colgate hbs case study

18
Colgate Precision

Upload: samarth-gupta

Post on 12-Apr-2017

124 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Colgate hbs case study

Colgate Precision

samarth gupta
Page 2: Colgate hbs case study

Concerned Authorities

Susan Stienberg ( Precision Product Manager )

Nigel Burton ( Division General Manager )

John Phillips ( Colgate Plus Product Manager )

Page 3: Colgate hbs case study

Problems to be TackledPositioning, Branding and Communication Strategy for Precision (Colgate's new toothbrush line)

Avoiding Cannibalism of Colgate Plus

Allocation of Advertisement and Promotion Budget

Page 4: Colgate hbs case study

Colgate’s Current Position (1991)Toothbrushes Contribute 19% of CP’s U.S. Oral Health Care sales and profits.CP holds No. 1 Position is U.S. retail toothbrush market with 23% volume share.Total Market Sale of CP’s toothbrushes = $77 million.Net Profit form this sale =$9.8 million.

Page 5: Colgate hbs case study

Market Share of Different Category of ToothbrushesCATEGORY Avg. Price ($) Volume Sale Dollar Sale

Super-Premium Brushes

$2.6 35% 46%

Professional Brushes

$1.9 41% 42%

Value Brushes $1.29 24% 12%

Page 6: Colgate hbs case study

Colgate Precision was going to be priced in Super-Premium category

It could be priced as a niche product or a main-stream product alongside its counter part Colgate Plus.

There were different Pros and Cons in both the category and Susan had to decide which category should she position Precision.

Page 7: Colgate hbs case study

As a Main-Stream ProductChances of Cannibalizing Colgate Plus ( mainstream toothbrush of colgate)Retail Unit Volume Sale in first two years = 70.9 MMManufacturer Per Unit Cost = $ 0.64Manufacture Per Unit Price = $ 1.76No. of SKU’s Introduced = 7Chances of not fulfilling the product demand.Colgate will have to drop some slow moving SKU’s to create space for precision.

Page 8: Colgate hbs case study

As a Niche ProductMain competitor Oral B’s Indicator Brush (well established).Retail Unit Volume Sale in first two years = 23 MMManufacturer Per Unit Cost = $ 0.66Manufacture Per Unit Price = $ 2.02No. of SKU’s Introduced = 4Can be accommodated without dropping any SKU.Demand can be satisfied with current production capacity.

Page 9: Colgate hbs case study

Profits Niche vs Main-streamNiche’s Unit Sold = 23 MMNiche’s Per Unit Margin = $ 1.36Niche’s Profit = $ 31.28 million

Mainstream’s Unit Sold = 70.9 MMMainstream’s Per Unit Margin = $ 0.72Mainstream’s Profit = $ 51.28 million

Page 10: Colgate hbs case study

Profits Niche vs Mainstream ( cont.)Although Profit of Mainstream product appears higher than Niche but these profits are expected to arise from cannibalism of 35 – 55 % of Colgate Plus’s sale. 45 %(cannibalism) of $ 51.28 million (Profit Mainstream) is = $ 22.97 MM.Hence on considering the effective profit earned by mainstream product is = $ 28 MM.Therefore Profit by Niche Category is more ($ 31.28 million).

Page 11: Colgate hbs case study

Pricing Strategy for Precision

Considering Profits and to avoid Cannibalism of Colgate plus introduction of Precision as a Niche product is better.

Page 12: Colgate hbs case study

Branding StrategyStressing Precision in comparision to Colgate would limit cannibalization of colgate plus.Even Precision as Niche product would cause as much as 20% cannibalization of Colgate Plus while stressing on Colgate rather than Precision.Therefore the name Colgate Precision must not be adopted.

Page 13: Colgate hbs case study

Promotional Strategy of PrecisionA survey indicated that a product promising to reduce gum-diseases motivated greatest purchase intent.Therefore focusing on Precision’s gum related qualities is most important.Consumer tests revealed that more people were interested in buying the product once they tried it.Therefore sampling will be important for Precision’s success.

Page 14: Colgate hbs case study

Susan was considering following promotional activities :

• A 5 oz. tube of Colgate toothpaste free with a precision toothpaste.• 50% off on toothpaste up to value $1.• 50 Cent discount coupons.• $1.99 mail discount coupons.• Channelling 3million brushes via. Dentists ( To increase

the credibility)

Page 15: Colgate hbs case study

Advertising Strategy for PrecisionIn the case of toothbrushes increased advertisement and promotion enhances category’s visibility which in turn fuels consumer demand.This is clearly depicted in data below (Year 1992’s data)

Product Media Expense $ MM Share Voice (%)

Colgate Plus 8 15

Reach 17.1 31

Oral-B 11.2 20

Others 18.6 34

Page 16: Colgate hbs case study

Advertising Strategy for Precision(Cont...)

The data clearly shows that expenditure on media advertisement is directly proportional to product’s voice share in market.Therefore it is important to have a substantially high budget for media advertisement of Precision as a Niche product.Susan proposed 80% increase in CP’s advertisement budget and out of which 75% must be used for Precision.

Page 17: Colgate hbs case study

Summary• Precision must be priced as Niche product.• Branding must give stress on Precision as compared to

Colgate.• Precision must be promoted as gum caring product.• Higher budget should be allocated for media

advertisements.

Page 18: Colgate hbs case study

Thanks for reading.These slides were create by Samarth Gupta (BITS Goa) under guidance of Prof. Sameer Mathur (IIM Lucknow).