competition act amendments 2009: misleading advertising by bill hearn, mcmillan llp canadian...
TRANSCRIPT
Competition Act Amendments 2009:Misleading Advertising
By Bill Hearn, McMillan LLP
Canadian Marketing Association WebinarApril 14, 2009
Outline
• Overview of misleading advertising prohibition in Competition Act
• Where Bill C-10 has tightened the rules
• How Bill C-10 has increased fines, penalties and remedies for consumers
• Implications for marketers
Truth in Advertising 101
Misleading Advertising
• Tell the truth
• Have support for what you say
• Keep your promise
• In the heat of battle, make good decisions
MISLEADING ADVERTISING
Misleading Advertising
• Offence under Competition Act
• Both criminal and civil prohibitions
• Seriousness of offence and whether misrepresentation made “knowingly” or “recklessly” determines whether Bureau goes criminal track
Misleading Advertising
• “Representation” – broadly defined
• “Made to the public”
• Bill C-10 tightened rules/closed possible loopholes, making it not necessary to establish that:
- any person was misled
- anyone in Canada misled: Sticking it to Mr. Stucky, Ontario Court of Appeal decision February 17, 2009
- representation was made in a place where public had access: Competition Tribunal’s July 2008 decision in Premier Career Management Group case
Misleading Advertising
• False or misleading in a material respect
• Tests: False = Objective…Misleading = Subjective
• Literal meaning and general impression
• Disclaimers
MISLEADING ADVERTISING
Offence/Reviewable Practice
Maximum Penalty
Old New
Misleading Advertising (criminal)
Fine at the discretion of the court and/or five years imprisonment
Fine at the discretion of the court and/or 14 years imprisonment
Deceptive Marketing First OffenceSubsequent
OffencesFirst Offence
Subsequent Offences
Individuals 50,000 100,000 750,000 1,000,000
Businesses 100,000 200,000 10,000,000 15,000,000
Increased Penalties
Misleading Advertising
• Big penalty for civil offence
- Prospects for Charter challenge
- Implications for consent settlement agreements
- Avoiding litigation costs, personal criminal sanctions and multi-count violations
Other Consumer Remedies
• Competition Tribunal may:
- order restitution to victims of deceptive marketing practices
- freeze assets of accused business and prevent disposal of property before finding
• interim order likely where accused is not a sizeable and reputable business
Implications for Marketers
• Easier to prove offences
• Non-compliance more costly (in terms of liability for penalties imposed by regulator and damages awarded in private lawsuits)
• Should review and update marketing law compliance programs to mitigate risks
Bill HearnMcMillan LLPBrookfield Place181 Bay StreetSuite 4400Toronto, ON M5J 2T3
Tel: 416.865.7240Fax: 416.865.7048Email: [email protected]