competence assessment tool: a guide for marine protected...
TRANSCRIPT
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 1
SMARTSeas PH Project. 2018. Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and Marine Protected Area Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners. United Nations Development Program, Makati City, Philippines, pp 1-172.
UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. On the ground in more than 170 countries and territories, we offer global perspective and local insight to help empower lives and build resilient nations. www.undp.org
Published by:
SMARTSeas PH – A UNDP project in the Philippines implemented by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Biodiversity Management Bureau, and supported by the Global Environment Facility. UNDP Philippines
30th Floor Yuchengco Tower, RCBC Plaza, 6819Ayala Avenue cor. Sen. Gil J. Puyat Avenue, Makati City 1226
No part of this may be reproduced without the permission of the UNDP Philippines.
Cover Photo: Rizza SacraDesign and Layout: Rikki Lee B. Mendiola
In collaboration with SMARTSeas PH partners:
COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT TOOL
A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
Prepared by:University of the Philippines-Marine Science Institute
Key Contributors: Janine Bobadilla
Ma. Czarmayne Victoria Jude EscoroJue Alef Lalas
Bella Sheila AlbasinMaria Vanessa Baria-Rodriguez
Hazel ArceoPorfirio Aliño
For the Department of Environment and Natural Resources Biodiversity Management Bureauunder the United Nations Development Programme “Strengthening Marine Protected
Areas to Conserve Marine Key Biodiversity Areas in the Philippines” Project
October 2018
The Philippines lies within the Coral Triangle, which has been widely known as the center of marine biodiversity in the world. However, marine resources in the country are under increasing threats from anthropogenic activities (e.g., overfishing, pollution, sedimentation), large-scale disturbances (e.g., storms, exponential rise in global temperature), and the challenges brought about by climate change. Because of this, various stakeholders are doing different management interventions to conserve and protect the marine environment and resources. One of the most common strategies used is the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs). MPAs, as specified by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), are “clearly defined geographical spaces, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values” (Dudley, 2008).
The country, despite having more than 1,800 MPAs, has not yet achieved its biodiversity and fisheries objectives due to the mismanagement of its natural resources. One crucial aspect attributed to this is the lack of capacity among the management bodies and their members to perform MPA-related tasks and responsibilities. This highlights the need to ensure that people involved in these MPAs should be effective and competent. Concomitant to these imperatives are systemic concerns that need to be addressed by: (1) removing governance barriers that may hinder progressive development; (2) providing institutional policy reforms; (3) transforming the socioecological systems with enabling conditions; and, (4) providing adequate investment on capacitating protected area managers and practitioners.
Preface
The Competence Assessment Tool was developed as part of the Monitoring and Evaluation of MPAs and MPA Networks (MPANs), particularly in the governance aspect, to capacitate protected area managers and practitioners. Competence translates to the ability of an individual to do a certain task or job. This is the integration of appropriate skills, knowledge, and attitude to successfully perform one’s tasks and functions. The tool has undergone various revisions, pretesting, workshops, and consultations to make it as simple as possible, yet still comprehensive. The competencies are grouped into five main components based on MPA/N-related roles and responsibilities: (1) Planning, (2) Financing, (3) Communications, (4) Enforcement, and (5) Monitoring and Evaluation. These functions are relevant to effectively manage MPAs and MPANs in the Philippines. Moreover, these competencies are classified according to different personnel categories: (1) executives, (2) senior managers, (3) technical specialists, and (4) skilled workers. All competencies are integrated with governance principles for effective management, which involve functionality, transparency, accountability, and participatory decision-making.
The Competence Assessment Tool is not a checklist of requirements to accomplish. Instead, it is a set of building blocks that can guide and open opportunities for better protected area management. The tool is intended to be generally applicable to a wide range of organizational structures and scales albeit its administrative (i.e., psychosocial dimension of MPA management), political, and institutional context needs to be nuanced. The ultimate goal of the tool is to translate these competencies into strategies that would sustain and institutionalize MPA management toward a better future for generations to come.
This Competence Assessment Tool and Guidebook was prepared by the University of the Philippines – Marine Science Institute under the Community Ecology Laboratory (COMECO Lab) through the SMARTSeas PH Project, a UNDP Project in the Philippines implemented by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources – Biodiversity Management Bureau (DENR-BMB) and supported by the Global Environment Facility (GEF).
Completing the guidebook took more than a year and the team would like to thank the many people who have been instrumental in crafting and completing it. Ms. Grace Tena of UNDP and the Project Management Unit (PMU) of the SMARTSeas PH Project, led by Dr. Vincent Hilomen, who have been very proactive with the development of the tool. Ms. Norievill España, who has been our constant link to the PMU, UNDP, BMB, and the responsible partners at the site. Past and present project staff of the COMECO Lab, namely, Melchor Jacinto, Rhea Mae Luciano, Lora Faith Batino, Erlo Matorres, Abejoy Perez, Tom Gerald Genovia, Sheryl Vinluan and Mhaolene Palevino. In the final stretch, Dr.
Acknowledgement
Cecilia Gastardo-Conaco, provided valuable inputs in making the tool simpler, yet more comprehensive and understandable to our target people.
Our SMARTSeas PH responsible partners who provided coordination and logistical support when we visited the sites, namely, the Conservation International - Philippines, the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources – National Fisheries Research Development Institute, the Rare Philippines, the Haribon Foundation, and the World Wildlife Fund – Philippines.
Last but not the least, we would like to extend our sincerest gratitude to the people in the local government units, coastal communities, and MPA management bodies, who participated in the workshops, pre-testing and interviews for the application of the tool in the SMARTSeas PH sites in Davao Gulf, Lanuza Bay, Tañon Strait, Verde Island Passage, and Southern Palawan. The inputs and learnings from these marine key biodiversity areas helped mold the tool in its current form, making it more applicable and useful in the Philippine coastal context.
6 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
Table of Contents
PREFACE
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
INTRODUCTION
DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOOL
THE COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT TOOL
What is the Competence Assessment Tool?Who can use the Competence Assessment Tool?How to use the Competence Assessment Tool?
General ProcessThe ToolkitScoring, Interpretation and Sample OutputRecommended Training Modules
REFERENCES
PART 2: COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT TOOL KIT
Instruction and Personal Data SheetSelf-Assessment Forms
Personnel Category APersonnel Category BPersonnel Category CPersonnel Category D
Evaluation Result SheetGuide to Administering the Tool and Scoring
Personnel Category APersonnel Category BPersonnel Category CPersonnel Category D
3481011
23252727385877929797109127144
21
11111414151920
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 7
COMPETENCE GUIDELINESPART 1
8 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
Introduction
Background and Overview
Competence refers to the ability of an individual to do a certain task. It is a function of appropriate skills,
Various sectors and organizations are now setting up standards for the competencies required to accomplish work-related functions. The need forthe development of competence standards for MPA managers has been highlighted by Gill et al. (2017), who determined that staff and budget capacity were the strongest predictors of conservation impacts. MPAs with adequate staff capacity had ecological effects 2.9 times greater than MPAs with inadequate capacity (Gill et al., 2017). To effectively and equitably manage MPAs, there has to be an appropriate investment on human resources that is not just focused on capacity nor quantity of manpower, but also on the knowledge, skills, and the right working attitude of the MPA managers (Figure 2).
Figure 1. Skills-Knowledge-Attitude model for competency (Appleton, 2016)
knowledge, and attitude to successfully perform work-related duties and activities (Figure 1).
Figure 3 shows the difference between the conventional and competence approaches in training, learning, and assessment. This tool utilizes a competence-based approach, which focuses on the actual ability and performance of an individual based on the behavior rather than the acquisition of knowledge. In this approach, the competence standards help build and strengthen the skills of the individual. Nevertheless, competence and performance still require a good foundation of knowledge (Appleton, 2015). Competence standards can ultimately feed into training needs assessment, which serves as a diagnostic tool that determines what trainings are necessary to help achieve protected area goals and objectives.
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 9
Figure 2. Human resource capacity as strongest predictors of conservation impacts (Gill et al., 2017)
Figure 3. . Comparison between conventional and competence approaches to training, learning, and assessment (Appleton, 2015)
10 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
Development of the tool
The development of the Competence Assessment Tool followed a rigorous process of reviewing existing literatures, multiple pretesting and consultations, and finalization and packaging (Figure 4) to ensure its simplicity, comprehensiveness, and applicability to a wide range of MPA/N contexts. During the initial phase of the SMARTSeas PH project, baseline information was collected from existing management plans of locally managed MPAs (LM-MPAs), MPANs, and National Integrated Protected Area System (NIPAS) MPAs. These include existing management structure, emerging roles, and responsibilities of different individuals and committees that are part of the management. A literature
review on competence standards was made to gather information on existing concepts, strategies, and tools. In particular, competence standards that incorporate threat reduction, functionality of an effective MPA/N, and human resource competencies were consolidated. Some of the main references used to develop the competence standards were “Competence Standards for Protected Area Jobs in South East Asia” compiled by the ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation (Appleton et al., 2003) and the “A Global Register of Competencies for Protected Area Practitioners” published by IUCN (Appleton, 2016). After reviewing the different materials available, a suite of competencies critical for the
Figure 4. General process on the development of the Competence Assessment Tool
management of MPAN was identified, including the steps on how to administer assessments and data analyses.
To eliminate unnecessary criteria and incorporate relevant components to the tool, consultation activities such as meetings and workshops were done. Participants of these activities were mostly individuals with direct or indirect involvement in managing MPA/Ns such as MPA/N managers, MPA/N management representatives, local government units (LGUs), nongovernment organizations (NGOs), national government agencies (NGAs) such as the Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR), the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), and the experts from different fields of MPA management. Suggestions and comments from the
participants of these activities were documented and integrated to enhance the tool.
The Competence Assessment Tool has undergone several pretesting activities done through focus group discussions (FGDs), interviews (guided self-assessment), and self-assessment in sites with varying management effectiveness level, and management types (i.e., locally managed MPAs, nationally managed MPAs, and network of MPAs). The pretesting further enhanced the tool by streamlining appropriate competencies and criteria––as well as by evaluating how the assessment should be best administered, verifying if the guide questions and facilitator’s guide were appropriate, and validating the proper scoring system to be used.
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 11
The Competence Assessment Tool
What is the Competence Assessment Tool?
Competence assessment is an integral part of the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system for MPAs and MPANs. It facilitates the identification and prioritization of the competencies needed to achieve the objectives of MPA/Ns and ensure effectiveness. An initial part of the M&E system is knowing the status of existing threats in the area, specifically by determining the urgency of the threats and how the management group is capable to address these. Through this assessment, the management group will be able to determine the competencies that they potentially have or lack. The competence assessment complements other existing approaches to determine MPA/N management effectiveness, such as the performance of the MPA management body as a group through the administration of the MPA Management Effectiveness Assessment Tool (MEAT), the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT), the MPA Network Effectiveness Assessment Tool (NEAT), or assessment of ecological and socioeconomic impacts (e.g., Socioeconomic Assessment Tool or SEAT).
Specifically, the Competence Assessment Tool for MPA/N Managers and Practitioners is an instrument to assess the current level of knowledge, skills and work attitudes of its managers and practitioners. It assists in determining and designing trainings and other capacity building activities through the identification of competencies, or the lack thereof. The tool can also help improve human resource management through the development of detailed job descriptions and proper design of organizational structures, personnel roles and responsibilities, and the professionalization of protected area jobs by setting competence standards.
It is important to note that this tool does not intend to set rules, nor evaluate or rate the performance of the individual MPA/N managers. Instead, it provides guidance to managers in improving their collective capacities to perform the assigned duties and responsibilities in the management group. The fundamental motivation is to help individuals and
organizations adopt the “competence-based approach” as a practical way to build capacity and to improve standards and performance.
At present, the Competence Assessment Tool includes 40 competencies and 236 criteria spread across the five main components based on MPA/N-related roles and responsibilities: (1) Planning, (2) Financing, (3) Communications, (4) Enforcement, and (5) Monitoring and Evaluation. The Planning component focuses on providing a rationale and strategically planned framework and activities for MPA/N governance and management, which always considers a participatory approach to make sure that everyone is involved in the planning process. The Financing component looks into ensuring that the MPA/N is sustainably financed and supported, as well as having an efficient and effective financial management system. The Communications component makes sure that the personnel categories communicate and collaborate effectively. The Enforcement component ensures that laws, regulations and rights concerning MPA/N are effectively upheld and adapted. Lastly, the Monitoring and Evaluation component looks into the essential competencies to monitor and evaluate the governance, socioeconomic and ecological aspect of the MPA/N. The set of competencies and criteria vary among four different personnel categories in MPA/N management: (1) executives, (2) senior managers, (3) technical specialists, and (4) skilled workers as presented in the next section.
Who can use the Competence Assessment Tool?
The tool has been primarily developed for MPA/N managers and practitioners. These are the persons who have direct or indirect involvement in establishing and maintaining the MPA/N. Managers and practitioners are divided into personnel categories based on the roles
Manager - an individual responsible for controlling and administering a certain group
Practitioner - an individual actively engaged in a certain field of profession
12 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
and responsibilities of the individuals to the MPA/N and not on the job item they have in their respective organizations. Table 1 shows the four personnel categories, their general roles and responsibilities, and sample office and/or designated officials.
In the Philippines, managers of MPAs are usually composed of individuals working for the LGUs. However, the organizational structure or setup varies from place to place. For example, some MPAs might involve people working for the LGUs only, while others may involve people from higher offices, such as from the province or the region. Some MPAs might also involve social groups, such as people’s organizations (POs). Meanwhile, other MPAs, such as MPAs under the NIPAS Act (Republic Act No. 7586) and MPANs, may have different organizational
structures and institutional arrangements. The main advantage of this tool is that it has been designed for different types of MPA management systems. Figures 6-8 show the organizational structures of MPA/N with clear and distinguishable differences in their management.
In Tagum City (Figure 5), the head of the MPA management is the mayor who is jointly working with the city council and external groups, such as the academe, NGOs and other government agencies (GAs). It can be seen in the structure that the mayor has tasked the City Environment and Natural Resources Office (CENRO) to take the lead in the MPA management. In this type of structure, it can be assumed that the mayor and the city council are the executives working for the MPA––the CENRO is the senior manager, while the technical
Personnel Category Typical Title Roles and Responsibilities Sample Office with
the Designated Officials
A Executive
• Direction and management of large organizations
• Involve in policy development, spatial and strategic planning
• Cross-sectoral coordination• Direction of complex programs and
plans• Involve in executive and/or legislative
works
Nationally managed MPAs: Regional Director and Assistant Regional Director
Locally managed MPA/N:Governor, Vice Governor, Sangguniang Panlalawigan;Mayor, Vice Mayor, Sangguniang Bayan
B Senior manager
• Direction and management of medium-size organizations
• Planning and management of projects and programs within strategic frameworks
• Conducting and leading complex and technical programs (according to specialization)
Nationally managed MPAs: Protected Area Superintendent (PASu), Assistant PASu and Protected Area Coordinator, PENRO, CENRO
Locally managed MPA/N:MAO, MENRO, Fisheries Office, CRM Office, Planning Office, MPA/N Coordinator
C Technical specialist
• Management, organization and leadership of technical sections and teams implementing plans and projects
• Completing specific and complex technical assignments (according to technical specialization)
Planning officer, Administrative officer, Accountant/Treasurer, Head ranger/enforcer, Conservation officer, M&E specialist, Agricultural technician, Fisheries technician, Research assistant, PO officers, MFARMC
D Skilled worker• Completing practical tasks under
continuous supervisionBantay Dagat, tour guides, bookkeeper, junior technicians, administrative aide, laboratory technician, PO members
Table 1. Personnel categories and their descriptions with sample positions (slight modification from Appleton, 2016).
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 13
specialists and the skilled workers are individuals under the “coastal management unit/MPA in charge.”
Batangas Network has a different structure (Figure 6) since it is a network of coastal LGUs led by the provincial
government. The Batangas Provincial Government – Environment and Natural Resources Office (PG-ENRO) is the focal office that directly implement joint action strategies and/or programs and projects for coastal
Figure 5. Organizational structure of the management board of the MPAs in Tagum City, Davao del Norte, Philippines. (Image copied from the MPA management plan document of Tagum City)
Figure 6. Organizational structure of the management board of Batangas MPA and Bantay-Dagat Network(Source: Batangas PG-ENRO).
14 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
resource management as indicated in their strategic environment management plan.
The management structure of Tañon Strait Protected Seascape (TSPS) (Figure 7), a NIPAS MPA, is also very much different from the aforementioned two since it is a very large protected area located in the provinces of Cebu, Negros Oriental, and Negros Occidental. The administration of TSPS is under the management of the Protected Area Management Board, a multi-sectoral and decision-making body headed by the DENR Regional Director, Protected Area Superintendent (PASU) and five assistant PASU with about 320 representatives from component LGUs and stakeholders i.e. city/municipal/barangay LGUs, academe, POs, NGOs and NGAs.
Figure 7. Organizational structure of the Protected Area Management Board (PAMB) of the Tañon Strait Protected Seascape (TSPS), a marine protected area under the National Protected Areas System (NIPAS) (Image copied from Tañonstrait.org)
The Competence Assessment Tool is an adaptive management strategy where MPA/N managers and practitioners can learn and improve from the whole assessment process. LGUs, academic institutions, NGAs and NGOs can also use this tool as a guide to determine areas where they could best provide support (i.e., capacity building, training), while enhancing particular competencies that demand further improvement.
How to use the Competence Assessment Tool?
General Process
The approved organizational structure of the MPA/N management body is the basic reference to carry out the
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 15
competence assessment. Examples of organizational structures are shown in Figures 5-7. This is to identify all the personnel involved in the management of the MPA/N and determine which personnel category they belong to (refer to Table 1). Note that the personnel category of an individual should be based on his/her responsibility to the MPA management and not on the actual job ascribed for office. For example, the Municipal Agriculture Officer (MAO) of the LGU is designated as MPA coordinator. Consequently, that individual should be assessed based on his/her competencies as MPA coordinator and not as MAO. In other areas, however, leaders of social groups who are part of the management’s executive committees may also fulfill additional roles not part of the executive work for the MPA.
The next step is to identify what competencies are relevant to their responsibilities. Note that an individual may have a role in only one component with some overlapping or common roles, tasks, and responsibilities with other components. Meanwhile, others may have roles in multiple components with well-defined responsibilities and leadership functions. A municipal mayor, for instance, could take a role across all components, with varying set of competencies; but a hired MPA guard could only have a specific role in participatory planning and enforcement.
MPA/N managers and practitioners will be assessed individually. The Competence Assessment Tool was designed for both independent self-assessment (an individual will answer the guide questions independently) and guided self-assessment (an individual will be interviewed by a facilitator or guide). The individual to be evaluated should first understand the purpose of the assessment before it is conducted. The facilitator should ensure privacy while administering the assessment¬––whether self or guided self-assessment. During guided self-assessment, the individual should be interviewed alone so that he/she will be able to answer freely without pressure from an audience or his/her colleagues. The facilitator should also ensure that the process of eliciting independent evaluation promotes the credibility of the process. If an individual cannot answer the question, he/she is allowed to leave it blank or indicate “Not Applicable” (N/A) instead of asking answers from someone else. Always take note that this is a personal competence assessment toward MPA/N management; hence, full honesty is encouraged to reflect
Figure 8. Instruction and personal data sheet.
the appropriate competence of an individual.
Ideally, the tool should be conducted every year to regularly monitor the capacity of the MPA/N managers and practitioners. A baseline competence assessment is essential to have a reference point for comparison on the level of improvement of a personnel’s performance over time. It can also be aligned with the schedule of MPA MEAT assessment to monitor both the individual and the management performances.
The Toolkit
The Competence Assessment Tool is composed of: (A) instruction and personal data sheet, (B) self-assessment forms for Categories A, B, C and D, (C) evaluation
16 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
Figure 9. Sample self-assessment form (top to bottom): knowledge criteria, skills criteria with checklist, and work attitudes criteria
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 17
result sheet, and (D) guide to administering the tool and scoring for Categories A, B C and D. These are all part of the toolkit and are presented in the second part of this guidebook. The data sheet and the assessment form are given to the individual to be evaluated. The result sheet contains the summary of the scores obtained in each component with accompanying recommendations. This sheet will be given by the facilitator to the individual after his/her evaluation form has been scored and analyzed. Meanwhile, the guide to administering the tool and scoring should only be seen by the facilitator. The scoring system per criterion is also shown in this section.
Figure 8 shows the instruction and personal data sheet, which is to be filled up by the individual under evaluation. This section provides the facilitator with an idea about the individual’s background. Figure 9 shows a sample assessment form. The first and second images show sample criteria for knowledge and skills, respectively. Each criterion is properly coded based on what component it belongs. The assessment form consists mostly of open-ended questions, but there are some checklists in the monitoring and evaluation component to easily identify training requirements. The last image shows the work attitude criteria, which is to be answered
Figure 10. Evaluation results sheet.
Figure 11. Guide to administering the tool and scoring.
18 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
by rating oneself. The attitude criteria were separated from the knowledge and skills since these are more personal characteristics of an individual. These criteria are also categorized per MPA/N component (color-coded), but a set of general work attitudes cutting across
Criteria Total Score Competence Level* RemarksKnowledge 39 HighSkills 22 High
Attitude 27 Moderate
* Total Score (COMPETENCE LEVEL):
KNOWLEDGE 0-16–LOW 17-32–MODERATE 33-48–HIGH SKILLS 0-10–LOW 11-20–MODERATE 21-30–HIGH ATTITUDE 0-16–LOW 17-32–MODERATE 33-48–HIGH
Table 2. Sample assessment result showing a Category D competence level per criteria.
all components were also added. The work attitudes are stated as “I statements” and should be answered personally. The personnel will assess himself/herself whether he/she does the attitude part all the time, most of the time, sometimes or not at all.
CriteriaKnowledge (K) Skills (S) Attitude (A)
Total Available
ScoreActual Score % Actual
Score
Total Available
ScoreActual Score % Actual
Score
Total Available
ScoreActual Score % Actual
Score
1. Planning 10 8 80% 4 3 75% 0 0
2. Financing 4 3 75% 4 3 75% 9 8 89%
3. Communications 2 2 100% 7 5 71% 3 3 100%
4. Enforcement 18 15 83% 7 5 71% 15 14 93%
5. Monitoring and Evaluation 14 11 79% 8 6 75% 3 2 67%
Total Score 48 39 81% 30 22 73% 30 27 90%
Attitudes (General) 18 15 83%
Positivity to Work (All Work Attitudes) 48 42 88%
Table 2. Sample assessment result showing a Category D competence level per criteria.
The summary of the competence assessment results is shown in the evaluation results sheet (Figure 10). At the end of the competence assessment, an individual’s level of competence will be categorized as low, moderate, or high. Each personnel category will have its own results sheet since the total scores vary per personnel. Scores are broken down according to criteria and component to easily visualize which aspect an individual excels at or needs further training and capacity development. Recommendations from the facilitator are also presented here.
The facilitator’s guide in administering the tool is shown in Figure 11. The guide contains all the relevant information needed to help facilitate the conduct of the Competence Assessment Tool. The guide questions are provided with checklists of possible answers and tips on how to ask the questions, especially for guided assessments. The scoring system for each competency is also indicated. Scoring varies per competency depending on the degree of relevance of the criteria. Maximum allowable points are identified, as well.
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 19
Scoring, Interpretation, and Sample Output
Each personnel category has a scoring system to identify the competence level since the total number of competencies and criteria vary per category. Table 2 shows a sample output for a Category D personnel. Competence level per criteria is based on a rubric, which indicates whether an individual has a low, moderate or high competence level.
The percentage of the actual score to the total available score is derived from the scores of the criteria for each component. An example output is shown below. Table 3 indicates the scores per component and per criterion. One can take a look back at the score sheet to identify
Figure 12. Bar graph showing competence level per criterion
Figure 13. Spider diagram showing competence level per criterion.
20 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
what specific criteria were not satisfied, and use this information to properly design capacity building activities. Results can also be presented through bar graphs (Figure 12) and spider diagram (Figure 13).
Recommended Training Modules
One of the uses of the Competence Assessment Tool is for the design of training and capacity development. The focus of these trainings and capacity building activities leads to the fulfillment of unsatisfied criteria to improve the individual’s competency level as shown in Table 6. In line with this, the SMARTSeas PH Project recommends the capacity building training modules being developed by the Coastal Assessment for Rehabilitation Enhancement: Capacity Development and Resiliency of EcoSystems (CARE CADRES) Project under the Coastal and Marine Environment Management Program (CMEMP) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. One of the objectives of the project was to develop and/or update existing capacity building training modules on several thematic areas based on the existing materials. Ten out of the twelve modules are deemed relevant training modules for the capacity development related to improving the competence of the MPA/N managers and practitioners.
For the Planning component, the recommended training modules consist of: (A) applying Drivers, Pressures, State, Impacts and Response (DPSIR) Approach in marine ecosystems and (B) strategic planning. These modules focus on using a systematic approach to make the most effective choices about the MPA/N’s objectives and the use of appropriate strategies to achieve them. The strategic development of a management plan is included in these modules.
Communications is also part of the Strategic Planning Module, specifically called the Strategic Communications Planning. This module highlights the importance of communication as a vital process in the effective management of natural resources. Planning, establishing and sustaining MPA/N will be successful if there is effective communications. MPA Financing is part of the main focus of the Sustainable Financing Module and is broadly discussed in the Strategic Planning Module. The Sustainable
Financing Module aims to provide a clear understanding of Sustainable Financing in the context of MPAs. It also discusses financial and business planning, and the appreciation of economic valuation as an input to financing.
Enforcement also has its own module and is explained in the Strategic Planning Module, as well. The Law Enforcement Training Module discusses how to establish the enforcement program, which includes different investigation tools such as enforcement planning, strengthening enforcement, and sustaining enforcement and its institutionalization.
Lastly, for the Monitoring and Evaluation component, there are six relevant training modules: (A) Reconnaissance and Survey Assessment Module, (B) Coastal Integrity and Vulnerability Assessment Module, (C) Mangrove Habitat Module, (D) Seagrass Habitat Module, (E) Coral Reef Habitat Module, and (F) Associated Fish Communities Module. These modules concentrates more on monitoring and assessment of different critical habitats, as well as coastal beach surveys and methods for preliminary research and development.
The aforementioned modules were mostly based on existing materials enumerated below:
Major sources of these materials consist of the following programs and projects:
1. Tropical Marine Ecosystems Management Program (TMEM)
2. Philippine Environmental Governance Project (ECOGOV)
3. Coral Reef Visualization and Assessment Project Year 1 (CORVA-1)
4. Coral Reef Target Research Project (CRTR); and5. Coastal Resource Management Project (CRMP)
• Appreciation of the Basic Concepts of Coastal Methods of Assessment with actual video clips of marine ecosystems and Marine Ecology with focus on Restoration, Rehabilitation and Integrated Coastal Management–for piloting (TMEM; ECOGOV; CORVA-1)
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 21
References
Appleton, M. R. (2016). A Global Register of Competences for Protected Area Practitioners. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Appleton, M. R. (2015). Global Register of Protected Area Competences and User Guide. Version 3. WCPA.
Appleton, M. R., Texon, G.I. & Uriarte, M.T. (2003) Competence Standards for Protected Area Jobs in South East Asia. ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, Los Baños, Philippines. 104pp.
Dudley, N. (Ed.). (2008). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature. x + 86pp.
Gill, D., Mascia, M. B., Ahmadia, G. N., Glew, L., Lester, S. E., Barnes, M., Craigie, I., Darling, E. S., Free, C.M., Geldmann, J., Holst, S., Jensen, O. P., White, A.T., Basurto, X., Coad, L., Gates, R. D., Guannel, G., Mumby, P. J., Thomas, H., Whitmee, S., Woodley, S., & Fox, H. E. (2017). Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543: 665-669.
• Methods of Monitoring and state of the coasts reporting (Uychiaoco et al., 2004; CORVA-1)
• Approaches to Recovery and Rehabilitation of Marine Ecosystems (CRTR)
• Elements of a Good Management Plan (TMEM)• Implementation of Management Plan (TMEM)
• Strategic Planning (TMEM)• Social Marketing and Mobilization (TMEM)• Social Entrepreneurship and Resource-Based
Livelihood (TMEM)• Community Organizing (UP College of Social Work
and Community Development)• Law Enforcement (CRMP; ECOGOV)
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 23
COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT TOOL
PART 2
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 25
INSTRUCTION AND PERSONAL DATA SHEET
Dear SIR/ MADAM, GREETINGS! You have been requested to answer this questionnaire because you are doing an important job for your Marine Protected Area (MPA)/MPA Network (MPAN). Whether you are new or have been doing it for a long time, you probably know that there are no small tasks when it comes to managing the marine resources since it requires, not only considerable knowledge and skills, but also essential work attitudes that enable you to do your work effectively and efficiently. This Competence Assessment Tool aims to help gauge your current level of knowledge, skills and attitudes in performing your assigned duties and responsibilities for the MPA/N. More importantly, this assessment is being done to help determine and design future trainings and other capacity building activities, and enable you to perform your best in your designated position and contribute to the achievement of the vision, goals and objectives of your MPA/N. Thus, the objective is NOT to evaluate or rate your performance, but rather to determine ways to enhance your knowledge and skills. There is no “passing grade.” You may answer in any language or dialect that you think would best reflect your ideas. Please go over the questions carefully and answer them as honestly as you can. Rest assured that all your answers will be treated with confidence. Thank you very much for your time and patience. Sincerely, FACILITATOR Name:__________________________________________________No.ofYearsinService:_______Office/Designation:_________________________________________________________________NameofMPA/Nbeingmanaged:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________SpecifictasksrelatedtoMPA/Nmanagement:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Mywork(100%)canbedividedinto: Planning____%Financing____% Communications____%Enforcement____%MonitoringandEvaluation_____%Educationallevel:___Elementarylevel ___Highschoollevel ___Highschoolgraduate ___Collegelevel___Collegegraduate ___Post-graduateNameoflasttrainingattended:________________________________________________________Whenwasitconducted:_______________________________Dateaccomplished:____________________________________________________Facilitator’sName(ifapplicable):_________________________________________
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 27
SELF-ASSESSMENT FORMS Personnel Category A
Page
| 1
PERS
ONNE
L CAT
EGOR
Y A
PLAN
NING
1.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
the
deve
lopm
ent,
revi
ew a
nd im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
P1-K
1. S
tate
and
im
port
ance
of c
oast
al
and
mar
ine
reso
urce
s
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of th
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces i
n yo
ur a
rea?
W
hat i
s the
impo
rtan
ce o
f est
ablis
hing
M
PA/N
s?
P1-K
2. M
PA/N
etw
ork
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t was
you
r rol
e in
the
deve
lopm
ent p
roce
ss o
f you
r MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s add
ress
ed
by y
our M
PA/N
? W
hat a
re th
e m
ost i
mpo
rtan
t co
mpo
nent
s of t
he m
anag
emen
t pla
n (e
.g. M
&E,
enf
orce
men
t, et
c.)?
P1
-S1.
Att
entio
n to
de
tail
in re
view
ing
and
upda
ting
the
man
agem
ent p
lan
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at th
e pl
an is
ad
equa
tely
revi
ewed
and
upd
ated
? Br
iefly
des
crib
e th
e pr
oces
s.
Ho
w o
ften
is it
revi
ewed
and
upd
ated
?
Page
| 2
P1-S
2. D
raw
less
ons
from
MPA
/N b
est
prac
tices
Plea
se ci
te M
PA/N
bes
t pra
ctice
s in
your
are
a or
oth
er p
lace
s.
Are
you
adop
ting
thes
e pr
actic
es in
yo
ur a
rea?
P1
-S3.
Lead
ersh
ip
and
decis
ion-
mak
ing
skill
s
Can
you
cite
inst
ance
s whe
n yo
u ha
d to
mak
e de
cisio
ns a
bout
MPA
/N
impl
emen
tatio
n?
W
ere
you
able
to m
ake
your
par
tner
s an
d te
am m
embe
rs a
gree
with
you
r de
cisio
n?
How
do
you
mot
ivat
e th
e M
PA/N
m
anag
emen
t bod
y an
d ot
her
stak
ehol
ders
to su
stai
n th
eir e
ffort
s for
th
e M
PA/N
?
2. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e ad
optio
n of
man
agem
ent p
lan
and
supp
ortin
g po
licie
s/le
gisla
tion
P2
-K3.
Effe
ctiv
e po
licie
s tha
t pro
vide
be
nefit
s to
MPA
/Ns
Wha
t pol
icies
shou
ld b
e in
pla
ce to
su
ppor
t and
/or c
ompl
emen
t the
M
PA/N
?
Are
thes
e po
licie
s cur
rent
ly b
eing
im
plem
ente
d in
you
r are
a?
P2-K
4. P
roce
dure
s an
d ap
prov
al o
f po
licie
s, le
gisla
tions
an
d iss
uanc
es in
su
ppor
ting
MPA
/Ns
Wha
t are
the
step
s nee
ded
for t
he
enac
tmen
t/ad
optio
n of
: 1.
the
man
agem
ent p
lan?
2.
the
polic
ies s
uppo
rtin
g M
PA/N
im
plem
enta
tion?
Page
| 3
Wha
t was
you
r par
ticip
atio
n in
the
enac
tmen
t and
/or a
dopt
ion
of th
e m
anag
emen
t pla
n an
d po
licie
s?
P2
-S4.
Att
entio
n to
de
tail
in a
dopt
ing
prot
ecte
d ar
ea p
olicy
an
d le
gisla
tion
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at th
e or
dina
nce/
polic
y is
suffi
cient
in fo
rm
and
subs
tanc
e?
FINA
NCIN
G 3.
Com
pete
ncy:
Abl
e to
mob
ilize
sust
aina
ble
fund
ing a
nd re
sour
ces f
or p
rote
cted
are
as
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
F3-K
5. S
tatu
s of
exist
ing
MPA
/Ns a
nd
thei
r fin
ancia
l nee
ds
Wha
t are
the
finan
cial n
eeds
of y
our
MPA
/N?
Can
you
nam
e so
me
of th
em
(e.g
. enf
orce
men
t inc
ludi
ng d
urin
g lit
igat
ion
proc
ess,
M&
E, IE
C,
infra
stru
ctur
e, e
tc.)?
Are
ther
e fu
nds t
o su
fficie
ntly
supp
ort
thes
e ne
eds?
Exp
lain
you
r ans
wer
.
F3
-K6.
Opt
ion
for
sour
ces o
f fun
ds a
nd
reso
urce
s to
supp
ort
the
MPA
/N
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
sour
ces o
f fu
nds/
reso
urce
s to
supp
ort t
he
prog
ram
s and
act
iviti
es o
f the
MPA
/N?
Cite
spec
ific e
xam
ples
.
F3-K
7. E
ffect
ive
polic
ies a
nd
stra
tegi
es to
ens
ure
finan
cial a
nd lo
gist
ic su
ppor
t to
MPA
/Ns
Wha
t pol
icies
/str
ateg
ies s
houl
d be
in
plac
e to
ens
ure
that
fund
s are
pr
ovid
ed fo
r the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e M
PA/N
?
Page
| 4
Are
thes
e be
ing
impl
emen
ted
in y
our
MPA
/N?
If ye
s, cit
e w
hich
one
s.
F3
-S5.
Allo
cate
, m
obili
ze a
nd
outs
ourc
e fu
nds a
nd
reso
urce
s for
MPA
/N
How
do
you
allo
cate
and
prio
ritize
fu
nds a
nd re
sour
ces f
or th
e M
PA/N
?
Ho
w d
o yo
u he
lp g
ener
ate
fund
s/re
sour
ces f
or th
e M
PA/N
?
F3
-S6.
Ens
ure
sust
aina
ble
use
of
fund
s for
the
MPA
/N
How
do
you
ensu
re th
e su
stai
nabl
e us
e of
fund
s and
reso
urce
s to
supp
ort
the
prog
ram
s and
act
iviti
es o
f the
M
PA/N
? Ci
te sp
ecifi
c exa
mpl
es.
COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
4.
Com
pete
ncy:
Fos
ter a
war
enes
s, un
ders
tand
ing
and
supp
ort o
f and
for t
he M
PA/N
syst
em a
nd it
s val
ues
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
C4-K
8. M
PA/N
in
form
atio
n th
at
need
s to
be
com
mun
icate
d w
ithin
and
out
side
the
man
agem
ent
body
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant
conc
epts
/info
rmat
ion
abou
t MPA
/Ns
that
the
peop
le/c
omm
unity
shou
ld
know
abo
ut?
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut
the
MPA
/N in
you
r are
a?
C4-K
9. E
ffect
ive
polic
ies t
hat p
rovi
de
bene
fits t
o th
e M
PA/N
Wha
t are
the
supp
ortin
g po
licie
s and
le
gisla
tions
for y
our M
PA/N
s tha
t sh
ould
be
wel
l-diss
emin
ated
?
Are
you
seei
ng b
enef
its fr
om th
ese
polic
ies?
Why
do
you
thin
k so
?
Page
| 5
C4-S
7. E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
harn
ess s
uppo
rt fo
r the
M
PA/N
?
If th
ere
are
peop
le w
ho d
o no
t sup
port
th
e M
PA/N
, how
do
you
deal
and
co
mm
unica
te w
ith th
em?
Cite
ex
ampl
es.
C4-S
8. C
oord
inat
ion
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u en
gage
with
mem
bers
of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y? W
hy
did
you
enga
ge (e
.g. a
ppro
val o
f the
m
anag
emen
t pla
n, te
am b
uild
ing,
de
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an,
enfo
rcem
ent,
etc.
) with
them
?
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs
and
othe
r age
ncie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N?
Why
did
yo
u en
gage
(see
k fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t, de
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an, p
rodu
ctio
n of
IEC
mat
eria
ls, e
ncou
rage
pa
rtici
patio
n, jo
int e
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
) w
ith th
em?
C4
-S9.
Peo
ple
skill
s De
scrib
e yo
ur w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
p w
ith 1
) mem
bers
of t
he m
anag
emen
t bo
dy a
nd 2
) sta
keho
lder
s.
Page
| 6
How
do
you
hand
le d
isagr
eem
ents
be
twee
n m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
or
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y?
C4
-S10
. Abl
e to
in
fluen
ce
How
do
you
influ
ence
oth
ers t
o pa
rtici
pate
in th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent
and
impl
emen
tatio
n?
ENFO
RCEM
ENT
5. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e ad
optio
n an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of p
olici
es, s
trat
egie
s, la
ws a
nd re
gula
tions
to p
reve
nt M
PA/N
-rela
ted
viol
atio
ns
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
E5-K
10. L
aws a
nd
regu
latio
ns re
late
d to
M
PA/N
s
Wha
t per
tinen
t nat
iona
l law
s, lo
cal
ordi
nanc
es a
nd o
ther
issu
ance
s rel
ated
to
MPA
/Ns t
hat y
ou k
now
of?
W
hat a
re th
e pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
ac
tiviti
es in
you
r MPA
/N?
E5-K
11. B
road
er
enfo
rcem
ent
plan
ning
Is th
ere
an e
nfor
cem
ent p
lan
for t
he
who
le m
unici
pal/
bay-
wid
e w
ater
s? If
ye
s, pl
ease
des
crib
e br
iefly
.
Is
the
enfo
rcem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N
inco
rpor
ated
in it
?
Page
| 7
E5-K
12. C
halle
nges
to
enfo
rcem
ent
Wha
t are
the
chal
leng
es a
nd b
arrie
rs
in e
nfor
cem
ent (
e.g.
socio
-cul
tura
l, po
litica
l, ec
onom
ic, e
tc.)?
Ho
w d
o yo
u ad
dres
s/re
solv
e th
em?
E5-K
13. I
nitia
tives
to
addr
ess M
PA/N
-re
late
d vi
olat
ions
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
activ
ities
co
nduc
ted
agai
nst M
PA/N
-rela
ted
viol
atio
ns in
you
r are
a?
E5
-K14
. Bes
t pr
actic
es in
im
prov
ing
law
en
forc
emen
t, co
mpl
ianc
e an
d se
curit
y in
and
ar
ound
the
MPA
/N
Wha
t are
you
r bes
t pra
ctice
s in
MPA
en
forc
emen
t and
pro
tect
ing
your
m
unici
pal w
ater
s?
Are
ther
e en
forc
emen
t pra
ctice
s in
othe
r are
as th
at y
ou h
ave
hear
d ab
out
and/
or re
plica
ted?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
E5-K
15. R
oles
, re
spon
sibili
ties a
nd
right
s of t
he v
ario
us
grou
ps (s
take
hold
ers,
law
enf
orce
men
t ag
encie
s and
the
judi
ciary
)
Wha
t are
the
man
date
s of a
genc
ies
(e.g
. BFA
R, D
ENR,
PNP
, Mar
itim
e,
Coas
tgua
rd, D
ILG,
etc
.) in
rela
tion
to
enfo
rcem
ent w
ithin
and
aro
und
the
MPA
/N?
Wha
t are
the
role
s, re
spon
sibili
ties a
nd
right
s of o
ther
stak
ehol
ders
? Ha
s an
agre
emen
t bee
n fo
rmed
with
th
ese
diffe
rent
gro
ups?
Cite
ex
ampl
e/s.
Page
| 8
E5-S
11. E
nfor
cem
ent
stra
tegi
es
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at e
nfor
cem
ent
activ
ities
are
bei
ng e
ffect
ivel
y do
ne?
(i.e.
, rel
ativ
e to
the
enfo
rcem
ent c
hain
–
dete
ctio
n, a
ppre
hens
ion,
filin
g of
ca
se, j
udge
men
t, et
c.).
E5
-S12
. Mak
es
corr
ect j
udge
men
t ca
lls
How
do
you
decid
e pr
oble
mat
ic ca
ses
rela
ted
to e
nfor
cem
ent?
Wha
t bas
is do
you
use
? De
scrib
e an
exa
mpl
e.
MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
6. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
an
effe
ctiv
e m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n (M
&E)
pro
gram
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Answ
er
M
6-K1
6. M
PA/
Netw
ork
obje
ctiv
es
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
M
PA/N
?
Wha
t ind
icato
r/s n
eed
to b
e m
onito
red
to d
eter
min
e if
thes
e ob
ject
ives
are
bei
ng m
et?
M6-
K17.
MPA
/N
Mon
itorin
g &
Ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
prog
ram
Wha
t is m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n an
d w
hy is
it im
port
ant?
Does
you
r MPA
/N h
ave
a M
&E
prog
ram
? If
yes,
wha
t was
you
r in
volv
emen
t in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M
&E
prog
ram
?
Page
| 9
M6-
K18.
Ada
ptiv
e m
anag
emen
t co
ncep
ts a
nd
impo
rtan
ce o
f fe
edba
ck
Adap
tive
man
agem
ent m
akes
use
of
resu
lts fr
om M
&E
to m
ake
adju
stm
ents
on
the
oper
atio
nal i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e M
PA/N
. Can
you
cite
an
inst
ance
w
here
ada
ptiv
e m
anag
emen
t was
pr
actic
ed in
you
r are
a (e
.g. o
n CR
M o
r M
PA p
rogr
ams)
?
Wha
t are
the
poss
ible
feed
back
ing
mec
hani
sms f
or th
e M
PA/N
and
how
re
gula
rly is
it d
one?
M
6-K1
9. R
oles
and
ex
pert
ise o
f diff
eren
t gr
oups
(e.g
. age
ncie
s, in
stitu
tes e
tc.)
Wha
t are
the
diffe
rent
ag
encie
s/gr
oups
who
par
ticip
ate
in th
e M
&E
and
wha
t exp
ertis
e/he
lp d
o th
ey
cont
ribut
e?
7. C
ompe
tenc
y: S
uppo
rt p
erfo
rman
ce-b
ased
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
M7-
K20.
Bes
t MPA
/N
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
on
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
s
Plea
se ci
te b
est p
ract
ices o
n pe
rform
ance
-bas
ed
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
rela
ted
to M
PA/N
man
agem
ent.
Are
you
adop
ting
thes
e pr
actic
es in
you
r are
a?
Wha
t are
the
crite
ria/b
ases
for t
he
perfo
rman
ce e
valu
atio
n?
M7-
S13.
Mak
es
corr
ect j
udge
men
t ca
lls
How
do
you
rew
ard/
puni
sh m
embe
rs
of th
e M
PA m
anag
emen
t bod
y? C
ite
inst
ance
s whe
n th
ese
wer
e gi
ven.
Page
| 1
0
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
W
ork
Attit
udes
No
t at
all
Som
e-tim
es
Mos
t of
the
time
All t
he
time
1.
I a
m a
criti
cal t
hink
er.
2.
I a
m o
pen
to su
gges
tions
and
cont
ribut
ions
of i
deas
from
oth
ers.
3.
I am
hon
est i
n al
l my
deal
ings
.
4.
I am
app
roac
habl
e an
d ap
prec
iate
inqu
iries
from
oth
ers.
5.
I am
will
ing
to le
arn
new
idea
s and
skill
s.
6.
I e
ncou
rage
the
part
icipa
tion,
coop
erat
ion
and
colla
bora
tion
of a
ll st
akeh
olde
rs in
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N.
7.
I a
m d
ilige
nt a
nd h
ardw
orki
ng to
acc
ompl
ish th
e ob
ject
ives
of o
ur M
PA/N
.
8.
I str
ive
to p
erfo
rm m
y du
ties a
nd re
spon
sibili
ties t
o th
e be
st o
f my
abili
ties a
nd w
ithou
t any
ves
ted
inte
rest
.
9.
I hav
e a
visio
n fo
r our
pro
tect
ed a
rea
and
have
idea
s and
pla
ns o
n ho
w to
hel
p ac
hiev
e it.
10. I
hel
p cr
eate
/rec
omm
end
law
s and
pol
icies
for t
he g
ood
of a
ll an
d no
t for
my
own
pers
onal
inte
rest
.
11. I
adh
ere
to th
e pr
incip
les o
f goo
d go
vern
ance
, i.e
. tra
nspa
renc
y, a
ccou
ntab
ility
and
par
ticip
ator
y, in
the
de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n.
12
. I su
ppor
t the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N M
anag
emen
t Pla
n.
13
. I a
llot a
nd p
rovi
de fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt to
the
MPA
/N.
14
. I a
m p
ublic
serv
ice-o
rient
ed a
nd d
edica
ted
in ra
ising
aw
aren
ess o
n M
PA/N
man
agem
ent a
nd p
rom
otin
g m
arin
e
cons
erva
tion.
15
. I st
rictly
enf
orce
and
/or f
ollo
w th
e la
w.
16
. I a
m fa
ir an
d ca
n m
ake
decis
ions
and
judg
men
ts w
ithou
t bia
s, ba
sed
on fa
cts a
nd a
ccor
ding
to th
e ru
le o
f law
.
17. I
mak
e de
cisio
ns a
nd a
ctio
ns b
ased
on
resu
lts a
nd re
com
men
datio
ns.
