communications in computer and information science 81
TRANSCRIPT
Eyke Hüllermeier Rudolf KruseFrank Hoffmann (Eds.)
Information Processingand Management ofUncertainty inKnowledge-Based Systems
Applications
13th International Conference, IPMU 2010Dortmund, Germany, June 28 – July 2, 2010Proceedings, Part II
13
Volume Editors
Eyke HüllermeierPhilipps-Universität MarburgMarburg, GermanyE-mail: [email protected]
Rudolf KruseOtto-von-Guericke-Universität MagdeburgMagdeburg, GermanyE-mail: [email protected]
Frank HoffmannTechnische Universität DortmundDortmund, GermanyE-mail: [email protected]
Library of Congress Control Number: 2010929196
CR Subject Classification (1998): I.2, H.3, F.1, H.4, I.5, I.4
ISSN 1865-0929ISBN-10 3-642-14057-2 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New YorkISBN-13 978-3-642-14057-0 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material isconcerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting,reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publicationor parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965,in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liableto prosecution under the German Copyright Law.
springer.com
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010Printed in Germany
Typesetting: Camera-ready by author, data conversion by Scientific Publishing Services, Chennai, IndiaPrinted on acid-free paper 06/3180
Preface
The International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Un-certainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, IPMU, is organized every two years withthe aim of bringing together scientists working on methods for the managementof uncertainty and aggregation of information in intelligent systems. Since 1986,this conference has been providing a forum for the exchange of ideas betweentheoreticians and practitioners working in these areas and related fields. The 13th
IPMU conference took place in Dortmund, Germany, June 28–July 2, 2010.This volume contains 77 papers selected through a rigorous reviewing pro-
cess. The contributions reflect the richness of research on topics within the scopeof the conference and represent several important developments, specifically fo-cused on applications of methods for information processing and managementof uncertainty in knowledge-based systems.
We were delighted that Melanie Mitchell (Portland State University, USA),Nihkil R. Pal (Indian Statistical Institute), Bernhard Scholkopf (Max Planck Ins-titute for Biological Cybernetics, Tubingen, Germany) and Wolfgang Wahlster(German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Saarbrucken) accepted ourinvitations to present keynote lectures. Jim Bezdek received the Kampe de FerietAward, granted every two years on the occasion of the IPMU conference, in viewof his eminent research contributions to the handling of uncertainty in clustering,data analysis and pattern recognition.
Organizing a conference like this one is not possible without the assistanceand continuous support of many people and institutions. We are particularlygrateful to the organizers of sessions on dedicated topics that took place duringthe conference—these ‘special sessions’ have always been a characteristic ele-ment of the IPMU conference. Frank Klawonn and Thomas Runkler helped alot to evaluate and select special session proposals. The special session organizersthemselves rendered important assistance in the reviewing process, that was fur-thermore supported by the Area Chairs and regular members of the ProgrammeCommittee. Thomas Fober was the backbone on several organizational and elec-tronic issues, and also helped with the preparation of the proceedings. In thisregard, we would also like to thank Alfred Hofmann and Springer for providingcontinuous assistance and ready advice whenever needed.
Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the support of several organizations andinstitutions, notably the German Informatics Society (Gesellschaft fur Infor-matik, GI), the German Research Foundation (DFG), the European Societyfor Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT), the International Fuzzy SystemsAssociation (IFSA), the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society(NAFIPS) and the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society.
