cold fusion : free energy = pseudo science? a new paradigm energy trigger by lenr-cold fusion &...

THE NEW PARADIGM ON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY WITH GEO-SOCIO-FINANCIAL IMPACT

1

COLD FUSION : FREE ENERGY = PSEUDO SCIENCE?

BEN RUSUISIAK NEW NATURE PARADIGM TECH ANALYSISVANCOUVER, BC, CANADA, OCT 1, 2014 www.linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm

http://linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm

2

• Although media calls LENR-Cold fusion as pathological science, it is already in virtual acceptance by mainstream academia: Energy produced with basically free “fuel” & equipment + operation cost, Also Thermonuclear fusion’s trial success for unlimited energy in 2013

• LENR is forecasted to be commercialized by 2016, but note electric car took 100yrs

• This could also cause mainstream full review of science/media ignored recurring new claims of private micro scale use inventor “free energy” tech: 1-Extraction of ambient energy in form of electricity, 2-Back EMF motor, 3-Rapid HHO gas - can also increase hydrocarbon energy output while drastically cut its emission, 4-Creation of plasma or vortex state in water/gas, 5-Heat exchanger, etc

• They seem to run on mechanics & accompanied by side effects current physics cannot explain, low cost infra, & furthermore, are convertible to other “non standard physics” techs with superior effect that can replace majority of propulsion, medical, nuclear waste remediation, & some vital mining-industrial-farming processes - if full scientific peer review followed through

• Increasing documents & testimony on: various “open-end” “pseudo science” R&D at some Gov’t/Aerospace/Military/Intel with covert private contractors, protected under national security i.e. black budget program, which above-stated organization executives themselves often have no access to. This is totally isolated from “dead-end” “public consumption science” which is monitored & restricted by “science law”

• Though both gas-oil-coal based industrial process & alternative energy can remain by innovation, free energy commercialization itself is inevitable & it risks social disruption, Hence need dialogue on if all related tech/info to be officially released & endorsed

ONE PAGE SUMMARY

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada

QUALIFICATION OF INFORMATION GIVEN IN THIS PRESENTATION

• This presentation might not reflect the view of mainstream science & media; hence attendants/readers are recommended to re-assess the data from own independent perspective

• “Free energy” in this report is defined as seeming: ■ Draw of more energy than exerted to generate ■ Continuous motion without energy input

• High likelihood about quoted inventors-scientists: 1- Statistical error chance for false effect claims, plus undetected intentional fraud, some organized-coordinated, is possibility 2- Even greater probability of quality & reliability misrepresentations 3- Significant quality gap between inventions, yet - 4- At least collective majority repeatedly produce claimed effects

• Most effects quoted have accumulative-consistent evidence from unrelated era & source, but mechanics listed are hypothetical

3



• Main academia/media in mid-late 1800s forecasted commercialized free energy by early 1900s(Anthony+), Invention rush of telegraph use Ground Earth Battery repeatedly demonstrated self charging or inducing electricity capacity (Snow, Lockwood, Wilkins, Dieckmann, Strong, Bain, Haworth,Edard, Mellon,Hicks, Bear, Cerpaux, Garratt +) along with strong claims of pre-dated telephony & wireless(Meucci, Stubblefield, Tesla + )

• Non earth battery claims are mixed: Data lack, Fraud, some can be valid

• Small % with sufficient evidence & testimony, involved mainstream scientists till early 1900s, yet no commercialization(see p13-14)

• Not only free energy itself, but repeated side effects in combination don’t fit with “science package” then & now; gradually became pseudo science

QUEST FOR FREE ENERGY: 1 CLAIMS STARTED WELL BEFORE 1800S

4



• Design base & side effects repeated by unrelated inventors, but linear development mostly limited to mainstream academia(LENR+

• Boiled down to 10 or so base mechanics(p7,p9-12) that are also related: often energy is ”triggered” by nuclear “type” reaction, spin-pulse-resonance, rapid vortex-pressure-voltage, magnetic field manipulation but not all necessarily ElectroMagnetic(EM)

• Inventor techs(p9-12) tend to perform differently, by time-location, altitude, latitude, humidity, position direction; similar to ground-earth battery(p4), Rare cases emotion(Carr, Keely, Ring, Davidson, Vogel +)

• Occasional inclination of division: 1 Mainstream Western scientist vs 2 Inventor, sidelined & Non-Western scientist i.e. Russian etc

QUEST FOR FREE ENERGY: 2 TOWARDS MODERN ERA

5



SCIENCE-LEGAL INACTIVE “FREE ENERGY” TECHNOLOGY

• FREE ENERGY TYPES; non-utilized, remain micro scale, or stopped

• ■ Nitinol engine; “Negative metal fatigue” temperature shapeshift metal, in 70s, US Navy backing(Banks, Sandoval, Ginell, McNichols, Hochstein +) ■ Electro-harvester from ground/trees(Karavas, Barbosa, Bryan+, p4) ■ Freq. wave(sound inclu) electricity converter(Cummer, Vanke, Briscoe+) ■ Atomic/Nanogenerators +, Particulates(Yurth+), Negative electro-resistance-carbon(Chung+), Self-Charge Electrochemical Bio-capacitor (Pankratov+), Atomic Hydrogen Welding(Langmuir) ■ Atmos clock+, use of self oscillating Torsion pendulum -Electromechanical transducer, ambience change, can combine with Foucalt pendulum element

• SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER COST TYPES

• ■ Thorium: US in 70s, Uranium took over, nuclear plants use, far less radiation, starting(India, Russia, China, Israel +), portable scale(Dratch +) ■ 20-100%+ increased efficiency engines with change of timing vaporization, carburetor(Pogue, Brandt,Hatton, Myers, Ogle, Caggiano, Fish+

6



MAINSTREAM FREE ENERGY CLAIMS• Senior Western scientists followed academic protocol for peer review

1-LENR-Cold fusion: Low Energy Nuclear Reaction -1989, Heat generates as H2(hydrogen) in water interacts with catalyst(Ni-nickel, Pd-palladium etc) when stimulus applied(heat, current, resonance+)(Pons, Fleischmann 2-Cavitation: Micro bubble fusion - 2002, Extract energy from imploding & light emitting bubble in liquid by acoustic wave excitation, “Semi science legal” mechanics(Taleyarkan, West, Cho,Lahey,Nigmatulin, Block

• Repeated previous mainstream claims(LENR since 1925, Cavitation 1978

• 3-Mainstream fusion: some cost $1billion+/yr, highest by far ■ ICF-Inertial Confinement(US National Ignition Facility+) ■ MCF-Magnetic Confinement(ITER- Tokamak, 30+ others)

• LENR & Cavitation quickly “proven false”, “No results” fusion$ criticized

7



ACADEMIA'S LENR-CAVITATION -VS- INVENTOR TECH

• LENR-Cavitation are generally much higher infrastructure cost compared to inventor type techs(p9-12), (exception: Leopoldo Pirelli High School +)

• LENR-Cavitation both have large variations, each sub-variation tends to have similarity to specific inventor tech, but bulk of their scientists regard them invalid without need for investigation

• Similar physics law breaking mechanics & “anomalies” both at LENR-Cavitation & inventor techs, but latter more openly admit

• Past main academic documents explain mechanics theory(Kelvin, Maxwell, Faraday, Whittaker, Crookes, Poynting, Loschmidt, Webb, Kaluza +)

• Covert compartmentalized inventor type “pseudoscience tech” including gravity field propulsion (Bushman, Rosin, Wood, Pawlek, Rich, Greer +)

8



“INVENTORS’ PSEUDO SCIENCE” FREE ENERGY MECHANICS- 1 & 2

• Micro prv use, an inventor might produce multiple mechanics 1 - 7+ 1-Non-moving resonance coil - Ambient Electro-Inducer(Baumann, Hyde, Thrapp, Tesla, Adams, Hendershot, Trombly, Gritskevitch, Moray, Godin, Chernetski, Craig+

• 2-“Magnetic Motor”- often Back ElectroMotive Force Harnessed(Kawai, Reed, Heins, Parendev, Roshcin, Kenyon, Tracy, Tewari, Reed, Watson, Steinmetz, Ward+), Often involve DC pulse timed spin of magnet imbedded rotor

• Common in 1&2: Often power storage used & some even need constant external power input as their recovery fluctuates +-100%, Bypass regular “self-cancel dipole power circuit” to keep asymmetry & electron flow, Energy output exceeds input when reach threshold level

• Often 1: mix of Regular & Cold electricity: Positive & Reverse energy, Light bulb in water, White light, Rapid battery charge, Absorbs heat, Device can go below 0C, Can be single wire & wireless connection, Voltage with 0 current, Invisible force radiates, Might include cone-toroid-pyramid circuit, Often capacitor based high DC voltage pulse trigger, Spark gap, Intentional spike(choking effect, also accidentally happens at reg current switch off) starts rapid inflow, Transverse wave vs Longitudinal wave

9



• 3-“Overunity” HHO-Brown’s gas production(Klein, Zigorous, Lawton, Ryan, Pantone, Raju, Chambers, Kanarev, Ohmasa, Blue, Pacheco, Vezina, Fukai+), by High voltage pulse electro-lysis, Resonance with little or no current or no electricity at all; some are not electrolysis; ambient energy extracted for molecule bond breaking/loosening, LENR link

• Not hydrogen; Form of water with extra electrons, Heavier than air, Cold flame 130-280C(H2: 2000C+), yet Incinerates(1600C), Burns liquid water, Can pressure back to water, Vaporizes Tungsten(3400C), Disrupts molecule bond(Eckman,Boyce), Implodes in pure form(Knudston,Suartt+, Explosive, Thinner faster cheaper precision cut-welding, More power than H2? Same current with far more produced than H2, Often HHO-H2 mix, 1+ sub form

