computational tie strength: theory and...
TRANSCRIPT
COMPUTATIONAL TIE STRENGTH:THEORY AND APPLICATIONSEric Gilbert’s Prelim
1
2
casey
leslielucas
kevin
3
The strength of a tie is a (probably linear) combination of the amount of TIME, the emotional INTENSITY, the INTIMACY (mutual confiding), and the reciprocal SERVICES which characterize the tie. — Granovetter
TIE STRENGTHconcept & impact
STRONG TIES are the people you really trust.
WEAK TIES, conversely, are merely acquaintances.
4
7,000+ papers cite TSOWT
firms with right mix of ties get better deals
strong ties can affect mental health
TIE STRENGTHconcept & impact
5
USING ITin design & analysis
2 make better friend introductions.
1 build more informed privacy controls.
3 rethink social streams.
4 analyze large-scale, networked phenomena.
MODEL TIE STRENGTH TO…
6
This thesis will show how to RECONSTRUCT it from digital traces, and how to apply it as a DESIGN and ANALYTIC tool.
Tie strength is a blind spot in social media.
7
8
HEURISTICSa sample of substitutes
communication reciprocity [19] Friedkin 1980
one mutual friend [56] Shi, Adamic & Strauss 2007
communication recency [41] Lin, Dayton & Greenwald 1978
interaction frequency [22] Gilbert, Karahalios & Sandvig 2008
[17] Fischer, et al. 2006
9
HEURISTICSthe difference
CHI 2009 MODEL 88% Adj. R2 = 0.53
MSGS → FRIEND 62% Adj. R2 = 0.09
BASELINE 52%
10
COMPUTATIONAL TIE STRENGTHPART ONE
11
DIGITAL TRACESour interactions leave marks
12
THE MAPPING PROBLEM
13
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The literature suggests seven dimensions of tie strength: INTENSITY, INTIMACY, DURATION, RECIPROCAL SERVICES, STRUCTURAL, EMOTIONAL SUPPORT and SOCIAL DISTANCE.
As manifested in social media, can these dimensions predict tie strength? In what combination?
R1.
What are the limitations of a tie strength model based SOLELY on social media?
R2.
14
THE DATAoverview
2,184 assessed friendships
from 35 university students & staff
described by 70+ numeric indicators
15
ASSESSING TIE STRENGTHparticipant interface
16
STATISTICAL METHODS
17
87.6% accuracyχ2(1, N = 4368) = 700.9
p < 0.001
THE MODELperformance
0 1
0
1
+
+μ
μ
prediction
participant
18
DELIVERABLESpart one
multicollinearity & structure
tough dimensions … new techniques
the predictors vs. accuracy tradeoff
five flavors of tie strength
19
DESIGNING AROUND TIE STRENGTHPART TWO
20
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
How GENERAL is the tie strength model? Does it work in a new medium, like Twitter?
R1.
Can automatically-inferred tie strength usefully INFORM DESIGN
in the real world? Can it help the collapsed context problem?R2.
Can feedback from users IMPROVE the model? If so, how does it change?
R3.
21
collision of social circles which normally remain separateTHE COLLAPSED CONTEXT PROBLEM
22
We Meddle demovideo at wemeddle.com
23
RT @Francesca_Elle teens don't tweet is a trending topic WTF ! Teens DO Tweet ... 2m ago from R E D L O G
The Logo Evolution of Coca-Cola and Pepsi. 5m ago from D A R I N G F I R E B A L L
Motorola Unveils Cliq: http://df.ws/dqx 14m ago from D A R I N G F I R E B A L L
good morning yall! just got done eating breakfast and now im off too the gym! 8m ago
from J E R M A I N E O N E A L
Just read that Edward Hall died recently. His work on territoriality briefly mentioned in obit. Wow. http://bit.ly/ltUNL 45m ago
from J E N N T H O M
we meddle BLOG | FAQ | LOGOUTTWEET!
about us
WE MEDDLE arranges things just for you. You can emphasize either your inner circle or your outer circle. If we put somebody in the wrong one, you can fix it: try hovering over a profile icon. Also, we hope you enjoy our filters above. We're in private alpha.
5invite someone
twitter screenname, then press enter
New Typekit JS is live - just 1/10 the size! (about 2k for sites w/o badge. All sites soon). Republish your kits to upgrade. 57m ago from J A S O N S A N TA M A R I A
If the bands opening the NFL season can use auto-tune, can the QB's use auto-pass? 100% completions, but no style at all? 1h ago from G S L I S
The airport is opening its eyes. 1.5h ago
from YA P C H A I A N
more meddling
show only P O S I T I V E T W E E T S 7
show only N E G AT I V E T W E E T S 2
show only F R E Q U E N T P O S T E R S 9
show only I N F R E Q U E N T P O S T E R S 4
show only L I N K S 1 5
Jer Thorp (@blprnt): Visualizations of arts & culture budget cuts in British Columbia http://is.gd/37rfS 1h ago from G E N E R ATO R X
24
[17] Fischer, et al. 2006
[62] Whittaker, et al. 2004.
RELATED SYSTEMSsocially-rendered interfaces
25
METHODShow general is the model?can feedback improve it?
26
METHODScan tie strength usefully inform design?
QUALITATIVE EVALUATION with We Meddle’s users
10 – 20 semi-structured interviews centered on usage and utility
27
TIE STRENGTH & DIFFUSIONPART THREE
28
Dichotomous distinctions [edge exists or not] can sometimes be misleading … a weighted graph representation will frequently be more appropriate. More studies that assess the effectiveness of such approximations — and provide concrete, empirically validated guidelines for practice within particular problem domains — would be a welcome addition to the literature.— 2009 Science article “Revisiting the Foundations of Network Analysis”
TIE STRENGTHits potential in diffusion studies
29
DIFFUSIONevery link is equal
Fowler & Christakis. 2008. Dynamic Spread of Happiness … BMJ.
Ivkovic & Weisbenner. 2007. Information Diffusion Effects in Individual Investors' Common Stock Purchases … Rev. Fin.
Kossinets, Kleinberg & Watts. 2008. The Structure of Information Pathways in a Social Communication Network. KDD.
Onnela, et al. 2007. Structure and Tie Strengths in Mobile Communication Networks. PNAS.
30
WEIGHTED DIFFUSIONfrom Onnela, et al.
31
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Does tie strength modulate the flow of information through a network?
R1.
Does tie strength interact with content as it flows through a network?
R2.
If tie strength regulates information flow through a network, how does this affect macroscopic properties of diffusion?
R3.
32
METHODthe retweet
33
METHODvalue-ladencontent
1 link per 700 tweets ⇒ 1000–1500 users
34
COMPUTATIONAL TIE STRENGTH:THEORY AND APPLICATIONSEric Gilbert
35
Days since last communication
Days since first communication
Intimacy × Structural
Wall words exchanged
Mean strength of mutual friends
Educational difference
Structural × Structural
Reciprocal Serv. × Reciprocal Serv.
Participant-initiated wall posts
Inbox thread depth
Participant’s number of friends
Inbox positive emotion words
Social Distance × Structural
Participant’s number of apps
Wall intimacy words
–0.762
0.755
0.4
0.257
–0.223
0.195
–0.19
0.146
–0.137
–0.136
0.135
0.13
–0.122
0.111
0.299
MOST PREDICTIVEby |beta|
36