the United
to be
tion
citizenship
of
the
recommendations
thereon,
reported
to
the
to
citizenship,
expatria-
however,
be
reached
in
any
prepare
a
report
and
propose
legislation
that
under such rules and
place of
to
record
at
to
United States
and
to
give
to the
United States
be
authorized,
passports
applicable
to
a
divorce, she may re-
convenient American consulate,
abroad; if
marriage to an
citizenship upon
abroad
United
to American
with the
countries.
The
sub-
Respectfully submitted.
regarding
citizenship
as secretary
to
become
of
protection
of
nativity
book provided
for that
their
birth,
the
names
and
residence
of a
years
effect^
good
there was fluctuation in the
practice of protecting naturalized citizens
upon
their
return
27,
18.68
(15
embodied
in
are
the same protection
This
After the Declaration of Independence
and
before
the
of the
several State
years
previous
of American
King, this
citizens,
must
be
so
considered
of native American citizens
III,
563.)
Thus
with a
had
formerly
been
States or
dominions),
J. S.
and clothing him with
been.
we
persons of
act
of
naturalization
may
be true. It has no foundation
to
the dogma
doctrine,
although
recognition
of
naturalized
citizens
are
violated
to their immunities and
citizen
be
compelled
to
same extent and
in-
closures,
filed
for
future
States
of
the
ject has
express permission of his sovereign ; he may
not renounce his original
B.
The right of expatriation is admitted, provided there exists at
the
the attitude of
(For
example,
of
States can
does
obtain-
law
of
the
27,
uninterruptedly
within
shall
be
The substance
United
States
will
be
considered
by
Belgium
as
citizens
of
which was
Secretary
refusing a
passports to the
by
against
It
abroad
show
that
many
a
citizen
might
by
all
instances
manner,
confined
to
their
a
brief
good rea-
choose to
in many foreign
countries is not permitted to aliens unless they are furnished with
evidence
of
required,
but
it
form.
Unfortunately,
do
zens, but it
and last place
furnish
to
diplomatic
and
consular
representatives
of
the
United
of
American
citizens
resident
abroad,
in
tion, the
former an
of
that
fact;
but
either
described
below.
for
would
of
foreign
affairs
of
his
arrival
and
his
experience
in
Spanish residents, as well
which they may have.
the register shall
policy
to
attaining
their
majority
is that our
of liability
residing
in
to
it,
to the
his
ambiguity
person whose intention
person there
ance
of
his
until his
ing a
his absence
merely as a
highest
civic
privilege
enjoyed
by
free
men
the
the
subject
may
comes
If, on
protect to the
pretenders—this
without having
that
naturalization
system.
Realizing
accept the
have made the
of the
should
resided
to become a
final
-applica-
4,
par.
1,
honorably
(sec.
216G,
have not
made the
(act
of
July
25,
1894),
Navy
Department
United
States
certain
Washington he
Illinois and
States
he
during the
civil war
he was
though
he
made
rights
29,
1906,
Thayer said
on this
parent com-
pletes his
they find impressed upon them, and determine that they will
accept
allegiance
to
some
foreign
potentate
Nevertheless, the Government
it
may
be
the term continuous
United
berg,
and
tends
he
must
to make
a
trip
abroad frequently apply to the Department of State for some docu-
ment
(act of June
only
erally
attesting
the
right
any
the United
making
it.
It
follows
that
aliens not
make the
and
in
order
that
the
might
issue
Until
recent
abroad
than
is
due
to
and
Indeed, it is
that domicil depending
as
sojourning
would
be
justified
in
claiming.
Viewed
evident
an
the most solemn
of
a
foreign
government
and
allegiance
state
expatriation
in
preceding paragraphs
expatri-
ate
himself
shall
comment. Other
himself
from
the
in
different
self
and the
the
United
States
be by
a
citizen,
and
July
27,
1868,
was
evolved,
as
pre-
United
States
shall
his
domicile
therein
which
interposition
of
the
his,,citizenship.
A
of Rhode Island,
character,
first,
by
against
the
United
States,
shall
have
citizenship
in
resuming
his
permanent
declaration of his
States.
effect,
and
how
citizenship
might
be
protection,
the
consideration
and
might
properly
be
postponed.
citizens who
the United
reasons
increase
duty
Executive
in
authenti-
cation
of
United
to put the
went abroad
to obtain
refuse
a
assassinate
the
ultan
of
impossible
for
having
placed
himself
where
United
States.
reciprocal obligations,
is withdrawn;
he
returns
to
protection
may,
if
he
goes_
abroad
again,jreceiie-2his
to assume,
that the
conditions have
When
is in the
this
is
removes
its
writers as well
the
it with
intent not
it
contained
a
provision
by
word
resides,
or
of
of tly^ecPwitnesses,
declare
to
IV,
vol.
10,
p.
129,
by the
1822 the
expatriation of
very interest-
expatriation,
foreign
once
citizens
of
the
United
claim
to
ization,
expatriation,
and
to
multiplied,
the
a new
before
he
can
become
an
books, so
the services
the
subject
of
protection
and
expatria-
by registering
born without the
during the
into the
United States
the first condition
of
married an American
cases
as
follows:
That
deemed
citizen.
29
and privileges
of a
husband. The acts of
been
the alien widow of
Forgey,
1823,
1
Cowen,
89,
Sutliff v. Forgev
ruling and
has
Kelly
of persons
for whose
And the
cases have
Owen,
has
been
again
between
those
cases
woman
by
(Ware v.
His
citizenship,
whenever
it
exists,
confers
under
the
there is
a woman
who,
previous
to
his
meyer,
bandl
opposed.
not changed
American
citizen
1855,
later
married
of
the
plaintiff
and
yet the
spirit of
the two
announced in
such cases as Ware
supra (to
ican citizen becomes thereby an American citizen), and if foreign
countries assume
naturalization
by
marriage,
England,
France,
Germany,
native-born citizen
wife of
Augustine Comitis
Beer,
was a permanent
Y.,
356.)
resident in
they
will
be
whether or not
parents in America became by that act citizens of the
United
on
minor
and
before
the passage f the act by virtue of which she was
afterwards
that
the
be
to cover all aliens
who
had
come
the
is not necessary.
the
ground
of
the
of the chancellor,
it is to
citizenship
justment of allegiances
person
to
become
American
citizens.
The
court
held
child
becomes
by
virtue
of
minor children
minority
of
the
72
A. Where
Americans
naturalize
aliens
88
court
119
(c)
124
A. Who may
Sec. 8.
father 138
143
sovereign
State
154
Chapter
 V
168
EXHIBIT.
A.
States
possessed
by
the
(general),
1864
238
thereof, are citizens
the
privileges
or
immu-
nities
due
process
of
And
 