18
. I re
cogn
ize e
ffort
s and
giv
e cr
edit
to p
eopl
e.
19
. I a
m a
dapt
ive
and
capa
ble
of m
akin
g ap
prop
riate
chan
ges a
s nee
ded,
bas
ed o
n co
rrec
t inf
orm
atio
n.
38 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
SELF-ASSESSMENT FORMSPersonnel Category B
Page
| 1
PERS
ONNE
L CAT
EGOR
Y B
PLAN
NING
1.
Com
pete
ncy:
Dire
ct th
e de
velo
pmen
t, re
view
and
upd
atin
g of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Answ
er
P1
-K1.
Sta
te a
nd
impo
rtan
ce o
f coa
stal
an
d m
arin
e re
sour
ces
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces
in y
our a
rea?
Wha
t is t
he im
port
ance
of m
anag
ing
thes
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces?
P1
-K2.
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t was
you
r rol
e in
the
deve
lopm
ent p
roce
ss o
f you
r MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
W
hat a
re so
me
of th
e co
nten
ts o
f the
M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
W
hy is
it im
port
ant t
o ha
ve a
pla
n?
P1-K
3. A
sses
smen
t/
Iden
tifica
tion
of
risks
/thr
eats
to th
e M
PA/N
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s add
ress
ed
by y
our M
PA/N
?
Wha
t are
the
impa
cts o
f the
se th
reat
s?
Page
| 2
P1-K
4. In
corp
orat
ion
of m
anag
emen
t pla
n to
bro
ader
m
anag
emen
t pla
ns
Does
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n co
ntrib
ute
to th
e br
oade
r m
anag
emen
t pla
ns (e
.g. C
LWUP
, ICM
pl
an, P
DPFP
, etc
.) of
you
r m
unici
palit
y/pr
ovin
ce?
If ye
s, ho
w?
P1-S
1. E
ffect
ive
facil
itatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
facil
itate
the
deve
lopm
ent
and
upda
ting
of th
e M
PA/N
m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
2.
Com
pete
ncy:
Dire
ct th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
and
prog
ram
s
P2-K
5. Im
plem
entin
g th
e m
anag
emen
t pl
an
Wha
t are
the
MPA
/N a
ctio
n pl
ans t
hat
are
bein
g im
plem
ente
d?
Can
you
men
tion
som
e ac
tiviti
es in
the
plan
that
hav
e an
d ha
ve n
ot b
een
done
?
P2
-K6.
Man
agem
ent
stru
ctur
e an
d go
vern
ance
Wha
t are
the
role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s of
eac
h pe
rson
/ com
mitt
ee in
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t str
uctu
re?
Desc
ribe
som
e of
them
.
Wha
t are
the
skill
s, kn
owle
dge
and/
or
tale
nts r
equi
red
for p
eopl
e in
volv
ed in
M
PA/N
man
agem
ent?
Page
| 3
P2-S
2. C
apac
ity
need
s ass
essm
ents
Ho
w d
o yo
u as
sess
the
capa
citie
s of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t per
sonn
el?
Do y
ou co
nduc
t tra
inin
gs fo
r the
staf
f or
ens
ure
that
they
get
the
appr
opria
te tr
aini
ngs i
n or
der t
o im
prov
e th
eir c
apac
ities
? Na
me
trai
ning
s con
duct
ed.
P2-K
7. D
ecisi
on-
mak
ing
stru
ctur
es
and
proc
esse
s af
fect
ing
impl
emen
tatio
n
Desc
ribe
the
decis
ion-
mak
ing
proc
ess
for i
mpl
emen
ting
and
mon
itorin
g M
PA/N
act
ion
plan
s/pr
ojec
ts.
Is th
ere
a cle
ar a
nd o
pera
tiona
l m
echa
nism
for r
esol
ving
conf
licts
? If
yes,
desc
ribe
brie
fly.
P2-S
3. Le
ader
ship
an
d de
cisio
n-m
akin
g sk
ills
Can
you
cite
inst
ance
s whe
n yo
u ha
d to
mak
e de
cisio
ns a
bout
MPA
/N
impl
emen
tatio
n?
Wer
e yo
u ab
le to
mak
e yo
ur p
artn
ers
and
team
mem
bers
agr
ee w
ith y
our
decis
ion?
Ho
w d
o yo
u m
otiv
ate
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
othe
r st
akeh
olde
rs to
sust
ain
thei
r effo
rts f
or
the
MPA
/N?
Page
| 4
FINA
NCIN
G 3.
Com
pete
ncy:
Pre
pare
fina
nce-
rela
ted
plan
s for
the
MPA
/N
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Re
spon
se/R
emar
ks
F3
-K8.
The
ory,
bes
t pr
actic
es a
nd
stra
tegi
es fo
r de
velo
ping
su
stai
nabl
e fin
ancia
l an
d bu
sines
s pla
ns
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
sust
aina
ble
finan
cing
that
you
kn
ow o
f?
Wha
t fin
ance
- rel
ated
pla
n/s h
ave
you
prep
ared
(e.g
. ann
ual f
inan
cial p
lan,
bu
sines
s pla
n, su
stai
nabi
lity
plan
)?
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
cont
ents
of
thes
e pl
ans?
P3
-K9.
Fam
iliar
ity
with
bud
get c
ycle
an
d ob
ject
of
expe
nditu
res
Wha
t are
the
finan
cial n
eeds
of y
our
MPA
/N (e
.g. e
nfor
cem
ent t
o in
clude
lit
igat
ion
proc
ess,
M&
E, IE
C, p
hysic
al
stru
ctur
e, e
tc.)?
Are
thes
e ite
ms
inclu
ded
in th
e bu
dget
?
Are
ther
e fu
nds t
o su
fficie
ntly
supp
ort
thes
e ne
eds?
Exp
lain
you
r ans
wer
. De
scrib
e th
e ge
nera
l pro
cess
of
budg
etin
g, d
isbur
sing,
acc
ount
ing
and
audi
ting
MPA
/N re
late
d ex
pens
es.
Page
| 5
F3-K
10. E
ffect
ive
polic
ies a
nd
stra
tegi
es to
ens
ure
finan
cial a
nd lo
gist
ic su
ppor
t to
MPA
/Ns
Wha
t pol
icies
/str
ateg
ies s
houl
d be
in
plac
e to
ens
ure
that
fund
s are
pr
ovid
ed fo
r the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e M
PA/N
?
Are
thes
e be
ing
impl
emen
ted
in y
our
MPA
/N?
If ye
s, cit
e w
hich
one
s.
F3
-S4.
Pre
para
tion
of
finan
ce-re
late
d pl
ans
How
do
you
asse
ss/e
stim
ate
the
finan
cial n
eeds
of t
he M
PA/N
?
How
do
you
prep
are
the
plan
/s?
Desc
ribe
brie
fly.
4.
Com
pete
ncy:
Abl
e to
mob
ilize
sust
aina
ble
fund
ing a
nd re
sour
ces f
or th
e M
PA/N
F4-K
11. O
ptio
n fo
r so
urce
s of f
unds
and
re
sour
ces t
o su
ppor
t th
e M
PA/N
Wha
t are
the
poss
ible
sour
ces o
f fu
nds/
reso
urce
s to
supp
ort t
he
prog
ram
s and
act
iviti
es o
f the
MPA
/N?
Cite
age
ncie
s/ o
rgan
izatio
ns th
at ca
n po
tent
ially
pro
vide
ass
istan
ce (e
.g.
fund
s, te
chni
cal,
equi
pmen
t, et
c.) t
o th
e M
PA/N
, inc
ludi
ng e
nfor
cem
ent
and
M&
E.
Wha
t is t
he p
roce
ss fo
r acc
essin
g th
ese
fund
s and
reso
urce
s?
Page
| 6
Can
you
desc
ribe
the
polic
ies a
nd/o
r re
quire
men
ts o
f the
se a
ssist
ing
agen
cies/
orga
niza
tions
(e.g
. M
OA/M
OU,
etc
.)?
F4-S
5. P
repa
ratio
n of
pr
ojec
t pro
posa
ls Do
you
pre
pare
pro
ject
pro
posa
ls? If
ye
s, de
scrib
e br
iefly
.
Have
you
att
ende
d an
y tr
aini
ng re
late
d to
pro
posa
l writ
ing?
If y
es, n
ame
the
trai
ning
/s.
F4-S
6. A
lloca
te,
mob
ilize
and
ou
tsou
rce
fund
s and
re
sour
ces f
or M
PA/N
How
do
you
allo
cate
and
prio
ritize
fu
nds/
reso
urce
s for
the
MPA
/N?
How
do
you
help
gen
erat
e fu
nds/
reso
urce
s for
the
MPA
/N?
5.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
finan
cial m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
in p
lace
F5-K
12. S
tand
ards
, no
rms a
nd b
est
prac
tices
in fi
nanc
ial
man
agem
ent
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent t
hat y
ou
know
of?
Wha
t is t
he p
resc
ribed
fina
ncia
l re
port
ing
that
you
follo
w?
Page
| 7
F5-S
7. F
inan
cial
man
agem
ent s
kills
Ho
w d
o yo
u en
sure
that
fina
ncia
l m
anag
emen
t (e.
g. b
udge
ting,
ac
coun
ting,
pro
cure
men
t, et
c.) i
s tim
ely
and
bein
g fo
llow
ed p
rope
rly?
Cite
som
e in
stan
ces.
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at fu
nds a
re
spen
t wise
ly a
nd e
fficie
ntly
?
F5
-S8.
Fina
ncia
l re
port
ing
How
do
you
prep
are
your
fina
ncia
l re
port
?
How
do
you
pres
ent y
our f
inan
cial
repo
rts?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
6.
Com
pete
ncy:
Pro
mot
e aw
aren
ess,
unde
rsta
ndin
g and
supp
ort o
f and
for t
he M
PA/N
syst
em a
nd it
s val
ues
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
C6-K
13. M
PA/N
in
form
atio
n th
at
need
s to
be
com
mun
icate
d w
ithin
and
out
side
the
man
agem
ent
body
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant
conc
epts
/info
rmat
ion
abou
t MPA
/Ns
that
the
peop
le/c
omm
unity
shou
ld
know
abo
ut?
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut
the
MPA
/N in
you
r are
a?
C6-K
14.
Com
mun
icatio
n st
rate
gies
Wha
t are
you
r com
mun
icatio
n st
rate
gies
? Gi
ve e
xam
ples
.
Page
| 8
Is th
ere
a m
echa
nism
for t
he g
ener
al
publ
ic to
be
cons
isten
tly, e
ffect
ivel
y an
d pr
oact
ivel
y be
info
rmed
abo
ut
MPA
/N p
rogr
ams a
nd a
ctiv
ities
? If
yes,
cite
som
e ex
ampl
es.
C6-K
15. O
ptio
ns o
n pr
ovid
ing
reso
urce
s fo
r the
co
mm
unica
tions
pr
ogra
m
Wha
t are
the
sour
ces o
f fun
ds a
nd
othe
r res
ourc
es to
supp
ort t
he
com
mun
icatio
n pr
ogra
m fo
r the
M
PA/N
? Ci
te e
xam
ples
, sou
rces
, etc
.
C6
-S9.
Effe
ctiv
e co
mm
unica
tion
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u ha
rnes
s sup
port
for t
he
MPA
/N?
If th
ere
are
peop
le w
ho d
o no
t sup
port
th
e M
PA/N
, how
do
you
deal
and
co
mm
unica
te w
ith th
em?
Cite
ex
ampl
es.
C6-S
10. C
oord
inat
ion
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u en
gage
with
mem
bers
of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y? W
hy
did
you
enga
ge w
ith th
em (e
.g.
appr
oval
of t
he m
anag
emen
t pla
n,
team
bui
ldin
g, d
evel
opin
g th
e M
&E
plan
, enf
orce
men
t etc
.)?
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs
and
othe
r age
ncie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N?
Why
did
yo
u en
gage
with
them
(see
k fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t, de
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an,
prod
uctio
n of
IEC
mat
eria
ls, e
ncou
rage
pa
rtici
patio
n, jo
int e
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
)
Page
| 9
C6-S
11. P
eopl
e sk
ills
Desc
ribe
your
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
with
1) m
embe
rs o
f the
man
agem
ent
body
and
2) s
take
hold
ers.
How
do
you
hand
le d
isagr
eem
ents
be
twee
n m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
or
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y?
ENFO
RCEM
ENT
7. C
ompe
tenc
y: D
irect
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
enf
orce
men
t pla
n fo
r the
MPA
/N
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
E7-K
16. L
aws a
nd
regu
latio
ns re
late
d to
M
PA/N
s
Wha
t per
tinen
t nat
iona
l law
s, lo
cal
ordi
nanc
es a
nd o
ther
issu
ance
s rel
ated
to
MPA
/Ns t
hat y
ou k
now
of?
Wha
t are
the
proh
ibite
d an
d al
low
ed
activ
ities
in y
our M
PA/N
?
E7
-K17
. Key
conc
epts
an
d be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t
Desc
ribe
the
maj
or e
lem
ents
of t
he
enfo
rcem
ent c
hain
(i.e
. det
ectio
n,
appr
ehen
sion,
filin
g of
case
, jud
gmen
t, et
c.).
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t tha
t you
kno
w o
f th
at o
ther
s can
lear
n fro
m y
ou?
Plea
se
cite
exam
ples
.
Page
| 1
0
E7
-K18
. En
forc
emen
t pl
anni
ng
Wha
t was
you
r rol
e in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
enf
orce
men
t pla
n fo
r the
MPA
/N?
Desc
ribe
the
maj
or co
mpo
nent
s and
st
rate
gies
in th
e en
forc
emen
t pla
n.
E7-K
19. B
road
er
enfo
rcem
ent
plan
ning
Is th
ere
an e
nfor
cem
ent p
lan
for t
he
who
le m
unici
pal/
bay-
wid
e w
ater
s? If
ye
s, pl
ease
des
crib
e br
iefly
.
Is th
e en
forc
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
in
corp
orat
ed in
it?
E7-S
12. A
naly
tical
sk
ills
How
do
you
know
if th
e en
forc
emen
t st
rate
gies
em
ploy
ed a
re a
ppro
pria
te
and
effe
ctiv
e?
How
do
you
adap
t or a
djus
t?
8.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t pla
n
E8-K
20. I
mpo
rtan
ce
of e
nfor
cem
ent
activ
ities
Is th
ere
a ne
ed to
mon
itor
enfo
rcem
ent a
ctiv
ities
? Ex
plai
n yo
ur
answ
er.
Page
| 1
1
Wha
t are
the
tool
s/m
etho
ds th
at ca
n be
use
d to
mon
itor/
asse
ss
enfo
rcem
ent a
ctiv
ities
?
E8
-K21
. Cha
lleng
es to
en
forc
emen
t W
hat a
re th
e ch
alle
nges
and
bar
riers
in
enf
orce
men
t (e.
g. so
cio-c
ultu
ral,
polit
ical,
econ
omic,
etc
.)?
How
do
you
addr
ess/
reso
lve
them
?
E8
-S13
. Enf
orce
men
t st
rate
gies
Ho
w d
o yo
u en
sure
that
enf
orce
men
t ac
tiviti
es a
re e
ffect
ivel
y do
ne?
(i.e.
, re
lativ
e to
the
enfo
rcem
ent c
hain
–
dete
ctio
n, a
ppre
hens
ion,
filin
g of
case
, ju
dgem
ent,
etc.
).
E8
-S14
. Mak
es
corr
ect j
udge
men
t ca
lls
How
do
you
decid
e pr
oble
mat
ic ca
ses
rela
ted
to e
nfor
cem
ent?
Wha
t bas
is do
you
use
? De
scrib
e an
exa
mpl
e.
Page
| 1
2
MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
9. C
ompe
tenc
y: D
evel
op a
nd im
plem
ent a
n ef
fect
ive
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
(M&
E) p
rogr
am a
nd fe
edba
ck sy
stem
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Resp
onse
/Rem
arks
M9-
K22.
MPA
/ Ne
twor
k ob
ject
ives
an
d be
nefit
s
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
M
PA/N
?
Wha
t ind
icato
r/s n
eed
to b
e m
onito
red
to d
eter
min
e if
thes
e ob
ject
ives
are
bei
ng m
et?
M9-
K23.
MPA
/N
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
prog
ram
Wha
t is m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n an
d w
hy is
it im
port
ant?
Does
you
r MPA
/N h
ave
a M
&E
prog
ram
? If
yes,
wha
t was
you
r in
volv
emen
t in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M
&E
prog
ram
?
M
9-K2
4.
Com
pone
nts o
f the
M
&E
prog
ram
-
Perfo
rman
ce M
&E
syst
em
- Ec
olog
ical/
biop
hysic
al M
&E
syst
em
- So
cio-e
cono
mic
M&
E sy
stem
Wha
t are
the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of
your
M&
E pr
ogra
m –
doe
s it i
nclu
de a
co
mpo
nent
on
perfo
rman
ce o
f m
anag
emen
t bod
y, e
colo
gica
l co
mpo
nent
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
com
pone
nt?
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f eac
h co
mpo
nent
?
Page
| 1
3
M
9-K2
5. In
dica
tors
us
ed in
M&
E
- Pe
rform
ance
M&
E -
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M&
E -
Socio
-eco
nom
ic M
&E
Wha
t are
the
indi
cato
rs th
at y
ou
mon
itor f
or e
ach
of th
e m
ain
com
pone
nts o
f you
r M&
E pr
ogra
m?
In
the
tabl
e on
the
right
, che
ck th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify
how
ofte
n th
ey a
re m
onito
red
(ann
ual,
quar
terly
). Ac
rony
ms u
sed:
M
EAT
– M
PA M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s As
sess
men
t Too
l M
ETT
– M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s Tra
ckin
g To
ol
NEAT
– N
etw
ork
Effe
ctiv
enes
s Ass
essm
ent T
ool
CPUE
– C
atch
per
uni
t effo
rt
Chec
k th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify h
ow o
ften
they
are
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Indi
cato
rs
Chec
k if
mon
itore
d Sc
hedu
le o
f m
onito
ring
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A.
Leve
l & ra
ting
(MEA
T)
B. S
core
(MET
T)
C. Le
vel &
ratin
g (N
EAT)
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL
A. %
live
cora
l cov
er
B. F
ish b
iom
ass (
tons
/sq.
km)
C. %
seag
rass
cove
r or d
ensit
y
D.
Num
ber o
f spe
cies:
1.
Fish
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
E. %
man
grov
e ca
nopy
cove
r
F.
Tot
al a
rea
(hec
tare
s)
1. C
oral
reef
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
G. M
arin
e m
amm
al si
ghtin
gs &
mor
talit
ies (
spec
ies)
H.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A. H
ouse
hold
inco
me
B. F
ish ca
tch
(CPU
E)
C. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
Page
| 1
4
M
9-S1
5. E
ffect
ivel
y co
nduc
t M&
E su
rvey
s Do
you
cond
uct M
&E
surv
eys (
i.e.
perfo
rman
ce, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic,
ecol
ogica
l)?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
yo
ur sk
ills o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht.
SCAL
E:
0 –
None
1
– W
ith tr
aini
ng/ h
as a
ssist
ed a
few
tim
es
2 –
Can
perfo
rm w
ith m
inim
um
s
uper
visio
n 3
– Ca
n pe
rform
inde
pend
ently
4
– Ca
n su
perv
ise a
gro
up
Acro
nym
s use
d:
CPCE
– C
oral
poi
nt co
unt w
ith E
xcel
ext
ensio
ns
SEAT
– S
ocio
-eco
nom
ic As
sess
men
t Too
l So
cMon
– S
ocio
econ
omic
Mon
itorin
g
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox u
sing
the
indi
cate
d sc
ale
(see
left
colu
mn)
.
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
skill
s 0
1 2
3 4
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A. M
EAT
B.
MET
T
C. N
EAT
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL/ B
IOPH
YSIC
AL
A.
Cor
al re
ef a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
1. M
anta
tow
2
. Lin
e in
terc
ept t
rans
ect (
LIT)
3
. Pho
toqu
adra
t &CP
CE
4. F
ish v
isual
cens
us (F
VC)
5. R
eef C
heck
B. S
eagr
ass a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
C.
Sea
wee
d as
sess
men
t & m
onito
ring
D.
Bea
ch fo
rest
ass
essm
ent &
mon
itorin
g
E. In
vert
ebra
te a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
F.
Cet
acea
n id
entif
icatio
n/ su
rvey
G. M
arin
e tu
rtle
iden
tifica
tion/
surv
ey
H.
Sea
bird
surv
ey
I.
Othe
r (pl
s. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A.
SEA
T
B. S
ocM
on
C.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
Page
| 1
5
Have
you
rece
ived
any
trai
ning
s on
MPA
/N M
&E?
Nam
e tr
aini
ngs
rece
ived
.
M9-
S16.
Pla
nnin
g an
d or
gani
zing
skill
s Ho
w d
id y
ou fa
cilita
te th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e M
PA/N
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
How
do
you
plan
for a
ctua
l M&
E ac
tiviti
es?
10
. Com
pete
ncy:
For
mul
ate
adap
tive
man
agem
ent s
trat
egie
s bas
ed o
n m
onito
ring a
nd e
valu
atio
n re
sults
.
M10
-K26
. Ada
ptiv
e m
anag
emen
t co
ncep
ts a
nd
impo
rtan
ce o
f fe
edba
ck
Adap
tive
man
agem
ent i
nvol
ves t
he u
se
of re
sults
from
M&
E to
mak
e ad
just
men
ts to
the
oper
atio
nal
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N. C
an
you
cite
an in
stan
ce w
here
ada
ptiv
e m
anag
emen
t was
pra
ctice
d in
you
r ar
ea (e
.g. o
n CR
M o
r MPA
pro
gram
s)?
Wha
t are
the
poss
ible
feed
back
ing
mec
hani
sms f
or th
e M
PA/N
and
how
re
gula
rly is
it d
one?
Page
| 1
6
M
10-K
27.
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
repo
rts
Wha
t sho
uld
be p
rese
nted
and
in
clude
d in
the
M&
E re
port
s?
M
10-S
17. A
naly
tical
sk
ills t
o fo
rmul
ate
appr
opria
te
inte
rven
tions
Can
you
cite
exam
ples
of
inte
rven
tions
/ im
prov
ed st
rate
gies
th
at y
ou im
plem
ente
d af
ter s
eein
g th
e re
sults
of t
he M
&E?
Why
wer
e th
ese
done
?
M
10-S
18. T
echn
ical
writ
ing,
effe
ctiv
e fe
edba
ck a
nd
pres
enta
tion
skill
s of
M&
E re
sults
How
do
you
give
feed
back
abo
ut th
e M
&E
resu
lts (e
.g. s
ubm
issio
n of
re
port
s, pu
blic
pres
enta
tions
, etc
.)?
Ho
w w
ould
you
rate
you
rsel
f in
term
s of
tech
nica
l writ
ing
and
pres
enta
tion
skill
s to
effe
ctiv
ely
feed
back
M&
E re
sults
? Ra
te y
our s
kills
on
a sc
ale
of 0
-4.
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox. S
cale
: 0 b
eing
NON
E, 1
-POO
R, 2
-MOD
ERAT
E, 3
-GOO
D, 4
-EXC
ELLE
NT
SKILL
S 0
1 2
3 4
1. T
echn
ical w
ritin
g
2. F
eedb
acki
ng
3.
Pre
sent
atio
n sk
ills
Page
| 1
7
11. C
ompe
tenc
y: L
inki
ng M
&E
resu
lts w
ith p
erfo
rman
ce-b
ased
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
s for
MPA
/N im
plem
enta
tion
M
11-K
28.
Perfo
rman
ce-b
ased
in
cent
ive/
di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
s
Plea
se ci
te b
est p
ract
ices o
n pe
rform
ance
-bas
ed
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
rela
ted
to M
PA/N
man
agem
ent.
Are
you
adop
ting
thes
e pr
actic
es in
you
r are
a?
W
hat a
re th
e cr
iteria
/bas
es fo
r the
pe
rform
ance
eva
luat
ion?
W
hat w
as y
our p
artic
ipat
ion
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
his s
yste
m?
M
11-S
19. M
akes
co
rrec
t jud
gem
ent
calls
How
do
you
rew
ard/
puni
sh m
embe
rs
of th
e M
PA m
anag
emen
t bod
y? C
ite
inst
ance
s whe
n th
ese
wer
e gi
ven.
Page
| 1
8
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
Wor
k At
titud
es
Not a
t al
l So
me-
times
Mos
t of
the
time
All
the
time
1.
I ini
tiate
eve
nts a
nd p
rovi
de g
uida
nce
and
lead
ersh
ip to
my
team
.
2.
I a
m h
ones
t in
all m
y de
alin
gs.
3.
I am
app
roac
habl
e an
d ea
sy to
talk
with
.
4.
I a
m w
illin
g to
lear
n ne
w id
eas a
nd sk
ills.
5.
I f
acili
tate
par
ticip
atio
n an
d co
oper
atio
n am
ong
stak
ehol
ders
in th
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
.
6.
I a
m d
ilige
nt a
nd h
ardw
orki
ng to
acc
ompl
ish th
e ob
ject
ives
of o
ur M
PA/N
7.
I s
triv
e to
per
form
my
dutie
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s to
the
best
of m
y ab
ilitie
s and
with
out a
ny v
este
d in
tere
st.
8.
I am
ope
n to
the
cont
ribut
ion
of id
eas f
rom
oth
ers i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he m
anag
emen
t pla
n.
9.
I can
pla
n st
rate
gica
lly to
war
ds th
e ac
hiev
emen
t of a
goa
l.
10
. I a
dher
e to
the
prin
ciple
s of g
ood
gove
rnan
ce, i
.e. t
rans
pare
ncy,
acc
ount
abili
ty a
nd p
artic
ipat
ory,
etc
. in
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
man
agem
ent p
lan.
11. I
am
reso
urce
ful a
nd ca
n he
lp ra
ise, m
obili
ze a
nd se
cure
fund
s for
the
MPA
/N
12. I
adh
ere
to th
e st
anda
rds o
f tra
nspa
renc
y an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
in a
ll fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
.
13
. I a
m m
eticu
lous
and
I al
way
s see
to it
that
the
fund
s are
spen
t wise
ly a
nd fr
ugal
ly, a
nd li
quid
ated
pro
perly
and
on
time.
14
. I a
m fa
ir in
allo
catin
g fu
nds.
15. I
cond
uct m
y fin
ancia
l and
adm
inist
rativ
e du
ties i
n a
syst
emat
ic an
d ef
ficie
nt m
anne
r.
16
. I ca
n de
term
ine
appr
opria
te m
essa
ges,
com
mun
icatio
n te
chni
ques
and
IEC
mat
eria
ls ne
eded
for v
ario
us a
udie
nces
.
17
. I h
elp
deve
lop
and
impl
emen
t law
s and
pol
icies
for t
he g
ood
of a
ll an
d no
t for
my
own
pers
onal
inte
rest
.
18
. I a
m p
ublic
serv
ice-o
rient
ed a
nd su
ppor
tive
of im
plem
entin
g en
forc
emen
t act
iviti
es a
ccor
ding
to th
e ru
le o
f law
.
19
. In
enfo
rcin
g th
e la
w, I
exe
rcise
sens
itivi
ty to
oth
er cu
lture
s, ge
nder
and
the
indi
geno
us p
eopl
e’s r
ight
s.
20. I
am
fair
and
hone
st in
enf
orcin
g th
e la
w.
21. I
wel
com
e in
ter-a
genc
y co
llabo
ratio
n w
ith o
ther
enf
orce
men
t gro
ups a
nd sh
arin
g of
idea
s and
reso
urce
s to
help
add
ress
issu
es
in o
ur w
ater
s.
22. I
pro
mot
e st
rict c
ompl
ianc
e to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
act
ion
plan
s (e.
g. M
&E
Plan
, Fin
ancia
l Pla
n, E
nfor
cem
ent P
lan,
etc
.)
Page
| 1
9
Wor
k At
titud
es
Not a
t al
l So
me
of th
e tim
e
Mos
t of
the
time
All
the
time
23. I
can
mak
e de
cisio
ns b
ased
on
fact
s and
val
id in
form
atio
n.
24. I
reco
gnize
effo
rts,
give
cred
it to
peo
ple
and
prov
ide
oppo
rtun
ities
for a
dvan
cem
ent a
nd p
rom
otio
n to
per
sonn
el a
nd st
aff.
25. I
hav
e fo
resig
ht, i
nitia
tive
and
have
a p
lan
for t
he fu
ture
.
26
. I a
m a
dapt
ive
and
capa
ble
of m
akin
g ap
prop
riate
chan
ges a
s nee
ded,
bas
ed o
n co
rrec
t inf
orm
atio
n.
58 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
SELF-ASSESSMENT FORMSPersonnel Category C
Page
| 1
PERS
ONNE
L CAT
EGOR
Y C
PLAN
NING
1.
Com
pete
ncy:
Con
trib
ute
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t, re
view
and
upd
atin
g of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Answ
er
P1
-K1.
Stat
e an
d im
port
ance
of c
oast
al
and
mar
ine
reso
urce
s
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces
in y
our a
rea?
Wha
t is t
he im
port
ance
of m
anag
ing
thes
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces?
P1
-K2.
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t was
you
r rol
e in
the
deve
lopm
ent p
roce
ss o
f you
r MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
cont
ents
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
P1-K
3. A
sses
smen
t/
Iden
tifica
tion
of
risks
/thr
eats
to th
e M
PA/N
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s add
ress
ed
by y
our M
PA/N
?
Wha
t are
the
impa
cts o
f the
se th
reat
s?
Page
| 2
2.
Com
pete
ncy:
Con
trib
ute
to th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
mon
itorin
g of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
P2
-K4.
Impl
emen
ting
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t are
the
MPA
/N a
ctio
n pl
ans t
hat
are
bein
g im
plem
ente
d?
Ca
n yo
u m
entio
n so
me
activ
ities
in th
e pl
an th
at h
ave
and
have
not
bee
n do
ne?
P2-S
1. C
apac
ity
need
s ass
essm
ents
Ho
w d
o yo
u as
sess
the
capa
city
need
s of
the
MPA
/N te
chni
cal t
eam
?
Ha
ve th
ese
capa
city
need
s bee
n ad
dres
sed?
Nam
e tr
aini
ngs c
ondu
cted
.
P2
-S2.
Ade
pt in
m
onito
ring
and
impl
emen
tatio
n pr
oced
ures
How
do
you
cont
ribut
e to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
pro
gram
s and
st
rate
gies
indi
cate
d in
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Page
| 3
FINA
NCIN
G 3.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ass
ist in
pre
parin
g fin
ancin
g-re
late
d pl
ans
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
F3-K
5. T
heor
y, b
est
prac
tices
and
st
rate
gies
for
deve
lopi
ng
sust
aina
ble
finan
cial
and
busin
ess p
lans
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
sust
aina
ble
finan
cing
that
you
kn
ow o
f?
Wha
t fin
ance
-rela
ted
plan
/s (e
.g.
annu
al fi
nanc
ial p
lan,
bus
ines
s pla
n,
sust
aina
bilit
y pl
an) h
ave
you
help
ed
prep
are?
Why
is it
impo
rtan
t to
have
th
em?
F3-K
6. F
amili
arity
w
ith b
udge
t cyc
le
and
obje
ct o
f ex
pend
iture
s
Wha
t are
the
finan
cial n
eeds
of y
our
MPA
/N?
Are
thes
e ite
ms i
nclu
ded
in
the
budg
et?
Desc
ribe
the
gene
ral p
roce
ss o
f bu
dget
ing,
disb
ursin
g, a
ccou
ntin
g an
d au
ditin
g M
PA/N
rela
ted
expe
nses
.
F3
-K7.
Effe
ctiv
e po
licie
s and
st
rate
gies
to e
nsur
e fin
ancia
l and
logi
stic
supp
ort t
o M
PA/N
s
Wha
t pol
icies
/str
ateg
ies s
houl
d be
in
plac
e to
ens
ure
that
fund
s are
pr
ovid
ed fo
r the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e M
PA/N
?
Are
thes
e be
ing
impl
emen
ted
in y
our
MPA
/N?
If ye
s, cit
e w
hich
one
s.
Page
| 4
F3-S
3. P
repa
ratio
n of
fin
ance
-rela
ted
plan
s W
hat i
s you
r rol
e in
the
prep
arat
ion
of
finan
ce-re
late
d pl
ans?
How
do
you
asse
ss/e
stim
ate
the
finan
cial n
eeds
of t
he M
PA/N
?
4.
Com
pete
ncy:
Adh
eres
to th
e fin
ancia
l man
agem
ent s
yste
m in
pla
ce
F4
-K8.
Sta
ndar
ds,
norm
s and
bes
t pr
actic
es in
fina
ncia
l m
anag
emen
t
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent t
hat y
ou
know
of?
Wha
t is t
he p
resc
ribed
fina
ncia
l re
port
ing
that
you
follo
w?
F4-S
4. F
inan
cial
man
agem
ent a
nd
docu
men
tatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at fi
nanc
ial
man
agem
ent (
e.g.
bud
getin
g,
acco
untin
g, p
rocu
rem
ent o
f goo
ds a
nd
serv
ices,
etc.
) is t
imel
y an
d be
ing
follo
wed
pro
perly
? Ci
te so
me
inst
ance
s.
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at fu
nds a
re
spen
t wise
ly a
nd e
fficie
ntly
?
F4
-S5.
Fin
ancia
l re
port
ing
How
do
you
prep
are
your
fina
ncia
l re
port
?
How
do
you
pres
ent y
our f
inan
cial
repo
rts?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Page
| 5
5.
Com
pete
ncy:
Man
age
and
mai
ntai
n as
sets
and
equ
ipm
ent
F5
-K9.
Fam
iliar
ity
with
ass
ets,
mat
eria
ls an
d eq
uipm
ent
Wha
t are
the
asse
ts, e
quip
men
t and
m
ater
ials
that
you
hav
e fo
r the
MPA
/N
and
thei
r use
s?
Do y
ou th
ink
thes
e ar
e su
fficie
nt fo
r th
e ef
fect
ive
man
agem
ent o
f the
M
PA/N
?
F5
-K10
. Pro
per
mai
nten
ance
, in
vent
ory
and
audi
ting
proc
edur
es
Wha
t are
the
appr
oved
pro
cedu
res f
or
the
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f eq
uipm
ent a
nd a
sset
s for
the
MPA
/N?
F5
-S6.
Inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce sk
ills
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at a
ll eq
uipm
ent a
nd m
ater
ials
for t
he
MPA
/N a
re a
ccou
nted
for a
nd a
re
wor
king
pro
perly
? De
scrib
e br
iefly
.
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
in
vent
ory
or m
aint
enan
ce o
f eq
uipm
ent?
List
trai
ning
s rec
eive
d.
Page
| 6
COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
6.
Com
pete
ncy:
Pro
mot
e aw
aren
ess,
unde
rsta
ndin
g and
supp
ort o
f and
for t
he M
PA/N
syst
em a
nd it
s val
ues
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
C6-K
11. M
PA/N
in
form
atio
n th
at
need
s to
be
com
mun
icate
d w
ithin
and
out
side
the
man
agem
ent
body
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant
conc
epts
/info
rmat
ion
abou
t MPA
/Ns
that
the
peop
le/c
omm
unity
shou
ld
know
abo
ut?
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut
the
MPA
/N in
you
r are
a?
C6-K
12.
Com
mun
icatio
n st
rate
gies
Wha
t are
you
r com
mun
icatio
n st
rate
gies
? Gi
ve e
xam
ples
.
Is th
ere
a m
echa
nism
for t
he g
ener
al
publ
ic to
be
cons
isten
tly, e
ffect
ivel
y an
d pr
oact
ivel
y in
form
ed a
bout
M
PA/N
pro
gram
s and
act
iviti
es?
If ye
s, cit
e so
me
exam
ples
.
C6
-S7.
Mes
sage
and
m
ater
ials
deve
lopm
ent
How
do
you
deve
lop
mes
sage
s for
yo
ur M
PA/N
’s IE
C m
ater
ials
(e.g
. tr
ansla
tion,
cont
ent)?
How
do
you
deve
lop,
des
ign
and
prod
uce
the
mat
eria
ls to
be
used
in co
mm
unica
tion
activ
ities
for t
he M
PA/N
?
Page
| 7
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ng/s
rela
ted
to IE
C m
essa
ge d
evel
opm
ent?
If y
es,
nam
e th
e tr
aini
ngs.
C6-S
8. E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
com
mun
icate
with
the
mem
bers
of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent
body
so th
at y
our i
deas
for t
he M
PA/N
pl
an (d
evel
opm
ent,
upda
ting)
and
its
impl
emen
tatio
n w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
/inclu
ded?
How
do
you
com
mun
icate
with
the
stak
ehol
ders
to p
rom
ote
thei
r aw
aren
ess a
nd su
ppor
t tow
ards
the
MPA
/N?
C6
-S9.
Coo
rdin
atio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith m
embe
rs o
f th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent b
ody?
Why
di
d yo
u en
gage
with
them
(e.g
. ap
prov
al o
f the
man
agem
ent p
lan,
te
am b
uild
ing,
dev
elop
ing
the
M&
E pl
an, e
nfor
cem
ent e
tc.)?
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs
and
othe
r age
ncie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N?
Why
did
yo
u en
gage
with
them
(see
k fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t, de
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an,
prod
uctio
n of
IEC
mat
eria
ls, e
ncou
rage
pa
rtici
patio
n, jo
int e
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
)?
Page
| 8
C6-S
10. P
eopl
e sk
ills
Desc
ribe
your
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
with
, (1)
mem
bers
of t
he m
anag
emen
t bo
dy a
nd (2
) sta
keho
lder
s.
How
do
you
hand
le d
isagr
eem
ents
be
twee
n m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
or
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y?
ENFO
RCEM
ENT
7. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e pr
even
tion
and
dete
ctio
n of
ille
gal a
ctiv
ities
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Answ
er
E7
-K13
. Law
s rel
ated
to
MPA
/Ns
Wha
t per
tinen
t nat
iona
l law
s, lo
cal
ordi
nanc
es a
nd o
ther
issu
ance
s rel
ated
to
MPA
/Ns t
hat y
ou k
now
of?
Wha
t are
the
proh
ibite
d an
d al
low
ed
activ
ities
in y
our M
PA/N
?
E7
-K14
. Enf
orce
men
t pl
anni
ng
Wha
t was
you
r rol
e in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
enf
orce
men
t pla
n fo
r the
MPA
/N?
Page
| 9
Desc
ribe
the
maj
or co
mpo
nent
s and
st
rate
gies
in th
e en
forc
emen
t pla
n.
E7-K
15. C
halle
nges
to
enfo
rcem
ent
Wha
t are
the
chal
leng
es a
nd b
arrie
rs
in e
nfor
cem
ent (
e.g.
socio
-cul
tura
l, po
litica
l, ec
onom
ic, e
tc.)?
Ho
w d
o yo
u ad
dres
s/re
solv
e th
em?
E7-S
11. A
naly
tical
sk
ills
How
do
you
know
if th
e en
forc
emen
t st
rate
gies
em
ploy
ed a
re a
ppro
pria
te
and
effe
ctiv
e?
How
do
you
adap
t or a
djus
t?
E7-S
12. E
nfor
cem
ent
skill
s rel
ated
to
prev
entio
n an
d de
tect
ion
How
do
you
prev
ent a
nd d
etec
t ille
gal
activ
ities
? Ci
te e
xam
ples
.
Page
| 1
0
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
th
e pr
even
tion
and
dete
ctio
n of
ille
gal
activ
ities
? Na
me
the
trai
ning
s.
8. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e ef
fect
ive
and
prop
er a
ppre
hens
ion
of su
spec
ts a
nd vi
olat
ors
E8
-K16
. Det
aile
d kn
owle
dge
on
pena
lties
and
fine
s ac
cord
ing
to la
ws a
nd
ordi
nanc
es
Wha
t are
the
fines
and
pen
altie
s of
proh
ibite
d ac
tiviti
es in
you
r MPA
/N a
s in
dica
ted
in e
xistin
g la
ws a
nd
ordi
nanc
es?
E8
-K17
. Pro
per
appr
ehen
sion
proc
edur
es
Desc
ribe
the
gene
ral a
ppre
hens
ion
proc
edur
es fo
r vio
lato
rs in
you
r M
PA/N
. Is t
his c
lear
ly st
ated
in th
e en
forc
emen
t pla
n?
Wha
t is y
our r
ole
in th
e ap
preh
ensio
n st
age
of M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t?
E8-S
13. E
nfor
cem
ent
skill
s rel
ated
to
appr
ehen
sion
Wha
t are
the
step
s tha
t you
follo
w
whe
n yo
u ap
preh
end
som
eone
?
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
th
e ap
preh
ensio
n of
susp
ecte
d vi
olat
ors?
Nam
e th
e tr
aini
ngs.
Page
| 1
1
9. C
ompe
tenc
y: D
ocum
enta
tion
and
feed
back
of e
nfor
cem
ent a
ctiv
ities
E9-K
18. B
asic
docu
men
tatio
n fo
r en
forc
emen
t pr
oced
ures
Wha
t is t
he p
roce
ss o
f doc
umen
tatio
n of
enf
orce
men
t act
iviti
es?
W
hat a
re th
e do
cum
enta
tion
requ
irem
ents
nee
ded
in
appr
ehen
sion?
E9
-K19
. Det
ails
of
lega
l pro
cess
es
Desc
ribe
the
proc
ess f
or fi
ling
case
s ag
ains
t app
rehe
nded
vio
lato
rs, i
.e.
filin
g th
e po
lice
repo
rt o
r blo
tter
; Co
urt p
roce
dure
s?
MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
10. C
ompe
tenc
y: C
ondu
ct o
f mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
M10
-K20
. M
PA/
Netw
ork
obje
ctiv
es
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
M
PA/N
?
Wha
t ind
icato
r/s n
eed
to b
e m
onito
red
to d
eter
min
e if
thes
e ob
ject
ives
are
bei
ng m
et?
Page
| 1
2
M
10-K
21. M
PA/N
M
onito
ring
and
Eval
uatio
n (M
&E)
pr
ogra
m
Wha
t is m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n an
d w
hy is
it im
port
ant?
Does
you
r MPA
/N h
ave
a M
&E
prog
ram
? If
yes,
wha
t was
you
r in
volv
emen
t in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M
&E
prog
ram
?
M
10-K
22.
Com
pone
nts o
f the
M
&E
prog
ram
-
Perfo
rman
ce
M&
E sy
stem
-
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M&
E sy
stem
-
Socio
-eco
nom
ic M
&E
syst
em
Wha
t are
the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of
your
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f eac
h co
mpo
nent
?
Page
| 1
3
M
10-K
23. I
ndica
tors
us
ed in
M&
E
- Pe
rform
ance
M
&E
- Ec
olog
ical/
biop
hysic
al M
&E
- So
cio-e
cono
mic
M&
E
Wha
t are
the
indi
cato
rs th
at y
ou
mon
itor f
or e
ach
of th
e m
ain
com
pone
nts o
f you
r M&
E pr
ogra
m?
In
the
tabl
e on
the
right
, che
ck th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify
how
ofte
n th
ey a
re m
onito
red
(ann
ual,
quar
terly
). Ac
rony
ms u
sed:
M
EAT
– M
PA M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s As
sess
men
t Too
l M
ETT
– M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s Tra
ckin
g To
ol
NEAT
– N
etw
ork
Effe
ctiv
enes
s Ass
essm
ent T
ool
CPUE
– C
atch
per
uni
t effo
rt
Chec
k th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify h
ow o
ften
they
are
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Indi
cato
rs
Chec
k if
mon
itore
d Sc
hedu
le o
f m
onito
ring
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A.
Leve
l & ra
ting
(MEA
T)
B. S
core
(MET
T)
C. Le
vel &
ratin
g (N
EAT)
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL
A. %
live
cora
l cov
er
B. F
ish b
iom
ass (
tons
/sqk
m)
C. %
seag
rass
cove
r or d
ensit
y
D.
Num
ber o
f spe
cies:
1.
Fish
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
E. %
man
grov
e ca
nopy
cove
r
F.
Tot
al a
rea
(hec
tare
s)
1. C
oral
reef
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
G. M
arin
e m
amm
al si
ghtin
gs &
mor
talit
ies (
spec
ies)
H.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A. H
ouse
hold
inco
me
B. F
ish ca
tch
(CPU
E or
kg/
trip
)
C.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
Page
| 1
4
M
10-S
14. E
ffect
ivel
y co
nduc
t M&
E su
rvey
s Do
you
cond
uct M
&E
surv
eys (
i.e.
perfo
rman
ce, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic,
ecol
ogica
l)?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
yo
ur sk
ills o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht. U
se sc
ale
belo
w.
SCAL
E:
0 –
None
1
– W
ith tr
aini
ng/ h
as a
ssist
ed a
few
tim
es
2 –
Can
perfo
rm w
ith m
inim
um
s
uper
visio
n 3
– Ca
n pe
rform
inde
pend
ently
4
– Ca
n su
perv
ise a
gro
up
Acro
nym
s use
d:
CPCE
– C
oral
poi
nt co
unt w
ith E
xcel
ext
ensio
ns
SEAT
– S
ocio
-eco
nom
ic As
sess
men
t Too
l So
cMon
– S
ocio
econ
omic
Mon
itorin
g
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox u
sing
the
indi
cate
d sc
ale
(see
left
colu
mn)
.
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
skill
s 0
1 2
3 4
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A. M
EAT
B.
MET
T
C. N
EAT
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL/ B
IOPH
YSIC
AL
A.
Cor
al re
ef a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
1. M
anta
tow
2
. Lin
e in
terc
ept t
rans
ect (
LIT)
3
. Pho
toqu
adra
t & C
PCE
4. F
ish v
isual
cens
us (F
VC)
5. R
eef C
heck
B. S
eagr
ass a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
C.
Sea
wee
d as
sess
men
t & m
onito
ring
D.
Bea
ch fo
rest
ass
essm
ent &
mon
itorin
g
E. In
vert
ebra
te a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
F.
Cet
acea
n id
entif
icatio
n/ su
rvey
G. M
arin
e tu
rtle
iden
tifica
tion/
surv
ey
H.
Sea
bird
surv
ey
I.
Othe
r (pl
s. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A.
SEA
T
B. S
ocM
on
C.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
Page
| 1
5
Have
you
rece
ived
any
trai
ning
s on
MPA
/N M
&E?
List
trai
ning
s rec
eive
d.
11. C
ompe
tenc
y: P
repa
ratio
n of
repo
rts b
ased
on
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
resu
lts a
nd fe
edba
ck a
ctiv
ities
M11
-K24
. Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
resu
lts
Why
is it
impo
rtan
t to
repo
rt M
&E
resu
lts?
Wha
t sho
uld
be p
rese
nted
and
in
clude
d in
the
M&
E re
port
s?
