combined phase i desk study and phase ii … floor slab should ... cast in situ floor slab...

COMBINED PHASE I DESK STUDY AND PHASE II GROUND INVESTIGATION

Station Road Padiham

REL00396/V1.0

REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report

i

REPORT DETAILS

Reference Report Type Author / Approved Issue Date

REL00396 Phase I & II Report GJS / RS 13‐12‐12

REVISIONS

Revision Details of Revision Initials Date

V1.0 First Issue SL 13‐12‐12


ii

Contents Executive Summary 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION & HISTORY 33.0 GEOLOGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 6 4.0 EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION 12 5.0 6.0

GAS MONITORING LABORATORY TESTING & CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT

16 23

7.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 328.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 37 Appendices

I Site Location Plan II Annotated Site Plan III Site Plan Showing General Site Views IV Exploratory Hole Location Plan & Depth of Made Ground V Exploratory Hole Logs VI Laboratory Soil Test Results VII Historical Plans VIII Landmark Envirocheck Report IX Coal Authority Mining Report X Gas Monitoring Results XI Statistical Assessments XII Plates XIII Conditions and Limitations

REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ground Conditions Made Ground was encountered across the site to depths ranging between 0.75m to in excess

of 4.65m (TP8). The Made Ground included anthropogenic materials (such as brick, slag, ash etc.) presumably derived from historical uses of the site. Underlying the Made Ground, variable natural strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) ranging from a soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand, was encountered to a maximum proven depth of 7.00m begl.

Foundation Design However, the material currently logged as ‘Possible Reworked Natural Strata’ is typically variable and locally poor in strength and is generally considered to be unsuitable for traditional spread foundations. Therefore, foundation solutions, such as piles or ground improvement (e.g. vibro stone columns or dynamic compaction techniques) are likely to be required for the proposed low rise residential and commercial developments. The advice of suitably competent piling and ground improvement contractors should be sought to determine the feasibility of this option. Further deep boreholes are recommended to prove the depth of competent bedrock and assist with foundation design.

Floor Slabs Commercial Buildings Ground bearing floor slabs will be appropriate for lightly loaded floor slabs where a limited depth of geotechnically competent ground is present (subject to Structural Engineer design taking account of loading characteristics and tolerable settlement). Improvement of the ground by proof rolling of the formation and the inclusion of geotextile reinforcement in capping materials is recommended if ground bearing floor slabs are to be considered. Alternatively, ground floors may be designed as suspended. Residential Dwellings Made Ground has been encountered in excess of 0.60m across the site and therefore a suspended floor slab should be adopted. Suspended floors may be either reinforced concrete cast in‐situ or a pre‐cast concrete suspended floor with a clear ventilated void (i.e. beam and block), although if gas precautions in accordance with NHBC ‘Amber 1’ classification are proposed a beam and block floor will be required. Beam and block floors with a clear void and heave precautions will be required if deepening due to trees in excess of 1.50m depth.

Radon No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensions.

Gas Precautions Residential Priorities with a Suspended Ground Floor (NHBC Classification) In accordance with Table 14.1 of NHBC Guidance the site may be classified as ‘Amber 1’ where the following gas precautions are required assuming that residential properties will have a suspended floor slab (e.g. beam and block): • Provision of a minimum 2000g DPM membrane with all joints and penetrations sealed. • Ventilated sub‐floor void (minimum one complete volume change per 24 hours). • Gas protection measures should be installed as prescribed in BRE Report 414. Consideration may be given to the design of gas precautions in accordance with CIRIA C665 and BS8485: 2007 should alternative foundation / floor slab proposals be considered in residential properties. Commercial Properties (CIRIA C665) In accordance with CIRIA C665, the site may be may be classified as ‘CS2’ for commercial properties as follows: • Reinforced concrete cast in situ floor slab (suspended, non suspended or raft) with at least

1200g DPM.


iv

• Or alternately, beam and block or pre cast concrete slab and minimum 2000g DPM/reinforced gas membrane.

Building Near Trees Foundations designs will require adjusting when building near existing, recently removed or proposed trees due to the presence of shallow cohesive soils with a medium volume change potential.

Coal Mining No coal mining related investigations or precautions are considered necessary at the site. Water Excavations may locally require dewatering due to the presence of shallow perched

groundwater. Excavations Excavations may require trench support. The requirement for trench support should be

assessed by the groundworks contractor prior to commencing site works. Sulphate Classification Design Sulfate Class DS‐1 and an Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC)

classification of AC‐1. CBRs and Pavements Typical CBR values of less than 2% could be initially anticipated at the site, subject to

confirmation by in‐situ testing. Soakaways The use of soakaway drainage is unlikely to be feasible due to the depth of the Made Ground,

the low permeability clayey soils which underlie the site at shallow depth and the presence of localised very shallow groundwater.

Contamination Assessment The results of the chemical testing undertaken at the site indicate that the individual and UCL concentrations of Arsenic and a number of PAHs in the shallow Made Ground are in excess of their respective Tier 1 SACs and may represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use. The concentrations detected are not considered likely to represent a significant risk to areas of commercial development at the site.

Remediation Proposals Remediation measures are required where residential development (private dwellings and the sheltered accommodation) is proposed at the site as follows: • A capping layer may be imported to site and placed in private gardens (0.60m thickness)

and soft landscaped areas (0.30m thickness) allowing the Made Ground to remain in‐situ where development levels permit.

• Alternatively, the Made Ground may be excavated from gardens and soft landscaped areas

and either removed off site to a licensed waste management facility or reused beneath areas of proposed hard standing.

Further works should be undertaken to establish if the former underground fuel tanks in the west of the site are still present. Validation works should be undertaken in the soils underlying the tanks to confirm if hydrocarbon impaction is present. If hydrocarbon impaction is present remedial works may be required.

Off‐site Disposal The laboratory test results from this investigation should be supplied to landfill operators to determine likely disposal costs where necessary. WAC testing may be required to accurately determine the cost of disposal of soils.

Unforeseen Circumstances Should any areas of potentially contaminated soil be encountered during site construction works, we would recommend consultation with Jackson Purdue Lever to ensure that our recommendations continue to apply.

Construction Workers It is recommended that construction personnel involved with direct contact with the soils at the site use appropriate PPE equipment together with welfare facilities in accordance with general health and safety guidelines.

Utilities We would recommend that this report is supplied to utility companies (including water supply), and that their recommendations relating to appropriate supply pipes are adhered to.

Licenses, Permits, Registrations & Approvals

The Contractor/Developer is responsible for, and must ensure that, all necessary licenses, permits, plans, registrations and approvals are in place prior to commencing with the works at the site.

Statutory Consultation In accordance with normal planning requirements, we would recommend that a copy of our report is issued by the Client to the Local Authority (and NHBC, if necessary) for review/comment and approval prior to commencing with the redevelopment of the site.

Further Works • Further deep shell & auger boreholes to assist in foundation design. • Establish whether underground fuel tanks are still present in the west of the site.

Subsequently, remove tanks (where present), validate underlying soils and remediate as necessary.

• Engineer assessment of retaining walls.


1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction

Jackson Purdue Lever has been instructed by the Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd to undertake a Combined Phase I Desk Study and Phase II Ground Investigation on the site of Station Road, Padiham.

1.2 Scope of Works The scope of the Desk Study works included the following: • A site walkover. • Review of the sites radon status. • Review of the sites coal mining status. • Review of the sites geology (including hydrology and hydrogeology). • Review of the Landmark Envirocheck Historical Mapping and Environmental Reports relating

to the site.

The scope of the Exploratory Investigation works comprised: • A sub‐contracted service scan of proposed exploratory hole locations. • An exploratory programme of trial pits across the site. • An exploratory programme of window sample boreholes across the site. • A programme of gas monitoring. • Geotechnical and environmental soil testing.

1.3 Project Understanding

We understand that the site will be redeveloped for a mixed end use (all low rise) including residential dwellings, sheltered accommodation and employment units. This understanding has formed the basis of our assessment. Should our understanding prove to be incorrect, it would be necessary to review our comments to ensure that they continue to apply.

1.4 Limitations

The conclusions and recommendations made in this report are limited to those that can be made based on the findings of the investigation. Where comments are made based on information obtained from third parties, Jackson Purdue Lever assumes that all third party information is true and correct. No independent action has been undertaken to validate the findings of third party information, unless specifically stated. This report has been prepared in accordance with our understanding of current best practice. However, new information or legislation, or changes to best practice may necessitate revision of the report after the date of its issue.


2

Jackson Purdue Lever has prepared this report for the sole use and reliance of the Client, Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd, in accordance with our standard Conditions and Limitations (a copy of which is included as Appendix XIII). This report may not be used or relied upon by any third party without the explicit written agreement of Jackson Purdue Lever.

1.5 Confidentiality

The risk assessment undertaken herein remains the intellectual property and trade secret of Jackson Purdue Lever. The information contained within this report must not be disclosed or divulged to any commercial Consultant or other third party without the prior written agreement of Jackson Purdue Lever.


3

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION & HISTORY 2.1 Site Description

The site comprises an irregularly shaped plot of land located off Station Road, Padiham. The site may be located centred around approximate Ordnance Survey National Grid Reference 379300E 433600N. The site extends to an approximate area of 2.26 Hectares. At the time of our walkover, the site comprised a vacant parcel of land which was predominantly surfaced with gravel and sporadic grasses / shrubs. An estimated 5‐6m bank vegetated with grass shrubs and trees were located in the south of the site. A stockpile of brick and concrete fragments was located in the southeast corner of the site. The site is sensibly level with the exception of the far eastern area which slopes slightly to moderately downwards the east to a retaining wall (varying from approximately 1m to 4m high). A previous ground investigation report for the site (see Section 3.10) indicates underground fuel tanks were present to the west of the former works building (location not identified). Above ground fuel tanks are also indicated to have been present at the site (location not identified). A pathway (formerly a railway line) is located adjacent to the north of the site. This pathway is generally level with the site with the exception of a section located in the middle of the northern boundary which slopes steeply downwards to the north. Beyond the railway line, to the north, a significant embankment (anticipated to be associated with the former railway line) was observed sloping downwards to the north towards residential housing in the east and a leisure centre in the west. Bridges (formerly from the railway) are located in the west and northeast of the site respectively. Station Road is located to the east of the site, beyond which lies commercial premises. Trees, generally of immature age, are located sporadically across the site. Residential housing is located to the southeast of the site. A school is located to the south of the site and commercial premises are located to the sites southwest. A retaining wall, estimated to be approximately 5m‐6m high, is situated adjacent to the southwest of the site. Open ground and the River Calder is located 40m to the west of the site. A Site Location Plan is included in Appendix I (Figure No. REL00396/01). An Annotated Site Plan is included in Appendix II (Figure No. REL00396/02) and a Plan Showing General Site Views is included in Appendix III (Figure No. REL00396/03).

2.2 Site History Historical and contemporary Ordnance Survey publications dating from 1848 to 2012 were reviewed to obtain relevant historical information for the site. Historical plans are included as Appendix VII. We would note that the boundary marked on the historical sheets within the Envirocheck Report appears to ‘shift’ on several of the maps due to scaling inaccuracies between maps of differing dates. This is a function of Envirocheck transposition algorithms.


4

TABLE 1 – HISTORICAL PUBLICATION DATA

Date Features on Site Features off Site 1848 • The site is indicated to comprises open fields. • The site is generally surrounded by open fields.

• Green Lane is located to the southeast of the site.

• The River Calder is located 40m to the west of the site.

• The Green Brook is indicated 50m east of the site.

1891 • A part of a platform and waiting rooms, associated with Padiham Railway Station, are indicated at the northern boundary of the site.

• Railway sidings are shown across the site. • A goods shed is shown in the centre if the site. • A travelling crane is shown in the centre of the

site. • A platform is shown in the northeast of the

site. • An embankment, sloping downwards to the

north, is shown in the south of the site. • An embankment, sloping downwards to the

south, encroaches over the southern boundary in the west of the site.

• Small buildings are shown sporadically across the site.

• Padiham Railway Station, including platforms, waiting rooms and a glass roofed structures. Railway line is indicated adjacent to the north of the site. Bridges are indicated at the end of the site to the east and west.

• An embankment is shown to the north of the railway line sloping downwards to the north.

• Station Road is indicated adjacent to the east. • Mills, bobin works, a saw mill and a timber

yard are indicated to the east of the site. • A school is indicated adjacent to the south of

the site. • Regrading works are indicated 5m south of the

site. • Residential housing is shown 10m south of the

site. • Regrading works associated with a gas works

are indicated from 20m south of the site. • A church is indicated 40m south of the site. • A gasometer is indicated 110m south of the

site. 1912 • The layout of the railway sidings has been

revised at the site. • The regrading works associated with the gas

works is no longer shown. Buildings are shown on the site of the gas works. The gas works is indicated to be adjacent to the south of the site.

• A refuse destructor is shown 160m southwest of the site.

• A skating rink is shown 50m north of the site. 1931 • A tramway appears to link the site and the gas

works to the south. • An additional gasometer, further buildings,

tanks and a chimney are shown at the gas works to the south.

• A bowling green and tennis ground are located from 60m north of the site.

• Allotment gardens are indicated 100m south of the site.

• A mortuary is shown 150m southwest. 1958 • The layout of the small buildings and platform

in the northeast of the site has been revised. • A subway is shown to encroach slightly over

the central part of the sites northern boundary.

• The surrounding land appears essentially unchanged.

1968 • Padiham Station is no longer indicated. The station building and platform appear to have been partially removed.

• The site is labelled as ‘Coal Sidings’.

• A building formally located in the centre of the gas works is no longer shown.

• A conveyor is shown in the centre of the site. • A ‘Public Baths’ is shown 50m north of the site.

1978 • The railway sidings are no longer shown. • A ‘Mineral Railway’ is indicated adjacent to the


5

TABLE 1 – HISTORICAL PUBLICATION DATA

Date Features on Site Features off Site • The site has been redeveloped with a large

‘works’. • Buildings are shown in the south of the site. • Car parking is shown in the south o the site • A tank is indicated in the north of the site. • The embankment is no longer shown in the

west of the site.

north of the site.

1990 • An additional building is shown in the centre of the site.

•

• A commercial building is indicated 10m south of the site on the gas works.

1993‐1994

• The site appears essentially unchanged. • The school to the south of the site is no longer shown.

• The gas works is generally no longer shown although several buildings remain.

• A ‘Household Waste Disposal Centre’ is shown 90m south of the site.

• A breakers yard is indicated 50m south of the site.

2006 • The site appears essentially unchanged. • The railway is indicated to be dismantled. • A school us shown 30mcsouth of the site.

2012 • The site is shown as a vacant parcel of land. • The surrounding land appears essentially unchanged.

The earliest mapping of 1848 indicates the topography of the site prior to regrading works undertaken during the construction of Padiham Railway Station. The map indicates that originally the site sloped downwards from the southern tip of the site (indicated to be close to the top of a hill) towards the River Calder which bends around the site to the west / north and Green Brook to the east. The western tip and the northeast of the site were indicated to be at approximately level of the river plain. The later 1:2500 scale mapping indicates that the site is approximately 8m AOD (taken from the bridge adjacent to the site) and the land surrounding the site to the north and south of its western tip is approximately 76m AOD, potentially indicating that significant depths of Made Ground may be present in this area of the site. Site levels also indicate that similar depths of Made Ground may also be present in the northeast of the site.


6

3.0 GEOLOGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.1 References

The following geological publications were referred to: • British Geological Society (BGS) 1:50,000 Series Sheet 125, ‘Clitheroe’ (1960), Solid and Drift

Edition. • BGS 1:10,560 Series, Sheet SD 73 SE (1963), Solid and Drift Edition. • BGS ‘Geology of the Country around Clitheroe and Nelson’ (1961). • The Coal Authority and The Law Society publication ‘Coal Mining and Brine Subsidence Claim

Searches ‐ Directory and Guidance’, Sixth Edition (2006).

3.2 Geology The northern area of the site is indicated to be underlain by Alluvium, dating from the Recent and Pleistocene Period. Alluvium is typically encountered as a soft to firm unconsolidated, compressible silty clay, with layers of silt, sand, peat and basal gravel. The remaining area of the site to the south is indicated to be underlain by Boulder Clay (now Classified as Glacial Till), dating from the Recent and Pleistocene Period. The memoir indicates that the ‘Boulder Clay consist of rounded and subangular scratched stones enclosed in a matrix which varies from impermeable stiff grey brown or occasionally reddish clay to porous brown, ochreous or occasional reddish clayey gravel. In nearly every section of stiff boulder clay there abound smoothed, scratched boulders of limestone as well as angular fragments of dark chert. In the more sandy types of boulder clay the dominant boulders are of sandstone and gritstone with, in addition, fragments of dark chert and often small pieces of ironstone, shale and coal’. Underlying the above superficial deposits, undifferentiated Permian Lower Coal Measures is indicated, dating from the Carboniferous Period. Glacial Till is typically encountered as a grey mudstone, siltstone and pale grey interbedded with sandstone. Coal seams are common in upper part and mudstones with marine fossils (marine bands) are present in lower part. Immediately to the west, and underlying the Boulder Clay, Dandy Rock is indicated dating from the Carboniferous Period and part of the Lower Coal Measures. No description of the Dandy rock was available in the BGS memoir or the BGS on line database. However, the Dandy Rock is understood to comprise Sandstone from the Lower Coal Measures series.

3.3 Faults

A fault is indicated immediately to the west of the site, oriented in the northwest / southeast direction and downthrown to the northeast (marking the boundary of the Permian Lower Coal Measures and the Dandy Rock).

3.4 Made Ground No Made Ground is indicated on the site. However, Made Ground is indicated immediately to the north of the site and described as ‘mainly road, railway embankments, quarry spoil and industrial areas’.


7

3.5 Hydrogeology Groundwater Vulnerability The Superficial & Bedrock Aquifer designation for the site is indicated to be ‘Secondary A’. This is described by the Environment Agency as ‘permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers’. Source Protection Zones The Landmark Envirocheck Report does not identify any Source Protection Zones (SPZs) on or within 250m of the site.

3.6 Hydrology

Flood Risk The Landmark Envirocheck Report does not identify the site to be located within an area of flooding or extreme flooding from rivers or sea without defences. Areas of flooding and extreme flooding from rivers or sea without defences are located from 13m and 7m distance of the site respectively. However, the site is noted to be significantly elevated in relation to the River Calder to the west. Surface Water Features The River Calder is indicated 44m to the west of the site and the Green Brook is indicated 50m east of the site.

3.7 Coal Mining The site lies within an area requiring the commission of a Coal Mining Report in accordance with The Coal Authority and The Law Society publication ‘Coal Mining and Brine Subsidence Claim Searches – Directory and Guidance’, Sixth Edition (2006). A Coal Mining Report has therefore been obtained. A copy of the report is included as Appendix IX. The report makes the following salient comments: • The property is in the likely zone of influence from workings in 1 seam of coal at 100m to

110m depth, and last worked in 1887. Any ground movement from these coal workings should have stopped by now.

• The property is not in the likely zone of influence of any present underground coal workings. • There are no known coal mine entries within, or within 20 metres of, the boundary of the • property. • The property is not within the boundary of an opencast site from which coal has been

removed by opencast methods. Based on the findings of the Coal Mining Report no specific investigation or mitigation measures in relation to coal mining issues are considered necessary for the proposed development.


8

3.8 Radon The Landmark Envirocheck Report notes that ‘The property is not in a radon affected area, as less than 1% of homes are above the action level’. The report concludes that ‘No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensions’.

3.9 Landmark Envirocheck Report

A Landmark Envirocheck Report has been commissioned for the site. A full copy of the report is included as Appendix VIII. The key issues identified by the Landmark Envirocheck Report are summarised below. Agency & Hydrological Sixteen Discharge Consents generally pertaining to the release of ‘Public Sewage: Storm Sewage Overflow’ to a stream/river are indicated from 89m distance of the site. A single Local Authority Pollution Prevention & Controls entry is recorded at the site. This pertains to EJ Riley Ltd (the former occupier of the site) and is associated with wood coating (permit date 1996 now revoked). Two further Local Authority Pollution Prevention & Controls entries are located within 92m of the site pertaining mobile screening and crushing processes 92m southwest. A single Pollution Incident to Controlled Waters entry is recorded at the site. This pertains to the release of oil to the River Calder (Category 2 Significant Incident) in 1991. The ‘Property Type’ and the ‘Location’ of the incident are not supplied. However, the position of the spillage is indicated where underground fuel storage tanks are understood to have been located. Twenty eight further Pollution Incident to Controlled Waters entries are located within 250m of the site from a minimum distance of 40m northeast. A Prosecution Relating to Authorised Processes (failure to store and control waste) is located 172m north of the site and Prosecution Relating to A Prosecution Relating to Controlled Waters Processes (allowing harmful waste to enter a watercourse) The River Quality of the Green Brook (entry indicated on site although River actually situated approximately 50m east) is indicated by the Environment agency to be GQA Grade B (good). The River Quality of the River Calder (entry indicated 15m west of site although River actually situated approximately 40m west) is indicated by the Environment agency to be GQA Grade D (fair). A Substantiated Pollution Incident Register entry is indicated 210m southeast of the site associated with the release of crude swage in 2004. Two surface water abstractions are located approximately 460m southeast of the site for use in a manufacturing process as cooling water. A groundwater abstraction is indicated 480m southeast of the site detailed as ‘other industrial / commercial / public services: general use (medium loss)’. Two registered Waste Transfer sites (one superseded and one operational) are indicated 137m southwest of the site. A Registered Waste Treatment Site (operational) is recorded 99m southwest of the site.


9

No other Agency & Hydrological issues that have not been addressed previously have been identified. Waste

Three Historical Landfills are located within 250m radius of the boundary of the site. These entries pertain to Padiham Power Station 97m southwest (deposited waste included inert, indusial and household waste), a British Gas Holder Station 97m southwest (deposited waste included inert waste) and Elizabeth Street 178m southwest (deposited waste included unknown material). Four Licensed Management Facilities (Locations) are indicated from 47m east of the site and identified as a ‘waste transfer station’, ‘vehicle depollution facility’, ‘vehicle dismantlers’ and ‘household waste amenity site’. A registered Landfill Site (permit dated 1987 now lapsed) is recorded 137m southwest of the site associated with the British Gas Holder Station (also listed as the Historical Landfill 97m southwest of the site). The site is indicated to have accepted cement, ceramics, glass, non hazardous metals, slate, concrete, brick, soils, rock, clay, natural sand, solid fully‐polymerised plastics and timber. Hazardous Substances No hazardous substance issues are identified on or within 250m of the site. Geological The Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards is identified as Moderate. There are no other geological issues identified in the Envirocheck Report that are considered likely to have a potential significant adverse effect on the site. Industrial Land Use

Twenty nine Contemporary Trade Directory entries are identified within 250m of the site from a

minimum distance of 31m west.

Sensitive Land Uses

There are no Sensitive Land Use issues identified in the Envirocheck Report that are considered likely to have a potential significant adverse effect on the site.

3.10 Previous Site Investigation Works

Thomas Consulting previously produced a ‘Phase I Contaminated Land Desk Study’ dated 14th February 2007, including a review of initial boreholes advanced by Mini Soils Surveys in 2006. The Desk Study confirmed the following: • ‘The site is currently a disused warehouse with associated hardstanding’. • ‘Geology confirmed as Made Ground underlain by sandy clay’. • ‘Site was formerly railway sidings with goods shed, then developed into a works most recently

occupied by snooker table manufacturer’.


