community recovery planning – new yorkmedia2.planning.org/media/npc2017/presentation/s658.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Community Recovery Planning – New York
APA Conference; May 9, 2017
Lawrence Frank Atkins North America Barry Hokanson
22 May 2017 1
What is a disaster? • Extraordinary event that disrupts a
city or area’s equilibrium; caused by different sources
• Causes damage; people’s lives and health at risk
• Disruption = lost time and lost opportunity
• Loss of confidence in the city
22 May 2017 2
What is a disaster? So what is a response? Or recovery? • Undo the damage? Return to normal? Better than before?
What is better? • What was lost? What can be gained? • Where are the hidden opportunities? • How long before success is realized – it may not look like much
2 years post but 10 year later it could be a very big success (timeframe)
22 May 2017 3
Silver Lining? - Unique Opportunities Characteristics of disasters that help communities advance forward with resiliency:
• Accelerate plans to redevelop
• Need to rebuild damaged structures
• Availability of federal / state / private resources to rebuild
• “Teachable moment” (reverse is disaster amnesia)
• Chance to retain knowledgeable staff that build on lessons learned and better institutionalize resiliency
• Likely to produce an unprecedented focus on community, availability of resources and attention paid by residents – how to leverage it
22 May 2017 4
Significant Challenges in Recovery
• Rush to rebuild “as was”
• Hardship in terms of safety, time, logistics and cost
• Huge burden of cleanup (time / energy / funding)
• Severe disruption of services, infrastructure and displacement of people
22 May 2017 5
Significant Challenges in Recovery
• Many activities occurring at the same time
• Lack of information to guide rebuild
• “Fog of War” confusion – contradictory guidance, rumors, lack of information, etc.
22 May 2017 6
How do we approach it? • Hedge against these issues – prior planning and
coordination (act of planning itself) • Balance between rapid recovery and consideration for
rebuild o Faster and more efficient recovery o Build back better
• Find your local champions / advance community’s vision • What are common characteristics of a successful
recovery….
22 May 2017 7
Question How do we determine local and community needs?
22 May 2017 8
Question In a recovery, how do we choose between getting people back into their homes, re-opening closed schools, infrastructure rebuilt or rebuilding a critical economic generator (e.g., a boardwalk in a beach community) if time and resources constrain simultaneous work? 22 May 2017 9
Question Often the news shows the military and emergency managers leading a recovery. What is the planner’s role in a recovery?
22 May 2017 10
Unique Planning Opportunity
22 May 2017 11
Source: article by Olshansky, 2006 (p.153)
“Post-disaster recovery is all about urban planning. This is not an area that we can leave to emergency managers, engineers, architects, the military, insurers, or bankers. Recovery, like planning, is all about creating livable, sustainable place for people to live and work. The fact that it takes places under extreme circumstances, and demands rapid action with severely constrained resources, requires the expertise that planners have to offer.”
Below the surface factors People issues – beyond engineering & intricate plans • PSYCHOLOGICAL
– Visuals - e.g., scrub out or paint over high water marks – Ear to the ground - what are your friends and neighbors doing? – Don’t underestimate how much people identify with their community - plant the
flag around important anchors and rally – Change is coming – embrace it – Welcome new faces and new ideas – Many meetings, processes and visits by teams will occur – BE PATIENT! – If the vision is sound, stay with it! Stay the course. Avoid second-guessing.
• FINANCIAL – From company’s perspective – is this a good place to re-invest? – Is your job going to be there? 22 May 2017 12
Key points for consideration in recovery
Identify risk and unmet needs – decision points • Obtain resources • Substantial changes / retain institutional knowledge / capacity building (not
just a one-off event) • Some level of public engagement / continue it • Risk reduction/rebuilding and/or co-benefits (economics/environmental) –
incorporate mitigation into rebuilding • Local and regional approach – select appropriate economic development
approach
22 May 2017 13
Key points for consideration
Identify risk and unmet needs – decision points (cont.) • Use disaster information for higher risk management standards • Grey versus green infrastructure / natural resources • Restore ‘as was’ or new vision • Pre-planning existent? – either a redevelopment plan (not just recovery),
master plan, etc.
22 May 2017 14
Key points for consideration in recovery
Identify risk and unmet needs – decision points (cont.) • Identify specific strategies, projects and policies • Obtain necessary resources and implement • Focus on restoring a few key anchors and critical infrastructure in the
community • Housing, small businesses • Vulnerable populations
22 May 2017 15
Question How can a community at considerable risk to natural hazards, but has not experienced a large disaster in at least 30 years, still do pre-planning to prepare for one? 22 May 2017 16
Use of Technology
22 May 2017 17
Technology is an essential tool to help decision-makers chart a course to better understand their risk and assist on all fronts.