Page
| 1
6
M
11-S
15. D
ata
cons
olid
atio
n,
anal
ysis
and
inte
rpre
tatio
n (in
cludi
ng co
nfid
ence
le
vel),
tech
nica
l w
ritin
g, e
ffect
ive
feed
back
and
pr
esen
tatio
n sk
ills o
f M
&E
resu
lts
How
do
you
cons
olid
ate
and
anal
yse
data
?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
yo
ur sk
ills o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht.
How
wou
ld y
ou ra
te y
our l
evel
of
conf
iden
ce in
dat
a an
alys
is an
d in
terp
reta
tion
(enc
ircle
you
r ans
wer
on
the
right
)?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
.
SCAL
E: 0
– N
one,
1 –
With
trai
ning
/ has
ass
isted
a fe
w ti
mes
, 2 –
Can
per
form
with
min
imum
supe
rvisi
on, 3
– C
an p
erfo
rm
inde
pend
ently
, 4 –
Can
supe
rvise
/ tea
ch o
ther
s
Le
vel o
f con
fiden
ce in
dat
a an
alys
is &
inte
rpre
tatio
n (e
ncirc
le y
our a
nsw
er):
NO
NE
LO
W
FA
IRLY
CON
FIDE
NT
VERY
CON
FIDE
NT
SKILL
S 0
1 2
3 4
1. B
asic
Exce
l
2. S
PSS
3.
R S
tudi
o
4. Li
st o
ther
tool
s you
kno
w a
nd u
se:
5. T
echn
ical w
ritin
g
6. F
eedb
acki
ng
7.
Pre
sent
atio
n sk
ills
Have
you
rece
ived
any
trai
ning
s on
data
cons
olid
atio
n an
d an
alys
is? If
yes
, lis
t tra
inin
gs re
ceiv
ed.
How
do
you
give
feed
back
abo
ut th
e M
&E
resu
lts (e
.g. s
ubm
issio
n of
re
port
s, pu
blic
pres
enta
tions
, etc
.)?
Page
| 1
7
M
11-S
16. A
naly
tical
sk
ills t
o fo
rmul
ate
appr
opria
te
inte
rven
tions
Can
you
cite
exam
ples
of
inte
rven
tions
/ im
prov
ed st
rate
gies
th
at y
ou im
plem
ente
d af
ter s
eein
g th
e re
sults
of t
he M
&E?
Why
wer
e th
ese
done
?
12. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
ffect
ivel
y m
anag
e da
ta fo
r eas
y an
d tim
ely
acce
ss
M
12-K
25.
mec
hani
sm/ s
yste
m
of d
ata
man
agem
ent
Desc
ribe
your
dat
a m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
/mec
hani
sm.
Wha
t are
the
reso
urce
s nee
ded
to
have
a g
ood
data
man
agem
ent
syst
em?
M12
-S17
. Or
gani
zatio
n an
d st
orag
e
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at d
ata/
do
cum
ents
are
wel
l-kep
t and
pro
perly
co
mpi
led?
Giv
e ex
ampl
es o
f dat
a an
d re
port
s tha
t you
hav
e pr
epar
ed –
ac
tual
obs
erva
tion
of d
ocum
ents
, re
port
s, co
mpu
ter d
atab
ase,
etc
.
Can
data
and
repo
rts b
e ea
sily
acce
ssed
(i.e
. can
dat
a an
d re
port
s fro
m 2
010
and
2015
still
be
retr
ieve
d)?
Page
| 1
8
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (SC
ORE)
No
t at
all
Som
e-tim
es
Mos
t of
the
time
All t
he
time
1.
I am
hon
est i
n al
l my
deal
ings
.
2.
I am
app
roac
habl
e an
d ea
sy to
talk
with
.
3.
I am
will
ing
to le
arn
new
idea
s and
skill
s.
4.
I enc
oura
ge th
e pa
rtici
patio
n an
d co
oper
atio
n of
all
stak
ehol
ders
in th
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
.
5.
I am
dili
gent
and
har
dwor
king
to a
ccom
plish
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f our
MPA
/N.
6.
I s
triv
e to
per
form
my
dutie
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s to
the
best
of m
y ab
ilitie
s and
with
out a
ny v
este
d in
tere
st.
7.
I am
gui
ded
by th
e pr
incip
les o
f goo
d go
vern
ance
, i.e
. tra
nspa
renc
y, a
ccou
ntab
ility
and
par
ticip
ator
y, e
tc. i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
MPA
man
agem
ent p
lan.
8.
I f
ind
way
s to
help
raise
fund
s for
the
MPA
/N.
9.
I a
m m
eticu
lous
and
alw
ays p
ay a
tten
tion
to fi
nanc
ial d
etai
ls (e
.g. b
udge
t, fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
, etc
.).
10
. I ca
n di
spen
se m
y fin
ancia
l and
adm
inist
rativ
e du
ties i
n a
syst
emat
ic an
d ef
ficie
nt m
anne
r.
11. I
adh
ere
to th
e st
anda
rds o
f tra
nspa
renc
y an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
in a
ll fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
.
12. I
alw
ays s
ee to
it th
at fu
nds a
nd re
sour
ces a
re sp
ent w
isely
and
not
in a
n ex
trav
agan
t way
.
13
. I a
m cr
eativ
e an
d re
sour
cefu
l in
dete
rmin
ing
appr
opria
te IE
C m
edia
and
mat
eria
l.
14. I
can
dete
rmin
e ap
prop
riate
mes
sage
s and
com
mun
icatio
n m
ater
ials
for d
iffer
ent a
udie
nces
.
15. I
am
fair
and
hone
st in
enf
orcin
g th
e la
w.
16
. I a
m co
urag
eous
and
min
dful
of t
he la
w w
hen
cond
uctin
g en
forc
emen
t act
iviti
es.
17
. I a
m a
lway
s res
pect
ful o
f peo
ple
and
thei
r rig
hts,
in th
e pe
rform
ance
of m
y du
ties o
n en
forc
emen
t.
18. I
am
a te
am p
laye
r and
can
wor
k in
colla
bora
tion
with
oth
ers.
19. I
am
ada
ptiv
e an
d ca
pabl
e of
mak
ing
appr
opria
te ch
ange
s as n
eede
d, b
ased
on
corr
ect i
nfor
mat
ion.
20. I
can
mak
e in
terv
entio
ns a
ccor
ding
to th
e re
sults
of t
he M
&E
in a
n ho
nest
and
fair
way
.
21. I
cons
isten
tly fo
llow
the
stan
dard
pro
cedu
res a
nd sc
hedu
les i
n co
nduc
ting
M&
E.
22
. I a
m o
rgan
ized
and
have
a sy
stem
in k
eepi
ng M
&E
data
and
repo
rts r
eadi
ly a
cces
sible
.
23. I
can
mak
e co
rrec
t jud
gmen
ts a
nd d
ecisi
ons b
ased
on
fact
s and
ava
ilabl
e da
ta.
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 77
SELF-ASSESSMENT FORMSPersonnel Category D
Page
| 1
PERS
ONNE
L CAT
EGOR
Y D
PLAN
NING
1.
Com
pete
ncy:
Con
trib
ute
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
P1-K
1. S
tate
and
im
port
ance
of c
oast
al
and
mar
ine
reso
urce
s
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces
in y
our a
rea?
Wha
t is t
he im
port
ance
of m
anag
ing
thes
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces?
P1
-K2.
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t was
you
r con
trib
utio
n to
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
cont
ents
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
P1-K
3. A
sses
smen
t/
Iden
tifica
tion
of
risks
/thr
eats
to th
e M
PA/N
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s add
ress
ed
by y
our M
PA/N
?
Wha
t are
the
impa
cts o
f the
se th
reat
s?
Page
| 2
2.
Com
pete
ncy:
Con
trib
ute
to th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
mon
itorin
g of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
P2
-K4.
Impl
emen
ting
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t are
the
MPA
/N a
ctio
n pl
ans t
hat
are
bein
g im
plem
ente
d?
Can
you
men
tion
som
e ac
tiviti
es in
the
plan
that
hav
e an
d ha
ve n
ot b
een
done
?
P2
-S1.
Ade
pt in
m
onito
ring
and
impl
emen
tatio
n pr
oced
ures
How
do
you
cont
ribut
e to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
pro
gram
s and
st
rate
gies
indi
cate
d in
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
P2
-S2.
Mon
itorin
g th
reat
s to
the
MPA
/N
How
do
you
mon
itor t
he th
reat
s to
MPA
/N?
Page
| 3
FINA
NCIN
G 3.
Com
pete
ncy:
Bas
ic fil
ing,
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
and
ass
ets
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
F3-K
5. B
asic
proc
edur
es fo
r fin
ancia
l m
anag
emen
t
Wha
t are
the
pres
crib
ed p
roce
dure
s fo
llow
ed in
you
r offi
ce re
late
d to
fin
ancia
l man
agem
ent (
e.g.
bo
okke
epin
g, a
ccou
ntin
g, in
vent
ory,
au
ditin
g, e
tc.)?
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
fin
ancia
l man
agem
ent?
If y
es, n
ame
the
trai
ning
s.
F3
-S3.
Bas
ic do
cum
enta
tion
&
book
keep
ing
skill
s
How
do
you
help
in d
ocum
entin
g fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
and
bo
okke
epin
g?
F3
-K6.
Fam
iliar
ity
with
ass
ets,
mat
eria
ls an
d eq
uipm
ent
Wha
t are
the
asse
ts, e
quip
men
t and
m
ater
ials
that
you
hav
e fo
r the
M
PA/N
?
Do y
ou th
ink
thes
e m
ater
ials
and
equi
pmen
t are
suffi
cient
for t
he
effe
ctiv
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
?
Page
| 4
F3-S
4. B
asic
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce sk
ills
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at a
ll eq
uipm
ent a
nd m
ater
ials
for t
he
MPA
/N a
re a
ccou
nted
for a
nd a
re
wor
king
pro
perly
? De
scrib
e br
iefly
.
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
in
vent
ory
or m
aint
enan
ce o
f eq
uipm
ent?
List
trai
ning
s rec
eive
d.
COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
4.
Com
pete
ncy:
Hel
p pr
omot
e aw
aren
ess,
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d su
ppor
t of a
nd fo
r the
MPA
/N sy
stem
and
its v
alue
s
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Answ
er
C4
-K7.
MPA
/N
info
rmat
ion
that
ne
eds t
o be
co
mm
unica
ted
with
in a
nd o
utsid
e th
e m
anag
emen
t bo
dy
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant
conc
epts
/info
rmat
ion
abou
t MPA
/Ns
that
the
peop
le/c
omm
unity
shou
ld
know
abo
ut?
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut
the
MPA
/N in
you
r are
a?
C4-S
5. E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
com
mun
icate
with
the
mem
bers
of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent
body
so th
at y
our i
deas
for t
he M
PA/N
pl
an (d
evel
opm
ent,
upda
ting)
and
its
impl
emen
tatio
n w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
/inclu
ded?
Page
| 5
How
do
you
com
mun
icate
with
oth
er
stak
ehol
ders
to p
rom
ote
thei
r aw
aren
ess a
nd su
ppor
t tow
ards
the
MPA
/N?
C4
-S6.
Coo
rdin
atio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith m
embe
rs o
f th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent b
ody?
Why
di
d yo
u en
gage
with
them
(e.g
. ap
prov
al o
f the
man
agem
ent p
lan,
te
am b
uild
ing,
dev
elop
ing
the
M&
E pl
an, e
nfor
cem
ent,
feed
back
act
iviti
es
etc.
)?
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs
and
othe
r age
ncie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N?
Why
did
yo
u en
gage
with
them
(e.g
. fee
dbac
k ac
tiviti
es, c
onsu
ltatio
n, e
nfor
cem
ent
etc.
)?
C4-S
7. P
eopl
e sk
ills
Desc
ribe
your
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
with
1) m
embe
rs o
f the
man
agem
ent
body
and
2) s
take
hold
ers.
How
do
you
hand
le d
isagr
eem
ents
be
twee
n m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
or
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y?
Page
| 6
ENFO
RCEM
ENT
5. C
ompe
tenc
y: P
reve
ntio
n an
d de
tect
ion
of il
lega
l act
iviti
es
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
E5-K
8. La
ws r
elat
ed
to M
PA/N
s W
hat p
ertin
ent n
atio
nal l
aws,
loca
l or
dina
nces
and
oth
er is
suan
ces r
elat
ed
to M
PA/N
s tha
t you
kno
w o
f?
Wha
t are
the
proh
ibite
d an
d al
low
ed
activ
ities
in y
our M
PA/N
?
E5
-K9.
Enf
orce
men
t st
rate
gies
De
scrib
e m
ajor
stra
tegi
es re
late
d to
pr
even
tion
and
dete
ctio
n be
ing
impl
emen
ted
in th
e M
PA/N
.
Wha
t is y
our r
ole
in th
e pr
even
tion
and
dete
ctio
n st
ages
of M
PA/N
en
forc
emen
t?
E5-S
8. E
nfor
cem
ent
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u pr
even
t and
det
ect i
llega
l ac
tiviti
es?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
th
e pr
even
tion
and
dete
ctio
n of
ille
gal
activ
ities
? Na
me
the
trai
ning
s.
Page
| 7
6.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e an
d pr
oper
app
rehe
nsio
n of
susp
ects
and
viol
ator
s
E6-K
10. D
etai
led
know
ledg
e on
pe
nalti
es a
nd fi
nes
acco
rdin
g to
law
s and
or
dina
nces
Wha
t are
the
fines
and
pen
altie
s of
proh
ibite
d ac
tiviti
es in
you
r MPA
/N a
s in
dica
ted
in e
xistin
g la
ws a
nd
ordi
nanc
es?
E6
-K11
. Pro
per
appr
ehen
sion
proc
edur
es
Desc
ribe
the
gene
ral a
ppre
hens
ion
proc
edur
es fo
r vio
lato
rs in
you
r M
PA/N
.
Wha
t is y
our r
ole
in th
e ap
preh
ensio
n st
age
of M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t?
E6-K
12. R
ight
s of
deta
inee
s, su
spec
ts
and
witn
esse
s
Wha
t are
the
right
s of d
etai
nees
, su
spec
ts, a
nd w
itnes
ses?
Page
| 8
E6-S
9. E
nfor
cem
ent
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u en
sure
that
you
follo
w
prop
er a
ppre
hens
ion
proc
edur
es?
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
th
e ap
preh
ensio
n of
susp
ecte
d vi
olat
ors?
List
enf
orce
men
t-rel
ated
tr
aini
ngs a
tten
ded.
7. C
ompe
tenc
y: D
ocum
enta
tion
and
feed
back
of e
nfor
cem
ent a
ctiv
ities
E7-K
13. B
asic
docu
men
tatio
n fo
r en
forc
emen
t pr
oced
ures
Wha
t is t
he p
roce
ss o
f doc
umen
tatio
n of
enf
orce
men
t act
iviti
es?
Wha
t are
the
docu
men
tatio
n re
quire
men
ts n
eede
d in
ap
preh
ensio
n?
E7-K
14. D
etai
ls of
le
gal p
roce
sses
De
scrib
e th
e pr
oces
s for
filin
g ca
ses
agai
nst a
ppre
hend
ed v
iola
tors
, i.e
. fil
ing
the
polic
e re
port
or b
lott
er;
Cour
t pro
cedu
res?
Page
| 9
MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
8. C
ompe
tenc
y: C
ondu
ct o
f mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
An
swer
M8-
K15.
MPA
/ Ne
twor
k ob
ject
ives
W
hat a
re th
e ob
ject
ives
of t
he
MPA
/N?
Wha
t ind
icato
r/s n
eed
to b
e m
onito
red
to d
eter
min
e if
thes
e ob
ject
ives
are
bei
ng m
et?
M8-
K16.
MPA
/N
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
prog
ram
Wha
t is m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n an
d w
hy is
it im
port
ant?
Does
you
r MPA
/N h
ave
a M
&E
prog
ram
? If
yes
, wha
t was
you
r in
volv
emen
t in
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e M
&E
prog
ram
?
M
8-K1
7.
Com
pone
nts o
f the
M
&E
prog
ram
-
Perfo
rman
ce
M&
E sy
stem
-
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M
&E
syst
em
- So
cio-e
cono
mic
M&
E sy
stem
Wha
t are
the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of
your
M&
E pr
ogra
m –
doe
s it i
nclu
de a
co
mpo
nent
on
perfo
rman
ce o
f m
anag
emen
t bod
y, e
colo
gica
l co
mpo
nent
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
com
pone
nt?
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f eac
h co
mpo
nent
?
Page
| 1
0
M
8-K1
8. In
dica
tors
us
ed in
M&
E
- Pe
rform
ance
M&
E -
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M&
E -
Socio
-eco
nom
ic M
&E
Wha
t are
the
indi
cato
rs th
at y
ou
mon
itor f
or e
ach
of th
e m
ain
com
pone
nts o
f you
r M&
E pr
ogra
m?
In
the
tabl
e on
the
right
, che
ck th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify
how
ofte
n th
ey a
re m
onito
red
(ann
ual,
quar
terly
). Ac
rony
ms u
sed:
M
EAT
– M
PA M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s As
sess
men
t Too
l M
ETT
– M
anag
emen
t Effe
ctiv
enes
s Tra
ckin
g To
ol
NEAT
– N
etw
ork
Effe
ctiv
enes
s Ass
essm
ent T
ool
CPUE
– C
atch
per
uni
t effo
rt
Chec
k th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify h
ow o
ften
they
are
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Indi
cato
rs
Chec
k if
mon
itore
d Sc
hedu
le o
f m
onito
ring
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A.
Leve
l & ra
ting
(MEA
T)
B. S
core
(MET
T)
C. Le
vel &
ratin
g (N
EAT)
D.
Oth
er:
ECOL
OGIC
AL
A. %
live
cora
l cov
er
B. F
ish b
iom
ass (
tons
/sq.
km)
C. %
seag
rass
cove
r or d
ensit
y
D.
Num
ber o
f spe
cies:
1.
Fish
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
E. %
man
grov
e ca
nopy
cove
r
F.
Tot
al a
rea
(hec
tare
s)
1. C
oral
reef
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
G. M
arin
e m
amm
al si
ghtin
gs &
mor
talit
ies (
spec
ies)
H.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A. H
ouse
hold
inco
me
B. F
ish ca
tch
(CPU
E)
C. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
Page
| 1
1
M
8-S1
0. E
ffect
ivel
y co
nduc
t M&
E su
rvey
s Do
you
cond
uct M
&E
surv
eys (
i.e.
perfo
rman
ce, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic,
ecol
ogica
l)?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
yo
ur sk
ills o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht.
SCAL
E:
0 –
None
1
– W
ith tr
aini
ng/ h
as a
ssist
ed a
few
tim
es
2 –
Can
perfo
rm w
ith m
inim
um
s
uper
visio
n 3
– Ca
n pe
rform
inde
pend
ently
4
– Ca
n su
perv
ise a
gro
up
Have
you
rece
ived
any
trai
ning
s on
MPA
/N M
&E
surv
eys/
met
hods
? Lis
t tr
aini
ngs r
ecei
ved.
Ac
rony
ms u
sed:
CP
CE –
Cor
al p
oint
coun
t with
Exc
el e
xten
sions
SE
AT –
Soc
io-e
cono
mic
Asse
ssm
ent T
ool
SocM
on –
Soc
ioec
onom
ic M
onito
ring
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox u
sing
the
indi
cate
d sc
ale
(see
left
colu
mn)
.
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
skill
s 0
1 2
3 4
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A. M
EAT
B.
MET
T
C. N
EAT
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL/ B
IOPH
YSIC
AL
A.
Cor
al re
ef a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
1. M
anta
tow
2
. Lin
e in
terc
ept t
rans
ect (
LIT)
3
. Pho
toqu
adra
t &CP
CE
4. F
ish v
isual
cens
us (F
VC)
5. R
eef C
heck
B. S
eagr
ass a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
C.
Sea
wee
d as
sess
men
t & m
onito
ring
D.
Bea
ch fo
rest
ass
essm
ent &
mon
itorin
g
E. In
vert
ebra
te a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
F.
Cet
acea
n id
entif
icatio
n/ su
rvey
G. M
arin
e tu
rtle
iden
tifica
tion/
surv
ey
H.
Sea
bird
surv
ey
I.
Othe
r (pl
s. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A.
SEA
T
B.So
cMon
C. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
Page
| 1
2
9. C
ompe
tenc
y: A
ssist
in p
repa
ratio
n of
repo
rts a
nd fe
edba
ck a
ctiv
ities
M9-
K19.
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
resu
lts
Why
is it
impo
rtan
t to
repo
rt M
&E
resu
lts?
M9-
S11.
Dat
a co
nsol
idat
ion,
an
alys
is an
d in
terp
reta
tion
(inclu
ding
conf
iden
ce
leve
l), te
chni
cal
writ
ing,
effe
ctiv
e fe
edba
ck a
nd
pres
enta
tion
skill
s of
M&
E re
sults
How
do
you
cons
olid
ate,
ana
lyse
dat
a an
d pr
esen
t M&
E re
sults
?
Have
you
rece
ived
any
trai
ning
s on
data
cons
olid
atio
n an
d an
alys
is? If
yes
, lis
t tra
inin
gs re
ceiv
ed.
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
by ti
ckin
g a
box
usin
g th
e in
dica
ted
scal
e.
SCAL
E: 0
– N
one,
1 –
With
trai
ning
/ has
ass
isted
a fe
w ti
mes
, 2 –
Can
per
form
with
min
imum
su
perv
ision
, 3 –
Can
per
form
inde
pend
ently
, 4 –
Can
supe
rvise
/ tea
ch o
ther
s
Le
vel o
f con
fiden
ce in
dat
a an
alys
is &
inte
rpre
tatio
n (e
ncirc
le y
our a
nsw
er):
NON
E
LOW
FAI
RLY
CONF
IDEN
T
VER
Y CO
NFID
ENT
SKILL
S 0
1 2
3 4
1. B
asic
Exce
l
2. S
PSS
3.
R S
tudi
o
4. Li
st o
ther
tool
s you
kno
w a
nd u
se:
5. T
echn
ical w
ritin
g
6. F
eedb
acki
ng
7.
Pre
sent
atio
n sk
ills
Ho
w d
o yo
u gi
ve fe
edba
ck a
bout
the
M&
E re
sults
(e.g
. sub
miss
ion
of
repo
rts,
publ
ic pr
esen
tatio
ns, e
tc.)?
Ho
w w
ould
you
rate
you
r lev
el o
f co
nfid
ence
in d
ata
anal
ysis
and
inte
rpre
tatio
n?
Page
| 1
3
10. C
ompe
tenc
y: A
ssist
in m
anag
ing
data
for e
asy
acce
ss
M
10-K
20.
Mec
hani
sm/s
yste
m
of d
ata
man
agem
ent
Desc
ribe
your
dat
a m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
/mec
hani
sm.
M
10-S
12.
Orga
niza
tion
and
stor
age
How
do
you
help
org
anize
and
stor
e da
ta a
nd re
port
s?
Ca
n da
ta a
nd re
port
s be
easil
y ac
cess
ed (i
.e. c
an d
ata
and
repo
rts
from
201
0 an
d 20
15 st
ill b
e re
trie
ved)
?
Page
| 1
4
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (SC
ORE)
Not a
t al
l So
me-
times
Mos
t of
the
time
All
the
time
1.
I am
hon
est a
nd tr
uthf
ul in
all
my
deal
ings
.
2.
I am
app
roac
habl
e an
d ea
sy to
talk
with
.
3.
I am
will
ing
to le
arn
new
idea
s and
skill
s.
4.
I con
trib
ute
idea
s and
mak
e su
gges
tions
bas
ed o
n fa
cts.
5.
I am
dili
gent
and
har
dwor
king
to a
ccom
plish
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f our
MPA
/N.
6.
I s
triv
e to
per
form
my
dutie
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s to
the
best
of m
y ab
ilitie
s and
with
out a
ny v
este
d in
tere
st.
7.
I adh
ere
to th
e st
anda
rds o
f tra
nspa
renc
y an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
in k
eepi
ng fi
nanc
ial r
ecor
ds.
8.
I c
an d
o m
y fin
ancia
l and
adm
inist
rativ
e du
ties i
n a
syst
emat
ic an
d ef
ficie
nt m
anne
r.
9.
I am
met
iculo
us a
nd I
alw
ays s
ee to
it th
at th
e fu
nds a
re sp
ent w
isely
and
frug
ally
, and
liqu
idat
ed p
rope
rly a
nd o
n
time.
10
. I a
m a
lway
s cou
rteo
us a
nd re
spec
tful w
hen
com
mun
icatin
g w
ith e
very
one
rega
rdle
ss o
f the
ir ra
nk, p
ositi
on,
cond
ition
, gen
der a
nd b
elie
fs.
11
. In
the
perfo
rman
ce o
f my
dutie
s on
enfo
rcem
ent I
am
alw
ays r
espe
ctfu
l of p
eopl
e an
d th
eir r
ight
s.
12
. I a
m fa
ir an
d ho
nest
in e
nfor
cing
the
law
.
13. I
am
cour
ageo
us a
nd m
indf
ul o
f the
law
whe
n co
nduc
ting
enfo
rcem
ent a
ctiv
ities
.
14. I
am
obs
erva
nt a
nd co
nscie
ntio
us in
adh
erin
g to
the
proc
edur
es o
f enf
orce
men
t.
15. I
am
a te
am p
laye
r and
can
wor
k in
colla
bora
tion
with
oth
er e
nfor
cem
ent g
roup
s.
16
. I a
m o
rgan
ized
and
have
a sy
stem
of k
eepi
ng d
ata,
reco
rds a
nd in
form
atio
n pr
oper
ly a
nd re
adily
acc
essib
le.
92 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
EVALUATION RESULT SHEETS
SUMMARYOFCOMPETENCEASSESSMENTRESULTS Name:__________________________________________________No.ofYearsinService:_______
Office/Designation:_________________________________________________________________
NameofMPA/Nbeingmanaged:______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Criteria TotalScore CompetenceLevel* Remarks
Knowledge
Skills
Attitude
Recommendations:_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
CATEGORYAPERSONNEL
Component
Knowledge(K) Skills(S) Attitude(A)Total
AvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablePoints
ActualScore %
1.Planning 10 10 12 2.Financing 7 5 3 3.Communications 4 10 3 4.Enforcement 17 4 6 5.MonitoringandEvaluation
13 2 9
TotalScore 51 31 33
Attitudes(General) 24 PositivitytoWork(AllWorkAttitudes) 57
*Totalscore(COMPETENCELEVEL): KNOWLEDGE 0-17–LOW18-34–MODERATE35-51–HIGH SKILLS 0-10–LOW11-20–MODERATE21-31–HIGH ATTITUDE0-19–LOW20-38–MODERATE39-57–HIGH
SUMMARYOFCOMPETENCEASSESSMENTRESULTS Name:_________________________________________________No.ofYearsinService:________
Office/Designation:__________________________________________________________________
NameofMPA/Nbeingmanaged:______________________________________________________
Criteria TotalScore CompetenceLevel* Remarks
Knowledge
Skills
Attitude
Recommendations:__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
CATEGORYBPERSONNEL
Component
Knowledge(K) Skills(S) Attitude(A)Total
AvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablePoints
ActualScore %
1.Planning 16 7 9 2.Financing 13 12 15 3.Communications 7 8 3 4.Enforcement 16 6 15 5.MonitoringandEvaluation
17 12 15
TotalScore 69 45 57
Attitudes(General) 21 PositivitytoWork(AllWorkAttitudes) 78
*Totalscore(COMPETENCELEVEL): KNOWLEDGE 0-23–LOW24-46–MODERATE47-69–HIGH SKILLS 0-15–LOW16-30–MODERATE31-45–HIGH ATTITUDE0-26–LOW27-52–MODERATE53-78–HIGH
SUMMARYOFCOMPETENCEASSESSMENTRESULTS Name:__________________________________________________No.ofYearsinService:_______
Office/Designation:_________________________________________________________________
NameofMPA/Nbeingmanaged:______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Criteria TotalScore CompetenceLevel* Remarks
Knowledge
Skills
Attitude
Recommendations:_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
CATEGORYCPERSONNEL
Component
Knowledge(K) Skills(S) Attitude(A)Total
AvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablepoints
ActualScore %
1.Planning 10 4 3 2.Financing 14 8 15 3.Communications 4 12 6 4.Enforcement 18 9 12 5.MonitoringandEvaluation
14 10 15
TotalScore 60 43 51
Attitudes(General) 18 PositivitytoWork(AllWorkAttitudes) 69
*Totalscore(COMPETENCELEVEL): KNOWLEDGE 0-20–LOW21-40–MODERATE41-60–HIGH SKILLS 0-14–LOW15-29–MODERATE30-43–HIGH ATTITUDE0-23–LOW24-46–MODERATE47-69–HIGH
SUMMARYOFCOMPETENCEASSESSMENTRESULTS Name:__________________________________________________No.ofYearsinService:_______
Office/Designation:_________________________________________________________________
NameofMPA/Nbeingmanaged:______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Criteria TotalScore CompetenceLevel* Remarks
Knowledge
Skills
Attitude
Recommendations:_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
CATEGORYDPERSONNEL
Component
Knowledge(K) Skills(S) Attitude(A)Total
AvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablePoints
ActualScore %
TotalAvailablePoints
ActualScore %
1.Planning 10 4 0 2.Financing 4 4 9 3.Communications 2 8 3 4.Enforcement 18 7 15 5.MonitoringandEvaluation
14 8 3
TotalScore 48 31 30
Attitudes(General) 18 PositivitytoWork(AllWorkAttitudes) 48
*Totalscore(COMPETENCELEVEL): KNOWLEDGE 0-16–LOW17-32–MODERATE33-48–HIGH SKILLS 0-10–LOW11-20–MODERATE21-31–HIGH ATTITUDE0-16–LOW17-32–MODERATE33-48–HIGH
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 97
GUIDE TO ADMINISTERING THE TOOL AND SCORING
Personnel Category A
Page
| 1
PE
RSON
NEL C
ATEG
ORY
A Gu
ide
to A
dmin
ister
ing t
he T
ool &
Sco
ring
PL
ANNI
NG
1. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t, re
view
and
upd
atin
g of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g P1
-K1.
Stat
e an
d im
port
ance
of c
oast
al
and
mar
ine
reso
urce
s
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces i
n yo
ur
area
?
Wha
t is t
he im
port
ance
of e
stab
lishi
ng
MPA
/Ns?
Desc
ribe
the
stat
e of
coas
tal a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
seag
rass
/ man
grov
e/ co
ral
reef
s/ fi
sher
ies e
tc.)
of th
e ar
ea:
• W
here
are
they
loca
ted?
•
Can
you
estim
ate
thei
r size
(hec
tare
s), c
over
(per
cent
, lus
h, th
ick, e
tc.)
and
cond
ition
(poo
r, go
od, e
xcel
lent
)?
• Ho
w a
bout
the
fish
catc
h of
fish
erm
en –
wha
t is t
he a
vera
ge fi
sh ca
tch?
Kn
ows i
mpo
rtan
ce o
f mar
ine
reso
urce
s suc
h as
: •
Prov
ision
ing
– so
urce
of f
ood
(fish
, she
llfish
, sea
wee
d, ti
mbe
r, dr
ugs,
etc.
•
Regu
latin
g –
coas
tal p
rote
ctio
n, p
reve
ntio
n of
ero
sion,
wat
er p
urifi
catio
n,
carb
on st
orag
e •
Cultu
ral,
spiri
tual
, bea
uty
Know
s the
ben
efits
of M
PAs,
such
as:
• Pr
otec
t im
port
ant h
abita
ts a
nd b
iodi
vers
ity
• He
lp re
stor
e pr
oduc
tivity
of o
cean
s – h
alt o
r rev
erse
fish
erie
s dec
line
and
impr
ove
fish
catc
h •
Pres
erve
are
as fo
r tou
rism
and
pro
vide
mor
e ec
onom
ic op
port
uniti
es
• Pr
ovid
e op
port
uniti
es fo
r stu
dy, r
esea
rch
and
trai
ning
2=ca
n de
scrib
e st
atus
of r
esou
rces
1=
can
desc
ribe
at le
ast 1
( p
lus "
1", i
f kno
ws i
mpo
rtan
ce)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
P1-K
2. M
PA/N
etw
ork
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t was
you
r par
ticip
atio
n in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f you
r MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pl
an?
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s affe
ctin
g yo
ur
mar
ine
reso
urce
s?
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant c
ompo
nent
s of
the
man
agem
ent p
lan
(e.g
. M&
E,
Enfo
rcem
ent,
etc.
)?
Invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of M
PA/N
man
agem
ent:
•
High
ly in
volv
ed (a
nd ca
n de
scrib
e pr
oces
s of d
evel
opm
ent)
• M
oder
atel
y in
volv
ed
• Lit
tle in
volv
emen
t (e.
g. si
gnin
g in
vitat
ion
lett
ers,
etc.
) •
No in
volv
emen
t at a
ll
Know
s the
maj
or th
reat
s affe
ctin
g th
eir m
arin
e re
sour
ces,
such
as:
•
Over
-ext
ract
ion
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces
• Re
clam
atio
n or
conv
ersio
n of
cert
ain
part
s of t
he se
a fo
r oth
er u
ses (
e.g.
fis
h po
nds,
port
s, hu
man
settl
emen
t are
as)
• Ill
egal
fish
ing
prac
tices
: ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
2=Hi
ghly
invo
lved
& ca
n id
entif
y th
reat
s 1=
mod
erat
ely
invo
lved
& ca
n id
entif
y th
reat
s 0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s con
tent
s of p
lan)
(M
ax=3
poi
nts)
Page
| 2
•
Sedi
men
tatio
n •
Pollu
tion
•
Inad
equa
te su
ppor
t (e.
g., e
xecu
tive,
legi
slativ
e, p
erso
nnel
, etc
.) to
man
age
mar
ine
reso
urce
s pro
perly
•
Othe
r thr
eats
: ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
•
Has a
n id
ea o
f the
gen
eral
cont
ents
of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
such
as:
•
Ratio
nale
and
pur
pose
of M
PA/N
or V
ision
, Miss
ion
and
Goal
setti
ng
• Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
mar
ine
reso
urce
s •
Lega
l fra
mew
ork
• Or
gani
zatio
nal s
truct
ure
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Stra
tegi
c act
ion
plan
s (fo
r M&
E, E
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
) •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Pena
lties
and
fine
s •
Othe
r ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
•
P1
-S1.
Att
entio
n to
de
tail
in re
view
ing
and
upda
ting
the
man
agem
ent p
lan
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at th
e pl
an is
ad
equa
tely
revi
ewed
and
upd
ated
? Br
iefly
de
scrib
e th
e pr
oces
s. Ho
w o
ften
is it
revi
ewed
and
upd
ated
?
• Pa
ys a
ttent
ion
to d
etai
l and
can
desc
ribe
the
proc
ess o
f rev
iew
and
upd
atin
g;
know
s man
y im
port
ant p
oint
s in
the
plan
whi
ch a
ddre
ss sp
ecifi
c iss
ues i
n th
e pr
otec
ted
area
; can
des
crib
e th
e re
leva
nce
of th
e pl
an, a
s wel
l as s
ay if
the
plan
is
uniq
ue a
nd co
mpl
ete
•
• Lit
tle a
ttent
ion
to d
etai
l – ca
n on
ly de
scrib
e at
leas
t 1 p
oint
in th
e pr
opos
ed p
lan
or
polic
y w
hich
add
ress
es a
n iss
ue in
the
prot
ecte
d ar
ea
•
2=ca
n de
scrib
e pr
oces
s and
kno
ws
man
y im
port
ant p
oint
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast o
ne
0=ca
nnot
cite
or d
escr
ibe
any
P1-S
2. D
raw
less
ons
from
MPA
/N b
est
prac
tices
Plea
se ci
te M
PA/N
bes
t pra
ctice
s in
your
are
a or
oth
er p
lace
s.
Are
you
adop
ting
them
in y
our a
rea?
Best
pra
ctice
s in
enfo
rcem
ent,
sust
aina
bilit
y fin
ancin
g or
ince
ntiv
e sc
hem
e (s
uch
as
awar
ding
of B
est B
anta
y Da
gat,
Best
MPA
etc
.):
• Kn
ows 2
or m
ore
MPA
/N b
est p
ract
ices
• Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
MPA
/N b
est p
ract
ice
• W
ill re
plica
te th
e M
PA/N
bes
t pra
ctice
s •
Does
not
kno
w a
ny M
PA/N
bes
t pra
ctice
s
2=ca
n cit
e m
any
prac
tices
1=
can
cite
at le
ast o
ne
0= N
o an
swer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f has
pla
ns to
repl
icate
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
P1-S
3. Le
ader
ship
and
de
cisio
n-m
akin
g sk
ills
Can
you
cite
inst
ance
s whe
n yo
u ha
d to
m
ake
decis
ions
abo
ut M
PA/N
im
plem
enta
tion?
W
ere
you
able
to m
ake
your
par
tner
s and
te
am m
embe
rs a
gree
with
you
r dec
ision
? Ho
w d
o yo
u m
otiv
ate
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
othe
r sta
keho
lder
s to
sust
ain
thei
r effo
rts f
or th
e M
PA/N
?
Show
s lea
ders
hip
and
decis
ion-
mak
ing
skill
s by:
•
Atte
ndin
g m
eetin
gs a
nd co
mm
unica
ting
regu
larly
with
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bo
dy
• Se
ekin
g up
date
s with
the
pers
on in
char
ge o
f the
MPA
/N’s
daily
ope
ratio
ns
• Ac
ting
on im
port
ant a
nd u
rgen
t mat
ters
that
will
hel
p th
e M
PA/N
•
Mak
ing
decis
ions
bas
ed o
n fa
cts a
nd in
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
man
agem
ent
body
and
rele
vant
stak
ehol
ders
& p
artn
ers
Can
c ite
exam
ples
of s
uch
activ
ities
and
initi
ativ
es d
one.
2=cit
es m
any
lead
ersh
ip &
de
cisio
n-m
akin
g in
itiat
ives
1=
few
lead
ersh
ip &
dec
ision
-m
akin
g in
itiat
ives
0=
none
(p
lus “
1”, i
f can
cite
st
rate
gies
/exa
mpl
es)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
Page
| 3
2.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
adop
tion
of m
anag
emen
t pla
n an
d su
ppor
ting
polic
ies/
legi
slatio
n
P2-K
3. E
ffect
ive
polic
ies t
hat p
rovi
de
bene
fits t
o M
PA/N
s
Wha
t pol
icies
shou
ld b
e in
pla
ce to
supp
ort
and/
or co
mpl
emen
t the
MPA
/N?
W
hich
pol
icies
are
curr
ently
bei
ng
impl
emen
ted
in y
our a
rea?
Able
to m
entio
n pe
rtin
ent n
atio
nal l
aws a
s wel
l as l
ocal
ord
inan
ces e
nact
ed:
• Kn
ows 2
or m
ore
polic
ies (
e.g.
Fish
erie
s Cod
e, Z
onin
g/ C
LUW
P, T
ouris
m,
etc.
) com
plem
enta
ry/ s
uppo
rtiv
e of
the
MPA
/N a
nd w
heth
er th
ese
are
bein
g im
plem
ente
d in
the
area
•
Know
s at l
east
1 p
olicy
com
plem
enta
ry/ s
uppo
rtiv
e of
the
MPA
/N a
nd
whe
ther
thes
e ar
e be
ing
impl
emen
ted
in th
e ar
ea
2=ca
n cit
e m
any
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
P2-K
4. P
roce
dure
s and
ap
prov
al o
f pol
icies
, le
gisla
tions
and
iss
uanc
es in
supp
ortin
g M
PA/N
s
Wha
t are
the
step
s nee
ded
for t
he
enac
tmen
t/ad
optio
n of
: 1.
the
man
agem
ent p
lan?
2.
the
polic
ies s
uppo
rtin
g M
PA/N
im
plem
enta
tion?
W
hat w
as y
our p
artic
ipat
ion
in th
e en
actm
ent a
nd/o
r ado
ptio
n of
the
man
agem
ent p
lan
and
polic
ies?
• Kn
ows a
ll th
e st
eps t
hat n
eed
to b
e fo
llow
ed/d
one
for t
he e
nact
men
t/
adop
tion
of th
e po
licie
s, le
gisla
tions
and
ord
ers s
uppo
rtin
g th
e M
PA/N
•
Know
s at l
east
1 st
ep th
at n
eed
to b
e fo
llow
ed/d
one
for t
he e
nact
men
t/
adop
tion
of th
e po
licie
s, le
gisla
tions
and
ord
ers s
uppo
rtin
g th
e M
PA/N
Pa
rtici
patio
n in
the
adop
tion/
appr
oval
of p
olici
es:
• Hi
ghly
invo
lved
•
Mod
erat
ely
invo
lved
•
Little
invo
lvem
ent
• No
invo
lvem
ent a
t all
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
P2-S
4. A
tten
tion
to
deta
il in
ado
ptin
g pr
otec
ted
area
pol
icy
and
legi
slatio
n
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at th
e or
dina
nce/
polic
y is
suffi
cient
in fo
rm a
nd
subs
tanc
e?
Can
desc
ribe
and
expl
ain
cert
ain
deta
ils o
f the
pol
icy/ l
egisl
atio
n en
acte
d:
• M
ore
than
2 d
etai
ls de
scrib
ed
• Ca
n de
scrib
e on
ly 1
det
ail
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l det
ails
1=ca
n cit
e on
ly 1
0=
None
FUNC
TION
: FIN
ANCI
NG
3. C
ompe
tenc
y: A
ble
to m
obili
ze su
stai
nabl
e fu
ndin
g and
reso
urce
s for
pro
tect
ed a
reas
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g F3
-K5.
Sta
tus o
f ex
istin
g M
PA/N
s and
th
eir f
inan
cial n
eeds
Wha
t are
the
finan
cial n
eeds
of y
our M
PA/N
?
Can
you
nam
e so
me
of th
em (e
.g.
enfo
rcem
ent i
nclu
ding
dur
ing
litig
atio
n pr
oces
s, M
&E,
IEC,
infra
stru
ctur
e, e
tc.)?
Ar
e th
ere
fund
s to
suffi
cient
ly su
ppor
t the
se
need
s? E
xpla
in y
our a
nsw
er.
Can
desc
ribe
the
basic
fina
ncia
l nee
ds o
f the
MPA
/N su
ch a
s: •
Oper
atin
g ex
pens
es (e
.g. E
nfor
cem
ent,
M&
E, IE
C ac
tiviti
es a
nd e
vent
s, tr
aini
ng, m
eetin
gs, c
omm
unica
tion,
trav
el, e
tc.)
• Hu
man
reso
urce
s/pe
rson
al se
rvice
s (e.
g. h
onor
aria
of B
anta
y Da
gat,
sala
ries/
wag
es o
f per
sonn
el, e
tc.)
• M
ater
ials
& e
quip
men
t (e.
g. fo
r M&
E –
tran
sect
line
s, GP
S, co
mpu
ter,
unde
rwat
er ca
mer
a; fo
r enf
orce
men
t – p
atro
l boa
ts, G
PS, e
tc.)
• In
frast
ruct
ure
(e.g
. gua
rd h
ouse
, mul
ti-pu
rpos
e ha
ll, e
tc.)
• Ot
hers
___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
Awar
e if
MPA
/N n
eeds
are
fully
-fund
ed o
r not
Ca
n de
scrib
e m
ajor
chal
leng
es th
at th
e M
PA/N
is e
xper
ienc
ing
in re
latio
n to
fin
ancin
g
3=ca
n cit
e m
any
2=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 2
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 4
F3
-K6.
Opt
ion
for
sour
ces o
f fun
ds a
nd
reso
urce
s to
supp
ort
the
MPA
/N
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
sour
ces o
f fu
nds/
reso
urce
s to
supp
ort t
he p
rogr
ams
and
activ
ities
of t
he M
PA/N
? Ci
te sp
ecifi
c ex
ampl
es.
Can
cite
exte
rnal
(nat
iona
l age
ncie
s, ac
adem
e, p
rivat
e or
gani
zatio
ns a
nd N
GOs,
etc.
) and
inte
rnal
sour
ces o
f fun
ding
and
oth
er re
sour
ces;
and
disc
uss h
ow th
ese
can
be a
cces
sed
such
as:
•
Gran
ts a
nd D
onat
ions
▪
Bila
tera
l & m
ultil
ater
al d
onor
s (ac
tivity
-bas
ed te
chni
cal a
ssist
ance
, tr
aini
ng, e
quip
men
t or i
nfra
stru
ctur
e) –
Supp
ort f
rom
NGA
s e.g
. DEN
R,
BFAR
, DOL
E, T
ESDA
, etc
.; Aca
dem
e (S
choo
ls, C
olle
ges &
Uni
vers
ities
) ▪
Foun
datio
ns (e
.g. F
PE, C
CEF,
Mal
ampa
ya, e
tc.)
▪ Su
ppor
t fro
m N
GOs
▪ Su
ppor
t fro
m p
rivat
e se
ctor
/com
pani
es (i
.e. t
hrou
gh th
eir C
SR)
▪ Lo
cal/I
nter
natio
nal p
roje
ct fu
ndin
g ▪
Cons
erva
tion
Trus
t Fun
ds
• To
urism
Rev
enue
s (en
tran
ce fe
es, u
ser f
ees,
etc.
) •
Inte
grat
ed P
rote
cted
Are
a Fu
nd (I
PAF)
– fo
r NIP
As
2=ca
n cit
e m
any
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=N o
ans
wer
F3-K
7. E
ffect
ive
polic
ies a
nd st
rate
gies
to
ens
ure
finan
cial a
nd
logi
stic
supp
ort t
o M
PA/N
s
Wha
t pol
icies
/str
ateg
ies s
houl
d be
in p
lace
to
ens
ure
that
fund
s are
pro
vide
d fo
r the
im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
?
Are
thes
e be
ing
impl
emen
ted
in y
our
MPA
/N?
If ye
s, cit
e w
hich
one
s.
Know
s the
pol
icies
that
shou
ld b
e in
pla
ce to
ens
ure
that
fund
s and
supp
ort a
re
prov
ided
fund
ing
to th
e M
PA/N
(i.e
. pro
vide
s dire
ct fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt, t
hrou
gh
ince
ntiv
es, f
ines
& p
enal
ties,
etc.
) •
Fish
erie
s Cod
e (R
.A. 1
0654
) •
For N
IPAS
– N
IPAS
Act
, Gen
eral
App
ropr
iatio
ns A
ct
• Lo
cal o
rdin
ance
s
2=kn
ows l
ots
1=kn
ows 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
F3-S
5. A
lloca
te,
mob
ilize
and
out
sour
ce
fund
s and
reso
urce
s for
M
PA/N
How
do
you
allo
cate
and
prio
ritize
fund
s for
th
e M
PA/N
? Ho
w d
o yo
u he
lp g
ener
ate
fund
s/re
sour
ces
for t
he M
PA/N
?
