companies act 1956 vs 2013

12
COMPANIES ACT,2013 V/s COMPANIES ACT,1956 By : MOHIT KUMAR SECTION B MBA 1 ST SEMESTER

Upload: mohit-kumar

Post on 11-Dec-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

companies act 1956 vs 2013

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

COMPANIES ACT,2013V/s

COMPANIES ACT,1956

By:

MOHIT KUMARSECTION B

MBA 1ST SEMESTER

Page 2: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

2008

• Companies bill Introduced in Lok sabha on 23rd October 2008 for the first time, to replace 52 year old Companies Act , 1956

2012

• Companies Bill passed in Lok Sabha on 18th December 2012

2013

• Bill passed in Rajya Sabha on 8th August 2013

2013

• Enacted as Companies Act 2013, with President assent on 29th August 2013

Milestones in making COMPANIES ACT,2013 enforceable…

Page 3: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

Need For New Companies Act

Page 4: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

Structural Comparison

Companies Act 1956

13 Parts

658 SectionsAnd

15 Schedules

Companies Act 2013

29 Chapters

470 Sections And

7 Schedules

Page 5: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

CAPTIONOLD COMPANIES

ACT 1956.NEW COMPANIES

ACT 2013.

Members

There are maximum of 50 members.

There are maximum number of 200 members.

One personCompany

Does not exists.The concept of one person company was introduced to form a private limited company.

In-corporation

It can be treated has conclusive evidence.

It cant be treated has conclusive evidence because action can be taken even after incorporation.

Page 6: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

CAPTION OLD COMPANIES ACT 1956.

NEW COMPANIES ACT 2013.

Memorandum of association

It consists of name clause, situation clause, object clause, subscription clause, etc.,.

It consists of all the clauses but in object clause the sub-clause named other objectives is excluded.

Articles of association

It has companies limited by share, limited by guarantee & unlimited companies.

No changes have been done in this regard.

Resident Director

No such provision existed.

Every company shall have one director who lives in India for a period of 180 days for last calendar year.

Page 7: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

CAPTION

OLD COMPANIES ACT 1956

NEW COMPANIES ACT 2013.

E-governance

No such provision existed.

Inspection of documents in electronic form is made.

Women director

No such provision existed.

In prescribed companies classes or class women can be a director.

Maximum no. of

Directors

Max. no of directors are 12 not beyond them with approval of central govt.

Number increased to 15 but by passing with special resolution .

Page 8: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

CAPTION

OLD COMPANIES ACT 1956

NEW COMPANIES ACT 2013.

Applicability of law

It is acceptable whole India except in Sikkim has they has their own company’s act.

It is applicable to whole India.

Issue of bonus shares

No such provision existed. However rules framed in unlisted public company.

Private limited company’s are not permitted to issue bonus shares.(clause 63 and 23)

Exit option of share holder

No such provision existed.Share holders can have exit option if money raised has not been utilised.

Page 9: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

CAPTION

OLD COMPANIES ACT 1956

NEW COMPANIES ACT 2013.

Corporate Social

Responsibility(C.S.R.)

• No provisions for CSR initiatives

• Constitution of corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.)Committee of the board is compulsory for companies:

- Having turnover of rupees 1000 crore or more or-a net profit of rupees 5 crore during financial year.

• Every financial year at least 2% of the average net profits to be spent on CSR activities,

Page 10: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

Through Section 132 of  the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government has introduced a new regulatory authority named as National Authority for Financial Reporting known as National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) with wide powers to recommended, enforce and monitor the compliance of accounting and auditing standards.

NFRA shall be responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance of auditing and accounting standards and for that purpose, oversee the quality of professions associated with ensuring such compliances.

NFRA

Page 11: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013

Forbes Magazine India Listed The Companies Who Are Contributing For

CSR

Page 12: Companies Act 1956 vs 2013