ARC Population Projection
Parcel-scale growth forecasting
SFWMD WCS Tracker Tool
Real time water budgets over South Florida
Climate Science-based approach to forecasting local storm activity
Merges general circulation model projections of global climate change with
historical rainfall data.
BMP Designer Residents design their
own stormwater controls around Lake Tahoe
Use of Technology
22 May 2017 18
Comprehensive city planning tools that projects city growth and future risk to storms. .
Question In a recovery, do we have time for innovative approaches?
22 May 2017 19
Summary of Recovery Approaches in Different States to Different Hazards • FLOOD – two towns in Wisconsin • TORNADO - Greensburg, KS • DROUGHT / WILDFIRE / FLOOD - Colorado Springs • HURRICANE / Storm Surge - New York Community
Reconstruction Planning • HURRICANE / Inland Flooding & Extreme Rainfall - North
Carolina Resilient Redevelopment Planning
22 May 2017 20
A tale of two Wisconsin towns
22 May 2017 21
Darlington, WI Save the Downtown • Downtown business district
near river • Could not elevate building but
did elevate floors within buildings
Relocate Industrial Uses • Removed an industrial park in
the floodplain to a location outside floodplain
Gays Mills, WI Relocated the city’s commercial district out of the floodplain
Photo source: Royalbroil
Greensburg, KC
Completely wiped out by a tornado Complete reinvention to a green city • Greatest concentration of LEED certified buildings in
the country • 100 percent of town’s energy from solar and wind
22 May 2017 22
Photo Source: NOAA Photo Library
Colorado Springs Massive fire in 2012 caused significant damage and then increased flows to several streams intown • Made changes to building code for wildfire (roofs to
resist ignition from embers)
• Studied post-fire flows, projects to dissipate flood energy, and advised residents to buy flood insurance (large uptick in policy purchases post-fire)
• Created a more substantial on-going commitment to addressing hazards
22 May 2017 23 Photo source: City of Colorado Springs
New York – Community Reconstruction Planning CDBG regulations drove some of it • Extensive Public Engagement • Resident Committee Approach • Development of Projects • Co-Benefits • Some Cost Effectiveness • Widespread Groups Represented • Coincides with Long Island Revitalization efforts
22 May 2017 24
New York – Community Reconstruction Planning
22 May 2017 25
Project Types – Multiple lines / layers of defense • Coastal/Perimeter Flood Protection • Shoreline/Beach/Marsh Restoration • Stormwater Drainage Improvements • Critical Facility Resiliency • Public Health and Safety • Revitalization and Development
New York – Community Reconstruction Planning
22 May 2017 26
National Disaster Recovery Framework
Recovery Support Functions. • Infrastructure • Natural and Cultural Resources • Health and Social Services • Community Planning and Capacity Building • Economic • Housing
22 May 2017 27
North Carolina Resilient Redevelopment Planning Cumberland County and the City of Fayetteville were already addressing resiliency • Cumberland County Climate
Resiliency Plan • Fayetteville Resiliency Element
for Comprehensive Plan
22 May 2017 28
Thank you!!
If you’d like to find out more visit: www.atkinsglobal.com
© Atkins Limited except where stated otherwise.
The Atkins logo, ‘Carbon Critical Design’ and the strapline ‘Plan Design Enable’ are trademarks of Atkins Limited. 22 May 2017 29
Lawrence Frank [email protected] Barry Hokanson [email protected]
1
HMDR Hazard Mitigation & Disaster Recovery Planning Division
LinkedIn = 570, Dues paying = 262
NHMA Natural Hazard Mitigation Association
APA American Planning Association
(40,000 members)
APA Staff Hazards Planning Center
Recovery News (blog)
Policy Guide on Hazard Mitigation.
Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery: Next Generation
Hazard Mitigation: Integrating Best Practices into Planning
Other:
ASFPM Association of State Floodplain Managers
Other Divisions (21) Transportation, Housing & Community Development,
Regional and Intergovernmental, Planning & Law, Economic Development, New Urbanism, Environment, Natural
Resources & Energy, Sustainable Communities, Urban Design & Preservation, Technology, Sustainable Communities, etc.