Has k
now
ledg
e on
fina
ncia
l nee
ds o
f the
MPA
/N (p
er p
rogr
am e
.g. E
nfor
cem
ent,
M&
E, e
tc.),
pro
vide
s inf
orm
atio
n on
bud
get a
nd a
lloca
tion,
and
sour
ce o
f fun
ds
Can
desc
ribe
way
s to
gene
rate
fund
s for
the
MPA
/N
3=ca
n sp
ecify
bud
get p
er p
rogr
am,
allo
catio
n an
d fu
nd so
urce
s 2=
inco
mpl
ete
1=
know
s onl
y 1
aspe
ct
0= N
o an
swer
F3
-S6.
Ens
ure
sust
aina
ble
use
of
fund
s for
the
MPA
/N
How
do
you
ensu
re th
e su
stai
nabl
e us
e of
fu
nds a
nd re
sour
ces t
o su
ppor
t the
pro
gram
s an
d ac
tiviti
es o
f the
MPA
/N?
Cite
spec
ific
exam
ples
.
Can
desc
ribe
way
s and
stra
tegi
es to
pro
vide
fund
s and
oth
er re
sour
ces t
o su
stai
n M
PA/N
act
iviti
es.
2=cit
es se
vera
l exa
mpl
es
1=cit
es a
t lea
st 1
0=
No
answ
er
FUNC
TION
: COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
4.
Com
pete
ncy:
Fos
ter a
war
enes
s, un
ders
tand
ing
and
supp
ort o
f and
for t
he M
PA/N
syst
em a
nd it
s val
ues
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
C4-K
8. M
PA/N
in
form
atio
n th
at n
eeds
W
hat a
re th
e m
ost i
mpo
rtan
t co
ncep
ts/in
form
atio
n ab
out M
PA/N
s tha
t th
e pe
ople
/com
mun
ity sh
ould
kno
w a
bout
?
Can
cite
impo
rtan
t inf
orm
atio
n ab
out t
he M
PA/N
that
shou
ld b
e co
mm
unica
ted
to
the
com
mun
ity w
hich
coul
d in
clude
the
follo
win
g:
2=kn
ows l
ots
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 5
to
be
com
mun
icate
d w
ithin
and
out
side
the
man
agem
ent b
ody
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut th
e M
PA/N
in y
our a
rea?
• M
PA/N
obj
ectiv
es (e
.g. f
isher
ies m
anag
emen
t, bi
odive
rsity
cons
erva
tion,
ha
bita
t pro
tect
ion,
etc
.) •
MPA
/N th
reat
s (e.
g. o
verfi
shin
g, se
dim
enta
tion,
pol
lutio
n, e
tc.)
• Di
ffere
nt m
arin
e ha
bita
ts (c
oral
reef
, sea
gras
s, m
angr
ove)
•
Impo
rtan
ce o
f mar
ine
reso
urce
s (e.
g. p
rovi
sioni
ng, r
egul
atin
g, e
tc.)
• Be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
man
agem
ent
• La
ws a
nd p
olici
es re
late
d to
coas
tal a
nd m
arin
e en
viron
men
t and
reso
urce
s •
Rule
s & re
gula
tions
; wha
t is a
llow
ed a
nd p
rohi
bite
d in
the
MPA
/N
• Co
mm
unity
invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e M
PA/N
C4-K
9. E
ffect
ive
polic
ies t
hat p
rovi
de
bene
fits t
o th
e M
PA/N
Wha
t are
the
supp
ortin
g po
licie
s and
le
gisla
tions
for y
our M
PA/N
s tha
t sho
uld
be
wel
l-diss
emin
ated
?
Are
you
seei
ng b
enef
its fr
om th
ese
polic
ies?
W
hy d
o yo
u th
ink
so?
Can
iden
tify
supp
ortin
g po
licie
s and
legi
slatio
n fo
r the
MPA
/N (e
.g. F
isher
ies
Code
, Zon
ing/
CLU
WP,
Tou
rism
, etc
.) th
at n
eeds
to b
e w
ell-d
issem
inat
ed
Can
cite
the
bene
fits o
f the
se p
olici
es
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l pol
icies
and
as
sess
effe
ctiv
ity
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
C4-S
7. E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
harn
ess s
uppo
rt fo
r the
MPA
/N?
If
ther
e ar
e pe
ople
who
do
not s
uppo
rt th
e M
PA/N
, how
do
you
deal
and
com
mun
icate
w
ith th
em?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Able
to h
arne
ss su
ppor
t for
the
MPA
/N th
roug
h th
e fo
llow
ing:
•
Raisi
ng M
PA/N
conc
erns
in n
atio
nal,
regi
onal
and
loca
l mee
tings
and
ga
ther
ings
•
Prom
otin
g M
PA/N
by
supp
ortin
g in
stitu
tiona
l arr
ange
men
ts a
nd p
artn
ersh
ips
with
oth
er m
unici
palit
ies,
prov
ince
s and
/or n
etw
orks
•
Com
mun
icatin
g w
ith fu
ndin
g gr
oups
and
age
ncie
s to
gath
er fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt
• He
adin
g fu
nd-ra
ising
act
iviti
es
• Im
mer
sing
with
the
loca
l com
mun
ity
Able
to d
eal w
ith n
on-s
uppo
rter
s of t
he M
PA/N
thro
ugh
the
follo
win
g:
• In
terp
erso
nal (
face
-to-fa
ce d
ialo
gues
and
disc
ussio
ns w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs)
• Pr
ovisi
on o
f edu
catio
n an
d pr
omot
iona
l mat
eria
ls •
Form
al m
eetin
g w
ith o
fficia
l hea
d of
stak
ehol
der g
roup
•
Med
iate
d (s
endi
ng o
f let
ters
to st
akeh
olde
rs)
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l suc
cess
ful
exam
ples
1=
can
cite
1 0=
No a
nsw
er
C4-S
8. C
oord
inat
ion
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u en
gage
with
mem
bers
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y? W
hy d
id y
ou
enga
ge w
ith th
em?
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd
othe
r age
ncie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
M
PA/N
? W
hy d
id y
ou e
ngag
e w
ith th
em?
Can
desc
ribe
how
he/
she
coor
dina
tes w
ith m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bo
dy a
nd ci
te e
xam
ples
of h
is/he
r int
erac
tions
with
them
. Thi
s cou
ld in
clude
ac
tiviti
es su
ch a
s: •
Draf
ting
or u
pdat
ing
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
• Ap
prov
al o
f the
man
agem
ent p
lan
• Te
am-b
uild
ing
• D e
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an
• En
forc
emen
t pla
nnin
g an
d m
onito
ring
2=ca
n de
scrib
e ho
w h
e co
ordi
nate
s w
ith th
em
1=kn
ows o
nly
1 0=
N o a
nsw
er
(plu
s 1, i
f kno
ws w
hy h
e en
gage
s w
ith th
em
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
Page
| 6
Can
desc
ribe
how
he/
she
coor
dina
tes w
ith M
PA/N
stak
ehol
ders
and
oth
er a
genc
ies
for t
he m
anag
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
and
cite
exa
mpl
es o
f his/
her i
nter
actio
ns w
ith
them
. Pos
sible
reas
ons f
or e
ngag
emen
t can
be:
•
Seek
supp
ort (
fund
ing,
tech
nica
l ass
istan
ce, e
tc.)
•
Deve
lopi
ng th
e M
&E
plan
•
Prod
uctio
n of
IEC
mat
eria
ls •
Enco
urag
e pa
rtici
patio
n an
d su
ppor
t for
MPA
/N
• Jo
int e
nfor
cem
ent
C4-S
9. P
eopl
e sk
ills
Desc
ribe
your
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
with
1)
mem
bers
of t
he m
anag
emen
t bod
y an
d 2)
st
akeh
olde
rs.
How
do
you
hand
le d
isagr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
or M
PA/N
m
anag
emen
t bod
y?
Can
desc
ribe
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
(whe
ther
pos
itive
, clo
se a
nd e
ffect
ive)
with
m
embe
rs o
f man
agem
ent b
ody
as w
ell a
s sta
keho
lder
s Ha
s str
ateg
ies t
o re
solv
e co
nflic
ts a
nd d
isagr
eem
ents
am
ong
mem
bers
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y –
whi
ch m
ay b
e do
ne th
roug
h fo
rmal
and
info
rmal
m
eetin
gs a
nd co
mm
unica
tions
and
can
cite
inst
ance
s whe
n th
ese
happ
ened
2=ca
n de
scrib
e w
orki
ng
rela
tions
hips
1=
know
s onl
y 1
0=N o
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f has
stra
tegy
on
how
to
hand
le co
nflic
ts a
nd
disa
gree
men
ts)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
C4-S
10. A
ble
to
influ
ence
Ho
w d
o yo
u in
fluen
ce o
ther
s to
part
icipa
te in
th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n?
Can
men
tion
way
s to
enha
nce
supp
ort a
nd p
artic
ipat
ion
in th
e M
PA/N
m
anag
emen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n su
ch a
s: •
Shar
ing
the
impo
rtan
ce a
nd b
enef
its o
f the
MPA
/N
• Sh
arin
g th
e re
sults
of t
he p
rote
ctin
g th
e M
PA/N
as s
how
n fro
m th
e M
&E
• An
ecdo
tes t
hat s
how
prid
e/ow
ners
hip
of th
e M
PA/N
, inc
reas
ed p
artic
ipat
ion,
et
c.
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l way
s 1=
can
men
tion
at le
ast 1
0=
No
answ
er
FUNC
TION
: ENF
ORCE
MEN
T 5.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
crea
tion
and
adop
tion
of p
olici
es, s
trat
egie
s, la
ws a
nd re
gula
tions
to p
reve
nt M
PA/N
-rela
ted
viol
atio
ns
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
E5-K
10. L
aws a
nd
regu
latio
ns re
late
d to
M
PA/N
s
Wha
t per
tinen
t nat
iona
l law
s, lo
cal
ordi
nanc
es a
nd o
ther
issu
ance
s rel
ated
to
MPA
/Ns t
hat y
ou k
now
of?
W
hat a
re th
e pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
ac
tiviti
es in
you
r MPA
/N?
He m
ay g
ive
the
spec
ific o
rdin
ance
s ena
cted
for t
he M
PA/N
in th
e ar
ea, o
r the
law
th
at w
as p
asse
d sp
ecifi
c for
the
NIPA
S as
wel
l as t
he W
ildlif
e Ac
t, am
ende
d Fi
sher
ies L
aw, R
A 11
038
(ENI
PAS
Law
), an
d ot
her l
ocal
/mun
icipa
l/pro
vinc
ial
ordi
nanc
es th
at h
ave
been
pas
sed
whi
ch a
re re
late
d to
the
MPA
/N.
Can
men
tion
activ
ities
that
are
pro
hibi
ted
(e.g
. fish
ing
insid
e th
e pr
ohib
ited
zone
or
NO T
AKE
ZONE
; in
trusio
n in
to th
e re
gula
ted
zone
; fish
ing
usin
g un
auth
orize
d ge
ar,
dyna
mite
or p
oiso
n an
d no
xious
subs
tanc
es; b
uild
ing
Illeg
al st
ruct
ures
; pol
lutio
n;
colle
ctio
n of
mar
ine
orga
nism
s; du
mpi
ng o
f gar
bage
; col
lect
ion
of sa
mpl
es o
r m
arin
e or
gani
sms f
or sa
le; h
untin
g or
capt
ure
of e
ndan
gere
d m
arin
e or
gani
sms;
tour
ism a
ctiv
ities
in p
rohi
bite
d zo
nes,
and
man
y ot
hers
) and
allo
wed
(e.g
. re
crea
tiona
l div
ing
in d
esig
nate
d zo
ne, r
esea
rch,
nav
igat
ion,
etc
.) in
the
MPA
/N
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l law
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if a
ble
to m
entio
n pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
act
iviti
es)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
Page
| 7
E5
-K11
. Bro
ader
en
forc
emen
t pla
nnin
g
Is th
ere
an e
nfor
cem
ent p
lan
for t
he w
hole
m
unici
pal/
bay-
wid
e w
ater
s? If
yes
, ple
ase
desc
ribe
brie
fly.
Is th
e en
forc
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
in
corp
orat
ed in
it?
Know
ledg
eabl
e ab
out t
he e
nfor
cem
ent a
ctiv
ities
not
onl
y fo
r the
MPA
/N b
ut a
lso
on th
e ba
y-w
ide
or la
rger
scal
e Kn
ows w
heth
er e
nfor
cem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N is
inco
rpor
ated
in th
e br
oade
r en
forc
emen
t pla
n of
the
bay
or re
gion
2=kn
ows d
etai
led
plan
1=
know
s a li
ttle
abou
t pla
n 0=
No a
nsw
er
E5-K
12. C
halle
nges
to
enfo
rcem
ent
Wha
t are
the
chal
leng
es a
nd b
arrie
rs in
en
forc
emen
t?
How
do
you
addr
ess/
reso
lve
them
?
Can
cite
spec
ific c
halle
nges
in a
rea
and
disc
uss h
ow th
ese
wer
e ad
dres
sed
or
reso
lved
Ch
alle
nges
and
bar
riers
in e
nfor
cem
ent:
• So
ciocu
ltura
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Exis
ting
cust
omar
y la
ws/
loca
l rul
es a
nd
regu
latio
ns; T
radi
tiona
l die
ts (c
onsu
mpt
ion
of p
rote
cted
thre
aten
ed sp
ecie
s);
Polit
ical i
nter
vent
ion
• Po
litica
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Par
ty a
ffilia
tion;
Pat
rona
ge; W
ards
and
vot
ers
• Ec
onom
ic ba
rrie
rs in
the
area
– Li
velih
ood;
Bus
ines
s int
eres
ts; F
iscal
lim
itatio
ns
• Te
chni
cal b
arrie
rs in
the
area
– Ju
risdi
ctio
ns; I
mpo
undm
ent;
Evid
ence
(spe
cies
exam
inat
ion)
; Det
entio
n •
Tech
nolo
gica
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Equ
ipm
ent a
nd in
frast
ruct
ures
; Glo
bal
Posit
ioni
ng S
yste
m; P
atro
l boa
ts
• In
stitu
tiona
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Tur
fing;
Com
petit
ions
; Pro
ximity
; Lac
k of
ca
pacit
y; F
iscal
prio
ritie
s St
rate
gies
to a
ddre
ss/ r
esol
ve ch
alle
nges
can
inclu
de:
• Ca
pacit
y de
velo
pmen
t •
Com
mun
ity co
nsul
tatio
ns a
nd p
artic
ipat
ion
• Sh
ared
enf
orce
men
t •
Acqu
isitio
n of
equ
ipm
ent/
mat
eria
ls
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l 1=
can
cite
one
(p
lus “
1”, i
f sol
utio
n pr
ovid
ed)
0=No
ans
wer
(M
ax=3
poi
nts)
E5-K
13. I
nitia
tives
to
addr
ess M
PA/N
-rela
ted
viol
atio
ns
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
activ
ities
cond
ucte
d ag
ains
t MPA
/N-re
late
d vi
olat
ions
in y
our
area
?
Form
al a
nd sh
ared
agr
eem
ents
: Mem
oran
dum
of A
gree
men
ts (M
OAs)
; M
emor
andu
m o
f Und
erst
andi
ng (M
OU)
; Joi
nt A
gree
men
ts, e
tc.
In
stitu
tiona
l col
labo
ratio
n: Jo
int e
nfor
cem
ents
; Sha
ring
of re
sour
ces (
e.g.
pat
rol
boat
s, ra
dio,
etc
.); S
harin
g of
exp
ertis
e (e
.g. t
rain
ing,
reso
urce
spea
kers
, etc
.)
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l 1=
can
cite
one
0=no
ne
E5-K
14. B
est p
ract
ices
in im
prov
ing
law
en
forc
emen
t, co
mpl
ianc
e an
d se
curit
y in
and
aro
und
the
MPA
/N
Wha
t are
you
r bes
t pra
ctice
s in
MPA
en
forc
emen
t and
pro
tect
ing
your
mun
icipa
l w
ater
s?
Are
ther
e en
forc
emen
t pra
ctice
s in
othe
r ar
eas t
hat y
ou h
ave
hear
d ab
out a
nd/o
r re
plica
ted?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Best
pra
ctice
s in
MPA
enf
orce
men
t: Jo
int e
nfor
cem
ent;
Harm
onize
enf
orce
men
t la
ws a
nd re
gula
tions
; Par
ticip
ator
y la
w e
nfor
cem
ent;
Socia
l mar
ketin
g; In
form
atio
n di
ssem
inat
ion
Som
e ap
proa
ches
in e
nfor
cem
ent:
•
Soft
Appr
oach
– P
reve
ntio
n; S
ocia
l Mar
ketin
g; S
ocia
l Mob
iliza
tion;
Legi
slatio
n an
d re
gula
tion;
Info
rmat
ion
diss
emin
atio
n; C
ontin
uous
mon
itorin
g •
Hard
App
roac
h –
Pres
ence
of l
aw e
nfor
cers
; San
ctio
ns im
pose
d; D
etec
tion,
ap
preh
ensio
n, a
nd p
rose
cutio
n ac
tiviti
es; N
egat
ing
econ
omic
bene
fits f
rom
ill
egal
act
iviti
es
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l bes
t pra
ctice
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s of o
ther
are
a pr
actic
es)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
Page
| 8
E5
-K15
. Rol
es,
resp
onsib
ilitie
s and
rig
hts o
f the
var
ious
gr
oups
(sta
keho
lder
s, la
w e
nfor
cem
ent
agen
cies a
nd th
e ju
dicia
ry)
Wha
t are
the
man
date
s of n
atio
nal a
genc
ies
in re
latio
n to
MPA
/N?
Has a
n ag
reem
ent b
een
form
ed w
ith th
ese
diffe
rent
gro
ups?
Cite
exa
mpl
e/s.
Know
s the
man
date
s of P
NP, B
FAR,
DEN
R, P
CG, P
N an
d LG
Us:
• PN
P –
enfo
rce
all l
aws a
nd o
rdin
ance
s rel
ativ
e to
the
prot
ectio
n of
live
s and
pr
oper
ties;
mai
ntai
n pe
ace
and
orde
r and
pub
lic sa
fety
; inv
estig
ate
and
prev
ent c
rimes
; effe
ct th
e ar
rest
of c
rimin
al o
ffend
ers a
nd a
ssist
in th
eir
pros
ecut
ion;
exe
rcise
the
gene
ral p
ower
s to
mak
e ar
rest
, sea
rch
and
seizu
re
deta
in a
n ar
rest
ed p
erso
n fo
r a p
erio
d no
t bey
ond
wha
t is p
resc
ribed
by
law
. Th
e PN
P M
ariti
me
Grou
p, is
a n
atio
nal s
uppo
rt u
nit o
f the
PNP
that
is
man
date
d to
enf
orce
all
law
s with
in P
hilip
pine
terr
itoria
l wat
ers.
• BF
AR –
enf
orce
all
law
s, fo
rmul
ate
and
enfo
rce
all r
ules
and
regu
latio
ns
gove
rnin
g th
e co
nser
vatio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of f
isher
y re
sour
ces,
exce
pt in
m
unici
pal w
ater
s •
DENR
– e
nfor
ce e
nviro
nmen
tal p
rote
ctio
n la
ws.
• PC
G –
assis
t in
the
enfo
rcem
ent o
f law
s on
fishe
ries,
fore
stry
and
oth
er
appl
icabl
e la
ws w
ithin
the
mar
itim
e ju
risdi
ctio
n of
the
Phili
ppin
es; b
oard
and
in
spec
t all
type
s of m
erch
ant s
hips
and
wat
ercr
afts
in th
e pe
rform
ance
of t
his
func
tion;
enf
orce
law
s for
the
prot
ectio
n of
mar
ine
envi
ronm
ent a
nd
reso
urce
s fro
m o
ffsho
re so
urce
s or p
ollu
tion
with
in th
e m
ariti
me
juris
dict
ion
of th
e Ph
ilipp
ines
•
PN –
the
Phili
ppin
e Na
vy h
as a
man
date
to e
nfor
ce fi
sher
y la
ws
• LG
U –
enfo
rce
fishe
ry la
ws w
ithin
thei
r mun
icipa
l wat
ers;
prot
ect m
angr
oves
; co
ntro
l, re
view
and
enf
orce
fore
stry
law
s in
com
mun
ity-b
ased
pro
ject
s Fo
rmal
agr
eem
ents
(MOA
, MOU
, etc
.) fo
r joi
nt e
nfor
cem
ent a
nd o
ther
co
llabo
ratio
ns si
gned
bet
wee
n/am
ong
part
ies c
once
rned
3=kn
ows m
anda
tes o
f man
y or
gani
zatio
ns
2=kn
ows a
t lea
st 2
1=
know
s at l
east
1
0=No
ans
wer
( p
lus “
1”, i
f kno
ws o
f act
ual
agre
emen
t) (M
ax=4
poi
nts)
E5-S
11. E
nfor
cem
ent
stra
tegi
es
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at e
nfor
cem
ent
activ
ities
are
bei
ng e
ffect
ivel
y do
ne?
Us
e of
enf
orce
men
t cha
in –
det
ectio
n, a
ppre
hens
ion,
filin
g of
case
, jud
gem
ent,
etc.
Co
nduc
ts e
nfor
cem
ent u
sing
vario
us st
rate
gies
: •
Prev
entiv
e m
echa
nism
s usin
g bi
llboa
rds &
sign
age;
buo
ys; d
ialo
gues
and
IECs
; de
puta
tion/
trai
ning
of e
nfor
cers
•
Dete
ctio
n th
roug
h in
stal
latio
n of
gua
rdho
use,
use
of e
quip
men
t (bi
nocu
lars
, sp
otlig
hts,
rada
rs) a
nd sa
telli
te se
rvic
es
• Re
port
ing
mec
hani
sm u
sing
hotli
ne n
umbe
r and
mob
ile p
hone
s for
enf
orce
rs
• Re
cord
ing
mec
hani
sm –
Kee
p re
cord
s and
logs
of a
ctiv
ities
; Rep
orts
of
viol
atio
ns
• Re
spon
ding
mec
hani
sms b
y em
pow
erm
ent o
f loc
als t
o pa
rtici
pate
; pr
ocur
emen
t of p
atro
l ves
sels;
regu
lar t
rain
ing
and
refre
sher
cour
ses f
or
enfo
rcer
s; al
loca
ting
budg
et fo
r ope
ratio
ns
• Di
spos
al m
echa
nism
s – e
nsur
ing
viol
ator
s are
pun
ished
by
esta
blish
men
t of a
lo
cal a
djud
icatio
n bo
ard;
pro
secu
tion;
ava
ilabi
lity
of im
poun
ding
are
a fo
r co
nfisc
ated
equ
ipm
ent a
nd g
ear;
prot
ectio
n of
cust
ody
chai
n
2=kn
ows s
ever
al
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
E5-S
12. M
akes
corr
ect
judg
emen
t cal
ls Ho
w d
o yo
u de
cide
prob
lem
atic
case
s re
late
d to
enf
orce
men
t? W
hat b
ases
do
you
use?
Des
crib
e an
exa
mpl
e.
Can
cite
an e
xam
ple
of p
robl
emat
ic ca
ses t
hat e
xhib
ited
good
judg
men
t cal
l To
dec
ide
prob
lem
atic
case
s/vi
olat
ions
he/
she
may
refe
r to
exist
ing
law
s and
re
gula
tions
(Fish
erie
s Cod
e &
Wild
life
Act;
ordi
nanc
es; e
xecu
tive
orde
rs;
2=ca
n pr
ovid
e se
vera
l exa
mpl
es o
f go
od ju
dgem
ent c
alls
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 9
reso
lutio
ns; a
nd a
dmin
istra
tive
orde
rs);
cons
ult e
nfor
cem
ent t
eam
or o
ther
en
forc
emen
t age
ncie
s
FUNC
TION
: MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
6. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
an
effe
ctiv
e m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n (M
&E)
pro
gram
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g M
6-K1
6. M
PA/N
etw
ork
obje
ctiv
es a
nd b
enef
its
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
MPA
/N?
W
hat i
ndica
tor/
s nee
d to
be
mon
itore
d to
de
term
ine
if th
ese
obje
ctiv
es a
re b
eing
met
?
Know
s the
obj
ectiv
es &
indi
cato
rs o
f the
MPA
/N w
hich
can
inclu
de:
• Sus
tain
able
fish
erie
s – in
crea
sed
fish
stoc
k (b
iom
ass,
abun
danc
e); i
ncre
ased
fis
h ca
tch
(CPU
E); i
ncre
ased
/mai
ntai
ned
larv
al su
pply
/rec
ruitm
ent;
abse
nce/
decr
ease
of i
llega
l/des
truct
ive
fishi
ng p
ract
ices
• Bio
dive
rsity
cons
erva
tion
– pr
otec
tion
of cr
itica
l hab
itats
; mai
ntai
ned
ecol
ogica
l con
nect
ivity
; im
prov
ed st
atus
of t
hrea
tene
d sp
ecie
s; im
prov
ed
popu
latio
n siz
e • C
limat
e ch
ange
ada
ptat
ion
– pr
otec
tion
of re
silie
nt a
reas
; pro
tect
ion
of
criti
cal h
abita
ts; p
rote
ctio
n sim
ilar h
abita
ts a
long
env
ironm
enta
l gra
dien
t; re
duce
d th
reat
s; en
hanc
e ec
olog
ical c
onne
ctiv
ity
• Int
er-L
GU a
llian
ce –
Mem
oran
dum
of A
gree
men
ts; h
arm
onize
d CR
M re
late
d or
dina
nces
; joi
nt e
nfor
cem
ent
• Eco
tour
ism –
equ
itabl
e be
nefit
s; in
crea
sed
inco
me
• Pro
tect
ion
of th
reat
ened
spec
ies –
impr
oved
stat
us o
f thr
eate
ned
spec
ies;
impr
oved
pop
ulat
ion
size
• Soc
ial n
etw
ork
– in
crea
sed
colla
bora
tions
; sha
ring
of e
xper
tise
and
reso
urce
s; ex
chan
ge o
f kno
wle
dge
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l obj
ectiv
es
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1 o
bjec
tive
0= N
o an
swer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f kno
ws i
ndica
tors
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
M6-
K17.
MPA
/N
Mon
itorin
g &
Eva
luat
ion
(M&
E) p
rogr
am
Wha
t is m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n an
d w
hy
is it
impo
rtan
t?
Does
you
r MPA
/N h
ave
a M
&E
prog
ram
? If
yes,
wha
t was
you
r inv
olve
men
t in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
Can
expl
ain
wha
t is b
eing
mon
itore
d an
d ev
alua
ted
whi
ch m
ay in
clude
the
stat
us
of m
anag
emen
t effe
ctiv
enes
s; co
mpe
tenc
e/ca
pacit
y of
the
man
agem
ent b
ody;
st
atus
of c
oast
al a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces;
as w
ell a
s soc
ioec
onom
ic fa
ctor
s M
&E
is do
ne fo
r the
follo
win
g re
ason
s: •
To d
eter
min
e ef
fect
iven
ess o
f act
iviti
es in
ach
ievi
ng g
oals
and
obje
ctiv
es
• Fo
r dec
ision
mak
ing
and
plan
ning
of a
ctiv
ity
• Ca
n be
use
d as
bas
is fo
r tra
inin
gs/w
orks
hops
Ca
n di
scus
s lev
el o
f inv
olve
men
t, if
any,
on
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M&
E pr
ogra
m
2=ve
ry k
now
ledg
eabl
e (s
ever
al
item
s / re
ason
s not
ed)
1=m
entio
ns a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
M6-
K18.
Ada
ptiv
e m
anag
emen
t con
cept
s an
d im
port
ance
of
feed
back
Adap
tive
man
agem
ent i
nvol
ves t
he u
se o
f re
sults
from
M&
E to
mak
e ad
just
men
ts o
n th
e op
erat
iona
l im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
. Can
you
cite
an
inst
ance
whe
re
adap
tive
man
agem
ent w
as p
ract
iced
in y
our
area
(e.g
. on
CRM
or M
PA p
rogr
ams)
?
Fam
iliar
with
the
conc
epts
of a
dapt
ive
man
agem
ent a
nd ca
n cit
e an
exa
mpl
e of
ho
w it
was
pra
ctice
d (e
.g. a
djus
tmen
t of a
ctiv
ities
/inte
rven
tions
dep
endi
ng o
n cu
rren
t situ
atio
n an
d on
M&
E re
sults
)
M&
E re
sults
can
be u
sed
for l
earn
ing;
for d
ecisi
on m
akin
g an
d pl
anni
ng fo
r ad
ditio
nal a
ctiv
ities
and
impr
ovem
ent o
f int
erve
ntio
ns; t
o en
cour
age
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
stak
ehol
ders
to b
ette
r per
form
thei
r dut
ies;
and
as b
asis
for i
ncen
tive/
disi
ncen
tive
syst
em.
2=kn
ows a
dapt
ive
man
agem
ent
wel
l and
can
cite
exam
ples
1=
know
s som
e 0=
No
answ
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s fee
dbac
king
m
echa
nism
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
Page
| 1
0
Wha
t are
the
poss
ible
feed
back
ing
mec
hani
sms f
or th
e M
PA/N
and
how
re
gula
rly is
it d
one?
Can
enum
erat
e w
ays o
f giv
ing/
getti
ng fe
edba
ck o
n th
e M
PA/N
and
kno
ws t
he
impo
rtan
ce o
f fee
dbac
k fe
edba
ckin
g M
&E
resu
lts to
cons
titue
nts/
part
ners
M6-
K19.
Rol
es a
nd
expe
rtise
of d
iffer
ent
grou
ps (e
.g. a
genc
ies,
inst
itute
s etc
.)
Wha
t are
the
diffe
rent
age
ncie
s/gr
oups
who
pa
rtici
pate
in th
e M
&E
and
wha
t ex
pert
ise/h
elp
do th
ey co
ntrib
ute?
Know
s whi
ch a
genc
ies/
grou
ps ca
n pa
rtici
pate
in M
PA/N
M&
E –
LGU,
PGU
, DEN
R,
BFAR
, DIL
G, D
OST,
NGO
s, PO
s, Un
ivers
ities
/Sta
te C
olle
ges,
Rese
arch
Inst
itute
s, et
c.
Thes
e ag
encie
s may
cont
ribut
e m
any
way
s: •
Tech
nica
l ass
istan
ce –
cond
uct b
asel
ine
asse
ssm
ent a
nd m
onito
ring,
re
sour
ce p
erso
ns fo
r tra
inin
gs a
nd w
orks
hops
•
Fina
ncia
l ass
istan
ce
• Jo
int e
ffort
s – u
se o
f equ
ipm
ent,
train
ing
hall,
etc
.
2=ca
n na
me
seve
ral a
genc
ies
1=ca
n na
me
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s wha
t the
ir co
ntrib
utio
ns)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
7. C
ompe
tenc
y: S
uppo
rt p
erfo
rman
ce-b
ased
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
M
7-K2
0. B
est
MPA
/Net
wor
k m
anag
emen
t pra
ctice
s on
ince
ntiv
e/
disin
cent
ive
syst
ems
Plea
se ci
te b
est p
ract
ices o
n pe
rform
ance
-ba
sed
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
rela
ted
to M
PA/N
man
agem
ent.
Are
you
adop
ting
thes
e pr
actic
es in
you
r are
a?
Wha
t are
the
crite
ria/b
ases
for t
he
perfo
rman
ce e
valu
atio
n?
Can
desc
ribe
diffe
rent
per
form
ance
-bas
ed in
cent
ive/
disin
cent
ive
syst
ems f
or
MPA
/Ns i
mpl
emen
ted
in th
e ar
ea.
Reco
gniti
on a
nd a
war
ds g
iven
for B
est M
anag
ed M
PAs,
Best
MPA
Net
wor
k, B
est
NIPA
S, O
utst
andi
ng M
PA p
erso
nnel
, Ban
tay
Daga
t, Pr
otec
ted
Area
Ran
ger o
r W
ildlif
e En
forc
emen
t Offi
cer
Crite
ria fo
r thi
s can
be
the
MEA
T or
NEA
T sc
ores
, eva
luat
ion
and
valid
atio
n an
d fo
r ind
ivid
uals
this
may
be
perfe
ct a
tten
danc
e in
all
mee
tings
/ act
iviti
es, d
ilige
nce
and
activ
e pa
rtici
patio
n, e
tc.
2=ca
n de
scrib
e se
vera
l 1=
can
desc
ribe
at le
ast 1
0=
No
answ
er
M7-
S13.
Mak
es co
rrec
t ju
dgem
ent c
alls
How
do
you
rew
ard/
puni
sh m
embe
rs o
f the
M
PA m
anag
emen
t bod
y? C
ite in
stan
ces
whe
n th
ese
wer
e gi
ven.
Can
desc
ribe
a sy
stem
whi
ch h
as cl
ear b
asis
for m
akin
g ju
dgm
ent o
r dec
ision
s to
rew
ard/
puni
sh M
PA p
erso
nnel
(per
fect
atte
ndan
ce in
all
activ
ities
and
mee
tings
, ac
tive
part
icipa
tion,
dili
genc
e, e
tc.)
and
cite
exam
ple
of w
hen
they
wer
e gi
ven
2=ca
n gi
ve se
vera
l exa
mpl
es
1=ca
n gi
ve a
t lea
st 1
exa
mpl
e 0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 1
1
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (SC
ORE)
No
t at
all
(0)
Som
e-tim
es
(1)
Mos
t of
the
time
(2)
Al
l the
tim
e (3
)
1.
I am
a cr
itica
l thi
nker
.
2.
I am
ope
n to
sugg
estio
ns a
nd co
ntrib
utio
ns o
f ide
as fr
om o
ther
s.
3.
I a
m h
ones
t in
all m
y de
alin
gs.
4.
I a
m a
ppro
acha
ble
and
appr
ecia
te in
quiri
es fr
om o
ther
s.
5.
I a
m w
illin
g to
lear
n ne
w id
eas a
nd sk
ills.
6.
I enc
oura
ge th
e pa
rtici
patio
n, co
oper
atio
n an
d co
llabo
ratio
n of
all
stak
ehol
ders
in th
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
.
7.
I am
dili
gent
and
har
dwor
king
to a
ccom
plish
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f our
MPA
/N.
8.
I s
triv
e to
per
form
my
dutie
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s to
the
best
of m
y ab
ilitie
s and
with
out a
ny v
este
d in
tere
st.
9.
I h
ave
a vi
sion
for o
ur p
rote
cted
are
a an
d ha
ve id
eas a
nd p
lans
on
how
to h
elp
achi
eve
it.
10
. I h
elp
crea
te/r
ecom
men
d la
ws a
nd p
olici
es fo
r the
goo
d of
all
and
not f
or m
y ow
n pe
rson
al in
tere
st.
11
. I a
dher
e to
the
prin
ciple
s of g
ood
gove
rnan
ce, i
.e. t
rans
pare
ncy,
acc
ount
abili
ty a
nd p
artic
ipat
ory,
in th
e
deve
lopm
ent a
nd im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan.
12
. I su
ppor
t the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N M
anag
emen
t Pla
n.
13
. I a
llot a
nd p
rovi
de fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt to
the
MPA
/N.
14
. I a
m p
ublic
serv
ice-o
rient
ed a
nd d
edica
ted
in ra
ising
aw
aren
ess o
n M
PA/N
man
agem
ent a
nd p
rom
otin
g m
arin
e
cons
erva
tion.
15
. I st
rictly
enf
orce
and
/or f
ollo
w th
e la
w.
16
. I a
m fa
ir an
d ca
n m
ake
decis
ions
and
judg
men
ts w
ithou
t bia
s, ba
sed
on fa
cts a
nd a
ccor
ding
to th
e ru
le o
f law
.
17. I
mak
e de
cisio
ns a
nd a
ctio
ns b
ased
on
resu
lts a
nd re
com
men
datio
ns.
18
. I re
cogn
ize e
ffort
s and
giv
e cr
edit
to p
eopl
e.
19
. I a
m a
dapt
ive
and
capa
ble
of m
akin
g ap
prop
riate
chan
ges a
s nee
ded,
bas
ed o
n co
rrec
t inf
orm
atio
n.
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 109
GUIDE TO ADMINISTERING THE TOOL AND SCORING
Personnel Category B
Page
| 1
PE
RSON
NEL C
ATEG
ORY
B
Guid
e to
Adm
inist
erin
g the
Too
l & S
corin
g
PLAN
NING
1.
Com
pete
ncy:
Dire
ct th
e de
velo
pmen
t, re
view
and
upd
atin
g of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g P1
-K1.
Sta
te a
nd
impo
rtan
ce o
f coa
stal
an
d m
arin
e re
sour
ces
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces i
n yo
ur
area
?
Wha
t is t
he im
port
ance
of m
anag
ing
thes
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces?
Desc
ribe
the
stat
e of
coas
tal a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
seag
rass
/ man
grov
e/ co
ral
reef
s/ fi
sher
ies e
tc.)
of th
e ar
ea:
• W
here
are
they
loca
ted?
•
Can
you
estim
ate
thei
r size
(hec
tare
s), c
over
(per
cent
, lus
h, th
ick, e
tc.)
and
cond
ition
(poo
r, go
od, e
xcel
lent
)?
• Ho
w a
bout
the
fish
catc
h of
fish
erm
en –
wha
t is t
he a
vera
ge fi
sh ca
tch?
Kn
ows i
mpo
rtan
ce o
f mar
ine
reso
urce
s suc
h as
: •
Prov
ision
ing
– so
urce
of f
ood
(fish
, she
llfish
, sea
wee
d, ti
mbe
r, dr
ugs,
etc.
) •
Regu
latin
g –
coas
tal p
rote
ctio
n, p
reve
ntio
n of
ero
sion,
wat
er p
urifi
catio
n,
carb
on st
orag
e •
Cultu
ral,
spiri
tual
, bea
uty
2=ca
n de
scrib
e st
atus
of r
esou
rces
1=
can
desc
ribe
at le
ast 1
(p
lus "
1", i
f kno
ws i
mpo
rtan
ce)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
P1-K
2. M
PA/N
etw
ork
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t was
you
r rol
e in
the
deve
lopm
ent
proc
ess o
f you
r MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
cont
ents
of t
he
man
agem
ent p
lan?
W
hy is
it im
port
ant t
o ha
ve a
pla
n?
Invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of M
PA/N
man
agem
ent:
•
High
ly in
volv
ed (a
nd ca
n de
scrib
e pr
oces
s of d
evel
opm
ent)
• M
oder
atel
y in
volv
ed
• Lit
tle in
volv
emen
t (e.
g. si
gnin
g in
vitat
ion
lett
ers,
etc.
) •
No in
volv
emen
t at a
ll
Has a
n id
ea o
f the
gen
eral
cont
ents
of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
such
as:
•
Ratio
nale
and
pur
pose
of M
PA/N
or V
ision
, Miss
ion
and
Goal
setti
ng
• Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
mar
ine
reso
urce
s •
Lega
l fra
mew
ork
• Or
gani
zatio
nal s
truct
ure
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Stra
tegi
c act
ion
plan
s (fo
r M&
E, E
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
) •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Pena
lties
and
fine
s •
Othe
r ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
2=Hi
ghly
invo
lved
1=
mod
erat
ely
invo
lved
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s con
tent
s of p
lan)
(M
ax=3
poi
nts)
P1-K
3. A
sses
smen
t/
Iden
tifica
tion
of ri
sks/
th
reat
s to
the
MPA
/N
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s add
ress
ed b
y yo
ur M
PA/N
?
Wha
t are
the
impa
cts o
f the
se th
reat
s?
Know
s how
to co
nduc
t risk
/ thr
eat a
sses
smen
t and
can
desc
ribe
impa
cts o
f th
ese
thre
ats i
n th
e ar
ea
Know
s the
maj
or th
reat
s affe
ctin
g th
eir m
arin
e re
sour
ces,
such
as:
2=ca
n de
scrib
e m
any
thre
ats a
nd
thei
r im
pact
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 2
•
Over
-ext
ract
ion
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
may
spec
ify w
hich
reso
urce
s)
• Re
clam
atio
n or
conv
ersio
n of
cert
ain
part
s of t
he se
a fo
r oth
er u
ses (
e.g.
fis
h po
nds,
port
s, hu
man
settl
emen
t are
as)
• Ill
egal
fish
ing
prac
tices
: ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
• Se
dim
enta
tion
• Po
llutio
n
• In
adeq
uate
supp
ort (
e.g.
, exe
cutiv
e, le
gisla
tive,
per
sonn
el, f
unds
, etc
.) to
m
anag
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces p
rope
rly
• Ot
her t
hrea
ts: _
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
P1
-K4.
Inco
rpor
atio
n of
m
anag
emen
t pla
n to
br
oade
r man
agem
ent
plan
s
Does
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n co
ntrib
ute
to th
e br
oade
r man
agem
ent p
lans
of
you
r mun
icipa
lity/
pro
vinc
e? If
yes
, how
?
Know
s whe
ther
MPA
is p
art o
f ano
ther
pla
n su
ch a
s:
• Z
onin
g/ C
oast
al La
nd U
se a
nd W
ater
Pla
n •
Coa
stal
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Pla
n •
Mun
icipa
l Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n •
Pro
vinc
ial D
evel
opm
ent P
lan
• T
ouris
m P
lan
• O
ther
: ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
2=kn
ows d
etai
led
plan
1=
know
s a li
ttle
abou
t pla
n 0=
No a
nsw
er
P1-S
1. E
ffect
ive
facil
itatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
facil
itate
the
revi
ew a
nd
upda
ting
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
May
hav
e a
maj
or p
artic
ipat
ion
in th
e re
view
and
upd
atin
g of
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan:
•
Led
the
tech
nica
l wor
king
gro
up (T
WG)
that
dra
fted/
upda
ted
the
plan
•
Mem
ber o
f the
TW
G th
at d
rafte
d/up
date
d th
e pl
an
• At
tend
ed th
e w
orks
hop
and
part
icipa
ted
in th
e dr
aftin
g of
the
plan
Or
just
min
imal
par
ticip
atio
n su
ch a
s:
• As
signe
d a
staf
f to
cond
uct a
wor
ksho
p to
dra
ft/ u
pdat
e th
e M
PA/N
M
anag
emen
t Pla
n
• Co
ordi
nate
d an
d or
gani
zed
the
wor
ksho
p on
the
draf
ting/
upd
atin
g of
the
MPA
/N M
anag
emen
t Pla
n
2=pa
rtici
pate
d in
dra
fting
pla
n
1=m
inim
al p
artic
ipat
ion
0=No
par
ticip
atio
n
2. C
ompe
tenc
y: D
irect
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n an
d pr
ogra
ms
P2-K
5. Im
plem
entin
g th
e m
anag
emen
t pla
n W
hat a
re th
e M
PA/N
act
ion
plan
s tha
t are
be
ing
impl
emen
ted?
Ca
n yo
u m
entio
n so
me
activ
ities
in th
e pl
an
that
hav
e an
d ha
ve n
ot b
een
done
?
Has k
now
ledg
e of
the
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring
of th
e m
anag
emen
t pla
n (p
rogr
ams o
n M
&E,
Enf
orce
men
t, et
c.).
Ab
le to
des
crib
e so
me
of th
e ac
tiviti
es co
nduc
ted
such
as:
•
Mon
itorin
g of
cora
l ree
fs, s
eagr
ass,
man
grov
es a
nd fi
sh ca
tch
• IE
C ac
tiviti
es a
nd fe
edba
ckin
g of
mon
itorin
g re
sults
•
Pat
rolli
ng
• C
onst
ruct
ion
of g
uard
hous
e •
Acq
uisit
ion
of e
quip
men
t •
Est
ablis
hmen
t and
mai
nten
ance
of b
uoys
•
Reg
ular
mee
tings
•
Upd
atin
g of
MPA
/N P
lan
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 3
P2
-K6.
Man
agem
ent
stru
ctur
e an
d go
vern
ance
Wha
t are
the
role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s of
each
per
son
in th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent
stru
ctur
e? D
escr
ibe
som
e of
them
. W
hat a
re th
e sk
ills,
know
ledg
e an
d/or
tale
nts
requ
ired
for p
eopl
e in
volv
ed in
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent?
Can
nam
e va
rious
role
s suc
h as
: •
MPA
man
agem
ent b
oard
& it
s com
posit
ion/
mem
bers
•
MPA
trea
sure
r •
MPA
boo
kkee
per
• M
PA se
cret
ary
• M
PA m
anag
er
• C
omm
ittee
s and
thei
r hea
ds
• O
ther
___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_ Ca
n de
scrib
e th
e ta
sks a
nd re
spon
sibili
ties o
f the
se ro
les a
nd e
num
erat
e so
me
of th
e kn
owle
dge,
skill
s and
tale
nts n
eede
d fo
r one
to w
ork
in th
e m
anag
emen
t of
the
MPA
/N
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
P2-S
2. C
apac
ity n
eeds
as
sess
men
ts
How
do
you
asse
ss th
e ca
pacit
ies o
f the
M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
erso
nnel
? Do
you
cond
uct t
rain
ings
for t
he st
aff o
r en
sure
that
they
get
the
appr
opria
te
trai
ning
s in
orde
r to
impr
ove
thei
r ca
pacit
ies?
Nam
e tr
aini
ngs c
ondu
cted
.
Cond
ucts
trai
ning
nee
ds a
sses
smen
t and
obs
erva
nt o
f ski
lls a
nd ta
lent
s of s
taff
Cond
ucts
/ allo
ws s
taff
to a
ttend
capa
bilit
y en
hanc
emen
t act
iviti
es a
nd tr
aini
ngs
such
as:
• E
xpos
ure
visit
s to
succ
essf
ul M
PA/N
s •
Fin
ancia
l lite
racy
, acc
ount
ing
and
book
keep
ing
trai
ning
s •
Lead
ersh
ip tr
aini
ng
• V
alue
s for
mat
ion
trai
ning
•
Hab
itat a
sses
smen
t and
mon
itorin
g tra
inin
g •
Ree
f Che
ck a
nd d
ivin
g tra
inin
g •
Com
mun
icatio
ns tr
aini
ng
• Li
velih
ood
trai
ning
s
2=kn
ows o
r use
s sev
eral
stra
tegi
es
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
P2-K
7. D
ecisi
on-m
akin
g st
ruct
ures
and
pr
oces
ses a
ffect
ing
impl
emen
tatio
n
Desc
ribe
the
decis
ion-
mak
ing
proc
ess f
or
impl
emen
ting
and
mon
itorin
g M
PA/N
act
ion
plan
s/pr
ojec
ts.
Is th
ere
a cle
ar a
nd o
pera
tiona
l mec
hani
sm
for r
esol
ving
conf
licts
? If
yes,
desc
ribe
brie
fly.
