comprehension presentation

26
Supporting Comprehension By: Edica Liebl Reading and Literacy Growth (Read – 6707) Walden University Victoria Spera

Upload: edica-polson-liebl

Post on 16-Apr-2017

175 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comprehension presentation

Supporting ComprehensionBy: Edica Liebl

Reading and Literacy Growth (Read – 6707)Walden University

Victoria Spera

Page 2: Comprehension presentation

Supporting Comprehension

•The primary goal of reading is to understand what we read. Comprehension is not just word recognition. Instead, comprehension is a multifaceted process that involves active and intended cognitive effort on the part of the reader, during reading. Meaning is formed by the reader in relationship to the text with purposeful reading (Hollenbeck & Saternus, 2013, p. 559). It is imperative that students receive meaningful experiences with a variety of texts. Teachers must provide explicit instruction in cognitive strategies that students need to use to understand the text, and the essential elements necessary for effective comprehension instruction (p. 559). This presentation will offer instructional strategies teachers use to support students on the road to becoming competent readers and research-based strategies students use to assist in comprehension.

Page 3: Comprehension presentation

Supporting Comprehension Cont.

•There are factors that influence reading comprehension, in addition to cognitive aspects such as fluency. Crucial features of comprehension strategies are the affective aspects including metacognition, motivation and engagement, epistemic belief, and self-efficacy (Afflerbach, Cho, Kim, Crassas, & Doyle, 2013, p.441). These features must be considered within instructional plans for reading comprehension. How can each feature inform instruction?

Page 4: Comprehension presentation

Metacognition

•Thinking about thinking. Metacognition influences students’ reading achievement. As students proactively set goals, select and use strategies, and self-monitor they take control over their act of reading (Afflerbach, Cho, Kim, Crassas, & Doyle, 2013, p.441-442). Teachers guide students in developing thinking that is more deliberate by assisting them to realize how they are processing material. Readers can analyze their thinking process using techniques such as visualizing, questioning, and by synthesizing material. When teachers scaffold instruction and guide students through practice, these skills lead students to text understanding.

Page 5: Comprehension presentation

Motivation and Engagement

•Students are more motivated to read when teachers create meaningful and engaging instruction that supports student’s confidence. Teachers help students build confidence in their ability to comprehend by providing a learning environment that promotes students' independence and instruction on how reading strategies can be useful. Motivated readers choose to invest time and effort in the reading process—for information gathering, knowledge building, or personal enjoyment (Afflerbach, Cho, Kim, Crassas, & Doyle, 2013, p.443).

Page 6: Comprehension presentation

Motivation and Engagement

Page 7: Comprehension presentation

Epistemic Belief

A Students level of knowledge about a topic is often related to prior knowledge. Prior knowledge provides the schema and a framework for comprehension. By making literacy experiences more relevant to students' interests and everyday life, teachers are building reading comprehension. Instruction that allows students to study the knowledge they bring to reading and the knowledge they gained from reading builds comprehension and critical thinking (Afflerbach, Cho, Kim, Crassas, & Doyle, 2013, p.445). Instruction should involve student epistemic beliefs to encouraging interest and comprehension.

Page 8: Comprehension presentation

Self-Efficacy

•Self-efficacy relates to students’ judgments of their ability to perform at particular levels of achievement (Afflerbach, Cho, Kim, Crassas, & Doyle, 2013, p.445). If teachers emphasize student improvement and set realistic goals, students may feel more confident as readers.

Page 9: Comprehension presentation

The Teacher

•To ensure every child becomes fully literate, teacher address the needs of all learner whether struggling or advanced learners (Reutzel & Cooter, 2016). Effective teachers have the ability to adjust their instruction to meet the needs of the learners. Although comprehension strategies may focus on the same skills, knowledgeable teachers understand that instructional plans support students at their instructional level and is delivered in a way to motivate students to engage in learning. Dynamic teachers know their students, are aware of their differences and provide the supports needed for all students to be successful.

Page 10: Comprehension presentation

Instructional Strategies/Methods

•“The persistent challenge in using standards as a tool for educational reform is that standards alone do not yield change in instructional practice” (Hollenbeck & Saternus, 2013)•Instructional strategies are the methods teachers use to guide students’ learning. Models of research-based instructional activities feature graphic organizers, questioning, teacher modeling of “thinking aloud” and story maps. Teacher modeling is an essential element for student understanding of strategies they use as independent readers (Hallenbeck & Saternus, 2013).

Page 11: Comprehension presentation

Think Aloud

•“Think Aloud,” the first phase of a gradual release of responsibility, is a research-based instructional strategy that is critical to explicit comprehension instruction (Hollenbeck & Saternus, 2013). The teacher models how to use a particular strategy in a flexible and dynamic way to problem solve while reading, using language that assist students in hearing the inner language one has while reading (2013).

Page 12: Comprehension presentation

Graphic Organizers

•Graphic organizers provide a visual demonstration of the teacher's thinking (Hollenbeck & Saternus, 2013). Graphic organizers can be adapted for many strategies. They may be used to build comprehension skills before, during, and after reading. Using graphic organizers is a powerful routine for teachers to use during guided practice within the gradual release model (Reutzel & Cooter, 2016). Graphic organizers are useful tool to organize information from non-fiction text or to summarize a fictional text.