on
light of the common
ship and naturalization
upon by
printed
of the United States
citizenship
the juris-
same
classification
Additions
might
always
be
citizens may
the
question
of
the courts have recognized
some viewpoints,
section
2,
as
does
and
within
are
a complete
at home
to
both
jurisdictions
of a
protection from both.
protection from
it concerned
citizenship of
the State
connection,
1893,
vote, not
party
had
left
the
a number
constitutional provision which
to
bring
under
similar
was still resident
Insurance
Co.,
1826,
1
Paine
C.
C,
594.*
see People v.
that though
they may
have voted,
this did
courts have in
or assumed
in
connection
with
Government
reservations.
SECOND.
of
expatriation,
part
3,
desir-
able.
It is entirely clear that one who resides in a country assumes
a
cer-
other
its part the nation in which
he
re-
Ark,
1897,
169
U.
predicable
of
aliens
in
amity,
so
long
as
native-born citizen
Constitution which de-
treaty of
their
residence
be
unless it
was shown
that he
tion
the
alienage
whom
he
question
of
never had any
He
also
stated
that
he
did
ship
about it,
had never
been naturalized
as a
Where,
v.
McMasters,
1857,
the
alien
whose
Commonwealth,
by
a
in question
had been
declared that
of 1802.
1883,
50
Fed.,
310 ;
country
country is, that a
Independence
taking lands, subsequently,
the
defendant,
born
1760,
United
States
obtain
a
a subject of
account
lose
the country
removal
be
admitted
to
by
residence,
it
seems
perfectly
reasonable
that
and trades
addition
takes an oath of
same, and
to
the
commercial
privi-
fully
later,
the
foreign
domicile
of
an
American
citizen has no effect upon the citizenship not only of himself,
but of
from one entering for
time have been interpreted to mean that this right may
be
withdrawn
by
Congress.
See
quired
a
seems sometimes
(See
the
78,
96,
Mr.
Green
there
is
if
upon
stances
of
his
origin is not
1865,
Federal
in mind
The Constitution of
power
place
is
the
the
Indians
to a
and treaties
to prove
war, of
difficulty
remains.
Do
the
Cherokees
constitute
a
foreign
state
nation is
tion
of
geographical
treatises,
histories,
and
treaties,,
;
a then
unsettled construction
of the
reside within the
are in
or to form a
go
far
to
support
the
in view
when they
Union
to
controversies
between
retaining
as the
of
cut
timber
United
alternate sections
by the
citi-
Lucero,
1
New
Mexico,
The
by
the
authority
and
under
note.
Georgia
authorities
such
an
individual
jurisdiction under the
have uniformly and
jurisdiction they were not
Ferguson,
1893,
life,
he
will
be
of
the
Indians
as to
hereby, authorized
by
jurisdiction
of
the
court,
although
the
precise
was not
as a
The
re-
the
Government
had
court, examining
tolerated. In the
Second.
The
wife,
(Jack-
(393).
executed by
an individual
Indian was
supra.)
States
may
reservations,
.
the
recog-
nized
political communities, and
so far as
The In-
testate, Indian chief Hole in the Day, therefore, was not a citizen
of
the
held
vation with the
had for
a voter
Indian was
born in the United States,
are
no
more
States
owing
allegiance
Su-
preme
Court,
20
Johns.,
693,
this
holding
was
Massachusetts,
as
has
of
Guadalupe-Hidalgo
it
the territory transferred
provision it
United
approved February
and
has
adopted
a
rule
fixing
the
status
of
freemen
by
the
bondage
of
the
mother.
No
above enumerated
was a white man
tribe, a citizen
by
which
the
make
State
constitution
residence
following
remarks
and
presents the
sever his
thereto, for
the purpose
not to
then
no
allegiance
is
attention of our Government
Many
heated
govern-
ments
it had no
white man
kee tribe
white man
in
not
intended
to
be
embraced
in
in the tribe and make himself
amenable
to
longing
to
their
the Government and
death
(168 U.
all
human
beings
persons born within
exist
in
or were
was
consequent
upon
the
sov-
ereign
State.
Slaves
and all
part to the
votes of free
at the
time for
our purchase
wording
ship
of
free
 
it
will
be
seen
the
squarely
really
be
male
citizens
of
and give their
opinion upon the
in
October,
1845.
The
court
declared
to the
this point is
said
Prior
to
the
pleased, but as the
effect that a free
time.
zens
privileges
the mass
entitled
to
ctizens. But this latter
which prohibited
The
to
all
citizens
of
judge continued
sense,
why
than
to
exclude
them
as
citizens
within
the
habeas
corpus,
as
citizens
regarded as our wards, and
for
is
personal
liberty.
The
reporter
universally conceded that the
any proper view
it
would
it would
have determined
need not take
sense is any
the
so-called
private
rights.
He
discussing whether
was an
Indian woman her
proviso
alluded
to,
whether
or
other
hand,
by
purposes
of
the white race,
mother,
and
not
the
quantum of Indian blood in the veins, determining the condition of
the
offspring.
rule, which
1,
title
4,
p.
the
civil law was, that one born of a free mother was free, although the
father was
a slave ;
mother was
no
doubt
that
the
rule
partus
sequitur
married an
Indian woman.
law of
the United
 
determine the
question. And the
the offspring of
the
father,
(1
Institutes,
198,
sec.
502
; 31
Barb.,
486
Roman civil
the ownership
citizens are in
people in
any
other
The law
of nations,
of
these
children
follow
the
This law
is
tribes
solved
was a
citizen of
the United
the Cherokee
the
Cherokee
Nation,
but
not
an
Indian
Union,
and
had refused
the latter
a Scotchman who emigrated to Canada and
there
married
one
Mar-
and. son, in
employment
with
a
corporation
which was
at Fort
George, now
Astoria, the
that
born
suit
Akin, 1842, 3
arrive at
the age
obtain
liberation.
All
were
liberated,
the status
of these
question concerns
United
alien. It
impression is
the plaintiff
It
therefore
followed
that
the
whether he might
by
an
Indian
that
he
was not
grow
as a
In Williams
v. Directors
and
the
children
plaintiff's children, therefore, are white within the
meaning
tion of tax and exclude
his
no more than
constitution
had
the
there were
white
within
Campbell, already dis-
somewhat
upon
this
Indian
allegiance
court
white and half
petitioner is not entitled to be
considered
a
white
man.
Indian
purchase is usually
of
Porto Kican
birth they
that were
almost identical,
seem to be on the question of birth,
it
fol-
lows
where
;
This question seems to
1884.
10
Kmg,
United States
point of what evidence
earliest
the
the United
be
in
1773,
be
implied,
as
it
may
her intention,
electing for
herself to
which allegiance
her,
we
are
marriage
as if
she had
had then
made it
allegiance
remains
choose
be
and
claim
be
her
father's
election
for
her
within
a
reason-
her
a
of
vice-chancellor
stated
no
definite
conclusion
American child
alien
parents,
(20
How.,
8),
Mr.
Justice
Nelson,
the question
into
the
territory
of
Mexico
therefore, is
been
interrupted
or
act
government, the burden
to
these
the
plaintiff
was
19
between 22
23 years
at
mature
years,
favor
at
read
that
jurisdiction
of
their birth, citizens
There
providing for the
right of inheritance
children
of
English
subjects,
were merely a declaration of the common law or were creative.
See
United
acting under the express authority of the Federal
statute,
v. Wallace,
States.
alien.
marriage were citizens
woman).
courts
citizen of the United
belongs,
under
the
contained a
dictum to
States. They had
plaintiff. The
came
of course, the two sons could
not
Moreover, if this had
not
brought
herself
within
the
in
moved
self had a
son. Son and
court held that the
Section
2.
Of
American
should be a subject,
allegiance beyond sea, no
as
the
of the doctrines
nor
a
new
rule
by
its
provisions,
father
by
a
foreign
subject.
And
father
was
pro-
longed,
was
the
inten-
a
foreign-born
citizen
found, but
several of
appeared that
to
their
citizenship.
providing
for
the
naturalization
were these
turn
upon
the
great
against
State
expressing
The question
the
force
of
founded on
the word
uniform and
not
be
recollected
rights
said,
except
by
an
act
which such person
was proscribed. Here we find that Congress has not only
circumscribed
the
exercise
of
its
not
be
power
of
naturalization,
either
by
own
taken the
 