Know
s way
s to
enab
le a
rriv
ing
at g
ood
decis
ions
: •
Gath
erin
g fa
cts a
nd in
form
atio
n be
fore
act
ing
• Co
nsid
erin
g se
vera
l act
ions
/ str
ateg
ies
• Di
scus
sing
plan
s, co
nsul
ts/ s
olici
ts h
elp
from
oth
ers
• Ha
ving
fore
sight
and
hin
dsig
ht
• Ti
mel
ines
s of a
ctio
n
2= ca
n de
scrib
e m
any
impo
rtan
t po
ints
1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No
answ
er
P2-S
3. Le
ader
ship
skill
s Ca
n yo
u cit
e in
stan
ces w
hen
you
had
to
mak
e de
cisio
ns a
bout
MPA
/N
impl
emen
tatio
n?
Wer
e yo
u ab
le to
mak
e yo
ur p
artn
ers a
nd
team
mem
bers
agr
ee w
ith y
our d
ecisi
on?
How
do
you
mot
ivat
e th
e M
PA/N
m
anag
emen
t bod
y an
d ot
her s
take
hold
ers t
o su
stai
n th
eir e
ffort
s for
the
MPA
/N?
Show
s lea
ders
hip
skill
s by:
•
Atte
ndin
g m
eetin
gs a
nd co
mm
unica
ting
regu
larly
with
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent b
ody
• Se
ekin
g up
date
s with
the
pers
on in
char
ge o
f the
MPA
/N’s
daily
op
erat
ions
•
Actin
g on
impo
rtan
t and
urg
ent m
atte
rs th
at w
ill h
elp
the
MPA
/N
• M
akin
g de
cisio
ns b
ased
on
fact
s and
in co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y an
d re
leva
nt st
akeh
olde
rs &
par
tner
s Ca
n cit
e ex
ampl
es o
f suc
h ac
tiviti
es a
nd in
itiat
ives
don
e.
2=cit
es m
any
lead
ersh
ip &
dec
ision
-m
akin
g in
itiat
ives
1=
few
lead
ersh
ip &
dec
ision
-mak
ing
initi
ativ
es
0=no
ne
( plu
s “1”
, if c
an ci
te
stra
tegi
es/e
xam
ples
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
Page
| 4
FINA
NCIN
G 3.
Com
pete
ncy:
Pre
pare
fina
ncin
g-re
late
d pl
ans f
or th
e M
PA/N
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g F3
-K8.
The
ory,
bes
t pr
actic
es a
nd st
rate
gies
fo
r dev
elop
ing
sust
aina
ble
finan
cial
and
busin
ess p
lans
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
su
stai
nabl
e fin
ancin
g th
at y
ou k
now
of?
W
hat f
inan
ce-re
late
d pl
an/s
hav
e yo
u pr
epar
ed (e
.g. e
.g. a
nnua
l fin
ancia
l pla
n,
busin
ess p
lan,
sust
aina
bilit
y pl
an)?
W
hat a
re so
me
of th
e co
nten
ts o
f the
se
plan
s?
Know
s bes
t pra
ctice
s in
sust
aina
ble
finan
cing.
Can
cite
exam
ple/
s.
Has e
xper
ienc
e in
pre
parin
g/de
velo
ping
a fi
nanc
ial p
lan
and
busin
ess p
lan
for t
he
MPA
/N
Know
s the
cont
ents
of a
fina
ncia
l or a
bus
ines
s pla
n:
• Bu
sines
s pla
n –
Cust
omer
bas
e; G
oods
and
serv
ices (
of th
e M
PA/N
); M
arke
ting
stra
tegy
(i.e
. des
crip
tion
of p
rodu
cts/
serv
ices,
mar
ket t
rend
s, pr
icing
etc
.); Im
plem
enta
tion
stra
tegy
(i.e
. ope
ratio
nal p
lans
and
stra
tegi
es)
• Fi
nanc
ial p
lan
– Pr
ojec
ted
activ
ities
; Fin
ancia
l req
uire
men
ts/b
udge
t nee
ds
(i.e.
am
ount
and
tim
ing
of fu
ndin
g); A
ppro
pria
te fu
ndin
g so
urce
s; Pr
ofit
and
loss
pro
ject
ions
In
shor
t – a
bus
ines
s pla
n lo
oks a
t how
to g
ain
mon
ey u
sing
the
good
s and
se
rvice
s of t
he M
PA/N
whi
le a
fina
ncia
l pla
n lo
oks a
t how
the
MPA
/N’’s
fina
ncia
l ne
eds w
ill b
e co
vere
d
2 =
Know
s bes
t pra
ctice
and
has
ex
perie
nce
in p
repa
ring
plan
1
= Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0
= No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f kno
ws c
onte
nts o
f fin
ancia
l/bus
ines
s pla
n)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
F3-K
9. F
amili
arity
with
bu
dget
cycle
and
obj
ect
of e
xpen
ditu
res
Wha
t are
the
finan
cial n
eeds
of y
our
MPA
/N?
Are
thes
e ite
ms i
nclu
ded
in th
e bu
dget
? Ar
e th
ere
fund
s to
suffi
cient
ly su
ppor
t the
se
need
s? E
xpla
in y
our a
nsw
er.
Desc
ribe
the
proc
ess o
f disb
ursin
g,
acco
untin
g an
d au
ditin
g fo
r MPA
/N re
late
d ex
pens
es.
Know
s the
obj
ect o
f exp
endi
ture
s – P
erso
nal s
ervi
ces,
Mai
nten
ance
& o
pera
ting
expe
nses
(e.g
. enf
orce
men
t to
inclu
de li
tigat
ion
proc
ess,
M&
E, IE
C, p
hysic
al
stru
ctur
e, e
tc.),
Cap
ital o
utla
y, F
inan
cial e
xpen
ses
Know
s the
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent s
yste
m a
nd th
e in
flow
& o
utflo
w o
f fun
ds fo
r th
e M
PA/N
(i.e
. Nat
iona
l Gov
ernm
ent A
ccou
ntin
g Sy
stem
) – B
udge
ting,
Ac
coun
ting,
Aud
iting
, Cas
h m
anag
emen
t, Re
venu
e ge
nera
tion
and
Repo
rtin
g
3 =
Very
kno
wle
dgea
ble
(kno
ws
finan
cial n
eeds
and
can
spec
ify
budg
et cy
cle &
obj
ect o
f ex
pend
iture
s)
2 =
Know
ledg
eabl
e (in
com
plet
e kn
owle
dge
on b
udge
t cyc
le &
obj
ect
of e
xpen
ditu
res)
1
= Kn
ows o
nly
1 as
pect
0
= No
ans
wer
F3-K
10. E
ffect
ive
polic
ies a
nd st
rate
gies
to
ens
ure
finan
cial a
nd
logi
stic
supp
ort t
o M
PA/N
s
Wha
t pol
icies
/str
ateg
ies s
houl
d be
in p
lace
to
ens
ure
that
fund
s are
pro
vide
d fo
r the
im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
?
Are
thes
e be
ing
impl
emen
ted
in y
our
MPA
/N?
If ye
s, cit
e w
hich
one
s.
Know
s the
pol
icies
that
shou
ld b
e in
pla
ce to
ens
ure
that
fund
s and
supp
ort a
re
prov
ided
fund
ing
to th
e M
PA/N
(i.e
. pro
vide
s dire
ct fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt, t
hrou
gh
ince
ntiv
es, f
ines
& p
enal
ties,
etc.
) •
Fish
erie
s Cod
e (R
.A. 1
0654
) •
For N
IPAS
– N
IPAS
Act
, Gen
eral
App
ropr
iatio
ns A
ct
• Ot
her r
even
ue-g
ener
atin
g po
licie
s ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
2= ca
n cit
e m
any
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
F3-S
4. P
repa
ratio
n of
fin
ance
-rela
ted
plan
s Ho
w d
o yo
u as
sess
/est
imat
e th
e fin
ancia
l ne
eds o
f the
MPA
/N?
M
ay h
ave
a m
ajor
par
ticip
atio
n in
the
prep
arat
ion
of M
PA/N
ann
ual f
inan
cial o
r bu
sines
s pla
n:
2 =
Part
icipa
ted
in d
rafti
ng p
lan
1
= M
inim
al p
artic
ipat
ion
Page
| 5
How
do
you
prep
are
the
plan
/s?
Desc
ribe
brie
fly.
• Le
d th
e te
chni
cal w
orki
ng g
roup
(TW
G) th
at p
repa
res t
he fi
nanc
ial o
r bu
sines
s pla
n •
Mem
ber o
f the
TW
G th
at p
repa
res t
he fi
nanc
ial o
r bus
ines
s pla
n •
Atte
nded
the
wor
ksho
p &
par
ticip
ated
in th
e dr
aftin
g of
the
finan
cial o
r bu
sines
s pla
n M
inim
al p
artic
ipat
ion
• As
signe
d a
staf
f to
cond
uct a
wor
ksho
p to
dra
ft th
e fin
ancia
l pla
n •
Coor
dina
ted
and
orga
nize
d th
e w
orks
hop
on th
e dr
aftin
g of
the
finan
cial
plan
0 =
No p
artic
ipat
ion
4. C
ompe
tenc
y: A
ble
to m
obili
ze su
stai
nabl
e fu
ndin
g and
reso
urce
s for
the
MPA
/N
F4-K
11. O
ptio
n fo
r so
urce
s of f
unds
and
re
sour
ces t
o su
ppor
t th
e M
PA/N
Wha
t are
the
poss
ible
sour
ces o
f fu
nds/
reso
urce
s to
supp
ort t
he p
rogr
ams
and
activ
ities
of t
he M
PA/N
? Ci
te a
genc
ies/
or
gani
zatio
ns th
at ca
n po
tent
ially
hel
p (e
.g.
fund
s, te
chni
cal,
equi
pmen
t, et
c.) t
o th
e M
PA/N
, inc
ludi
ng e
nfor
cem
ent a
nd M
&E.
W
hat i
s the
pro
cess
for a
cces
sing
thes
e fu
nds
and
reso
urce
s?
Can
you
desc
ribe
the
polic
ies a
nd/o
r re
quire
men
ts o
f the
se a
ssist
ing
agen
cies/
orga
niza
tions
(e.g
. MOA
/MOU
, et
c.)?
Can
cite
exte
rnal
(nat
iona
l age
ncie
s, ac
adem
e, p
rivat
e or
gani
zatio
ns a
nd N
GOs,
etc.
) and
inte
rnal
sour
ces o
f fun
ding
and
oth
er re
sour
ces;
and
disc
uss h
ow th
ese
can
be a
cces
sed
such
as:
•
Gran
ts a
nd D
onat
ions
▪
Bila
tera
l & m
ultil
ater
al d
onor
s (ac
tivity
-bas
ed te
chni
cal a
ssist
ance
, tr
aini
ng, e
quip
men
t or i
nfra
stru
ctur
e) –
Supp
ort f
rom
NGA
s e.g
. DEN
R,
BFAR
, DOL
E, T
ESDA
, etc
.; Aca
dem
e (S
choo
ls, C
olle
ges &
Uni
vers
ities
) ▪
Foun
datio
ns (e
.g. F
PE, C
CEF,
Mal
ampa
ya, e
tc.)
▪ Su
ppor
t fro
m N
GOs
▪ Su
ppor
t fro
m p
rivat
e se
ctor
/com
pani
es (i
.e. t
hrou
gh th
eir C
SR)
▪ Lo
cal/I
nter
natio
nal p
roje
ct fu
ndin
g ▪
Cons
erva
tion
Trus
t Fun
ds
• To
urism
Rev
enue
s (en
tran
ce fe
es, u
ser f
ees,
etc.
) •
Inte
grat
ed P
rote
cted
Are
a Fu
nd (I
PAF)
[For
NIP
AS]
3=ca
n cit
e m
any
2=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 2
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
F4-S
5. P
repa
ratio
n of
pr
ojec
t pro
posa
ls Do
you
pre
pare
pro
ject
pro
posa
ls? If
yes
, de
scrib
e br
iefly
. Ha
ve y
ou a
tten
ded
any
trai
ning
rela
ted
to
prop
osal
writ
ing?
If y
es, n
ame
the
trai
ning
/s.
Part
icipa
ted
in p
repa
ring
proj
ect p
ropo
sal/s
to fu
nd M
PA/N
•
Led
the
tech
nica
l wor
king
gro
up (T
WG)
that
pre
pare
s the
pro
ject
pro
posa
l/s
• M
embe
r of t
he T
WG
that
pre
pare
s the
pro
posa
l •
Assig
ned
a st
aff t
o co
nduc
t a w
orks
hop
to d
raft
the
prop
osal
•
Coor
dina
ted
and
orga
nize
d th
e w
orks
hop
on th
e dr
aftin
g of
the
proj
ect
prop
osal
•
Atte
nded
the
wor
ksho
p &
par
ticip
ated
in th
e dr
aftin
g of
the
proj
ect
prop
osal
De
scrip
tion
of p
ropo
sal _
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
Can
nam
e tra
inin
g/s a
ttend
ed o
n pr
opos
al w
ritin
g.
2=pa
rtici
pate
d in
dra
fting
the
prop
osal
1=
min
imal
par
ticip
atio
n
0=No
par
ticip
atio
n (p
lus “
1”, i
f can
des
crib
e pr
opos
al
subm
itted
/ app
rove
d/fu
nded
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
Page
| 6
F4
-S6.
Allo
cate
, mob
ilize
an
d ou
tsou
rce
fund
s an
d re
sour
ces f
or
MPA
/N
How
do
you
allo
cate
and
prio
ritize
fu
nds/
reso
urce
s for
the
MPA
/N?
How
do
you
help
gen
erat
e fu
nds/
reso
urce
s fo
r the
MPA
/N?
Able
to d
iscus
s in
deta
il ho
w fu
nds a
re a
lloca
ted,
mob
ilize
d an
d se
cure
d by
•
Prio
ritizi
ng n
eeds
bas
ed o
n co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith m
anag
emen
t bod
y •
Ensu
ring
that
gov
ernm
ent b
udge
t for
MPA
/N is
wel
l-bud
gete
d an
d in
tern
ally
-gen
erat
ed re
venu
es a
re u
sed
for t
he M
PA/N
•
Acqu
iring
fund
s and
reso
urce
s fro
m o
ther
org
aniza
tions
(e.g
. don
ors,
foun
datio
ns, N
GOs,
etc.
) •
Mak
ing
sure
that
fund
s are
acc
esse
d
• Ot
her s
trat
egie
s may
be
men
tione
d
3=ca
n sp
ecify
bud
get p
er p
rogr
am,
allo
catio
n an
d fu
nd so
urce
s 2=
inco
mpl
ete
1=
know
s onl
y 1
aspe
ct
0=No
ans
wer
5. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e fin
ancia
l man
agem
ent s
yste
m in
pla
ce
F5-K
12. S
tand
ards
, no
rms a
nd p
roce
dure
s fo
r fin
ancia
l m
anag
emen
t
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
fin
ancia
l man
agem
ent t
hat y
ou k
now
of?
W
hat i
s the
pre
scrib
ed fi
nanc
ial r
epor
ting
that
you
follo
w?
Can
cite
a be
st p
ract
ice in
MPA
/N fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t Kn
ows t
he fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
and
the
inflo
w &
out
flow
of f
unds
for
the
MPA
/N (i
.e. N
atio
nal G
over
nmen
t Acc
ount
ing
Syst
em) –
Bud
getin
g,
Acco
untin
g, A
uditi
ng, C
ash
man
agem
ent,
Reve
nue
gene
ratio
n, R
epor
ting
2=Kn
ows m
any
1=Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
F5-S
7. F
inan
cial
man
agem
ent s
kills
Ho
w d
o yo
u en
sure
that
pro
per f
inan
cial
man
agem
ent (
e.g.
pro
per b
udge
ting,
ac
coun
ting,
pro
cure
men
t, et
c.) i
s fol
low
ed?
Cite
som
e in
stan
ces.
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at fu
nds a
re sp
ent
wise
ly a
nd e
fficie
ntly
?
Know
s stra
tegi
es to
ens
ure
prop
er fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t and
effe
ctiv
ely
&
effic
ient
ly u
se fu
nds (
i.e. p
rope
r bud
getin
g, a
ccou
ntin
g, a
uditi
ng, p
rocu
rem
ent,
etc.
)
2=M
entio
ns se
vera
l str
ateg
ies
1=M
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0=
No a
nsw
er
F5-S
8. F
inan
cial
repo
rtin
g Ho
w d
o yo
u pr
epar
e yo
ur fi
nanc
ial r
epor
ts?
How
ofte
n?
How
do
you
pres
ent y
our f
inan
cial r
epor
ts?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Know
s how
to p
repa
re fi
nanc
ial r
epor
ts
Know
s how
to p
rese
nt fi
nanc
ial s
tatu
s and
repo
rts
Mak
es su
re th
at fi
nanc
ial r
epor
ts a
re su
bmitt
ed o
n tim
e
2=m
entio
ns se
vera
l str
ateg
ies
1=m
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0=
N o a
nsw
er
COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
6.
Com
pete
ncy:
Dire
ct th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
an
adap
tive
com
mun
icatio
ns p
lan
for t
he M
PA/N
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g C6
-K13
. MPA
/N
info
rmat
ion
that
nee
ds
to b
e co
mm
unica
ted
with
in a
nd o
utsid
e th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant
conc
epts
/info
rmat
ion
abou
t MPA
/Ns t
hat
the
peop
le/c
omm
unity
shou
ld k
now
abo
ut?
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut th
e M
PA/N
in y
our a
rea?
Can
cite
impo
rtan
t inf
orm
atio
n ab
out t
he M
PA/N
that
shou
ld b
e co
mm
unica
ted
to th
e co
mm
unity
whi
ch co
uld
inclu
de th
e fo
llow
ing:
•
MPA
/N o
bjec
tives
(e.g
. fish
erie
s man
agem
ent,
biod
ivers
ity co
nser
vatio
n,
habi
tat p
rote
ctio
n, e
tc.)
• M
PA/N
thre
ats (
e.g.
ove
rfish
ing,
sedi
men
tatio
n, p
ollu
tion,
etc
.) •
Diffe
rent
mar
ine
habi
tats
(cor
al re
ef, s
eagr
ass,
man
grov
e)
• Im
port
ance
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
e.g.
pro
visio
ning
, reg
ulat
ing,
etc
.)
2=kn
ows l
ots
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 7
•
Best
pra
ctice
s in
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t •
Law
s and
pol
icies
rela
ted
to co
asta
l and
mar
ine
envir
onm
ent a
nd re
sour
ces
• Ru
les &
regu
latio
ns; w
hat i
s allo
wed
and
pro
hibi
ted
in th
e M
PA/N
•
Com
mun
ity in
volv
emen
t in
the
MPA
/N
C6-K
14. C
omm
unica
tion
stra
tegi
es
Wha
t are
you
r com
mun
icatio
n st
rate
gies
? Gi
ve e
xam
ples
. Is
ther
e a
mec
hani
sm fo
r the
gen
eral
pub
lic
to b
e co
nsist
ently
, effe
ctiv
ely
and
pro-
activ
ely
info
rmed
abo
ut M
PA/N
pro
gram
s an
d ac
tiviti
es?
If ye
s, cit
e so
me
exam
ples
.
Vario
us co
mm
unica
tion
stra
tegi
es m
ay b
e gi
ven
such
as:
•
Adve
rtisi
ng (T
V, R
adio
, Pos
ters
) •
Pres
s Con
fere
nces
•
Trad
ition
al a
rts/
Com
mun
ity D
ialo
gue
• In
tern
et a
nd so
cial m
edia
•
SMS/
Mob
ile p
hone
•
Volu
ntee
r/ co
mm
unity
eve
nts
• M
erch
andi
se d
istrib
utio
n •
Spec
ial e
vent
s (to
wn
fest
ival
s, co
ntes
ts, f
un ru
ns)
• In
clusio
n in
scho
ol cu
rricu
lum
or t
hrou
gh IE
Cs a
nd o
ther
act
iviti
es co
nduc
ted
in sc
hool
or w
ith st
uden
ts
2=kn
ows l
ots
1=kn
ows 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
C6-K
15. O
ptio
ns o
n pr
ovid
ing
reso
urce
s for
th
e co
mm
unica
tions
pr
ogra
m
Wha
t are
the
sour
ces o
f fun
ds a
nd o
ther
re
sour
ces t
o su
ppor
t the
com
mun
icatio
n pr
ogra
m fo
r the
MPA
/N?
Cite
exa
mpl
es,
sour
ces,
etc.
Fina
ncia
l res
ourc
es fo
r the
MPA
/N’s
com
mun
icatio
n pr
ogra
m m
ay co
me
from
IP
AF (N
IPAS
), vo
lunt
ary
cont
ribut
ions
/ don
atio
ns, s
pons
orsh
ips,
budg
et
allo
catio
n, e
xter
nal p
roje
ct fu
ndin
g (N
GO),
exte
rnal
pro
ject
fund
ing
(Gov
ernm
ent),
ext
erna
l pro
ject
fund
ing
(priv
ate)
and
fund
-raisi
ng a
ctiv
ities
. Ot
her r
esou
rces
may
be
thro
ugh
hum
an se
rvice
s suc
h as
vol
unte
er in
divi
dual
s an
d or
gani
zatio
ns, o
r airt
ime
from
radi
o st
atio
ns, e
tc.
3=ca
n cit
e m
any
2=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 2
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
C6-S
9. E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
harn
ess s
uppo
rt fo
r the
MPA
/N?
If
ther
e ar
e pe
ople
who
do
not s
uppo
rt th
e M
PA/N
, how
do
you
deal
and
com
mun
icate
w
ith th
em?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Able
to h
arne
ss su
ppor
t for
the
MPA
/N th
roug
h th
e fo
llow
ing
way
s: •
Raisi
ng M
PA/N
conc
erns
in n
atio
nal,
regi
onal
and
loca
l mee
tings
and
ga
ther
ings
•
Prom
otin
g M
PA/N
by
supp
ortin
g in
stitu
tiona
l arr
ange
men
ts a
nd
part
ners
hips
with
oth
er m
unici
palit
ies,
prov
ince
s and
/or n
etw
orks
•
Com
mun
icatin
g w
ith fu
ndin
g gr
oups
and
age
ncie
s to
gath
er fi
nanc
ial
supp
ort
• He
adin
g fu
nd-ra
ising
act
iviti
es
• Im
mer
sing
with
the
loca
l com
mun
ity
Able
to d
eal w
ith n
on-s
uppo
rter
s of t
he M
PA/N
thro
ugh
the
follo
win
g:
• In
terp
erso
nal (
face
-to-fa
ce d
ialo
gues
and
disc
ussio
ns w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs)
• Pr
ovisi
on o
f edu
catio
n an
d pr
omot
iona
l mat
eria
ls •
Form
al m
eetin
g w
ith o
fficia
l hea
d of
stak
ehol
der g
roup
•
Med
iate
d (s
endi
ng o
f let
ters
to st
akeh
olde
rs)
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l suc
cess
ful
exam
ples
1=
can
cite
1 0=
No a
nsw
er
C6-S
10. C
oord
inat
ion
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u en
gage
with
mem
bers
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y? W
hy d
id y
ou
enga
ge w
ith th
em (e
.g. a
ppro
val o
f the
m
anag
emen
t pla
n, te
am b
uild
ing,
dev
elop
ing
the
M&
E pl
an, e
nfor
cem
ent e
tc.)?
Can
desc
ribe
how
he/
she
coor
dina
tes w
ith m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bo
dy a
nd ci
te e
xam
ples
of h
is/he
r int
erac
tions
with
them
. Thi
s cou
ld in
clude
ac
tiviti
es su
ch a
s: •
Draf
ting
or u
pdat
ing
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
• Ap
prov
al o
f the
man
agem
ent p
lan
• Te
am-b
uild
ing
• De
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an
• En
forc
emen
t pla
nnin
g an
d m
onito
ring
2=ca
n de
scrib
e ho
w h
e co
ordi
nate
s w
ith th
em
1=kn
ows o
nly
1 0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s 1, i
f kno
ws w
hy h
e en
gage
s w
ith th
em
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
Page
| 8
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd
othe
r age
ncie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
M
PA/N
? W
hy d
id y
ou e
ngag
e w
ith th
em
(see
k fu
ndin
g su
ppor
t, de
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an, p
rodu
ctio
n of
IEC
mat
eria
ls, e
ncou
rage
pa
rtici
patio
n, jo
int e
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
)
Ca
n de
scrib
e ho
w h
e/sh
e co
ordi
nate
s with
MPA
/N st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd o
ther
ag
encie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N a
nd ci
te e
xam
ples
of h
is/he
r in
tera
ctio
ns w
ith th
em. P
ossib
le re
ason
s for
eng
agem
ent c
an b
e:
• Se
ek su
ppor
t (fu
ndin
g, te
chni
cal a
ssist
ance
, etc
.)
• De
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an
• Pr
oduc
tion
of IE
C m
ater
ials
• En
cour
age
part
icipa
tion
and
supp
ort f
or M
PA/N
•
Join
t enf
orce
men
t C6
-S11
. Peo
ple
skill
s De
scrib
e yo
ur w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
p w
ith 1
) m
embe
rs o
f the
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
2)
stak
ehol
ders
. Ho
w d
o yo
u ha
ndle
disa
gree
men
ts b
etw
een
mem
bers
of t
he M
PA o
r MPA
/N
man
agem
ent b
ody?
Can
desc
ribe
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
(whe
ther
pos
itive
, clo
se a
nd e
ffect
ive)
with
m
embe
rs o
f man
agem
ent b
ody
as w
ell a
s sta
keho
lder
s Ha
s str
ateg
ies t
o re
solv
e co
nflic
ts a
nd d
isagr
eem
ents
am
ong
mem
bers
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y –
whi
ch m
ay b
e do
ne th
roug
h fo
rmal
and
info
rmal
m
eetin
gs a
nd co
mm
unica
tions
and
can
cite
inst
ance
s whe
n th
ese
happ
ened
2=ca
n de
scrib
e w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
ps
1=kn
ows o
nly
1 0=
N o a
nsw
er
( plu
s “1”
, if h
as st
rate
gy o
n ho
w to
ha
ndle
conf
licts
and
disa
gree
men
ts)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
ENFO
RCEM
ENT
7. C
ompe
tenc
y: D
irect
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
enf
orce
men
t pla
n fo
r the
MPA
/N
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
E7-K
16. L
aws a
nd
regu
latio
ns re
late
d to
M
PA/N
s
Wha
t per
tinen
t nat
iona
l law
s, lo
cal
ordi
nanc
es a
nd o
ther
issu
ance
s rel
ated
to
MPA
/Ns t
hat y
ou k
now
of?
W
hat a
re th
e pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
ac
tiviti
es in
you
r MPA
/N?
He m
ay g
ive
the
spec
ific o
rdin
ance
s ena
cted
for t
he M
PA/N
in th
e ar
ea, o
r the
la
w th
at w
as p
asse
d sp
ecifi
c for
the
NIPA
S as
wel
l as t
he W
ildlif
e Ac
t, am
ende
d Fi
sher
ies L
aw, R
A 11
038
(ENI
PAS
Law
), an
d ot
her l
ocal
/mun
icipa
l/pro
vinc
ial
ordi
nanc
es th
at h
ave
been
pas
sed
whi
ch a
re re
late
d to
the
MPA
/N.
Can
men
tion
activ
ities
that
are
pro
hibi
ted
in th
e M
PA/N
: -
fishi
ng in
side
the
proh
ibite
d zo
ne o
r NO
TAKE
ZON
E; in
trusio
n in
to th
e re
gula
ted
zone
; fish
ing
usin
g un
auth
orize
d ge
ar, d
ynam
ite o
r poi
son
and
noxio
us su
bsta
nces
; bui
ldin
g Ill
egal
stru
ctur
es; p
ollu
tion;
colle
ctio
n of
m
arin
e or
gani
sms;
dum
ping
of g
arba
ge; c
olle
ctio
n of
sam
ples
or m
arin
e or
gani
sms f
or sa
le; h
untin
g or
capt
ure
of e
ndan
gere
d m
arin
e or
gani
sms;
tour
ism a
ctiv
ities
in p
rohi
bite
d zo
nes,
and
man
y ot
hers
) An
d ac
tiviti
es th
at a
re a
llow
ed in
the
MPA
/N:
- re
crea
tiona
l div
ing
in d
esig
nate
d zo
ne, r
esea
rch,
nav
igat
ion,
etc
.
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l law
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if a
ble
to m
entio
n pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
act
iviti
es)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
E7-K
17. K
ey co
ncep
ts
and
best
pra
ctice
s in
MPA
/N e
nfor
cem
ent
Desc
ribe
the
maj
or e
lem
ents
of t
he
enfo
rcem
ent c
hain
(i.e
. det
ectio
n,
appr
ehen
sion,
filin
g of
case
, jud
gmen
t, et
c.)
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
en
forc
emen
t tha
t you
kno
w o
f wha
t can
Elem
ents
of a
stra
tegi
c enf
orce
men
t pla
n:
• Pr
even
tive
mec
hani
sms t
o pr
even
t or p
re-e
mp
viol
atio
ns fr
om o
ccur
ring
– so
that
regu
latio
ns sh
ould
be
diss
emin
ated
wid
ely
and
enfo
rcer
s mus
t be
read
y at
all
times
(e.g
., us
ing
billb
oard
s & si
gnag
e; b
uoys
; dia
logu
es a
nd
IECs
; dep
utat
ion/
trai
ning
of e
nfor
cers
)
2=ca
n cit
e m
ajor
ele
men
ts
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f abl
e to
men
tion
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n en
forc
emen
t)
Page
| 9
othe
rs le
arn
from
you
? Pl
ease
cite
exa
mpl
es.
• De
tect
ion
mec
hani
sm w
hich
ens
ures
that
ther
e w
ill b
e gr
eate
r cha
nces
of
unco
verin
g vi
olat
ions
thro
ugh
inst
alla
tion
of g
uard
hous
e, u
se o
f equ
ipm
ent
(bin
ocul
ars,
spot
light
s, ra
dars
) and
sate
llite
serv
ices
• Re
port
ing
mec
hani
sm in
volv
es a
ppro
ache
s tha
t will
ens
ure
viol
atio
ns a
re
conv
eyed
to e
nfor
cers
on
time
(hot
line
num
ber)
• Re
cord
ing
mec
hani
sm in
clude
s app
roac
hes t
hat w
ill e
nsur
e th
at d
etai
ls of
vi
olat
ions
are
capt
ured
and
dul
y re
cord
ed b
y th
e en
forc
ers
• Re
spon
ding
mec
hani
sms a
re st
rate
gies
to e
nsur
e th
at e
nfor
cers
are
abl
e to
st
op th
e vi
olat
ions
or r
eact
to re
port
s of v
iola
tions
(hav
ing
patr
ol v
esse
ls,
regu
lar t
rain
ing
and
refre
sher
cour
ses f
or e
nfor
cers
and
allo
catin
g bu
dget
fo
r ope
ratio
ns)
• Di
spos
al m
echa
nism
s – e
nsur
ing
viol
ator
s are
pun
ished
and
dul
y sa
nctio
ned
(loca
l adj
udica
tion
boar
d, p
rose
cutio
n, im
poun
ding
are
a fo
r con
fisca
ted
equi
pmen
t and
gea
r, et
c.)
So
me
appr
oach
es in
enf
orce
men
t:
• So
ft Ap
proa
ch –
Pre
vent
ion;
Soc
ial M
arke
ting;
Soc
ial M
obili
zatio
n;
Legi
slatio
n an
d re
gula
tion;
Info
rmat
ion
diss
emin
atio
n; C
ontin
uous
m
onito
ring
• Ha
rd A
ppro
ach
– Pr
esen
ce o
f law
enf
orce
rs; S
anct
ions
impo
sed;
Det
ectio
n,
appr
ehen
sion,
and
pro
secu
tion
activ
ities
; Neg
atin
g ec
onom
ic be
nefit
s fro
m
illeg
al a
ctiv
ities
Be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA e
nfor
cem
ent:
Join
t enf
orce
men
t; Ha
rmon
ize e
nfor
cem
ent
law
s and
regu
latio
ns; P
artic
ipat
ory
law
enf
orce
men
t; So
cial m
arke
ting;
In
form
atio
n di
ssem
inat
ion
Max
=3 p
oint
s
E7-K
18. E
nfor
cem
ent
plan
ning
W
hat w
as y
our r
ole
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
the
enfo
rcem
ent p
lan
for t
he M
PA/N
? De
scrib
e th
e m
ajor
com
pone
nts a
nd
stra
tegi
es in
the
enfo
rcem
ent p
lan.
Invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of M
PA/N
man
agem
ent:
•
High
ly in
volv
ed (a
nd ca
n de
scrib
e pr
oces
s of d
evel
opm
ent)
• M
oder
atel
y in
volv
ed
• Lit
tle in
volv
emen
t (e.
g. si
gnin
g in
vitat
ion
lett
ers,
etc.
) •
No in
volv
emen
t at a
ll
Step
s in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Enf
orce
men
t Pla
n (m
ay b
ecom
e co
mpo
nent
s):
• Po
licy
and
inst
itutio
nal r
evie
w
• Si
tuat
iona
l Ana
lysis
(iss
ue m
appi
ng)
• Id
entif
icatio
n of
enf
orce
rs
• De
fine
stra
tegi
es
• De
velo
p pl
an o
f act
ion
• M
onito
r and
eva
luat
e •
Refin
e an
d am
end
stra
tegi
es
• Up
date
bas
elin
e in
form
atio
n
3=le
ader
ship
/ m
ain
role
, 2=
hel
ped
draf
t with
oth
ers
1=m
inim
al p
artic
ipat
ion
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 1
0
E7-K
19. B
road
er
enfo
rcem
ent p
lann
ing
Is
ther
e an
enf
orce
men
t pla
n fo
r the
who
le
mun
icipa
l/ ba
y-w
ide
wat
ers?
If y
es, p
leas
e de
scrib
e br
iefly
. Is
the
enfo
rcem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N
inco
rpor
ated
in it
?
Know
ledg
eabl
e ab
out t
he e
nfor
cem
ent a
ctiv
ities
not
onl
y fo
r the
MPA
/N b
ut a
lso
on th
e ba
y-w
ide
or la
rger
scal
e Kn
ows w
heth
er e
nfor
cem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N is
inco
rpor
ated
in th
e br
oade
r en
forc
emen
t pla
n of
the
bay
or re
gion
2=kn
ows d
etai
led
plan
1=
know
s a li
ttle
abou
t pla
n 0=
No a
nsw
er
E7-S
12. A
naly
tical
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u kn
ow if
the
enfo
rcem
ent
stra
tegi
es e
mpl
oyed
are
app
ropr
iate
?
How
do
you
adap
t or a
djus
t?
The
mos
t com
mon
tool
s to
anal
yse
info
rmat
ion
rela
ted
to e
nfor
cem
ent a
re
iden
tifica
tion
of st
reng
ths,
wea
knes
ses,
oppo
rtun
ities
and
thre
ats o
r SW
OT
anal
ysis
and
scen
ario
pla
nnin
g w
hich
invo
lves
fore
cast
ing
futu
re e
vent
s usin
g a
set o
f ass
umpt
ions
. Can
des
crib
e w
hy su
ch st
rate
gies
are
use
d an
d if
they
are
ef
fect
ive/
appr
opria
te.
2=m
entio
ns se
vera
l str
ateg
ies
1=m
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0=
No a
nsw
er
8. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e ef
fect
ive
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N e
nfor
cem
ent p
lan
E8-K
20. I
mpo
rtan
ce o
f en
forc
emen
t act
iviti
es
Is th
ere
a ne
ed to
mon
itor e
nfor
cem
ent
activ
ities
? Ex
plai
n yo
ur a
nsw
er.
Wha
t are
the
tool
s/m
etho
ds th
at ca
n be
us
ed to
mon
itor/
asse
ss e
nfor
cem
ent
activ
ities
?
Know
s im
port
ance
of e
nfor
cem
ent m
onito
ring
and
the
met
hods
use
d 2=
know
s lot
s 1=
know
s at l
east
1
0=No
ans
wer
E8-K
21. C
halle
nges
to
enfo
rcem
ent
Wha
t are
the
chal
leng
es a
nd b
arrie
rs in
en
forc
emen
t?
How
do
you
addr
ess/
reso
lve
them
?
Can
cite
spec
ific c
halle
nges
in a
rea
and
disc
uss h
ow th
ese
wer
e ad
dres
sed
or
reso
lved
Ch
alle
nges
and
bar
riers
in e
nfor
cem
ent:
• So
ciocu
ltura
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Exis
ting
cust
omar
y la
ws/
loca
l rul
es a
nd
regu
latio
ns; T
radi
tiona
l die
ts (c
onsu
mpt
ion
of p
rote
cted
thre
aten
ed
spec
ies)
; Pol
itica
l int
erve
ntio
n •
Polit
ical b
arrie
rs in
the
area
– P
arty
affi
liatio
n; P
atro
nage
; War
ds a
nd v
oter
s •
Econ
omic
barr
iers
in th
e ar
ea –
Live
lihoo
d; B
usin
ess i
nter
ests
; Fisc
al
limita
tions
•
Tech
nica
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Juris
dict
ions
; Im
poun
dmen
t; Ev
iden
ce
(spe
cies e
xam
inat
ion)
; Det
entio
n •
Tech
nolo
gica
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Equ
ipm
ent a
nd in
frast
ruct
ures
; Glo
bal
Posit
ioni
ng S
yste
m; P
atro
l boa
ts
• In
stitu
tiona
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Tur
fing;
Com
petit
ions
; Pro
ximity
; Lac
k of
ca
pacit
y; F
iscal
prio
ritie
s St
rate
gies
to a
ddre
ss/ r
esol
ve ch
alle
nges
can
inclu
de:
• Ca
pacit
y de
velo
pmen
t •
Com
mun
ity co
nsul
tatio
ns a
nd p
artic
ipat
ion
• Sh
ared
enf
orce
men
t •
Acqu
isitio
n of
equ
ipm
ent/
mat
eria
ls
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s how
to re
solv
e th
em)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
Page
| 1
1
E8-S
13. E
nfor
cem
ent
stra
tegi
es
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at e
nfor
cem
ent
activ
ities
are
effe
ctiv
ely
done
?
Use
of e
nfor
cem
ent c
hain
– d
etec
tion,
app
rehe
nsio
n, fi
ling
of ca
se, j
udge
men
t, et
c.
Cond
ucts
enf
orce
men
t usin
g va
rious
stra
tegi
es:
• Pr
even
tive
mec
hani
sms u
sing
billb
oard
s & si
gnag
e; b
uoys
; dia
logu
es a
nd
IECs
; dep
utat
ion/
trai
ning
of e
nfor
cers
•
Dete
ctio
n th
roug
h in
stal
latio
n of
gua
rdho
use,
use
of e
quip
men
t (bi
nocu
lars
, sp
otlig
hts,
rada
rs) a
nd sa
telli
te se
rvic
es
• Re
port
ing
mec
hani
sm u
sing
hotli
ne n
umbe
r and
mob
ile p
hone
s for
en
forc
ers
• Re
cord
ing
mec
hani
sm –
Kee
p re
cord
s and
logs
of a
ctiv
ities
; Rep
orts
of
viol
atio
ns
• Re
spon
ding
mec
hani
sms b
y em
pow
erm
ent o
f loc
als t
o pa
rtici
pate
; pr
ocur
emen
t of p
atro
l ves
sels;
regu
lar t
rain
ing
and
refre
sher
cour
ses f
or
enfo
rcer
s; al
loca
ting
budg
et fo
r ope
ratio
ns
• Di
spos
al m
echa
nism
s – e
nsur
ing
viol
ator
s are
pun
ished
by
esta
blish
men
t of
a lo
cal a
djud
icatio
n bo
ard;
pro
secu
tion;
ava
ilabi
lity
of im
poun
ding
are
a fo
r co
nfisc
ated
equ
ipm
ent a
nd g
ear;
prot
ectio
n of
cust
ody
chai
n
2=kn
ows s
ever
al
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
E8-S
14. M
akes
corr
ect
judg
emen
t cal
ls Ho
w d
o yo
u de
cide
prob
lem
atic
case
s re
late
d to
enf
orce
men
t? W
hat b
asis
do
you
use?
Des
crib
e an
exa
mpl
e.
Can
cite
an e
xam
ple
of p
robl
emat
ic ca
ses t
hat e
xhib
ited
good
judg
men
t cal
l To
dec
ide
prob
lem
atic
case
s/vi
olat
ions
he/
she
may
refe
r to
exist
ing
law
s and
re
gula
tions
(Fish
erie
s Cod
e &
Wild
life
Act;
ordi
nanc
es; e
xecu
tive
orde
rs;
reso
lutio
ns; a
nd a
dmin
istra
tive
orde
rs);
cons
ult e
nfor
cem
ent t
eam
or o
ther
en
forc
emen
t age
ncie
s
2=ca
n pr
ovid
e se
vera
l exa
mpl
es o
f go
od ju
dgem
ent c
alls
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 1
2
MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
9. C
ompe
tenc
y: D
evel
op a
nd im
plem
ent a
n ef
fect
ive
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
(M&
E) p
rogr
am a
nd fe
edba
ck sy
stem
Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g M
9-K2
2. M
PA/N
etw
ork
obje
ctiv
es a
nd b
enef
its
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
MPA
/N?
Wha
t ind
icato
r/s n
eed
to b
e m
onito
red
to
dete
rmin
e if
thes
e ob
ject
ives
are
bei
ng m
et?
Know
s the
obj
ectiv
es &
indi
cato
rs o
f the
MPA
/N w
hich
can
inclu
de:
• Sus
tain
able
fish
erie
s – in
crea
sed
fish
stoc
k (b
iom
ass,
abun
danc
e); i
ncre
ased
fis
h ca
tch
(CPU
E); i
ncre
ased
/mai
ntai
ned
larv
al su
pply
/rec
ruitm
ent;
abse
nce/
decr
ease
of i
llega
l/des
truct
ive
fishi
ng p
ract
ices
• Bio
dive
rsity
cons
erva
tion
– pr
otec
tion
of cr
itica
l hab
itats
; mai
ntai
ned
ecol
ogica
l con
nect
ivity
; im
prov
ed st
atus
of t
hrea
tene
d sp
ecie
s; im
prov
ed
popu
latio
n siz
e • C
limat
e ch
ange
ada
ptat
ion
– pr
otec
tion
of re
silie
nt a
reas
; pro
tect
ion
of
criti
cal h
abita
ts; p
rote
ctio
n sim
ilar h
abita
ts a
long
env
ironm
enta
l gra
dien
t; re
duce
d th
reat
s; en
hanc
e ec
olog
ical c
onne
ctiv
ity
• Int
er-L
GU a
llian
ce –
Mem
oran
dum
of A
gree
men
ts; h
arm
onize
d CR
M re
late
d or
dina
nces
; joi
nt e
nfor
cem
ent
• Eco
tour
ism –
equ
itabl
e be
nefit
s; in
crea
sed
inco
me
• Pro
tect
ion
of th
reat
ened
spec
ies –
impr
oved
stat
us o
f thr
eate
ned
spec
ies;
impr
oved
pop
ulat
ion
size
• Soc
ial n
etw
ork
– in
crea
sed
colla
bora
tions
; sha
ring
of e
xper
tise
and
reso
urce
s; ex
chan
ge o
f kno
wle
dge
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l obj
ectiv
es
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1 o
bjec
tive
0= N
o an
swer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f kno
ws i
ndica
tors
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
M9-
K23.
MPA
/N
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
prog
ram
Wha
t is m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n an
d w
hy
is it
impo
rtan
t?
Does
you
r MPA
/N h
ave
a M
&E
prog
ram
? If
yes,
wha
t was
you
r inv
olve
men
t in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
Can
expl
ain
wha
t is b
eing
mon
itore
d an
d ev
alua
ted
whi
ch m
ay in
clude
the
stat
us
of m
anag
emen
t effe
ctiv
enes
s; co
mpe
tenc
e/ca
pacit
y of
the
man
agem
ent b
ody;
st
atus
of c
oast
al a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces;
as w
ell a
s soc
ioec
onom
ic fa
ctor
s M
&E
is do
ne fo
r the
follo
win
g re
ason
s: •
To d
eter
min
e ef
fect
iven
ess o
f act
iviti
es in
ach
ievi
ng g
oals
and
obje
ctiv
es
• Fo
r dec
ision
mak
ing
and
plan
ning
of a
ctiv
ity
• Ca
n be
use
d as
bas
is fo
r tra
inin
gs/w
orks
hops
Ca
n di
scus
s lev
el o
f inv
olve
men
t, if
any,
on
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M&
E pr
ogra
m
2=ve
ry k
now
ledg
eabl
e (s
ever
al it
ems
/ rea
sons
not
ed)
1=m
entio
ns a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
M9-
K24.
Com
pone
nts o
f th
e M
&E
prog
ram
-
Perfo
rman
ce M
&E
syst
em
- Ec
olog
ical/
biop
hysic
al M
&E
syst
em
- So
cio-e
cono
mic
M&
E sy
stem
Wha
t are
the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of y
our M
&E
prog
ram
– d
oes i
t inc
lude
a co
mpo
nent
on
perfo
rman
ce o
f man
agem
ent b
ody,
ec
olog
ical c
ompo
nent
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
com
pone
nt?
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f eac
h co
mpo
nent
?
The
M&
E pr
ogra
m u
sual
ly h
as m
any
com
pone
nts a
nd ca
n in
clude
the
follo
win
g co
mpo
nent
s, ob
ject
ives
and
tool
s to
mea
sure
them
: •
Perfo
rman
ce &
effe
ctiv
enes
s of m
anag
emen
t bod
y –
impr
ove
capa
city
and
com
pete
nce
of m
anag
emen
t bod
y, F
inan
cial s
usta
inab
ility
, Bud
get
allo
catio
ns, C
olla
bora
tion
with
oth
er st
akeh
olde
rs, A
dopt
ion
of o
rdin
ance
s su
ppor
ting
MPA
/N
▪ TO
OLS:
MEA
T, M
ETT,
NEA
T, e
tc.
