classification of molecular subgroups of head and neck...

1
Classification of Molecular Subgroups of Head and Neck Cancer with Histological Sections Kuy Hun Koh Yoo, Muhammad M. Almajid, Markus Zechner Energy Resources Engineering Department, Stanford University Motivation and Background Image Preprocessing Experiments & Results Recent research found 5 possible molecular subgroups of head and neck cancer 2 Currently there is no focused/individual cancer treatment Currently, DNA screening is required to identify the subgroup this is very costly and not often performed The goal of this project is to identify the molecular subtypes from pathological images The Cancer Genome Atlas (cancergenome.nih.gov, TCGA project) Head and Neck Cancer: 520 Patients Subgroups 1: 148; 2: 79; 3: 113; 4: 60; 5: 120 Images are approx. 30,000x30,000 High resolution details are important features Labels: Unsupervised clustering of DNA methylation data Shift from clinical factors to biological features Tile Statistics Subgroup 1: 642,215 Subgroup 2: 324,617 Subgroup 3: 463,460 Subgroup 4: 246,731 Subgroup 5: 496,719 Data 50 Patients - Our Model 5 Classes 2 Classes 50% 100% Label 1 Label 2 Label 3 Label 4 Label 5 50 Patients - Our Model 5 Classes 50% 50 Patients - Our Model 2 Classes 50% Localization is very likely to play an important role: the entire histology section should be used Medical professional input is required to assert that DNA information is contained in images Validation must be interpreted with care: localization + low # patients Computational resources are critical True Label: 1 True Label: 1 Our Model [1] Camelyon2016. https://camelyon16. grand-challenge.org/. Accessed: 2017-06-04. [2] K. Brennan, J. Koenig, A. Gentles, J. Sunwoo, and O. Gevaert. Identification of an atypical etiological head and neck squamous carcinoma subtype featuring the cpg island methylator phenotype. EBioMedicine, 17:223236, 2017. [3] Cancer.Net. Head and neck cancer: Statistics, 2017. [Online; accessed 16-May-2017]. [4] R. L. Grossman, A. P. Heath, V. Ferretti, H. E. Varmus, D. R. Lowy, W. A. Kibbe, and L. M. Staudt. Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(12):11091112, 2016. [5] L. Hou, D. S, T. M. K, Y. G, J. E. D, and J. H. S. Patchbased convolutional neural network for whole slide tissue image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 24242433, 2016. [6] Y. Liu, K. Gadepalli, M. Norouzi, G. E. Dahl, T. Kohlberger, A. Boyko, S. Venugopalan, A. Timofeev, P. Q. Nelson, G. S. Corrado, et al. Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel pathology images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02442, 2017

Upload: others

Post on 02-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Classification of Molecular Subgroups of Head and Neck ...cs231n.stanford.edu/reports/2017/posters/523.pdf · head and neck cancer2 Currently there is no focused/individual cancer

Classification of Molecular Subgroups of Head and Neck Cancer with

Histological Sections Kuy Hun Koh Yoo, Muhammad M. Almajid, Markus Zechner

Energy Resources Engineering Department, Stanford University

Motivation and Background

Image Preprocessing

Experiments & Results

Recent research found 5 possible molecular subgroups of

head and neck cancer2

Currently there is no focused/individual cancer treatment

Currently, DNA screening is required to identify the

subgroup – this is very costly and not often performed

The goal of this project is to identify the molecular subtypes

from pathological images

The Cancer Genome Atlas (cancergenome.nih.gov, TCGA

project)

Head and Neck Cancer: 520 Patients

Subgroups 1: 148; 2: 79; 3: 113; 4: 60; 5: 120

Images are approx. 30,000x30,000

High resolution details are important features

Labels: Unsupervised clustering of DNA methylation data

Shift from clinical factors to biological features

Tile Statistics

Subgroup 1: 642,215

Subgroup 2: 324,617

Subgroup 3: 463,460

Subgroup 4: 246,731

Subgroup 5: 496,719

Data

50 Patients - Our Model

5 Classes 2 Classes

50%

100%

Label 1 Label 2 Label 3 Label 4 Label 5

50 Patients - Our Model – 5 Classes – 50%

50 Patients - Our Model – 2 Classes – 50%

Localization is very likely to play an important role: the entire

histology section should be used

Medical professional input is required to assert that DNA

information is contained in images

Validation must be interpreted with care: localization + low #

patients

Computational resources are critical

True Label: 1True Label: 1

Our Model

[1] Camelyon2016. https://camelyon16. grand-challenge.org/. Accessed: 2017-06-04.

[2] K. Brennan, J. Koenig, A. Gentles, J. Sunwoo, and O. Gevaert. Identification of an atypical

etiological head and neck squamous carcinoma subtype featuring the cpg island methylator

phenotype. EBioMedicine, 17:223–236, 2017.

[3] Cancer.Net. Head and neck cancer: Statistics, 2017. [Online; accessed 16-May-2017]. [4]

R. L. Grossman, A. P. Heath, V. Ferretti, H. E. Varmus, D. R. Lowy, W. A. Kibbe, and L. M.

Staudt. Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data. New England Journal of Medicine,

375(12):1109–1112, 2016.

[5] L. Hou, D. S, T. M. K, Y. G, J. E. D, and J. H. S. Patchbased convolutional neural network

for whole slide tissue image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2424–2433, 2016.

[6] Y. Liu, K. Gadepalli, M. Norouzi, G. E. Dahl, T. Kohlberger, A. Boyko, S. Venugopalan, A.

Timofeev, P. Q. Nelson, G. S. Corrado, et al. Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel

pathology images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02442, 2017