argument
when that
this case
Hamilton as
32,
where,
1 Peters,
343, the
the point. Per
(1857),
of
opinion
does
not
of Mr.
its
as
a
member
of
by
the
of
the
rights
and
a
it pleased the
character of citizen, and endow him with all its rights. But character
of
the State and gave him no rights or
privileges in other
have
the
several
States
privileges
by
adopting
the
Constitution
of
the
;
such in one
privileges
and
stitution has
the
Constitution
(art.
1,
sec.
8)
bankruptcies
throughout
allegiance to
But
the
State
of
power of passing laws
on the subject of
an anomaly.
(see section
foreign
to
the
The
object,
then,
deprive them
as
and united
people, the
the
fold
of
citzenship
We therefore
the
mind,
governed
by
(Letter
to
be
under the
interminable
and
harassing
Papers,
712;
con-
trol
of
the
several
a
See
Congress on
March, 1789.
second session, ex
the
The authors of
In Stephens,
the
it
Govern-
ment.
me that the
become citizens.
power and Congress
it in any
other mode or
Congress
the
right
to
been held by
repugnancy
or
arose under the
uniform
speak
of
the
power
Constitution,
but
opposing counsel in the case did not
dispute it. For
in
power
of
the
this
to
be
that
the
natural
the public inter-
preventing the State
the exercise of such
nothing.
This,
then,
according
to
defendant, would
naturalization
in
the privileges
although the
admission is granted
grant to one State the right of over the other
States. They might contend
their
renounce
all
claim
to
the
same; but that they ought to be men of good moral
character, and
States, and,
in
the
United
States
for
a
afford
If there is
The
shall
out, because
the words
of those officers
earlier, in Ex
a clerk
up for
decision. In
to
by
mandamus
a clerk
ford
parte
Cregg.
peti-
tioner
(1891),
courts of
and
well-defined
duties.
It
order
to
frequently arisen.
In Ex
parte Gladhill
of record
within the
petitioner
good
behavior,
except
justices
of
the
peace,
years. There
is a
generally to
Section
6
principle
1
speaks of
would
which
statute.
The
had
some
purposes,
from
its
judgment.
Having
stated
this
by
the
court
of
marine
court
having certain
by statute
it
record.
declared by statute, and not
to
court,
we
of record.
hold
of record
for general and not special purposes was intended to be embraced. The act
has not declared that a court of record for some purposes
only
shall
be
invested
no
with the same power
the forms of writs
the peace
and when a
is
whether
or
meaning
of
the
statute.
As
set
out
will satisfy
the statute.
with
ref-
determined in discussing'
 
shall have
all the
It is
of Yonkers is
may exercise any
of the statute
and within its
of St.
powers
courts in
other
States, have power
to
enforce
private
rights
and
to
termed
County
was
in United
by express
statute; therefore,
courts
exer-
cising
these
tion within the meaning of the Federal statute. It would
seem
that,
it
it did
not possess
under the
authority of
appeals
in
cases
v.
McCabe,
1867,
44
111.,
194;
the
court
matters of naturalization
courts
in which
the State
of the
magis-
trates,
clear that, in
entertaining such proceedings,
(11
Jones
13
earlier
In
to
fol-
low the former. All these decisions were referred to in the
Supreme
Court
before the
did advert
such per-
jury, or
the notes below,
from which it
wich
the
question
Loney,
1889,
134
with
of duties
organization
of
courts and magistrates may,
by
ju-
dicial
powers on State courts we only mean that Congress can
not
entertain jurisdiction in any case or to perform any judicial
act.
But
we
do
not mean that Congress can not empower them to perform any judicial act
to
of
early
authorities,
con-
the doctrine is well founded that Congress can not com-
pel a State
naturalization
to
entirely
proper
and
within
the
supreme,
judicial,
and
with
it,
when
it
to
the
be
but the
con-
ferred
id..
33 );
Bond.,
389;
United
judicial determination
Yen Chang,
York
of the
 
of the natur-
No
alien
of his applica-
still
a
the act of Congress
of the 14th of April, 1802. He then resided in the
State
of
Pennsyl-
vania
naturalization under
first
condition
specified
admitted to
become a
was nothing the
naturalization acts that
during her widowhood.
In 1887 the
be taken at a private residence,
such having
been the
course pursued
a
Great
Britain.
In
declaring
made
a
public
not a feme sole, and that her husband is living
in England, and
arise on her application for
final
naturalization
papers,
whether
she
two countries;
absence,
a
experience
could
a
great
deal—
is
or
which
he
50,
Tit.
His
parents
lived
there,
and
while
a
the
chief
interests. He lost his residence here and
was,
up
about
1842,
of an intention
up
another.
enter upon the
White v.
nitely
expressed
provision
for
five
years.
the
Canada, to
take in
passengers, during
boat
of
1812,
said:
within the
1866,
1
Daly,
531,
been
reported,
unless,
indeed,
the
o
could not
ing of this
naturalization
The
object of the amendment of 1848 was to allow seamen who were
actually
United States, and
me
somewhat unique
naturalization,
five
to
and this
in
at
least
applied
for naturalization. In the act of 1795 this was increased
to
five
years.
period
to
fourteen
years,
or
the
volun-
without
any
previous
declaration
;
in
every
States in any competent court, and shall have served three
years on board
on his application
every
to
become
a
citizen
of
the
be deemed a
act
filing
of
his
declara-
tion
of
intention
to
become
such
citizen.
Revised Statutes
been
zation that
the applicant
the
merchant
1 Daly,
the
age of
vessel, and for seven
ployed as a
ing
those
city
of
to have
abandoned his
judge
by
territory of the na-
seas, and
the ter-
Its national character
if
vessels.
A
slightly
different
question,
remained
on
board
Philadephia. He was at the time of the trial still
employed on
citizenship
1882
he
become a citizen of the
United
the petitioner continued
have
a residence within
Pennsylvania as
entitled him
an
convenience
of
meeting
him
when
ice in
citizen,
naval
service.
See
also
in
which provided
upward, who has enlisted
United States Navy or Marine Corps, and has served, or
may
a
person
or
applicant
prove his
so
admitted.
And
the
residence
of the United
act of
The act of
 
of
1878,
shall
in
no
case
be
Sixth [with reference to
jurisdiction of
the jurisdiction of the
July
17,
1862,
with
least five
years continuously.
Tucker,
1802,
1
Cranch
C.
C,
89,
in
which
the
1802,
which
provided
the
oath of the
States
v.
Grottkau,
1887,
third section of
residence
application
to
forbidden
of the
and therefore that this
of
proof
in
In
re
An
Alien,
1845,
as
evidence
(Act of 22
or a
no court should
them
read,
as
evidence
to
respect to other matters,
but that
ex parte
The same view
must
also
* *
*
the
upon the
dered
court in In
as to the man's
the certificate
the
applicant
was
entitled
to
naturalization
residence.
the
1868,
1
Brewster,
263,
he
was
could
person
who
and
voucher
admitted
the
court said
But it
is obvious,
testi-
compensation appears
as a
year
at
least.
(b)
into the
country for those both beyond the age of 21 years and
those
within
the age of twenty-one
who shall have continued
reside
therein
to
the
resided five
years within
that the
attaining
majority
before
he
could
re Hawley,
6
years
old,
in
whom he resided until
there
three
that this absence had
broken in upon his
States, including the
his
application
should
be
 