10

• Underground fuel tanks are indicated to have been present to the west of the former works building (location not identified). Above ground fuel tanks are also indicated to have been present at the site (location not identified).

• The reports indicate ‘chemical analysis identified elevated concentrations of PAH and TPH’. The report includes a table which summarises the most significant contaminant analysis results’. These concentrations of TPH in the table ranged between 750mg/kg (diesel range and 13,000mg/kg (mineral range). The analysis also indicated that ‘the inorganic contaminants were present in concentrations below their published soil guideline values’.

• Made Ground was encountered up to depths of 3.50m begl in BH1 in the west of the site. Suspected Made Ground was encountered up to 3.80m begl in the northwest of the site. Made Ground was encountered to depths less than 2.00m begl in the boreholes advanced in the remaining area of the site.

3.11 Land Use Assessment

As part of the land use assessment, reference has been made to the ‘Desk Reference Guide to potentially Contaminative Land Uses’ produced by Mr P Syms and published jointly by the ISVA (The Professional Society for Valuers and Auctioneers) in association with The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH). We have also made reference to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency Contaminated Land Report CLR8 ‘Potential Contaminants for the Assessment of Land’ (March 2002). This document identifies key contaminants which may potentially be present at a site as a result of a given historical land use and whilst formally withdrawn is considered to represent a useful reference document.

3.11.1 On Site Assessment The Phase I Desk Study searches indicate that the site comprised open fields until its development as a Padiham Railway Station in the late 1800s. The Station included, sidings, goods sheds, tramway, waiting rooms and platforms. Embankments are shown in the west (no longer present) and the south of the site. The land use continued until the late 1970s when the site was developed as a works. Uses of this building included the manufacture of snooker tables and cues. Underground fuel storage tanks are indicated in the west of the site. Above ground fuel tanks are also indicated to have been located elsewhere although there exact location is unclear. The works has been demolished and the site was observed to generally comprise a vacant parcel of land with no above ground structures visible during the site walkover. Based on published guidance, the age of the historical uses and our experience of similar sites the following key contaminants of concern may be present at the site: • Metals and metalloids associated with any Made Ground. • Natural Metal Enrichment (NME) in Natural Strata. • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in any Made Ground. • Hydrocarbons associated with the historical use and storage of fuel/oil at the site. • Acid/Sulphate contaminated soils.


11

3.11.2 Off Site Assessment The Phase I Desk Study indicates that the area to the north of the site comprised Padiham Railway Station and associated railway line. A former railway embankment is indicated to the sites north. A former gas works is indicated adjacent to the south of the site. Three landfills are identified from within a 250m radius of the site (arbitrary theoretical influencing distance). Therefore, potential off site sources of contamination may include migration or importation of contamination from the adjacent gas works or the migration of ground gas from the areas of Made Ground and landfills located within 250m of the site.


12

4.0 EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION 4.1 Introduction

Sub‐Surface Utility Avoidance Scan Prior to the commencement of our intrusive works at the site a sub‐contracted sub‐surface utility scan of proposed exploratory hole locations was undertaken to attempt to avoid buried services. Based on the results of the service scan, the exploratory holes were positioned in accessible areas of the site in order to maximise the amount of information obtained during our site works, whilst avoiding known utilities. Trial Pits Trial Pits were advanced at the site on 25th and 26th November 2012 to obtain visually representative soil samples for subsequent soils testing. A total of 14No. Trial pits (designated TP1 to TP14) were advanced at the site to depths ranging between 1.00m and 4.65m begl. Window Sample Boreholes Trial Pits were advanced at the site on 26th November 2012 to obtain visually representative soil samples for subsequent soils testing. A total of 8No. Window samples (designated WS1 to WS8) were advanced at the site to depths ranging between 1.00m and 7.00m begl. A plan (Figure No. REL00396/04) indicating the approximate locations of the exploratory holes at the site is included in Appendix IV, exploratory hole logs for the site are included as Appendix V. General views of trial pits and arisings are shown on the Plates included in Appendix XII.

4.2 Ground Conditions

The following section discusses the ground conditions encountered in the exploratory holes at the site.

4.2.1 Made Ground Topsoil Topsoil was encountered in a single exploratory hole (WS4) and comprised dark brown sandy clayey topsoil 0.40m begl.

4.2.2 Made Ground (General)

Made Ground (not including the above Made Ground Topsoil) was encountered in all of the twenty two exploratory holes. The shallow Made Ground contains a significant proportion of anthropogenic materials and thus the identification of this material is relatively straightforward. However, given that the off site ground levels are significantly lower to the west, north and east, greater depths of Made Ground may be present from on site historical site regrading activities.


13

These works may have involved the excavation and decrease in original site levels to the sites south via the excavation of the north side of the hill and the placement of materials in the north, west and possibly east of the site to create the relatively level topography observed during the site walkover. However, ‘re‐engineered materials typically comprising reworked natural strata and can be difficult to differentiate from in situ natural strata. Consequently, the depth of the Made Ground / Reworked Natural Strata indicated on the logs is considered tentative at this stage. Made Ground (Anthropogenic Inclusions) The shallow Made Ground where anthropogenic inclusions were encountered typically comprised a locally cobbly sandy gravel to gravelly clay (gravel includes, slag, ash, brick, sandstone, concrete, ceramics, mudstone, flint, limestone and coal) to depths of between 0.75m and in excess of 4.65m begl. Natural Strata (Possibly Reworked) Due to the regrading works previously undertaken at the site the strata underlying the above Made Ground has been assumed to comprise Possible Reworked Natural Strata based on the information currently available. This strata ranged from a soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay (locally with mudstone and sandstone boulders) to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand (gravel is fine to coarse subangular to subrounded mudstone, sandstone and flint) to a maximum proven depths of 7.00m begl. Furthermore, localised peaty soils were encountered and running sand. Two exploratory holes encountered in the south of the site (WS2 & TP2) were observed to include gravelly strata to a depth of 2.10m in WS2 and in excess of 4.00m in TP2. A silty sandy peat was encountered in WS5 between 6.90m and 7.00m begl (borehole terminated at 7.00m).

4.2.3 Visual & Olfactory Evidence of Hydrocarbon Contamination

Visual and olfactory evidence of significant soil contamination was encountered during the advancement of two of the exploratory holes at the site as follows: • TP1 1.10m to 2.10m – moderate hydrocarbon / tar odour and metallic sheen. • WS2 2.00m to 3.95m – slight to moderate hydrocarbon odour.

4.3 Summary

The findings from the exploratory holes are summarised in Table 2.


14

TABLE 2 – SUMMARY OF EXPLORATORY HOLE FINDINGS

Stratum

Exploratory Holes Encountered

Depth to Base of Stratum (m begl)

Description

TOPSOIL MADE GROUND WS4 0.40 Dark brown sandy clayey topsoil MADE GROUND

(ANTHROPOGENIC INCLUSIONS)

All exploratory holes 0.75‐4.65+ Locally cobbly sandy gravel to gravel clay

NATURAL STRATA (POSSIBLY REWORKED /

DISTURBED)

All exploratory holes TBC Soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay (locally with mudstone and sandstone boulders) to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand.

4.4 Water

Water was encountered during the advancement of nine of the twenty two exploratory holes as a slight seepage at depths ranging between 0.60 and 3.30m begl. The depth of the groundwater, as indicated during the four groundwater monitoring visits, varied between 0.51m and 2.34m begl.

4.5 Stability and Excavations The sides of eight of the exploratory holes were observed to be unstable, particularly when encountering wet granular soils, although frequently only a partial collapse of the pits was encountered.

4.6 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Data

SPT testing was undertaken in the Made Ground and Possible Reworked Natural Strata in seven of the eight boreholes. The SPT values ranged between 4 and 50 (i.e. refusal) indicating highly variable ground conditions prevail at the site. The results also indicate that firm clay was present at depth in boreholes WS5, WS7 and WS8.


15


16

5.0 GROUND GAS & WATER MONITORING 5.1 Introduction

The Phase I Desk Study information has identified several former landfills and Made Ground within potential influencing distance of the site. These features represent a possible source of potentially hazardous ground gases (i.e. Methane and Carbon Dioxide). A total of 5No. window sample boreholes have been installed with combined ground gas and groundwater monitoring wells during previous works (WS2, WS4, WS5, WS7 and WS8). Following the recent installation of monitoring wells, four weekly visits were made to the site to monitor gas levels in the 5No. wells on the site. The findings of all available ground gas monitoring visits have been included in the following assessment.

5.2 Results of the Gas Monitoring

Gas monitoring results are presented in Appendix X and summarised in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3 – SUMMARY OF GAS MONITORING DATA

Parameter Minimum % by volume (v/v) Maximum % by volume (v/v)

Methane 0.0 0.0 Carbon Dioxide 0.0 5.8

Oxygen 12.8 20.8 Flow (l/h) 0.0 0.0

• Measurable levels of Methane were not recorded in the monitoring wells during the monitoring visits.

• Carbon Dioxide was encountered in all boreholes up to a maximum concentration of 5.8% by

volume (v/v).

• Oxygen was encountered at concentrations fluctuating between 12.8% v/v and 20.8% v/v. • Measurable flow rates were not recorded in the boreholes during the monitoring undertaken.

• Groundwater level monitoring has revealed groundwater levels at depths ranging between

0.51m and 2.34m begl.

• Barometric pressure ranged between 971mb and 1000mb during the monitoring visits. 5.3 Appropriate Guidance

The results of the gas monitoring have been reviewed with reference to the following documentation: • CIRIA Report C665 ‘Assessing risks posed by hazardous ground gases to buildings’ (2007).


17

• NHBC & RSK Group publication ‘Guidance on evaluation of development proposals on sites where methane and carbon dioxide are present’ (March 2007).

CIRIA Report C665 recommends a risk‐based methodology to ground gas assessment, which includes the calculation of a site‐specific Gas Screening Value (GSV). The GSV of a particular ground gas regime equates to: GSV (l/hr) = maximum borehole flow rate (l/hr) x maximum gas concentration (expressed as a fraction). The GSV should be used to assess the risks posed by gassing sites for both residential and commercial/industrial developments. CIRIA Report C665 presents a total of six Characteristic Situations (CS) to assist with the relevant ground gas protection measures that should be installed to mitigate the risk posed by ground gases for a residential building and commercial/industrial developments. The CS classifications represent a revised approach to the CS tables detailed within CIRA 149 ‘Protecting development from methane’. The NHBC has developed a system of ‘Traffic Lights’ to characterise gassing sites, which is specific to low‐rise residential developments. Classification of the Traffic Lights provides the relevant ground gas protection measures that should be installed to mitigate the risk posed by ground gases for a low‐rise residential development with a suspended floor slab. The Traffic Light approach is based on ‘Typical Maximum Concentrations’ of Methane and Carbon Dioxide for initial screening purposes. Table 8.5 (below) is reproduced from CIRIA C665 which indicates how a Characteristic Situation is determined.


18

Table 8.6 (below) is also reproduced from CIRIA C665 which details typical protection measures associated with each Characteristic Situation.


19


20

Tables 14.1 and 14.2 from the NHBC guidance are reproduced below.

The GSV should be calculated for both Methane and Carbon Dioxide and the worst case adopted in order to establish the appropriate protection measures for the site. The higher the classification the greater the risk posed by the presence of ground gas. Both the above guidance documents note that ‘…the GSV is a guideline value and not an absolute threshold’.


21

5.4 Ground Gas Analysis

Methane No measurable concentrations of Methane were recorded during the programme of ground gas monitoring and therefore Methane is considered not a significant risk to the proposed development. Consequently, no ground gas assessment has been undertaken for Methane. Carbon Dioxide The programme of ground gas monitoring detected Carbon Dioxide up to a maximum concentration of 5.8% v/v (expressed as 0.058 as a fraction) with no measurable flow rate detected. As no flow rate was recorded during the monitoring visits the gas monitors limit of detection for flow (0.1l/hr) will be utilised for calculating the GSV.

The maximum GSV for Carbon Dioxide is calculated as follows: • 0.058 x 0.1 = 0.0058l/h

5.5 Ground Gas Precautions

The following two classifications are provided for residential and commercial properties respectively: Residential Priorities with a Suspended Ground Floor (NHBC Classification) In accordance with Table 14.1 of NHBC Guidance the site may be classified as ‘Amber 1’ where the following gas precautions are required assuming that residential properties will have a suspended floor slab (e.g. beam and block): • Provision of a minimum 2000g DPM membrane with all joints and penetrations sealed. • Ventilated sub‐floor void (minimum one complete volume change per 24 hours). • Gas protection measures should be installed as prescribed in BRE Report 414. Consideration may be given to the design of gas precautions in accordance with CIRIA C665 and BS8485: 2007 should alternative foundation / floor slab proposals be considered in residential properties. Commercial Properties (CIRIA C665)

In accordance with CIRIA C665, the site may be may be classified as ‘CS2’ for commercial properties as follows:

• Reinforced concrete cast in situ floor slab (suspended, non suspended or raft) with at least

1200g DPM.

• Or alternately, bean and block or pre cast concrete slab and minimum 2000g DPM/reinforced gas membrane.


22

The recommendations also include possible underfloor venting but it is considered unnecessary in this instance due to the absence of measurable gas flow, the absence of methane and the relatively low concentrations of CO2 recorded.

All joints and penetrations should be sealed.


23

6.0 LABORATORY TESTING & CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT 6.1 Introduction

The following environmental soil testing was carried out on visually representative samples recovered from the exploratory holes to provide a general indication of the contamination status of the site:

• 12No. Standard contamination suites (including speciated PAH and TOC). • 12No. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (criteria working group methodology) (TPH). • Asbestos Screen.

Geotechnical soil testing comprised the following:

• 5No. Plasticity Index (PI) tests. • 10No. Water soluble sulphate tests. • 18No. pH tests. The environmental and geotechnical laboratory soil test results are presented in Appendix VI of this report.

6.2 Geotechnical Soil Test Results Water Soluble Sulphate/pH

Water soluble sulphate testing was undertaken on 4No. samples of Natural Strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) and revealed concentrations of <0.01g/l to 0.17g/l SO4. The pH values of the soil samples analysed ranged between 7.09 and 9.63. Adopting the highest concentration of water soluble sulphate (0.17g/l), and the mean of the lowest two measured pH values (7.46), in accordance with the Building Research Establishment publication Special Digest 1 ‘Concrete in Aggressive Ground’ (2005) the site falls into Design Sulphate Class DS‐1 and an Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC) classification of AC‐1. The foregoing designation assumes a brownfield location and potentially mobile groundwater conditions (due to the presence of water in the trial pits and groundwater monitoring wells).

Plasticity Index Testing Plasticity Index (PI) testing was undertaken on 5No. selected samples of visually Natural Strata (possibly reworked / disturbed). In accordance with NHBC 4.2‐D5(b) the reported PI value may be modified based on the portion of the sample retained on the 425µm sieve. The results of the PI analysis are summarised in Table 4.


24

TABLE 4 – SUMMARY OF PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) DATA

Sample Ref. Reported PI Value (%)

Portion Passing 425µm Sieve

Modified PI Value (%)

Volume Change Potential

TP1 1.00 33 100 33 Medium TP12 3.30‐3.60 Non Plastic NA NA Non Plastic WS4 2.30‐2.80 24 87 21 MediumWS5 2.80‐3.20 19 96 18 Low WS7 1.50‐2.00 17 86 15 Low

In accordance with NHBC Chapter 4.2, the adjusted PI values reveal that the Natural Strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) may be typically regarded as having a medium volume change potential. The results indict that the wet silty clayey fine to medium sand collected from TP12 is not non plastic.

6.3 Contamination Assessment Rationale

It is understood that it is proposed to redevelop the site with residential dwellings, sheltered accommodation and commercial units. The assessment of contamination test results has been undertaken adopting the Tier 1 SACs for both residential and commercial receptors (which have different SACs due to the variable sensitivity of the end use).

6.4 Appropriate Guidance

Reference has been made to documents reflecting current best practice, including (but not limited to) the following:

• Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Environment Agency

publication – ‘Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) model’ (March 2002). • R & D Publication SGV 10 (Lead). • Environment Agency Science Report, ‘Using Soil Guideline Values’, SC050021/SGV, March

2009. • Environment Agency Science Reports Arsenic SGV (May 2009), Nickel SGV, Mercury SGV,

Selenium SGV, Benzene SGV, Toluene SGV, Ethylbenzene SGV, Xylene SGV (all March 2009), Phenol and Cadmium (June 2009).

• R & D Draft Technical Report P5‐079/TR1 ‘Review of the Fate and Transport of Selected Contaminants in the Soil Environment’ dated 2003.

• Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) and Land Quality Management (LQM) publication ‘Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment’ 2nd Edition, July 2009, ISBN 0‐9547474‐7‐X.

• CL:AIRE/CIEH ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration’ (May 2008).

• Environment Agency Science Report SC050021/SR7 ‘Compilation of Data for Priority Organic Pollutants for Derivation of Soil Guideline Values’, dated November 2008, ISBN 978‐84432‐964‐9.

• Environment Agency Science Report Final SC050021/SR2 ‘Human health toxicological assessment of contaminants in soil’, dated January 2009, ISBN 978‐84432‐858‐1.

• Environment Agency Science Report SC050021/SR3 ‘Updated technical background to the CLEA model’, dated January 2009, ISBN 978‐84432‐856‐7.


25

6.4.1 Selection of Appropriate Tier 1 Screening Values

The assessment of contaminated land in the UK was historically undertaken with reference to ICRCL Guidance Note 59/83 together with successive versions of the CLEA model (inc. CLEA2002 (2002), CLEA UK (2005), CLEA V1.03 beta (2008), CLEA V1.04 (January 2009), CLEA V1.05 (September 2009) and CLEA V1.06 (October 2009)). The CLEA V1.06 model is a deterministic quantitative risk assessment (QRA) model which is proposed to be used to derive revised Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) for a range of contaminants. To date, CLEA derived SGVs have been published for the following contaminants: Arsenic, Cadmium, Nickel, Mercury, Selenium, Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene, Phenol, dioxins and furans. SGVs are derived adopting a Sandy Loam soil with 6% Soil Organic Matter (SOM). In accordance with general industry best practice, these published generic CLEA SGVs have been referred to in the first instance (where available) and have been adopted at Tier 1 level. Whilst the CLEA 2002 model has been formally withdrawn, the model currently provides the only publicly available Lead model adopted as UK policy/practice, consequently, the original SGV for Lead is retained herein. In the absence of published SGVs, Jackson Purdue Lever has adopted Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC) derived by CIEH/LQM. These are based on CLEA V1.06 final. The CIEH’s Howard Price has previously stated “This is a fantastic result and a great tribute to Paul and the LQM team, along with the volunteers who helped crunch the numbers. It’s a very good example of cross sector help, and frankly puts the official SGV programme to shame again. We expect that these values will quickly become the numbers of choice in both the public and private sectors. Relevant, appropriate, authoritative and scientifically‐based, they can be used with confidence and employed properly, we believe they will meet an important need in the risk assessment process” (Contaminated Land Bulletin August 2009). Taking account of the foregoing, we consider that industry best practice is currently best represented by CIEH/LQM GAC together with new SGV values and these have been adopted herein. The level of GAC selected for organic determinants is partially dependant upon Soil Organic Matter (SOM) content, with GAC values being available at 1%, 2.5% and 6% SOM as standard. In the following sections, all the Tier 1 assessment criteria have been collectively referred to as ‘Site Acceptance Criteria’ (SAC). The SAC adopted herein, assessed as a residential end use, are presented on the statistical assessment sheets presented in Appendix XI.

6.4.2 Site‐Specific Considerations The following site‐specific condition has been considered, at Tier 1 level, with respect to the soils at the site (as appropriate): • Soil Organic Matter (SOM) content.


26

The SOM content and soil type are used to provide an assessment of the applicability of the Tier 1 SAC adopted (the CLEA SGV are based on the default assumption of a UK Sandy Loam soil with 6% SOM, whilst the LQM GAC values are based upon SOM of 1%, 2.5% and 6%, as applicable). Determinants have in the first instance, been compared to standard CLEA SGVs together with CIEH/LQM GAC (adopting a conservative SOM of 1%). For BTEX determinants, Jackson Purdue Lever has utilised CLEA V1.04 final to derive SGVs relevant to 1% and 2.5% SOM. Where the determinant exceeds the relevant SAC at 1% SOM, a site specific SOM may be adopted as appropriate to derive new GAC and the dataset reassessed.

6.5 Statistical Considerations

Statistical tests relating to contaminated land, typically referred to as a Mean and Maximum Value Tests, were detailed in Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and The Environment Agency publication CLR 7 ‘Assessment of Risks to Human Health From Land Contamination: An Overview of the Development of Soil Guideline Values and Related Research’, dated 2002, ISBN 1‐857‐05732‐5. This guidance was superseded by publication of CL:AIRE/CIEH ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration dated May 2008.

6.5.1 Null and Alternative Hypothesis

In consideration of statistical guidance jointly published by CL:AIRE/CIEH ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration’, statistical convention requires consideration of the Null Hypothesis (expressed as Ho) or an Alternative Hypothesis (expressed as H1). Appropriate statistical tests are then applied to the data to assess whether the strength of evidence favours the Null or the Alternative Hypothesis. For the purpose of the following contamination assessments and in accordance with the CL:AIRE/CIEH guidance the key question for the site is as follows. Question ‐ ‘Is there sufficient evidence that the true mean concentration of a contaminant in soil (μ) is less than some critical concentration (Cc)?’ The Null and Alternative hypotheses are therefore defined as follows. The Null Hypothesis (Ho)

μ ≥ Cc (i.e. Tier 1 or 2 Assessment Criteria). The Alternative Hypothesis (H1) (the question the selected statistical test is designed to answer) μ < Cc (i.e. Tier 1 or 2 Assessment Criteria).

6.5.2 95th Percentile Upper Confidence Level Mean Values

The selected relevant statistical assessment undertaken to evaluate the Null and Alternative Hypotheses requires consideration of the 95th Percentile Upper Confidence Level Mean value (this is abbreviated as the UCL). The UCL value takes account the number of samples tested, the data set mean and the standard deviation of the data set and applies a correction factor to take account of the uncertainty of the data set.


27

CL:AIRE/CIEH guidance states that ‘since the 95% UCL is at most times greater than the true population mean, it follows that if the 95% UCL is less than Cc, the assessor will know (with a defined high level of confidence) that the true population mean (μ, the value which is not known) is also likely to be less than Cc’.

6.5.3 Considerations for Appropriate Dataset(s)

The CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance requires consideration of the appropriateness of the dataset being subjected to the statistical testing and notes the following three key elements to be considered. • Consideration of any non‐detects within the dataset. • Consideration of potential outliers within the dataset. • Consideration of the statistical distribution of the data (i.e. normality/non normality).

6.5.4 Consideration of Normality of Dataset

CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance notes that the choice of statistical test to be applied to the dataset will depend on the assumptions about the distribution of the data being tested. The assumptions of the statistical test adopted therefore must be appropriate to the distribution assumptions of the data being considered.

The CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance details the following two key statistical tests.