• Ec
olog
ical/
biop
hysic
al –
mon
itor c
hang
es in
fish
bio
mas
s and
den
sity
(incr
ease
d/m
aint
aine
d), I
ncre
ased
/mai
ntai
ned
seag
rass
, man
grov
e an
d co
ral c
over
s; Pr
otec
tion
of cr
itica
l hab
itats
▪
TOOL
S: H
abita
t mon
itorin
g th
roug
h va
rious
met
hods
fish
visu
al
cens
us, t
rans
ect s
urve
ys w
ith p
hoto
quad
rats
or L
IT, R
eef C
heck
, etc
. •
Socio
-eco
nom
ic –
incr
ease
d in
com
e, in
crea
sed
socia
l gro
ups
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l com
pone
nts,
tolls
and
obj
ectiv
es
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1 co
mpo
nent
, ob
ject
ive,
at l
east
, with
or w
ithou
t to
ol
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 1
3
• TO
OLS:
land
ed ca
tch
surv
ey, m
arke
t sur
vey,
SEA
T, fi
sh ca
tch
mon
itorin
g (C
PUE)
M
9-K2
5. In
dica
tors
use
d in
M&
E
- Pe
rform
ance
M&
E -
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M&
E So
cio-e
cono
mic
M&
E
Wha
t are
the
indi
cato
rs th
at y
ou m
onito
r for
ea
ch o
f the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of y
our M
&E
prog
ram
? In
the
tabl
e on
the
right
, che
ck th
e in
dica
tors
th
at y
ou u
se a
nd sp
ecify
how
ofte
n th
ey a
re
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Acro
nym
s use
d:
MEA
T –
MPA
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess
Asse
ssm
ent T
ool
MET
T –
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess T
rack
ing
Tool
NE
AT –
Net
wor
k Ef
fect
iven
ess A
sses
smen
t Too
l CP
UE –
Cat
ch p
er u
nit e
ffort
Chec
k th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify h
ow o
ften
they
are
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Indi
cato
rs
Chec
k if
mon
itore
d Sc
hedu
le o
f m
onito
ring
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A.
Leve
l & ra
ting
(MEA
T)
B. S
core
(MET
T)
C. Le
vel &
ratin
g (N
EAT)
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL
A. %
live
cora
l cov
er
B. F
ish b
iom
ass (
tons
/sqk
m)
C. %
seag
rass
cove
r or d
ensit
y
D.
Num
ber o
f spe
cies:
1.
Fish
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
E. %
man
grov
e ca
nopy
cove
r
F.
Tot
al a
rea
(hec
tare
s)
1. C
oral
reef
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
G. M
arin
e m
amm
al si
ghtin
gs &
m
orta
litie
s (sp
ecie
s)
H. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A. H
ouse
hold
inco
me
B. F
ish ca
tch
(CPU
E)
C. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
2=ve
ry k
now
ledg
eabl
e (c
heck
s se
vera
l ite
ms)
1=
men
tions
at l
east
1
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, w
ith sc
hedu
le o
f m
onito
ring
indi
cate
d)
(Max
poi
nts=
3)
Page
| 1
4
M9-
S15.
Effe
ctiv
ely
cond
uct M
&E
surv
eys
Do y
ou co
nduc
t M&
E su
rvey
s (i.e
. pe
rform
ance
, soc
io-e
cono
mic,
eco
logi
cal)?
Ha
ve y
ou re
ceiv
ed a
ny tr
aini
ngs o
n M
PA/N
M&
E? N
ame
trai
ning
s rec
eive
d.
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls
on a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht.
SCAL
E:
0 –
None
1
– W
ith tr
aini
ng/ h
as a
ssist
ed a
few
tim
es
2 –
Can
perfo
rm w
ith m
inim
um su
perv
ision
3
– Ca
n pe
rform
inde
pend
ently
4
– Ca
n su
perv
ise a
gro
up
Acro
nym
s use
d:
CPCE
– C
oral
poi
nt co
unt w
ith E
xcel
ex
tens
ions
SE
AT –
Soc
io-e
cono
mic
Asse
ssm
ent T
ool
SocM
on –
Soc
ioec
onom
ic M
onito
ring
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox u
sing
the
indi
cate
d sc
ale
(see
left
colu
mn)
.
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
skill
s 0
1 2
3 4
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A. M
EAT
B.
MET
T
C. N
EAT
D.
Oth
er:
ECOL
OGIC
AL/ B
IOPH
YSIC
AL
A.
Cor
al re
ef a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
1. M
anta
tow
2
. Lin
e in
terc
ept t
rans
ect (
LIT)
3
. Pho
toqu
adra
t & C
PCE
4. F
ish v
isual
cens
us (F
VC)
5. R
eef C
heck
B. S
eagr
ass a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
C.
Sea
wee
d as
sess
men
t & m
onito
ring
D.
Bea
ch fo
rest
ass
essm
ent &
mon
itorin
g
E. In
vert
ebra
te a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
F.
Cet
acea
n id
entif
icatio
n/ su
rvey
G. M
arin
e tu
rtle
iden
tifica
tion/
surv
ey
H.
Sea
bird
surv
ey
I.
Othe
r:
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A.
SEA
T
B. S
ocM
on
C.
Oth
er:
2=hi
ghly
-ski
lled
(che
cks 2
or m
ore
item
s)
1=le
ss sk
illed
(che
cks o
nly
1)
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, w
ith tr
aini
ngs)
(M
ax p
oint
s=3)
M9-
S16.
Pla
nnin
g an
d or
gani
zing
skill
s Ho
w d
id y
ou fa
cilita
te th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
How
do
you
plan
for a
ctua
l M&
E ac
tiviti
es?
Can
disc
uss w
ith so
me
deta
il on
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
M&
E pr
ogra
m (c
an m
entio
n ac
tiviti
es th
at h
ave
been
don
e an
d ho
w th
ey
wer
e su
cces
sful
ly ca
rrie
d ou
t)
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 1
5
10. C
ompe
tenc
y: F
orm
ulat
e ad
aptiv
e m
anag
emen
t str
ateg
ies b
ased
on
mon
itorin
g and
eva
luat
ion
resu
lts.
M10
-K26
. Ada
ptiv
e m
anag
emen
t con
cept
s an
d im
port
ance
of
feed
back
Adap
tive
man
agem
ent i
nvol
ves t
he u
se o
f re
sults
from
M&
E to
adj
ust t
he o
pera
tiona
l im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
PA/N
. Can
you
cite
an
inst
ance
whe
re a
dapt
ive
man
agem
ent
was
pra
ctice
d in
you
r are
a (e
.g. o
n CR
M o
r M
PA p
rogr
ams)
? W
hat a
re th
e po
ssib
le fe
edba
ckin
g m
echa
nism
s for
the
MPA
/N a
nd h
ow
regu
larly
is it
don
e?
Fam
iliar
with
the
conc
epts
of a
dapt
ive
man
agem
ent a
nd ca
n cit
e an
exa
mpl
e of
ho
w it
was
pra
ctice
d (e
.g. a
djus
tmen
t of a
ctiv
ities
/inte
rven
tions
dep
endi
ng o
n cu
rren
t situ
atio
n an
d on
M&
E re
sults
) M
&E
resu
lts ca
n be
use
d fo
r lea
rnin
g; fo
r dec
ision
mak
ing
and
plan
ning
for
addi
tiona
l act
iviti
es a
nd im
prov
emen
t of i
nter
vent
ions
; to
enco
urag
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y an
d st
akeh
olde
rs to
bet
ter p
erfo
rm th
eir d
utie
s; an
d as
bas
is fo
r inc
entiv
e/ d
isinc
entiv
e sy
stem
. Ca
n en
umer
ate
way
s of g
ivin
g/ge
tting
feed
back
on
the
MPA
/N a
nd k
now
s the
im
port
ance
of f
eedb
ack
feed
back
ing
M&
E re
sults
to co
nstit
uent
s/pa
rtne
rs
2=kn
ows a
dapt
ive
man
agem
ent w
ell
and
can
cite
exam
ples
1=
know
s som
e 0=
No
answ
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s fee
dbac
king
m
echa
nism
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
M10
-K27
. Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
repo
rts
Wha
t sho
uld
be p
rese
nted
and
inclu
ded
in
the
M&
E re
port
s?
Info
rmat
ion
inclu
ded
in M
&E
repo
rts
• Tr
end
of th
e st
ate
of p
erfo
rman
ce, e
colo
gica
l, an
d so
cio e
cono
mic
• Ef
fect
iven
ess o
f act
iviti
es in
ach
ievi
ng g
oals
and
obje
ctiv
es
• Ch
alle
nges
affe
ctin
g pe
rform
ance
of m
anag
emen
t bod
y •
Thre
ats a
ffect
ing
coas
tal a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces
• Ch
alle
nges
affe
ctin
g so
cioec
onom
ic st
atus
•
Reco
mm
enda
tions
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
N o a
nsw
er
M10
-S17
. Ana
lytic
al sk
ills
to fo
rmul
ate
appr
opria
te
inte
rven
tions
Can
you
cite
exam
ples
of i
nter
vent
ions
/ im
prov
ed st
rate
gies
that
you
impl
emen
ted
afte
r see
ing
the
resu
lts o
f the
M&
E? W
hy
wer
e th
ese
done
?
Som
e of
the
inte
rven
tions
that
may
be
done
: •
Whe
n m
anag
emen
t effe
ctiv
enes
s is l
ow –
cond
ucts
skill
s tra
inin
gs/
wor
ksho
ps, i
mpr
ove
finan
cial s
trat
egie
s, co
nduc
ts a
dditi
onal
act
iviti
es, e
tc.
• W
hen
ecol
ogica
l sta
tus i
s low
– st
reng
then
s enf
orce
men
t, re
duce
s hab
itat
thre
ats,
impr
ove
MPA
des
ign,
etc
. •
Whe
n so
cioec
onom
ic st
atus
is lo
w –
cond
ucts
aw
aren
ess c
ampa
igns
, co
nduc
ts li
velih
ood
trai
ning
s, co
nduc
ts a
ctiv
ities
to in
crea
se so
cial c
ohes
ion,
et
c.
2= ca
n cit
e m
any
exam
ples
1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
exa
mpl
e 0=
No a
nsw
er
M10
-S18
. Tec
hnica
l w
ritin
g, e
ffect
ive
feed
back
and
pr
esen
tatio
n sk
ills o
f M
&E
resu
lts
How
do
you
give
feed
back
abo
ut th
e M
&E
resu
lts?
How
wou
ld y
ou ra
te y
ours
elf i
n te
rms o
f te
chni
cal w
ritin
g an
d pr
esen
tatio
n sk
ills t
o ef
fect
ivel
y fe
edba
ck M
&E
resu
lts?
Rate
you
r ski
lls o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
usin
g th
e ta
ble
in th
e rig
ht.
Feed
back
ing
coul
d be
don
e th
roug
h su
bmiss
ion
of re
port
s (te
chni
cal r
epor
ts),
publ
ic pr
esen
tatio
ns d
urin
g ge
nera
l ass
embl
y m
eetin
gs (m
ay b
e th
roug
h a
vide
o,
play
, etc
.), e
tc.
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox. S
cale
: 0 b
eing
NON
E, 1
-POO
R, 2
-MOD
ERAT
E, 3
-GO
OD, 4
-EXC
ELLE
NT
SKILL
S 0
1 2
3 4
1. T
echn
ical w
ritin
g
2. F
eedb
acki
ng
3.
Pre
sent
atio
n sk
ills
2= ca
n cit
e se
vera
l way
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
way
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if r
ates
skill
s at 3
-4)
(Max
poi
nts=
3)
Page
| 1
6
11. C
ompe
tenc
y: L
inki
ng M
&E
resu
lts w
ith p
erfo
rman
ce-b
ased
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
s for
MPA
/N im
plem
enta
tion
M11
-K28
. Per
form
ance
-ba
sed
ince
ntiv
e/
disin
cent
ive
syst
ems
Plea
se ci
te b
est p
ract
ices o
n pe
rform
ance
-ba
sed
ince
ntiv
e/di
since
ntiv
e sy
stem
rela
ted
to M
PA/N
man
agem
ent.
Are
you
adop
ting
thes
e pr
actic
es in
you
r are
a?
Wha
t are
the
crite
ria/b
ases
for t
he
perfo
rman
ce e
valu
atio
n?
Wha
t was
you
r par
ticip
atio
n in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f thi
s sys
tem
?
Can
desc
ribe
diffe
rent
per
form
ance
-bas
ed in
cent
ive/
disin
cent
ive
syst
ems f
or
MPA
/Ns i
mpl
emen
ted
in th
e ar
ea.
Reco
gniti
on a
nd a
war
ds g
iven
for B
est M
anag
ed M
PAs,
Best
MPA
Net
wor
k, B
est
NIPA
S, O
utst
andi
ng M
PA p
erso
nnel
, Ban
tay
Daga
t, Pr
otec
ted
Area
Ran
ger o
r W
ildlif
e En
forc
emen
t Offi
cer
Crite
ria fo
r thi
s can
be
the
MEA
T or
NEA
T sc
ores
, eva
luat
ion
and
valid
atio
n an
d fo
r ind
ivid
uals
this
may
be
perfe
ct a
tten
danc
e in
all
mee
tings
/ act
iviti
es, d
ilige
nce
and
activ
e pa
rtici
patio
n, e
tc.
2=ca
n de
scrib
e se
vera
l 1=
can
desc
ribe
at le
ast 1
0=
No
answ
er
M11
-S19
. Mak
es co
rrec
t ju
dgem
ent c
alls
How
do
you
rew
ard/
puni
sh m
embe
rs o
f the
M
PA m
anag
emen
t bod
y? C
ite in
stan
ces
whe
n th
ese
wer
e gi
ven.
Can
desc
ribe
a sy
stem
whi
ch h
as cl
ear b
asis
for m
akin
g ju
dgm
ent o
r dec
ision
s to
rew
ard/
puni
sh M
PA p
erso
nnel
(per
fect
atte
ndan
ce in
all
activ
ities
and
mee
tings
, ac
tive
part
icipa
tion,
dili
genc
e, e
tc.)
and
cite
exam
ple
of w
hen
they
wer
e gi
ven
2=ca
n gi
ve se
vera
l exa
mpl
es
1=ca
n gi
ve a
t lea
st 1
exa
mpl
e 0=
No a
nsw
er
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (SC
ORE)
No
t at
all
(0)
Som
e-tim
es
(1)
Mos
t of
the
time
(2)
All t
he
time
(3)
1.
I i
nitia
te e
vent
s and
pro
vide
gui
danc
e an
d le
ader
ship
to m
y te
am.
2.
I a
m h
ones
t in
all m
y de
alin
gs.
3.
I a
m a
ppro
acha
ble
and
easy
to ta
lk w
ith.
4.
I a
m w
illin
g to
lear
n ne
w id
eas a
nd sk
ills.
5.
I fac
ilita
te p
artic
ipat
ion
and
coop
erat
ion
amon
g st
akeh
olde
rs in
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N.
6.
I a
m d
ilige
nt a
nd h
ardw
orki
ng to
acc
ompl
ish th
e ob
ject
ives
of o
ur M
PA/N
.
7.
I str
ive
to p
erfo
rm m
y du
ties a
nd re
spon
sibili
ties t
o th
e be
st o
f my
abili
ties a
nd w
ithou
t any
ves
ted
inte
rest
.
8.
I am
ope
n to
the
cont
ribut
ion
of id
eas f
rom
oth
ers i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he m
anag
emen
t pla
n.
9.
I c
an p
lan
stra
tegi
cally
tow
ards
the
achi
evem
ent o
f a g
oal.
Page
| 1
7
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (SC
ORE)
No
t at
all
(0)
Som
e of
th
e tim
e (1
)
Mos
t of
the
time
(2)
All t
he
time
(3)
10
. I a
dher
e to
the
prin
ciple
s of g
ood
gove
rnan
ce, i
.e. t
rans
pare
ncy,
acc
ount
abili
ty a
nd p
artic
ipat
ory,
etc
. in
the
de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n.
11
. I a
m re
sour
cefu
l and
can
help
raise
, mob
ilize
and
secu
re fu
nds f
or th
e M
PA/N
.
12. I
adh
ere
to th
e st
anda
rds o
f tra
nspa
renc
y an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
in a
ll fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
.
13. I
am
met
iculo
us a
nd I
alw
ays s
ee to
it th
at th
e fu
nds a
re sp
ent w
isely
and
frug
ally
, and
liqu
idat
ed p
rope
rly a
nd o
n
tim
e.
14
. I a
m fa
ir in
allo
catin
g fu
nds.
15
. I co
nduc
t my
finan
cial a
nd a
dmin
istra
tive
dutie
s in
a sy
stem
atic
and
effic
ient
man
ner.
16
. I ca
n de
term
ine
appr
opria
te m
essa
ges,
com
mun
icatio
n te
chni
ques
and
IEC
mat
eria
ls ne
eded
for v
ario
us a
udie
nces
.
17. I
hel
p de
velo
p an
d im
plem
ent l
aws a
nd p
olici
es fo
r the
goo
d of
all
and
not f
or m
y ow
n pe
rson
al in
tere
st.
18
. I a
m p
ublic
serv
ice-o
rient
ed a
nd su
ppor
tive
of im
plem
entin
g en
forc
emen
t act
iviti
es a
ccor
ding
to th
e ru
le o
f law
.
19. I
n en
forc
ing
the
law
, I e
xerc
ise se
nsiti
vity
to o
ther
cultu
res,
gend
er a
nd th
e in
dige
nous
peo
ple’
s rig
hts.
20. I
am
fair
and
hone
st in
enf
orcin
g th
e la
w.
21
. I w
elco
me
inte
r-age
ncy
colla
bora
tion
with
oth
er e
nfor
cem
ent g
roup
s and
shar
ing
of id
eas a
nd re
sour
ces t
o he
lp
add
ress
issu
es in
our
wat
ers.
22
. I p
rom
ote
stric
t com
plia
nce
to th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of a
ctio
n pl
ans (
e.g.
M&
E Pl
an, F
inan
cial P
lan,
Enf
orce
men
t
P
lan,
etc
.)
23
. I ca
n m
ake
decis
ions
bas
ed o
n fa
cts a
nd v
alid
info
rmat
ion.
24. I
reco
gnize
effo
rts,
give
cred
it to
peo
ple
and
prov
ide
oppo
rtun
ities
for a
dvan
cem
ent a
nd p
rom
otio
n to
per
sonn
el
a
nd st
aff.
25
. I h
ave
fore
sight
, ini
tiativ
e an
d ha
ve a
pla
n fo
r the
futu
re.
26
. I a
m a
dapt
ive
and
capa
ble
of m
akin
g ap
prop
riate
chan
ges a
s nee
ded,
bas
ed o
n co
rrec
t inf
orm
atio
n.
Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners 127
GUIDE TO ADMINISTERING THE TOOL AND SCORING
Personnel Category C
Page
| 1
PERS
ONNE
L CAT
EGOR
Y C
Guid
e to
Adm
inist
erin
g the
Too
l & S
corin
g
PLAN
NING
1.
Com
pete
ncy:
Con
trib
ute
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t, re
view
and
upd
atin
g of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g P1
-K1.
Sta
te a
nd
impo
rtan
ce o
f coa
stal
an
d m
arin
e re
sour
ces
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces i
n yo
ur
area
s?
Wha
t is t
he im
port
ant o
f man
agin
g th
ese
mar
ine
reso
urce
s?
Desc
ribe
the
stat
e of
coas
tal a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
seag
rass
/ man
grov
e/ co
ral
reef
s/ fi
sher
ies e
tc.)
of th
e ar
ea:
• W
here
are
they
loca
ted?
•
Can
you
estim
ate
thei
r size
(hec
tare
s), c
over
(per
cent
, lus
h, th
ick, e
tc.)
and
cond
ition
(poo
r, go
od, e
xcel
lent
)?
• Ho
w a
bout
the
fish
catc
h of
fish
erm
en –
wha
t is t
he a
vera
ge fi
sh ca
tch?
Kn
ows i
mpo
rtan
ce o
f mar
ine
reso
urce
s suc
h as
: •
Prov
ision
ing
– so
urce
of f
ood
(fish
, she
llfish
, sea
wee
d, ti
mbe
r, dr
ugs,
etc.
) •
Regu
latin
g –
coas
tal p
rote
ctio
n, p
reve
ntio
n of
ero
sion,
wat
er p
urifi
catio
n,
carb
on st
orag
e •
Cultu
ral,
spiri
tual
, bea
uty
2=ca
n de
scrib
e st
atus
of r
esou
rces
1=
can
desc
ribe
at le
ast 1
(p
lus "
1", i
f kno
ws i
mpo
rtan
ce)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
P1-K
2. M
PA/N
etw
ork
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t was
you
r rol
e in
the
deve
lopm
ent
proc
ess o
f you
r MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
cont
ents
of t
he M
PA/N
m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
Invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of M
PA/N
man
agem
ent:
•
High
ly in
volv
ed (a
nd ca
n de
scrib
e pr
oces
s of d
evel
opm
ent)
• M
oder
atel
y in
volv
ed
• Lit
tle in
volv
emen
t (e.
g. si
gnin
g in
vitat
ion
lett
ers,
etc.
) •
No in
volv
emen
t at a
ll
Has a
n id
ea o
f the
gen
eral
cont
ents
of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
such
as:
•
Ratio
nale
and
pur
pose
of M
PA/N
or V
ision
, Miss
ion
and
Goal
setti
ng
• Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
mar
ine
reso
urce
s •
Lega
l fra
mew
ork
• Or
gani
zatio
nal s
truct
ure
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Stra
tegi
c act
ion
plan
s (fo
r M&
E, E
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
) •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Pena
lties
and
fine
s •
Othe
r ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
2=Hi
ghly
invo
lved
1=
mod
erat
ely
invo
lved
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s con
tent
s of p
lan)
(M
ax=3
poi
nts)
P1-K
3. A
sses
smen
t/
Iden
tifica
tion
of
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s in
your
M
PA/N
?
Know
s how
to co
nduc
t risk
/ thr
eat a
sses
smen
t and
can
desc
ribe
impa
cts o
f th
ese
thre
ats i
n th
e ar
ea
2= C
an d
escr
ibe
man
y im
port
ant
poin
ts
Page
| 2
ris
ks/t
hrea
ts to
the
MPA
/N
Wha
t are
the
impa
cts o
f the
se th
reat
s?
Know
s the
maj
or th
reat
s affe
ctin
g th
eir m
arin
e re
sour
ces,
such
as:
•
Over
-ext
ract
ion
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
may
spec
ify w
hich
reso
urce
s)
• Re
clam
atio
n or
conv
ersio
n of
cert
ain
part
s of t
he se
a fo
r oth
er u
ses (
e.g.
fis
h po
nds,
port
s, hu
man
settl
emen
t are
as)
• Ill
egal
fish
ing
prac
tices
: ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
• Se
dim
enta
tion
• Po
llutio
n
• In
adeq
uate
supp
ort (
e.g.
, exe
cutiv
e, le
gisla
tive,
per
sonn
el, f
unds
, etc
.) to
m
anag
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces p
rope
rly
• Ot
her t
hrea
ts: _
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
1=Ca
n cit
e at
leas
t one
0=
No
answ
er
2. C
ompe
tenc
y: C
ontr
ibut
e to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring o
f the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n P2
-K4.
Impl
emen
ting
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t are
the
MPA
/N p
rogr
ams a
nd/o
r act
ion
plan
s tha
t are
bei
ng im
plem
ente
d?
Can
you
men
tion
som
e ac
tiviti
es in
the
plan
th
at h
ave
and
have
not
bee
n do
ne?
Has k
now
ledg
e of
the
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring
of th
e m
anag
emen
t pl
an (p
rogr
ams o
n M
&E,
Enf
orce
men
t, et
c.).
Ab
le to
des
crib
e so
me
of th
e ac
tiviti
es co
nduc
ted
such
as:
•
Mon
itorin
g of
cora
l ree
fs, s
eagr
ass,
man
grov
es a
nd fi
sh ca
tch
• IE
C ac
tiviti
es a
nd fe
edba
ckin
g of
mon
itorin
g re
sults
•
Patr
ollin
g •
Cons
truc
tion
of g
uard
hous
e •
Acqu
isitio
n of
equ
ipm
ent
• Es
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd m
aint
enan
ce o
f buo
ys
• Re
gula
r mee
tings
•
Upda
ting
of M
PA/N
Pla
n
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
P2-S
1. C
apac
ity n
eeds
as
sess
men
ts
How
do
you
asse
ss th
e ca
pacit
y ne
eds o
f the
M
PA/N
tech
nica
l tea
m?
Have
thes
e ca
pacit
y ne
eds b
een
addr
esse
d?
Nam
e tr
aini
ngs c
ondu
cted
.
Trai
ning
s/ ca
pacit
y ne
eds a
sses
smen
t (TN
A/CA
N) a
re co
nduc
ted
and
pers
onne
l an
d st
aff a
re g
iven
rele
vant
trai
ning
s suc
h as
: •
Exp
osur
e vi
sits t
o su
cces
sful
MPA
/Ns
• F
inan
cial l
itera
cy, a
ccou
ntin
g an
d bo
okke
epin
g tr
aini
ngs
• Le
ader
ship
trai
ning
•
Val
ues f
orm
atio
n tr
aini
ng
• H
abita
t ass
essm
ent a
nd m
onito
ring
train
ing
• R
eef C
heck
and
div
ing
train
ing
• C
omm
unica
tions
trai
ning
•
Live
lihoo
d tr
aini
ngs
2=kn
ows o
r use
s sev
eral
stra
tegi
es
1=kn
ows 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
P2-S
2. A
dept
in
mon
itorin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
proc
edur
es
How
do
you
cont
ribut
e to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
pro
gram
s and
stra
tegi
es in
dica
ted
in th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
• Pe
rform
s a ro
le in
the
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring
of th
e m
anag
emen
t pla
n (p
rogr
ams o
n M
&E,
Enf
orce
men
t, et
c.) s
uch
as:
• M
onito
ring
of co
ral r
eefs
, sea
gras
s, m
angr
oves
and
fish
catc
h •
IEC
activ
ities
and
feed
back
ing
of m
onito
ring
resu
lts
• Pa
trol
ling
• Co
nstr
uctio
n of
gua
rdho
use
• Ac
quisi
tion
of e
quip
men
t
2=Kn
ows o
r use
s sev
eral
stra
tegi
es
1=Kn
ows a
t lea
st o
ne
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 3
• Es
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd m
aint
enan
ce o
f buo
ys
• Re
gula
r mee
tings
•
Upda
ting
of M
PA/N
Pla
n
FINA
NCIN
G 3.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ass
ist in
pre
parin
g fin
ancin
g-re
late
d pl
ans
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
F3-K
5. T
heor
y, b
est
prac
tices
and
stra
tegi
es
for d
evel
opin
g su
stai
nabl
e fin
ancia
l an
d bu
sines
s pla
ns
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
su
stai
nabl
e fin
ancin
g th
at y
ou k
now
of?
W
hat f
inan
ce-re
late
d pl
an/s
hav
e yo
u he
lped
pr
epar
e?
Why
is it
impo
rtan
t to
have
them
?
Know
s bes
t pra
ctice
s in
sust
aina
ble
finan
cing.
Can
cite
exam
ple/
s.
Has e
xper
ienc
e in
pre
parin
g/de
velo
ping
a fi
nanc
ial p
lan
and
busin
ess p
lan
for
the
MPA
/N (e
.g. a
nnua
l fin
ancia
l pla
n, b
usin
ess p
lan,
sust
aina
bilit
y pl
an)
Diffe
renc
e be
twee
n a
finan
cial a
nd a
bus
ines
s pla
n:
• Bu
sines
s pla
n –
Cust
omer
bas
e; G
oods
and
serv
ices (
of th
e M
PA/N
); M
arke
ting
stra
tegy
(i.e
. des
crip
tion
of p
rodu
cts/
serv
ices,
mar
ket t
rend
s, pr
icing
etc
.); Im
plem
enta
tion
stra
tegy
(i.e
. ope
ratio
nal p
lans
and
st
rate
gies
) •
Fina
ncia
l pla
n –
Proj
ecte
d ac
tiviti
es; F
inan
cial r
equi
rem
ents
/bud
get n
eeds
(i.
e. a
mou
nt a
nd ti
min
g of
fund
ing)
; App
ropr
iate
fund
ing
sour
ces;
Prof
it an
d lo
ss p
roje
ctio
ns
In sh
ort –
a b
usin
ess p
lan
look
s at h
ow to
gai
n m
oney
usin
g th
e go
ods a
nd
serv
ices o
f the
MPA
/N w
hile
a fi
nanc
ial p
lan
look
s at h
ow th
e M
PA/N
’’s
finan
cial
nee
ds w
ill b
e co
vere
d
2=Kn
ows b
est p
ract
ice a
nd h
as
expe
rienc
e in
pre
parin
g pl
an
1=Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s im
port
ance
of
havi
ng p
lan)
(M
ax p
oint
s=3)
F3-K
6. F
amili
arity
with
bu
dget
cycle
and
ob
ject
of e
xpen
ditu
res
Wha
t are
the
finan
cial n
eeds
for t
he M
PA/N
? Ar
e th
ese
item
s inc
lude
d in
the
budg
et?
De
scrib
e th
e pr
oces
s of d
isbur
sing,
acc
ount
ing
and
audi
ting
for M
PA/N
rela
ted
expe
nses
.
Know
s the
obj
ect o
f exp
endi
ture
s – P
erso
nal s
ervi
ces,
Mai
nten
ance
&
oper
atin
g ex
pens
es (e
.g. e
nfor
cem
ent t
o in
clude
litig
atio
n pr
oces
s, M
&E,
IEC,
ph
ysica
l str
uctu
re, e
tc.),
Cap
ital o
utla
y, o
ther
fina
ncia
l exp
ense
s Kn
ows t
he fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
and
the
inflo
w &
out
flow
of f
unds
for
the
MPA
/N (i
.e. N
atio
nal G
over
nmen
t Acc
ount
ing
Syst
em) –
Bud
getin
g,
Acco
untin
g, A
uditi
ng, C
ash
man
agem
ent,
Reve
nue
gene
ratio
n an
d Re
port
ing
3 =
Very
kno
wle
dgea
ble
(kno
ws
finan
cial n
eeds
and
can
spec
ify
budg
et cy
cle &
obj
ect o
f ex
pend
iture
s)
2 =
Know
ledg
eabl
e (in
com
plet
e kn
owle
dge
on b
udge
t cyc
le &
obj
ect
of e
xpen
ditu
res)
1
= Kn
ows o
nly
1 as
pect
0
= No
ans
wer
F3
-K7.
Effe
ctiv
e po
licie
s and
stra
tegi
es
to e
nsur
e fin
ancia
l and
lo
gist
ic su
ppor
t to
MPA
/Ns
Wha
t pol
icies
/str
ateg
ies s
houl
d be
in p
lace
to
ensu
re th
at fu
nds a
re p
rovi
ded
for t
he
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
MPA
/N?
Ar
e th
ese
bein
g im
plem
ente
d in
you
r MPA
/N?
If ye
s, cit
e w
hich
one
s.
Know
s the
pol
icies
that
shou
ld b
e in
pla
ce to
ens
ure
that
fund
s and
supp
ort
are
prov
ided
fund
ing
to th
e M
PA/N
(i.e
. pro
vide
s dire
ct fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt,
thro
ugh
ince
ntiv
es, f
ines
& p
enal
ties,
etc.
) •
Fish
erie
s Cod
e (R
.A. 1
0654
) •
For N
IPAS
– N
IPAS
Act
, Gen
eral
App
ropr
iatio
ns A
ct
• Ot
her r
even
ue-g
ener
atin
g po
licie
s ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
2= ca
n cit
e m
any
1=ca
n cit
e at
leas
t 1
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 4
F3
-S3.
Pre
para
tion
of
finan
ce-re
late
d pl
ans
Wha
t is y
our r
ole
in th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
fina
nce-
rela
ted
plan
s?
How
do
you
asse
ss/e
stim
ate
the
finan
cial
need
s of t
he M
PA/N
?
May
hav
e a
maj
or p
artic
ipat
ion
in th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
MPA
/N a
nnua
l fin
ancia
l or
bus
ines
s pla
n:
• Le
d th
e te
chni
cal w
orki
ng g
roup
(TW
G) th
at p
repa
res t
he fi
nanc
ial o
r bu
sines
s pla
n •
Mem
ber o
f the
TW
G th
at p
repa
res t
he fi
nanc
ial o
r bus
ines
s pla
n •
Atte
nded
the
wor
ksho
p &
par
ticip
ated
in th
e dr
aftin
g of
the
finan
cial o
r bu
sines
s pla
n M
inim
al p
artic
ipat
ion
• As
signe
d a
staf
f to
cond
uct a
wor
ksho
p to
dra
ft th
e fin
ancia
l pla
n •
Coor
dina
ted
and
orga
nize
d th
e w
orks
hop
on th
e dr
aftin
g of
the
finan
cial
plan
2 =
Part
icipa
ted
in d
rafti
ng p
lan
1
= M
inim
al p
artic
ipat
ion
0
= No
par
ticip
atio
n
4. C
ompe
tenc
y: A
dher
es to
the
finan
cial m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
in p
lace
F4
-K8.
Sta
ndar
ds,
norm
s and
bes
t pr
actic
es in
fina
ncia
l m
anag
emen
t
Wha
t are
som
e be
st p
ract
ices i
n M
PA/N
fin
ancia
l man
agem
ent t
hat y
ou k
now
of?
W
hat i
s the
pre
scrib
ed fi
nanc
ial r
epor
ting
that
yo
u fo
llow
?
Can
cite
a be
st p
ract
ice in
MPA
/N fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t Kn
ows t
he fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
and
the
inflo
w &
out
flow
of f
unds
for
the
MPA
/N (i
.e. N
atio
nal G
over
nmen
t Acc
ount
ing
Syst
em) –
Bud
getin
g,
Acco
untin
g, A
uditi
ng, C
ash
man
agem
ent,
Reve
nue
gene
ratio
n, R
epor
ting
2=Kn
ows m
any
1=Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
F4-S
4. F
inan
cial
man
agem
ent a
nd
docu
men
tatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
ensu
re th
at fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t (e
.g. b
udge
ting,
acc
ount
ing,
pro
cure
men
t of
good
s and
serv
ices,
etc.
) is t
imel
y an
d be
ing
follo
wed
pro
perly
? Ci
te so
me
inst
ance
s. Ho
w d
o yo
u en
sure
that
fund
s are
spen
t wise
ly
and
effic
ient
ly?
Know
s stra
tegi
es to
ens
ure
prop
er fi
nanc
ial m
anag
emen
t and
effe
ctiv
ely
&
effic
ient
ly u
se fu
nds (
i.e. p
rope
r bud
getin
g, a
ccou
ntin
g, a
uditi
ng, p
rocu
rem
ent,
etc.
) •
2=M
entio
ns se
vera
l str
ateg
ies
1=M
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0=
No a
nsw
er
F4-S
5. F
inan
cial
repo
rtin
g Ho
w d
o yo
u pr
epar
e yo
ur fi
nanc
ial r
epor
t?
How
do
you
pres
ent y
our f
inan
cial r
epor
ts?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
Know
s how
to p
repa
re fi
nanc
ial r
epor
ts
Know
s how
to p
rese
nt fi
nanc
ial s
tatu
s and
repo
rts
Mak
es su
re th
at fi
nanc
ial r
epor
ts a
re su
bmitt
ed o
n tim
e
2=M
entio
ns se
vera
l str
ateg
ies
1=M
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0=
N o a
nsw
er
5. C
ompe
tenc
y: M
anag
e an
d m
aint
ain
asse
ts a
nd e
quip
men
t F5
-K9.
Fam
iliar
ity w
ith
asse
ts, m
ater
ials
and
equi
pmen
t
Wha
t are
the
asse
ts, e
quip
men
t and
mat
eria
ls th
at y
ou h
ave
for t
he M
PA/N
and
thei
r use
s?
Do y
ou th
ink
thes
e ar
e su
fficie
nt fo
r the
ef
fect
ive
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N?
Know
s the
mat
eria
ls an
d eq
uipm
ent o
f the
offi
ce fo
r the
MPA
/N a
nd w
hat t
hey
sh
ould
be
used
for.
Can
also
thin
k of
or l
ist o
ther
mat
eria
ls an
d eq
uipm
ent t
hey
need
for t
he
effe
ctiv
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
2=Kn
ows m
any
1=Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
F5-K
10. P
rope
r m
aint
enan
ce,
inve
ntor
y an
d au
ditin
g pr
oced
ures
Wha
t are
the
appr
oved
pro
cedu
res f
or th
e in
vent
ory
and
mai
nten
ance
of e
quip
men
t and
as
sets
for t
he M
PA/N
?
Can
desc
ribe
the
proc
edur
es o
f the
ir of
fice
on in
vent
ory
and
mai
nten
ance
of
asse
ts a
nd e
quip
men
t
2=Kn
ows m
any
1=Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 5
F5
-S6.
Inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce sk
ills
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at a
ll eq
uipm
ent a
nd
mat
eria
ls ar
e ac
coun
ted
for?
Des
crib
e br
iefly
. Ha
ve y
ou a
tten
ded
trai
ning
s rel
ated
to
inve
ntor
y or
mai
nten
ance
of e
quip
men
t? Li
st
trai
ning
s rec
eive
d.
Can
desc
ribe
a sy
stem
for t
he o
rgan
izatio
n an
d ac
coun
ting
of m
ater
ials
and
equi
pmen
t Kn
ows h
ow to
mai
ntai
n m
ater
ials,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd p
hysic
al st
ruct
ures
in g
ood
cond
ition
and
whe
re to
hav
e th
em re
paire
d on
ce b
roke
n (o
r has
bee
n tr
aine
d)
1=Ca
n de
scrib
e a
syst
em
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus "
1", i
f has
bee
n tr
aine
d)
(Max
= 2
poi
nts)
COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
6.
Com
pete
ncy:
Pro
mot
e aw
aren
ess,
unde
rsta
ndin
g and
supp
ort o
f and
for t
he M
PA/N
syst
em a
nd it
s val
ues
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
C6-K
11. M
PA/N
in
form
atio
n th
at n
eeds
to
be
com
mun
icate
d w
ithin
and
out
side
the
man
agem
ent b
ody
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant
conc
epts
/info
rmat
ion
abou
t MPA
/Ns t
hat t
he
peop
le/c
omm
unity
shou
ld k
now
abo
ut?
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut th
e M
PA/N
in y
our a
rea?
Can
cite
impo
rtan
t inf
orm
atio
n ab
out t
he M
PA/N
that
shou
ld b
e co
mm
unica
ted
to th
e co
mm
unity
whi
ch co
uld
inclu
de th
e fo
llow
ing:
•
MPA
/N o
bjec
tives
(e.g
. fish
erie
s man
agem
ent,
biod
ivers
ity co
nser
vatio
n,
habi
tat p
rote
ctio
n, e
tc.)
• M
PA/N
thre
ats (
e.g.
ove
rfish
ing,
sedi
men
tatio
n, p
ollu
tion,
etc
.) •
Diffe
rent
mar
ine
habi
tats
(cor
al re
ef, s
eagr
ass,
man
grov
e)
• Im
port
ance
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
e.g.
pro
visio
ning
, reg
ulat
ing,
etc
.) •
Best
pra
ctice
s in
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t •
Law
s and
pol
icies
rela
ted
to co
asta
l and
mar
ine
envir
onm
ent a
nd
reso
urce
s •
Rule
s & re
gula
tions
; wha
t is a
llow
ed a
nd p
rohi
bite
d in
the
MPA
/N
• Co
mm
unity
invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e M
PA/N
2=kn
ows l
ots
1=kn
ows 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
C6-K
12.
Com
mun
icatio
n st
rate
gies
Wha
t are
you
r com
mun
icatio
n st
rate
gies
? Gi
ve
exam
ples
. Is
ther
e a
mec
hani
sm fo
r the
gen
eral
pub
lic to
be
cons
isten
tly, e
ffect
ivel
y an
d pr
oact
ivel
y in
form
ed a
bout
MPA
/N p
rogr
ams a
nd
activ
ities
? If
yes,
cite
som
e ex
ampl
es.
Vario
us co
mm
unica
tion
stra
tegi
es m
ay b
e gi
ven
such
as:
•
Adve
rtisi
ng (T
V, R
adio
, Pos
ters
) •
Pres
s Con
fere
nces
•
Trad
ition
al a
rts/
Com
mun
ity D
ialo
gue
• In
tern
et a
nd so
cial m
edia
•
SMS/
Mob
ile p
hone
•
Volu
ntee
r/ co
mm
unity
eve
nts
• M
erch
andi
se d
istrib
utio
n •
Spec
ial e
vent
s (to
wn
fest
ival
s, co
ntes
ts, f
un ru
ns)
• In
clusio
n in
scho
ol cu
rricu
lum
or t
hrou
gh IE
Cs a
nd o
ther
act
iviti
es
cond
ucte
d in
scho
ol o
r with
stud
ents
2=kn
ows l
ots
1=kn
ows 1
0=
N o a
nsw
er
C6-S
7. M
essa
ge a
nd
mat
eria
ls de
velo
pmen
t Ho
w d
o yo
u de
velo
p m
essa
ges f
or y
our I
EC
mat
eria
ls fo
r the
MPA
/N (e
.g. t
rans
latio
n,
cont
ent)?
Ho
w d
o yo
u de
velo
p, d
esig
n an
d pr
oduc
e th
e m
ater
ials
to b
e us
ed in
com
mun
icatio
n ac
tiviti
es fo
r the
MPA
/N?
Thes
e ar
e so
me
of th
e pr
oces
ses h
e/sh
e m
ight
go
thro
ugh
to d
evel
op th
e m
essa
ge/s
and
mat
eria
ls ne
eded
for t
heir
MPA
/N:
• Co
nduc
t situ
atio
nal a
naly
sis
• Id
entif
y iss
ues
• Re
visit
com
mun
icatio
n ob
ject
ives
•
Perfo
rm a
nd re
view
resu
lts o
f aud
ienc
e an
alys
is •
Pret
estin
g of
key
mes
sage
•
Revi
sion
of k
ey m
essa
ge
2 =
Men
tions
seve
ral s
trat
egie
s 1
= M
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0
= No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f has
att
ende
d 1-
2 tr
aini
ngs;
pl
us “2
”, if
has
att
ende
d m
ore
than
2
trai
ning
s)
(Max
=4 p
oint
s)
Page
| 6
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ng/s
rela
ted
to IE
C m
essa
ge d
evel
opm
ent?
If y
es, n
ame
the
trai
ning
s.
• Co
nten
t cre
atio
n &
tran
slatio
n •
Perfo
rm a
nd re
view
resu
lts o
f aud
ienc
e an
alys
is •
Iden
tifica
tion
of co
mm
unica
tion
met
hod
(indi
vidu
al, g
roup
, med
iate
d,
mas
s)
• Id
entif
icatio
n of
com
mun
icatio
n ch
anne
l (SM
S, p
oste
rs, l
ive
anno
unce
men
t, so
cial m
edia
, boo
ks, m
anua
ls, e
tc.)
They
coul
d be
in v
ario
us fo
rms:
Man
ual –
han
d dr
awn/
pai
nted
or m
ixed
med
ia
or d
igita
l (Ph
oto,
Vid
eo, a
nd La
yout
Sof
twar
e) a
nd h
e/sh
e m
ight
be
skill
ed se
lf-ta
ught
or t
rain
ed o
n ba
sic/ f
ree
softw
are
(e.g
. Pai
nt, C
anva
, Micr
osof
t PPT
etc
.),
inte
rmed
iate
(Pho
to m
anip
ulat
ion
and
editi
ng, t
ext l
ayou
t) or
adv
ance
d (T
ext
and
phot
o la
yout
, gra
phics
crea
tion,
vid
eo e
ditin
g).
C6-S
8. E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
com
mun
icate
with
the
mem
bers
of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y so
that
you
r id
eas f
or th
e M
PA/N
pla
n (d
evel
opm
ent,
upda
ting)
and
its i
mpl
emen
tatio
n w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
/inclu
ded?
Ho
w d
o yo
u co
mm
unica
te w
ith th
e st
akeh
olde
rs to
pro
mot
e th
eir a
war
enes
s and
su
ppor
t tow
ards
the
MPA
/N?
He/s
he ca
n de
scrib
e m
any
way
s and
met
hods
to co
mm
unica
te w
ith m
embe
rs
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y an
d th
e st
akeh
olde
rs, t
hese
coul
d in
volv
e ho
me
visit
s an
d fa
ce-to
-face
dia
logu
e or
in m
ore
form
al se
ttin
gs su
ch a
s mee
tings
, tra
inin
gs
and
focu
s gro
up d
iscus
sions
(FGD
s) o
r thr
ough
socia
l med
ia, S
MS
as w
ell a
s ba
nner
, bill
boar
d, p
rinte
d m
ater
ials
(pos
ters
, bro
chur
e, p
amph
let),
ed
ucat
iona
l mat
eria
ls (m
anua
l, m
odul
e, b
ooks
), au
dio-
visu
al (v
ideo
s, fil
ms)
; an
d ot
her i
nter
activ
e an
d im
agin
ativ
e w
ays s
uch
as fo
lk m
edia
, mas
cot,
skits
an
d pl
ays,
etc.
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l way
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
C6-S
9. C
oord
inat
ion
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u en
gage
with
mem
bers
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y? W
hy d
id y
ou
enga
ge w
ith th
em?
How
do
you
enga
ge w
ith st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd
othe
r age
ncie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
M
PA/N
? W
hy d
id y
ou e
ngag
e w
ith th
em?
Can
desc
ribe
how
he/
she
coor
dina
tes w
ith m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
cite
exam
ples
of h
is/he
r int
erac
tions
with
them
. Thi
s co
uld
inclu
de a
ctiv
ities
such
as:
•
Draf
ting
or u
pdat
ing
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
• A p
prov
al o
f the
man
agem
ent p
lan
• Te
am-b
uild
ing
• De
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an
• En
forc
emen
t pla
nnin
g an
d m
onito
ring
Ca
n de
scrib
e ho
w h
e/sh
e co
ordi
nate
s with
MPA
/N st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd o
ther
ag
encie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N a
nd ci
te e
xam
ples
of h
is/he
r in
tera
ctio
ns w
ith th
em. P
ossib
le re
ason
s for
eng
agem
ent c
an b
e:
• Se
ek su
ppor
t (fu
ndin
g, te
chni
cal a
ssist
ance
, etc
.)
• De
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an
• Pr
oduc
tion
of IE
C m
ater
ials
• En
cour
age
part
icipa
tion
and
supp
ort f
or M
PA/N
•
Join
t enf
orce
men
t
2=ca
n de
scrib
e ho
w h
e co
ordi
nate
s w
ith th
em
1=kn
ows o
nly
1 0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s 1, i
f kno
ws w
hy h
e en
gage
s with
th
em
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
C6-S
10. P
eopl
e sk
ills
Desc
ribe
your
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
with
, (1)
m
embe
rs o
f the
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
(2)
stak
ehol
ders
.
Can
desc
ribe
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
(whe
ther
pos
itive
, clo
se a
nd e
ffect
ive)
with
m
embe
rs o
f man
agem
ent b
ody
as w
ell a
s sta
keho
lder
s
2=ca
n de
scrib
e w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
ps
1=kn
ows o
nly
1 0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if h
as st
rate
gy o
n ho
w to
ha
ndle
conf
licts
and
disa
gree
men
ts)
Page
| 7
How
do
you
hand
le d
isagr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
or M
PA/N
man
agem
ent
body
?