the
Con-
Man,
1881,
6
Utah,
259,
as
to
the United States,
raised was not
language was not fitted to exercise
the
In re Rodriguez,
elabo-
or not the Mexican's
court
finally
within
the
that language)
ignorant is
requirement
were
suggested
attachment
to
republican
in
this
language
Upon
general
surety—is defined
manner in
of
good
be
allowed
to
Ex
it
prevents
any
of
upon
conviction
from
attaching
; if
the
man,
and
the
same
Most, the great
The report
of the
the
principles
of
the
 
to
as air and water, socialists demanded
the forced
by the citizens in
ernment
for
the
point
out
to
(1)
As
to
other
San Fran-
to
carry
party.
To
After
a
considerable
discussion
taken before him
well as
only locality which
natural-
ization
or
building
without
circumstances,
the heading
re
Boso,
ceremony.
In
Kichards
prema-
turely,
confused
with
the
question
of
necessity
proof of
his bona fide
Fronascone, supra, the
make
This would seem
case, but that
In
In
re
Randall,
1880,
14
Phila.,
224,
must be
tion to
that
this
formality
only
Baird
unauthorized
of
conditions
the
alien
took.
A
directly
opposite
result
was
be viewed from
reference to the descent
of
the
that such should
treaty provisions.
by our
treaties with
Mexico that
American citizens.
The courts
establish
the
proposition
that
declaration
of
principle.
One
of
that
declaration
of
intention,
but
out
his
naturalization
residence
has
J.,
took
occasion
to
express
his
state-
ments
facts and
believe
As
to
proceedings
were
the
that he has resided
to be
the allegiance
a
citizen
of
the
United
States.
The
the oath
the same provision
acts
down
in
be
thus
sworn
to
consist
of
to
defend
the
Constitution
of
and
forms,
as
will
be
proved
to be
supra, in which
above
the burden then rests upon the petitioner to establish its
material
specified by
has
been
frequently
the
right
to
the
validity
and
sufficiency
of
defendant's
alleged
naturalization
a
not
fact, such as holding an office of which citizens alone
were
capable,
or
which
v. Fenwick,
of
the
such
part
received
degree
U. S., 773,
to show
time
acquired
the
property,
the
residence,
the
applicant
naturalization),
the
1880,
not
show
facts
this jurisdiction,
facts.
been no more
decision
on
other
sufficient. In matter
lost
lapse
of
naturali-
tion.
Other
decisions
are
Kurtz,
1876,
94
U.
record have
that
any
that
and
many,
;
and
having
in
all
things
complied
with the law in such case made and provided, the said James
M.
of
naturalization.
[l.
s.]
Jno.
F.
prima
facie
conclusive,
ling,
1856,
which had been
which
Hong Yen Chang,
cited, In
where the powers are special.
And see
additional points
down that
North
Noonday
Mining
proved
by
1891,
impeached
they
do
not
record.
However,
ment
will
and
concerned
that
their
relations
such an action. The
was
already
set
forth,
of
pro-
oath.
And
State can not impeach
the dicta of
It
directly
against
such a conclusion. The dicta, of the above cases, to
the effect
might
act,
would
seem
entirely
sound.
Private
parties
have
attempted
to
impeach
passed
upon
refused
holding where
strictly
holding
the
contested
1860,
received
and
the
issuance
of
tance : In
admitted to
or not State
must be
grant
of
determine
the
cause,
consisted in false affidavits, the papers were revoked. It seems
logical
extrajudicial,
defendant
and the question
proceedings
in
which
citizenship
may
at issue were
a
next of kin?
citizenship
of
grand
properly raised
Hollingsworth
v.
Duane,
1801,
Wall
way in which it
Catlett
Cole,
1864,
17
Wis.,
674,
examine into the
citizenship of one of the judges of an election in a
contested election case.
In
re
Yamashita,
1902,
ship.
naturalization
exists
or
Section
8.
Effect
of
naturalization.
Naturalization
v.
Fitzgerald,
1870,
3
Oreg.,
568,
583),
341
made
to
rights
of,
a
native.
TLe
to
prescribe
a
uniform
up
and,
a native might sue. He is distin-
guishable
himself thus
put in
others.
As
has
Under
circumstances
somewhat
same
conditions
but
this
It
considerable
importance.
case in question,
to whether or not naturalization
has
this
1841,
descent,
what
are cases
where the
alien had
acquired lands
way he ha,d no estate or
title
to
be
con-
alien, though he
that
under
the
States,
may
1878,
FATHER'S
NATURALIZATION.
It has been from the first clear, under these statutes, that
a
minor
decree of the
1830. The court held
had
treaty of
of
the
naturalization
act
of
April,
1S02.
be
States.
statute meant
that whenever
the child
the
war
upon
in
and
in
upon the effect
Court of the
England, and
after his emigration to this country in 1823. He was
naturalized in
with him
claimed
and
not
inherit
from
United
as to the
in
the
two
yet a
wards
to cover all
the
fact that the father's
be
any
differ-
ent
be
all
the
courts
used
time
of
majority?
accordance with
territory and
Great
infra.)
it
did
was
naturalized;
voting.
The
the
took
the
oath
of
a
which provided for the naturalizing
of
previous to
by the
become
citizens
it appeared that the father of the child in question
had
been
ginia in
children
citizens
by
referred to. The
the
without
or not
ship on
seem to be no
of an alien
the cases
to a
become
a
citizen
by
force
alone
of
her
marriage'
with
a
naturalized
citizen
1888,
125
111.,
141,
197,
198.
reputed father)
His
he may
whose wife
was his
John
Ruckle
is
his
family when his
that,
by
virtue
she was
was
dower. In
by
Cowen,
J.,
said:
We
do
was incapable
capacity
of
her
husband.
Two
the
until the summer of
sold
by
al.
v.
Dupont
et
seventh and
natural-born
subject.
H.
Doc.
326,
59-2
10
expatriation
by
that the wife
had
before
it
the
case
of the wife
 