• The one‐sample t test assumes the data being assessed is approximately normally distributed.

• The one‐sided Chebychev Theorem – assumes the data being assessed does not demonstrate normality (method makes no assumption about the shape of the distribution).

CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance, however notes ‘…with large datasets, minor deviations from normality may be flagged as statistically significant even though small deviations from a normal distribution will not affect the reliability of the one sample t‐test’. The guidance goes on to note ‘Conversely, datasets with a small sample size more easily pass normality tests. Failing, however to detect non‐normality in a small dataset is unlikely to compromise the validity of the one sample t‐test’ [Jackson Purdue Lever emphasis added].

CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance further notes ‘When considering which of the two tests to use, however, assessors should bear in mind that, in general, the one‐sample t‐test is more powerful that the method based on the Chebychev Theorem…Given that the one sample t‐test is also not sensitive to moderate departures from normality, it is recommended that assessors use the t‐test unless there is good evidence that the dataset departs significantly from normality’ [Jackson Purdue Lever emphasis added].

On the basis of the above, an assumption of data normality has been made and the one‐sample t‐test adopted accordingly.


28

6.5.5 Consideration of Non‐Detects within the Dataset.

The dataset may reveal the presence of non‐detects for a number of the determinants tested. Where this occurs, we have adopted the LOD as the chemical concentration, which provides a suitably conservative approach.

However, please note that SACs have only been used for determinants where they are present at concentrations in excess of the LOD on at least one occasion.

6.5.6 Consideration of Outliers

The CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance advises that ‘…if outliers are identified, assessors have to decide whether they represent genuine soil concentrations or are the result of an error’.

The guidance further notes that outliers should only be excluded from a dataset where they ‘…are obviously and demonstrably the result of an error that can be identified and explained’ or ‘clearly indicate that more than one soil population exists within the dataset and this can be justified by (or informs the further development of) the conceptual model‐ in which case the different population expressed by the outliers(s) should be explored in more detail’.

Taking account of the foregoing, we have adopted a policy of interrogating the relevant dataset to calculate the UCL and to ascertain the possible presence of statistical outliers (where relevant). At this point the possible relevance of statistical outliers to the interpretation of the data is considered, in accordance with the following matrix.

TABLE 5 – OUTLIER DECISION MATRIX

UCL < SAC UCL > SAC

Outlier Test reveals No Hotspot(s)

Determinant present at acceptable concentrations.

Pervasive contamination present in soil at unacceptable concentrations.

Outlier Test reveals Hotspot(s)

Determinant present at acceptable concentrations. Possible second population identified. Only of potential concern where outlier is at an individual concentration in excess of the Tier 1 SAC.

Pervasive contamination present in soil at unacceptable concentrations with possible hotspots of contamination identified.

It should be noted that where the UCL of a determinant, and all individual determinant

concentrations are below the SAC, the outlier test has not been interrogated/interpreted.

6.5.7 CLEA Averaging Area

The CLEA Model requires consideration of an averaging area, i.e. an area within which the UCL is calculated and compared to the Tier 1 SAC. Within our assessments the site has been adopted as the averaging area in the first instance.


29

6.6 Sampling Strategy Our sampling strategy for the site is based on a review of the historical, geological and environmental information obtained as part of the Phase I Desk study together with the current setting of the site, access restrictions and the ground conditions encountered during our Phase II exploratory works. Visually representative soil samples were obtained during our Phase II works from across the site and subjected to chemical analysis for a suite of contaminants deemed appropriate based on our Land Use Assessment.

6.7 Contamination Soil Test Results

6.7.1 General Screening Suite – Made Ground (containing anthropogenic materials)

The contamination assessment for the Made Ground at the site is summarised in Table 6.

TABLE 6 ‐ SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SITE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (SAC) DATA ASSESSMENT ‐ MADE GROUND

Determinants No. of Samples Tested

Conc. Range (mg/kg)

Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)

Residential

Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)

Commercial

Site Average Area UCL

Tier 1 SAC Exceeded @ UCL (Yes/No)

Metals Arsenic 7 5‐48 32 CLEA SGV 640 CLEA SGV 36.7 Yes(Resi.) Cadmium 7 0.6‐4.1 10 CLEA SGV 230 CLEA SGV 3.2 NoChromium 7 11‐25 3000 GAC 30400 GAC 22.4 No

Lead 7 25‐240 450 CLEA SGV 750 CLEA SGV 96.9 NoNickel 7 9‐48 130 CLEA SGV 1800 CLEA SGV 39 No Mercury 7 <0.17‐1.1 170 CLEA SGV 3600 CLEA SGV 0.6 NoCopper 7 14‐219 2330 GAC 71700 GAC 135.2 No Selenium 7 1‐2 350 CLEA SGV 13000 CLEA SGV 1.8 No

Zinc 7 47‐131 3750 GAC 665000 GAC 121.1 NoPAHs

Acenapthene 7 0.1‐2.7 210 GAC 85000 GAC 1.4 NoFluorene 7 0.1‐1.5 160 GAC 64000 GAC 0.8 No

Phenanthrene 7 0.2‐17.8 92 GAC 22000 GAC 9.6 NoAnthracene 7 0.1‐2.8 2300 GAC 530000 GAC 1.5 No Fluoranthene 7 0.1‐42.6 260 GAC 23000 GAC 20.6 No

Pyrene 7 0.2‐38.7 560 GAC 54000 GAC 18.5 NoBenzo(a)anthracene 7 0.1‐23.7 3.1 GAC 90 GAC 11.3 Yes(Resi.)

Chrysene 7 0.1‐24.8 6.0 GAC 140 GAC 11.9 Yes(Resi.)Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene 7 0.2‐34.3 5.6 GAC 100 GAC 16.1 Yes(Resi.)

Benzo(a)pyrene 7 0.1‐22.5 0.83 GAC 14 GAC 10.51 Yes(Resi.)Indeno(123‐cd)pyrene 7 0.1‐12.2 3.2 GAC 60 GAC 5.7 Yes(Resi.) Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 7 0.1‐4.0 0.76 GAC 13 GAC 1.9 Yes(Resi.) Benzo(ghi)perylene 7 0.1‐17.3 44 GAC 650 GAC 8.1 NoAcenaphthylene 7 0.1‐0.9 170 GAC 84000 GAC 0.4 No Naphthalene 7 0.1‐3.0 1.5 GAC 200 GAC 1.5 Yes(Resi.)

Key * ‐ Geometric Mean (see SGV10 pg14). CLEA SGV ‐ CLEA Published Generic Soil Guideline Values. GAC ‐ CIEH/LQM Generic Assessment Criteria.


30

The UCL concentration for the following determinands were in excess of their respective Tier 1 SAC for a residential end use: • Arsenic. • Benzo(a)anthracene. • Chrysene. • Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene • Benzo(a)pyrene. • Indeno(123‐cd)pyrene. • Dibenzo(ah)anthracene. • Naphthalene.

An outlier test was undertaken for the above determinands to assess for the presence of potential contaminant ‘hot‐spots’. The Outlier Tests indicate that, based on the decision matrix presented in Table 5 and the data set available for assessment, the highest concentration of Arsenic is not a statistical outlier (i.e. not a contamination hot‐spot). The Outlier Test indicates that, based on the decision matrix presented in Table 4 and the data set available for assessment, the highest concentration of all of the above PAHs were statistical outliers (i.e. is a contamination hot‐spots). However, further consideration of the test results indicates that for a majority of these determinants there is more than one test result above the respective SAC. Therefore, whilst the highest value is a statistical outlier, the presence of other exceedances in the data set suggests that the contamination is also pervasive across the site. The remaining foregoing determinands were found to be present at UCL mean concentrations below the appropriate Tier 1 SAC for a residential end use. No individual or UCL concentrations were recorded above their respective Tier 1 SAC for a Commercial end use.

6.7.2 General Screening Suite – Natural Strata (possible reworked / disturbed natural soils) The contamination assessment for the natural strata (possible reworked / disturbed) at the site is summarised in Table 7.

TABLE 7 ‐ SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SITE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (SAC) DATA ASSESSMENT – NATURAL STRATA (POSSIBLE REWORKED)

Determinants No. of Samples Tested

Conc. Range (mg/kg)

Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)

Residential

Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)

Commercial

Site Average Area UCL

Tier 1 SAC Exceeded @ UCL (Yes/No)

Metals Arsenic 5 3‐7 32 CLEA SGV 640 CLEA SGV 6.2 No Cadmium 5 1.4‐2 10 CLEA SGV 230 CLEA SGV 1.9 NoChromium 5 25‐30 3000 GAC 30400 GAC 28.9 No

Lead 5 16‐33 450 CLEA SGV 750 CLEA SGV 20.1 NoNickel 5 18‐33 130 CLEA SGV 1800 CLEA SGV 31.3 No Mercury 5 0.17‐0.2 170 CLEA SGV 3600 CLEA SGV 0.2 No


31

TABLE 7 ‐ SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SITE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (SAC) DATA ASSESSMENT – NATURAL STRATA (POSSIBLE REWORKED)

Copper 5 15‐29 2330 GAC 71700 GAC 25.4 No Selenium 5 1‐2 350 CLEA SGV 13000 CLEA SGV 2.1 No

Zinc 5 61‐96 3750 GAC 665000 GAC 91.4 No PAHs

Acenapthene 5 0.1‐0.5 210 GAC 85000 GAC 0.4 No Fluorene 5 0.1‐0.4 160 GAC 64000 GAC 0.3 No

Phenanthrene 5 0.1‐2.5 92 GAC 22000 GAC 1.7 NoAnthracene 5 0.1‐0.6 2300 GAC 530000 GAC 0.4 No Fluoranthene 5 0.1‐1.4 260 GAC 23000 GAC 0.9 No

Pyrene 5 0.1‐1.4 560 GAC 54000 GAC 0.9 No Chrysene 5 0.1‐0.8 6.0 GAC 140 GAC 0.6 No

Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene 5 0.2‐0.7 5.6 GAC 100 GAC 0.5 No Benzo(a)pyrene 5 0.1‐0.5 0.83 GAC 14 GAC 0.35 No

Indeno(123‐cd)pyrene 5 0.1‐0.2 3.2 GAC 60 GAC 0.2 NoBenzo(ghi)perylene 5 0.1‐0.4 44 GAC 650 GAC 0.3 No

Naphthalene 5 0.1‐0.6 1.5 GAC 200 GAC 0.4 NoKey * ‐ Geometric Mean (see SGV10 pg14). CLEA SGV ‐ CLEA Published Generic Soil Guideline Values. GAC ‐ CIEH/LQM Generic Assessment Criteria.

The assessment of soil test results for the Natural Strata (reworked / disturbed) has not revealed the presence of any determinands at UCL concentrations elevated above their respective Tier 1 SAC assuming a residential end use.

6.7.3 TPH The results of the hydrocarbon testing indicate that the concentrations of hydrocarbons in nine of the twelve samples tested were below the laboratory level of detection. The concentrations of hydrocarbons in the remaining three samples were considered to be low (maximum 89.5mg/kg Total TPH). Furthermore, none of the fractions of TPH were in excess of their Tier 1 SAC for a residential end use.

6.7.4 Asbestos Six samples of the shallow Made Ground were screened for asbestos fibres. No free asbestos fibres were detected within the samples analysed.

6.8 Contamination Assessment Summary The results of the chemical testing undertaken at the site indicate that the individual and UCL concentrations of Arsenic and a number of PAHs in the shallow Made Ground are in excess of their respective Tier 1 SACs and may represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use. The concentrations detected in the Natural Strata (reworked / disturbed) are not considered likely to represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use The concentrations detected are considered unlikely to represent a significant risk to controlled waters due to their relative insolubility and limited mobility in the given environmental scenario.


32

7.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 7.1 General

The DEFRA publication ‘Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 2A Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance’ (dated April 2012) states the following with regards to the production of a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for a site: ‘The process of risk assessment involves understanding the risks presented by land, and the associated uncertainties. In practice, this understanding is usually developed and communicated in the form of a “conceptual model”. The development of a CSM is typically undertaken in an iterative process, reflecting the changes in understanding as more detailed site information becomes available. In developing a CSM, and specifically in the context of land contamination, consideration needs to be given to three essential elements; which form the basis of any risk present. The statutory guidance sections 3.8 and 3.9 (April 2012) states the following with respect to Part 2A. Under Part 2A, for a relevant risk to exist there needs to be one or more contaminant‐pathway‐receptor [CPR] linkages – “contaminant linkage” – by which a relevant receptor might be affected by the contaminants in question. In other words, for a risk to exist there must be contaminants present in, on or under the land in a form and quantity that poses a hazard, and one or more pathways by which they might significantly harm people, the environment, or property; or significantly pollute controlled waters. For the purposes of this guidance: (a) A “contaminant” is a substance which is in, on or under the land and which has the potential to

cause significant harm to a relevant receptor, or to cause significant pollution of controlled waters.

(b) A “receptor” is something that could be adversely affected by a contaminant, for example a person, an organism, and ecosystem, property, or controlled waters. The various types of receptors that are relevant under the Part 2A regime are explained in later sections.

(c) A “pathway” is a route by which a receptor is or might be affected by a contaminant.

‘The term “contaminant linkage” means the relationship between a contaminant, a pathway and a receptor. All three elements of a contaminant linkage must exist in relation to a particular land before the land can be considered potentially to be contaminated land under Part 2A, including evidence of the actual presence of contaminants. The term “significant contaminant linkage”, as used in this Guidance, means a contaminant linkage which gives rise to a level of risk sufficient to justify a piece of land being determined as contaminated land. The term “significant contaminant” means the contaminant which forms part of a significant contaminant linkage.’ With respect to the presence of background levels of contaminants, section 3.21 to 3.23 states ‘The Part 2A regime was introduced to help identify and deal with land which poses unacceptable levels of risk. It was not intended to apply to land with levels of contaminants in soil that are commonplace and widespread throughout England or parts of it, and for which in the very large majority of cases there is no reason to consider that there is an unacceptable risk.


33

Normal levels of contaminants in soil should not be considered to cause land to qualify as contaminated land, unless there is a particular reason to consider otherwise. Therefore, if it is established that land is at or close to normal levels of particular contaminants, it should usually not be considered further in relation to the Part 2A regime... For the purpose of this Guidance, “normal” levels of contaminants in soil may result from: (a) The natural presence of contaminants (e.g. caused by soil formation processes and underlying

geology) at levels that might reasonably be considered typical in a given area and have not been shown to pose an unacceptable risk to health or the environment.

(b) The presence of contaminants caused by low level diffuse pollution, and common human activity other than specific industrial processes. For example, this would include diffuse pollution caused by historic use of leaded petrol and the presence of benzo(a)pyrene from vehicle exhausts, and the spreading of domestic ash in gardens at levels that might reasonably be considered typical.’

In selecting appropriate generic assessment criteria Section 3.27 of the Guidance states: ‘It is common practice in contaminated land risk assessment to use “generic assessment criteria” (GACs) as screening tools in generic quantitative human health risk assessment to help assessors decide when land can be excluded from the need for further inspection and assessment, or when further work would be warranted’. With respect to assessing contaminated land, section 4.17 of the Guidance states: ‘In deciding whether or not land is contaminated land on grounds of significant possibility of significant harm to human health, the local authority should use the categorisations described in paragraphs 4.19 – 4.30 below. Categories 1 and 2 would encompass land which is capable of being determined as contaminated land on the grounds of significant possibility of harm to human health. Categories 3 and 4 would encompass land which is not capable of being determined on such grounds.’ In relation to the use of GAC values in the assessment of contaminated land, section 3.29 of the Guidance states: ‘GACs relating to human health risk assessment represent cautious estimates of levels of contaminants in soil at which there is considered to be no risk to health or, at most, a minimal risk to health. With regards to such GACs: (a) They may be used to indicate when land is very unlikely to pose a significant possibility of

significant harm to human health. This is on the basis that they are designed to estimate levels of contamination at which risks are likely to be negligible or minimal and far from posing a significant possibility of significant harm to human health.

(b) They should not be used as direct indicators of whether a significant possibility of significant harm to human health may exist. Also, the local authority should not view the degree by which the GACs are exceeded (in itself) as being particularly relevant to this consideration, given that the degree of risk posed by land would normally depend on many factors other than simply the amount of contaminants in soil.


34

(c) They should not be seen as screening levels which describe the boundary between Categories 3 and 4 in terms of Section 4 (i.e. the two Categories in which land would not be contaminated land on grounds of risk to human health). In the very large majority of cases, these SGVs/GACs describe levels of contamination from which risks should be considered to be comfortably within Category 4.

(d) They should not be viewed as indicators of levels of contamination above which detailed risk assessment would automatically be required under Part 2A.

(e) They should not be used as generic remediation targets under the Part 2A regime. Nor should they be used in this way under the planning system, for example in relation to ensuring that land affected by contaminated does not meet the Part 2A definition of contaminated land after it has been developed.’

In undertaking a risk assessment and deriving a CSM for the purposes of the redevelopment of a site (i.e. planning and development control) reference has been made to both the Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, as well as the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, dated March 2012). Reference has also been made to the Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance (referenced above), although this is primarily concerned with Local Government determinations of Statutory ‘Contaminated Land’, which is separate to planning framework requirements.

7.2 SPR Considerations

The following SPR assessment has been undertaken based on the assumption that the site is proposed to be redeveloped with residential housing (i.e. the most conservative end use within the proposed development). For the purpose of the following Conceptual Site Model we have considered the Made Ground to comprise the near surface soils containing significant amounts of anthropogenic materials. The underlying soils, which comprise entirely natural soils (although there is evidence to suggest that they may have been historically reworked / disturbed), are regarded as ‘natural soils’.

7.3 Consideration of Potential Sources of Contamination

The potential sources of contamination at the site are primarily:

• Metals and metalloids associated with any Made Ground. • Natural Metal Enrichment (NME) in Natural Strata. • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in any Made Ground. • Hydrocarbons associated with the historical use and storage of fuel/oil at the site. • Acid/Sulphate contaminated soils. • Asbestos.

7.4 Consideration of Potential Receptors

The potential receptors at the site are:

• The construction personnel (i.e. site workers) involved with the development of the site (typically short term (acute) exposure).

• The final end users i.e. occupants (typically long term (chronic) exposure). • Controlled waters.


35

• Buildings, construction materials and buried services. • Flora.

7.5 Consideration of Potential Pathways

The potential pathways at the site are primarily: • Direct ingestion of soil. • Plant uptake. • Direct skin contact with the ground. • Inhalation of dust. • Direct contact with buildings. • Vertical and lateral migration of contamination.

7.6 Summary

The conceptual site model of possible SPR pollutant linkages, produced by Jackson Purdue Lever, is summarised in Table 7. It must be understood that the foregoing SPR assessment relates to the sites proposed residential end use (as a conservative assessment).

TABLE 8 – SUMMARY OF SPR ASSESSMENT

Source/ Substance

Receptor Pathway Comments

Plau

sible

Pollu

tant

Link

age

Possible Mitigation

Possible Statutory

‘Contaminated Land’ following

mitigation

Contaminated Soils

Site Workers

Direct Ingestion & Direct Contact

Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground.

X Site workers to wear appropriate PPE for usual health and safety reasons.

X

Contaminated Soils

Site Workers

Inhalation of Dust

Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground. X

Site workers to wear appropriate PPE for usual health and safety reasons.

X

Contaminated Soils

End Users – Site Residents

Direct Ingestion & Direct Contact

Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground in excess of residential Tier 1 SACs.

X

Made Ground capped with 0.6m of approved clean soil in private gardens / soft landscaped areas of residential development. Alternatively, remove Made Ground from gardens / soft landscaped areas.

X


36

TABLE 8 – SUMMARY OF SPR ASSESSMENT

Source/ Substance

Receptor Pathway Comments

Plau

sible

Pollu

tant

Link

age

Possible Mitigation

Possible Statutory

‘Contaminated Land’ following

mitigation

Contaminated Soils

End Users – Site Residents

Inhalation of Dust

Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground in excess of residential Tier 1 SACs. Following site development, generation of significant levels of dust on a chronic basis unlikely.

X

Made Ground capped with 0.6m of approved clean soil in private gardens / soft landscaped areas of residential development. Alternatively, remove Made Ground from gardens / soft landscaped areas.

X

Contaminated Soils

Controlled Waters

Vertical and lateral migration

The concentrations of determinants detected are considered unlikely to represent a significant risk to controlled waters.

X

Specific remediation in relation to controlled waters considered unnecessary based on the chemical status of the soils analysed at the site.

X

Contaminated Soils

Building Materials

Direct contact

Design Class DS‐1/ACEC Class AC‐1 (BRE Spec. Digest 1).

X Adopt appropriate concrete mix to all buried concrete.

X

Contaminated Soils

Services Direct contact

Consult utility companies regarding appropriate utility materials (including water supply pipes).

?

Subject to comment by water supply provider.

X

Elevated Ground Gases

End Users & Building Envelope


Site classified as NHBC Amber 1 / CIRIA CS2.

Install appropriate ground gas precautions.

X

Radon End Users & Building Envelope


The site is located within an area which does not require radon protection measures in the construction of new dwellings and extensions

X

No radon precautions required in proposed dwellings.

X

KEY Where text is in Bold Italic item is potentially present. Where normal text is used item is not present/plausible. X ‐ Pollutant linkage not plausible. - Pollutant linkage plausible, mitigation required.

? ‐ Insufficient information, further work necessary.

In the foregoing SPR assessment, determinants identified by chemical analysis are only considered to be contaminated with respect to generic guidance where:

• The determinant is present at a UCL concentration above the appropriate Tier 1 SAC.


37

8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Ground Conditions Summary

Made Ground was encountered across the site to depths ranging between 0.75m to in excess of 4.65m (TP8). The Made Ground included anthropogenic materials (such as brick, slag, ash etc.) presumably derived from historical uses of the site. Underlying the Made Ground, variable natural strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) ranging from a soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand, was encountered to a maximum proven depth of 7.00m begl.

Whilst these soils did not include anthropogenic materials, there was evidence to suggest that they may have been reworked and / or disturbed in the past. The composition and strength of the soils was highly variable between test hole locations, with very soft peaty soils locally present, relatively high groundwater and collapsing excavations. Historically, the site appears to have been located at the edge of a flood plain (1848), with ground levels rising significantly in the southern part of the site. The site appears to have been subsequently regraded to accommodate Padiham Railway Station and associated sidings (circa late 19th century) and it is anticipated that this is when significant raising of ground levels occurred locally, presumably using natural soils excavated from elsewhere within the site. Therefore, the reworked materials have been in place over 100 years and in that time period have been locally surcharged by activities on site. The visual appearance of these reworked soils is therefore similar to natural Glacial Till deposits, although their significant variability in composition and strength appear to indicate reworking / disturbance of the soils.

8.2 Foundation Design Significant thickness of Made Ground (locally in excess of 4.65m) were encountered across the site, particularly in the west. Due to the high likelihood of extensive cut and fill works it is possible that reworked natural strata is present across much of the site. Given the absence of anthropogenic inclusions in the reworked natural strata the boundary between this material and the underlying natural strata is ambiguous. However, the material currently logged as ‘Possible Reworked Natural Strata’ is typically variable and locally poor in strength and is generally considered to be unsuitable for traditional spread foundations. Therefore, foundation solutions, such as piles or ground improvement (e.g. vibro stone columns or dynamic compaction techniques) are likely to be required for the proposed low rise residential and commercial developments. The advice of suitably competent piling and ground improvement contractors should be sought to determine the feasibility of this option. Further deep boreholes are recommended to prove the depth of competent bedrock and assist with foundation design.