Page 13: Comprehension presentation

Instructional Strategies/Methods cont.

•Teachers must provide explicit teaching with clear and concise instructional methods. Using a carefully structured approach to introducing new skills, modeling new skills and allowing ample practice for students to demonstrate mastery of new learning. Comprehension instruction is scaffolded with a gradual release of responsibility allowing students time to build specific literacy concepts and skills (Reutzel & Cooter, 2016).

Page 14: Comprehension presentation

Instructional Strategies/Methods cont.

Page 15: Comprehension presentation

Informing Instruction

•When designing comprehension instruction it is vital to consider student reading levels, as well as the affective aspects. Appropriate instructional strategies lead the learner in discovering meaning while reading. Considering the affective behaviors, engage students and allow them to see their capabilities in using the strategies to comprehend progressively difficult text.

Page 16: Comprehension presentation

Comprehension Strategies

•For Students to become confident, strategic readers, they need to understand the advantages of comprehension strategies (Hollenbeck & Saternus, 2013, p. 563). Comprehension strategies support the reader in making sense of what they have read. Teachers use Instructional strategies, explicit instruction, and guided practice to teach the reader how to use comprehension strategies, providing opportunities for students to adopt these strategies in the reading process. The Common Core State Standard indicates summarizing and inferring as comprehension strategies used in grade four through grade six (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2012).

Page 17: Comprehension presentation

Comprehension Strategies cont.

Page 18: Comprehension presentation

Infer

•While reading, students use textual information as well as prior knowledge to aid them in understanding the text. A research-based practice that supports inferring is the Reading Response Journal (SDEL, 3013). This practice encourages the use of inferring strategies while reading and allows students to express their thoughts during the reading process. A Reader Response Journal will provide evidence of student use of the strategy based on individual prior knowledge and connections made with text. The Reading Response Journal affords students a chance to self-monitor their comprehension during reading, a critical skill for students (Laureate Education, 2014).

Page 19: Comprehension presentation

Infer

Page 20: Comprehension presentation

Summarize

•Summarizing is a key comprehension strategy that becomes more critical and more difficult in the intermediate grades (SDEL, 2013). In the intermediate grades text become progressively more challenging and reading purpose shifts to reading for knowledge, in the content area. Reading in the content areas demands solid reading comprehension skills. Vast amounts of information to remember and process makes summarizing a valued comprehension skill. A variety of tools can assist in summarizing. The SEDL suggested using graphic organizers and jigsaw strategies in collaborative groups (2013) The National Reading Panel recommends collaborative group activities to increases comprehension, motivation and engage students in learning (Laureate Education, 2014).

Page 21: Comprehension presentation

•One size does not fit all! Teachers work with children from diverse backgrounds, with a range of learning needs. Differentiated instruction, an accommodating specific approach to instruction is critical to student success. When a teacher alters her teaching to design the best possible learning experience for her students, she is differentiating instruction.

Differentiated Instruction

Page 22: Comprehension presentation

•Both comprehension and instructional strategies are easily modified for every unique learner’s needs. With additional support for struggling learners and differentiating text levels, all students will benefit. Students have different needs, and teachers need to adjust instruction to meet those needs.

Differentiated Instruction cont.

Page 23: Comprehension presentation

Differentiated Instruction

Page 24: Comprehension presentation

•Collaborative Strategic Reading (IRA, 2014a) is an instructional model where students, practice using comprehension tools in cooperative learning groups. The strategies used are: preview (predict), click and clunk (identify challenges and apply fix-up strategies), get the gist (find the main ideas), and wrap up (review new learning). Within the instructional structure, each process or strategy is taught explicitly, with teacher modeling and scaffolded instruction. Teachers guide the students through practice using the comprehension tools before using the combined approaches in independent student application.

Lesson Overview

Page 25: Comprehension presentation

•There are many factors that are vital in supporting learners in developing a toolbox of comprehension strategies. These factors focus on the purpose for reading using appropriate activities and explicit, scafoldded instruction to teach comprehension. The consideration of instructional methods that keep critical components in mind will benefit the student’s abilities to enhance comprehension.

Conclusion

Page 26: Comprehension presentation

• Afflerbach, P., Cho, B.-Y., Kim, J.-Y., Crassas, M. E., & Doyle, B. (2013). Reading: What else matters besides strategies and

skills? The Reading Teacher, 66 (6), 440–448.

• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2012b). English language arts standards: Reading: Foundational skills:

Kindergarten. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RF/K

• Hollenbeck, A. F., & Saternus, K. (2013). Mind the comprehension iceberg: Avoiding titanic mistakes with the CCSS. The

Reading Teacher, 66(7), 558–568.

• International Reading Association (IRA) and National Council of Teachers of English. (2014a). ReadWriteThink. Retrieved

from http://www.readwritethink.org/search/?grade=13&resource_type=6&learning_objective=8

• Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Conversations with Ray Reutzel: Supporting comprehension

[Audio file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

• SEDL. (2013). Cognitive elements of reading. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/reading/framework/elements.html

References