herself
temporarily,
and
as
a
wife,
to
the
dominion
one of
husband.
This
she
had.
In
Leonard
and there-
so
unusual
and
singular
sense, conferred
nature
intended to confer
1994,
Rev.
Stat.,
a
dower, being
America,
the
two
court said
with
him
country of his adoption.
sought
herself
are
of
to
a
at
fers,
under
construction
which
would
zens would
the necessity
1880,
80
It is not the ceremony
of
is the fact
citizen that
makes the
circumstance
to be a
difference whether
the marriage
to prove that two
of
the
ject
had forever
(b)
A
NONRESIDENT
FOREIGNER.
woman
married
under a
take
Britain,
but
Whether,
indeed,
discussed before the Supreme Court
of the United States, it has
never,
I
believe,
such a contingency,
subject.
a native
born American
1855 became
(see Chapter
in the
of the
United States
to the Union as the
State
who were resident in it and who exercised certain political
and
civil
rights.
The
court
by the admis-
the
adopted
By
the
and
immunities
of
citizens
in
the
give
citizens
1856,
19
How.,
393,
525.
The
principle
limited
in
State
v.
Brimrose,
1842,
time
its
citizens
must
become
of
they
can
become
citizens
but
Texas occupied
manner in
aliens might
to
the
laws
of
sovereign State
politi-
those
this
a mere
military occupation,
by
the
treaty,
ceded
territory
becomes
new
master
shall
the government
and the
remains in
question as to the status of peoples residing in territory
ceded
For
Spain:
American
Insurance
Co.
v.
Canter,
1828,
1
Pet.,
511 ;
Tannis
to
On the
Primrose,
supra.
The
two
cases
already
of
New
Orleans
United
States
by
admission
or
inhabitant
decision of the
of the ceded territory who did not, within* a specified
time, declare
they
until
Murphy v. Ramsey, supra.
right
citizens of theUnited States. In
re Rodriguez, supra
inhabitants
sulted in each case
White
v.
Burnley,
1857,
20
remain as eligible as
members of
the society
people.
gradually banish the painful
by
force
governed as a
upon him
in cases
1866,
United
States,
of
or
rights to become
they
have
consequently have insisted that in order for
it to
find-
the convicted
Brigantine,
1794,
Bee,
the right
what
we
thus
hold
which
he
is
dently
his situation elsewhere,
much less when
another, are
as
impose dangerous restraints upon it, and, of
course,
it
man's
will
and
manner
circuit
courts
in
by
recognized.
It
been restrained.
be
noted,
the
right
of
expatriation
in
the
circuit
zens in
all people,
indispensable to
Government has freely
thereof
and consequently
been pronounced
upon. The
number of
the
and
inter-
subject,
complying
fully
with
the
conditions
of
to
have
the
government
renounced.
Congress.
by
on the
States
as is accorded to
citizens shall
by
Congress
in
precisely
by
direct
seems sound,
oath
of
allegiance
evidence
quitting
this
country,
could
any
know
nothing
so
to
think, would follow in
respect to rights of
countries.
If
and
if
more
strongly
the
with
oath of
con-
permanent resi-
dent. And
its
revolu-
not only that he had himself
become
a
citizen
but
that
point that
The
court
held
that
to
an
act
of
expatria-
v.
McCarty.
1874,
as
act was
forfeited
at
bar,
foreign
he should
punishment
yet it
certainly places
allegiance, and
fide
property
of her
court
Derby,
1858,
30
Vt.,
718,
where
the
question
upon the animus of
1 Sandf.
Ch., 583,
citizenship. And
it
decision an
treaty, a
country, until
until
he
naturalization
reached in another case, almost as
strong,
Halspy
where
he
married
and
residence
in
a
busi-
Frances,
1813,
be
expatriation
subject
denationalized
the
distin-
guished
by
the
court) ,
that mar-
sufficient
importance
the
upon
his
(of
that port affords a presump-
tion),
he
became
an
emigration
In
Stoughton
v.
a
foreign
remarked that there
the
defendant
Gov-
that upon the
circum-
stances
it
can
temporarily
be
view
to
think
that even here
this r§turn to the service of his native country must
be
consid-
ered
an
citizenship.
the period of
the revolutionary struggle)
continue
upon the death
before his
has
been
expressed
 
relationship
if he
:
establish an uniform rule of naturalization ; and to repeal the
act
heretofore
passed
a
free
white
person,
may
court of some of the states, or of the territories
northwest
Ohio, or
potentate, state or sovereignty
whereof
within
state
at
least
to
every
;
happiness
to the
Sec.
further
be
admitted
to
or
has resided
least,
sovereignty,
whereof
he
was
before
a
said
the orders
proviso
to
be
the
citi-
in
the
United
time held, five years, at
least, besides
conforming to
trary
hereof
notwithstanding:
Provided,
upon his
nation or
shall
be
has been,
there shall
each report and
for every
by the making
or requiring the
same, respectively. And
the clerk of
made, as aforesaid,
person authorized
former
might
do.
And
the
aliens registered and returned,
to
two
dollars
the
peace
and
good
behaviour
during
States, or for such term as the justice
or other magistrate shall deem reasonable, and until a
report and registry of such
alien
received
as
alien
shall
and
may
be
committed,
to
be
performed.
such minor
passing
of
this
act,
the
time
by
applica-
tion
shall
and
of some
de-
and that he doth absolutely
and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance
and
fidelity
to
year at
least ; and
a
man
happiness
to
the said twenty-ninth
day of January,
compliance
may
arrive
in
the
United
if
of
or
aliens
States, or of
either of the
migrated, and
the place
and registry
family,
this
the passing of this
the
time
of
a seal
and clerk
or prothonotary,
naturalized in any
rights
and
privileges,
of
ized under any of the laws
of
the
government of the United States,
may
have
become
citizens
of
under the age of twenty-one
years,
be
not
'descend
to
persons
whose
fathers
have
citizen,
jurisdiction of
jurisdiction of
first section
in the first
directions
prescribed
in
naturalized,
the
widow
and
the
children
the
time
when
this
at any time
belong,
every
such
person
shall
be
deemed
and
adjudged
guilty
naturalization.
the limits
be
entitled
to
to repeal the
of the
the
jurisdiction
of
the
thousand
the limits
and under
the jurisdiction
of the
the place
as aforesaid,
act
to
establish
an
uniform
passed on that
have resided in the
at the
age of
twenty-one years,
years within the
his
minority,
be
condition
of
for
three
years
next preceding, it has been the bona fide intention of such
alien
to
become
a
citizen
of
act
relative
to
evi-
regulation
of
Seamen
on
board
the
public
and
private
Be
any alien,
and
and furnish
;
or involuntary servi-
States, to
make and
enforce contracts,
inherit,
property,
and
the
security
of
person
and
property,
as
Crimes against
Be it enacted
virtue of any act
under such
acts or
shall
upon
admitted
a
counterfeit,
or
ante-dated,
or
been
procured
by
fraud,
or
otherwise
unlawfully
obtained
terfeit
certificate
of
by
the
or
by
affidavit,
knowingly
deny
intent
to
evade
or
avoid
any
duty
or
liability
imposed
thereof,
shall
than
one
dollars nor
than one thousand dollars, or both such punishments may be
imposed,
and intentionally
act
hereby
made
or
to
to
be
Sec. 3. And
be, procured
by
States, without having been
be
deemed
due
district
or
voting
precinct
in
;
and [any] statement
doing
any
of
year.
enacted,
That
United
States
a
citizen
of
the
be deemed a citi-
citizen.
* * -i:
made
by
an
alien
in said
oath,
before
a
circuit
or
district
court
of
the
United
of the same
any hereditary title, or
been of any of the orders of nobility in the kingdom or
state from
to
the
be
jurisdiction
of
seven hundred and ninety-five,
has resided
the
State
or
Territory
support
the Constitution of the United States, and that he absolutely and entirely
renounces and
to
citizen
or
subject
during
to the Con-
the
to
of
moreover,
performed in
the court,
the jurisdic-
made
any
the court, that
jurisdiction
of
the
United
States
twelve, and
applicant
United States,
application, must
States of
be
considered
as
rights and privileges
aliens [being free white
continued
the
the
time
of
day made a declaration,
according to law, of
naturalization
naturalization
as citizens
of the
such
person
was
proscribed.
i
Error
in
have
of
his
declaration
of
intention
United
Vol.
XXII,
p.
61.)
CHAr.
for other purposes.
Corps, and
or
may
hereafter
previous declaration
Navy,
or
Marine
Corps.
to
member
or opposition
officer
or
of
of
his
or be
made a citizen of the United States. All courts and tribunals and
all
judges
approval hereof.
Approved, March
uniform rule for
the naturalization of
aliens throughout the
designation
of
the
Bureau
of
Im-
Commerce and Labor
Bureau, under
of
Commerce
and
Labor,
shall
be
the
duty
various immigration
alien, and,
of
Commerce
said
before the
deputy, in the
his admission, and
renounce
forever
age,
occupation, personal description, place of birth, last foreign residence and
allegiance,
the
which
file,
in
residence
(by
street
and
number,
citizen of the
his wife and, if
organ-
ized
credible
wit-
nesses,
who
allegi-
time he has
residence,
moral
his intention to become
by
complying
with
the
the court
public and
conspicuous place
in his office,
or in the building in which his office is situated, under an appropriate
heading,
the
to
be
produced
witnesses may
be summoned.
term
but
further,
shall
make
homestead
petition
final
hearing
of
and
in
has not
resided in
the State,
and at
the hearing,
State,
provided
that
it
portion
of
his
reside.
Sec.
the
witnesses
citizenship, and shall have the right to call witnesses, produce
evidence,
and
be
the Bureau
be the duty of
clays
after
the
Bureau dupli-
cates of
issued
out
of
said
court
affecting
or
his direction
may
be
or
be
recovered
admission
as
a
citizen
of
the
United
dollars
a
sum of
request
a
subpoena,
and
upon
for
such
shall
be
returned
by
shall
be
accounted
said
Bureau
as
in
case
of
other
fees
to
provisions
exercising jurisdiction in naturalization
may be
required in
of any
year,
of
citizenship
upon
knowingly
or counterfeiting any certificate
the intent that the same
may be
plate
in
the
printing of
except
under
officer,
and
metallic
plate
engraved
intent
possession
a
distinctive
paper
which
has
same,
shall
be
by
to
issue
or
be
blank
certificate
of
render
true
accounts
of
moneys
dollars,
more than five
secure
naturalization,
or
to
file
the
preliminary
years,
or
both.
arising
under
the
provisions
of
information
is
purpose
of
tbf>
prosecution
of
inconsistent
with
or
repugnant
ings to which
polyga-
niist
nor
America and
name,
date,
of residence of each of
said
member of or
of the
United States,
become a citizen of the United States and
to
renounce
to
any
foreign
particularly to
intention to reside
since
of
for
,
to
wit, ,
and
the
removed.
this
Depart-
that
,
nineteen
hun-
effect
and after, ninety
:
and after the
law
and
equity,
2. Declarations
be used
the time of making such
declarations,
preliminary
to
to file
new declarations
furnishing proof,
effect.
naturalization
of
Commerce and Labor
holds
sessions
at
different
or the
one clerk
declarations
declarations
of
intention
or
certificates
of
naturalization
or
destroyed
destruction.
The
clerk
shall
forward
and
no
court issues, in accordance
of
naturalization
(Form
2207),
upon
declaration,
showing the
there-
unable to speak, that
tion
(Division
of
Naturalization),
been denied
naturalization, and
places
on
the
various
States
Navy
course
of
action
Naturalization.
Bureau
of
before taking
rights
as
if
he
by
the
countries, and [is]
general
which they
of the
full
extent.
of
the
nation
all
nized
have been
which extra-
nationalities
having
unity
in
relation
unity
when
examined
by
itself
to
preserve
their
nationality
reversion to the
Stowell,
between
Christian
and
Mohammedan.
The
cry
on
originally an officer of
we
of
extraterritoriality
country
mei1
relation
country,
and
to
that
with
Turkey
prior
been previously
municipal
control
relations.
schools
their
have
schools
of
the system
whatever they might have been,
could not,
extraterritoriality in its origin
Levant, and specially in its development after the Moslem conquest,
implied no inferiority on
were
immiscible
and
equalty
despising
the
or
acts of Parliament ; it has never been the habit of those engaged
in
diplo-
macy
to
in
construing
we
ought
to
look
at
ascertain what
all
circumstances
objects
sought
American
conferred
by
upon
are the
retained
barous,
unorganized,
international
4088.)
territoriality,
general
statements
subject against a subject.
foreigner.
founded a
foreign
Christians.
5.
arrange-
ment
introduced
France,
and
Russia,
the
legations
of
subjects alone are concerned. It
is admitted
where a British subject on
the one hand,
and a native
of
the territory or a subject of a third power on the
other,
are
pursuit
by
in the court
and
foreign
Christians,
tice in Turkey
action
is
by
English
tion
of
the
respective
by an
Italian are
to be
found declared
must
countries
of the same kind and degree of civilization can not suffice in countries
of
a civilization different in itself, and, from the point of view of
the Western
nations,
of inferior quality. In saying this all has been said which
for
practical
go
beyond
the
diction
exercised
by
the
two
treaties
coferring
determined
a
No
enter
into
the
of Forbes v.
who are
intercourse
was
to
.supposed
had commit-
ted a
felony there
purpose of investing the
aspect
the
American
of extra-
or the
pens, Turkey
full
inter-
change
the
who
 