38

8.3 Floor Slabs Commercial Buildings

Ground bearing floor slabs will be appropriate for lightly loaded floor slabs where a limited depth of geotechnically competent ground is present. This would be subject to Structural Engineer design taking account of loading characteristics and tolerable settlement. Improvement of the ground by proof rolling of the formation and the inclusion of geotextile reinforcement in capping materials is recommended if ground bearing floor slabs are to be considered. Alternatively, ground floors may be designed as suspended. Residential Dwellings Made Ground has been encountered in excess of 0.60m across the site and therefore a suspended floor slab should be adopted. Suspended floors may be either reinforced concrete cast in‐situ or a pre‐cast concrete suspended floor with a clear ventilated void (i.e. beam and block), although if gas precautions in accordance with NHBC ‘Amber 1’ classification are proposed a beam and block floor will be required. Beam and block floors with a clear void and heave precautions will be required if deepening due to trees in excess of 1.50m depth.

8.4 Radon

The Landmark report for the site identifies that the site is not located within a radon affected area, and no radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensions.

8.5 Gas Precautions

The following two classifications are provided for residential and commercial properties respectively: Residential Priorities with a Suspended Ground Floor (NHBC Classification) In accordance with Table 14.1 of NHBC Guidance the site may be classified as ‘Amber 1’ where the following gas precautions are required assuming that residential properties will have a suspended floor slab (e.g. beam and block): • Provision of a minimum 2000g DPM membrane with all joints and penetrations sealed. • Ventilated sub‐floor void (minimum one complete volume change per 24 hours). • Gas protection measures should be installed as prescribed in BRE Report 414. Consideration may be given to the design of gas precautions in accordance with CIRIA C665 and BS8485: 2007 should alternative foundation / floor slab proposals be considered in residential properties. Commercial Properties (CIRIA C665)

In accordance with CIRIA C665, the site may be may be classified as ‘CS2’ for commercial properties as follows:


39

• Reinforced concrete cast in situ floor slab (suspended, non suspended or raft) with at least 1200g DPM.

• Or alternately, beam and block or pre cast concrete slab and minimum 2000g DPM/reinforced gas membrane.

The recommendations also include possible underfloor venting but it is considered unnecessary in this instance due to the absence of measurable gas flow, the absence of methane and the relatively low concentrations of Carbon Dioxide recorded.

All joints and penetrations should be sealed.

8.6 Building Near Trees

Foundations designs will require adjusting when building near existing, recently removed or proposed trees due to the presence of shallow cohesive soils beneath the site. Laboratory testing has generally revealed soils with a medium volume change potential and we would recommend that this classification is adopted for design purposes. The results indicate that the wet silty clayey fine to medium sand collected from TP12 is non plastic.

8.7 Coal Mining The coal mining report obtained for the site does not indicate the presence of any mining related issues which may adversely impact the redevelopment of the site. Therefore, no coal mining related investigations or precautions are considered necessary at the site.

8.8 Water Water was encountered during the advancement of nine of the twenty two exploratory holes as a slight to rapid seepage at depths ranging between 0.60 and 3.30m begl. The depth of the groundwater, as indicated during the four groundwater monitoring visits, varied between 0.51m and 2.34m begl. It is considered that excavations may locally require dewatering due to the presence of perched groundwater.

8.9 Excavations

The sides of eight of the twenty two exploratory holes were observed to collapse during the short period of time they were open. Several of the trial pits collapsed from the surface to the base of the hole. Consequently, excavations may require trench support. The requirement for trench support should be assessed by the groundworks contractor prior to commencing site works.


40

8.10 Slope Stability / Retaining Walls Upon completion of the final development proposals (including proposed ground levels), an assessment of the impact of embankments / retaining walls (situated at the sites periphery) in relation to the proposed development layout should be commissioned to identify any specific requirements / constraints. Foundations and roads etc should be designed such that lateral loads are not imposed on the slopes and retaining walls. In conjunction with the above, an engineer assessment of the structural integrity of the retaining walls should be undertaken.

8.11 Sulphate Classification

Based on the laboratory soil test results, and in accordance with the Building Research Establishment publication Special Digest 1 ‘Concrete in Aggressive Ground’ (2005), the site falls into Design Sulfate Class DS‐1 and an Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC) classification of AC‐1.

Therefore an appropriate concrete mix should be adopted in accordance with BRE Special Digest 1 for all buried concrete in contact with the ground.

8.12 CBRs and Pavements

Typical CBR values of less than 2% could be initially anticipated at the site, subject to confirmation by in‐situ testing. However, a higher CBR value may be achieved locally during testing and following proof rolling of the formation layer. We would recommend that Topsoil (where present) is removed from beneath roads and hardstanding areas to avoid the potential for differential settlement.

8.13 Soakaways The use of soakaway drainage is unlikely to be feasible due to the depth of the Made Ground, the low permeability clayey soils which underlie the site at shallow depth and the presence of localised very shallow groundwater.

8.14 Contamination Assessment

The results of the chemical testing undertaken at the site indicate that the individual and UCL concentrations of Arsenic and a number of PAHs in the shallow Made Ground are in excess of their respective Tier 1 SACs and may represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use. The concentrations detected are not considered likely to represent a significant risk to areas of commercial development at the site. The concentrations of TPH revealed during the current phase of exploratory works at the site were below detection or recorded in low concentrations (less than the Tier 1 SACs for human health for a residential end use). However, during a previous phase of works undertaken by others (2006), elevated concentrations of TPH were encountered at three locations across the site. These concentrations of TPH were not carbon banded and thus cannot be compared to Tier 1 SACs.


41

The elevated concentrations of TPH were associated with Made Ground which included a constituent of ash or tarmacadam. When extracted with a solvent and analysed these materials can contain TPH in the mineral / diesel range. Visual and olfactory evidence of contamination was generally absent (excluding TP2 and WS2 where no elevated concentrations of TPH were detected) from the current and previous exploratory holes advanced at the site. Consequently, in light of the above, it is considered likely that the previous elevated concentrations of TPH detected were associated with the ash or tarmacadam constituents of the Made Ground and not leakages or spillages of hydrocarbons during historical site activities. The concentrations detected are considered unlikely to represent a significant risk to controlled waters due to their relative insolubility and limited mobility in the given environmental scenario.

8.15 Remediation Proposals Due to the potential risk to human health represented by the elevated concentrations of Arsenic and PAHs in the Made Ground remediation measures are required where residential development (private dwellings and the sheltered accommodation) is proposed at the site as follows: • A capping layer may be imported to site and placed in private gardens (0.60m thickness) and

soft landscaped areas (0.30m thickness) allowing the Made Ground to remain in‐situ where development levels permit.

• Alternatively, the Made Ground may be excavated from gardens and soft landscaped areas

and either removed off site to a licensed waste management facility or reused beneath areas of proposed hard standing.

The above recommendations are subject to Local Authority approval. Due to the historical use and storage of hydrocarbons over a pronged period at the site, the presence of undetected concentrations of hydrocarbons locally across the site which may require remedial action cannot be discounted (see Section 8.18), particularly as the location of above ground and underground fuel storage tanks has not been located and chemically validated. Further works should be undertaken to establish if the former underground fuel tanks in the west of the site are still present. Validation works should be undertaken in the soils underlying the tanks to confirm if hydrocarbon impaction is present. If hydrocarbon impaction is present remedial works may be required. A Remediation Method Statement and Remediation Validation Report are likely to be required by the Local Authority.

8.16 Topsoil

Topsoil was observed to be generally absent from the site. It will therefore be necessary to import additional topsoil for placement in proposed gardens and soft landscaped areas. Any imported soils should be tested at source to ensure they are suitably clean (prior to importation) in accordance with CLEA/generic guidance. Any imported topsoil should confirm to BS3882: 2007 ‘Specification for topsoil and requirements for use’, with respect to the presence of foreign objects, and ideally nutrient levels etc.


42

8.17 Off‐site Disposal

If off‐site disposal is required the chemical testing regime can be different to the chemical testing required to assess the suitability of the soils for retention on site and the risks to human health and controlled waters. Therefore, effectively a new contamination assessment may be required to classify the soils for off‐site disposal with testing criteria to assess whether the soil is hazardous, non‐hazardous or inert waste. We would be pleased to undertake Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) testing of any soils proposed for disposal to landfill if requested. In the first instance, the test results from this investigation should be supplied to landfill operators to determine likely disposal costs before WAC testing is carried out.

8.18 Unforeseen Circumstances

Should any areas of potentially contaminated soil be encountered during site construction works, we would recommend consultation with Jackson Purdue Lever to ensure that our recommendations continue to apply. Due to the historical legacy of the site there is the potential for localised areas of contaminated soils to be present that have not been identified during the site investigation works (e.g. in areas where fuel tanks were present). However, based on our works to date, these should be localised to the source rather than the widespread across the site.

Any potentially contaminated soils should be left in‐situ and subjected to further assessment, to potentially include further chemical testing and risk assessment.

The following procedure should be adhered to if any areas of previously unidentified suspected contamination are encountered during the development of the site: i. Suspected contaminated material will remain in‐situ. ii. Jackson Purdue Lever to be notified, and will inform the Local Authority Environmental

Health Department and NHBC (if appropriate). iii. Jackson Purdue Lever will undertake a visual assessment of the possible contamination,

followed by appropriate sampling/testing (as necessary). iv. If necessary, an appropriate strategy to remove/remediate the contamination will be

submitted to the Local Authority and NHBC. 8.19 Construction Workers

It is recommended that construction personnel involved with direct contact with the soils at the site use appropriate PPE equipment together with welfare facilities in accordance with general health and safety guidelines.

8.20 Utilities

We would recommend that this report is supplied to utility companies (including water supply), and that their recommendations relating to appropriate supply pipes are adhered to.


43

8.21 Licenses, Permits, Registrations and Approvals

The Contractor/Developer is responsible for, and must ensure that, all necessary licenses, permits, plans, registrations and approvals are in place prior to commencing with the works at the site. These will include any Site Waste Management Plans/Materials Management Plans, Mobile Treatment Licenses (MTLs) and/or Waste Management Licenses/Exemptions as necessary to enable the completion of the proposed works.

8.22 Statutory Consultation

In accordance with normal planning requirements, we would recommend that a copy of our report is issued by the Client to the Local Authority (and NHBC, if necessary) for review/comment and approval prior to commencing with the redevelopment of the site.

8.23 Further Works

• Further deep shell & auger boreholes to assist in foundation design. • Establish whether underground fuel tanks are still present in the west of the site.

Subsequently, remove tanks (where present), validate underlying soils and remediate as necessary.

• Engineer assessment of retaining walls.

APPENDIX I

Site Location Plan

REL00396

Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS

Client Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd Checked Project Station Road Approved

Padiham Scale NTSDate Drawn 06/12/2012

Title Site Location PlanRev.

REPRODUCED FROM THE ORDNANCE SURVEY MAP WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. LICENCE NO. AL 100050180

Figure No. REL00396/01

SITE LOCATION

APPENDIX II

Annotated Site Plan

Project No. Drawn GJS

Client Checked Project Date Drawn Approved

ScaleRevision

NTSFigure No. REL00396/02

REPRODUCED FROM LDA Design Red Line Plan dated Dec. 2010 (ref. 3067_100)

REL00396 Title Annotated Site PlanRenaissanace Land Regeneration LtdStation Road, Padiham 06/12/2012

Pathways

APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY Estimated 5‐6m

bank

Former railway embankment sloping downwards to the

north

School

Approx. 4m retaining wall

RailwayBridge

Approx. 1m retaining wall

Approx. 2m retaining wallretaining site

levels

Commercial Premises

Yard

Residential Housing

Leisure Centre

Residential Housing

Estimated 5‐6m bank

Stockpile of brick & concrete

Estimated 5m retaining wall

Predominantly gravel surfaced site with sporadic grasses, shrubs and trees

Former railway embankment sloping downwards to the

north

RailwayBridge

APPENDIX III

Site Plan Showing General Site Views



ScaleRevision



REL00396 Title Plan Showing General Site ViewsRenaissanace Land Regeneration LtdStation Road, Padiham 06/12/2012

NTS

APPENDIX IV

Exploratory Hole Location Plan & Depth of Made Ground



ScaleRevision


REL00396 Title Trial Pit and Window Sample Borehole Location PlanRenaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd

Station Road, Padiham 06/12/2012


APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY

NB: All locations shown are approximate

Trial Pit

KEYWindow Sample Borehole

(G) Ground Gas Monitoring Well

WS1

WS2 (G)

WS3

WS4 (G)

WS5 (G)

WS6

WS7 (G)

WS8 (G)

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4TP5

TP6

TP7

TP8

TP9

TP10

TP11

TP12

TP13

TP14



ScaleRevision


REL00396 Title Plan Indicating Depth of Made Ground (anthropogenic inclusions)Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd

Station Road, Padiham 06/12/2012


APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY

NB: All locations shown are approximate

Trial Pit

KEYWindow Sample Borehole

(G) Ground Gas Monitoring Well

[1.00] Depth of Made Ground

[1.00+] Depth of Made Ground (m) Unproven

WS1

WS2 (G)

WS3

WS4 (G)

WS5 (G)

WS6

WS7 (G)

WS8 (G)

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4TP5

TP6

TP7

TP8

TP9

TP10

TP11

TP12

TP13

TP14

[2.00]

[2.00]

[0.95]

[1.00]

[1.70]

[0.50+]

[1.00]

[1.00]

[0.75]

[1.00+]

[1.10]

[1.50][0.85]

[0.30]

[2.20]

[4.65+]

[0.60]

[1.80]

[2.50]

[1.10]

[1.00]

[1.50]

APPENDIX V

Exploratory Hole Logs

Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)

Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests

Description of Strata

(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:

Field Book Ref:Plant:

Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=

Standard Penetration Test


=

=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)

(Split Spoon)

(Cone)

1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3.Borehole terminated at 3.00m due to SPT refusal.

GS

25/10/2012

Station Road, Padiham

GS1201

Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd

Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS1

WS1

0.30

0.80

1.00-1.45

2.00-2.452.10

2.30-2.80

3.00-3.45

D

D

C

CD

B

C

D1

D2

D3

B1

4

4

50/140mm

(0.70)

0.70

(1.00)

1.70(0.30)2.00

(0.95)

2.953.00

Loose grey-brown sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly subangular brick and concrete(MADE GROUND)

Soft to firm grey-brown slightly gravellysandy clay. Gravel is predominantly fine tomedium subangular brick and coal with frequentcarbonaceous inclusions(MADE GROUND)

Soft to firm grey-brown silty sandy gravellyclay. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Very loose brown very silty SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Hard red-brown to yellow very gravelly CLAY.Gravel is predominantly fine to mediumsubrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

End of Borehole at 3.00 m

1:50

Sheet 1 of 1


Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests


(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:


Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=



=


(Split Spoon)

(Cone)

1.Borehole sides stable.2.Water encountered at 1.00m.3. Plain pipe with bentonite seal installed from ground level to 1.00m, slotted pipe with gravel surround installed from

1.00m to 3.70m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.5.Borehole terminated at 4.00m due to SPT refusal on hard strata.

GS

25/10/2012


GS1201


Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS2

WS2

0.40

1.00-1.45

2.00-2.452.10

2.70

3.00-3.45

3.80

4.00-4.45

D/J/V

C

CD/J/V

D/J/V

C

J/V

C

D1/J1/V1

D2/J2/V2

D3/J3/V3

J4/V4

10

50/290mm

11

50/265mm

(1.00)

1.00

(1.00)

2.00

(0.50)

2.50

(1.45)

3.954.00

Medium dense black-brown gravel to cobblegrade brick, concrete and sandstone in an ashyclay matrix(MADE GROUND)

No recovery(NO RECOVERY)

Soft brown locally black stained wet sandySILT with a slight to moderate hydrocarbonodour(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Medium dense brown wet SAND and GRAVEL with amoderate hydrocarbon odour. Gravel ispredominanty fine to medium subroundedquartzite and flint(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Medium dense grey-brown silty clayey GRAVEL.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:50

Sheet 1 of 1


Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests


(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:


Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=



=


(Split Spoon)

(Cone)

1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3.Borehole terminated at 1.00m due to SPT refusal on hard strata.

GS

25/10/2012


GS1201


Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS3

WS3

0.50

1.00-1.45

D/J/V

C

D1/J1/V1

50/60mm

(0.80)

0.800.951.00

Loose to medium dense black-brown sandygravel. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subangular ash, brick, limestone, coal,clinker, concrete and sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Sandstone cobble(MADE GROUND)

Very stiff to stiff brown gravelly very siltyvery sandy CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subangular to subrounded sandstoneand quartzite(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:50

Sheet 1 of 1


Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests


(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:


Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=



=


(Split Spoon)

(Cone)

1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3. Plain pipe with bentonite seal installed from ground level to 1.00m, slotted pipe with gravel surround installed from

1.00m to 2.00m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.5.Borehole terminated at 2.00m due to refusal on hard strata (possible sandstone cobble).

GS

25/10/2012


GS1201


Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS4

WS4

0.20

0.70

1.00-1.451.10

2.00-2.45

2.30-2.80

D

D/J/V

CD/J/V

C

B

D1

D2/J1/V1

D3/J2/V2

B1

4

50/235mm

(0.40)

0.40

0.60

(0.40)

1.00

(1.00)

2.00

Dark brown sandy clayey topsoil(MADE GROUND)

Gravel to cobble grade sandstone in a gravellyclay matrix(MADE GROUND)

Loose black ashy sand(MADE GROUND)

Soft to firm becoming hard brown gravellysandy CLAY. Gravel is predominanty fine tomedium subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:50

Sheet 1 of 1


Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests


(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:


Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=



=


(Split Spoon)

(Cone)


1.00m to 4.00m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.

GS

25/10/2012


GS1201


Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS5

WS5

0.50

0.80

1.00-1.45

2.00-2.45

2.50

2.80-3.20

3.00-3.453.00

4.00-4.45

5.00-5.45

6.00-6.45

6.50

7.00-7.45

D

D

C

C

D

B

CD

C

C

C

D

C

D1

D2

D3

B1

D4

D5

8

32

8

10

16

16

40

(0.30)0.30

(0.40)

0.70

(1.00)

1.70

(1.10)

2.80

(4.10)

6.907.00

Loose light brown sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly fine to medium subangularlimestone(MADE GROUND)

Loose to medium dense brown gravel to cobblegrade sandstone and mudstone(MADE GROUND)

Firm ashy gravelly sandy clay. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangularsandstone(MADE GROUND)

Hard becoming firm grey-brown sandy gravellyclayey SILT. Gravel is predominanty fine tomedium subangular to subrounded sandstone andquartzite(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Firm to stiff grey-brown gravelly very sandysilty CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subangular sandstone and quartzite(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Slightly clayey silty sandy PEAT(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:50

Sheet 1 of 1


Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests


(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:


Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=



=


(Split Spoon)

(Cone)

1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3.Borehole terminated at 0.50m due to hard strata.

GS

25/10/2012


GS1201


Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS6

WS6

(0.50)

0.50

Loose grey-brown gravelly sand. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangularconcrete(MADE GROUND)


1:50

Sheet 1 of 1


Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests


(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:


Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=



=


(Split Spoon)

(Cone)



GS

25/10/2012


GS1201


Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS7

WS7

0.30

0.70

1.00-1.451.10

1.50-2.00

2.00-2.45

2.50

3.00-3.45

4.00-4.45

5.00-5.45

6.00-6.45

D

D/J/V

CD

B

C

D

C

C

C

C

D1

D2/J1/V1

D3

B1

D4

11

9

5

7

7

14

(0.60)

0.60

(0.40)

1.00

(5.00)

6.00

Loose grey sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangularlimestone and macadam(MADE GROUND)

Firm brown sandy gravelly clay. Gravel ispredominantly fine to medium subangular brick,coal, ash and concrete(MADE GROUND)

Firm grey-brown gravelly sandy very siltyCLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular to subrounded quartzite andsandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...becoming silty below 2.00m


1:50

Sheet 1 of 1


Project No.

Type Sample SPT

(m) Ref"N"

Value

Samples and Tests


(m)

Casing

(m)

Ground-water

Installation

Remarks:

Project:

Logged:

Date:

Client:

Checked:

Approved:


Scale:

Drawing Ref:

Key: D

U

B

J

W

=

=

=

=

=

Disturbed Sample

Undisturbed Sample

Bulk Sample

Jar Sample

Water Sample

S

C

=

=



=


(Split Spoon)

(Cone)



GS

25/10/2012


GS1201


Competitor Rig

REL00396

WS8

WS8

0.20

0.901.00-1.45

1.10

2.00-2.45

3.00-3.45

4.00-4.45

5.00-5.45

D

J/VCD

C

C

C

C

D1

J2/V2

D29

4

6

9

19

(0.30)0.30

(0.50)

0.80

1.00

(4.00)

5.00

Loose black sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly fine to medium subangularmudstone and clinker(MADE GROUND)

Loose to medium dense yellow to brown gravelto cobble grade sandstone in a clayey matrix(MADE GROUND)

Firm grey-brown silty sandy gravelly clay.Gravel is predominantly fine to mediumsubangular sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Soft to stiff grey-brown gravelly sandy siltyCLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular to subrounded quartzite andsandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...30% recovery between 1.00m to 2.00m


1:50

Sheet 1 of 1

LegendDepth

Project No:

Description of Strata(m)

Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:

Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:

Scale:

Drawing No.

Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2

W = Water Sample

J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)


1.Trial pit sides unstable from 1.65m.2.Water encountered at 1.65m.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201

Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd

JCB 3CX

TP1

TP1REL00396

0.100.15

0.30

0.450.50

0.750.750.75

1.001.001.101.101.10

1.65

1.75

2.10

2.60

2.70

T1

T2

T3

T4/B1

T5

J1

D

D

D

D/B

D

J

SV

SV

686462

908088

Loose brownish grey sandy slightly cobbly gravel ofsandstone with inclusions of brick and black shale(MADE GROUND)

Loose black silty gravel with occasional glasspieces and slag. Gravel is predominantly fine tomedium angular ash(MADE GROUND)

Firm greenish brown becoming orange-brown and lightbrown silty very sandy clay(MADE GROUND)

...with timbers in southern side of pit and aslight organic odour to 0.80m

Stiff fissured light brown and light grey siltygravelly CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subrounded to subangular mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

...with pockets of sand and fragments oforange-brown sandstone below 1.45m

Very loose light grey fine to coarse grainedgravelly SAND. Gravel is predominantly medium tocoarse subrounded sandstone and mudstone withoccasional mudstone and sandstone cobbles(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Medium dense brown very sandy fine to coursesubrounded to subangular GRAVEL and COBBLE of flintand sandstone with moderate hydrocarbon/tar odourand metallic sheen(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Firm brown and grey sandy gravelly CLAY(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Continued on next sheet

1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable from 1.65m.2.Water encountered at 1.65m.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP1

TP1REL00396

3.00

3.20

J2 JFirm brown and grey sandy gravelly CLAY(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

End of Trial Pit at 3.20 m

1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Water encountered at 0.65m.3.Trial pit terminated at 1.00m due to rapid water ingress.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP2

TP2REL00396

1.00

Brown sandy gravel and cobble of concrete and rarebrick with rare polythene(MADE GROUND)

...with a layer of concrete cobble at 0.80m


1:20

Sheet 1 of 1

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable within Made Ground.2.Water encountered at 1.10m.3.Trial pit terminated at 2.75m due to hard strata.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP3

TP3REL00396

0.50

1.10

1.201.20

2.50

2.75

T1/J1

B1T2/J2

T3

D/J

BD/J

D

Loose light grey and black silty sandy gravel andcobble of limestone, slag, ash, bitumen and flintwith large boulders of sandstone(MADE GROUND)

...with a layer of large sandstone boulders at0.80m

Very stiff greyish brown fissured very sandygravelly SILT/CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subangular black mudstone and shale withcobbles and rare boulders of mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 1 of 1

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing from 0.80m.2.Water encountered at 3.30m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.65m due to sidewalls collapsing.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP4

TP4REL00396

0.40

0.50

0.80

1.00

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.202.202.20

2.50

T1/J1

T2

T3/J2

B1

T4

D/J

D

D/J

B

D

SV 252822

Light brown sandy gravel of limestone(MADE GROUND)

...with fragments of macadam surfacing at southernend of pit

Stiff grey gravelly cobbly clayey sandy silt.Gravel and cobble is predominantly medium to coarseflint and mudstone(MADE GROUND)

Medium dense rusty brown sandy gravel and cobble offlint, sandstone, whole brick, rusty slag andpockets of black sandy ash(MADE GROUND)

Firm brown very sandy very gravelly CLAY withcobble of mudstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subrounded mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

..becoming soft and damp below 2.20m


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing from 0.80m.2.Water encountered at 3.30m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.65m due to sidewalls collapsing.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP4

TP4REL00396

3.10

3.65

SV 15Firm brown very sandy very gravelly CLAY withcobble of mudstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subrounded mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...becoming grey and very soft below 3.10m


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Slight water seepage at 1.10m.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP5

TP5REL00396

0.20

0.30

0.85

1.001.00

2.002.00

T1/J1

B1T2/J2

T3

D/J

BD/J

DSV 35

Light grey sandy fine to coarse gravel and cobbleof concrete(MADE GROUND)

Stiff brown and light brown silty gravelly claymixed with black fine to coarse sandy ash with rareslag(MADE GROUND)

...with a concrete slab with sub-base between 0.80mto 1.10m in northern end of pit

Very stiff fissured brownish grey clayey very sandygravelly cobbly SILT. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subrounded to angular black mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

...becoming soft and with occasional large bouldersof mudstone below 2.00m


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Slight water seepage at 1.10m.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP5

TP5REL00396

3.00

3.50

4.00

T4 D

SV 18Very soft grey gravelly cobbly SILT with boulders(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable from surface to base of pit.2.Water seepage encountered at 2.20m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.40m due to sidewalls collapsing.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP6

TP6REL00396

0.100.15

0.30

0.450.50

1.50

2.50

T1

T2/J1

T3/J2

B1

T4

D

D/J

D/J

B

D

Black sandy gravel of limestone, shale andsandstone(MADE GROUND)

Loose grey sandy gravel of limestone(MADE GROUND)...with 120mm diameter steel pipe filled withconcrete encountered at 0.30m

Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND withlenses of soft very sandy clay(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

...becoming damp and medium dense below 1.30m

...with running sand at 2.20m


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable from surface to base of pit.2.Water seepage encountered at 2.20m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.40m due to sidewalls collapsing.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP6

TP6REL00396

3.40

Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND withlenses of soft very sandy clay(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable below 2.40m.2.Water encountered at 2.60m with running sand.3.Trial pit terminated due to running sand conditions.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP7

TP7REL00396

0.35

0.50

0.75

1.001.00

2.00

2.10

2.20

2.40

2.50

T1/J1

B1T2/J2

T3

T4

D/J

BD/J

D

D

SV 40

Light brown fine to medium subangular gravel oflimestone(MADE GROUND)

Medium dense brown sandy gravel and cobbles offlint, sandstone, mudstone with large boulders andfragments of sandstone and occasional timberfragments(MADE GROUND)

Very stiff fissured greenish brown slightly clayeyvery sandy gravelly cobbly silt with occasionalboulders(MADE GROUND)

...with local pockets of black silt, rare ceramic,wood fragments and coal

Firm fissured greenish brown slightly clayey verysandy gravelly cobbly silt with occasional bouldersand fragments of partially burnt shale(MADE GROUND)

Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable below 2.40m.2.Water encountered at 2.60m with running sand.3.Trial pit terminated due to running sand conditions.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP7

TP7REL00396

3.40

Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides generally stable.2.Water encountered at 0.95m from base of granular Made Ground.3.Trial pit terminated at 4.65m as full extent of JCB reached.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP8

TP8REL00396

0.50

1.00

1.25

1.40

1.50

2.50

T1/J1

B1

T2/J2

D/J

B

D/J

SV

SV

40

45

Medium dense brownish grey becoming grey cobble andgravel of sandstone, mudstone, bricks and concrete(MADE GROUND)

...with abundant boulders of sandstone and mudstoneand some timber below 1.00m

Firm brown slightly silty slightly sandy gravellyclay with local inclusions and pockets of blacksandy silt, red shale and yellow sandstone(MADE GROUND)

...with rare gravel of concrete, slag and ashbetween 2.50m to 3.00m


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides generally stable.2.Water encountered at 0.95m from base of granular Made Ground.3.Trial pit terminated at 4.65m as full extent of JCB reached.

25/10/2012

CJPGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP8

TP8REL00396

3.00

4.65

T3/J3 D/JFirm brown slightly silty slightly sandy gravellyclay with local inclusions and pockets of blacksandy silt, red shale and yellow sandstone(MADE GROUND)

...with a large sandstone boulder at 4.00m


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Water encountered at 0.60m as slight seepage.3.Shear vane readings taken at 2.00m are ex-situ.

26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP9

TP9REL00396

0.30

0.60

0.70

0.800.800.80

1.70

2.002.002.00

D1

D2

D3

D/J/V

D

D

SV

SV

509555

202025

Loose black sand and gravel with frequentsubrounded to subangular cobbles. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular ash,clinker, brick, ceramic and sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Firm becoming soft grey-brown silty sandy gravellyCLAY with occasional sandstone cobbles. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Water encountered at 0.60m as slight seepage.3.Shear vane readings taken at 2.00m are ex-situ.

26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP9

TP9REL00396

4.40

Firm becoming soft grey-brown silty sandy gravellyCLAY with occasional sandstone cobbles. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing.2.Water encountered at 1.80m as moderate seepage.3.Trial pit terminated at 2.50m due to total collapse of sides.

26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP10

TP10REL00396

0.10

0.60

0.90

1.80

2.00

2.50

D1/J1

D2

D3

D/J

D

D

Loose black sand and gravel with occasionalsubrounded to subangular cobbles of sandstone.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subangularto subrounded ash, clinker, brick, quartzite andsandstone(MADE GROUND)

Loose damp brown silty clayey gravelly sand withoccasional cobbles of sandstone and rare pockets ofash and clinker. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subangular to subrounded sandstone andquartzite(MADE GROUND)

Very loose very wet brown gravelly silty SAND.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subroundedsandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...with running sand present locally between 1.80mto 2.50m


1:20

Sheet 1 of 1

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing below 2.50m.2.Water encountered at 2.50m as slight seepage.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.50m due to collapsing of sidewalls.

26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP11

TP11REL00396

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.70

0.800.800.800.901.00

1.90

2.502.50-3.00

2.60

D1

D2

D3

B1D4

D

D

D

BD

SV 404050

Loose grey sandy gravel to cobble grade limestone,quartzite and concrete(MADE GROUND)

Stiff grey-brown sandy gravelly clay with cobblesof sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Loose brown clayey sandy gravel with occasionalcobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subangular to subrounded brick, ash,clinker and quartzite(MADE GROUND)

Firm grey-brown gravelly silty sandy clay. Gravelis predominantly fine to coarse subangular tosubrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Firm to stiff grey-brown slightly gravelly claywith rare plastic and metal. Gravel is fine tocoarse subangular sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Very loose wet brown very silty fine to mediumgrained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample




26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP11

TP11REL00396

3.50

Very loose wet brown very silty fine to mediumgrained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample




26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP12

TP12REL00396

0.40

0.50

0.80

1.10

1.201.201.201.201.20

D1/J1

D2

D/J

DSV 20

252840

Loose black sandy gravel with cobble of brick andsandstone. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular ash, brick, clinker quartzite andsandstone(MADE GROUND)

Firm grey-brown sandy silty gravelly clay. Gravelis predominantly fine to coarse subangular tosubrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Loose black sandy gravel with cobbles of brick andsandstone. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular ash, brick, clinker quartzite andsandstone(MADE GROUND)

Soft grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY with somecobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample




26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP12

TP12REL00396

3.20

3.30-3.603.30

4.30

B1D3

BD

Soft grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY with somecobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)

Very loose wet silty clayey fine to medium grainedSAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample



1.Trial pit sides stable.2.No water encountered.

26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP13

TP13REL00396

0.20

1.00

1.101.10-1.50

1.101.101.101.10

2.10

D1

B1D2

D3

D

BD

D

SV 30324550

Loose black-brown sandy gravel with frequent cobbleof brick and sandstone. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subangular ash, clinker, brick,concrete and sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Soft to firm grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subangularto subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample




26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP13

TP13REL00396

4.40

Soft to firm grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subangularto subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample




26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP14

TP14REL00396

0.20

0.60

0.70

1.20

1.30

1.50

1.60-2.001.60

D1

D2/J1

D3/J2

B1D4

D

D/J

D/J

BD

Loose grey locally bituminous sandy gravel. Gravelis predominantly fine to coarse subangularlimestone(MADE GROUND)

...becoming cobbly below 0.50m

Stiff brown variable sandy gravelly clay withcobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto medium subangular to subrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)

Loose black sandy gravel with occasional cobble ofsandstone. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular ash, clinker, brick and sandstone(MADE GROUND)...with a length of metal encountered at 1.30m

Soft grey-brown sandy silty gravelly CLAY withfrequent cobble of sandstone. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 1 of 2

LegendDepth

Project No:


Sample

Ref

Sample

Type

Field

TypeTest

FieldTest

Result

Ground-

Water

Remarks:

Project: Client:

Logged:

Date: Approved:


Scale:

Drawing No.


W = Water Sample




26/10/2012

GSGS1201


JCB 3CX

TP14

TP14REL00396

3.80

Soft grey-brown sandy silty gravelly CLAY withfrequent cobble of sandstone. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)


1:20

Sheet 2 of 2

APPENDIX VI

Laboratory Test Results

5 – 7 Hexthorpe Road, Hexthorpe,

Doncaster DN4 0AR

tel: +44 (0)844 815 6641

fax: +44 (0)844 815 6642

e-mail: [email protected]

[email protected]

A copy of the Laboratory Schedule of accredited tests as issued by UKAS is attached to this report. This certificate is

issued in accordance with the accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results

reported herein relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be reproduced in full,

without the prior written approval of the laboratory.

Checked and Approved Signatories:

R Gunson A Watkins M Beastall

(Director) (Director) (Laboratory Manager)

Page 1 of

LABO RATO RY

REPO RT

4043

Contract Number: PSL12/3938

Client’s Reference: Report Date: 27 November 2012

Client Name: Geodyne

The Granary

Church Lane

Thrumpton

Nottingham

NG11 0AX

For the attention of: Gareth Smith

Contract Title: Padiham

Date Received: 7-Nov-12

Date Commenced: 7-Nov-12

Date Completed: 27-Nov-12

Notes: Observations and Interpretations are outside the UKAS Accreditation

* Denotes test not included in laboratory scope of accreditation

$ Denotes test carried out by approved contractor

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL DESCRIPTIONS

Hole Sample Sample Depth Description of Sample

Number Number Type m

TP1 1.00 Brown slightly sandy silty CLAY.

TP12 3.30-3.60 Grey slightly clayey silty SAND.

WS4 2.30-2.80 Brown gravelly sandy CLAY.

WS5 2.80-3.20 Brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY.

WS7 1.50-2.00 Grey gravelly slightly sandy CLAY.

Compiled by Date Checked by Date Approved by Date

26/11/12 27/11/12 27/11/12

Contract No:

Client Ref:PADIHAM.

PSL12/3938

32190

Page of .

SUMMARY OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTS(B.S. 1377 : PART 2 : 1990)

Moisture Bulk Dry Particle Liquid Plastic Plasticity %

Hole Sample Sample Depth Content Density Density Density Limit Limit Index Passing Remarks

Number Number Type m % Mg/m3

Mg/m3

Mg/m3

% % % .425mm

Clause 3.2 Clause 7.2 Clause 7.2 Clause 8. Clause 4.3/4.4 Clause 5. Clause 6.

TP1 1.00 34 62 29 33 100

TP12 3.30-3.60 25 NP

WS4 2.30-2.80 29 46 22 24 87

WS5 2.80-3.20 18 33 14 19 96

WS7 1.50-2.00 13 37 20 17 86

SYMBOLS : NP : Non Plastic * : Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Wet Sieved.


26/11/12 27/11/12 27/11/12

PSL12/3938

32190

Intermediate plasticity CI.

High plasticity CH.

Intermediate plasticity CI.

Low plasticity CL.

PADIHAM.Contract No:

Client Ref:

PSLR002 Issue 1 Jun 06 Page of .

PLASTICITY CHART FOR CASAGRANDE CLASSIFICATION.

(B.S.5930 : 1999)


26/11/12 27/11/12 27/11/12

PSL12/3938

32190PADIHAM.

Contract No:

Client Ref:

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Liquid Limit (LL%).

Pla

sticity In

de

x (

PI%

).

CL CI CH CV CE

ML MI MH MV ME

PSLR002 Issue 1 Jun 06 Page of .

of 10

Units 7 & 8 Sandpits Business Park Mottram Road, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 3AR

FINAL ANALYTICAL TEST REPORT

Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Issue Number: 2 Date: 12 December, 2012

Client: GeoDyne (Nottingham) The Granary Church Lane Thrumpton Nottingham Nottinghamshire UK NG11 0AX

Project Manager: Gareth Smith Project Name: Station Road, Padiham Project Ref: 32190 Order No: 32190/GJS Date Samples Received: 08/11/12 Date Instructions Received: 08/11/12 Date Analysis Completed: 12/12/12

Prepared by: Approved by:

Melanie Marshall Carolyn Field Laboratory Coordinator Client Service Manager

Notes - Soil analysisAll results are reported as dry weight (<40°C). For samples with Matrix Codes 1 - 6 inert stones >10mm are removed or excluded from the sample prior to analysis and reported results corrected to a whole sample basis. For samples with Matrix Code 7 the whole sample is dried and crushed prior to analysis. Notes - GeneralSubscript "A" indicates analysis performed on the sample as received, "D" indicates analysis performed on the dried sample. All analysis is performed on the dried and crushed sample for samples with Matrix Code 7 and this supercedes any "A" subscripts. Superscript "M" indicates method accredited to MCERTS. For complex, multi-compound analysis, quality control results do not always fall within chart limits for every compound and we have criteria for reporting in these situations. If results are in italic font they are associated with such quality control failures and may be unreliable. A deviating samples report is appended and will indicate if samples or tests have been found to be deviating. Any test results affected may not be an accurate record of the concentration at the time of sampling. Predominant Matrix Codes - 1 = SAND, 2 = LOAM, 3 = CLAY, 4 = LOAM/SAND, 5 = SAND/CLAY, 6 = CLAY/LOAM, 7 = OTHER. Samples with Matrix Code 7 are not predominantly a SAND/LOAM/CLAY mix and are not covered by our MCERTS accreditation. Secondary Matrix Codes - A = contains stones, B = contains construction rubble, C = contains visible hydrocarbons, D = contains glass/metal, E = contains roots/twigs. IS indicates Insufficient sample for analysis. NDP indicates No Determination Possible. NAD indicates No Asbestos Detected. Superscript # indicates method accredited to ISO 17025. Analytical results reflect the quality of the sample at the time of analysis only. Opinions and interpretations expressed are outside the scope of our accreditation. Please contact us if you need any further information.

of 10

Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham

Client Project Ref: 32190

Lab Sample ID 12/05194/1 12/05194/2 12/05194/3 12/05194/4 12/05194/5 12/05194/6 12/05194/7 12/05194/8

Client Sample No

Client Sample ID TP3 TP7 TP12 WS4 WS5 WS7 WS8 TP9

Depth to Top 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.20 0.70

Depth To Bottom

Date Sampled 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 26-Oct-12

Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Sample Matrix Code 4AE 4ABE 5AE 4AE 5AE 6ABE 4A 5A

Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

Asbestos in soilD# - - NAD - - - - - A-T-045

pHDM# 9.63 8.50 8.35 8.24 8.20 8.59 7.64 8.11 pH A-T-031s

Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - 0.11 - - - 0.04 0.03 - g/l A-T-026s

Total Organic CarbonDM# 3.63 1.65 20.1 12.6 7.69 5.02 23.9 1.38 % w/w A-T-032s

ArsenicDM# 5 16 25 48 27 22 40 7 mg/kg A-T-024

CadmiumDM# 0.6 1.6 1.9 4.1 2.7 2.1 3.4 2.0 mg/kg A-T-024

CopperDM# 14 20 127 83 62 56 219 29 mg/kg A-T-024

ChromiumD# 11 21 18 20 20 25 20 25 mg/kg A-T-024

Chromium (hexavalent)D <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 mg/kg A-T-040s

Chromium (trivalent) 11 21 18 20 20 25 20 25 mg/kg Calc

LeadDM# 25 35 87 240 152 154 187 24 mg/kg A-T-024

MercuryD 0.28 0.19 <0.17 <0.17 0.24 0.47 1.10 <0.17 mg/kg A-T-024

NickelDM# 9 22 31 32 30 38 48 33 mg/kg A-T-024

SeleniumDM# 1 <1 <1 2 2 <1 2 2 mg/kg A-T-024

ZincDM# 47 98 122 102 104 106 131 83 mg/kg A-T-024

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/1 12/05194/2 12/05194/3 12/05194/4 12/05194/5 12/05194/6 12/05194/7 12/05194/8

Client Sample No


Depth to Top 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.20 0.70

Depth To Bottom




Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

PAH 16

Acenaphthene AM# 1.2 <0.1 0.2 2.7 0.4 <0.1 0.2 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s

Acenaphthylene AM# 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.9 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Anthracene AM# 1.3 <0.1 0.3 2.8 0.3 <0.1 0.6 0.6 mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(a)anthracene AM# 6.7 0.3 1.4 23.7 1.2 <0.1 1.9 0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(a)pyrene AM# 5.4 0.3 1.1 22.5 1.0 <0.1 1.5 0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(b)fluoranthene AM# 7.6 0.4 1.6 29.7 1.3 0.1 1.9 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(ghi)perylene AM# 4.2 0.3 1.1 17.3 0.9 <0.1 1.3 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(k)fluoranthene AM# 1.2 <0.1 0.2 4.6 0.2 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Chrysene AM# 7.4 0.4 1.6 24.8 1.3 <0.1 2.0 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene AM# 1.1 <0.1 0.3 4.0 0.2 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Fluoranthene AM# 13.4 0.7 2.5 42.6 2.6 0.1 3.6 0.3 mg/kg A-T-019s

Fluorene AM# 0.9 <0.1 <0.1 1.5 0.2 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Indeno(123-cd)pyrene AM# 2.9 0.2 0.8 12.2 0.5 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s

Naphthalene AM# 1.0 <0.1 0.2 3.0 0.4 <0.1 0.6 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s

Phenanthrene AM# 9.2 0.5 1.7 17.8 1.5 0.2 3.1 0.5 mg/kg A-T-019s

Pyrene AM# 11.0 0.6 2.2 38.7 2.5 0.2 3.0 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s

Total PAH AM# 74.6 3.6 14.9 249 14.2 1.2 21.3 2.9 mg/kg A-T-019s

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/1 12/05194/2 12/05194/3 12/05194/4 12/05194/5 12/05194/6 12/05194/7 12/05194/8

Client Sample No


Depth to Top 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.20 0.70

Depth To Bottom




Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

TPH CWG

Ali >C5-C6A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C6-C8A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C8-C10A# - - - 0.02 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C10-C12A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C12-C16A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C16-C21A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C21-C35A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Total AliphaticsA# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s

Aro >C5-C7A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C7-C8A# - - - <0.01 - 0.05 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C8-C9A# - - - <0.01 - 0.02 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C9-C10A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C10-C12A# - - - 5.2 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C12-C16A# - - - 16.2 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C16-C21A# - - - 28.6 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C21-C35A# - - - 39.5 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Total AromaticsA# - - - 89.5 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s

TPH (Ali & Aro)A# - - - 89.5 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s

BTEX - BenzeneA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - TolueneA# - - - <0.01 - 0.05 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - Ethyl BenzeneA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - m & p XyleneA# - - - <0.01 - 0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - o XyleneA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

MTBEA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/9 12/05194/10 12/05194/11 12/05194/12 12/05194/13 12/05194/14 12/05194/15 12/05194/16

Client Sample No

Client Sample ID TP11 TP14 WS1 WS7 TP1 TP1 TP1 TP6

Depth to Top 1.00 1.60 2.10 1.10 1.75 2.60 3.00 0.50

Depth To Bottom



Sample Matrix Code 5 5A 5A 5A 1A 7 3A 5

Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

Asbestos in soilD# - - - - - - - - A-T-045

pHDM# 7.09 8.07 7.53 8.49 - - - - pH A-T-031s

Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - - 0.04 - - - - - g/l A-T-026s

Total Organic CarbonDM# 1.69 1.25 0.76 0.86 - - - - % w/w A-T-032s

ArsenicDM# 5 3 5 3 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

CadmiumDM# 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.8 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

CopperDM# 15 20 18 22 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

ChromiumD# 30 27 29 29 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

Chromium (hexavalent)D <1 <1 <1 <1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-040s

Chromium (trivalent) 30 25 26 28 - - - - mg/kg Calc

LeadDM# 33 18 17 16 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

MercuryD <0.17 0.24 <0.17 0.24 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

NickelDM# 18 26 27 27 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

SeleniumDM# 2 <1 2 <1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

ZincDM# 61 64 84 63 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/9 12/05194/10 12/05194/11 12/05194/12 12/05194/13 12/05194/14 12/05194/15 12/05194/16

Client Sample No


Depth to Top 1.00 1.60 2.10 1.10 1.75 2.60 3.00 0.50

Depth To Bottom




Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

PAH 16

Acenaphthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Acenaphthylene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Anthracene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(a)anthracene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.7 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(a)pyrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(b)fluoranthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(ghi)perylene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Benzo(k)fluoranthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Chrysene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.8 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Fluoranthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Fluorene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Indeno(123-cd)pyrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Naphthalene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Phenanthrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Pyrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

Total PAH AM# <0.1 0.3 <0.1 10.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/9 12/05194/10 12/05194/11 12/05194/12 12/05194/13 12/05194/14 12/05194/15 12/05194/16

