class effectiveness rubric

2
Teacher Evaluation EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASS EVALUATION Name: Branch: Level: Topic: Length of Service at Branch: Previous Evaluation: Assessable Criteria Points awarded 1. Teacher arrived on time to start class. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 2. All materials were ready before class began. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 3. Aims of lesson were stated or written. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 4. Teacher greeted students in a friendly manner. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 5. There was a complete warm up to the lesson. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 6. Teachers language was clear and level appropriate throughout the lesson. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 7. Students were motivated by the topic and the teacher and were engaged throughout. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 8. Language presentation was well-planned and teacher introduced effectively. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 9. All language was concept checked by the teacher and examples elicited. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 10. Students were given the opportunity to practice the language points. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 11. Students had the opportunity to work in pairs and groups during the lesson. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 12. Teacher monitored activities, providing input where necessary. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 13. Regular meaningful feedback was given to the students a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 14. There was a clear non-teacher-led produce activity. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 15. The teacher used various methods and activities throughout the class to keep interest high. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 16. There was a meaningful wrap up to the lesson. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 17. The students demonstrated learning had occurred. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 18. The teacher remained in the room as the students left. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0 Total: Grade: Comments Strengths: Areas for Improvement

Upload: pagodatrainer

Post on 08-Apr-2016

265 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Class effectiveness rubric

Teacher Evaluation

EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASS EVALUATION

Name: Branch: Level: Topic:

Length of Service at Branch: Previous Evaluation:

Assessable Criteria Points awarded

1. Teacher arrived on time to start class. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

2. All materials were ready before class began. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

3. Aims of lesson were stated or written. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

4. Teacher greeted students in a friendly manner. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

5. There was a complete warm up to the lesson. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

6. Teachers language was clear and level appropriate throughout the lesson.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

7. Students were motivated by the topic and the teacher and were engaged throughout.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

8. Language presentation was well-planned and teacher introduced effectively.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

9. All language was concept checked by the teacher and examples elicited.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

10. Students were given the opportunity to practice the language points.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

11. Students had the opportunity to work in pairs and groups during the lesson.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

12. Teacher monitored activities, providing input where necessary.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

13. Regular meaningful feedback was given to the students a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

14. There was a clear non-teacher-led produce activity. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

15. The teacher used various methods and activities throughout the class to keep interest high.

a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

16. There was a meaningful wrap up to the lesson. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

17. The students demonstrated learning had occurred. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

18. The teacher remained in the room as the students left. a) 5 b) 3 c) 1 d) 0

Total: Grade:

Comments

Strengths:

Areas for Improvement

Page 2: Class effectiveness rubric

Teacher Evaluation

EFFECTIVENESS OF CLASS EVALUATION

Points/Evaluation Key

Maximum Points = 90

Score Range Evaluation & Assessment of Teacher Next Action

80 - 90 Excellent planning, excellent teaching, excellent approach to the students. Very effective class

No action Required. Regular observation schedule.

60-79 Good planning, teaching and interaction with the students. Some room for improvement in

specific areas. Effective class.

Teacher asked to examine areas for improvement for next regular observation.

50-59 Some planning but often inadequate, teaching generally ok but without development. Many areas for improvement. Fairly ineffective at

times.

Teacher told to improve on problem areas, follow up observation scheduled.

40-49 Lackluster approach to the class, little evidence of planning or execution. Mostly Ineffective.

Teacher given retraining and warning. Second Observation same month.

20-39 Poor approach to lesson, attitude causing an uncomfortable atmosphere in class Ineffective.

Teacher given warning and 30 days to improve. Observation within the week.

0-19 Teacher lacked structure and organization. Class was ineffective.

Teacher given 30 days notice.

Points Description of points awarded

5 Teacher demonstrated the skill with excellence.

3 Teacher demonstrated the skill well.

1 Teacher showed a lackluster approach to the skill.

0 The skill was absent from the class.