Europe
or
America.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
the
claims
of
noticed
later,
there
is
of
any
to assistants
or guards
in legations
of
crimi-
entitled
to
regards
seamen
in
this
respect
with
protective
jurisdiction.
England
gives
equal
stitutional
sense
of
are
thereof,
and
are
correspondence
of
the
of
the
denial
with
certain
ecclesiastical
 
R.,
1897,
p.
article
It follows naturally
definite inten-
of persons
equal
to
that
of
upon
origin
is
met
by
a
like
from
a
America,
gin,
were claimed as a citizen by the country of his origin.
In the
recognition than
be
the
same
protection
be
Persia. The
formal
authorization
acquisition of
naturally
depend
in
:
China or
torial
countries
the
American
dragoman
(See
Mr.
Terrell
to
Mr.
have been
question at the
self
of
peculiarities affecting expatriation in
distinction above
regarded by
other nations
Ameri-
doctrine,
even
under
the
British
naturalization
all
countries
in
which
the
such
sincerely and bona
self-expatriation.
But
if,
instead
of
this,
he
permanently
withdraws
himself
out
children in
citizen, the father
grandchild of a
a
con-
through
their
Turkey herself,
Revised
Statutes,
coupled
with
our
treaty
of
as
the aforesaid
and
not
be obliged
American,
by
birth
and
feelings,
habits
of
obliterate their
Department considers
as citizens
refused to
their origin,
United
States
exercises
extraterritoriality.
This
naturalized
in
returned to his native
between
the
United
to
the
rules
established
by
the
laws
living in
countries in
a country in which the United
States exercises extraterritorial jurisdiction
zenship
down
not become subjects
long
as
their
pursuits
1993
of
the
Revised
Statutes
of
the
 