Client Sample No


Depth to Top 1.00 1.60 2.10 1.10 1.75 2.60 3.00 0.50

Depth To Bottom




Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

TPH CWG

Ali >C5-C6A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C6-C8A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C8-C10A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C10-C12A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C12-C16A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C16-C21A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C21-C35A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Total AliphaticsA# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-022+23s

Aro >C5-C7A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C7-C8A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C8-C9A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C9-C10A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C10-C12A# - - - - <0.1 1.6 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C12-C16A# - - - - <0.1 12.2 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C16-C21A# - - - - <0.1 26.5 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C21-C35A# - - - - <0.1 12.8 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s

Total AromaticsA# - - - - <0.1 53.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-022+23s

TPH (Ali & Aro)A# - - - - <0.1 53.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-022+23s

BTEX - BenzeneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - TolueneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - Ethyl BenzeneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - m & p XyleneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - o XyleneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

MTBEA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/17 12/05194/18 12/05194/19 12/05194/20 12/05194/22 12/05194/23 12/05194/24 12/05194/25

Client Sample No

Client Sample ID TP8 WS2 WS2 WS2 WS5 WS8 TP9 TP10

Depth to Top 1.50 2.10 2.70 3.80 0.50 0.90 0.30 0.10

Depth To Bottom



Sample Matrix Code 5A 5A 5A 7 5A 5

Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

Asbestos in soilD# - - - - - - NAD NAD A-T-045

pHDM# - - - 8.37 - - - - pH A-T-031s

Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - - - 0.03 - - - - g/l A-T-026s

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/17 12/05194/18 12/05194/19 12/05194/20 12/05194/22 12/05194/23 12/05194/24 12/05194/25

Client Sample No

Client Sample ID TP8 WS2 WS2 WS2 WS5 WS8 TP9 TP10

Depth to Top 1.50 2.10 2.70 3.80 0.50 0.90 0.30 0.10

Depth To Bottom



Sample Matrix Code 5A 5A 5A 7 5A 5

Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

TPH CWG

Ali >C5-C6A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C6-C8A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C8-C10A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Ali >C10-C12A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C12-C16A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C16-C21A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Ali >C21-C35A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Total AliphaticsA# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s

Aro >C5-C7A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C7-C8A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C8-C9A# 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C9-C10A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

Aro >C10-C12A# <0.1 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C12-C16A# <0.1 <0.1 3.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C16-C21A# <0.1 <0.1 7.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Aro >C21-C35A# <0.1 <0.1 11.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s

Total AromaticsA# <0.1 <0.1 22.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s

TPH (Ali & Aro)A# <0.1 <0.1 22.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s

BTEX - BenzeneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - TolueneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - Ethyl BenzeneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - m & p XyleneA# 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

BTEX - o XyleneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

MTBEA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s

of 10



Lab Sample ID 12/05194/26 12/05194/27 12/05194/28 12/05194/29 12/05194/30 12/05194/31 12/05194/32 12/05194/33

Client Sample No

Client Sample ID TP11 TP13 TP14 TP12 WS5 WS7 TP9 TP13

Depth to Top 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.20 6.50 2.50 1.70 1.10

Depth To Bottom



Sample Matrix Code 5 5A 5A 5 5A

Un

its

Met

ho

d r

ef

Asbestos in soilD# NAD NAD NAD - - - - - A-T-045

pHDM# - - - 7.58 8.00 8.18 8.54 8.32 pH A-T-031s

Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - - - <0.01 0.01 0.07 0.03 0.17 g/l A-T-026s

APPENDIX VII

Historical Plans

Order Details

Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham

Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):

41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.260

Tel:Fax:Web:

0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk

Page 1 of 1A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012

Lancashire And FurnessPublished 1891Source map scale - 1:500The 1:500 scale Ordnance Survey mapping was introduced in 1855 as a replacement for the 1:528 scale and to compliment the 1:2500 scale that had been implemented in 1853. By 1895, the 1:500 scale covered most towns over a population of about 4000 at the time of survey, although very few towns were mapped more than once at this scale, and none have been since 1910. The 1:500 scale gives particular emphasis to such features as lamp posts, man holes, arched passages and minor building projections. Also oftenfeatured are divisions between tenements, interior ground floor layouts of public buildings, and on earlier plans, the functions of the various parts of larger industrial premises are also indicated. Content of the plans does vary however, from one town to the next in terms of, for example, the completeness of railway tracks and the coverage of public buildings.

Please note: Due to the partial coverage of Historical Town Plans, it is possible that not all segments within an order will contain mapping. Only the segments that have Town Plan coverage will be generated.

Historical Town Plan - Segment A13

Map Name(s) and Date(s)

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Historical Map - Slice A

Ordnance Survey County Series 1:10,560 Ordnance Survey Plan 1:10,000 1:10,000 Raster Mapping

Historical Mapping Legends

Historical Mapping & Photography included:

Lancashire And Furness

Yorkshire


Yorkshire





Ordnance Survey Plan


Burnley




10K Raster Mapping

10K Raster Mapping

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1848

1848

1894 - 1895

1896

1913 - 1914

1929

1932

1938

1955 - 1956

1965

1976

1977 - 1979

1988

1990 - 1991

2006

2012

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Mapping Type Scale Date Pg

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Russian Map - Slice A

1:5,000 and 1:10,000 mapping 1:25,000 mapping

Russian Military Mapping Legends



Yorkshire


Yorkshire







Burnley




10K Raster Mapping

10K Raster Mapping

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,560

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1:10,000

1848

1848

1894 - 1895

1896

1913 - 1914

1929

1932

1938

1955 - 1956

1965

1976

1977 - 1979

1988

1990 - 1991

2006

2012

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18


Key to Numbers on Mapping

SD73SE_Burnley

No. Description

19 Post Office

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1848

Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.



Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Yorkshire

Published 1848




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1894 - 1895




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Yorkshire

Published 1896




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:








Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1929




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1932




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1938




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:








Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1965




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Burnley

Published 1976

Source map scale - 1:10,000These maps were produced by the Russian military during the Cold War between 1950 and 1997, and cover 103 towns and cities throughout the U.K. The maps are produced at 1:25,000, 1:10,000 and 1:5,000 scale, and show detailed land use, with colour-coded areas for development, green areas, andnon-developed areas. Buildings are coloured black and important building uses (such as hospitals, post offices, factories etc.) are numbered, with a numbered key describing their use. They were produced by the Russians for the benefit of navigation, as well as strategic military sites and transport hubs, for use if they were to have invaded the U.K. The detailed information provided indicates that the areas were surveyed using land-based personnel, on the ground, in the cities that are mapped.

Russian Map - Slice A


Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:








Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1988




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:








Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



10k Raster Mapping

Published 2006

Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were produced from the Ordnance Survey`s 1:10,000 colour raster mapping. These maps are derived from Landplan which replaced the old 1:10,000 maps originally published in 1970. The data is highly detailed showing buildings, fences and field boundaries as well as allroads, tracks and paths. Road names are also included together with the relevant road number and classification. Boundary information depiction includes county, unitary authority, district, civil parish and constituency.

dummy



Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



10k Raster Mapping

Published 2012

Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were produced from the Ordnance Survey`s 1:10,000 colour raster mapping. These maps are derived from Landplan which replaced the old 1:10,000 maps originally published in 1970. The data is highly detailed showing buildings, fences and field boundaries as well as allroads, tracks and paths. Road names are also included together with the relevant road number and classification. Boundary information depiction includes county, unitary authority, district, civil parish and constituency.



Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:



Historical Map - Segment A13

Ordnance Survey County Series and

Ordnance Survey Plan 1:2,500

Ordnance Survey Plan, Additional SIMs and

Supply of Unpublished Survey Information

1:2,500 and 1:1,250

Large-Scale National Grid Data 1:2,500 and

1:1,250

Historical Mapping Legends






Additional SIMs




Additional SIMs


Large-Scale National Grid Data


1:2,500

1:2,500

1:2,500

1:1,250

1:1,250

1:2,500

1:1,250

1:2,500

1:2,500

1:1,250

1:1,250

1:1,250

1891 - 1893

1912

1931

1957 - 1965

1958 - 1990

1960

1965 - 1990

1969

1981

1990

1993

1994 - 1995

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13


Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:





Source map scale - 1:2,500The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.



Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1912




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1931




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:








Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:



Additional SIMs


Source map scale - 1:1,250The SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's `Survey of Information on Microfilm') are further, minor editions of mapping which were produced and published in between the main editions as an area was updated. They date from 1947 to 1994, and contain detailed information on buildings, roads and land-use. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.



Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1960




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:








Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1969




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:



Additional SIMs

Published 1981

Source map scale - 1:2,500The SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's `Survey of Information on Microfilm') are further, minor editions of mapping which were produced and published in between the main editions as an area was updated. They date from 1947 to 1994, and contain detailed information on buildings, roads and land-use. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.



Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1990




Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:




Published 1993

Source map scale - 1:1,250'Large Scale National Grid Data' superseded SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's 'Survey of Information on Microfilm') in 1992, and continued to be produced until 1999. These maps were the fore-runners of digital mapping and so provide detailed information on houses and roads, but tend to show less topographic features such as vegetation. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.



Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100

Tel:Fax:Web:





Source map scale - 1:1,250'Large Scale National Grid Data' superseded SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's 'Survey of Information on Microfilm') in 1992, and continued to be produced until 1999. These maps were the fore-runners of digital mapping and so provide detailed information on houses and roads, but tend to show less topographic features such as vegetation. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.



APPENDIX VIII

Landmark Envirocheck Report

Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service

Datasheet

Order Details:

Order Number:

Customer Reference:

National Grid Reference:

Slice:

Site Area (Ha):

Search Buffer (m):

Site Details:

Client Details:

Prepared For:

41967635_1_1

REL00396

379300, 433600

A

2.26

250

Station RoadPadiham

Ms L DanielsGeoDyne LtdThe GranaryChurch LaneThrumptonNG11 0AX

Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited

Report:®Envirocheck


Summary

Agency & Hydrological

Waste

Hazardous Substances

Geological

Industrial Land Use

Sensitive Land Use

Data Currency

Data Suppliers

Useful Contacts

Introduction

Copyright Notice

Natural England Copyright Notice

Ove Arup Copyright Notice

Peter Brett Associates Copyright Notice

Radon Potential dataset Copyright Notice

The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client.

In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.

© Landmark Information Group Limited 2012. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck® Report ("Report") is the property of Landmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency and Natural England, and must not be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions accepted by the Customer. A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the Index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.

Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar, Special Protection Area, Special Conservation Area, Marine Nature Reserve data (derived from Ordnance Survey 1:10000 raster) is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data.

The Data provided in this report was obtained on Licence from Ove Arup & Partners Limited (for further information, contact [email protected]). No reproduction or further use of such Data is to be made without the prior written consent of Ove Arup & Partners Limited. The information and data supplied in the product are derived from publicly available records and other third party sources and neither Ove Arup & Partners nor Landmark warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or data.

The cavity data presented has been extracted from the PBA enhanced version of the original DEFRA national cavity databases. PBA/DEFRA retain the copyright & intellectual property rights in the data. Whilst all reasonable efforts are made to check that the information contained in the cavity databases is accurate we do not warrant that the data is complete or error free. The information is based upon our own researches and those collated from a number of external sources and is continually being augmented and updated by PBA. In no event shall PBA/DEFRA or Landmark be liable for any loss or damage including, without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from the use of this data.

Information supplied from a joint dataset compiled by The British Geological Survey and the Health Protection Agency.

Report Section Page Number

Contents

Report Version v47.0

-

1

13

-

17

20

-

23

28

29


Summary

Data TypePage

NumberOn Site


Waste

0 to 250m

Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices

Discharge Consents

Enforcement and Prohibition Notices

Integrated Pollution Controls

Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control

Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control

Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls

Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements

Nearest Surface Water Feature

Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters

Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes

Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters

Registered Radioactive Substances

River Quality

River Quality Biology Sampling Points

River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points

Substantiated Pollution Incident Register

Water Abstractions

Water Industry Act Referrals

Groundwater Vulnerability

Bedrock Aquifer Designations

Superficial Aquifer Designations

Source Protection Zones

Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences

Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences

Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences

Flood Water Storage Areas

Flood Defences

BGS Recorded Landfill Sites

Historical Landfill Sites

Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites

Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)

Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)

Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites

Registered Landfill Sites

Registered Waste Transfer Sites

Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites

1

1

1

Yes

Yes

Yes

16

2

Yes

28

1

1

1

1

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

Yes

Yes

3

4

1

1

2

1

(*3)

(*up to 500m)

pg 1

pg 4

pg 5

pg 5

pg 10

pg 10

pg 10

pg 10

pg 10

pg 11

pg 11

pg 11

pg 11

pg 11

pg 12

pg 13

pg 13

pg 14

pg 15

pg 15

pg 16


Summary

Data TypePage

NumberOn Site


Geological

Industrial Land Use

0 to 250m

Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)

Explosive Sites

Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)

Planning Hazardous Substance Consents

Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements

BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology

BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry

BGS Recorded Mineral Sites

BGS Urban Soil Chemistry

BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages

Brine Compensation Area

Coal Mining Affected Areas

Mining Instability

Man-Made Mining Cavities

Natural Cavities

Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain

Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards

Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards

Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards

Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas

Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures

Contemporary Trade Directory Entries

Fuel Station Entries

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

n/a

Yes

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes

Yes

Yes

n/a

n/a

29

(*up to 500m)

pg 17

pg 17

pg 18

pg 18

pg 18

pg 19

pg 19

pg 19

pg 19

pg 20


Summary

Data TypePage

NumberOn Site

Sensitive Land Use

0 to 250m

Areas of Adopted Green Belt

Areas of Unadopted Green Belt

Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Environmentally Sensitive Areas

Forest Parks

Local Nature Reserves

Marine Nature Reserves

National Nature Reserves

National Parks

Nitrate Sensitive Areas

Nitrate Vulnerable Zones

Ramsar Sites

Sites of Special Scientific Interest

Special Areas of Conservation

Special Protection Areas

(*up to 500m)

Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 1 of 29


Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

1

2

2

3

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

A13NW(NW)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(N)

89

94

94

178

1

1

1

1

Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:

Positional Accuracy:

Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:



United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyAdjacent To Padiham Leisure Centre Cso, Park Road, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)017190925131st March 20072nd November 2006Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River

River CalderNew Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as

amended by Environment Act 1995)

Located by supplier to within 10m

United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyRear Perseverance Mill Cso, Waterside Mews, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRiver Calder (Wyre)01719082311st March 200810th March 200627th November 2006Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River

Green Brook Trib Of R CalderAuthorisation revokedRevokedLocated by supplier to within 10m

United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyRear Perseverance Mill Cso, Waterside Mews, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002011st January 19951st January 199528th February 2008Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River

River CalderConsent revoked or revised: New Consent issued (Section 37(1))Located by supplier to within 100m

United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyInskip Street, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur002223rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River

River CalderVaried under EPR 2010Located by supplier to within 10m

379120433690

379480433690

379480433690

379390433840



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

3

3

3

4

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13SE(SE)

178

208

208

183

1

1

1

1




Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:

Positional Accuracy:

United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyInskip Street, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002211st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River

River CalderPost National Rivers Authority Legislation where issue date > 31/08/1989Located by supplier to within 100m

United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyStation Road, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur001823rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyStation Road, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR001811st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur0027231st March 200510th December 2004Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River

River CalderModified (Water Resources Act 1991, Schedule 10 as amended by

Environment Act 1995)

Located by supplier to within 10m

379390433840

379370433870

379370433870

379570433450



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

4

4

5

5

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

A13SE(SE)

A13SE(SE)

A13NE(E)

A13NE(E)

197

197

214

214

1

1

1

1





United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur003323rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR003311st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyOpp 76 Burnley Road, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur002123rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyOpp 76 Burnley Road, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002111st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


379580433440

379580433440

379600433720

379600433720



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

6

7

8

8

9

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents

Discharge Consents


A14SW(SE)

A13SW(SW)

A13NW(N)

A13NW(N)

A13NE(NE)

232

245

249

249

0

1

1

1

1

2





Name:Location:Authority:Permit Reference:Dated:Process Type:Description:Status:Positional Accuracy:

United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot Given01BUR002711st January 1995Not Supplied30th March 2005Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River

River CalderConsent revoked or revised: New Consent issued (Section 37(1))Located by supplier to within 10m

Central Electricity Generating Board (Nw Region)Production & Distribution Of ElectricityPadiham B Power Station, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder - Lancs01627A126th March 195826th March 19587th April 1993Trade Discharges - Cooling WaterFreshwater Stream/River

River CalderAuthorisation revokedRevokedLocated by supplier to within 100m

United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyShuttleworth/Calder St, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur002423rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyShuttleworth/Calder St, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002411st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River


Ej Riley LtdRiley House, Station Road, Padiham, BURNLEY, Lancashire, BB12 7ARBurnley Borough Council, Planning and EnvironmentCP 1415th March 1996Local Authority Air Pollution ControlPG6/33 Wood coatingAuthorisation revokedRevokedManually positioned to the address or location

379630433450

379003433400

379260433900

379260433900

379356433639



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

10

10

11

12

13

13








A13SW(SW)

A13SW(SW)

A13NW(W)

A13NW(W)

A13NE(NE)

A13SE(E)

A13NE(E)

92

92

44

0

40

68

70

2

2

-

1

1

1

1



Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:




Skillings Crushing Company LtdThe Yard, Padiham, Bb12 8edBurnley Borough Council, Planning and EnvironmentLAPPC/Mineral 218th July 2008Local Authority Pollution Prevention and ControlPG3/16 Mobile screening and crushing processesPermittedLocated by supplier to within 100m

Skillings Crushing Company LtdThe Yard, Park Road, Padiham, Bb12 8edBurnley Borough Council, Planning and EnvironmentLAPPC/MIneral 125th July 2007Local Authority Pollution Prevention and ControlPG3/16 Mobile screening and crushing processesPermittedLocated by supplier to within 10m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - UnknownRiver Calder15th November 199191330357Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Textile industryGreen Brook , PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Paints / DyesGreen Brook; Trade Effluent12th March 199797330063Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverLeaking Underground PipeCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionAgricultural: CarcassesRiver Calder18th February 199595330040Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Detergents/SurfactantGreen Brook/Sweet4th October 199494330257Calder - LancsNot GivenMiscellaneous/Other Pollution TypeCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

379150433500

379150433500

379105433601

379200433600

379400433700

379500433595

379500433600



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

13

14

15

16

16

16







A13SE(E)

A13SE(SE)

A13SW(SW)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(NE)

73

98

108

114

117

119

1

1

1

1

1

1







Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot GivenGreen Brook; None Pollution Found26th May 199393330148Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Garage PremisesMinisport Limited, Thompson Street, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - Vehicle Washings And De WaxingGreen Bk; Trade Effluent16th May 199797330134Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverOther CauseCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Industrial: OtherBurnley Pallets Limited, Park Road, PENDLEBURYEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubbishRiver Calder; Partially Burnt Pallets16th May 199797330133Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverVandalismCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubble/Litter Or SolidsGreen Bk; Rubbish2nd April 199696330036Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - OtherGreen Brook; Wood Ash22nd December 199494330318Calder - LancsNot GivenMiscellaneous/Other Pollution TypeCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Industrial: OtherRiver Calder At , PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - Waste OilRiver Calder; Waste Oil9th July 199797330162Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverAccidental Spillage/LeakageCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

379505433595

379500433500

379100433500

379500433695

379500433700

379505433695



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

17

18

18

19

20

20







A13NE(NE)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(NE)

A13SE(SE)

A13SE(SE)

139

139

144

178

182

187

1

1

1

1

1

1







Not GivenRiver Calder At , PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubbishRiver Calder; Empty Kegs7th January 199797330003Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionUnknownRiver Calder; No Pollution Found22nd August 199696330202Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - Inert Suspended SolidsRiver Calder5th January 199393330002Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenWaterside Mews, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - UnknownNot Supplied2nd November 1998CE981030Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubble/Litter Or SolidsGreen Bk; Solid Refuse3rd April 199696330072Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot GivenNo Pollution Found; None Pollution Found5th November 199393330307Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

379400433800

379300433795

379300433800

379500433800

379500433400

379500433395



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

21

21

21

22

22

22







A13SE(E)

A13SE(E)

A13SE(E)

A13NE(E)

A13NE(E)

A13NE(E)

183

185

189

202

204

206

1

1

1

1

1

1







Water Company Sewage: Sewage Treatment WorksLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionIndustrial Solid WasteGreen Brook; Drums (Empty)7th January 199393330007Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Detergents/SurfactantGreen Brook/Sweet Cl18th November 199494330295Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Private Sewage (Non-PLC): Sewerage SystemsLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCrude SewageGreen Bk; Sewage10th May 199696330115Calder - LancsNot GivenBlocked SewerCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - Vehicle Washings And De WaxingRiver Calder; Trade Effluent9th July 199696330164Calder - LancsNot GivenWrong ConnectionCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - UnknownRiver Calder11th September 199191330249Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - OtherRiver Calder; Trade Effluent8th July 199696330165Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

379600433500

379600433495

379605433495

379600433695

379600433700

379605433695



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

22

23

23

23

23

23







A13NE(E)

A13SE(SE)

A13SE(SE)

A13SE(SE)

A13SE(SE)

A13SE(SE)

209

239

239

243

243

246

1

1

1

1

1

1







Not GivenRiver Calder, Kwick SaveEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOrganic Wastes: Animal CarcassesRiver Calder; Dead Sheep1st May 199797330125Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Detergents/SurfactantGreen Brook6th April 199393330090Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot GivenNone Pollution Found3rd February 199292330104Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubble/Litter Or SolidsGreen Brook; Drums26th June 199595330146Calder - LancsNot GivenVandalismCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - FoamSweet Clough; Detergent2nd November 199494330279Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - FoamSweet Clough/Green; Detergent11th November 199494330284Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

379605433700

379600433400

379605433405

379605433400

379600433395

379605433395



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

24

25

26

27




River Quality

River Quality


Water Abstractions

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13SE(E)

A13NW(W)

A13SE(SE)

A14SW(SE)

244

172

169

0

15

210

457

1

1

1

1

1

1

1


Location:Prosecution Text:Prosecution Act:Hearing Date:Verdict:Fine:Costs:Positional Accuracy:

Location:Prosecution Text:Prosecution Act:Hearing Date:Verdict:Fine:Cost:Positional Accuracy:

Name:GQA Grade:Reach:Estimated Distance (km):Flow Rate:Flow Type:Year:

Name:GQA Grade:Reach:Estimated Distance (km):Flow Rate:Flow Type:Year:

Authority:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Water Impact:Air Impact:Land Impact:Positional Accuracy:Pollutant:

Operator:Licence Number:Permit Version:Location:Authority:Abstraction:Abstraction Type:Source:Daily Rate (m3):Yearly Rate (m3):Details:Authorised Start:Authorised End:Permit Start Date:Permit End Date:Positional Accuracy:

Domestic & Residential: Private DwellingsStation Road, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionGeneral Biodegradable : Crude SewageNot Supplied28th May 199929233Not GivenNot GivenWrong ConnectionCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m

Station Road, Padiham, Bb12Failure to store and control wasteEpa90 S34(1)(B) & (B)16th December 2004Guilty20002124Manually positioned within the geographical locality

Green Brook, Station Road, Padiham, Bb12Allowing harmful waste (including rayon and rubber) to enter a watercourseWra91 S85(1) & (6)16th December 2004Guilty100002124Manually positioned within the geographical locality

