compatible with various triple-frequency ppp models estimating a … · 2019-01-31 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329337708
Estimating a set of IFCBs to make IGS ionospheric-free clock product
compatible with various triple-frequency PPP models
Presentation · December 2018
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13986.68807
CITATIONS
0
3 authors, including:
Lin Pan
Wuhan University
20 PUBLICATIONS 167 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Lin Pan on 01 December 2018.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Estimating a set of IFCBs to make IGS
ionospheric-free clock product compatible
with various triple-frequency PPP models
Lin Pan, Xiaohong Zhang, Jingnan Liu
School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University
Benefit: formation of inter-frequency combinations with
good features; increased measurement redundancy
Challenge : satellite clock inconsistency
BDS-2: B1/B2/B3
BDS-3/3S: B1/B3/B1C/B2a/B2b
Galileo: E1/E5A/E5B/E5(A+B)/E6
GPS Block IIF: L1/L2/L5
GLONASS-K/GLONASS-M: G1/G2/G3
QZSS: L1/L2/L5
1. A newly emerging situation
Montenbruck et al. (2010) identified the presence of time-, signal- and
satellite-dependent line biases in carrier phase observations.
iiriri ddTItctcP ,dd
iviciriiri bbbNTItctc ,,,dd
)()(dd 2,2,121,1,1222,1211,1212, vvIF babadadatctc
Code and carrier-phase observations:
L1/L5 IF satellite clocks:
IGS satellite clocks (L1/L2 ionospheric-free (IF) satellite clocks):
IFCBd
)()(dd
12,
5,2,151,1,1552,1511,1515,
IF
vvIF
tc
babadadatctc
)( 2
2
2
1
2
11,12 fffa )( 2
2
2
1
2
22,12 fffa
)( 2
5
2
1
2
52,15 fffa )( 2
5
2
1
2
11,15 fffa
2. IGS satellite clocks
Kept consistent with Inter-Frequency Clock Bias (IFCB)
Satellite clock determination (Guo and Geng 2017): IF-PPP1 & UC-PPP
Least-squares adjustment (Montenbruck et al. 2012): IF-PPP1
Epoch-differenced (ED) strategy (Li et al. 2016): IF-PPP1
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
IF-PPP1:L1/L2 IF+L1/L5 IF
IF-PPP2:L1/L2/L5 IF (infinite number of combs.
with only two conditions)
UC-PPP:L1 UC+L2 UC+L5 UC
IFCB(IF-PPP1) IFCB(IF-PPP2) IFCB(UC-PPP)
Relationship?
The current IFCB estimation
approach should be modified
from time to time
Introduction of IFCB:
15,15,12,15, dd IFIFIFIF tctc
5,2,151,1,152,2,121,1,1215, vvvvIF babababa
),(DCB),(DCB 512,15212,12
52,1511,1522,1211,1215,
PPaPPa
dadadadaIF
Code-specific IFCB (CIFCB):
Phase-specific IFCB (PIFCB):
IFCB (IF-PPP1: L1/L2 IF+L1/L5 IF)
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
5151
2121
),(DCB
),(DCB
ddPP
ddPP
Triple-frequency GFIF (Geometry-Free and Ionospheric-Free)
carrier phase combinations:
PIFCB observation equation
GFIF,GFIF,GFIF15,
GFIF,GFIF,GFIF5,2,151,1,152,2,121,1,12
52,1511,1522,1211,12
)()(
)()(GFIF
crIF
crvvvv
bbN
bbNbabababa
aaaa
)(GFIF GFIF,GFIF,GFIF15, crIF bbN
)()(
)()(
)()(
5,2,151,1,152,2,121,1,12GFIF,
5,2,151,1,152,2,121,1,12GFIF,
52,1511,1522,1211,12GFIF
ccccc
rrrrr
babababab
babababab
NaNaNaNaN
IFCB (IF-PPP1: L1/L2 IF+L1/L5 IF)
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
Estimation process of PIFCB:
)1(GFIF)(GFIF)1,(,15, tttt s
r
s
r
s
rIF
)1,(
1
)1,(
1
,15,15, )1,()1,()1,()1,(ttn
r
s
r
ttn
r
s
r
s
rIF
s
IF ttwttwtttt
40)1,(1