may
be
shown with
for French withdrawal
of
it
from
1904
is subject in
spheres of influence
and
ONCE POSSESSED
—In 1830 jurisdiction in Algiers ceased the military
occupation of that country by France, which subsequently developed
into annexation. (Hinckley
Japan by the
treaties of June
vision
of November
1903,
pp.
a treaty with the
rogatives with extraordinary detail. Since 1896 Madagascar
has
38;
see
ciation of extraterritoriality. It has, however, presumably been
relin-
p.
183.)
Samoa.
entire group
and
of February
his
decisions
it
shall
or wound
not be answerable
sea-
men,
the
Art. XVIII. If any of the citizens of the United
States, or
each
other,
from
to him. And
if any dispute
nation,
having
of the respective
wound a
Tripoline, or, on the contrary, if a Tripoline shall kill or wound
a
the law of
not
be
Porte,
will
be
appointed
to
or may
Siam, the conduct of
of
violations
Any
disputes
arising
between
be
sul,
in
conjunction
Siamese; neither will
the Siamese authorities
order
to
the
pre-
vention
of
all
controversy
regulated by the authorities
of the appro-
of either
arms to the injury of
others,
the two
premises.
X.
China.
Treaty
of
June
18,
1858.
Art.
XI.
being
will
with
and enjoy for themselves
China guilty
of the
either on shore or in any merchant vessel, who may
insult,
trouble,
pun-
Chinese
or
commit
China.
and subjects
shall
be
tried
by
due to his
watching the
proceedings in
cross-examine witnesses. If
he is dissatisfied
all
United
States
residing
in
the
province
of the
most favored
citizen
of the other, his
in
business
merchant-vessel, who
Chosen,
shall
be
according
to
When
between citizens
be
proper official
with
all
proper
facilities
for
watching
the
If
the high
right of ex-
most
favored
most
favored
nation.
Exhibit
D.
Frelinghuysen to Hon. William
Senate
between
Ottoman
Porte,
treaty,
whether
only:
(1)
Where
those
laws
authority
conferred
by
the
statute;
(2)
has
authority
of June
to
and in civil cases where the matter in dispute exceeded
$2,500
exclusive
of
provisions
States into
States
at
of
the
colonies
before
common law has
: What
common
law ?
The
common
law
when the
Or
the
com-
mon
important
in
20, 1876.]
are
not
under-
stood
the
jurisdiction
of the
China,
&c,
sul
by
the
to
make
rights existing between
existing
CONSULAR REGULATIONS.
627. Power
authority of
thereto;
authority
into
execution.
contract
at
and
ports
ar
United
States,
of
the
United
States,
which
terms
of
the
provisions
for trial
of offenses
hundred dollars,
or the
dollars, or the
may take the
upon
Sec. 4090.
Capital cases
offenses
whero
allowed jurisdiction
of the
United States
from enlisting
power
by
a
is reach.
dred and
which may come
Title,
and
to
issue
ferred upon
any
case
for upon
as the
district of California, and
of
minister to
circuit court,
as provided
may
appeal
therefrom
appeal
shall
not
proceedings,
unless
the
minister
certi-
fies
that
provided
for
in
this
shall be
in all such
ministers
and
judgment
shall
confided to them by treaty, and on their part to
do
are
contained,
and
be made. It shall, however, be the duty of such
officer
to
neglects
consent
of
the
government of
subvert the same, and
and
the
shall
be
lawful
to
convict
one
put
upon
Sec.
consuls
is
appointed,
jurisdiction
him
upon the record his
the consul,
by
such
of his
office, shall
copy
suit
same,
to
give
the same effect
est factum, verified upon
or
minister
trying
and
be
directed
to
and
be
appointed
respec-
tively,
prescribe the
time of returning
be
allowed
this Title
into effect,
this
be
consulted
with-
out
prejudicial
binding and
prison
shall
be
of the
used
as
a
prison
and for
the care
of offenders,
not to exceed five thousand dollars a year ; and to
allow,
constables and
the care
dollars
consul at Kanagawa, the
ports
in
of offenders,
therein,
who
are
hereby
ex
and also
for the
to Persia, in
United
duty
of
istered. All suits
foreign powers,
such
regulations
the United States for
the time being, and the ministers of such foreign powers,
respectively,
to
time
are in
the
Muscat, respectively,
by
the
consuls appointed by the United States to reside therein, who
are hereby
ex officio
delegated
to reside
the
States
and
this
section,
and
in
accordance
the
countries
therein
named,
shall
extend
hereafter
enter
into
treaty
relations.
Sec.
exercised
said
jurisdiction
ses-
sions
also hold sessions
at the cities
manner
appeal
to
the
United
States
court
for
China
Provided,
also,
of the
sion
of
the
effects
of
such
effects,
and
shall
as
decedent,
so
far
as
known,
estate
with-
out
first
reporting
the
to give such
his duties in
or decrees
class
of
cases
as
those
in
which
the
same
shall
writs
be exercised in con-
laws
of
the
United
States
now
in
force
United States
necessary
of
the
said
United
States
to said
the President.
C.
;
See supra,
for other countries
17,
three classes, viz:
:
tract, comprising all cases of contract or debt ; wrong, when damages
are claimed
is
claimed.
3.
In
contract,
demanded.
4.
The
petitioner
reasonable
order notice on the
order,
and
the
consul
shall
compel
14.
15. For
to
serious
depreciation
directly
Petitioner
shall
be
notified
to
must
be
inserted
ceases.
Process
against
property
demand.
30.
If
petitioner
recovers
judgment
the
consul
shall
require
responsible
sureties,
for
to
be
replevied,
the sight
at
his
only
upon
sufficient
41.
Within
five
shall
a
43. Within
of
any
American
citizen
45. Upon
writing
imprisoned, or
the
consul may issue his writ of habeas
corpus,
custody or
under his
be
determined
to
as he
to his
wife, or
pay into
court, a
previous decrees, according
may find
rules in
justice, humanity,
the
consul's
port.
a
by the
the fine
to
bail
within
made, at
two sureties
his
expenses.
71.
Any
give
accused; and every
States, shall be so required, unless in the consul's
opinion
justice
will
when
in intention,
is manifest,
the word
or prosecutor for
or for any
of all prose-
or con-
the witness
gious belief.
the
pains
and
of the
consulate or
the minister
the
docket,
with
the
parties'
names,
the
nature
of filing
83.
Civil
actions
based
fees.
90.
be
to
pay.
to a
should
be
re-
quired
practicable
dispatch
is
a more limited con-
consul.
punishing sum-
marily any
any refusal to
$50
and
costs.
96.
Every
party
States
currency
shall be
to
hereby annulled, and those
effect; and the
hitherto lawfully
inconsistent
herewith.
the
district
in
China
against
a
America who may
to issue
district
the
accused
may
be
he'
Turkey, and
14,
to the
appellate jurisdiction
and
Gen.,
China
Gen., 250-2,
run from
nary
to
522-4,
Feb.
4,
jurisdiction
•of
377-81,
Aug.
14,
pris-
Banks?;. Walker
Barney *. Baltimore City
Abb. Pr.,
(1876)
Currins.
Finn
(1846),
3
Denio,
229
149
Dales.
Irwin
(1875),
137
Jackson*. Goodall
562,
607 -
47
Leng
Y.
253
Page.
North
Noonday
Mining
Co.
68
Petersons. State (Texas),
(1875),
92
U.
S.,
733
53
In
States. Cole
61
Fed.,
382.
44,
47,
74,
77,
82,
84
(1888),
36
Fed.,
437
74
Zachariev.
Godfrey
(1869),
99
Am.
Dec,
506
45
various
of
the
or
domiciled
therein, except the children of transient aliens
and
Save the clause
citizens
thereof.
(Stats.
(1894),
sec.
60.)
In
Virginia
in
United
States
a
right
to
citizenship
the
children, shall be
fixed
home
averment of citizenship
v.
Overman,
18
How.,
137;
Robertson
v.
Cease,
97
U.
S.,
646;
to be
his domicil
such
words,
the
removal
or
temporary
purpose,
and
to
which
he
ETC. 259
somewhere;
and
2,
that
time. Every
one has
have
a
domicil.
ernment
some
and
can
hold
citizenship
Shaw,
present
intention
of
removing
an intent.
order
Lo
to
have
such
intention.
of
to
show
that
or
business.
Tuttle
y.
Wood
(1902),
115
removal
residence. California, Polit.
following
pro-
vision
two
where he resides, or
record,
shall, from
time of such departure, be considered as having exercised his
right
years of
with a foreign
power.
(Civil
Code
(1895),
sees.
1805-7.)
principle
that
country
sine
animo
revertendi,
has
no
application
. as
between
the
Tiffin
(1848),
6
How.,
individual.
»
(1893)
(1868)
1,
months),
Const,
it was said
of its
of citi-
2).
On the other hand, it has been decided in the circuit
court of appeals
has
merely
and county
can make the subject
same
rights
as
citizens.
In
people,
residence.
3.
A
un-
no rights
Texas
(Rev.
protect
them
in
the
full
enjoyment
of
the
lights,
such
citizenship.
expatriation, with
country not
declaration or avowal
renunciation
of
all
citizen
and his
are the
office
unless
disqualified
to
testify
Sec.
1809
(1655).
Exercise
thereof.—
All
citizens
maturity to
from birth or from
to
civil
functions
as
are
confined
by
law
States,
are
a
residence.
In
determining
the
are to be observed:
1. It is the place where one remains when not called
elsewhere for labor or
lost until another
death the resi-
dence of the
of
the
the wife.
a
parent
living,
can
not
be
guardian.
7.
The residence can be changed only by the union of act and
intent.
2.
Aliens.
Sec.
elector,
except
of
father during
she
husband is
presumptively the
to
he is an elector,
not an elector,
holding and
as a citizen of
and
and shall
regards this
being twenty-one
the
citizen
of
or
subject
of
a
State,
a
the laws and practice regarding citizenship, expatriation,
and pro-
that country is
all
the
rights,
privileges,
all
the
but the
it on
the strength
of services
defense
conformity
service or
not during
from the date
ing
naturalization
and
citizenship,
3. Persons who
are born in the legations and on the warships of the
Republic.
Plata
Argentines.
part
in
any
already established or which
real estate therein.
education or industry.
Art. 3. The
born in a
papers
the
national
guard
is naturalized in
attained
enjoy
all
the
political
rights is acquired
by virtue of
by
virtue
by an uninterrupted
this period.
acquire
Austrian
citizenship
in
order
conduct
or
way
of
thinking. —
Jhfd.
acquired
by
the
possession
of
an
alien.
a
Text
as
printed
in
Parliamentary
Papers,
Misc.
subject.
NATURALIZATION.
according to the
required,
nationality
shall
be
properly
town
make
it
necessary,
make
then
submit
§§
and Fiume
shall be
his naturalization.
summoned
to
summons, the certificate of
and
Fiume,
and
by
the
Croatian-Slavonian-Dalmatian
purposes of record.
or
the
supplementary
reserve,
bodies, but are not
giance
if
age,
to
has
not
to
acquire
Such
persons
communicated to
the
State or communal
to
which
liberated
certificate
§
regard
to
such
persons,
belonging
to
any
parish
consent
taken
up such
the
Hungarian
Crown
with
the
Hungarian
subject,
and
to
those
of
his
of the Hun-
by
marriage has
become invali-
foreign
nationality,
of the Hungarian Crown. In
this
member of any
judicially separated
approval of
laws of
if
he
person
to
be
become
members
of
the
legislature,
does
by
in force on
law.
living within the
which this
foreign nationality.
day
on
which
2,
a
without
may
always
French national-
themselves thereof
to
political
rights
determine
what,
equality with a Belgian for the exercise of political rights.
Art. 133.
following
the
attainment
the
woman
 