• Mix well with most conventional liquid & gas fuels in engine & industrial furnace+ : cut emission(50-90%+), Clean engine & increase Efficiency-HP-Mileage(10-40%+, might need computer adjustment, p28), Rare case on board as is use(Meyer, Dingle, Rasmussen, Khan, Garret, Leaich, Estevel, Ahmad+), more gas by water molecule loosened by specific oscillation frequency

• OHMASA gas; “clustered HHO”, Far less prone for explosion, Easy low pressure storage, Flame 700C, Liquid at -180C(O2:-183C H2:-240C)

10

“INVENTORS’ PSEUDO SCIENCE” FREE ENERGY MECHANICS- 3



• 4-Plasma or Vortex Exploder-Imploder, Energy Inducer,(Papp, Britt, Rohner, Rockwell, Ray, Correa, Clem, Rogers, Pantone, Rogers, Neil, Rauen, Robertson, Valkinburg, Coe-Nobel-Stevens: Joe cell +) Vacuum-Ambient energy extracted in non electricity form and exert power though various mechanism

• -Water, Air, Oil, Noble gas mix etc as “energy substrate” in closed container -Often rapid compression-expansion pulse cycle, in sealed or pressured fuel less engine situation; ion oscillated, triggered plasma energy from 0point? Electron Charge Cluster effects? LENR-Cavitation-HHO link(Shoulders, Jin, Fox+ -Or muti-layered low pressure static cylinder; collect “power”& “send” to engine

• 5-Gas/liquid Temperature Gap Energy Exchanger/Electric Converter(Eskelli, Minto, Frenette, Davey+), Similar to 4 but without vortex/plasma, Often abrupt stimulation-pressure change-evaporation to create rapid heating/cooling, Some heat pumps, fridges, air conditioners gauged COP>1 if outside temp gap considered

• 6-Gravity or Centrifugal Force + Magnet(motor)(Simpson, Ribero, Ewert, Campbell, Rutowski, Bedini, Milkovic, AlKhooss, Finsrud+), Need precision: timing, weight balance, movement position, magnet strength, harvesting

11

“INVENTORS’ PSEUDO SCIENCE” FREE ENERGY MECHANICS- 4,5,6



• 7-Super compact fusion: Dense Plasma Focus(Lerner), Infra cost 0.1% of mainstream fusion, no radiation, use Boron, no H2 isotope, Inventor tech link, US Navy backing, Almost mainstream, Trial results in ’09, yet difficulty getting funds!, 3+ other aneutronic fusion trying(no results), Also sustained fusion in 1960s but overunity energy was not officially confirmed(Fairnsworth)

• 8- Less replicated or without recent data, some science legal(also p6): e.g.;

• Ambience related: a-Crystal-geometry electro inducer, b-Carbon nano-tube generators, c-Å-particle emitter isotope cell, d-Self Oscillator(Sweet+

• Water involves: e-Non-oxidizing aluminium based gallium-zinc etc Chemalloy for H2/HHO from water(Freedman+), f-Urine(NH2)2CO or Saltwater Na++Cl-+ H2O “overunity" gas(Gamgee, Adebola+), g-Metal plate dipole water cell, h-Rapid water spiral or air spin power(Gander+) +

12

“INVENTORS’ PSEUDO SCIENCE” FREE ENERGY MECHANICS- 7 +



INVENTOR CHALLENGE: QUEST TO MEET ACADEMIC PROTOCOL 1

• Demo usually witnessed, some thoroughly tested by mainstream scientists on personal or military/aerospace/intel capacity, but rarely academic, using high-bandwidth digital oscilloscope+; Most of volt & amp meter only claims easily found to be errors(Bailey+), but a few turns out “unexplainable”

• They avoid public comment or just say “It appears claim is true” Sometimes local media's positive coverage: “This will change the world” “Will win Nobel prize if real”

• Inventor tech blanket debunking examiners/web sites, quoted widely in alternative energy & free energy field

• No follow up by mainstream science at tenured level that allows peer review; ”free energy is against physics law”, “if it’s real we would’ve known it, hence such claims cannot exist”

13



INVENTOR CHALLENGE: QUEST TO MEET ACADEMIC PROTOCOL 2

• Some try mass production & attract funds from investors, then.. Suddenly discredited as tax/deception/investor Fraud, mental disease etc., Valid process if define “pseudo science” automatically as hoax-scam

• ■ National media quotes above & other scientists’ ridicule of no scientific validity, as investors & local media cancel ■ The inventor stops: Litigation, Lack funds, Patents bought up, Classified as “threat” to “national security” “financial system”, “Advised to stop” etc (Loder, Vesperman, Bearden, Gamble, Lyne, Germano, Aftergood, Callani, Alek +) ■ Some continue, without commercialization, micro private use ■ Now changing - fundraise for research itself is allowed quietly