Has s
trat
egie
s to
reso
lve
conf
licts
and
disa
gree
men
ts a
mon
g m
embe
rs o
f the
M
PA/N
man
agem
ent b
ody
– w
hich
may
be
done
thro
ugh
form
al a
nd in
form
al
mee
tings
and
com
mun
icatio
ns a
nd ca
n cit
e in
stan
ces w
hen
thes
e ha
ppen
ed
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
FUNC
TION
: ENF
ORCE
MEN
T 7.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
prev
entio
n an
d de
tect
ion
of il
lega
l act
iviti
es
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
E7-K
13. L
aws r
elat
ed to
th
e M
PA/N
W
hat p
ertin
ent n
atio
nal l
aws,
loca
l ord
inan
ces
and
othe
r iss
uanc
es re
late
d to
MPA
/Ns t
hat
you
know
of?
W
hat a
re th
e pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
act
iviti
es
in y
our M
PA/N
?
He m
ay g
ive
the
spec
ific o
rdin
ance
s ena
cted
for t
he M
PA/N
in th
e ar
ea, o
r the
la
w th
at w
as p
asse
d sp
ecifi
c for
the
NIPA
S as
wel
l as t
he W
ildlif
e Ac
t, am
ende
d Fi
sher
ies L
aw, R
A 11
038
(ENI
PAS
Law
), an
d ot
her l
ocal
/mun
icipa
l/pro
vinc
ial
ordi
nanc
es th
at h
ave
been
pas
sed
whi
ch a
re re
late
d to
the
MPA
/N.
Can
men
tion
activ
ities
that
are
pro
hibi
ted
in th
e M
PA/N
: -
fishi
ng in
side
the
proh
ibite
d zo
ne o
r NO
TAKE
ZON
E; in
trusio
n in
to th
e re
gula
ted
zone
; fish
ing
usin
g un
auth
orize
d ge
ar, d
ynam
ite o
r poi
son
and
noxio
us su
bsta
nces
; bui
ldin
g Ill
egal
stru
ctur
es; p
ollu
tion;
colle
ctio
n of
m
arin
e or
gani
sms;
dum
ping
of g
arba
ge; c
olle
ctio
n of
sam
ples
or m
arin
e or
gani
sms f
or sa
le; h
untin
g or
capt
ure
of e
ndan
gere
d m
arin
e or
gani
sms;
tour
ism a
ctiv
ities
in p
rohi
bite
d zo
nes,
and
man
y ot
hers
) An
d ac
tiviti
es th
at a
re a
llow
ed in
the
MPA
/N:
recr
eatio
nal d
ivin
g in
des
igna
ted
zone
, res
earc
h, n
avig
atio
n, e
tc.
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l law
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if a
ble
to m
entio
n pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
act
iviti
es)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
E7-K
14. E
nfor
cem
ent
plan
ning
W
hat w
as y
our r
ole
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he
enfo
rcem
ent p
lan
for t
he M
PA/N
? De
scrib
e th
e m
ajor
com
pone
nts a
nd st
rate
gies
in
the
enfo
rcem
ent p
lan.
Invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of e
nfor
cem
ent p
lan:
•
High
ly in
volv
ed (a
nd ca
n de
scrib
e pr
oces
s of d
evel
opm
ent)
• M
oder
atel
y in
volv
ed
• Lit
tle in
volv
emen
t (e.
g. si
gnin
g in
vitat
ion
lett
ers,
etc.
) •
No in
volv
emen
t at a
ll
Step
s in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Enf
orce
men
t Pla
n (m
ay b
ecom
e co
mpo
nent
s):
• Po
licy
and
inst
itutio
nal r
evie
w
• Si
tuat
iona
l Ana
lysis
(iss
ue m
appi
ng)
• Id
entif
icatio
n of
enf
orce
rs
• De
fine
stra
tegi
es
• De
velo
p pl
an o
f act
ion
• M
onito
r and
eva
luat
e •
Refin
e an
d am
end
stra
tegi
es
• Up
date
bas
elin
e in
form
atio
n
3=le
ader
ship
/ m
ain
role
, 2=
help
ed d
raft
with
oth
ers
1=m
inim
al p
artic
ipat
ion
0=no
ne
Page
| 8
E7
-K15
. Cha
lleng
es to
en
forc
emen
t W
hat a
re th
e ch
alle
nges
and
bar
riers
in
enfo
rcem
ent (
e.g.
socio
-cul
tura
l, po
litica
l, ec
onom
ic, e
tc.)?
Ho
w d
o yo
u ad
dres
s/re
solv
e th
em?
Can
cite
spec
ific c
halle
nges
in a
rea
and
disc
uss h
ow th
ese
wer
e ad
dres
sed
or
reso
lved
Ch
alle
nges
and
bar
riers
in e
nfor
cem
ent:
• So
ciocu
ltura
l bar
riers
in th
e ar
ea –
Exis
ting
cust
omar
y la
ws/
loca
l rul
es
and
regu
latio
ns; T
radi
tiona
l die
ts (c
onsu
mpt
ion
of p
rote
cted
thre
aten
ed
spec
ies)
; Pol
itica
l int
erve
ntio
n •
Polit
ical b
arrie
rs in
the
area
– P
arty
affi
liatio
n; P
atro
nage
; War
ds a
nd
vote
rs
• Ec
onom
ic ba
rrie
rs in
the
area
– Li
velih
ood;
Bus
ines
s int
eres
ts; F
iscal
lim
itatio
ns
• Te
chni
cal b
arrie
rs in
the
area
– Ju
risdi
ctio
ns; I
mpo
undm
ent;
Evid
ence
(s
pecie
s exa
min
atio
n); D
eten
tion
• Te
chno
logi
cal b
arrie
rs in
the
area
– E
quip
men
t and
infra
stru
ctur
es; G
loba
l Po
sitio
ning
Sys
tem
; Pat
rol b
oats
•
Inst
itutio
nal b
arrie
rs in
the
area
– T
urfin
g; C
ompe
titio
ns; P
roxim
ity; L
ack
of ca
pacit
y; F
iscal
prio
ritie
s St
rate
gies
to a
ddre
ss/ r
esol
ve ch
alle
nges
can
inclu
de:
• Ca
pacit
y de
velo
pmen
t •
Com
mun
ity co
nsul
tatio
ns a
nd p
artic
ipat
ion
• Sh
ared
enf
orce
men
t •
Acqu
isitio
n of
equ
ipm
ent/
mat
eria
ls
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if s
olut
ion
prov
ided
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
E7-S
11. A
naly
tical
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u kn
ow if
the
enfo
rcem
ent
stra
tegi
es e
mpl
oyed
are
app
ropr
iate
and
ef
fect
ive?
Ho
w d
o yo
u ad
apt o
r adj
ust?
The
mos
t com
mon
tool
s to
anal
yse
info
rmat
ion
rela
ted
to e
nfor
cem
ent a
re
iden
tifica
tion
of st
reng
ths,
wea
knes
ses,
oppo
rtun
ities
and
thre
ats o
r SW
OT
anal
ysis
and
scen
ario
pla
nnin
g w
hich
invo
lves
fore
cast
ing
futu
re e
vent
s usin
g a
set o
f ass
umpt
ions
. Can
des
crib
e w
hy su
ch st
rate
gies
are
use
d an
d if
they
are
ef
fect
ive/
appr
opria
te.
2=m
entio
ns se
vera
l str
ateg
ies
1=m
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0=
no a
nsw
er
E7-S
12. E
nfor
cem
ent
skill
s rel
ated
to
prev
entio
n an
d de
tect
ion
How
do
you
prev
ent a
nd d
etec
t ille
gal
activ
ities
? Ci
te e
xam
ples
. Ha
ve y
ou a
tten
ded
trai
ning
s rel
ated
to th
e pr
even
tion
and
dete
ctio
n of
ille
gal a
ctiv
ities
? Na
me
the
trai
ning
s.
Prev
entio
n &
det
ectio
n ca
n be
thro
ugh
regu
lar p
atro
lling
, IEC
cam
paig
ns,
trai
ning
for e
nfor
cers
, oth
ers
2 =
Men
tions
seve
ral s
trat
egie
s 1
= M
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0
= No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f has
att
ende
d 1-
2 tr
aini
ngs;
pl
us “2
”, if
has
att
ende
d m
ore
than
2
trai
ning
s)
(Max
=4 p
oint
s)
8. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
nsur
e ef
fect
ive
and
prop
er a
ppre
hens
ion
of su
spec
ts a
nd vi
olat
ors
E8-K
16. D
etai
led
know
ledg
e on
pe
nalti
es a
nd fi
nes
acco
rdin
g to
law
s and
or
dina
nces
Wha
t are
the
fines
and
pen
altie
s of p
rohi
bite
d ac
tiviti
es in
you
r MPA
/N a
s ind
icate
d in
ex
istin
g la
ws a
nd o
rdin
ance
s?
The
answ
er to
this
will
tell
of h
is kn
owle
dge
of th
e sp
ecifi
c fin
es a
nd p
enal
ties
impo
sed
on v
iola
tions
as w
ritte
n in
the
ordi
nanc
e/ la
w fo
r the
ir M
PA/N
.
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 9
E8
-K17
. Pro
per
appr
ehen
sion
proc
edur
es
Desc
ribe
the
gene
ral a
ppre
hens
ion
proc
edur
es
for v
iola
tors
in y
our M
PA/N
. Is t
his c
lear
ly
stat
ed in
the
enfo
rcem
ent p
lan?
W
hat i
s you
r rol
e in
the
appr
ehen
sion
stag
e of
M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t?
Arre
st, s
earc
h, se
izure
and
det
entio
n (A
SSD)
refe
rs to
act
iviti
es d
one
befo
re
pros
ecut
ion
for t
he p
urpo
se o
f est
ablis
hing
pro
babl
e ca
use,
if n
ot th
e gu
ilt, o
f th
e ac
cuse
d. A
rres
t is t
he ta
king
of a
per
son
into
cust
ody
so h
e m
ay a
nsw
er
char
ges f
or a
n of
fens
e. A
ll th
is in
form
atio
n m
ust b
e cle
arly
writ
ten
in th
e M
PA/N
Enf
orce
men
t Pla
n.
Polic
e of
ficer
s, of
ficer
s cha
rged
with
the
enfo
rcem
ent o
f coa
stal
law
s, or
de
putiz
ed fi
sh w
arde
ns m
ay co
nduc
t an
arre
st. W
arra
ntle
ss a
rres
ts a
re
com
mon
in co
asta
l law
enf
orce
men
t whe
re v
iola
tors
are
ofte
n ab
oard
a
spee
ding
ves
sel t
hat c
an e
asily
get
aw
ay. W
arra
ntle
ss a
rres
ts a
re v
alid
in th
e fo
llow
ing
inst
ance
s: (1
) whi
le th
e of
fens
e in
bei
ng co
mm
itted
– p
erso
n is
caug
ht fi
shin
g in
side
MPA
; dyn
amite
is se
en in
side
fishi
ng v
esse
l of a
fis
herm
an; a
ctua
l bla
st fi
shin
g; (2
) whe
n th
e of
fens
e ha
s jus
t bee
n co
mm
itted
A
Mira
nda
War
ning
is g
iven
and
the
occa
sion
whe
n th
is w
as d
one
shou
ld b
e in
clude
d in
the
affid
avit.
Mira
nda
Righ
ts sh
ould
be
expl
aine
d to
the
pers
on in
a
lang
uage
or d
iale
ct u
nder
stoo
d by
him
.
2=Kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No
answ
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s rol
e)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
E8-S
13. E
nfor
cem
ent
skill
s rel
ated
to
appr
ehen
sion
Wha
t are
the
step
s tha
t you
follo
w w
hen
you
appr
ehen
d so
meo
ne?
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
the
appr
ehen
sion
of su
spec
ted
viol
ator
s? N
ame
the
trai
ning
s.
By b
eing
wel
l-ver
sed
with
the
law
and
ord
inan
ces r
elat
ed to
the
MPA
/N; i
ts
proh
ibite
d ac
ts, f
ines
and
pen
altie
s; as
wel
l as t
he p
roto
col w
hen
cond
uctin
g en
forc
emen
t and
arr
est.
Trai
ning
s and
refre
sher
cour
ses o
n en
forc
emen
t are
ne
eded
for t
his.
2=Kn
ows c
orre
ct st
eps
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if h
as tr
aini
ng)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
9.
Com
pete
ncy:
Doc
umen
tatio
n an
d fe
edba
ck o
f enf
orce
men
t act
iviti
es
E9-K
18. B
asic
docu
men
tatio
n fo
r en
forc
emen
t pr
oced
ures
Wha
t is t
he p
roce
ss o
f doc
umen
tatio
n of
en
forc
emen
t act
iviti
es?
Wha
t are
the
docu
men
tatio
n re
quire
men
ts
need
ed in
app
rehe
nsio
n?
Docu
men
tatio
n is
very
impo
rtan
t in
enfo
rcem
ent –
succ
essf
ul p
rose
cutio
n is
due
to th
e pr
esen
ce o
f evi
denc
e w
hich
will
est
ablis
h th
e tru
th a
nd p
rove
fact
s to
the
cour
ts a
nd q
uasi-
judi
cial b
odie
s (su
ch a
s adm
inist
rativ
e bo
dies
that
may
al
so d
ecid
e on
case
s).
Ev
iden
ce ca
n be
clas
sifie
d as
: 1.
Obj
ect o
r rea
l evi
denc
e –
tang
ible
whi
ch ca
n be
exh
ibite
d or
dem
onst
rate
d by
exa
min
atio
n or
vie
win
g (e
.g. f
ish sa
mpl
es w
hich
can
be fu
rthe
r exa
min
ed
for u
se o
f exp
losiv
es/p
oiso
n/po
llutio
n, fi
shin
g ge
ar a
nd v
esse
ls)
2. D
ocum
enta
ry e
vide
nce
– w
ritte
n in
stru
men
ts o
r doc
umen
ts su
ch a
s per
mits
an
d lic
ense
s, in
vent
ory
and
seizu
re re
ceip
ts, a
nd p
hoto
s. Th
e ad
miss
ibili
ty o
f ph
otos
is d
eter
min
ed b
y its
acc
urac
y in
por
tray
ing
esse
nce
of cr
ime.
Pho
tos
are
very
hel
pful
to co
rrob
orat
e ev
iden
ce o
f fish
ery
viol
atio
ns –
pho
tos o
f fis
hery
pro
duct
s sei
zed;
pho
tos o
f ord
erly
cond
uct o
f the
arr
est,
sear
ch o
r se
izure
to n
egat
e al
lega
tions
of p
lant
ing
of e
vide
nce;
pho
tos o
f net
with
ru
ler t
o in
dica
te si
ze
3. T
estim
onia
l evi
denc
e –
test
imon
y or
dep
ositi
on o
f a w
itnes
s (e.
g. te
stim
ony
of th
e ap
preh
endi
ng te
am, d
epos
ition
of w
itnes
ses)
.
2=Kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 1
0
Affid
avits
of a
rres
t, se
arch
and
seizu
re sh
ould
be
prep
ared
as s
oon
as p
ossib
le.
Lega
l For
ms/
Doc
umen
ts: C
ompl
aint
for P
relim
inar
y In
vest
igat
ion,
Join
t Af
fidav
it of
Witn
esse
s, Af
fidav
it of
Arr
est;
War
rant
of A
rres
t, Ap
preh
ensio
n Re
port
, Boo
king
She
et a
nd A
rres
t Rep
ort;
Sear
ch W
arra
nt, B
oard
ing
Cert
ifica
te,
Inve
ntor
y Re
port
of C
onfis
cate
d Ar
ticle
s, Re
ceip
ts o
f Con
fisca
ted
Fish
/ Co
nfisc
ated
Gea
r/ F
ish S
ampl
es T
aken
/ Im
poun
ded
Boat
/ Ite
ms f
or T
empo
rary
Cu
stod
y/ b
y Ho
spita
ls or
Pen
al In
stitu
tions
of C
onfis
cate
d Fi
sh.
E9
-K19
. Det
ails
of le
gal
proc
esse
s De
scrib
e th
e pr
oces
s for
filin
g ca
ses a
gain
st
appr
ehen
ded
viol
ator
s, i.e
. fili
ng th
e po
lice
repo
rt o
r blo
tter;
Cour
t pro
cedu
res?
Can
desc
ribe
in d
etai
l the
pro
cess
(Rul
es o
n Cr
imin
al P
roce
dure
) – co
mpl
aint
fil
ed fo
r vio
latio
ns o
f fish
ery
law
s, ru
les,
regu
latio
ns a
nd o
rdin
ance
s by
offic
ers
from
the
PN, P
CG, P
NP, B
anta
y Da
gat,
fish
war
dens
, etc
. with
in th
e pr
escr
iptiv
e pe
riod
in th
e co
urt o
r pro
secu
tor’s
offi
ce w
ith th
e pr
oper
juris
dict
ion
(MTC
, RT
C, S
andi
ganb
ayan
). A
prel
imin
ary
inve
stig
atio
n (P
I) is
cond
ucte
d be
fore
the
com
plai
nt is
file
d in
cour
t by
pros
ecut
or. W
hen
accu
sed
is la
wfu
lly a
rres
ted
with
out w
arra
nt th
e co
mpl
aint
may
be
filed
with
out P
I and
an
inqu
est
inve
stig
atio
n is
cond
ucte
d in
stea
d. O
ther
cour
t pro
cedu
res f
ollo
w a
fter t
he
inve
stig
atio
n. A
ffida
vits
and
oth
er fo
rms o
f evi
denc
es/ d
ocum
ents
gat
here
d du
ring
the
cour
se o
f inv
estig
atio
n w
ill b
e su
bmitt
ed.
A pe
rson
und
er cu
stod
ial i
nves
tigat
ion
has t
he M
irand
a Ri
ghts
: •
Righ
t to
rem
ain
silen
t •
Righ
t to
a co
unse
l of h
is ow
n ch
oice
•
Righ
t to
be fu
rnish
ed w
ith a
n in
depe
nden
t cou
nsel
by
the
Stat
e if
he
cann
ot a
fford
one
•
Righ
t to
be in
form
ed o
f the
se ri
ghts
If
a pe
rson
und
er cu
stod
ial i
nves
tigat
ion
mak
es a
n ad
miss
ion
or co
nfes
sion,
but
he
was
NOT
info
rmed
of h
is rig
hts,
his a
dmiss
ion
will
NOT
be
adm
issib
le. T
he
adm
issio
n m
ust b
e m
ade
in w
ritin
g, si
gned
by
him
in th
e pr
esen
ce o
f his
coun
sel.
2=Kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 1
1
MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
10. C
ompe
tenc
y: C
ondu
ct o
f mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion(
M&
E)
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
M10
-K20
. M
PA/
Netw
ork
obje
ctiv
es
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
MPA
/N?
Wha
t ind
icato
r/s n
eed
to b
e m
onito
red
to
dete
rmin
e if
thes
e ob
ject
ives
are
bei
ng m
et?
Know
s the
obj
ectiv
es &
indi
cato
rs o
f the
MPA
/N w
hich
can
inclu
de:
• Sus
tain
able
fish
erie
s – in
crea
sed
fish
stoc
k (b
iom
ass,
abun
danc
e);
incr
ease
d fis
h ca
tch
(CPU
E); i
ncre
ased
/mai
ntai
ned
larv
al
supp
ly/r
ecru
itmen
t; ab
senc
e/de
crea
se o
f ille
gal/d
estru
ctiv
e fis
hing
pr
actic
es
• Bio
dive
rsity
cons
erva
tion
– pr
otec
tion
of cr
itica
l hab
itats
; mai
ntai
ned
ecol
ogica
l con
nect
ivity
; im
prov
ed st
atus
of t
hrea
tene
d sp
ecie
s; im
prov
ed
popu
latio
n siz
e • C
limat
e ch
ange
ada
ptat
ion
– pr
otec
tion
of re
silie
nt a
reas
; pro
tect
ion
of
criti
cal h
abita
ts; p
rote
ctio
n sim
ilar h
abita
ts a
long
env
ironm
enta
l gra
dien
t; re
duce
d th
reat
s; en
hanc
e ec
olog
ical c
onne
ctiv
ity
• Int
er-L
GU a
llian
ce –
Mem
oran
dum
of A
gree
men
ts; h
arm
onize
d CR
M
rela
ted
ordi
nanc
es; j
oint
enf
orce
men
t • E
coto
urism
– e
quita
ble
bene
fits;
incr
ease
d in
com
e • P
rote
ctio
n of
thre
aten
ed sp
ecie
s – im
prov
ed st
atus
of t
hrea
tene
d sp
ecie
s; im
prov
ed p
opul
atio
n siz
e • S
ocia
l net
wor
k –
incr
ease
d co
llabo
ratio
ns; s
harin
g of
exp
ertis
e an
d re
sour
ces;
exch
ange
of k
now
ledg
e
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l obj
ectiv
es
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1 o
bjec
tive
0= N
o an
swer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f kno
ws i
ndica
tors
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
M10
-K21
. MPA
/N
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
prog
ram
Wha
t is m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n an
d w
hy is
it
impo
rtan
t?
Does
you
r MPA
/N h
ave
a M
&E
prog
ram
? If
yes,
wha
t was
you
r inv
olve
men
t in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
Can
expl
ain
wha
t is b
eing
mon
itore
d an
d ev
alua
ted
whi
ch m
ay in
clude
the
stat
us o
f man
agem
ent e
ffect
iven
ess;
com
pete
nce/
capa
city
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bo
dy; s
tatu
s of c
oast
al a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces;
as w
ell a
s soc
ioec
onom
ic fa
ctor
s M
&E
is do
ne fo
r the
follo
win
g re
ason
s: •
To d
eter
min
e ef
fect
iven
ess o
f act
iviti
es in
ach
ievi
ng g
oals
and
obje
ctiv
es
• Fo
r dec
ision
mak
ing
and
plan
ning
of a
ctiv
ity
• Ca
n be
use
d as
bas
is fo
r tra
inin
gs/w
orks
hops
Ca
n di
scus
s lev
el o
f inv
olve
men
t, if
any,
on
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M&
E pr
ogra
m
2=ve
ry k
now
ledg
eabl
e (s
ever
al it
ems /
re
ason
s not
ed)
1=m
entio
ns a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
M10
-K22
. Com
pone
nts
of th
e M
&E
prog
ram
-
Perfo
rman
ce M
&E
-
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M&
E -
Socio
-eco
nom
ic M
&E
Wha
t are
the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of y
our M
&E
prog
ram
?
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f eac
h co
mpo
nent
?
The
M&
E pr
ogra
m u
sual
ly h
as m
any
com
pone
nts a
nd ca
n in
clude
the
follo
win
g co
mpo
nent
s, ob
ject
ives
and
tool
s to
mea
sure
them
: •
Perfo
rman
ce &
effe
ctiv
enes
s of m
anag
emen
t bod
y –
impr
ove
capa
city
and
com
pete
nce
of m
anag
emen
t bod
y, F
inan
cial s
usta
inab
ility
, Bud
get
allo
catio
ns, C
olla
bora
tion
with
oth
er st
akeh
olde
rs, A
dopt
ion
of o
rdin
ance
s su
ppor
ting
MPA
/N
▪ TO
OLS:
MEA
T, M
ETT,
NEA
T, e
tc.
• Ec
olog
ical/
biop
hysic
al –
mon
itor c
hang
es in
fish
bio
mas
s and
den
sity
(incr
ease
d/m
aint
aine
d), I
ncre
ased
/mai
ntai
ned
seag
rass
, man
grov
e an
d co
ral c
over
s; Pr
otec
tion
of cr
itica
l hab
itats
▪
TOOL
S: H
abita
t mon
itorin
g th
roug
h va
rious
met
hods
fish
visu
al
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l com
pone
nts,
obje
ctiv
es +
tool
s 1=
can
men
tion
1 co
mpo
nent
, ob
ject
ive,
at l
east
, with
or w
ithou
t too
l 0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 1
2
cens
us, t
rans
ect s
urve
ys w
ith p
hoto
quad
rats
or L
IT, R
eef C
heck
, et
c.
• So
cio-e
cono
mic
– in
crea
sed
inco
me,
incr
ease
d so
cial g
roup
s •
TOOL
S: la
nded
catc
h su
rvey
, mar
ket s
urve
y, S
EAT,
fish
catc
h m
onito
ring
(CPU
E)
M10
-K23
. Ind
icato
rs
used
in M
&E
- Pe
rform
ance
M&
E -
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M&
E -
Socio
-eco
nom
ic M
&E
Wha
t are
the
indi
cato
rs th
at y
ou m
onito
r for
ea
ch o
f the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of y
our M
&E
prog
ram
? In
the
tabl
e on
the
right
, che
ck th
e in
dica
tors
th
at y
ou u
se a
nd sp
ecify
how
ofte
n th
ey a
re
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Acro
nym
s use
d:
MEA
T –
MPA
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess A
sses
smen
t To
ol
MET
T –
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess T
rack
ing
Tool
NE
AT –
Net
wor
k Ef
fect
iven
ess A
sses
smen
t Too
l CP
UE –
Cat
ch p
er u
nit e
ffort
Chec
k th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify h
ow o
ften
they
are
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Indi
cato
rs
Chec
k if
mon
itore
d Sc
hedu
le o
f m
onito
ring
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A.
Leve
l & ra
ting
(MEA
T)
B. S
core
(MET
T)
C. Le
vel &
ratin
g (N
EAT)
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL
A. %
live
cora
l cov
er
B. F
ish b
iom
ass (
tons
/sqk
m)
C. %
seag
rass
cove
r or d
ensit
y
D.
Num
ber o
f spe
cies:
1.
Fish
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
E. %
man
grov
e ca
nopy
cove
r
F.
Tot
al a
rea
(hec
tare
s)
1. C
oral
reef
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
G. M
arin
e m
amm
al si
ghtin
gs &
m
orta
litie
s (sp
ecie
s)
H. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A. H
ouse
hold
inco
me
B. F
ish ca
tch
(CPU
E)
C. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
2=ve
ry k
now
ledg
eabl
e (c
heck
s sev
eral
ite
ms)
1=
men
tions
at l
east
1
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, w
ith sc
hedu
le o
f mon
itorin
g in
dica
ted)
(M
ax p
oint
s=3)
Page
| 1
3
M10
-S14
. Effe
ctiv
ely
cond
uct M
&E
surv
eys
Do y
ou co
nduc
t M&
E su
rvey
s (i.e
. pe
rform
ance
, soc
io-e
cono
mic,
eco
logi
cal)?
Ha
ve y
ou re
ceiv
ed a
ny tr
aini
ngs o
n M
PA/N
M
&E?
List
trai
ning
s rec
eive
d.
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls
on a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht. U
se
scal
e be
low
. SC
ALE:
0
– No
ne
1 –
With
trai
ning
/ has
ass
isted
a fe
w ti
mes
2
– Ca
n pe
rform
with
min
imum
supe
rvisi
on
3 –
Can
perfo
rm in
depe
nden
tly
4 –
Can
supe
rvise
a g
roup
Ac
rony
ms u
sed:
CP
CE –
Cor
al p
oint
coun
t with
Exc
el e
xten
sions
SE
AT –
Soc
io-e
cono
mic
Asse
ssm
ent T
ool
SocM
on –
Soc
ioec
onom
ic M
onito
ring
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox u
sing
the
indi
cate
d sc
ale
(see
left
colu
mn)
.
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
skill
s 0
1 2
3 4
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A. M
EAT
B.
MET
T
C. N
EAT
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL/ B
IOPH
YSIC
AL
A.
Cor
al re
ef a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
1. M
anta
tow
2
. Lin
e in
terc
ept t
rans
ect (
LIT)
3
. Pho
toqu
adra
t &CP
CE
4. F
ish v
isual
cens
us (F
VC)
5. R
eef C
heck
B. S
eagr
ass a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
C.
Sea
wee
d as
sess
men
t & m
onito
ring
D.
Bea
ch fo
rest
ass
essm
ent &
mon
itorin
g
E. In
vert
ebra
te a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
F.
Cet
acea
n id
entif
icatio
n/ su
rvey
G. M
arin
e tu
rtle
iden
tifica
tion/
surv
ey
H.
Sea
bird
surv
ey
I.
Othe
r (pl
s. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A.
SEA
T
B. S
ocM
on
B.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
2=hi
ghly
-ski
lled
(che
cks 2
or m
ore
item
s)
1=le
ss sk
illed
(che
cks o
nly
1)
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, w
ith tr
aini
ngs)
(M
ax p
oint
s=3)
Page
| 1
4
11. C
ompe
tenc
y: P
repa
ratio
n of
repo
rts b
ased
on
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
resu
lts a
nd fe
edba
ck a
ctiv
ities
M
11-K
24. M
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n re
sults
W
hy is
it im
port
ant t
o re
port
M&
E re
sults
? W
hat s
houl
d be
pre
sent
ed a
nd in
clude
d in
the
M&
E re
port
s?
M&
E re
sults
can
be u
sed
for l
earn
ing;
for d
ecisi
on m
akin
g an
d pl
anni
ng fo
r ad
ditio
nal a
ctiv
ities
and
impr
ovem
ent o
f int
erve
ntio
ns; t
o en
cour
age
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
stak
ehol
ders
to b
ette
r per
form
thei
r dut
ies;
and
as
basis
for i
ncen
tive/
disi
ncen
tive
syst
em.
Info
rmat
ion
in M
&E
repo
rts
• Tr
end
of th
e st
ate
of p
erfo
rman
ce, e
colo
gica
l, an
d so
cio e
cono
mic
• Ef
fect
iven
ess o
f act
iviti
es in
ach
ievi
ng g
oals
and
obje
ctiv
es
• Ch
alle
nges
affe
ctin
g pe
rform
ance
of m
anag
emen
t bod
y •
Thre
ats a
ffect
ing
coas
tal a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces
• Ch
alle
nges
affe
ctin
g so
cioec
onom
ic st
atus
•
Reco
mm
enda
tions
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
M11
-S15
. Dat
a co
nsol
idat
ion,
ana
lysis
an
d in
terp
reta
tion
(inclu
ding
conf
iden
ce
leve
l), te
chni
cal
writ
ing,
effe
ctiv
e fe
edba
ck a
nd
pres
enta
tion
skill
s of
M&
E re
sults
How
do
you
cons
olid
ate
and
anal
yze
data
?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls
on a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht.
Have
you
rece
ived
any
trai
ning
s on
data
co
nsol
idat
ion
and
anal
ysis?
If y
es, l
ist tr
aini
ngs
rece
ived
. Ho
w d
o yo
u gi
ve fe
edba
ck a
bout
the
M&
E re
sults
(e.g
. sub
miss
ion
of re
port
s, pu
blic
pres
enta
tions
, etc
.)?
How
wou
ld y
ou ra
te y
our l
evel
of c
onfid
ence
in
data
ana
lysis
and
inte
rpre
tatio
n (e
ncirc
le y
our
answ
er o
n th
e rig
ht)?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
. SC
ALE:
0 –
Non
e, 1
– W
ith tr
aini
ng/ h
as a
ssist
ed a
few
tim
es, 2
– C
an p
erfo
rm
with
min
imum
supe
rvisi
on, 3
– C
an p
erfo
rm in
depe
nden
tly, 4
– C
an
supe
rvise
/ tea
ch o
ther
s Le
vel o
f con
fiden
ce in
dat
a an
alys
is &
inte
rpre
tatio
n (e
ncirc
le y
our a
nsw
er):
NO
NE
LO
W
FA
IRLY
CON
FIDE
NT
VERY
CON
FIDE
NT
SKILL
S 0
1 2
3 4
1. B
asic
Exce
l
2. S
PSS
3.
R S
tudi
o
4. Li
st o
ther
tool
s you
kno
w a
nd u
se:
5. T
echn
ical w
ritin
g
6. F
eedb
acki
ng
7.
Pre
sent
atio
n sk
ills
2=hi
ghly
-ski
lled
(che
cks 2
or m
ore
item
s)
1=le
ss sk
illed
(che
cks o
nly
1)
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1” w
ith tr
aini
ngs)
(M
ax=3
poi
nts)
M11
-S16
. Ana
lytic
al
skill
s to
form
ulat
e ap
prop
riate
in
terv
entio
ns
Can
you
cite
exam
ples
of i
nter
vent
ions
/ im
prov
ed st
rate
gies
that
you
dev
elop
ed a
nd/o
r im
plem
ente
d af
ter s
eein
g th
e re
sults
of t
he
M&
E? W
hy w
ere
thes
e do
ne?
Som
e of
the
inte
rven
tions
that
may
be
done
: •
Whe
n m
anag
emen
t effe
ctiv
enes
s is l
ow –
cond
ucts
skill
s tra
inin
gs/
wor
ksho
ps, i
mpr
ove
finan
cial s
trat
egie
s, co
nduc
ts a
dditi
onal
act
iviti
es,
etc.
•
Whe
n ec
olog
ical s
tatu
s is l
ow –
stre
ngth
ens e
nfor
cem
ent,
redu
ces h
abita
t th
reat
s, im
prov
e M
PA d
esig
n, e
tc.
2= ca
n cit
e m
any
exam
ples
1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
exa
mpl
e 0=
N o a
nsw
er
Page
| 1
5
• W
hen
socio
econ
omic
stat
us is
low
– co
nduc
ts a
war
enes
s cam
paig
ns,
cond
ucts
live
lihoo
d tr
aini
ngs,
cond
ucts
act
iviti
es to
incr
ease
socia
l co
hesio
n, e
tc.
12. C
ompe
tenc
y: E
ffect
ivel
y m
anag
e da
ta fo
r eas
y an
d tim
ely
acce
ss
M12
-K25
. Mec
hani
sm/
syst
em o
f dat
a m
anag
emen
t
Desc
ribe
your
dat
a m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
/mec
hani
sm.
Wha
t are
the
reso
urce
s nee
ded
to h
ave
a go
od
data
man
agem
ent s
yste
m?
Can
desc
ribe
a da
ta m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
for t
he M
PA/N
and
the
reso
urce
s ne
eded
for s
uch
a sy
stem
2
= Kn
ows o
r use
s sev
eral
stra
tegi
es
1 =
Know
s at l
east
one
0
= No
ans
wer
M12
-S17
. Org
aniza
tion
and
stor
age
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at d
ata
are
wel
l-kep
t an
d pr
oper
ly co
mpi
led?
Giv
e ex
ampl
es o
f dat
a an
d re
port
s tha
t you
hav
e pr
epar
ed –
act
ual
obse
rvat
ion
of d
ocum
ents
, rep
orts
, com
pute
r da
taba
se, e
tc.
Can
data
and
repo
rts b
e ea
sily
acce
ssed
(i.e
. ca
n da
ta a
nd re
port
s fro
m 2
010
and
2015
still
be
retr
ieve
d)?
Can
desc
ribe
how
thei
r doc
umen
ts, d
ata
on th
e M
PA/N
are
org
anize
d an
d st
ored
(e.g
. may
be
in p
rint f
orm
as r
epor
ts o
r in
logb
ooks
or e
ncod
ed a
s el
ectr
onic
files
in co
mpu
ter,
lapt
ops a
nd e
xter
nal h
ard
driv
es, e
tc.)
2 =
Know
s or u
ses s
ever
al st
rate
gies
1
= Kn
ows a
t lea
st o
ne
0 =
No a
nsw
er
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (SC
ORE)
Not
at a
ll (0
)
Som
e-tim
es
(1)
Mos
t of
the
time
(2)
All
the
time
(3)
1.
I a
m h
ones
t in
all m
y de
alin
gs.
2.
I a
m a
ppro
acha
ble
and
easy
to ta
lk w
ith.
3.
I a
m w
illin
g to
lear
n ne
w id
eas a
nd sk
ills.
4.
I e
ncou
rage
the
part
icipa
tion
and
coop
erat
ion
of a
ll st
akeh
olde
rs in
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N.
5.
I a
m d
ilige
nt a
nd h
ardw
orki
ng to
acc
ompl
ish th
e ob
ject
ives
of o
ur M
PA/N
.
6.
I str
ive
to p
erfo
rm m
y du
ties a
nd re
spon
sibili
ties t
o th
e be
st o
f my
abili
ties a
nd w
ithou
t any
ves
ted
inte
rest
.
Page
| 1
6
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (S
CORE
)
Not
at a
ll (0
)
Som
e-tim
es
(1)
Mos
t of
the
time
(2)
All
the
time
(3)
7.
I a
m g
uide
d by
the
prin
ciple
s of g
ood
gove
rnan
ce, i
.e. t
rans
pare
ncy,
acc
ount
abili
ty a
nd p
artic
ipat
ory,
etc
. in
the
de
velo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n.
8.
I f
ind
way
s to
help
raise
fund
s for
the
MPA
/N.
9.
I a
m m
eticu
lous
and
alw
ays p
ay a
tten
tion
to fi
nanc
ial d
etai
ls (e
.g. b
udge
t, fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
, etc
.).
10
. I ca
n di
spen
se m
y fin
ancia
l and
adm
inist
rativ
e du
ties i
n a
syst
emat
ic an
d ef
ficie
nt m
anne
r.
11. I
adh
ere
to th
e st
anda
rds o
f tra
nspa
renc
y an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
in a
ll fin
ancia
l tra
nsac
tions
.
12. I
alw
ays s
ee to
it th
at fu
nds a
nd re
sour
ces a
re sp
ent w
isely
and
not
in a
n ex
trav
agan
t way
.
13
. I a
m cr
eativ
e an
d re
sour
cefu
l in
dete
rmin
ing
appr
opria
te IE
C m
edia
and
mat
eria
l.
14. I
can
dete
rmin
e ap
prop
riate
mes
sage
s and
com
mun
icatio
n m
ater
ials
for d
iffer
ent a
udie
nces
.
15. I
am
fair
and
hone
st in
enf
orcin
g th
e la
w.
16
. I a
m co
urag
eous
and
min
dful
of t
he la
w w
hen
cond
uctin
g en
forc
emen
t act
iviti
es.
17
. I a
m a
lway
s res
pect
ful o
f peo
ple
and
thei
r rig
hts,
in th
e pe
rform
ance
of m
y du
ties o
n en
forc
emen
t.
18. I
am
a te
am p
laye
r and
can
wor
k in
colla
bora
tion
with
oth
ers.
19. I
am
ada
ptiv
e an
d ca
pabl
e of
mak
ing
appr
opria
te ch
ange
s as n
eede
d, b
ased
on
corr
ect i
nfor
mat
ion.
20. I
can
mak
e in
terv
entio
ns a
ccor
ding
to th
e re
sults
of t
he M
&E
in a
n ho
nest
and
fair
way
.
21. I
cons
isten
tly fo
llow
the
stan
dard
pro
cedu
res a
nd sc
hedu
les i
n co
nduc
ting
M&
E.
22
. I a
m o
rgan
ized
and
have
a sy
stem
in k
eepi
ng M
&E
data
and
repo
rts r
eadi
ly a
cces
sible
.
23. I
can
mak
e co
rrec
t jud
gmen
ts a
nd d
ecisi
ons b
ased
on
fact
s and
ava
ilabl
e da
ta.
144 Competence Assessment Tool: A Guide for Marine Protected Area (MPA) and MPA Network (MPAN) Managers and Practitioners
GUIDE TO ADMINISTERING THE TOOL AND SCORING
Personnel Category D
Page
| 1
PE
RSON
NEL C
ATEG
ORY
D
Guid
e to
Adm
inist
erin
g the
Too
l & S
corin
g
PLAN
NING
1.
Com
pete
ncy:
Con
trib
ute
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
P1-K
1. S
tate
and
im
port
ance
of c
oast
al
and
mar
ine
reso
urce
s
Wha
t is t
he st
ate
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces i
n yo
ur
area
s?
Wha
t is t
he im
port
ance
of m
anag
ing
thes
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces i
mpo
rtan
t?
Desc
ribe
the
stat
e of
coas
tal a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
seag
rass
/ man
grov
e/ co
ral
reef
s/ fi
sher
ies e
tc.)
of th
e ar
ea:
• W
here
are
they
loca
ted?
•
Can
you
estim
ate
thei
r size
(hec
tare
s), c
over
(per
cent
, lus
h, th
ick, e
tc.)
and
cond
ition
(poo
r, go
od, e
xcel
lent
)?
• Ho
w a
bout
the
fish
catc
h of
fish
erm
en –
wha
t is t
he a
vera
ge fi
sh ca
tch?
Kn
ows i
mpo
rtan
ce o
f mar
ine
reso
urce
s suc
h as
: •
Prov
ision
ing
– so
urce
of f
ood
(fish
, she
llfish
, sea
wee
d, ti
mbe
r, dr
ugs,
etc.
) •
Regu
latin
g –
coas
tal p
rote
ctio
n, p
reve
ntio
n of
ero
sion,
wat
er p
urifi
catio
n,
carb
on st
orag
e •
Cultu
ral,
spiri
tual
, bea
uty
2=ca
n de
scrib
e st
atus
of r
esou
rces
1=
can
desc
ribe
at le
ast 1
(p
lus "
1", i
f kno
ws i
mpo
rtan
ce)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
P1-K
2. M
PA/N
etw
ork
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t is y
our c
ontr
ibut
ion
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
Wha
t are
som
e of
the
cont
ents
of t
he M
PA/N
m
anag
emen
t pla
n?
Invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of M
PA/N
man
agem
ent:
•
High
ly in
volv
ed (a
nd ca
n de
scrib
e pr
oces
s of d
evel
opm
ent)
• M
oder
atel
y in
volv
ed
• Lit
tle in
volv
emen
t (e.
g. si
gnin
g in
vitat
ion
lett
ers,
etc.
) •
No in
volv
emen
t at a
ll
Has a
n id
ea o
f the
gen
eral
cont
ents
of t
he M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
such
as:
•
Ratio
nale
and
pur
pose
of M
PA/N
or V
ision
, Miss
ion
and
Goal
setti
ng
• Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
mar
ine
reso
urce
s •
Lega
l fra
mew
ork
• Or
gani
zatio
nal s
truct
ure
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Stra
tegi
c act
ion
plan
s (fo
r M&
E, E
nfor
cem
ent,
etc.
) •
Role
s and
resp
onsib
ilitie
s •
Pena
lties
and
fine
s •
Othe
r ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
2=Hi
ghly
invo
lved
1=
mod
erat
ely
invo
lved
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s con
tent
s of p
lan)
(M
ax=3
poi
nts)
Page
| 2
P1
-K3.
Ass
essm
ent/
Id
entif
icatio
n of
ris
ks/t
hrea
ts to
the
MPA
/N
Wha
t are
the
maj
or th
reat
s to
your
MPA
/N?
Wha
t are
the
impa
cts o
f the
se th
reat
s?
Know
s how
to co
nduc
t risk
/ thr
eat a
sses
smen
t and
can
desc
ribe
impa
cts o
f th
ese
thre
ats i
n th
e ar
ea
Know
s the
maj
or th
reat
s affe
ctin
g th
eir m
arin
e re
sour
ces,
such
as:
•
Over
-ext
ract
ion
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
may
spec
ify w
hich
reso
urce
s)
• Re
clam
atio
n or
conv
ersio
n of
cert
ain
part
s of t
he se
a fo
r oth
er u
ses (
e.g.
fis
h po
nds,
port
s, hu
man
settl
emen
t are
as)
• Ill
egal
fish
ing
prac
tices
: ___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
• Se
dim
enta
tion
• Po
llutio
n
• In
adeq
uate
supp
ort (
e.g.
, exe
cutiv
e, le
gisla
tive,
per
sonn
el, f
unds
, etc
.) to
m
anag
e m
arin
e re
sour
ces p
rope
rly
• Ot
her t
hrea
ts: _
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
2= C
an d
escr
ibe
man
y im
port
ant
poin
ts
1= C
an ci
te a
t lea
st o
ne
0= N
o an
swer
2. C
ompe
tenc
y: C
ontr
ibut
e to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring o
f the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t pla
n P2
-K4.
Impl
emen
ting
the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
Wha
t are
the
MPA
/N a
ctio
n pl
ans t
hat a
re
bein
g im
plem
ente
d?
Can
you
men
tion
som
e ac
tiviti
es in
the
plan
th
at h
ave
and
have
not
bee
n do
ne?
Has k
now
ledg
e of
the
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring
of th
e m
anag
emen
t pl
an (p
rogr
ams o
n M
&E,
Enf
orce
men
t, et
c.).
Ab
le to
des
crib
e so
me
of th
e ac
tiviti
es co
nduc
ted
such
as:
•
Mon
itorin
g of
cora
l ree
fs, s
eagr
ass,
man
grov
es a
nd fi
sh ca
tch
• IE
C ac
tiviti
es a
nd fe
edba
ckin
g of
mon
itorin
g re
sults
•
Patr
ollin
g •
Cons
truc
tion
of g
uard
hous
e •
Acqu
isitio
n of
equ
ipm
ent
• Es
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd m
aint
enan
ce o
f buo
ys
• Re
gula
r mee
tings
•
Upda
ting
of M
PA/N
Pla
n
2=kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
P2-S
1. A
dept
in
mon
itorin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion
proc
edur
es
How
do
you
cont
ribut
e to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
pro
gram
s and
stra
tegi
es in
dica
ted
in th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan?
Cite
exa
mpl
es.
• Pe
rform
s a ro
le in
the
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring
of th
e m
anag
emen
t pla
n (p
rogr
ams o
n M
&E,
Enf
orce
men
t, et
c.) s
uch
as:
• M
onito
ring
of co
ral r
eefs
, sea
gras
s, m
angr
oves
and
fish
catc
h •
IEC
activ
ities
and
feed
back
ing
of m
onito
ring
resu
lts
• Pa
trol
ling
• Co
nstr
uctio
n of
gua
rdho
use
• Ac
quisi
tion
of e
quip
men
t •
Esta
blish
men
t and
mai
nten
ance
of b
uoys
•
Regu
lar m
eetin
gs
• Up
datin
g of
MPA
/N P
lan
2 =
Know
s or u
ses s
ever
al st
rate
gies
1
= Kn
ows a
t lea
st o
ne
0 =
No a
nsw
er
P2-S
2. M
onito
ring
thre
ats t
o th
e M
PA/N
Ho
w d
o yo
u m
onito
r the
thre
ats t
o M
PA/N
? Ca
n de
scrib
e a
stra
tegy
to m
onito
r thr
eats
in th
eir a
rea
may
be
thro
ugh
obse
rvat
ion,
feed
back
from
oth
er w
itnes
ses,
etc.
2
= Ca
n id
entif
y w
ays t
o m
onito
r th
reat
s & g
ive
exam
ples
1
= Ca
n id
entif
y on
e w
ay a
nd/o
r ex
ampl
e
0 =
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 3
FINA
NCIN
G 3.
Com
pete
ncy:
Bas
ic fil
ing
and
mai
nten
ance
of f
inan
cial t
rans
actio
n Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g F3
-K5.
Bas
ic pr
oced
ures
for
finan
cial m
anag
emen
t
Wha
t are
the
pres
crib
ed p
roce
dure
s con
duct
ed
in y
our o
ffice
rela
ted
to fi
nanc
ial
man
agem
ent?
Ha
ve y
ou a
tten
ded
trai
ning
s rel
ated
to
finan
cial m
anag
emen
t? If
yes
, nam
e th
e tr
aini
ngs.