April 2010 Eyke HullermeierRudolf Kruse
Frank Hoffmann
Organization
Conference Committee
General Chair Eyke Hullermeier (Philipps-Universitat Marburg)Co-chairs Frank Hoffmann (Technische Universitat Dortmund)
Rudolf Kruse (Otto-von-Guericke Universitat Magdeburg)Frank Klawonn (Hochschule Braunschweig-Wolfenbuttel)Thomas Runkler (Siemens AG, Munich)
Web Chair Thomas Fober (Philipps-Universitat Marburg)Executive
Directors Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier (LIP6, Paris, France)Ronald R. Yager (Iona College, USA)
International Advisory Board
G. Coletti, Italy C. Marsala, France L. Valverde, SpainM. Delgado, Spain M. Ojeda-Aciego, Spain J.L. Verdegay, SpainL. Foulloy, France M. Rifqi, France M.A. Vila, SpainJ. Gutierrez-Rios, Spain L. Saitta, Italy L.A. Zadeh, USAL. Magdalena, Spain E. Trillas, Spain
Special Session Organizers
P. Angelov F. Hoffmann B. Prados SuarezA. Antonucci S. Kaci M. PreußC. Beierle J. Kacprzyk A. RalescuG. Beliakov G. Kern-Isberner D. RalescuG. Bordogna C. Labreuche E. ReucherA. Bouchachia H. Legind Larsen W. RodderH. Bustince E. William De Luca S. RomanıT. Calvo E. Lughofer G. RudolphP. Carrara E. Marchioni G. RußJ. Chamorro Martınez N. Marin D. SanchezD. Coquin M. Minoh R. SeisingT. Denoeux G. Navarro-Arribas A. SkowronP. Eklund H. Son Nguyen D. SlezakZ. Elouedi V. Novak O. StraussM. Fedrizzi P. Melo Pinto E. SzmidtJ. Fernandez E. Miranda S. TerminiT. Flaminio V.A. Niskanen V. TorraL. Godo D. Ortiz-Arroyo L. ValetM. Grabisch I. Perfilieva A. VallsA.J. Grichnik O. Pons R.R. Yager
VIII Organization
International Programme Committee
Area ChairsP. Bosc, France L. Godo, Spain R. Mesiar, SloveniaO. Cordon, Spain F. Gomide, Spain D. Sanchez, SpainG. De Cooman, Belgium M. Grabisch, France R. Seising, SpainT. Denoeux, France F. Herrera, Spain R. Slowinski, PolandR. Felix, Germany L. Magdalena, Spain
Regular Members
P. Angelov, UKJ.A. Appriou, FranceM. Baczynski, PolandG. Beliakov, AustraliaS. Ben Yahia, TunisiaS. Benferat, FranceH. Berenji, USAJ. Bezdek, USAI. Bloch, FranceU. Bodenhofer, AustriaP.P. Bonissone, USAC. Borgelt, SpainH. Bustince, SpainR. Casadio, ItalyY. Chalco-Cano, ChileC.A. Coello Coello,
MexicoI. Couso, SpainB. De Baets, BelgiumG. De Tre, BelgiumM. Detyniecki, FranceD. Dubois, FranceF. Esteva, SpainM. Fedrizzi, ItalyJ. Fodor, HungaryD. Fogel, USAK. Fujimoto, JapanP. Gallinari, FranceB. Gerla, ItalyM.A. Gil, SpainS. Gottwald, GermanyS. Grossberg, USA
P. Hajek,Czech Republic
L. Hall, USAE. Herrera-Viedma,
SpainC. Noguera, SpainK. Hirota, JapanA. Hunter, UKH. Ishibuchi, JapanY. Jin, GermanyJ. Kacprzyk, PolandA. Kandel, USAG. Kern-Isberner,
GermanyE.P. Klement, AustriaL. Koczy, HungaryV. Kreinovich, USAT. Kroupa,
Czech RepublicC. Labreuche, FranceJ. Lang, FranceP. Larranaga, SpainH. Larsen, DenmarkA. Laurent, FranceM.J. Lesot, FranceC.J. Liau, TaiwanW. Lodwick, USAJ.A. Lozano, SpainT. Lukasiewicz, UKF. Marcelloni, ItalyJ.L. Marichal,
Luxembourg
N. Marin, SpainT. Martin, UKL. Martinez, SpainJ. Medina, SpainJ. Mendel, USAE. Miranda, SpainP. Miranda, SpainJ. Montero, SpainS. Moral, SpainM. Nachtegael, BelgiumY. Nojima, JapanV. Novak,
Czech RepublicH. Nurmi, FinlandE. Pap, SerbiaW. Pedrycz, CanadaF. Petry, USAV. Piuri, ItalyO. Pivert, FranceP. Poncelet, FranceH. Prade, FranceA. Ralescu, USAD. Ralescu, USAM. Ramdani, MoroccoM. Reformat, CanadaD. Ruan, BelgiumE. Ruspini, USAR. Scozzafava, ItalyP. Shenoy, USAG. Simari, ArgentinaP. Sobrevilla, SpainU. Straccia, Italy
Organization IX
T. Stutzle, BelgiumK.C. Tan, SingaporeR. Tanscheit, BrazilS. Termini, ItalyV. Torra, Spain
I.B. Turksen, CanadaB. Vantaggi, ItalyP. Vicig, ItalyZ. Wang, USAM. Zaffalon, Switzerland
H.J. Zimmermann,Germany
J. Zurada, USA
Table of Contents – Part II
Data Analysis Applications
Data-Driven Design of Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Systems for PredictingNOx Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Edwin Lughofer, Vicente Macian, Carlos Guardiola, andErich Peter Klement
Coping with Uncertainty in Temporal Gene Expressions Using SymbolicRepresentations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Silvana Badaloni and Marco Falda