• Rare cases of prominent politicians, scientists, personnel, magicians vow to testify(Tesla, Moray, Gray, DePalma, Meyer, Newman, Hendershot)

• Actual fraud case seems more likely with unclear validated tech specs, no independent auditing; 1- Complete tech fraud, 2-Non-research $ use by inventor, 3-Alleged cases: a-“Grass roots” fake invention to discredit/divert free energy movement, b-High profile group collect funds to purchase new tech for development yet end up shelving it

14



FREE ENERGY CHALLENGE: QUEST TO MEET ACADEMIC PROTOCOL 1

• Similarly, scientists assure en masse non-existence of gravityfield tech, ignoring 100s of specific military/engineer evidence without investigation, citing indication never exists(Weygandt, Keyhoe, Pope, Dolan, Hellyer, Lovekin, Cooper, Mitchell, Hillenkoetter, Hill-Norton+

• Callers for investigation labeled “fringe theorist” or “pseudo scientist”, compromising or losing academic career (McDonald, O’Leary, Friedman, Hynek, Baker)

• Alleged dismissal, faculty or entire university warned of funding cut if member studies “non-std-science”(Martin, CDF-Galtieri +)

• Reputed labs often decline to test “new science” data, Firmly alleged altered data to block LENR/Cavitation funding(Mallove+)

15



FREE ENERGY CHALLENGE: QUEST TO MEET ACADEMIC PROTOCOL 2

• Influencers can use system to create scientific reality by solely selected convenient evidence:(Gold, Huyghe, McClenon +), paradigm selected by nonscientific-nonempirical factors(Kuhn+), this is commonly observed, not exception, across science(Water, Monetary, Mind, Gene, TopQuark, Peak oil, Biophoton, Archeology,Climate, Medical, Scalar+

• Reduced chance for grant/promotion if contradicts above root assumptions even though unrelated to research theme

• Free energy inventor has never been investigated officially by this modern Western full scientific protocol

• In turn declared to media: In our entire history “Free energy validity has never been found“ ”It’s a proven scientific consensus”

16



SUBTLE SHIFT IN MAINSTREAM ACADEMIA & MEDIA

• Private financial groups’ & affiliated NGO’s direct academic control seemed faded after 1920s, now different funders influence, asked to cooperate for each others’ goal, Interlocked directorates exec-board swap; large funds inter-funnelling amongst them, secure next power job, know each’s needs, goals, undisclosed liabilities including shared activities: NGO, Gov’t, Corporate, Investor(Glattfelder,Quigley,Bauer, Sutton, Dale Scott+

• But growing public & maverick funded full scale mainstream academia “free energy” projects on LENR(numerous in US, France, Italy, Japan, Russia)

• Occasional large science info gap inclination between A & B: A- Main Western media - uniform among US, UK, Canada, Australia, large NGOs, but a few biz-sci media in-between A-B(Wired, Phys+) B- Non-Western main media (BRICS, Iran, some Euro/ex-soviet +), Some Western alternative news

• Large# of mainstream ignored whistleblowers(ie not Snowden, Assange+) of Western gov’t/space/military/intel refer to R&D on various types of “pseudo science” involving exclusive prv contractors, as classified info under national/NATO security. Though they usually match bulk of testimony, often seem to connect to “different group strains, agenda, interpretations” & partial-complete disinfo to complicate data identification (p35,36)

17



LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS: LOTD

• 1ST LAW: Energy cannot be created or destroyed- only change to different forms 2ND LAW: Energy always evens out to create a neutral entropy state

• 1+2: Cannot generate more energy than it is used

• Most of LENR/Cavitation scientists subscribe to

• Taboo of questioning the law in main academia, in rare cases scientists group up to appeal for law reformulation, sometimes described as “delusional, crackpots”

18



THOUGHTS AMONG INVENTORS & “DISSIDENT” SCIENTISTS 1

• Fundamental flaw in law of Thermodynamics(LOTD) or interpretation (Sheehan, Sachs, Keefe, Nikulov, Graeff, Godin, Capek, Gordon +)

• There is no magic, no real “overunity”- energy is everywhere ”across realities”

• Closed System: “0 outside” energy, no perpetual motion, VS Open System: unlimited ambient & vacuum energy, constant sea-air move, earth-moon-star orbit, heat pump; Law selectively applied, Michelson-Morley vs far more extensive Miller + results differ(DeMeo, Allais+): Existence of “dynamic” aether, radiant energy, self organzg 0pt vacuum, torsion-scalar, higgs field with force+

• Based on unproven(some say disproven) assumption only current physical reality exists and nothing else, or this reality is TOTALLY ISOLATED from other realities including vacuum, either case it self contradicts with rest of closed system idea, Vacuum is fluxing, molecules spinning, stars curving-torsion, all perpetually

