closing the gap? the global south’s prospects asia, africa, and latin america in a similar...
Post on 15-Jan-2016
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Closing the Gap? The Global South’s Prospects
• Asia, Africa, and Latin America in a similar economic position four decades ago
: now huge income gaps among them.
• Countries in East Asia: the top position
• Latin America: in the middle
• Africa: on the bottom.
: some African countries have deteriorated since 1960
• is it possible for the Global South to escape the vicious cycle of poverty?
• those Global South states that have fossil fuels
: 12 members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
• NIEs (semiperiphery)
: newly industrialized countries in Asia
: Asian Tigers - South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong
• can other Global South emulate their success?
• how about China?
• what kind of catch-up models could they adopt?
Rising Power: China
As workers tried to demolish his home last month in Shenyang, this man hurled a firebomb at them
Police and military forces awaited a protest over water pollution in Xin Chang on July 18, 2005
Land of 74,000 Protests
• a growing uneasiness in China
: increasingly bold protests rolling across the countryside.
: from rampant industrial pollution to widespread evictions and land seizures by corrupt local governments in cahoots with property developers
: inequality
• ''There are a great many socioeconomic factors to stimulate protest, such as the increasing gap between rich and poor... But the masses are angry basically because of abuse of power by party officials. … the perception is that the officials don't want to pursue the state's interests, so much as pursue their own interests -- both legal and illegal.''
- Wu Guoguang, a former government adviser and People's Daily editorialist
• the 74,000 mass incidents, or demonstrations and riots occurred in 2004: an increase from 58,000 the year before: only 10,000 a decade ago: hundreds of these events each week
• other signs of concern : a notice by the armed forces warning soldiers
- they would be ''severely penalized'' for taking part in petitions or demonstrations.
• The Communist government warned : citizens to obey the law, saying threats to social order would
not be tolerated• many Chinese identify
: official corruption as the biggest source of their woes.
• the Chinese system of government: based on a monopolization of power by the Communist Party
- inhibits transparency - prevents the development of the kinds of checks and
balances
Zbigniew Brzezinski vs. John Mearsheimer
• Is China more interested in money than missiles?
• are the U.S. and China destined to fight it out?
• will China push the U.S. out of Asia?
Brzezinski Mearsheimer
liberalist realist
optimistic pessimistic
- theory is retrospective
- sometimes theory does not work
- we need theory
- theory helps us to predict the future (2025)
- China is assimilating into the international system
- (military) confrontation is less likely to happen
- new Cold War
- (military) confrontation is more likely to happen
make money, not war better to be Godzilla than Bambi
- not inclined to challenge the U.S. militarily
- cautious foreign policy prevails
- China cannot rise peacefully
- China has a vested interest to causing troubles in the U.S.’s backyard
- determined to sustain its economic growth
: other political realities – the 2008 Olympic Games, the 2010 World Expo
: a confrontational FP could disrupt economic growth and threaten the Communist Party’s hold on power
- other factors (nationalism, Taiwan issues) override economic considerations
- now concentrates on building their economy to the point where it is bigger that the U.S. economy
: translates economic strength into military might
- the Chinese leaderships: more flexible and sophisticated than previous challengers
- they are not more principled, more ethical, less nationalistic that the Westerners
- China increases its regional preeminence
- but China cannot push the U.S. out of East Asia
- it does not have a military capability
- it is vulnerable to an isolation enforced by the U.S.
- Japan has an impressive military program
- China attempts to be a regional hegemon
- China will try to push the U.S. out of Asia
- in 2025 when China has a much larger GNP and a more formidable military than it has today
A. Modernization Theory
• modernization theory: dominant in the 1950s and 1960s.
• the underdevelopment: posed by the Global South’ own internal characteristics
• after independence, many advocates of economic development: the former colonies
- emulate the Global North : a central belief
- all societies go through similar stages of development. (1) underdevelopment (2) take-off, and (3) modernity
• “Washington consensus”: free markets
- bring about economic growth and wealth: create conditions for efficient production, free
enterprise, and free trade: pass through stages of development and reach “take off”: everyone would enjoy the benefits: the gap between the rich and the poor is reduced: the Global South
- similar to the Global North
• Western Europe and the U.S.: models of development for the rest of the world
• critics: ignore specific problems and conditions in Global
South: disregard these areas’ historical, cultural, economic,
and political differences: tend to treat African, Asian, and Latin American
societies as a monolithic group
The Great Divide in the Global Village
• critics
: historical conditions that allowed the North to do this in the 19th century do not exist now
• per capita incomes between 1970 – 1995
: in the richest one-third of countries rose by annual 1.9 %
: in the middle third went up by 0.7 %
: the bottom third no increase
• foreign direct investment rose sevenfold between 1980 and 1997
: but little has gone to the poorest countries
: 70% between rich countries
: 8 Global South received 20%
: 100 poor nations received only 10%
• free markets offer opportunities for all
: but opportunities do not guarantee results
• most of poor countries
: not able to take advantage of free market access
• the traditional advantage of the Global South
: in primary commodities (agriculture and minerals)
- they have shrunk from 70 % of world trade in 1900 to 20% in 1990s
B. Dependency Theory and World System Theory• based on Marxism
: capitalism is a cause of inequality• Latin America• the relationship between the advanced
capitalism (the core) and the Global South (the periphery): exploitative
• underdevelopment: a product of the Global South’ structural
position / colonialism
• Andre Gunder Frank • the study of chronic underdevelopment in
Latin America• dependency
: a condition of retarded economic growth - results from the Global South’
subordination - structural exploitation by the Global
North
a. Dependency theory
• Dominance-dependence relationship between North and South
• dependent countries
: vulnerable to penetration by outside forces (MNCs, IMF, World Bank)
• Global North keeps Global South poor through
: terms of free trade and finance (international market, IMF’s loans)
: exploitation by multinational corporations (Exxon Mobil, GM etc.)
: foreign direct investment
• share dependency theorist’s view
• Wallerstein
• core
: advanced capitalist states
: specializes in producing “advanced goods”
• periphery
: developing states
: specializes in producing commodities and low-technology goods
• semiperiphery
: states either advancing toward core (Asian Tigers) or descending to periphery
b. World System Theory
• the relationship between the core and the periphery
: established by colonialism.
• Global South continue to be
: suppliers of raw materials
: importers of manufactured products from rich industrial countries.