Olive Trees Detection in Very High Resolution Images . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Juan Moreno-Garcia, Luis Jimenez Linares,Luis Rodriguez-Benitez, and Cayetano J. Solana-Cipres
A Fast Recursive Approach to Autonomous Detection, Identificationand Tracking of Multiple Objects in Video Streams underUncertainties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Pouria Sadeghi-Tehran, Plamen Angelov, and Ramin Ramezani
Soft Concept Hierarchies to Summarise Data Streams and HighlightAnomalous Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Trevor Martin, Yun Shen, and Andrei Majidian
Using Enriched Ontology Structure for Improving Statistical Models ofGene Annotation Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Frank Rugheimer
Predicting Outcomes of Septic Shock Patients Using Feature SelectionBased on Soft Computing Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Andre S. Fialho, Federico Cismondi, Susana M. Vieira,Joao M.C. Sousa, Shane R. Reti, Michael D. Howell, andStan N. Finkelstein
Obtaining the Compatibility between Musicians Using SoftComputing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Teresa Leon and Vicente Liern
Consistently Handling Geographical User Data: Context-DependentDetection of Co-located POIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Guy De Tre, Antoon Bronselaer, Tom Matthe,Nico Van de Weghe, and Philippe De Maeyer
XII Table of Contents – Part II
Intelligent Databases
A Model Based on Outranking for Database Preference Queries . . . . . . . . 95Patrick Bosc, Olivier Pivert, and Gregory Smits
Incremental Membership Function Updates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105Narjes Hachani, Imen Derbel, and Habib Ounelli
A New Approach for Comparing Fuzzy Objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115Yasmina Bashon, Daniel Neagu, and Mick J. Ridley
Generalized Fuzzy Comparators for Complex Data in a FuzzyObject-Relational Database Management System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
Juan Miguel Medina, Carlos D. Barranco, Jesus R. Campana, andSergio Jaime-Castillo
The Bipolar Semantics of Querying Null Values in Regular and FuzzyDatabases: Dealing with Inapplicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Tom Matthe and Guy De Tre
Describing Fuzzy DB Schemas as Ontologies: A System ArchitectureView . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Carmen Martınez-Cruz, Ignacio J. Blanco, and M. Amparo Vila
Using Textual Dimensions in Data Warehousing Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . 158M.J. Martın-Bautista, C. Molina, E. Tejeda, and M. Amparo Vila
Information Fusion
Uncertainty Estimation in the Fusion of Text-Based Information forSituation Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
Kellyn Rein, Ulrich Schade, and Silverius Kawaletz
Aggregation of Partly Inconsistent Preference Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178Rudolf Felix
Risk Neutral Valuations Based on Partial Probabilistic Information . . . . 188Andrea Capotorti, Giuliana Regoli, and Francesca Vattari
A New Contextual Discounting Rule for Lower Probabilities . . . . . . . . . . . 198Sebastien Destercke
The Power Average Operator for Information Fusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208Ronald R. Yager
Performance Comparison of Fusion Operators in Bimodal RemoteSensing Snow Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
Aureli Soria-Frisch, Antonio Repucci, Laura Moreno, andMarco Caparrini
Table of Contents – Part II XIII
Color Recognition Enhancement by Fuzzy Merging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231Vincent Bombardier, Emmanuel Schmitt, and Patrick Charpentier
Towards a New Generation of Indicators for Consensus ReachingSupport Using Type-2 Fuzzy Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
Witold Pedrycz, Janusz Kacprzyk, and S�lawomir Zadrozny
Decision Support
Modelling Collective Choices
Multiagent Decision Making, Fuzzy Prevision, and Consensus . . . . . . . . . . 251Antonio Maturo and Aldo G.S. Ventre
A Categorical Approach to the Extension of Social Choice Functions . . . 261Patrik Eklund, Mario Fedrizzi, and Hannu Nurmi
Signatures for Assessment, Diagnosis and Decision-Making in Ageing . . . 271Patrik Eklund
Fuzzy Decision Theory
