co2 in wyoming...2007/06/26 · 15 2008 status 14 injectors: 8 wag injectors 6 co2 injectors 17...
TRANSCRIPT
1
EORI Wyoming Joint Producers Meeting
CO2 in Wyoming
The Beaver Creek Madison CO2 Project
NORWEST QUESTA ENGINEERING June 26, 2007
2
Beaver Creek Madison CO2 Flood Project
Overview
• Geographic Setting• Geologic and Reservoir setting• History of the field & evaluation• Phased Evaluation Methodology• Project Status
3
COCO22 Floods in WyomingFloods in Wyoming
Merit EnergyWertz/Lost Soldier
Anadarko Patrick Draw Monel Unit
AnadarkoSalt Creek Field
Devon Beaver Creek Field
4
Beaver Creek Madison Structure Beaver Creek Madison Structure
10
1516
9
ApproximateOil - Water
Contact
-5700- 5700
0065-
0036-
-620
0
0016
-
0016-
0006
-
0006-
- 590
0
0095-
0085
-
- 58 00
Active Oil Producer
Active Water Injector
W
4317
31 22
55
403844
3266
41 68
11
5614
39-M45 46
30
42
52
34
5769
77
81
96
107
104
117
127
124137
136139
143146
147
FEET
0 1,518
PETRA 12/13/2005 5:04:00 PM
Geologic CharacteristicsLimestone/Dolomite MatrixApprox. Prod. Area = 974 AcresApprox. Oil Column Height = 820’Avg. Net Pay Thickness = 212’Avg. Depth to Madison Top = 11,100’
Reservoir CharacteristicsPorosity = 10%Permeability = 9 mdReservoir Temp = 234o FBHPi = 5301 psiaGORi = 288 scf/bblBubble Pt. = 673 psiaSwi = 10%Oil Gravity = 39.5
o API
Type Log
5
Madison Log Section(GR/ Bulk Density)
• BCU #127 Well• Top @ 11224’ MD• Bottom @ 11723’ MD
Madison Base
F Zone Top
E Zone Top
D Zone Top
C Zone Top
B Zone Top
A Zone Top
6
Backthrust(Eastern Fault)
Madison (HW)Main Block
Madison (FW)Subthrust
Beaver Creek Structure Viewed From the South
Beaver Creek Madison StructureBeaver Creek Madison Structure
3D Seismic View
7
Background & Evaluation History
• Madison reservoir discovered January 1954• Waterflood initiated in 1959 with peripheral flood• Water injection expanded to pattern flood through 1964 -• Reservoir developed with 36 completions• Currently have 21 active wells including 12 producers and 9
injectors• Current Production of 300 bopd, 29,000 bwpd & 13,000 bwipd• CO2 flood potential originally identified in Amoco’s 1987 CO2
Feasibility StudyDetermined marginally economic in 1987(low oil price)Identified need to review fracture intensityObtain measured rel/perm and rock data
• Devon revived the project idea in January 2005
Beaver Creek Madison FieldBeaver Creek Madison Field
8
Beaver Creek Madison UnitProduction History
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
Jan-50 Jan-60 Jan-70 Jan-80 Jan-90 Dec-99 Dec-09
Mon
thly
Vol
umes
(Bpd
, Mcf
d)
OilGasWaterWINJ
Main Block (Target)OOIP = 109 MMboCum Oil = 42.5 MMbo (39% OOIP)Rem = 2.6 MMbo
Early waterflood
Beaver Creek Madison Production HistoryBeaver Creek Madison Production History
9
Evaluation Methodology
Phase 1 - Initial scoping and feasibility review
Phase 2 - Data acquisition & detailed sector modeling
Phase 3 - Final full field 3D modeling and flood design
Three Phase Evaluation ProcessThree Phase Evaluation Process
10
Phased Evaluation
Phase 1 - Initial scoping and feasibility reviewPhase 1 - Initial scoping and feasibility review
• Gathering & Evaluation of Existing Data
• Review Against Screening Criteria
• Analytical Simulation
• Preliminary economic evaluation