Other Policy Guides
Planning.org
HMDRPLN.com
NHMA.info
Flood.org
Pre-Disaster Plan Integration
Comprehensive Plan
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Disaster Recovery Plan
CDBG Action Plan (1 yr)
Consolidated Plan (5 yr)
Capital Improvement Program (10 yr)
Post-Disaster Plan Integration
(REVISE)
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Comprehensive Plan
Economic Development Strategy
Community Development Strategy
inform the
Recovery Policies
Long Term Recovery Plan (Post-Disaster)influences/
determinesRecovery Policies & Projects
which sets the stage for
Pre-Disaster Recovery Plan
PRE-EVENT CONDITIONSPerformance of Community Service
Systems and Socioeconomic Systems
influences
Including strategies of reconfiguring and redeveloping areas
that may require the updating of
HMDRPLN.com
Community Plans
Incident Action Plan (IAP)
Public Assistance – Project Worksheets (PWs)
ESF 1 TransportationESF 2 CommunicationsESF 3 Public Works & EngineeringESF 4 Firefighting ESF 5 Emergency ManagementESF 6 Mass Care, Emergency Assistance, Housing & Human Services SupportESF 7 Logistics Management & Resource Support
EVENT
Individual Assistance
Emergency Support Functions
Community Recovery Plan
Public AssistanceCategories of Work
Field InspectionsProject Engineering/Architectural Specs
Project Approval, Budget Approval, Obligation of FundsProject Design, Construction Bids
Construction
Hurricanes Katrina/Rita in LouisianaTotal PWs = 35,941
Comprehensive PlanCommunity Development PlanConsolidated PlanHazard Mitigation PlanCapital Improvements Program
Economic Development Strategy
National Incident Management System (NIMS) Incident Command System (ICS)
National Preparedness Goal & PPD-8
Long-Term Recovery Committee (& VOAD)
Emergency Support Functions
National Disaster Recovery Framework
National Planning Frameworks (5)
Pre-Disaster Recovery Plan
Economic Incentives, Job GrowthInfrastructure, Acquisitions Structural Mitigation, ResiliencePublic-Private PartnershipsNGO CoordinationFinancing Strategies
Development LayoutsRedevelopment, New PatternsNeighborhood RevitalizationHousing InvestmentsHuman Service InitiativesInput from First Responders
Recovery Phase 1
Recovery Phase ...
PWs Plan Adoption Schedule Katrina, NOLA = 16 months
Sandy, NY = 17 months
ESF 8 Public Health & Medical ServicesESF 9 Search and RescueESF 10 Oil and Hazardous MaterialsESF 11 Agriculture & Natural ResourcesESF 12 EnergyESF 13 Public Safety and SecurityESF 14 (replaced by NDRF)ESF 15 External Affairs
National Preparedness
Human Services Strategy
Area Redevelopment Plans
Pre-DisasterRecovery Plan
Organizational ArrangementsAssessments of Community Resilience, Socioeconomic Vulnerabilities, Systems Status of Programs for Infrastructure, Economic Development, Social Services, Community Development and Redevelopment
TIME
HMGP $, CDBG $, other $
RecoverySupport
Functions (6)
Recovery Elements Timeline
Address an immediate threat:A Debris removalB Emergency
protective measures
Restoration of:C Roads/bridgesD Water control facilities E Buildings / equipmentF UtilitiesG Parks, recreational and
other facilities
Emergency Work Permanent Work
PROCESS TIMELINEHMDRRI Community Recovery Plan Development and Implementation
Assemble Facts Recommend ScopePropose Elements
and Process
Assemble Teams Plan Development
SCHEDULE = 9 to 12 months for plan development
Early Outputs,
Decision Support,
Special Projects(2 meetings)PLAN START-UP
Conditions Inventory
Identify Needs
FEMA IA
FEMA PA
CDBG-DR
HMGP
EDA
SBA
COG
County
UNC Planning
NCSU School of Design
etc
Alternatives Development
Public Workshops
Funding Strategies
Detailed Area / Neighborhood Plans
Review by Advisory Groups,
Commissions, Agencies, COGs
Deliberation & Adoption
by Governing Body
Team Visits to
Communities
Fair Bluff 3-15-17
Lumberton 3-9-17
Kinston 3-16-17
Seven Springs 3-10-17
Princeville 3-6-17
Windsor 3-17-17
Consensus on Key
Issues
¨ Fair Bluff
¨ Lumberton
¨ Kinston
¨ Seven Springs
¨ Princeville
¨ Windsor
GIS Database
Identify Agency POCs
Public Workshops
Data Sharing Workshop
Detailed Scope &
Schedule
¨ Fair Bluff
¨ Lumberton
¨ Kinston
¨ Seven Springs
¨ Princeville
¨ Windsor
Program Resources & Schedules
State Agencies
NCEM
NCDOT
NCHHS
NCDEQ
CGIA
etc
SPECIAL
PROJECTSsuch as Kenan-Flagler
/ Skanska
In Princeville
(rev 4-18-17)
Þ
IMPLEMENTATION(see note below)
Community projects and plans will vary in complexity and development time. Some communities will be ready to start
planning process sooner than others. Resources such as GIS and research support are not yet fully identified, to be
determined by about 4/18/17. Implementation support is assumed to be 12 months through 2018.
NOTES:
DESIGN PROJECTS
& POLICY
Pattern Book
Greenways
Resending Strategies
Leadership
FeedbackLeadership Buy-in Early Outputs,
Decision Support,
Special Projects
Practitioners,
Faculty, Students
APPLIED
RESEARCH
Recovery
Indicators
Flood APEX
Infrastructure
Study
Project
Development
C