• OR, need “Reverse LOTD”, Original Maxwell Equation altered when oversimplified; kept transverse wave & dropped “unmeasurable” longitudinal electrical wave & 0 vector vacuum EM potential+ (Reed, Evans, Trupp, Barrett, Grimes,Crowell, Cohen, Morris,Jeffers, Flower+)

19



THOUGHTS AMONG INVENTORS & “DISSIDENT” SCIENTISTS 2

• This ignored longitudinal electrical wave shows unique free energy qualities; Scalar-Torsion wave - “potential only” wave, Penetrates matter, Seems to link to zeropoint energy extraction

• Indication of energy induction; Shubnikov–de Haas-van Alphen, Hall effect

• “Empty” space is full of unlimited energy & trigger its induction with:

• Harmonic resonance: Timing, Sound, High DC voltage pulse-oscillation, Spin rate, Matching vibe frequency- varies by shape, material, location, N-S direction etc Circuit in geometric pattern or position: Spiral, Pyramid, Toroid, Cone / with magnet-current-static Rapid-abrupt movement, pressure, charge, chemical: Implosion, Spiral-Vortex, Counter Rotation, Spike, Catalyst Magnetic field manipulation: Repulse-attract magnet bundling

• “Free Energy” or “Pseudo Science” is like “utilizing jailbroken iphone" functionalities: mainstream doesn’t touch it, & not supposed to exist

20



BRIGHT UPDATE & FORECAST 1: LENR

• LENR: “Virtual” acceptance of its effects by mainstream scientists: academically not beneficial to deny 3000+ peer reviewed reports

• Some in core mainstream focus on trivial effects & unreliability, while others ignore publicized data(Huizenga,Koonin,Park,Seaborg, Morrison+

• “Official” acceptance might come upon agreement on mechanics

• With infra cost & mainstream origin, no “inventor type” operations

• Participated by large co.(Toyota & Aisin, Shell, US Navy, Vattenfall, ENEA, NASA, Siemens, National Instruments, STMicroelectronics, Boeing,Chubu Electric+), mainstream linked researchers(SRI, Elforsk, Continuum Energy Tech, Technova+), major investors(Sunrise, Cherokee, Vanterra-TEM+), gov’ts(US, Italy, Sweden, Russia +), & unnamed co.(Volvo? ABB? NTT? Gates foundation? +)

21



BRIGHT UPDATE & FORECAST 2: LENR

• Several companies deemed to run projects with hold up for open commercialization

• *ECat(Italy), *Defkalion(Greece-Canada), *Mitsubishi Hvy (Japan), *Blacklight Power, Brillouin, Jet (all US)+, Possible other 10+ labs can do project(Israel, Korea, Russia,France+

• Many are LENR based variation tech, proprietary details

• As of Sep 2014: No official LENR generator release/ *ECat still claims “continuing undisclosed pilot projects”/ *Defkalion shift to Phonon Energy in US?/ *discrediting work by energy insiders

• Web portal updates(lenr-coldfusion, cold fusion times +)

22



BRIGHT UPDATE & FORECAST 3: LENR +

• Key is to broadcast success at large industrial/government client sites(Bloom)

• We forecast commercialization by 2016, technically now, but took 100yrs for electric car, Thorium 40yrs, Maybe fusion or grassroots inventor tech spreads first

• Projected 20yrs to replace most of non-renewal electricity generation system after first commercialized “free energy”

• This can trigger large realignment of business, financial, Geo political structure world wide, Losers vs Gainers?

23


linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada 24

!

“FREE ENERGY” IMPACT: WHO LOSES?• Investment funds, Collaterals, CDS, some nations’ tax revenue,

Science-Media credibility, Enviro-Energy NGOs & Research funding

• ■ Oil, N-gas, Coal; Infra, Storage, Transport, Exporters : Need to lower cost, keep & develop new industrial process & product, R&D(HHO?+, p25 p39) ■ Alternative Energy: Need non-monopoly-majors’ unused new mechanics & concepts(eg solar:Schaflander, wind:Schmidt), exclusive niche application

• Industries: Environm’t, Carbon, Gov’t infra, Big Energy Storage-Transmission

• Financial-Military-Industrial group leverage: Oil reserve currency => international trading & finance currency, Energy & carbon derivatives, Less wars & debt; Resource stock asset & world economy control tool

• All industry Interlocked Western geo-econo-political-media-NGO-super rich alliance that held world in stability by mutual financial injection, benefit, & intervention, Above high wage jobs & stakeholders



• Countries: Import oil/gas dependent, Non 1st tier member of world banking system, IMF/WB debt ridden

• Smaller unit communities, remote location, “independent & unaffiliated” private & public companies, increased fresh water availability, Farming

• Hydro-carbon material based manufacturing, Transportation: Tourism, Mining, Commodities, Trading

• Both slants in energy intensive process industries can benefit lower cost: Coal-Gas-Oil: BF Steel, Cement-Lime, Petrochemical, Glass, Food, Clay+ Electricity: DRI-EAF Steel, Aluminium, Chemical, Textile, Industrial gas+ Both heavy: Pulp-Paper, Fertilizer, Mining

• Fuel Cell if incorporates HHO(PEFC test result +), Small Energy Storage

• Financial group? Media orchestrated one time energy stocks shorting

25

!