Green BkRiver Quality BQsl At Hapton Colliery To Calder3.6

Flow less than 0.31 cumecsRiver2000

CalderRiver Quality DPendle Water To Padiham Power Station5.7

Flow less than 5 cumecsRiver2000

Environment Agency - North West Region, North Area19th July 2004252102Category 2 - Significant IncidentCategory 4 - No ImpactCategory 4 - No ImpactLocated by supplier to within 10mCrude Sewage

R J Mountfourd-Aram3223Not SuppliedPadiham, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionIndustrial Processing ( Miscellaneous)Not SuppliedBrook38200092444000Additional Purpose - Cooling. Green Brook. Licence RevokedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 100m

379300433900

379312433829

379312433826

379384433592

379138433623

379606433454

379800433300



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

Water Abstractions

Water Abstractions


Drift Deposits








A14SW(SE)

A9NW(SE)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(S)

A13NW(W)

A13NW(NW)

A13NE(E)

A13NE(E)

460

480

0

0

0

0

0

3

7

13

13

1

1

1

1

3

3

3

1

1

1

1



Soil Classification:

Map Sheet:Scale:

Drift Deposit:

Map Sheet:Scale:

Aquifer Desination:

Aquifer Designation:

Aquifer Designation:

Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:




R J Mountford-Aram2671331001Not SuppliedGreen Brook, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionIndustrial Cooling & ManufacturingNot SuppliedSurface1737420250Additional Purposes: Cooling; Manufacturing; Licence Status: RevokedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 100m

Perseverence Mills Ltd26713310191Borehole At PadihamEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOther Industrial/Commercial/Public Services: General Use (Medium Loss)Water may be abstracted from a single pointGroundwaterNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot Supplied01 January31 December16th August 2002Not SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m

Soils of High Leaching Potential (U) - Soil information for restored mineral workings and urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere. A worst case vulnerability classification (H) assumed, until proved otherwiseSheet 10 Central Lancashire1:100,000

Low permeability drift deposits occuring at the surface and overlying Major andMinor Aquifers are head, clay-with-flints, brickearth, peat, river terrace depositsand marine and estuarine alluviumSheet 10 Central Lancashire1:100,000

Secondary Aquifer - A

Secondary Aquifer - A

Unproductive Strata

Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied



Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied

379800433295

379790433250

379299433599

379299433599

379299433599

379293433652

379299433599

379146433598

379251433680

379418433635

379418433635



Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR







Flood Defences

Flood Defences

A13SW(W)

A13NW(NW)

A13SE(E)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(N)

37

39

49

71

123

169

1

1

1

1

1

1





Type:Reference:

Type:Reference:





Flood DefencesNot Supplied

Flood DefencesNot Supplied

None

None

379114433584

379142433678

379482433581

379404433738

379414433788

379386433830


Waste

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

28

29

30

31

32






A13SW(W)

A13SW(SW)

A13SW(SW)

A13SW(W)

A13NE(E)

76

97

178

16

47

1

1

1

1

1

Licence Holder:Location:Name:Operator Location:Boundary Accuracy:Provider Reference:First Input Date:Last Input Date:Specified Waste Type:EA Waste Ref:Regis Ref:WRC Ref:BGS Ref:Other Ref:



Licence Number:Location:Operator Name:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Licence Status:Issued:Last Modified:Expires:Suspended:Revoked:Surrendered:IPPC Reference:Positional Accuracy:


PoloLand off Blackburn Road, Simonstone, Burnley, LancashirePadiham Power StationNot SuppliedAs SuppliedEAHLD07351Not SuppliedNot SuppliedDeposited Waste included Inert, Industrial and Household Waste

Not SuppliedNot Supplied2300/0534Not SuppliedK1/23/034

British Gas PlcBritish Gas Holder Station, Park Road, Padiham, LancashireBritish GasNot SuppliedAs SuppliedEAHLD0699331st December 19878th March 1989Deposited Waste included Inert Waste

Not SuppliedNot Supplied2300/0580Not SuppliedL1/12/322, 100/322, K1/12/082, Licence No 253

Not SuppliedElizabeth Street, Padiham, Burnley, LancashireElizabeth StreetNot SuppliedAs SuppliedEAHLD06990Not SuppliedNot SuppliedDeposited Waste included Unknown Material

Not SuppliedNot Supplied2300/0535Not SuppliedK1/12/035

103970125 Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancs, BB12 7ANTaylor KevinNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaHCI Waste Transfer StationIssued13th June 2012Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m

101694Greenbridge Mill, Station Road, Padiham, Lancashire, BB12 8EFRecycled Parts LtdNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaVehicle depollution facilityIssued6th October 2010Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedManually positioned to the address or location

379079433562

379193433475

379128433415

379146433581

379462433624


Waste

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

33

33

34



Local Authority Landfill Coverage



A13SW(SW)

A13SW(SW)

A13SW(SW)

74

120

0

0

200

1

1

4

11

4



Name:

Name:

Location:Reference:Authority:Last Reported

Status:

Types of Waste:Date of Closure:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:

54198Unit 10, Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EDMr Alf KymeNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaMetal Recycling Sites (Vehicle Dismantlers)Issued23rd May 1995Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m

54115Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANSita Lancashire LtdNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaHousehold Waste Amenity SitesSurrendered14th May 199321st July 2003Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot Supplied20th January 2011Not SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m

Burnley Borough Council - Has supplied landfill data

Lancashire County Council - Had landfill data but passed it to the relevant environment agency

Not SuppliedNot SuppliedBurnley Borough CouncilUnknown

Not SuppliedNot SuppliedPositioned by the supplierModerate

379169433511

379159433465

379299433599

379299433599

379122433391


Waste

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

35

36



A13SW(SW)

A13SW(SW)

137

137

1

1

Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Licence Easting:Licence Northing:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Accuracy:Authorised Waste

Environment Agencymust give specific authorisation for this waste to be acceptedWasterequires prior approval

Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Licence Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:Authorised Waste

Prohibited Waste

British Gas North WesternL 253British Gas Holder Station, Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire379150433450Distribution Dept, Russell Street, BLACKBURN, Lancashire, BB2 3BNEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaLandfillUndefinedSome restriction on source of waste

Licence lapsed/cancelled/defunct/not applicable/surrenderedCancelled1st March 1987Not Given

Not Given

Manually positioned to the address or locationNot ApplicableCementCeramicsGlassNon-Hazardous MetalsSlate,Concrete,BrickSoil,Rock,Clay,Natural SandSolid Fully-Polymerised PlasticsTimberWaste N.O.S

Sita (Lancashire) LtdL 493Padiham H.W.D.C, Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, Bb12 7amTustin Court, Portway, Preston, Lancashire, Pr2 2yqEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaCivic AmenityUndefinedNo known restriction on source of waste

Operational as far as is knownOperational14th May 1993SR 48

Not Given

Manually positioned to the address or locationNot SuppliedCar BatteriesGen.Household/Com/Ind.WasteHousehold ChemicalsMineral OilsClinical Wastes

379150433450

379150433450


Waste

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

36

37



A13SW(SW)

A13SW(SW)

137

99

1

1

Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Licence Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:Authorised Waste

Prohibited Waste

Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Licence Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:Authorised WasteProhibited Waste

Lancs Waste ServicesSR 48Park Road H.W.D.C, Padiham, Burnley, LancashirePO Box 9, Guildhouse, Cross Street, PRESTON, Lancashire, PR1 8RDEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaCivic AmenityUndefinedNo known restriction on source of waste

Record supersededSuperseded1st February 1991Not Given

L 493

Manually positioned to the address or locationNot SuppliedBonded AsbestosGarden WasteGeneral Household + Commercial WasteWaste Mineral Oil From HouseholdersWaste Solvent From HouseholdersAnimal WastesClinical Wastes

A Kyme - A & J Van Breakers LtdL 622A & T Commercials, Park Road, Padiham, BURNLEY, Lancashire, BB12 7ANAs Site AddressEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaScrapyardVery Small (Less than 10,000 tonnes per year)No known restriction on source of waste

Operational as far as is knownOperational23rd May 1995Not Given

Not Given

Manually positioned to the road within the address or locationNot SuppliedScrap VehiclesWaste N.O.S.

379150433450

379130433500


Geological

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR








A13NE(S)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(S)

A13SW(SW)

A13NW(W)

A13SW(SW)

A13NW(W)

0

0

0

37

78

86

96

3

5

5

5

5

5

5

Description:

Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:






Lower Westphalian (mainly Productive Coal Measures)

British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment<15 mg/kg

<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg

British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment15 - 25 mg/kg

<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg


<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg


<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg


<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg


<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg

379299433599

379293433651

379299433599

379138433529

379074433629

379155433497

379083433673


Geological

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR





BGS Measured Urban Soil Chemistry

BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages


Mining Instability





A13NW(W)

A13NE(NE)

A14NW(E)

A13SW(SW)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(N)

A13NW(W)

149

163

236

249

0

0

0

0

78

5

5

5

5

6

-

3

3

3





Description:

Mining Evidence:Source:Boundary Quality:

Hazard Potential:Source:




<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg


<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg


<1.8 mg/kg

60 - 90 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg


<1.8 mg/kg

90 - 120 mg/kg

<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg

In an area which may be affected by coal mining activity. It is recommended that a coal mining report is obtained from the Coal Authority. Contact details are included in the Useful Contacts section of this report.

Inconclusive Coal MiningOve Arup & PartnersAs Supplied

Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service

No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service


No data available

No data available

No Hazard

379000433599

379481433798

379633433706

379000433397

379299433599

379299433599

379299433599

379293433652

379074433628


Geological

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR















A13NE(S)

A13NE(N)

A13NW(W)

A13NE(S)

A13NW(W)

A13SW(W)

A13NW(W)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(S)

A13NW(W)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(S)

A13NE(S)

0

0

78

0

16

72

82

0

0

78

0

0

0

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3












Protection Measure:

Source:

Affected Area:

Source:


ModerateBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service



LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service



LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service




No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensionsBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service

The property is in a lower probability radon area, as less than 1% of homes are above the action levelBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service

No Hazard

379299433599

379293433652

379074433628

379299433599

379140433617

379078433586

379101433676

379293433652

379299433599

379074433628

379299433599

379299433599

379299433599


Industrial Land Use

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

38

38

38

38

38

38

39

39

39

40

40












A13SW(W)

A13SW(W)

A13SW(W)

A13SW(W)

A13SW(W)

A13SW(W)

A13NE(E)

A13NE(E)

A13NE(E)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(NE)

31

43

47

65

65

65

47

47

47

47

47

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:







Name:Location:

Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:




Lws Waste ServicesPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANWaste Disposal ServicesInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Bates Car & CommercialPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANGarage ServicesActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Robert WaltonPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANCommercial Vehicle DealersActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Pendal PalletsPark Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANPallets, Crates & Packing CasesInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address

SitaPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANRecycling CentresInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Burnley PalletsPark Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANPallets, Crates & Packing CasesActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Axle DirectGreenbridge Mill, Station Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFEngine Rebuilding & ReconditioningActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Padiham Property LtdGreenbridge Mill Offices, Station Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFIndustrial ServicesActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

BrencliffeGreen Bridge Mill,Green La, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ADCleaning Materials & EquipmentInactiveManually positioned to the address or location

Mistral2, Carrwood Green, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EGCarpet, Curtain & Upholstery CleanersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

ShipstonStation Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFFurniture Manufacturers - Home & OfficeActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

379138433568

379136433556

379136433552

379125433537

379134433534

379125433537

379462433624

379462433624

379462433624

379348433707

379368433709


Industrial Land Use

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

40

41

42

42

42

43

43

44

45

46

46












A13NE(N)

A13SE(SE)

A13SE(E)

A13SE(E)

A13SE(E)

A13SW(SW)

A13SW(SW)

A13SE(SE)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

82

64

98

98

98

125

155

135

198

208

209

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-








Name:Location:





Peugeot & Citroen BreakersGreenbridge Mill ,Station Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFCar Breakers & DismantlersActiveManually positioned within the geographical locality

Monty TyresThompson St, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7APTyre Repairs & RetreadingActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Richard HaworthFactory, 9a, Green Lane, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7AGTextile ManufacturingActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Stockbridge Mill Co LtdGreen Lane, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7AEClothing & Fabrics - ManufacturersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Thornley & CoGreen Lane, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7AETextile ManufacturingInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Riverstone (Uk) LtdPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANRecycling CentresInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Monmouth Garage LtdPark Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANGarage ServicesActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

A Hollis (Padiham) LtdThompson Street Works, Thompson Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7APCar Body RepairsInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Harry Garlick107-111, Burnley Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8BLElectrical Goods Sales, Manufacturers & WholesalersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

The Worx Body ShopStation Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EBGarage ServicesInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Padiham PalletsStation Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EBPallets, Crates & Packing CasesInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

379335433741

379474433522

379530433594

379530433594

379530433594

379128433474

379115433446

379496433451

379536433794

379377433870

379379433871


Industrial Land Use

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

47

47

47

48

49

50

51








A13NE(NE)

A13NE(NE)

A13NE(NE)

A13NW(N)

A14SW(E)

A13NE(N)

A13NW(NW)

211

234

241

213

242

247

249

-

-

-

-

-

-

-







Name:Location:


F Holdcroft & Co81, Burnley Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8BLElectrical Goods Sales, Manufacturers & WholesalersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Foil & Label18, Sowerby Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8DBPrintersInactiveAutomatically positioned in the proximity of the address

Leedham (Elliott & Elliott) Ltd18, Sowerby Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8DBPrintersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Anderson'S Catering & Bakery EquipmentPark View Works, Park View, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EECatering EquipmentInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Auto-TradeThe Kiosk, Stockbridge Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7HACar Dealers - UsedInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location

Paws & Tail2, Station Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EAPet Foods & Animal FeedsActiveAutomatically positioned to the address

Detail Plastics LtdShuttleworth Mead Buisness Park,Meadway, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7NGPlastic Products - ManufacturersInactiveManually positioned within the geographical locality

379478433853

379491433872

379510433870

379256433863

379657433483

379419433906

378958433762


Data Currency

Agency & Hydrological Version Update Cycle

Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices

Discharge Consents

Enforcement and Prohibition Notices

Integrated Pollution Controls

Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control

Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control


Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements





Registered Radioactive Substances

River Quality

River Quality Biology Sampling Points

River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points


Water Abstractions

Water Industry Act Referrals

July 2012

March 2012

March 2012

November 2011

July 2012

September 2012

October 2008

July 2012

January 2012

June 2012

March 2012

November 2011

January 2012

June 2012

March 2012

November 2011

January 2012

June 2012

March 2012

November 2011

July 2012

January 2000

September 2012

September 2012

July 2012

November 2001

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

Annual Rolling Update




Quarterly

Quarterly

Not Applicable

Quarterly













Quarterly

Not Applicable

Monthly

Monthly

Quarterly

Not Applicable

Annually

Annually

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Hyndburn Borough Council - Environmental Health Department

Burnley Borough Council - Planning and Environment

Ribble Valley Borough Council - Environmental Health Department

Pendle Borough Council - Environmental Health Department

Environment Agency - North West Region
















Ordnance Survey





Environment Agency - Head Office



Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area

Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area




Data Currency

Agency & Hydrological Version Update Cycle


Drift Deposits








Flood Defences

January 2011

January 1999

September 2011

September 2011

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Annually

Annually

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly



British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service









Data Currency

Waste Version Update Cycle

BGS Recorded Landfill Sites


Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites

Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)







June 1996

July 2012

July 2012

October 2008

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

July 2012

May 2000

May 2000

May 2000

May 2000

May 2000

April 2003

May 2000

May 2000

May 2000

May 2000

March 2003

March 2003

March 2003

March 2003

March 2003

March 2003

Not Applicable

Quarterly

Quarterly

Not Applicable

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable









Burnley Borough Council


Lancashire County Council - Waste Management Group






Lancashire County Council - Waste Management Group









Data Currency


Geological

Version

Version

Update Cycle

Update Cycle

Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)

Explosive Sites

Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)

Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements

Planning Hazardous Substance Consents



BGS Recorded Mineral Sites

Brine Compensation Area


Mining Instability










May 2012

June 2012

November 2000

June 2012

March 2012

March 2012

October 2011

September 2011

June 2012

March 2012

March 2012

October 2011

September 2011

August 1996

January 2010

April 2012

August 2011

January 2012

October 2000

February 2011

February 2011

February 2011

February 2011

February 2011

February 2011

February 2011

July 2011

July 2011

Bi-Annually

Bi-Annually

Not Applicable











Not Applicable

Variable

Bi-Annually

Not Applicable

As notified

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Annually

Annually

Annually

Annually

Annually

Annually

As notified

As notified

Health and Safety Executive



Ribble Valley Borough Council

Hyndburn Borough Council - Planning

Pendle Borough Council - Planning

Lancashire County Council

Burnley Borough Council - Planning Services


Hyndburn Borough Council - Planning

Pendle Borough Council - Planning

Lancashire County Council

Burnley Borough Council - Planning Services




Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board

The Coal Authority - Mining Report Service

Ove Arup & Partners











Data Currency

Industrial Land Use

Sensitive Land Use

Version

Version

Update Cycle

Update Cycle


Fuel Station Entries

Areas of Adopted Green Belt

Areas of Unadopted Green Belt

Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty

Environmentally Sensitive Areas

Forest Parks

Local Nature Reserves

Marine Nature Reserves

National Nature Reserves

National Parks

Nitrate Sensitive Areas

Nitrate Vulnerable Zones

Ramsar Sites

Sites of Special Scientific Interest

Special Areas of Conservation

Special Protection Areas

May 2012

May 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

July 2012

February 2012

April 1997

February 2012

August 2012

February 2012

August 2012

February 2012

February 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

August 2012

Quarterly

Quarterly

As notified

As notified

As notified

As notified

As notified

As notified

As notified

As notified

Bi-Annually

Annually

Not Applicable

Bi-Annually

Bi-Annually

Bi-Annually

Bi-Annually

Not Applicable

Annually

Bi-Annually

Bi-Annually

Bi-Annually

Bi-Annually

Thomson Directories

Catalist Ltd - Experian


Hyndburn Borough Council

Pendle Borough Council






Natural England

Natural England

Forestry Commission

Natural England

Natural England

Natural England

Natural England

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)

Natural England

Natural England

Natural England

Natural England


Data Suppliers

Ordnance Survey

Environment Agency

Scottish Environment Protection Agency

The Coal Authority

British Geological Survey

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

Countryside Council for Wales

Scottish Natural Heritage

Natural England

Health Protection Agency

Ove Arup

Peter Brett Associates

Data Supplier Data Supplier Logo

A selection of organisations who provide data within this report


Useful Contacts

Contact Name and Address Contact Details

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

-

-

Environment Agency - National Customer Contact

Centre (NCCC)


British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service


Landmark Information Group Limited

The Coal Authority - Mining Report Service




Natural England

Lancashire County Council - Waste Management

Group

Health Protection Agency - Radon Survey, Centre for

Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards


PO Box 544, Templeborough, Rotherham, S60 1BY

1st Floor, Parker Lane, Burnley, Lancashire, BB11 2DT

British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG

Town Hall, Manchester Road, Burnley, Lancashire, BB11 1JA

5 - 7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY

200 Lichfield Lane, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG18 4RG

Council Offices, Church Walk, Clitheroe, Lancashire, BB7 2RA

Development Services, Eagle Street, Accrington, Lancashire, BB5 1LN

Town Hall, Market Street, Nelson, Lancashire, BB9 7PG

Northminster House, Northminster Road, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE1 1UA

Environment Directorate, Guild House, Cross Street, Preston, Lancashire,PR1 8RD

Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ

The Smith Centre, Henley On Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 6AB

Telephone: 08708 506 506Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 01282 425011Fax: 01282 779012Website: www.burnley.gov.uk

Telephone: 0115 936 3143Fax: 0115 936 3276Email: [email protected]: www.bgs.ac.uk

Telephone: 01282 425011Fax: 01282 414799Website: www.burnley.gov.uk

Telephone: 01392 441761Fax: 01392 441709Email: [email protected]: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk

Telephone: 0845 7626848Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 01200 425111Fax: 01200 414488Website: www.ribblevalley.gov.uk

Telephone: 01254 388111Fax: 01254 391625Website: www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk

Telephone: 01282 661661Fax: 01282 691552Website: www.pendle.gov.uk

Telephone: 0845 600 3078Fax: 01733 455103Email: [email protected]: www.naturalengland.org.uk

Website: www.lancashire.gov.uk

Telephone: 01235 822622Fax: 01235 833891Email: [email protected]: www.hpa.org.uk

Telephone: 0844 844 9952Fax: 0844 844 9951Email: [email protected]: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk

Please note that the Environment Agency / SEPA have a charging policy in place for enquiries.

Order Details


Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):

41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26

Tel:

Fax:

Web:

0844 844 9952

0844 844 9951

www.envirocheck.co.uk


Site Sensitivity Map - Segment A13

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Site Sensitivity Map - Slice A

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Flood Map - Slice A

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A


Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Bedrock Aquifer Designation

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Superficial Aquifer Designation

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:





Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:




Sensitive Land Uses


BGS Boreholes

Datasheet

Order Details:

Order Number:

Customer Reference:

National Grid Reference:

Slice:

Site Area (Ha):

Borehole Search Buffer (m):

Site Details:

Client Details:

Prepared For:

41967635_1_1

REL00396

379300, 433600

A

2.26

250

Station RoadPadiham

Ms L DanielsGeoDyne LtdThe GranaryChurch LaneThrumptonNG11 0AX


Report:®Envirocheck


BGS Boreholes Summary

Data TypePage

NumberOn Site 0 to 250m

BGS Boreholes None 9pg 1

Introduction

Copyright Notice

The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client.

In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.

© Landmark Information Group Limited 2012. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck® Report ("Report") is the property ofLandmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency and Natural England, and must not be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions accepted by the Customer. A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.

A copy of the BGS Borehole Ordering Form is available to download from the Support section of www.envirocheck.co.uk.

Report Version v47.0


BGS Boreholes Detail

Map

IDDetails

Quadrant

Reference

(Compass

Direction)

Estimated

Distance

From Site

Contact NGR

52

53

53

53

54

54

54

54

54

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

BGS Boreholes

A13NW(NW)

A13NW(NW)

A13NW(NW)

A13NW(NW)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

A13NE(N)

57

64

80

90

150

171

171

171

171

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:









Sd73se18911.43Padiham Swimming Baths 2




Sd73se3629.75Padiham A.T.E.No.2

Sd73se4/A9.33Padiham Atc 1

Sd73se4/B9.75Padiham Atc 2

Sd73se4/C9.33Padiham Atc 3

Sd73se4/D9.14Padiham Atc 4

379199433685

379232433704

379188433706

379219433727

379350433810

379330433830

379330433830

379330433830

379330433830


Data Currency and Contact Details

BGS Boreholes Version Update Cycle

BGS Boreholes

July 2012 QuarterlyBritish Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service

Contact Details Contact Logo

3

-

British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service


British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG

The Smith Centre, Henley On Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 6AB

Telephone: 0115 936 3143Fax: 0115 936 3276Email: [email protected]: www.bgs.ac.uk

Telephone: 0844 844 9952Fax: 0844 844 9951Email: [email protected]: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Borehole Map - Slice A

For Borehole information please refer to the Borehole datasheet which accompanied this slice.