A Default Risk Model in a Fuzzy Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280Hiroshi Inoue and Masatoshi Miyake
On a Fuzzy Weights Representation for Inner Dependence AHP . . . . . . . . 289Shin-ichi Ohnishi, Takahiro Yamanoi, and Hideyuki Imai
Different Models with Fuzzy Random Variables in Single-Stage DecisionProblems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
Luis J. Rodrıguez-Muniz and Miguel Lopez-Dıaz
Applications in Finance
A Neuro-Fuzzy Decision Support System for Selection of Small ScaleBusiness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
Rajendra Akerkar and Priti Srinivas Sajja
Bond Management: An Application to the European Market . . . . . . . . . . 316Jose Manuel Brotons
Estimating the Brazilian Central Bank’s Reaction Function by FuzzyInference System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
Ivette Luna, Leandro Maciel, Rodrigo Lanna F. da Silveira, andRosangela Ballini
XIV Table of Contents – Part II
Fuzzy Systems
Philosophical Aspects
Do Uncertainty and Fuzziness Present Themselves (and Behave) in theSame Way in Hard and Human Sciences? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334
Settimo Termini
Some Notes on the Value of Vagueness in Everyday Communication . . . . 344Nora Kluck
On Zadeh’s “The Birth and Evolution of Fuzzy Logic” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350Yucel Yuksel
Complexity and Fuzziness in 20th Century Science and Technology . . . . . 356Rudolf Seising
Educational Software of Fuzzy Logic and Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366Jose Galindo and Enrique Leon-Gonzalez
Fuzzy Numbers
A Fuzzy Distance between Two Fuzzy Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376Saeid Abbasbandy and Saeide Hajighasemi
On the Jaccard Index with Degree of Optimism in Ranking FuzzyNumbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383
Nazirah Ramli and Daud Mohamad
Negation Functions in the Set of Discrete Fuzzy Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392Jaume Casasnovas and J. Vicente Riera
Trapezoidal Approximation of Fuzzy Numbers Based on SampleData . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402
Przemys�law Grzegorzewski
Multiple Products and Implications in Interval-Valued Fuzzy SetTheory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412
Glad Deschrijver
Fuzzy Ontology and Information Granulation: An Approach toKnowledge Mobilisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420
Christer Carlsson, Matteo Brunelli, and Jozsef Mezei
Adjoint Pairs on Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430Jesus Medina
Table of Contents – Part II XV
Fuzzy Arithmetic
Optimistic Arithmetic Operators for Fuzzy and Gradual Intervals -Part I: Interval Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440
Reda Boukezzoula and Sylvie Galichet
Optimistic Arithmetic Operators for Fuzzy and Gradual Intervals -Part II: Fuzzy and Gradual Interval Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451
Reda Boukezzoula and Sylvie Galichet
Model Assessment Using Inverse Fuzzy Arithmetic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461Thomas Haag and Michael Hanss
New Tools in Fuzzy Arithmetic with Fuzzy Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471Luciano Stefanini
Fuzzy Equations
Application of Gaussian Quadratures in Solving Fuzzy FredholmIntegral Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481
M. Khezerloo, Tofigh Allahviranloo, Soheil Salahshour,M. Khorasani Kiasari, and S. Haji Ghasemi
Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of Fuzzy VolterraIntegro-differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491
Saeide Hajighasemi, Tofigh Allahviranloo, M. Khezerloo,M. Khorasany, and Soheil Salahshour
Expansion Method for Solving Fuzzy Fredholm-Volterra IntegralEquations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501
S. Khezerloo, Tofigh Allahviranloo, S. Haji Ghasemi,Soheil Salahshour, M. Khezerloo, and M. Khorasan Kiasary
Solving Fuzzy Heat Equation by Fuzzy Laplace Transforms . . . . . . . . . . . . 512Soheil Salahshour and Elnaz Haghi
A New Approach for Solving First Order Fuzzy Differential Equation . . . 522Tofigh Allahviranloo and Soheil Salahshour
Soft Computing Applications
