me to think that I could lose a lot
of information using the Claroline by clicking the wrong button.
2.37
• I hesitate to use the Claroline to post and reply to messages for fear of making mistakes I cannot correct.
2.61
• The Claroline worries me. 2.05Average computer application anxiety score: 2.29
22
RESULTS – RELIABILITY ANALYSISConstructs No. of
ItemsCronbach’s alpha (α)
Intention to use 4 0.854Perceived usefulness 4 0.811Perceived ease of use 6 0.881Self-efficacy 5 0.848Computer anxiety 4 0.884
All measures are reliable since Cronbach’s alpha (α) is > 0.70
23
RESULTS – CORRELATION ANALYSIS ITU PU PEOU SE CAITU 1
PU 0.318* 1
PEOU 0.524** 0.458** 1
SE 0.440** 0.317* 0.605** 1
CA -0.231 -0.163 -0.253 -0.488** 1
** correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2 tailed)* correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2 tailed)ITU: Intention to usePU: Perceived usefulnessPEOU: Perceived ease of useSE: Self-efficacyCA: Computer anxiety
24
SUMMARY – HYPOTHESES RESULTSHypotheses Results
H1a: Computer application anxiety is significantly and negatively correlated to perceived usefulness of open source learning management system.
Not supported
H1b: Computer application anxiety is significantly and negatively correlated to perceived ease of use of open source learning management system.
Not supported
25
SUMMARY – HYPOTHESES RESULTS .. Cont’Hypotheses Results
H1c: Computer application anxiety is significantly and negatively correlated to intention to use open source learning management system.
Not supported
H2a: Self-efficacy is significantly and positively correlated to perceived usefulness of open source learning management system.
Supported
26
SUMMARY – HYPOTHESES RESULTS .. Cont’Hypotheses Results
H2b: Self-efficacy is significantly and positively correlated to perceived ease of use of open source learning management system.
Supported
H2c: Self-efficacy is significantly and positively correlated to intention to use open source learning management system.
Supported
CONCLUSION
28
THEORETICAL IMPLICATION
• Contributed to new knowledge in the context of open source learning management system acceptance oComputer application anxiety is not a significant
factor oSelf-efficacy is a significant factor
29
PRACTICAL IMPLICATION
• For educators and educational policy makers – oSelection of open source learning
management system that promotes quick acceptance (perceived usefulness and ease of use for students)oPromotes environment that is supportive
of self-efficacy (belief to operate a new system) in students
30
LIMITATIONS
• Cross-sectional survey research approach• Only students of a particular course
participated in the research• The findings may not be generalized in the
context of the entire institution and thus may have to be carefully interpreted.
31
FUTURE RESEARCH AREAS
• Longitudinal approach• Undergraduates and postgraduates in
other courses or institutions using Claroline
THANK YOU