40)1,()1,(sin)1,(
ttel
ttelttelttw
s
r
s
r
s
rs
r
t
tj
s
IF
s
IF
s
IF jjtt1
15,015,15,
0
)1,()()(
Eliminating stable terms with
ED processing
A weighted average of solutions
over the entire network
The PIFCB at each epoch can be
obtained with an accumulation
IFCB (IF-PPP1: L1/L2 IF+L1/L5 IF)
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
Li et al. (2016): ED strategy
5,5,12,5,
2,2,12,2,
1,1,12,1,
dd
dd
dd
UCUCIFUC
UCUCIFUC
UCUCIFUC
tctc
tctc
tctc
0
0
),(DCB),(DCB
),(DCB
),(DCB
2,
1,
51212,125,
211,122,
212,121,
UC
UC
UC
UC
UC
PPPPa
PPa
PPa
DCB is used to compute the
L1, L2 and L5 UC CIFCB
Both L1 and L2 UC PIFCB equal
to 0, while an extra consideration of
L5 UC PIFCB is necessary
L1/L2 IF satellite clocks are converted into
uncombined (UC) satellite clocks with
estimated L1, L2 and L5 UC CIFCB and
PIFCB
IFCB (UC-PPP: L1 UC+L2 UC+L5 UC)
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
5,,55,5
,22,2
,1,1
5,2,52,121,522,125,5
2,2,121,121,1,122,2
2,2,121,2,121,12,1
d
d
d
])1()([d
])(2[d
]2)([d
UCEEEr
EEEr
EEEr
UCvvPPPUCEEr
vvEEr
vvEEr
NTItc
NTItc
NTItc
babagTItcP
baabaTItcP
babaaTItcP
2,52,121,2,1251,1255,5,5,5
2,22,121,2,1221,1222,2,2,2
2,2,121,2,121,1211,1,1,1
5,2,52,121,1,122,125
1,2,2,121,2,2,12
2,2,121,1,12,
)1()(
)1()(
2)(
)1()(
)()(
dd
rrcrE
rrcrE
rrcrE
rrrPPPUC
vvrrE
rrrEr
dadaadbbNN
dadaadbbNN
dadaadbbNN
ddadaag
bbaddaII
dadatctc
The UC triple-frequency
PPP observation equations
after applying the L1, L2
and L5 UC satellite clocks
IFCB (UC-PPP: L1 UC+L2 UC+L5 UC)
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
5,2,52,121,251,125, )1()1( vvvUC bbaba
5,2,152,2,121,1,151,12
5,2,151,1,152,2,121,1,1215,
)( vvv
vvvvIF
bababaa
babababa
15,5,2,152,2,121,1,151,122,155, )( IFvvvUC bababaaa
2,1515,5, aIFUC
)( 2
2
2
1
2
11,12 fffa )( 2
2
2
1
2
22,12 fffa
)( 2
5
2
1
2
52,15 fffa )( 2
5
2
1
2
11,15 fffa
L1/L5 IF PIFCB:
Formulating the L5
UC PIFCB
The estimated L1/L5 IF
PIFCB can be converted
into L5 UC PIFCB
Coefficients for L1/L2 and
L1/L5 IF combinations
IFCB (UC-PPP: L1 UC+L2 UC+L5 UC)
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
0
1
55221
521
eee
eee
)()(dd 5,52,21,1552211125, vvvIF bebebedededetctc
125,125,12,125, dd IFIFIFIF tctc
CIFCB
Theoretical
formula
Introduction of similar IFCBs
The combination coefficients
fulfill these two conditions
IFCB (IF-PPP2: L1/L2/L5 IF )
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
),(DCB),(DCB)(
)()(
515212,122
55221122,1211,12125,
PPePPae
dedededadaIF
Formulating the
L1/L2/L5 IF PIFCB
5,52,21,1
5,52,21,12,2,121,1,12125,
vvv
vvvvvIF
bcbcbc
bebebebaba
55
22,122
11,121
ec
eac
eac
0
0
55221
521
ccc
ccc
5
2
52
5
2
251
1
1
1
cc
cc
55,2,
2
51,
2
25
55,2,
2
51,
2
25
5,52,5
2
51,5
2
25125,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ebbb
cbbb
bcbcbc
vvv
vvv
vvvIF
2,15515,125, aeIFIF
Three combination
coefficients in L1/L2/L5
IF PIFCB
The estimated L1/L5 IF PIFCB can also be
converted into L1/L2/L5 IF PIFCB
Various L1/L2/L5 IF PIFCBs
are proportionally correlated
with each other
IFCB (IF-PPP2: L1/L2/L5 IF )
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
L1/L2-L1/L5IF PIFCB
(L1/L5)
UC PIFCB
(L5)
IF PIFCB
(L1/L2/L5)
transformation
Estimation
DCB products
IF satellite clocks
( L1/L2, L1/L5)
UC satellite clocks