Image Processing
A Comparison Study of Different Color Spaces in Clustering BasedImage Segmentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 532
Aranzazu Jurio, Miguel Pagola, Mikel Galar,Carlos Lopez-Molina, and Daniel Paternain
XVI Table of Contents – Part II
Retrieving Texture Images Using Coarseness Fuzzy Partitions . . . . . . . . . 542Jesus Chamorro-Martınez, Pedro Manuel Martınez-Jimenez, andJose Manuel Soto-Hidalgo
A Fuzzy Regional-Based Approach for Detecting Cerebrospinal FluidRegions in Presence of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552
Francesc Xavier Aymerich, Eduard Montseny, Pilar Sobrevilla, andAlex Rovira
Probabilistic Scene Models for Image Interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562Alexander Bauer
Motion Segmentation Algorithm for Dynamic Scenes over H.264Video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 572
Cayetano J. Solana-Cipres, Luis Rodriguez-Benitez,Juan Moreno-Garcia, and L. Jimenez-Linares
Using Stereo Vision and Fuzzy Systems for Detecting and TrackingPeople . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 582
Rui Paul, Eugenio Aguirre, Miguel Garcıa-Silvente, andRafael Munoz-Salinas
Privacy and Security
Group Anonymity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592Oleg Chertov and Dan Tavrov
Anonymizing Categorical Data with a Recoding Method Based onSemantic Similarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 602
Sergio Martınez, Aida Valls, and David Sanchez
Addressing Complexity in a Privacy Expert System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 612Siani Pearson
Privacy-Protected Camera for the Sensing Web . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 622Ikuhisa Mitsugami, Masayuki Mukunoki, Yasutomo Kawanishi,Hironori Hattori, and Michihiko Minoh
Bayesian Network-Based Approaches for Severe Attack Prediction andHandling IDSs’ Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632
Karim Tabia and Philippe Leray
The Sensing Web
Structuring and Presenting the Distributed Sensory Information in theSensing Web . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 643
Rin-ichiro Taniguchi, Atsushi Shimada, Yuji Kawaguchi,Yousuke Miyata, and Satoshi Yoshinaga
Table of Contents – Part II XVII
Evaluation of Privacy Protection Techniques for Speech Signals . . . . . . . . 653Kazumasa Yamamoto and Seiichi Nakagawa
Digital Diorama: Sensing-Based Real-World Visualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663Takumi Takehara, Yuta Nakashima, Naoko Nitta, andNoboru Babaguchi
Personalizing Public and Privacy-Free Sensing Information with aPersonal Digital Assistant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 673
Takuya Kitade, Yasushi Hirano, Shoji Kajita, and Kenji Mase
The Open Data Format and Query System of the Sensing Web . . . . . . . . 680Naruki Mitsuda and Tsuneo Ajisaka
See-Through Vision: A Visual Augmentation Method forSensing-Web . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 690
Yuichi Ohta, Yoshinari Kameda, Itaru Kitahara,Masayuki Hayashi, and Shinya Yamazaki
Manufacturing and Scheduling
Manufacturing Virtual Sensors at Caterpillar, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 700Timothy J. Felty, James R. Mason, and Anthony J. Grichnik
Modelling Low-Carbon UK Energy System Design through 2050 in aCollaboration of Industry and the Public Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 709
Christopher Heaton and Rod Davies
A Remark on Adaptive Scheduling of Optimization Algorithms . . . . . . . . 719Krisztian Balazs and Laszlo T. Koczy
An Adaptive Fuzzy Model Predictive Control System for the TextileFiber Industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 729
Stefan Berlik and Maryam Nasiri
Methodology for Evaluation of Linked Multidimensional MeasurementSystem with Balanced Scorecard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 737
Yutaka Kigawa, Kiyoshi Nagata, Fuyume Sai, and Michio Amagasa
Predictive Probabilistic and Possibilistic Models Used for RiskAssessment of SLAs in Grid Computing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 747
Christer Carlsson and Robert Fuller
Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 759
Table of Contents – Part I