“FREE ENERGY” IMPACT: WHO GAINS?



WHAT ARE MORE HARMONIOUS FREE ENERGY INTRO SCENARIOS?

• 1- Gradual cost reduction TO Free Energy More expensive —> Less expensive —> Free eg: Coal —> Thorium —> Fusion

• 2- Gradual INFRA reduction cost & tech exclusivity IN Free Energy Most expensive & exclusive: —>Less —>Even less . eg: Fusion —>LENR —>Inventor tech

• 3- Ignoring/discrediting “free energy” by main media & science while allowing commercialization helps avoid “power conversion rush” of mainstream crowd, & assists gradual transition

• e.g. Magnegas(Santilli), low temp GlidArc(Czernichowski), by far lowest cost plasma gasification/cleaning, Ohmasa Gas, some HHO

26



WHAT ARE MORE HARMONIOUS FREE ENERGY INTRO SCENARIOS? -2

• 4- Install “free energy” co-capacity in regular system: hidden Hybrid, Some East Asian & East European nations suspected to start or already manufacturing such appliances/equipments

• Parallel to regular engine-motor circuit, Compressed air engine car can “sneak in” vortex energy

• HHO generator kit ”for additive only” but as is useable, ”Accidental” overunity electrolyzers

• 5- Gradually confirm military aircraft use of electrogravitics or massive overunity electrical-charging(Oechsler, Gunston, Rose, Schratt +)

• 6- Commercialize by local word of mouth, open source or web sales while continuously discredited by science/media

27



IF LENR ACCEPTED FIRST -1 INVENTOR TECH STATUS

• Very small # but increasing private & industrial users benefit with inventor tech(p9-12), especially some part of HHO, Yet mostly still low practicality without major in-house investment, Most remain in prototype, “raw” tech phase; wire sticking out etc

• No standardized review, association, tech vocab, 0 commercialization (p13 -14), mostly small power < 30kw : Foster-ground for deception

• Significant gap in performance & reliability between inventions: How to tell 1-Fraud 2-Works occasionally vs 3-Works normally

• Sole inventor can be sales rep & tech server, might have “out of box” communication manner, business style, beliefs(Allan)

• -No local support due to non-“public consumption physics” nature -Some of confirmed working tech is not replicatable by 3rd party

28



IF LENR ACCEPTED FIRST -2 INVENTOR TECH OPEN SOURCE

• Increased open sourcing, mechanics disclosure, develpmt tips

• 1-Ambient power inducer(Kapanadze, Lindemann +) 2-Magnetic motor back EMF(Keppe, Hamel,Ainslie, Bedini+ 3-Rapid HHO-Brown gas production(Wiseman, H-Cat +)

• Web(free-energy-info,Rexresearch, Panacea-Bocaf, Peswiki+

• Fragmented, unprofessional looking/style presentations

• LENR acceptance —> inventor tech academic review?

29



!

IF LENR ACCEPTED FIRST -3 MORE FUNDING FOR OTHER TECH?

• Mainstream(p7): Cavitation progress (Nanospire +)& LENR link ICFusion success 2013, new low cost Magnetized Target Fusion

• Inventor tech(p9-12):

• Top 3(Ambient, Back EMF, HHO) most un-regulatable & disruptive, portable, lowest cost; but HHO, econo Fusion, & Plasma noble gas can be looked first with closer link to LENR

• Similarities on molecule phenomena to Nano Technology

• Public might ask LENR’s past obstruction inquiry in relation to all other free energy techs/inventors

• Companies/nations benefit with excuse to study inventor tech

30



• Energy in vacuum even at Zeropoint(0K, -273C) is full mainstream consensus, But tapping of unlimited energy is still minority mainstream theory(Cole, Church, Haisch, Piestrup, Rueda, Clarke, Yilmaz, Puthoff, King, Pinto, Capasso, Turtur +), LENR-Cavitation linked Inventor tech(p9-12) can be closer example

• Gravity, inertia, mass is ”ElectroMagnetic like” vibe effect of Self Organizable (spin) wave energy in vacuum field; where basis of matter, probabilities, information exist (Schempp, Jahn, Bohm, Swanson, Baud, Lazlo, Wheeler, Rein+

• It looks overunity, only if ignore vacuum-ambient-static energy: Can be tapped since it’s Not Always Random, EM energy-dipole is asymmetrical between pos-neg; so it can Flow in a Direction(Haken, Lee, Yang, Pregogine+)

• Inventor tech often links to Longitudinal-Scalar/Spin-Torsion wave effects at its energy trigger; Geometry - Cavity Structural Effect - Resonance, Pulse, Spiral, Transmutation, Vacuum energy induction, Cold electricity, Altered electricity forms