It may also
who
shall
have
The
consent
as
the declaration
family
shall
drawn
up
3
to her children
plication therefor
is made
proposition
by
the
Government
having
the
same
object,
shall
the
whether it is
Art. 8. The
sent himself
before the
register kept for this
municipal authorities shall
Art. 11. The
of which shall
a
April
1,
1879,
shall
apply
to
him,
as
well
as
to
AUGUST
2,
1906.
[Translation.]
In
observed
that
the
Belgian
formal
renun-
reply
ing
be
shown
by
left
No
restriction
is
officials
of
up as registers
consular post
his
or divorced),
his father
consular
be free of
are alone
subject to
the
information
contained
in
drawing
up
these
certificates.
Blank
form.
SPECIAL
DECLABATTON.
naturalization
certificates,
acquired according
to the
possess corroborative
and the circumstances
Belgian
nation-
ality.
Vilain
a declaration,
the register. Should
inquiries
of
purely optional character
the
notice
which
my
I
shall
be
obliged
Mr.
Minister:
In
reply
instant, in which
Article 31.
The following
these
are
Bolivians
the
the
income
of
two
hundred
of
the
naturalized
Griscom,
ambassador
to
Brazil,
October
13,
1906.]
The
minister
for
foreign
affairs
foreign
countries.
like
affidavit
up
had accepted.
diplomatic
channels.
Sec.
3. In either case the Executive, to whom a copy of the
affidavit
signed
before
residence in
not
Sec.
be
determined
by
a
federal
statute.
Chile,
constitution
(1833).
[Translation.]
Art.
5
(6).
of Chileans,
born in
3.
Prosecution
following causes:
16,
1906.]
Ministers
of
15,
1906.
[Translation.]
we received
a note
from His
by
cir-
cular
from
no provisions
touching the
with
a
view
to
the
inform
your excel-
Prince
native, or, in
become domiciled
and
as
Colombians
before
the
municipal
authorities
with the laws.
war against Colom-
practice some
profession, art,
citizens.
Article
16.
service
faction which
exercise all
the
territory
Rican
father
foreign father
Ricans,
or
who
settled
its annexation
are:
fore enacted.
having
in
the place of its birth.
(3)
The
mother, recognized by
father.
(4)
A
child born or found within the territory of the Republic, its
parents or
manently
instance of their
Costa Rican
ship according to the
mili-
preserves
has
given
up
foreign government.
to become naturalized.
in
the
civil
register
husband
dur-
and
purposes
favorable
to
it
law
is
ipse
amine
three
or
the
years,
unless
such
residence
or unless it be
to the
subject to any liabili-
but
they
shall
be
contribute toward
public expenses
and respect
by
case of a
willful
be
voted
for,
for
any
office
right
of
petition
in
this
kind
of
matters.
Article
18.
Foreigners
are
of
property
and
the
preservation
of
far
as
they
the
San
Josg,
30, 1902,
citizen-
ship
government in
agents,
or
of their property
nor
to
their
privileges
the
is
restrained,
said
Herewith
honor
one
copy
each of the Gazette, dated the 7th and 27th of November,
1902,
mentioned, and
of
the
Republic.
:
obtained
their
majority.
on
in
the
proper
registers
prior
to
1835, en-
tered into
father and
291,
November
13,
1902.
which
section of
citizenship of
provisions
sections
before
3. The
be
of
well as the
with
the
certificates
of
of
place,
a
certificate
be
imposed
inscribed
as
Cuban
citizens,
Article 6.
In order
to be
article
of the
constitution refers
their place of
have not
been registered
the pro-
of
Spaniards
of
civil
status,
the
witnesses
or
the
this
island.
The
there
those that may have made in
the
registry
of
civil
148.
Be
sanctioned the following
30, 1902,
November
Wherefore I
1902.
T.
Department
of
State.
declaring them to be
citizenship
by
article
6
right
to
should
be
taken
at
the
time
of
soliciting
the
certificate
of
nationality
compliance
with
the
of
December,
1902.
148.
—Translation.]
justice
of
proper
docu-
ments
or 3 of
of October 30,
shall affirm their
that
the
parties
represented
band,
the
follow-
sufficient
the six months
official or
functionary of the Republic, the date of presentation of said petition to be
duly
certified.
by
the
foregoing
article,
shall
transmit
same, if requested to do so by the party at interest, to the c