Reasoning with Uncertainty
Decomposable Models
An Algorithm to Find a Perfect Map for Graphoid Structures . . . . . . . . . 1Marco Baioletti, Giuseppe Busanello, and Barbara Vantaggi
An Empirical Study of the Use of the Noisy-Or Model in a Real-LifeBayesian Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Janneke H. Bolt and Linda C. van der Gaag
Possibilistic Graphical Models and Compositional Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Jirina Vejnarova
Bayesian Networks vs. Evidential Networks: An Application to ConvoyDetection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Evangeline Pollard, Michele Rombaut, and Benjamin Pannetier
Approximation of Data by Decomposable Belief Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40Radim Jirousek
Imprecise Probabilities
A Gambler’s Gain Prospects with Coherent Imprecise Previsions . . . . . . . 50Paolo Vicig
Infinite Exchangeability for Sets of Desirable Gambles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60Gert de Cooman and Erik Quaeghebeur
Ergodicity Conditions for Upper Transition Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70Filip Hermans and Gert de Cooman
An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian and Credal Set Theory forDiscrete State Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Alexander Karlsson, Ronnie Johansson, and Sten F. Andler
On the Complexity of Non-reversible Betting Games on Many-ValuedEvents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Martina Fedel and Tommaso Flaminio
XX Table of Contents – Part I
Sequential Decision Processes under Act-State Independence withArbitrary Choice Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Matthias C.M. Troffaes, Nathan Huntley, and Ricardo Shirota Filho
Logics for Reasoning
Similarity-Based Equality with Lazy Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108Gines Moreno
Progressive Reasoning for Complex Dialogues among Agents . . . . . . . . . . 118Josep Puyol-Gruart and Mariela Morveli-Espinoza
Measuring Instability in Normal Residuated Logic Programs: DiscardingInformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Nicolas Madrid and Manuel Ojeda-Aciego
Implementing Prioritized Merging with ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138Julien Hue, Odile Papini, and Eric Wurbel
Preference Modeling
An Interactive Algorithm to Deal with Inconsistencies in theRepresentation of Cardinal Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
Brice Mayag, Michel Grabisch, and Christophe Labreuche
Characterization of Complete Fuzzy Preorders Defined by Archimedeant-Norms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
Ignacio Montes, Davide Martinetti, Susana Dıaz, and Susana Montes
Rectification of Preferences in a Fuzzy Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168Camilo Franco de los Rıos, Javier Montero, andJ. Tinguaro Rodrıguez
Data Analysis and Knowledge Processing
Belief Functions
Identification of Speakers by Name Using Belief Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179Simon Petitrenaud, Vincent Jousse, Sylvain Meignier, andYannick Esteve
Constructing Multiple Frames of Discernment for MultipleSubproblems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
Johan Schubert
Conflict Interpretation in a Belief Interval Based Framework . . . . . . . . . . . 199Clement Solau, Anne-Marie Jolly, Laurent Delahoche,Bruno Marhic, and David Menga
Table of Contents – Part I XXI
Evidential Data Association Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209Ahmed Dallil, Mourad Oussalah, and Abdelaziz Ouldali
Maintaining Evidential Frequent Itemsets in Case of Data Deletion . . . . . 218Mohamed Anis Bach Tobji and Boutheina Ben Yaghlane
TS-Models from Evidential Clustering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228Rui Jorge Almeida and Uzay Kaymak
Measuring Impact of Diversity of Classifiers on the Accuracy ofEvidential Ensemble Classifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
Yaxin Bi and Shengli Wu
Multiplication of Multinomial Subjective Opinions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248Audun Jøsang and Stephen O’Hara
Evaluation of Information Reported: A Model in the Theory ofEvidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258