Know
s the
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent s
yste
m fo
r the
MPA
/N (e
.g. b
ookk
eepi
ng,
acco
untin
g, in
vent
ory,
aud
iting
, etc
.) 1
= Ca
n de
scrib
e a
syst
em/
proc
edur
e;
(plu
s "1"
if h
as a
tten
ded
trai
ning
) 0
= No
ans
wer
(M
ax =
2 p
oint
s)
F3-S
3. B
asic
docu
men
tatio
n &
bo
okke
epin
g sk
ills
How
do
you
help
in d
ocum
entin
g fin
ancia
l tr
ansa
ctio
ns a
nd b
ookk
eepi
ng?
Can
enum
erat
e ta
sks r
elat
ed to
doc
umen
tatio
n an
d bo
okke
epin
g •
1
= Ca
n de
scrib
e re
leva
nt ta
sks;
(p
lus "
1" if
has
att
ende
d tr
aini
ng)
0 =
No a
nsw
er
(Max
= 2
poi
nts)
F3
-K6.
Fam
iliar
ity w
ith
asse
ts, m
ater
ials
and
equi
pmen
t
Wha
t are
the
asse
ts, e
quip
men
t and
mat
eria
ls th
at y
ou h
ave
for t
he M
PA/N
?
Do y
ou th
ink
thes
e m
ater
ials
and
equi
pmen
t ar
e su
fficie
nt fo
r the
effe
ctiv
e m
anag
emen
t of
the
MPA
/N?
Know
s the
mat
eria
ls an
d eq
uipm
ent o
f the
offi
ce fo
r the
MPA
/N a
nd w
hat t
hey
sh
ould
be
used
for.
Can
also
thin
k of
or l
ist o
ther
mat
eria
ls an
d eq
uipm
ent t
hey
need
for t
he
effe
ctiv
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he M
PA/N
2 =
Know
s man
y 1
= Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0
= No
ans
wer
F3-S
4. B
asic
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce sk
ills
How
do
you
mak
e su
re th
at a
ll eq
uipm
ent a
nd
mat
eria
ls fo
r the
MPA
/N a
re a
ccou
nted
for a
nd
are
wor
king
pro
perly
? De
scrib
e br
iefly
. Ha
ve y
ou a
tten
ded
trai
ning
s rel
ated
to
inve
ntor
y or
mai
nten
ance
of e
quip
men
t? Li
st
trai
ning
s rec
eive
d.
Can
desc
ribe
a sy
stem
for t
he o
rgan
izatio
n an
d ac
coun
ting
of m
ater
ials
and
equi
pmen
t Kn
ows h
ow to
mai
ntai
n m
ater
ials,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd p
hysic
al st
ruct
ures
in g
ood
cond
ition
and
whe
re to
hav
e th
em re
paire
d on
ce b
roke
n (o
r has
bee
n tr
aine
d).
1 =
Can
desc
ribe
a sy
stem
/ pr
oced
ure;
(p
lus "
1" if
has
att
ende
d tr
aini
ng)
0 =
No a
nsw
er
(Max
= 2
poi
nts)
Page
| 4
COM
MUN
ICAT
IONS
4.
Com
pete
ncy:
Hel
p pr
omot
e aw
aren
ess,
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d su
ppor
t of a
nd fo
r the
MPA
/N sy
stem
and
its v
alue
s Cr
iteria
Gu
ide
Ques
tions
Ti
ps o
n ho
w to
ask
/ Exp
ecte
d an
swer
s Sc
orin
g C4
-K7.
MPA
/N
info
rmat
ion
that
nee
ds
to b
e co
mm
unica
ted
with
in a
nd o
utsid
e th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y
Wha
t are
the
mos
t im
port
ant
conc
epts
/info
rmat
ion
abou
t MPA
/Ns t
hat t
he
peop
le/c
omm
unity
shou
ld k
now
abo
ut?
Why
shou
ld o
ther
peo
ple
know
abo
ut th
e M
PA/N
in y
our a
rea?
Can
cite
impo
rtan
t inf
orm
atio
n ab
out t
he M
PA/N
that
shou
ld b
e co
mm
unica
ted
to th
e co
mm
unity
whi
ch co
uld
inclu
de th
e fo
llow
ing:
•
MPA
/N o
bjec
tives
(e.g
. fish
erie
s man
agem
ent,
biod
ivers
ity co
nser
vatio
n,
habi
tat p
rote
ctio
n, e
tc.)
• M
PA/N
thre
ats (
e.g.
ove
rfish
ing,
sedi
men
tatio
n, p
ollu
tion,
etc
.) •
Diffe
rent
mar
ine
habi
tats
(cor
al re
ef, s
eagr
ass,
man
grov
e)
• Im
port
ance
of m
arin
e re
sour
ces (
e.g.
pro
visio
ning
, reg
ulat
ing,
etc
.) •
Best
pra
ctice
s in
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t •
Law
s and
pol
icies
rela
ted
to co
asta
l and
mar
ine
envir
onm
ent a
nd
reso
urce
s •
Rule
s & re
gula
tions
; wha
t is a
llow
ed a
nd p
rohi
bite
d in
the
MPA
/N
• Co
mm
unity
invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e M
PA/N
2=kn
ows l
ots
1=kn
ows 1
0=
N o a
nsw
er
C4-S
5. E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icatio
n sk
ills
How
do
you
com
mun
icate
with
the
mem
bers
of
the
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y so
that
you
r id
eas f
or th
e M
PA/N
pla
n (d
evel
opm
ent,
upda
ting)
and
its i
mpl
emen
tatio
n w
ill b
e co
nsid
ered
/inclu
ded?
Ho
w d
o yo
u co
mm
unica
te w
ith o
ther
st
akeh
olde
rs to
pro
mot
e th
eir a
war
enes
s and
su
ppor
t tow
ards
the
MPA
/N?
He/s
he ca
n de
scrib
e m
any
way
s and
met
hods
to co
mm
unica
te w
ith m
embe
rs
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bod
y an
d th
e st
akeh
olde
rs, t
hese
coul
d in
volv
e ho
me
visit
s and
face
-to-fa
ce d
ialo
gue
or in
mor
e fo
rmal
setti
ngs s
uch
as m
eetin
gs,
trai
ning
s and
focu
s gro
up d
iscus
sions
(FGD
s) o
r thr
ough
socia
l med
ia, S
MS
as
wel
l as b
anne
r, bi
llboa
rd, p
rinte
d m
ater
ials
(pos
ters
, bro
chur
e, p
amph
let),
ed
ucat
iona
l mat
eria
ls (m
anua
l, m
odul
e, b
ooks
), au
dio-
visu
al (v
ideo
s, fil
ms)
; an
d ot
her i
nter
activ
e an
d im
agin
ativ
e w
ays s
uch
as fo
lk m
edia
, mas
cot,
skits
an
d pl
ays,
etc.
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l way
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
C4-S
6. C
oord
inat
ion
skill
s Ho
w d
o yo
u en
gage
with
mem
bers
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y? W
hy d
id y
ou
enga
ge w
ith th
em (e
.g. a
ppro
val o
f the
m
anag
emen
t pla
n, te
am b
uild
ing,
dev
elop
ing
the
M&
E pl
an, e
nfor
cem
ent,
feed
back
ac
tiviti
es e
tc.)?
Ho
w d
o yo
u en
gage
with
stak
ehol
ders
and
ot
her a
genc
ies f
or th
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he
MPA
/N?
Why
did
you
eng
age
with
them
(e.g
. fe
edba
ck a
ctiv
ities
, con
sulta
tion,
enf
orce
men
t et
c.)?
Can
desc
ribe
how
he/
she
coor
dina
tes w
ith m
embe
rs o
f the
MPA
/N
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
cite
exam
ples
of h
is/he
r int
erac
tions
with
them
. Thi
s co
uld
inclu
de a
ctiv
ities
such
as:
•
Draf
ting
or u
pdat
ing
of th
e M
PA/N
man
agem
ent p
lan
• Ap
prov
al o
f the
man
agem
ent p
lan
• Te
am-b
uild
ing
• De
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an
• En
forc
emen
t pla
nnin
g an
d m
onito
ring
Ca
n de
scrib
e ho
w h
e/sh
e co
ordi
nate
s with
MPA
/N st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd o
ther
ag
encie
s for
the
man
agem
ent o
f the
MPA
/N a
nd ci
te e
xam
ples
of h
is/he
r in
tera
ctio
ns w
ith th
em. P
ossib
le re
ason
s for
eng
agem
ent c
an b
e:
• S e
ek su
ppor
t (fu
ndin
g, te
chni
cal a
ssist
ance
, etc
.)
• De
velo
ping
the
M&
E pl
an
• Pr
oduc
tion
of IE
C m
ater
ials
• En
cour
age
part
icipa
tion
and
supp
ort f
or M
PA/N
•
Join
t enf
orce
men
t
2=ca
n de
scrib
e ho
w h
e co
ordi
nate
s w
ith th
em
1=kn
ows o
nly
1 0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s 1, i
f kno
ws w
hy h
e en
gage
s with
th
em
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
Page
| 5
C4
-S7.
Peo
ple
skill
s De
scrib
e yo
ur w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
p w
ith 1
) m
embe
rs o
f the
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
2)
stak
ehol
ders
. Ho
w d
o yo
u ha
ndle
disa
gree
men
ts b
etw
een
mem
bers
of t
he M
PA o
r MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bo
dy?
Can
desc
ribe
wor
king
rela
tions
hip
(whe
ther
pos
itive
, clo
se a
nd e
ffect
ive)
with
m
embe
rs o
f man
agem
ent b
ody
as w
ell a
s sta
keho
lder
s Ha
s str
ateg
ies t
o re
solv
e co
nflic
ts a
nd d
isagr
eem
ents
am
ong
mem
bers
of t
he
MPA
/N m
anag
emen
t bod
y –
whi
ch m
ay b
e do
ne th
roug
h fo
rmal
and
info
rmal
m
eetin
gs a
nd co
mm
unica
tions
and
can
cite
inst
ance
s whe
n th
ese
happ
ened
2=ca
n de
scrib
e w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
ps
1=kn
ows o
nly
1 0=
No a
nsw
er
( plu
s “1”
, if h
as st
rate
gy o
n ho
w to
ha
ndle
conf
licts
and
disa
gree
men
ts)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
ENFO
RCEM
ENT
5. C
ompe
tenc
y: P
reve
ntio
n an
d de
tect
ion
of il
lega
l act
iviti
es
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
E5-K
8. La
ws r
elat
ed to
M
PA/N
s W
hat p
ertin
ent n
atio
nal l
aws,
loca
l ord
inan
ces
and
othe
r iss
uanc
es re
late
d to
MPA
/Ns t
hat
you
know
of?
W
hat a
re th
e pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
act
iviti
es
in y
our M
PA/N
?
He m
ay g
ive
the
spec
ific o
rdin
ance
s ena
cted
for t
he M
PA/N
in th
e ar
ea, o
r the
la
w th
at w
as p
asse
d sp
ecifi
c for
the
NIPA
S as
wel
l as t
he W
ildlif
e Ac
t, am
ende
d Fi
sher
ies L
aw, R
A 11
038
(ENI
PAS
Law
), an
d ot
her l
ocal
/mun
icipa
l/pro
vinc
ial
ordi
nanc
es th
at h
ave
been
pas
sed
whi
ch a
re re
late
d to
the
MPA
/N.
Can
men
tion
activ
ities
that
are
pro
hibi
ted
in th
e M
PA/N
: -
fishi
ng in
side
the
proh
ibite
d zo
ne o
r NO
TAKE
ZON
E; in
trusio
n in
to th
e re
gula
ted
zone
; fish
ing
usin
g un
auth
orize
d ge
ar, d
ynam
ite o
r poi
son
and
noxio
us su
bsta
nces
; bui
ldin
g Ill
egal
stru
ctur
es; p
ollu
tion;
colle
ctio
n of
m
arin
e or
gani
sms;
dum
ping
of g
arba
ge; c
olle
ctio
n of
sam
ples
or m
arin
e or
gani
sms f
or sa
le; h
untin
g or
capt
ure
of e
ndan
gere
d m
arin
e or
gani
sms;
tour
ism a
ctiv
ities
in p
rohi
bite
d zo
nes,
and
man
y ot
hers
) An
d ac
tiviti
es th
at a
re a
llow
ed in
the
MPA
/N:
recr
eatio
nal d
ivin
g in
des
igna
ted
zone
, res
earc
h, n
avig
atio
n, e
tc.
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l law
s 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if a
ble
to m
entio
n pr
ohib
ited
and
allo
wed
act
iviti
es)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
E5-K
9. E
nfor
cem
ent
stra
tegi
es
Desc
ribe
maj
or st
rate
gies
rela
ted
to p
reve
ntio
n an
d de
tect
ion
bein
g im
plem
ente
d in
the
MPA
/N.
Wha
t is y
our r
ole
in th
e pr
even
tion
and
dete
ctio
n st
ages
of M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t?
Can
desc
ribe
stra
tegi
es e
mpl
oyed
in th
eir a
rea
and
his/
her r
ole
Pr
even
tive
stra
tegi
es a
im to
ens
ure
wid
e di
ssem
inat
ion
of re
gula
tions
and
in
crea
sed
read
ines
s of e
nfor
cers
whi
ch w
ill in
clude
inst
alla
tion
of m
arke
r buo
ys
arou
nd th
e M
PA/N
, sig
nage
and
bill
boar
ds, c
ondu
ct o
f com
mun
ity d
ialo
gues
, en
gage
men
t of m
edia
org
aniza
tions
and
trai
ning
/dep
utat
ion
of e
nfor
cers
. De
tect
ion
stra
tegi
es a
ims t
o en
sure
gre
ater
chan
ces o
f disc
over
ing
viol
atio
ns
and
will
inclu
de in
stal
latio
n of
gua
rdho
uses
; pro
cure
men
t of e
quip
men
t suc
h as
bin
ocul
ars,
spot
light
s and
rada
rs;
2 =
Men
tions
seve
ral s
trat
egie
s 1
= M
entio
ns o
ne st
rate
gy
0 =
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s rol
e)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
E5-S
8. E
nfor
cem
ent
skill
s rel
ated
to
prev
entio
n an
d de
tect
ion
How
do
you
prev
ent a
nd d
etec
t ille
gal
activ
ities
? Ci
te e
xam
ples
.
Prev
entio
n &
det
ectio
n ca
n be
thro
ugh
regu
lar p
atro
lling
, IEC
cam
paig
ns,
trai
ning
for e
nfor
cers
, oth
ers
2 =
Men
tions
seve
ral s
trat
egie
s 1
= M
entio
ns 1
stra
tegy
0
= No
ans
wer
Page
| 6
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
the
prev
entio
n an
d de
tect
ion
of il
lega
l act
iviti
es?
Nam
e th
e tr
aini
ngs.
(plu
s “1”
, if h
as a
tten
ded
1-2
trai
ning
s; p
lus “
2”, i
f has
att
ende
d m
ore
than
2 tr
aini
ngs)
(M
ax=4
poi
nts)
6.
Com
pete
ncy:
Ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e an
d pr
oper
app
rehe
nsio
n of
susp
ects
and
viol
ator
s E6
-K10
. Det
aile
d kn
owle
dge
on
pena
lties
and
fine
s ac
cord
ing
to la
ws a
nd
ordi
nanc
es
Wha
t are
the
fines
and
pen
altie
s of p
rohi
bite
d ac
tiviti
es in
you
r MPA
/N a
s ind
icate
d in
ex
istin
g la
ws a
nd o
rdin
ance
s?
The
answ
er to
this
will
tell
of h
is kn
owle
dge
of th
e sp
ecifi
c fin
es a
nd p
enal
ties
impo
sed
on v
iola
tions
as w
ritte
n in
the
ordi
nanc
e/ la
w fo
r the
ir M
PA/N
.
2=ca
n cit
e se
vera
l 1=
can
cite
at le
ast 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
E6-K
11. P
rope
r ap
preh
ensio
n pr
oced
ures
Desc
ribe
the
gene
ral a
ppre
hens
ion
proc
edur
es
for v
iola
tors
in y
our M
PA/N
. De
scrib
e th
e do
cum
enta
tion
requ
irem
ents
ne
eded
in a
ppre
hens
ion.
W
hat i
s you
r rol
e in
the
appr
ehen
sion
stag
e of
M
PA/N
enf
orce
men
t?
Arre
st, s
earc
h, se
izure
and
det
entio
n (A
SSD)
refe
rs to
act
iviti
es d
one
befo
re
pros
ecut
ion
for t
he p
urpo
se o
f est
ablis
hing
pro
babl
e ca
use,
if n
ot th
e gu
ilt, o
f th
e ac
cuse
d. A
rres
t is t
he ta
king
of a
per
son
into
cust
ody
so h
e m
ay a
nsw
er
char
ges f
or a
n of
fens
e. A
ll th
is in
form
atio
n m
ust b
e cle
arly
writ
ten
in th
e M
PA/N
Enf
orce
men
t Pla
n.
Polic
e of
ficer
s, of
ficer
s cha
rged
with
the
enfo
rcem
ent o
f coa
stal
law
s, or
de
putiz
ed fi
sh w
arde
ns m
ay co
nduc
t an
arre
st. W
arra
ntle
ss a
rres
ts a
re
com
mon
in co
asta
l law
enf
orce
men
t whe
re v
iola
tors
are
ofte
n ab
oard
a
spee
ding
ves
sel t
hat c
an e
asily
get
aw
ay. W
arra
ntle
ss a
rres
ts a
re v
alid
in th
e fo
llow
ing
inst
ance
s: (1
) whi
le th
e of
fens
e in
bei
ng co
mm
itted
– p
erso
n is
caug
ht fi
shin
g in
side
MPA
; dyn
amite
is se
en in
side
fishi
ng v
esse
l of a
fis
herm
an; a
ctua
l bla
st fi
shin
g; (2
) whe
n th
e of
fens
e ha
s jus
t bee
n co
mm
itted
A
Mira
nda
War
ning
is g
iven
and
the
occa
sion
whe
n th
is w
as d
one
shou
ld b
e in
clude
d in
the
affid
avit.
Mira
nda
Righ
ts sh
ould
be
expl
aine
d to
the
pers
on in
a
lang
uage
or d
iale
ct u
nder
stoo
d by
him
.
2=Kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No
answ
er
(plu
s “1”
, if k
now
s rol
e)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
E6-K
12. R
ight
s of
deta
inee
s, su
spec
ts
and
witn
esse
s
Can
you
enum
erat
e th
e rig
hts o
f det
aine
es,
susp
ects
, and
witn
esse
s?
Righ
ts o
f a w
itnes
s: 1.
To
be p
rote
cted
from
irre
leva
nt, i
mpr
oper
or i
nsul
ting
ques
tions
, and
from
ha
rsh
or in
sulti
ng d
emea
nor;
2. N
ot to
be
deta
ined
long
er th
an th
e in
tere
sts o
f jus
tice
requ
ire;
3. N
ot to
be
exam
ined
exc
ept o
nly
as to
mat
ters
per
tinen
t to
the
issue
; 4.
Not
to g
ive
an a
nsw
er w
hich
will
tend
to su
bjec
t him
to a
pen
alty
for a
n of
fens
e un
less
oth
erw
ise p
rovi
ded
by la
w; o
r 5.
Not
to g
ive
an a
nsw
er w
hich
will
tend
to d
egra
de h
is re
puta
tion.
Ri
ghts
of t
he a
ccus
ed (b
efor
e ca
se is
file
d in
cour
t or w
hen
it is
with
pro
secu
tor
for p
relim
inar
y in
vest
igat
ion/
und
er cu
stod
y):
1. R
ight
to re
mai
n sil
ent
2. R
ight
to co
unse
l 3.
Rig
ht to
be
info
rmed
4.
Rig
ht to
hav
e ev
iden
ce o
btai
ned
in vi
olat
ion
of th
ose
reje
cted
3=M
entio
ns o
ver 5
righ
ts
2= M
entio
ns 3
-4 ri
ghts
1=
Men
tions
1-2
righ
ts
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 7
Righ
ts o
f the
acc
used
afte
r the
case
is fi
led
in co
urt:
1. R
ight
to re
fuse
to b
e a
witn
ess
2. N
ot to
hav
e an
y pr
ejud
ice w
hats
oeve
r res
ult t
o hi
m b
ecau
se o
f suc
h re
fusa
l 3.
Rig
ht to
test
ify in
his
own
beha
lf, su
bjec
t to
cros
s exa
min
atio
n by
the
pros
ecut
ion
4. W
hile
test
ifyin
g –
to re
fuse
to a
nsw
er sp
ecifi
c que
stio
n w
hich
will
in
crim
inat
e hi
m
Righ
t to
bail;
Rig
ht to
spee
dy tr
ial;
Righ
t to
prot
ectio
n (W
itnes
s Pro
tect
ion
Prog
ram
) E6
-S9.
Enf
orce
men
t sk
ills r
elat
ed to
ap
preh
ensio
n
Wha
t ste
ps d
o yo
u fo
llow
whe
n yo
u ap
preh
end
som
eone
?
Have
you
att
ende
d tr
aini
ngs r
elat
ed to
the
appr
ehen
sion
of su
spec
ted
viol
ator
s? Li
st
enfo
rcem
ent-r
elat
ed tr
aini
ngs a
tten
ded.
By b
eing
wel
l-ver
sed
with
the
law
and
ord
inan
ces r
elat
ed to
the
MPA
/N; i
ts
proh
ibite
d ac
ts, f
ines
and
pen
altie
s; as
wel
l as t
he p
roto
col w
hen
cond
uctin
g en
forc
emen
t and
arr
est.
Trai
ning
s and
refre
sher
cour
ses o
n en
forc
emen
t are
ne
eded
for t
his.
2=Kn
ows c
orre
ct st
eps
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
(plu
s “1”
, if h
as tr
aini
ng)
(Max
=3 p
oint
s)
7.
Com
pete
ncy:
Doc
umen
tatio
n an
d fe
edba
ck o
f enf
orce
men
t act
iviti
es
E7-K
13. B
asic
docu
men
tatio
n fo
r en
forc
emen
t pr
oced
ures
Wha
t is t
he p
roce
ss o
f doc
umen
tatio
n of
en
forc
emen
t act
iviti
es?
Wha
t are
the
docu
men
tatio
n re
quire
men
ts
need
ed in
app
rehe
nsio
n?
Docu
men
tatio
n is
very
impo
rtan
t in
enfo
rcem
ent –
succ
essf
ul p
rose
cutio
n is
due
to th
e pr
esen
ce o
f evi
denc
e w
hich
will
est
ablis
h th
e tru
th a
nd p
rove
fact
s to
the
cour
ts a
nd q
uasi-
judi
cial b
odie
s (su
ch a
s adm
inist
rativ
e bo
dies
that
may
al
so d
ecid
e on
case
s).
Ev
iden
ce ca
n be
clas
sifie
d as
: 1.
Obj
ect o
r rea
l evi
denc
e –
tang
ible
whi
ch ca
n be
exh
ibite
d or
dem
onst
rate
d by
exa
min
atio
n or
vie
win
g (e
.g. f
ish sa
mpl
es w
hich
can
be fu
rthe
r exa
min
ed
for u
se o
f exp
losiv
es/p
oiso
n/po
llutio
n, fi
shin
g ge
ar a
nd v
esse
ls)
2. D
ocum
enta
ry e
vide
nce
– w
ritte
n in
stru
men
ts o
r doc
umen
ts su
ch a
s per
mits
an
d lic
ense
s, in
vent
ory
and
seizu
re re
ceip
ts, a
nd p
hoto
s. Th
e ad
miss
ibili
ty o
f ph
otos
is d
eter
min
ed b
y its
acc
urac
y in
por
tray
ing
esse
nce
of cr
ime.
Pho
tos
are
very
hel
pful
to co
rrob
orat
e ev
iden
ce o
f fish
ery
viol
atio
ns –
pho
tos o
f fis
hery
pro
duct
s sei
zed;
pho
tos o
f ord
erly
cond
uct o
f the
arr
est,
sear
ch o
r se
izure
to n
egat
e al
lega
tions
of p
lant
ing
of e
vide
nce;
pho
tos o
f net
with
ru
ler t
o in
dica
te si
ze
3. T
estim
onia
l evi
denc
e –
test
imon
y or
dep
ositi
on o
f a w
itnes
s (e.
g. te
stim
ony
of th
e ap
preh
endi
ng te
am, d
epos
ition
of w
itnes
ses)
. Af
fidav
its o
f arr
est,
sear
ch a
nd se
izure
shou
ld b
e pr
epar
ed a
s soo
n as
pos
sible
. Le
gal F
orm
s/ D
ocum
ents
: Com
plai
nt fo
r Pre
limin
ary
Inve
stig
atio
n, Jo
int
Affid
avit
of W
itnes
ses,
Affid
avit
of A
rres
t; W
arra
nt o
f Arr
est,
Appr
ehen
sion
Repo
rt, B
ooki
ng S
heet
and
Arr
est R
epor
t; Se
arch
War
rant
, Boa
rdin
g Ce
rtifi
cate
, In
vent
ory
Repo
rt o
f Con
fisca
ted
Artic
les,
Rece
ipts
of C
onfis
cate
d Fi
sh/
2=Kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 8
Conf
iscat
ed G
ear/
Fish
Sam
ples
Tak
en/ I
mpo
unde
d Bo
at/ I
tem
s for
Tem
pora
ry
Cust
ody/
by
Hosp
itals
or P
enal
Inst
itutio
ns o
f Con
fisca
ted
Fish
.
E7-K
14. D
etai
ls of
lega
l pr
oces
ses
Desc
ribe
the
proc
ess f
or fi
ling
case
s aga
inst
ap
preh
ende
d vi
olat
ors,
i.e. f
iling
the
polic
e re
port
or b
lotte
r; Co
urt p
roce
dure
s?
Can
desc
ribe
in d
etai
l the
pro
cess
(Rul
es o
n Cr
imin
al P
roce
dure
) – co
mpl
aint
fil
ed fo
r vio
latio
ns o
f fish
ery
law
s, ru
les,
regu
latio
ns a
nd o
rdin
ance
s by
offic
ers
from
the
PN, P
CG, P
NP, B
anta
y Da
gat,
fish
war
dens
, etc
. with
in th
e pr
escr
iptiv
e pe
riod
in th
e co
urt o
r pro
secu
tor’s
offi
ce w
ith th
e pr
oper
juris
dict
ion
(MTC
, RT
C, S
andi
ganb
ayan
). A
prel
imin
ary
inve
stig
atio
n (P
I) is
cond
ucte
d be
fore
the
com
plai
nt is
file
d in
cour
t by
pros
ecut
or. W
hen
accu
sed
is la
wfu
lly a
rres
ted
with
out w
arra
nt th
e co
mpl
aint
may
be
filed
with
out P
I and
an
inqu
est
inve
stig
atio
n is
cond
ucte
d in
stea
d. O
ther
cour
t pro
cedu
res f
ollo
w a
fter t
he
inve
stig
atio
n. A
ffida
vits
and
oth
er fo
rms o
f evi
denc
es/ d
ocum
ents
gat
here
d du
ring
the
cour
se o
f inv
estig
atio
n w
ill b
e su
bmitt
ed.
A pe
rson
und
er cu
stod
ial i
nves
tigat
ion
has t
he M
irand
a Ri
ghts
: •
Righ
t to
rem
ain
silen
t •
Righ
t to
a co
unse
l of h
is ow
n ch
oice
•
Righ
t to
be fu
rnish
ed w
ith a
n in
depe
nden
t cou
nsel
by
the
Stat
e if
he
cann
ot a
fford
one
•
Righ
t to
be in
form
ed o
f the
se ri
ghts
If
a pe
rson
und
er cu
stod
ial i
nves
tigat
ion
mak
es a
n ad
miss
ion
or co
nfes
sion,
but
he
was
NOT
info
rmed
of h
is rig
hts,
his a
dmiss
ion
will
NOT
be
adm
issib
le. T
he
adm
issio
n m
ust b
e m
ade
in w
ritin
g, si
gned
by
him
in th
e pr
esen
ce o
f his
coun
sel.
2=Kn
ows a
lot
1=kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
Page
| 9
MON
ITOR
ING
AND
EVAL
UATI
ON
8. C
ompe
tenc
y: C
ondu
ct o
f mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
(M&
E)
Crite
ria
Guid
e Qu
estio
ns
Tips
on
how
to a
sk/ E
xpec
ted
answ
ers
Scor
ing
M8-
K15.
MPA
/Net
wor
k ob
ject
ives
W
hat a
re th
e ob
ject
ives
of t
he M
PA/N
?
Wha
t ind
icato
r/s n
eed
to b
e m
onito
red
to
dete
rmin
e if
thes
e ob
ject
ives
are
bei
ng m
et?
Know
s the
obj
ectiv
es &
indi
cato
rs o
f the
MPA
/N w
hich
can
inclu
de:
• Sus
tain
able
fish
erie
s – in
crea
sed
fish
stoc
k (b
iom
ass,
abun
danc
e);
incr
ease
d fis
h ca
tch
(CPU
E); i
ncre
ased
/mai
ntai
ned
larv
al
supp
ly/r
ecru
itmen
t; ab
senc
e/de
crea
se o
f ille
gal/d
estru
ctiv
e fis
hing
pr
actic
es
• Bio
dive
rsity
cons
erva
tion
– pr
otec
tion
of cr
itica
l hab
itats
; mai
ntai
ned
ecol
ogica
l con
nect
ivity
; im
prov
ed st
atus
of t
hrea
tene
d sp
ecie
s; im
prov
ed
popu
latio
n siz
e • C
limat
e ch
ange
ada
ptat
ion
– pr
otec
tion
of re
silie
nt a
reas
; pro
tect
ion
of
criti
cal h
abita
ts; p
rote
ctio
n sim
ilar h
abita
ts a
long
env
ironm
enta
l gra
dien
t; re
duce
d th
reat
s; en
hanc
e ec
olog
ical c
onne
ctiv
ity
• Int
er-L
GU a
llian
ce –
Mem
oran
dum
of A
gree
men
ts; h
arm
onize
d CR
M
rela
ted
ordi
nanc
es; j
oint
enf
orce
men
t • E
coto
urism
– e
quita
ble
bene
fits;
incr
ease
d in
com
e • P
rote
ctio
n of
thre
aten
ed sp
ecie
s – im
prov
ed st
atus
of t
hrea
tene
d sp
ecie
s; im
prov
ed p
opul
atio
n siz
e • S
ocia
l net
wor
k –
incr
ease
d co
llabo
ratio
ns; s
harin
g of
exp
ertis
e an
d re
sour
ces;
exch
ange
of k
now
ledg
e
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l obj
ectiv
es
1=ca
n m
entio
n at
leas
t 1 o
bjec
tive
0= N
o an
swer
(p
lus “
1”, i
f kno
ws i
ndica
tors
) (M
ax=3
poi
nts)
M8-
K16.
MPA
/N M
&E
prog
ram
W
hat i
s mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
and
why
is
it im
port
ant?
Do
es y
our M
PA/N
hav
e a
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
If
yes,
wha
t was
you
r inv
olve
men
t in
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
M&
E pr
ogra
m?
Can
expl
ain
wha
t is b
eing
mon
itore
d an
d ev
alua
ted
whi
ch m
ay in
clude
the
stat
us o
f man
agem
ent e
ffect
iven
ess;
com
pete
nce/
capa
city
of th
e m
anag
emen
t bo
dy; s
tatu
s of c
oast
al a
nd m
arin
e re
sour
ces;
as w
ell a
s soc
ioec
onom
ic fa
ctor
s M
&E
is do
ne fo
r the
follo
win
g re
ason
s: •
To d
eter
min
e ef
fect
iven
ess o
f act
iviti
es in
ach
ievi
ng g
oals
and
obje
ctiv
es
• Fo
r dec
ision
mak
ing
and
plan
ning
of a
ctiv
ity
• Ca
n be
use
d as
bas
is fo
r tra
inin
gs/w
orks
hops
Ca
n di
scus
s lev
el o
f inv
olve
men
t, if
any,
on
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
M&
E pr
ogra
m
2=ve
ry k
now
ledg
eabl
e (s
ever
al it
ems
/ rea
sons
not
ed)
1=m
entio
ns a
t lea
st 1
0=
No a
nsw
er
M8-
K17.
Com
pone
nts
of th
e M
PA/N
M&
E pr
ogra
m
- Pe
rform
ance
M&
E sy
stem
-
Ecol
ogica
l/ bi
ophy
sical
M&
E sy
stem
Wha
t are
the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of y
our M
&E
prog
ram
?
Wha
t are
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f eac
h co
mpo
nent
?
The
M&
E pr
ogra
m u
sual
ly h
as m
any
com
pone
nts a
nd ca
n in
clude
the
follo
win
g co
mpo
nent
s, ob
ject
ives
and
tool
s to
mea
sure
them
: •
Perfo
rman
ce &
effe
ctiv
enes
s of m
anag
emen
t bod
y –
impr
ove
capa
city
and
com
pete
nce
of m
anag
emen
t bod
y, F
inan
cial s
usta
inab
ility
, Bud
get
allo
catio
ns, C
olla
bora
tion
with
oth
er st
akeh
olde
rs, A
dopt
ion
of o
rdin
ance
s su
ppor
ting
MPA
/N
▪ TO
OLS:
MEA
T, M
ETT,
NEA
T, e
tc.
• Ec
olog
ical/
biop
hysic
al –
mon
itor c
hang
es in
fish
bio
mas
s and
den
sity
(incr
ease
d/m
aint
aine
d), I
ncre
ased
/mai
ntai
ned
seag
rass
, man
grov
e an
d co
ral c
over
s; Pr
otec
tion
of cr
itica
l hab
itats
▪
TOOL
S: H
abita
t mon
itorin
g th
roug
h va
rious
met
hods
fish
visu
al
2=ca
n m
entio
n se
vera
l com
pone
nts,
obje
ctiv
es +
tool
s 1=
can
men
tion
1 co
mpo
nent
, ob
ject
ive,
at l
east
, with
or w
ithou
t to
ol
0=No
ans
wer
Page
| 1
0
- So
cio-e
cono
mic
M&
E sy
stem
ce
nsus
, tra
nsec
t sur
veys
with
pho
toqu
adra
ts o
r LIT
, Ree
f Che
ck,
etc.
•
Socio
-eco
nom
ic –
incr
ease
d in
com
e, in
crea
sed
socia
l gro
ups
• TO
OLS:
land
ed ca
tch
surv
ey, m
arke
t sur
vey,
SEA
T, fi
sh ca
tch
mon
itorin
g (C
PUE)
M
8-K1
8. In
dica
tors
us
ed in
M&
E -
Perfo
rman
ce M
&E
- Ec
olog
ical/
biop
hysic
al M
&E
- So
cio-e
cono
mic
M&
E
Wha
t are
the
indi
cato
rs th
at y
ou m
onito
r for
ea
ch o
f the
mai
n co
mpo
nent
s of y
our M
&E
prog
ram
? In
the
tabl
e on
the
right
, che
ck th
e in
dica
tors
th
at y
ou u
se a
nd sp
ecify
how
ofte
n th
ey a
re
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Acro
nym
s use
d:
MEA
T –
MPA
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess A
sses
smen
t To
ol
MET
T –
Man
agem
ent E
ffect
iven
ess T
rack
ing
Tool
NE
AT –
Net
wor
k Ef
fect
iven
ess A
sses
smen
t Too
l CP
UE –
Cat
ch p
er u
nit e
ffort
Chec
k th
e in
dica
tors
that
you
use
and
spec
ify h
ow o
ften
they
are
mon
itore
d (a
nnua
l, qu
arte
rly).
Indi
cato
rs
Chec
k if
mon
itore
d Sc
hedu
le o
f m
onito
ring
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A.
Leve
l & ra
ting
(MEA
T)
B. S
core
(MET
T)
C. Le
vel &
ratin
g (N
EAT)
D.
Oth
er:
ECOL
OGIC
AL
A. %
live
cora
l cov
er
B. F
ish b
iom
ass (
tons
/sq.
km)
C. %
seag
rass
cove
r or d
ensit
y
D.
Num
ber o
f spe
cies:
1.
Fish
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
E. %
man
grov
e ca
nopy
cove
r
F.
Tot
al a
rea
(hec
tare
s)
1. C
oral
reef
2.
Sea
gras
s
3.
Man
grov
e
G. M
arin
e m
amm
al si
ghtin
gs &
m
orta
litie
s (sp
ecie
s)
H. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A. H
ouse
hold
inco
me
B. F
ish ca
tch
(CPU
E)
C. O
ther
(pls.
spec
ify):
2=ve
ry k
now
ledg
eabl
e (c
heck
s se
vera
l ite
ms)
1=
men
tions
at l
east
1
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, w
ith sc
hedu
le o
f mon
itorin
g in
dica
ted)
(M
ax p
oint
s=3)
Page
| 1
1
M8-
S10.
Effe
ctiv
ely
cond
uct M
&E
surv
eys
Do y
ou co
nduc
t M&
E su
rvey
s (i.e
. pe
rform
ance
, soc
io-e
cono
mic,
eco
logi
cal)?
Ha
ve y
ou re
ceiv
ed a
ny tr
aini
ngs o
n M
PA/N
M
&E
surv
eys/
met
hods
? Lis
t tra
inin
gs re
ceiv
ed.
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls
on a
scal
e of
0-4
in th
e ta
ble
on th
e rig
ht.
SCAL
E:
0 –
None
1
– W
ith tr
aini
ng/ h
as a
ssist
ed a
few
tim
es
2 –
Can
perfo
rm w
ith m
inim
um su
perv
ision
3
– Ca
n pe
rform
inde
pend
ently
4
– Ca
n su
perv
ise a
gro
up
Acro
nym
s use
d:
CPCE
– C
oral
poi
nt co
unt w
ith E
xcel
ext
ensio
ns
SEAT
– S
ocio
-eco
nom
ic As
sess
men
t Too
l So
cMon
– S
ocio
econ
omic
Mon
itorin
g
Rate
you
r ski
lls b
y tic
king
a b
ox u
sing
the
indi
cate
d sc
ale
(see
left
colu
mn)
.
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
skill
s 0
1 2
3 4
PERF
ORM
ANCE
A. M
EAT
B.
MET
T
C. N
EAT
D.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
ECOL
OGIC
AL/ B
IOPH
YSIC
AL
A.
Cor
al re
ef a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
1. M
anta
tow
2
. Lin
e in
terc
ept t
rans
ect (
LIT)
3
. Pho
toqu
adra
t &CP
CE
4. F
ish v
isual
cens
us (F
VC)
5. R
eef C
heck
B. S
eagr
ass a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
C.
Sea
wee
d as
sess
men
t & m
onito
ring
D.
Bea
ch fo
rest
ass
essm
ent &
mon
itorin
g
E. In
vert
ebra
te a
sses
smen
t & m
onito
ring
F.
Cet
acea
n id
entif
icatio
n/ su
rvey
G. M
arin
e tu
rtle
iden
tifica
tion/
surv
ey
H.
Sea
bird
surv
ey
I.
Othe
r (pl
s. sp
ecify
):
SOCI
O-EC
ONOM
IC
A.
SEA
T
B. S
ocM
on
C.
Oth
er (p
ls. sp
ecify
):
2=hi
ghly
-ski
lled
(che
cks 2
or m
ore
item
s)
1=le
ss sk
illed
(che
cks o
nly
1)
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1”, w
ith tr
aini
ngs)
(M
ax p
oint
s=3)
Page
| 1
2
9.Co
mpe
tenc
y: A
ssist
in p
repa
ratio
n of
repo
rts a
nd fe
edba
ck a
ctiv
ities
M
9-K1
9. M
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n re
sults
W
hy is
it im
port
ant t
o re
port
M&
E re
sults
?
M&
E re
sults
can
be u
sed
for l
earn
ing;
for d
ecisi
on m
akin
g an
d pl
anni
ng fo
r ad
ditio
nal a
ctiv
ities
and
impr
ovem
ent o
f int
erve
ntio
ns; t
o en
cour
age
man
agem
ent b
ody
and
stak
ehol
ders
to b
ette
r per
form
thei
r dut
ies;
and
as
basis
for i
ncen
tive/
disi
ncen
tive
syst
em.
2 =
Know
s man
y 1
= Kn
ows a
t lea
st 1
0
= No
ans
wer
M9-
S11.
Dat
a co
nsol
idat
ion,
ana
lysis
an
d in
terp
reta
tion
(inclu
ding
conf
iden
ce
leve
l), te
chni
cal
writ
ing,
effe
ctiv
e fe
edba
ck a
nd
pres
enta
tion
skill
s of
M&
E re
sults
How
do
you
cons
olid
ate,
ana
lyse
dat
a an
d pr
esen
t M&
E re
sults
?
Have
you
rece
ived
any
trai
ning
s on
data
co
nsol
idat
ion
and
anal
ysis?
If y
es, l
ist tr
aini
ngs
rece
ived
. Ho
w d
o yo
u gi
ve fe
edba
ck a
bout
the
M&
E re
sults
(e.g
. sub
miss
ion
of re
port
s, pu
blic
pres
enta
tions
, etc
.)?
How
wou
ld y
ou ra
te y
our l
evel
of c
onfid
ence
in
data
ana
lysis
and
inte
rpre
tatio
n?
Chec
k th
e on
es y
ou k
now
and
rate
you
r ski
lls o
n a
scal
e of
0-4
. SC
ALE:
0 –
Non
e, 1
– W
ith tr
aini
ng/ h
as a
ssist
ed a
few
tim
es, 2
– C
an p
erfo
rm
with
min
imum
supe
rvisi
on, 3
– C
an p
erfo
rm in
depe
nden
tly, 4
– C
an
supe
rvise
/ tea
ch o
ther
s
Leve
l of c
onfid
ence
in d
ata
anal
ysis
& in
terp
reta
tion
(enc
ircle
you
r ans
wer
):
NONE
LOW
FAIR
LY C
ONFI
DENT
VE
RY C
ONFI
DENT
SKILL
S 0
1 2
3 4
1. B
asic
Exce
l
2. S
PSS
3.
R S
tudi
o
4. Li
st o
ther
tool
s you
kno
w a
nd u
se:
5. T
echn
ical w
ritin
g
6. F
eedb
acki
ng
7.
Pre
sent
atio
n sk
ills
2=hi
ghly
-ski
lled
(che
cks 2
or m
ore
item
s)
1=le
ss sk
illed
(che
cks o
nly
1)
0=No
ans
wer
(p
lus “
1” w
ith tr
aini
ngs)
(M
ax=3
poi
nts)
10. C
ompe
tenc
y: A
ssist
in m
anag
ing
data
for e
asy
acce
ss
M10
-K20
. M
echa
nism
/s
yste
m o
f dat
a m
anag
emen
t
Desc
ribe
your
dat
a m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
/mec
hani
sm.
Can
desc
ribe
a da
ta m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
for t
he M
PA/N
and
the
reso
urce
s ne
eded
for s
uch
a sy
stem
2
= Kn
ows o
r use
s a sy
stem
&
reso
urce
s 1
= Kn
ows a
t lea
st o
ne
0 =
No a
nsw
er
M10
-S12
. Org
aniza
tion
and
stor
age
How
do
you
help
org
anize
and
stor
e da
ta a
nd
repo
rts?
Ca
n da
ta a
nd re
port
s be
easil
y ac
cess
ed (i
.e.
can
data
and
repo
rts f
rom
201
0 an
d 20
15 st
ill
be re
trie
ved)
?
Can
desc
ribe
how
thei
r doc
umen
ts, d
ata
on th
e M
PA/N
are
org
anize
d an
d st
ored
(e.g
. may
be
in p
rint f
orm
as r
epor
ts o
r in
logb
ooks
or e
ncod
ed a
s el
ectr
onic
files
in co
mpu
ter,
lapt
ops a
nd e
xter
nal h
ard
driv
es, e
tc.)
2 =
Know
s or u
ses s
yste
m a
nd ty
pes
of d
ata
stor
ed
1 =
Know
s at l
east
one
0
= No
ans
wer
Page
| 1
3
Plea
se ra
te y
our w
ork
attit
udes
by
ticki
ng/c
heck
ing
on th
e bo
xes o
n th
e rig
ht. T
ick/c
heck
onl
y on
e an
swer
per
item
.
Wor
k At
titud
es
Ratin
g (SC
ORE)
Not
at a
ll (0
)
Som
e-tim
es
(1)
Mos
t of
the
time
(2)
All
the
time
(3)
1.
I a
m h
ones
t and
trut
hful
in a
ll m
y de
alin
gs.
2.
I a
m a
ppro
acha
ble
and
easy
to ta
lk w
ith.
3.
I a
m w
illin
g to
lear
n ne
w id
eas a
nd sk
ills.
4.
I c
ontr
ibut
e id
eas a
nd m
ake
sugg
estio
ns b
ased
on
fact
s.
5.
I a
m d
ilige
nt a
nd h
ardw
orki
ng to
acc
ompl
ish th
e ob
ject
ives
of o
ur M
PA/N
.
6.
I str
ive
to p
erfo
rm m
y du
ties a
nd re
spon
sibili
ties t
o th
e be
st o
f my
abili
ties a
nd w
ithou
t any
ves
ted
inte
rest
.
7.
I a
dher
e to
the
stan
dard
s of t
rans
pare
ncy
and
acco
unta
bilit
y in
kee
ping
fina
ncia
l rec
ords
.
8.
I can
do
my
finan
cial a
nd a
dmin
istra
tive
dutie
s in
a sy
stem
atic
and
effic
ient
man
ner.
9.
I a
m m
eticu
lous
and
I al
way
s see
to it
that
the
fund
s are
spen
t wise
ly a
nd fr
ugal
ly, a
nd li
quid
ated
pro
perly
and
on
tim
e.
10
. I a
m a
lway
s cou
rteo
us a
nd re
spec
tful w
hen
com
mun
icatin
g w
ith e
very
one
rega
rdle
ss o
f the
ir ra
nk, p
ositi
on,
cond
ition
, gen
der a
nd b
elie
fs.
11
. In
the
perfo
rman
ce o
f my
dutie
s on
enfo
rcem
ent I
am
alw
ays r
espe
ctfu
l of p
eopl
e an
d th
eir r
ight
s.
12
. I a
m fa
ir an
d ho
nest
in e
nfor
cing
the
law
.
13. I
am
cour
ageo
us a
nd m
indf
ul o
f the
law
whe
n co
nduc
ting
enfo
rcem
ent a
ctiv
ities
.
14. I
am
obs
erva
nt a
nd co
nscie
ntio
us in
adh
erin
g to
the
proc
edur
es o
f enf
orce
men
t.
15. I
am
a te
am p
laye
r and
can
wor
k in
colla
bora
tion
with
oth
er e
nfor
cem
ent g
roup
s.
16
. I a
m o
rgan
ized
and
have
a sy
stem
of k
eepi
ng d
ata,
reco
rds a
nd in
form
atio
n pr
oper
ly a
nd re
adily
acc
essib
le.