31

INVENTOR-ZEROPOINT TYPE TECH HAS MORE IMPACT - WHY? 1



• Its mainstream approval is more disruptive than LENR

• Some inventors “adjust frequency“ to other beneficial effects already in micro use(Reich-weather, Searl-gravity, Kanzius-bio, Schauberger-propulsion, impact water & cleanup, Beneviste-water manipulation, Ebner-bio-gene engineering, Boyce-radiation, Flanagan-geometry, Callahan-Farming, +)

• Inventor tech acceptance can cause their related effects to be also officially investigated on tenured level widely

• Geometry, position, abrupt vortex, catalyst, Precision timed pulse, rotation-spin, & resonance, to: Induce electricity, Send energy wireless, Break water to HHO, Implode, Activate-Block specific body condition-function, Empower-Kill specific virus or cells, Cloaking effect, Transmute mass/radiation, Space-gravity warp effect etc

32

INVENTOR-ZEROPOINT TYPE TECH HAS MORE IMPACT - WHY? 2



• Low cost/effective, *in particular, More use in Russia/China? 1-*Medical (Rife, Priore, Gordon, Becker, Pawluk, Lakhovsky, Matsuura, Tesla +), but some ineffective frauds, 2-*Nuclear remediation- unreleased virtual mainstream tech, some enable “closed loop free energy”? (CERN, Purdue Univ, Mitsubishi, Hitachi/Frolov, Roy, Kervran, Hawkings, Resnick+/also plasma, bacteria+), Local media-gov endorsed Fukushima 2+ pilot projects success but barred by national media-gov’t-academia(Takashima, Higa, Tazaki+), ”Profit & Control structure”; mainstream exaggerates harm while blocks all data on remediation, radioactive waste reuse, low radiation benefit

• Existing service can be replaced if openly introduced, Held off by media, academia, healthcare-enviro NGOs, & public opinion

• 3-Industrial-Farm-Enviro process & 4-Low impact weather control(Orgone: local weather /Structured water, Geometry, HHO: maintenance reduction, larger yield, faster clean up, purewater fertilizer-herbicide, local bacteria-substance identification, reduced water needs, clean air /Resonance: repellent, fertilizer /Cold electricity: underwater or cold temperature lighting

• 5-Anti-gravity: Counter-rotation, Electrogravitics(& Ion wind)etc: Free energy generation involved, Mainstream science till 1950s, then classified(LaViolette, Podkletnov, Brown, Uhouse, Cox, Wolf, De Aquino, Bell, Anastasozki, Roschin, Koontz, Cook, Sewell Ward +)

33

ZEROPOINT-RESONANCE TYPE HAS MORE IMPACT - EXAMPLES



• LOSERS

• ■ Pharmaceutical, Hospital, Medical Equipm’t & Insurance Industries ■ Nuclear waste handling-storage, Large farming corporations, GMO, Conventional fertilizer & herb/insect/fungicide manufacturers ■ Donation & public funding of industry NGOs, R&D ■ Classified tech defence & aerospace co. + their associates(p35): loss of gov’t exclusivity & tech lead from non contractor competitors

• Above jobs & business stakeholders, Investment fund returns

• GAINERS

• ■ Alternative-natural medicine industry, Emergency injury surgical ■ Nuclear power generation, Manufacturing, Farming, Consumers ■ New investment, Low income nations, Independent communities

34

ZEROPOINT-RESONANCE TYPE IMPACT - LOSERS & GAINERS



• Repeated “Alchemy” claims; Transmutation, Nuclear Synthesis: Precious metal, Hydro carbon(Abiotic oil), Also detected at HHO-LENR-Cavitation-Cold electricity (Russia mainstream /DARPA, Toyota/Hutchison, Kenney, LeClair, Simakov, Nefjodov, Russell, Goryachev, François, +), ORMUS link?(superconductivity-monoatomic-scalar-dimensional shift/ Carter, Hudson, Gardner, Milewski, Zhen, Nance+ )

• Theoretical/physical claims, some no actual data, by inventor/scientists (Puthoff, Mayl,Czsyz,Tiller, Hamilton, Kasher, Constable, Del Giudice, Rusek, Naudin, Schürch+, Also claimed by “Main media ignored whistleblowers”, use/test by Military-Intel-Private group(Dean, Adair, Lyne, Puharich, Begich, McCandlish, Arrigo+) some of them claim to testify sanctioned by group commanding strain, believed to be actual/misinfo mixed claims, even if they believe it to be true, compartmentalization causes non-expertise info to distort, also not enough data to validate

• 1-”New” Geo Engineering; a-Non-nuclear bomb big quake trigger, b-Non-particle spray weather control; a-large size by ionosphere, b-any size by scalar 2-Symbio machine 3- Wireless transfer thru ground: energy, sound 4-Material melting-embedding, “transparent” & “disappearing”, effect, water freezing, all at room temp by home electricity 5-Propulsion by gravity field generation & time effect 6-”Physics illegal” super material production: eg magnetic monopole etc - torsion/scalar use? 7-Genomics/gene manipulation by biophoton or electric field 8-”Ectoplasm like pale-while fog” generation where “entities? seem to exist”, life creation? dimension gate? 9-Ancient record of some of above tech