Laurence Cholvy
Rough Sets
Gradual Evaluation of Granules of a Fuzzy Relation: R-related Sets . . . . 268Slavka Bodjanova and Martin Kalina
Combined Bayesian Networks and Rough-Granular Approaches forDiscovery of Process Models Based on Vehicular Traffic Simulation . . . . . 278
Mateusz Adamczyk, Pawe�l Betlinski, and Pawe�l Gora
On Scalability of Rough Set Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288Piotr Kwiatkowski, Sinh Hoa Nguyen, and Hung Son Nguyen
Machine Learning
Interestingness Measures for Association Rules within Groups . . . . . . . . . 298Aıda Jimenez, Fernando Berzal, and Juan-Carlos Cubero
Data Mining in RL-Bags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308M. Dolores Ruiz, Miguel Delgado, and Daniel Sanchez
Feature Subset Selection for Fuzzy Classification Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318Marcos E. Cintra and Heloisa A. Camargo
Restricting the IDM for Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328Giorgio Corani and Alessio Benavoli
XXII Table of Contents – Part I
Probabilistic Methods
Estimation of Possibility-Probability Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338Balapuwaduge Sumudu Udaya Mendis and Tom D. Gedeon
Bayesian Assaying of GUHA Nuggets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348Robert Piche and Esko Turunen
Rank Correlation Coefficient Correction by Removing Worst Cases . . . . . 356Martin Krone and Frank Klawonn
Probabilistic Relational Learning for Medical Diagnosis Based on IonMobility Spectrometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
Marc Finthammer, Christoph Beierle, Jens Fisseler,Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Bulent Moller, and Jorg I. Baumbach
Automated Gaussian Smoothing and Peak Detection Based onRepeated Averaging and Properties of a Spectrum’s Curvature . . . . . . . . 376
Hyung-Won Koh and Lars Hildebrand
Uncertainty Interval Expression of Measurement: Possibility MaximumSpecificity versus Probability Maximum Entropy Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . 386
Gilles Mauris
Fuzzy Methods
Lazy Induction of Descriptions Using Two Fuzzy Versions of the RandIndex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396
Eva Armengol and Angel Garcıa-Cerdana
Fuzzy Clustering-Based Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 406Luiz F.S. Coletta, Eduardo R. Hruschka, Thiago F. Covoes, andRicardo J.G.B. Campello
Fuzzy Classification of Nonconvex Data-Inherent Structures . . . . . . . . . . . 416Arne-Jens Hempel and Steffen F. Bocklisch
Fuzzy-Pattern-Classifier Training with Small Data Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426Uwe Monks, Denis Petker, and Volker Lohweg
Temporal Linguistic Summaries of Time Series Using Fuzzy Logic . . . . . . 436Janusz Kacprzyk and Anna Wilbik
A Comparison of Five Fuzzy Rand Indices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446Derek T. Anderson, James C. Bezdek, James M. Keller, andMihail Popescu
Identifying the Risk of Attribute Disclosure by Mining Fuzzy Rules . . . . . 455Irene Dıaz, Jose Ranilla, Luis J. Rodrıguez-Muniz, and Luigi Troiano
Table of Contents – Part I XXIII
Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Fuzzy Measures and Integrals
Explicit Descriptions of Associative Sugeno Integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465Miguel Couceiro and Jean-Luc Marichal
Continuity of Choquet Integrals of Supermodular Capacities . . . . . . . . . . . 471Nobusumi Sagara
Inclusion-Exclusion Integral and Its Application to Subjective VideoQuality Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480
Aoi Honda and Jun Okamoto
Fuzzy Measure Spaces Generated by Fuzzy Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490Antonın Dvorak and Michal Holcapek
Absolute Continuity of Monotone Measure and Convergence inMeasure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
Jun Li, Radko Mesiar, and Qiang Zhang
An Axiomatic Approach to Fuzzy Measures Like Set Cardinality forFinite Fuzzy Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505
Michal Holcapek
Choquet-integral-Based Evaluations by Fuzzy Rules: Methods forDeveloping Fuzzy Rule Tables on the Basis of Weights and InteractionDegrees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515