(L1、L2、L5)
IF satellite clocks
(L1/L2/L5)
IF triple-
frequency users
( L1/L2, L1/L5 )
UC triple-
frequency users
( L1、L2、L5 )
IF triple-
frequency users
( L1/L2/L5 )
Estimation Service User
IGS satellite clocks
Satellite clocks for various triple-frequency PPP models
3. Mathematical conversion formula among various IFCBs
transformation
PIFCB estimates for UC-PPP, IF-PPP2 and IF-PPP1 on
April 8, 2017
4. Results
PIFCB estimates
-0.15
0
0.15
-0.15
0
0.15
-0.15
0
0.15
Inte
r-F
requency C
lock B
ias (
m)
-0.15
0
0.15
-0.15
0
0.15
0 4 8 12 16 20
-0.15
0
0.15
Time (hour)
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Time (hour)
IF-PPP1
IF-PPP2
UC-PPP
G01 G03
G06 G08
G09 G10
G24 G25
G26 G27
G30 G32
Amplitude:
4–16 cm
Positioning accuracy
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
East
(m)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Nort
h (
m)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Up (
m)
Time (hour)
Without PIFCB
With PIFCB
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
East
(m)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10N
ort
h (
m)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Up (
m)
Time (hour)
Without PIFCB
With PIFCB
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
East
(m)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Nort
h (
m)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Up (
m)
Time (hour)
Without PIFCB
With PIFCB
Epoch-wise RMS values of UC-PPP (left), IF-PPP2 (middle) and
IF-PPP1 (right) positioning errors without and with PIFCB
consideration for different observational lengths
8->5 (38%)
6->4 (33%)
13->9 (31%)
8->4 (50%)
5->3 (40%)
13->10 (23%)
6->4 (33%)
4->3 (25%)
12->10 (17%)
4. Results
Distribution of convergence time for 24-h UC-PPP solutions
0
2
4
6
8
10EastP
erc
enta
ges (
%)
North Up
0 30 60 900
2
4
6
8
0 30 60 90
Convergence Time (min)
0 30 60 90 120
Without PIFCB
With PIFCB
Mean: 24.5 min
Mean: 20.3 min
Mean: 8.1 min
Mean: 8.0 min
Mean: 30.1 min
Mean: 23.5 min
Improvement :
17%、1%、22%
4. Results
Convergence time
Phase observation residuals for UC triple-frequency PPP at
stations AJAC and CEBR on April 2, 2017
4. Results
Phase observation residual
Epoch-wise satellite EWL UPD estimates without (left) and
with (right) PIFCB consideration on April 2, 2017
4. Results
Extra-Wide-Lane (EWL) UPD estimates
0 4 8 12 16 20 24-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
GPS Time (hour)
Extr
a-W
ide-L
ane U
PD
(cycle
)
0 4 8 12 16 20 24-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
GPS Time (hour)E
xtr
a-W
ide-L
ane U
PD
(cycle
)
1All the new-generation GNSS satellites are designed to
transmit signals on three or more frequencies. The
satellite clock consistency must be ensured.
2The mathematical conversion formula among the
PIFCBs of different triple-frequency PPP models is
rigorously derived.
3After applying the PIFCB corrections, the positioning
accuracy, convergence time, phase observation residuals,
and EWL UPD estimates are significantly improved.
5. Conclusions
Thank You for Your Attention!
More details refer to our recently published paper:
Pan L, et al. 2018. Journal of Geodesy.
doi:10.1007/s00190-018-1176-5View publication statsView publication stats