A copy of the BGS Borehole Ordering Form is available to download from the Support section of www.envirocheck.co.uk.

Order Details


Order Details:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):

41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Estimated Soil Chemistry Arsenic - Slice A

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Estimated Soil Chemistry Cadmium - Slice A

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Estimated Soil Chemistry Chromium - Slice A

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Estimated Soil Chemistry Lead - Slice A

Order Details



41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250

Tel:Fax:Web:



Estimated Soil Chemistry Nickel - Slice A

APPENDIX IX

Coal Authority Mining Report

APPENDIX X

Ground Gas and Water Monitoring Results

Project No.

Client

Site Location

Date

Weather

Atmospheric Pressure (mb)

Equipment

Operator

Borehole No. Peak Methane Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Gas Flow Depth to Time to steady Other Issues i.e. odour, condition of installation, etc

Steady (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (l/h) Groundwater (mbgl) reading (secs)

Peak 0.0 0.2 20.7 0.0

Steady 0.0 0.2 20.7 0.0

Peak 0.0 5.4 12.8 0.0

Steady 0.0 5.4 12.8 0.0

Peak 0.0 2.0 16.1 0.0

Steady 0.0 2.0 16.1 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.3 19.8 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.3 19.8 0.0

Peak 0.0 2.4 19.3 0.0

Steady 0.0 2.4 19.3 0.0

Ambient 0.0 0.0 21.1 NA NA NA

Notes

Cell is highlighted in the following conditions

1. Where Methane exceeds 1% v/v (after BR212)

2. Where Carbon Dioxide exceeds 5% v/v (after BR212)

NA - Not Applicable/ Not Available

BOH - Bottom of Hole

ND - Not Determined

NGW - No groundwater encountered

Monitored for 120 seconds

Monitored for 120 secondsWS8 0.53 90


WS7 2.08 30 Monitored for 180 seconds

971

GA2000+ (GEO 09=Derby) & Dipmeter

JPH

0.99

MONITORING OF SOIL GASES AND GROUNDWATER - IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIRIA C665

Monitored for 120 secondsWS2

WS5 2.34 40

20

WS4 1.70 60

REL00396

Padiham

31/10/2012

Sunny


Visit 1 - 31.10.2012

Project No.

Client

Site Location

Date

Weather


Equipment

Operator



Peak 0.0 0.1 20.8 0.0

Steady 0.0 0.1 20.8 0.0

Peak 0.0 5.8 13.9 0.0

Steady 0.0 5.8 13.9 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.6 18.0 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.6 18.0 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.0 20.1 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.0 20.1 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.5 19.9 0.0

Steady 0.0 0.7 20.4 0.0


Notes






ND - Not Determined


REL00396

Padiham

05/11/2012

Sunny


20

996


RN

0.92






WS5 1.68 40


Visit 2 - 5.11.2012

Project No.

Client

Site Location

Date

Weather


Equipment

Operator



Peak 0.0 0.1 20.4 0.0

Steady 0.0 0.1 20.4 0.0

Peak 0.0 5.2 14.2 0.0

Steady 0.0 5.2 14.2 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.7 18.0 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.7 18.0 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.0 19.8 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.0 19.8 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.6 19.2 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.4 19.5 0.0


Notes






ND - Not Determined






1000


RN

1.11



WS5 1.69 40

20

WS4 1.74 100

REL00396

Padiham

12/11/2012

Overcast and Rain


Visit 3 - 12.11.2012

Project No.

Client

Site Location

Date

Weather


Equipment

Operator



Peak 0.0 0.1 20.1 0.0

Steady 0.0 0.1 20.2 0.0

Peak 0.0 5.1 14.7 0.0

Steady 0.0 5.1 14.7 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.9 17.5 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.9 17.5 0.0

Peak 0.0 0.9 20.2 0.0

Steady 0.0 0.9 20.2 0.0

Peak 0.0 1.3 19.4 0.0

Steady 0.0 1.3 19.4 0.0


Notes






ND - Not Determined


WS5

995


RN


REL00396

Padiham

21/11/2012

Cloudy


35

WS4 1.56 65

0.87


40 Monitored for 180 seconds




WS7 1.86

1.55 45

Visit 4 - 21.11.2012

APPENDIX XI

Statistical Assessment

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Arsenic Deg of Freedom t

SAC 32 mg/kg

Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314

TP3 0.50 5 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 16 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 25 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 48 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 27 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 22 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 40 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699

Arithmetic Mean x 26.14 Minimum 5Standard Deviation s 14.4 Maximum 48number (N) 7

n 3

Representative t value 1.943

Upper 95th

%ile on the mean 36.7

Mean Test 1.15

Comment/Decision

Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test

Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or

greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL

CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA

Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd


REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Arsenic Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)

SAC 32 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 5 4 1.462

TP7 0.50 16 5 1.671

TP12 0.40 25 6 1.822

WS4 0.70 48 7 1.938

WS5 0.80 27 8 2.032

WS7 0.70 22 9 2.11

WS8 0.20 40 10 2.176

11 2.234

12 2.285

13 2.331

14 2.372

15 2.409

16 2.443

17 2.475

18 2.504

19 2.531

20 2.557

21 2.58

22 2.603

23 2.624

24 2.644

25 2.663

26 2.681

27 2.698

28 2.714

29 2.73

30 2.745

Arithmetic Mean x 26.14

Standard Deviation s 14.4

Minimum 5

Maximum Value Xn 48

Number N 7

Critical Value Tcrit 1.938

Calculate Tn 1.521

Comment/Decision There are no outliers in the dataset

CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION



REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Cadmium Deg of Freedom t

SAC 10 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 0.6 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 1.6 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1.9 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 4.1 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 2.7 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 2.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 3.4 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699

Arithmetic Mean x 2.34 Minimum 0.6Standard Deviation s 1.2 Maximum 4.1number (N) 7

n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.32

Comment/Decision

Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test

Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the

Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS

06/12/2012

Made Ground




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Chromium Deg of Freedom t

SAC 3000 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 11 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 21 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 18 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 20 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 20 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 25 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 20 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision







REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Lead n t

SAC 450 mg/kg

2 6.314

TP3 0.50 25 3 2.92

TP7 0.50 35 4 2.353

TP12 0.40 87 5 2.132

WS4 0.70 240 6 2.015

WS5 0.80 152 7 1.943

WS7 0.70 154 8 1.895

WS8 0.20 187 9 1.86

10 1.833

11 1.812

12 1.796

13 1.782

14 1.771

15 1.761

16 1.753

17 1.746

18 1.74

19 1.734

20 1.729

21 1.725

22 1.721

23 1.717

24 1.714

25 1.711

26 1.708

27 1.706

28 1.703

29 1.701

30 1.699


n2.6

Representative t value Not Applicable

Geometric Mean (See SGV10 pg14) 96.9

Mean Test 0.22


CLEA Mean Value Test - Geometric Mean Model (Lead)





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Nickel Deg of Freedom t

SAC 130 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 9 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 22 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 31 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 32 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 30 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 38 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 48 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.30

Comment/Decision







REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Mercury (inorganic) Deg of Freedom t

SAC 170 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 0.28 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.19 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.17 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 0.17 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.24 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.47 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 1.10 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Copper Deg of Freedom t

SAC 2330 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 14 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 20 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 127 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 83 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 62 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 56 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 219 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.06

Comment/Decision


Made Ground






REL00396

06/12/2012

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Selenium Deg of Freedom t

SAC 350 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 1 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 1 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 2 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 2 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 2 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Zinc Deg of Freedom t

SAC 3750 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 47 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 98 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 122 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 102 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 104 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 106 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 131 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.03

Comment/Decision







REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Acenaphthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 210 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 1.2 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.2 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 2.7 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.4 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 0.2 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Made Ground




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Fluorene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 160 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 0.9 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.1 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 1.5 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.2 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 0.2 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Made Ground




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Phenanthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 92 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 9.2 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.5 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1.7 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 17.8 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 1.5 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.2 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 3.1 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.10

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Anthracene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 2300 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 1.3 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.3 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 2.8 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.3 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 0.6 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 260 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 13.4 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.7 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 2.5 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 42.6 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 2.6 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 3.6 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.08

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Pyrene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 560 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 11.0 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.6 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 2.2 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 38.7 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 2.5 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.2 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 3.0 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.03

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(a)anthracene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 3.1 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 6.7 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.3 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1.4 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 23.7 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 1.2 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 1.9 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 3.65

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(a)anthracene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)

SAC 3.1 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 6.7 4 1.462

TP7 0.50 0.3 5 1.671

TP12 0.40 1.4 6 1.822

WS4 0.70 23.7 7 1.938

WS5 0.80 1.2 8 2.032

WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11

WS8 0.20 1.9 10 2.176

11 2.234

12 2.285

13 2.331

14 2.372

15 2.409

16 2.443

17 2.475

18 2.504

19 2.531

20 2.557

21 2.58

22 2.603

23 2.624

24 2.644

25 2.663

26 2.681

27 2.698

28 2.714

29 2.73

30 2.745



Minimum 0.1

Maximum Value Xn 23.7

Number N 7


Calculate Tn 2.189

Comment/Decision


REL00396



06/12/2012

Made Ground

The maximum value in the dataset is an outlier

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Chrysene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 6.0 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 7.4 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.4 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1.6 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 24.8 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 1.3 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 2.0 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 1.99

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Chrysene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)

SAC 6 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 7.4 4 1.462

TP7 0.50 0.4 5 1.671

TP12 0.40 1.6 6 1.822

WS4 0.70 24.8 7 1.938

WS5 0.80 1.3 8 2.032

WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11

WS8 0.20 2.0 10 2.176

11 2.234

12 2.285

13 2.331

14 2.372

15 2.409

16 2.443

17 2.475

18 2.504

19 2.531

20 2.557

21 2.58

22 2.603

23 2.624

24 2.644

25 2.663

26 2.681

27 2.698

28 2.714

29 2.73

30 2.745



Minimum 0.1


Number N 7


Calculate Tn 2.181

Comment/Decision


REL00396



06/12/2012

Made Ground


Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 5.6 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 8.8 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.5 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1.8 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 34.3 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 1.5 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.2 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 2.1 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 2.88

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)

SAC 5.6 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 8.8 4 1.462

TP7 0.50 0.5 5 1.671

TP12 0.40 1.8 6 1.822

WS4 0.70 34.3 7 1.938

WS5 0.80 1.5 8 2.032

WS7 0.70 0.2 9 2.11

WS8 0.20 2.1 10 2.176

11 2.234

12 2.285

13 2.331

14 2.372

15 2.409

16 2.443

17 2.475

18 2.504

19 2.531

20 2.557

21 2.58

22 2.603

23 2.624

24 2.644

25 2.663

26 2.681

27 2.698

28 2.714

29 2.73

30 2.745



Minimum 0.2


Number N 7


Calculate Tn 2.204

Comment/Decision


REL00396



06/12/2012

Made Ground


Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(a)pyrene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 0.83 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 5.4 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.3 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1.1 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 22.5 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 1.0 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 1.5 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 12.67

Comment/Decision


06/12/2012

Made Ground






REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(a)pyrene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)

SAC 0.83 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 5.4 4 1.462

TP7 0.50 0.3 5 1.671

TP12 0.40 1.1 6 1.822

WS4 0.70 22.5 7 1.938

WS5 0.80 1.0 8 2.032

WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11

WS8 0.20 1.5 10 2.176

11 2.234

12 2.285

13 2.331

14 2.372

15 2.409

16 2.443

17 2.475

18 2.504

19 2.531

20 2.557

21 2.58

22 2.603

23 2.624

24 2.644

25 2.663

26 2.681

27 2.698

28 2.714

29 2.73

30 2.745



Minimum 0.1


Number N 7


Calculate Tn 2.213

Comment/Decision

REL00396

06/12/2012



Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Indeno(123-cd)pyrene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 3.2 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 2.9 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.2 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.8 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 12.2 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.5 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 0.8 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 1.79

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Indeno(123-cd)pyrene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)

SAC 3.2 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 2.9 4 1.462

TP7 0.50 0.2 5 1.671

TP12 0.40 0.8 6 1.822

WS4 0.70 12.2 7 1.938

WS5 0.80 0.5 8 2.032

WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11

WS8 0.20 0.8 10 2.176

11 2.234

12 2.285

13 2.331

14 2.372

15 2.409

16 2.443

17 2.475

18 2.504

19 2.531

20 2.557

21 2.58

22 2.603

23 2.624

24 2.644

25 2.663

26 2.681

27 2.698

28 2.714

29 2.73

30 2.745



Minimum 0.1


Number N 7


Calculate Tn 2.215

Comment/Decision


REL00396



06/12/2012

Made Ground


Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 0.76 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 1.1 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.3 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 4.0 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.2 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 0.3 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 2.52

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)

SAC 0.76 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 1.1 4 1.462

TP7 0.50 0.1 5 1.671

TP12 0.40 0.3 6 1.822

WS4 0.70 4.0 7 1.938

WS5 0.80 0.2 8 2.032

WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11

WS8 0.20 0.3 10 2.176

11 2.234

12 2.285

13 2.331

14 2.372

15 2.409

16 2.443

17 2.475

18 2.504

19 2.531

20 2.557

21 2.58

22 2.603

23 2.624

24 2.644

25 2.663

26 2.681

27 2.698

28 2.714

29 2.73

30 2.745



Minimum 0.1

Maximum Value Xn 4

Number N 7


Calculate Tn 2.200

Comment/Decision


REL00396



06/12/2012

Made Ground


Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(ghi)perylene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 44 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 4.2 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.3 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 1.1 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 17.3 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.9 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 1.3 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.19

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Made Ground



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Acenaphthylene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 170 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 0.1 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.1 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 0.9 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.1 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 0.1 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Made Ground




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Naphthalene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 1.5 mg/kg


TP3 0.50 1.0 2 2.92

TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353

TP12 0.40 0.2 4 2.132

WS4 0.70 3.0 5 2.015

WS5 0.80 0.4 6 1.943

WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895

WS8 0.20 0.6 8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 3


Upper 95th


Mean Test 1.02

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Made Ground




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Arsenic Deg of Freedom t

SAC 32 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 7 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 5 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 3 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 5 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 4 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.19

Comment/Decision







REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Cadmium Deg of Freedom t

SAC 10 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 2.0 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 1.6 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 1.4 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 1.5 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 1.7 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699

Arithmetic Mean x 1.64 Minimum 1.4Standard Deviation s 0.2 Maximum 2number (N) 5

n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.19

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Natural Strata




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Chromium Deg of Freedom t

SAC 3000 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 25 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 30 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 25 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 26 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 28 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision







REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Lead n t

SAC 450 mg/kg

2 6.314

TP9 0.70 24 3 2.92

TP11 1.00 33 4 2.353

TP14 1.60 16 5 2.132

WS1 2.10 16 6 2.015

WS7 1.10 16 7 1.943

8 1.895

9 1.86

10 1.833

11 1.812

12 1.796

13 1.782

14 1.771

15 1.761

16 1.753

17 1.746

18 1.74

19 1.734

20 1.729

21 1.725

22 1.721

23 1.717

24 1.714

25 1.711

26 1.708

27 1.706

28 1.703

29 1.701

30 1.699


n2.2

Representative t value Not Applicable

Geometric Mean (See SGV10 pg14) 20.1

Mean Test 0.04


CLEA Mean Value Test - Geometric Mean Model (Lead)





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Nickel Deg of Freedom t

SAC 130 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 33 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 18 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 26 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 27 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 27 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.24

Comment/Decision







REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Mercury (inorganic) Deg of Freedom t

SAC 170 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.17 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.17 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.17 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.17 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.20 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Copper Deg of Freedom t

SAC 2330 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 29 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 15 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 19 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 18 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 21 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision


Natural Strata






REL00396

06/12/2012

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Selenium Deg of Freedom t

SAC 350 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 2 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 2 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 2 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 1 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Natural Strata




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Zinc Deg of Freedom t

SAC 3750 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 83 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 61 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 63 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 83 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 96 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.02

Comment/Decision







REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Acenaphthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 210 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.5 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Natural Strata




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Fluorene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 160 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.4 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Natural Strata




REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Phenanthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 92 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.5 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 2.5 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.02

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Anthracene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 2300 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.6 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.3 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 260 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.3 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 1.4 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Pyrene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 560 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 1.4 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.00

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Chrysene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 6.0 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.8 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.09

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 5.6 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.3 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.2 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.2 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.2 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.7 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.09

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(a)pyrene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 0.83 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.5 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.42

Comment/Decision


06/12/2012

Natural Strata






REL00396

Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Indeno(123-cd)pyrene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 3.2 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.2 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.05

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Benzo(ghi)perylene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 44 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.4 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.01

Comment/Decision





REL00396

06/12/2012

Natural Strata



Client

Site

Our Ref

Date

Soil Type

Determinant Naphthalene Deg of Freedom t

SAC 1.5 mg/kg


TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92

TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353

TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132

WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015

WS7 1.10 0.6 6 1.943

7 1.895

8 1.86

9 1.833

10 1.812

11 1.796

12 1.782

13 1.771

14 1.761

15 1.753

16 1.746

17 1.74

18 1.734

19 1.729

20 1.725

21 1.721

22 1.717

23 1.714

24 1.711

25 1.708

26 1.706

27 1.703

28 1.701

29 1.699


n 2


Upper 95th


Mean Test 0.28

Comment/Decision




06/12/2012

Natural Strata




REL00396

APPENDIX XII

Plates

Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked

Approved Project Scale NTS

Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP1

Plate No. 1

Rev.Station Road, Padiham

TRIAL PIT TP1

TRIAL PIT TP1 ARISINGS TRIAL PIT TP1 ARISINGS

TRIAL PIT TP1




Plate No. 2

Station Road, Padiham Rev.

TRIAL PIT TP2

TRIAL PIT TP2 ARISINGS




Plate No. 3


TRIAL PIT TP3





Plate No. 4


TRIAL PIT TP4





Plate No. 5


TRIAL PIT TP5





Plate No. 6


TRIAL PIT TP6

TRIAL PIT TP6 SIDEWALLS COLLAPSING




Plate No. 7


TRIAL PIT TP7 - WATER ENCOUNTERED AT 2.60M

TRIAL PIT TP7 ARISINGS WITH CERAMIC, COAL , WOOD AND BLACK SILT




Plate No. 8


TRIAL PIT TP8




Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Arisings of Trial Pit TP9 & TP10

Plate No. 9






Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP11 & TP12

Plate No. 10


TRIAL PIT TP11

TRIAL PIT TP12



Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP13 & TP14

Plate No. 11


TRIAL PIT TP13

TRIAL PIT TP14



Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Views of Arisings from WS1 & WS2

Plate No. 12


BOREHOLE WS1

BOREHOLE WS2

1.00m

2.00m

3.00m

1.00m

2.00m

3.00m

4.00m

Loose very silty SAND

Poor recovery between 1.00m to 2.00m




Plate No. 13


BOREHOLE WS3

1.00m

Sandy gravel

Sandstone cobbles

BOREHOLE WS4

1.00m

2.00m

Sandy clayey topsoil Ashy sand

Gravelly sandy CLAY




Plate No. 14


BOREHOLE WS7

BOREHOLE WS5

1.00m

3.00m

2.00m

5.00m

6.00m

4.00m

1.00m

4.00m

3.00m

2.00m

6.00m

5.00m

7.00m

Clayey silty sandy PEAT

Gravelly very sandy silty CLAYSandy gravelly

clayey SILT

Gravelly sandy very silty CLAY

Sandy gravelly clay

Sandy gravel with macadam



Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Views of Arisings from WS8

Plate No. 15


1.00m

4.00m

3.00m

2.00m

5.00m

Sandstone gravel

Gravelly sandy silty CLAY

Black sandy gravel

BOREHOLE WS8

Silty sandy gravelly clay

30% recovery between 1.00m to 2.00m

View from west of site looking south (off site) at retaining wall



Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Site Views

Plate No. 16


View from along the line of the former railway (off site) looking

View of leisure centre looking northeast from footpath to the north of the site




Plate No. 17


View from of the embankment present to the north of the site looking east

View of the embankment present on the south of the site




Plate No. 18


View of the retaining wall from the former railway line to the east of the site

View from the northeast corner of the site looking southwest




Plate No. 19


View of the west of the site looking east

APPENDIX XII

Conditions and Limitations

Conditions & Limitations

Phase I Desk Studies

1. Works undertaken to provide the basis of the Phase I Desk Study report comprise a review of information available from a number

of sources/parties (potentially also including the Client) together with a walk over of the site (where applicable and included within

the quotation). The opinions given in the Phase I Desk Study are based on the information available from third parties/sources that

has been obtained within the available timeframe. Jackson Purdue Lever assumes all third party information to be true and correct

and therefore cannot accept liability for the accuracy of such information supplied.

2. Should additional information become available that may affect the comments and opinions made within the Phase I Desk Study,

Jackson Purdue Lever reserves the right to review such information and make modifications to comments/opinions as appropriate.

3. It should be borne in mind that a Phase I Desk Study collates available information to generate a conceptual model of the site. The

actual geotechnical and environmental considerations can only be fully quantified by intrusive investigation works to confirm the

accuracy of the conceptual site model.

Phase II Intrusive Investigations

1. Our quotation assumes that access to the site will be arranged by others at no cost to ourselves.

2. We have assumed that free access is available throughout to the entire site and that works can be undertaken during a single

mobilisation. Where restricted access is encountered, or where additional unscheduled mobilisations are required, additional costs

may be incurred to the client.

3. We have assumed that all available information relating to buried services will be supplied by the Client at no cost to ourselves. No

responsibility will be accepted for damage to underground services that have not been brought to our prior attention by the Client.

4. All excavations/boreholes will be backfilled with compacted arisings upon completion, with any excess arisings left proud of ground

levels. Excess arisings will not be removed from the site unless specifically requested by the Client. Where we are requested to

remove excess arisings, all associated costs will be passed to the Client.

5. We will attempt to leave the site in a clean and tidy state, however, it must be understood that some disturbance of the site is

unavoidable during intrusive works.

6. Exploratory holes are positioned approximately on site by Jackson Purdue Lever. Should the client require precise locations of all

exploratory points, additional fees will be incurred. It must be borne in mind that backfilled trial pits can create ‘soft spots’,

therefore, should the Client wish to designate ‘no dig’ zones, for example under the footprint of proposed structures, these must be

brought to our attention prior to commencement of works.

7. Groundwater observations relate to conditions encountered at the time of investigation. It must be understood that groundwater

levels may vary as a result of recent climatic conditions or seasonal variation.

8. Trial pits and boreholes examine only a small proportion of the total site area. No liability can be accepted for conditions not

revealed in exploratory holes, particularly between positions. All extrapolations of available data are given in good faith.

Payment

1. Payment terms are strictly 28 days from the invoice date.

2. Prior to commencement of works, we require receipt of formal written instruction from the party accepting full financial

responsibility for the work. In the absence of such an instruction, we would expect the instructing Consulting Engineers/Architects

to accept full financial responsibility for the works.

3. Receipt of instruction to commence work shall be taken as acceptance and compliance of the foregoing conditions.

Liability

1. No individual liability shall be implied to, or accepted by, any employee for works undertaken for and on the behalf of Jackson

Purdue Lever.

combined phase i desk study and phase ii … floor slab should ... cast in situ floor slab...

Documents