11
Phased Evaluation
Phase 2 - Data acquisition & detailed sector modelingPhase 2 - Data acquisition & detailed sector modeling
• Build production and well history database• Reservoir engineering analysis• Secure special core and PVT data• Build 3D compositional model
Mechanistic numerical simulation (fine scale)Sector Forecast
12
Phased Evaluation
Phase 3 - Final full field modeling and flood designPhase 3 - Final full field modeling and flood design
• Full field 3D compositional modelHistory matchingIdentified where remaining oil existsForecast
Base (as is) forecast4 Development pattern options
Sensitivity analyses WAG cyclesSurface facilities limitations
• Final Economic analysis
13
Phase 3 - Full Field Compositional 3D Model
14
Phase 3 - Forecast
Flood Design Options
Plan 1: Peripheral CO2-WAG Plan 2: Pattern CO2-WAGPlan 3: Combined Plan 1 & Plan 2Plan 4: Peripheral-Gravity drainage
Flood Design Options
Plan 1: Peripheral CO2-WAG Plan 2: Pattern CO2-WAGPlan 3: Combined Plan 1 & Plan 2Plan 4: Peripheral-Gravity drainage
15
2008 Status
14 Injectors:8 WAG injectors6 CO2 injectors
17 Producers
12 Shut-in or producingfrom other formation orTA
Detail:3 well conversion (prod->Inj):
44, 146, 1438 old producers:
11, 38, 41, 46, 68, 147, 66, 812 shut-in:
14, 966 old injectors:
40, 17, 30, 32, 45, 1397 new producers:
D, E, F, G, H, I, J, L4 new injectors:
A, B, C, K1 Injector reactivation:
311 Producer reactivation:
77
57
61
34
40
42
43
56
55
69
22
77
39
127
11
38
41
44
46
66
68
81
143
146
147
14
17
30
32
45
96
139
ctivector
tive
Low confidence inside this area
us
C
B
A
D
E
F
HJ
G
I
KL
Plan 1 – Peripheral CO2-WAG
16
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
57
61
34
40
42
43
52
56
55
69
22
77
39
127
11
38
41
44
46
66
68
81
143
146
147
14
17
30
32
45
96
139
Remaining oil in place (rb/acre)
Red = InactiveBlue = injector
Black = active
Low confidence inside this area
Well status
C
B
A
D
E
F
HJ G
I
KL
WG
2008 Status
18 Injectors:All WAG injectors
14 Producers
Detail:2 well conversion (prod->Inj):
44, 146, 9 old producers:
11, 38, 41, 46, 68, 147, 66, 81, 1438 old injectors:
40, 17, 30, 32, 45, 139, 14, 964 new producers:
L, D, E, J8 new injectors:
A, B, K, H, F, G, I, C1 Producer reactivation:
77
Plan 2 - Pattern CO2-WAG
17
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
2006 2008 2010 2012 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027
Oil
rate
(stb
/d)
Plan 1Plan 2Plan 3Plan 4
Results - Summary
18
•Convert 3 wells from producer to injector
• Rework or recomplete 15 wells
• Drill 8 new producers & 4 new injectors
• Construct Production & Injection Facilities
• Install New Flowlines for Producers & Injectors
• Build CO2 Supply Pipeline
Beaver Creek Madison CO2 Flood
Work Requirements
19
Where Are We Today?
Drilling program initiatedRework/recompletion program under wayCO2 gas contract in placeCO2 pipeline construction to begin SeptemberDistribution and flow lines orderedCompressor & Dehydrator orderedFacilities construction to begin this week
July 2008 project start
Beaver Creek Madison CO2 Flood
20
Modeling Risk Reduction
0
4
8
12
16
Δcu
m O
il (M
Mst
b) MaxMin
Phase-IAnalytical
Phase-IINumerical
(Sector Model)
Phase-IIINumerical(Full Field)
21