Eiichiro Takahagi
Fuzzy Inference
On a New Class of Implications in Fuzzy Logic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525Yun Shi, Bart Van Gasse, Da Ruan, and Etienne Kerre
Diagrams of Fuzzy Orderings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535Branimir Seselja and Andreja Tepavcevic
Fuzzy Relation Equations in Semilinear Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 545Irina Perfilieva
Adaptive Rule Based-Reasoning by Qualitative Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553Marius Mircea Balas and Valentina Emilia Balas
Fuzzy Regions: Adding Subregions and the Impact on Surface andDistance Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 561
Jorg Verstraete
XXIV Table of Contents – Part I
On Liu’s Inference Rules for Fuzzy Inference Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571Xin Gao, Dan A. Ralescu, and Yuan Gao
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
A New Approach to the Distances between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets . . . . 581Krassimir Atanassov
Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Contractive Fuzzy Negations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 591Benjamin Bedregal, Humberto Bustince, Javier Fernandez,Glad Deschrijver, and Radko Mesiar
Trust Propagation Based on Group Opinion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601Anna Stachowiak
Application of IF-Sets to Modeling of Lip Shapes Similarities . . . . . . . . . . 611Krzysztof Dyczkowski
A Random Set and Prototype Theory Interpretation of IntuitionisticFuzzy Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 618
Jonathan Lawry
Hesitation Degrees as the Size of Ignorance Combined with Fuzziness . . . 629Maciej Wygralak
On the Distributivity of Implication Operations over t-Representablet-Norms Generated from Strict t-Norms in Interval-Valued Fuzzy SetsTheory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 637
Micha�l Baczynski
Properties of Interval-Valued Fuzzy Relations, Atanassov’s Operatorsand Decomposable Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 647
Barbara Pekala
Cardinality and Entropy for Bifuzzy Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 656Vasile Patrascu
Aggregation Functions
Some Remarks on the Solutions to the Functional EquationI(x, y) = I(x, I(x, y)) for D-Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 666
Sebastia Massanet and Joan Torrens
On an Open Problem of U. Hohle - A Characterization of ConditionallyCancellative T-Subnorms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 676
Balasubramaniam Jayaram
Table of Contents – Part I XXV
Triangular Norms and Conorms on the Set of Discrete FuzzyNumbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683
Jaume Casasnovas and J. Vicente Riera
Arity-Monotonic Extended Aggregation Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 693Marek G ↪agolewski and Przemys�law Grzegorzewski
Some Properties of Multi–argument Distances and FermatMultidistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 703
Javier Martın and Gaspar Mayor
Mixture Utility in General Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 712Jana Spirkova
Evolutionary Agorithms
Application of Evolutionary Algorithms to the Optimization of theFlame Position in Coal-Fired Utility Steam Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 722
W. Kastner, R. Hampel, T. Forster, M. Freund, M. Wagenknecht,D. Haake, H. Kanisch, U.-S. Altmann, and F. Muller
Measurement of Ground-Neutral Currents in Three Phase TransformersUsing a Genetically Evolved Shaping Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 731
Luciano Sanchez and Ines Couso
A Genetic Algorithm for Feature Selection and Granularity Learningin Fuzzy Rule-Based Classification Systems for Highly ImbalancedData-Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 741
Pedro Villar, Alberto Fernandez, and Francisco Herrera
Learning of Fuzzy Rule-Based Meta-schedulers for Grid Computingwith Differential Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 751
R.P. Prado, S. Garcıa-Galan, J.E. Munoz Exposito,A.J. Yuste, and S. Bruque
Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761