35

ZEROPOINT-RESONANCE TYPE IMPACT POTENTIALS & “OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS”



• Inventor related tech acceptance can trigger “tech suppression” injustice idea, possibly much more…Below likely contains some inaccuracies, Yet it ”seems" easily convertible to a new style low infra tech that is ”destructive as nuclear”; Scalar/Torsion wave: It can target a specific object/area’s “spin frequency" field, of Molecular or Electrical level manipulating-reassembling,

• Certainty of highly classified most “debunking” target for its potential ■ Causes targeted matter to show anomalous behaviour, alter, destruction ■ EM related but nonEM quality; Unshieldable, Superluminal, Non-distance ■ “Holographic” or “physical-mental-time traverse”, “psychic” or chi idea ■ Resonance coupling-amplifying, bio hindrance/geo engineering

• Russian physics(Ratnikov-military,Smetanin, Kaznacheyev, Akimov, Kozyrev, Lunev,Devyatkov,Shipov+), others(Tesla+), effect witness(Mallieu,Golden+), But other related tech with similar risk; Antigravity->Space warp? -theory, LENR-resonance?->Mini pure fusion nuclear bomb- freq’nt claim witness+

• Dialogue can be started by constructive/benefactor focus for tech hold ups

36

ZEROPOINT-RESONANCE TYPE IMPACT - RISKS - “OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS” 2



• LENR can trigger limitation & exclusivity based profitable “Dead-end, Closed System of Physics” into a string of Unlimited ”Open System of Physics” tech & related unofficial info into mainstream that hugely empowers human life

• Yet its concurrent release risks destabilizing economy & social order ■ Serious investment loss in Conventional, Alternative energy, Research, Environment, Medical, Nuclear Waste, Carbon Industries ■ Bankruptcies & domino effect in related sectors, countries, Social distrust of past “deception” by data authority, policy & private lobby, Combination might lead to fundamental social structure change

• Then current science/media's LENR downplay while allowing to develop toward commercializing quietly can be a good strategy But difficult to keep holding back, hence need honest Public Confirmation sometime that gradually leads to new paradigm tech/info Full Disclosure

• Though Western mainstream media & NGO ignored, gradual disclosure continues by “discredited”, low-keyed, or fragment witness, not just in technology(past world geopolitical events & current influence structure, monetary mechanics, behind the scene modern history, off-earth edifice & biology, consciousness, human origin+)

37

CONCLUSION



• At this rate, grassroots forum can gain similar acceptance as mainstream approved-sponsored ones to review actual physical effect vs official reality

• Public viewed video taped Full Open Debate on all “Non-Standard Science” - Western mainstream vs “Fringe” scientists - “Pseudo scientists” led mainstream reviewed full protocol tests

• Destructive side vs benefit: Which tech to allow, or gradual introduction in steps?

• Synergy of existing Nanotech + Genome vs new ” Electron Charge Cluster - Cold electricity - Resonance - Torsion/Scalar - Transmutation Zeropoint - Implosion - ORME” tech & impact; General Relativity reformulation

• Why international tradition of 1000+ energy/propulsion/enviro patent classified? Review Mechanics, Deciders, Criteria, Content(Aftergood, Valone, Tyler, Vaughan, Martens, Schulz, Lee, Marks, Howells +)

• Unconditional blanket witness amnesty/protection(eg South African change

38

RECOMMENDATION 1 SMALL STEP PUBLIC CONFIRMATIONS



• Collaborate with loss-industries: Energy, Alternative energy, Military, Medical, Pharma, Environmental, Nuclear Waste, Carbon, Finance

• Ban or cap max % use of new tech with gradual blend in yrs, e.g. :

• Mandate use of existing facilities & techs - Replace coal power plant boiler by LENR tech - Limit HHO/Ohmasa Gas as emission reducer for coal-oil-Ngas+ - Coal-gas intensive users keep old process: BF Steel, Kiln+(p25) - Only terminal medical patients allowed Radionics(eg. Burzynski

• Use free energy to lower extraction cost of oil, gas, coal etc, “Free” energy from already disposed nuclear waste

• Premium tax on new tech to subsidize loss industries; Finance group to profit like world carbon credit, trading, & derivatives

• Media PR of “old trusted tech”, gov’t priority contract given 39

RECOMMENDATION 2 : POLICY ON GRADUAL DISCLOSURE & TRANSITION


cold fusion : free energy = pseudo science? a new paradigm energy trigger by lenr-cold fusion &...

Economy & Finance

free energy commercialization

unlimited energy

extraction of ambient

hydrocarbon energy output

energy input high likelihood

vancouver bc

science package

pathological science