chapter 8 performance analysis of three level...

30
239 CHAPTER 8 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THREE LEVEL DIODE CLAMPED INVERTER WITH TWO LEVEL VOLTAGE SOURCE INVERTER 8.1 INTRODUCTION An inverter is commonly used in variable speed AC motor drives to produce a variable three-phase AC output voltage from a constant DC voltage source, which has two voltage level (+V DC , -V DC ). The output waveform of inverters should be sinusoidal for efficient operation. But the output of conventional two level PWM inverters would be a square wave (or) quasi square wave. The square wave is rich in harmonic content. To minimize the output voltage distortion with improved fundamental voltage, the multilevel inverter concept has been implemented. The concept of utilizing multiple small voltage levels (multilevel) to perform power conversion was patented by an MIT researcher over twenty years ago. Advantages of this multilevel approach include good power quality, good electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), low switching losses, and high voltage capability. The main disadvantages of this technique are that a larger number of switching semiconductors are required for lower-voltage systems and the small voltage steps must be supplied on the DC side either by a capacitor bank or isolated voltage sources. The first topology introduced was the series H-bridge design (Baker 1975). This was followed by the diode clamped converter which utilized a bank of series capacitors. These designs can create higher power

Upload: doanduong

Post on 02-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

239

CHAPTER 8

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THREE LEVEL DIODE

CLAMPED INVERTER WITH TWO LEVEL VOLTAGE

SOURCE INVERTER

8.1 INTRODUCTION

An inverter is commonly used in variable speed AC motor drives to

produce a variable three-phase AC output voltage from a constant DC voltage

source, which has two voltage level (+VDC, -VDC). The output waveform of

inverters should be sinusoidal for efficient operation. But the output of

conventional two level PWM inverters would be a square wave (or) quasi

square wave. The square wave is rich in harmonic content. To minimize the

output voltage distortion with improved fundamental voltage, the multilevel

inverter concept has been implemented. The concept of utilizing multiple

small voltage levels (multilevel) to perform power conversion was patented

by an MIT researcher over twenty years ago. Advantages of this multilevel

approach include good power quality, good electromagnetic compatibility

(EMC), low switching losses, and high voltage capability. The main

disadvantages of this technique are that a larger number of switching

semiconductors are required for lower-voltage systems and the small voltage

steps must be supplied on the DC side either by a capacitor bank or isolated

voltage sources. The first topology introduced was the series H-bridge design

(Baker 1975). This was followed by the diode clamped converter which

utilized a bank of series capacitors. These designs can create higher power

240

quality for a given number of semiconductor devices than the fundamental

topologies alone due to a multiplying effect of the number of levels.

These multilevel inverters are suitable for high voltage and high

power application due to their ability to synthesize waveforms with better

harmonic spectrum. Numerous topologies have been introduced and widely

studied for utility and drive applications. Multilevel pulse width modulated

(PWM) inverters are gaining importance due to the fact that the lower order

harmonics in the output waveform can be eliminated without any increase in

the higher order harmonics, unlike the regular two level PWM inverters.

Multilevel inverters provide more than two voltage levels. As the number of

levels reaches infinity, the output Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)

approaches to zero. This inverter generates almost sinusoidal staircase voltage

with only one time switching per line cycle. In this chapter the comparative

performance of the three level, three phase diode clamped inverter with the

conventional two level, three phase voltage source inverter was carried out for

both the simulated and hardware models.

8.2 TWO LEVEL PULSE WIDTH MODULATED INVERTER

The standard three-phase voltage source inverter is shown in Figure

8.1 and the eight valid switch states are given in Table 8.1. As in single-phase

VSIs, the switches of any leg of the inverter (S1 and S4, S3 and S6, or S5 and

S2) cannot be switched on simultaneously because this would result in a short

circuit across the DC link voltage supply. Similarly in order to avoid

undefined states in the VSI, and thus undefined AC output line voltages, the

switches of any leg of the inverter cannot be switched off simultaneously as

this will result in voltages that will depend upon the respective line current

polarity. Of the eight valid states, two of them (7 and 8 in Table 8.1) produce

zero AC line voltages. In this case, the AC line currents freewheel through

241

either the upper or lower components. The remaining states (l to 6 in

Table 8.1) produce non-zero AC output voltages. In order to generate a given

voltage waveform, the inverter moves from one state to another. Thus the

resulting AC output line voltages consist of discrete values of voltages that

are iV , 0, and iV . The selection of the states in order to generate the given

waveform is done by the modulating technique that should ensure the use of

only the valid states (Muhammad H. Rashid 2004).

Figure 8.1 Three phase voltage source inverter

Table 8.1 Valid switching states for three-phase VSI

Sl.No. ON State OFF State State abV bcV caV

1. S1, S2 and S6 S4, S5 and S3 1 iV 0 iV

2. S2, S3 and S1 S5, S6 and S4 2 0 iV iV

3. S3, S4 and S2 S6, S1 and S5 3 iV iV 0

4. S4, S5 and S3 S1, S2 and S6 4 iV 0 iV

5. S5, S6 and S4 S2, S3 and S1 5 0 iV iV

6. S6, S1 and S5 S3, S4 and S2 6 iV iV 0 7. S1, S3 and S5 S4, S6 and S2 7 0 0 0 8. S4, S6 and S2 S1, S3 and S5 8 0 0 0

242

8.2.1 Simulation of Two Level PWM Three Phase Inverter

The IGBT based three-phase two level inverter is simulated using

PSpice with sinusoidal modulation and it is shown in Figure 8.2. The inverter

circuit has the following specifications: Input voltage =230V DC, Output

voltage = 230V, 50Hz, three phase AC and load resistance = 360Ω per phase

and its output line voltage waveform is shown in Figure 8.3. It may not be

possible to reduce the overall voltage distortion due to harmonics but by

proper switching control the magnitudes of lower order harmonic voltages can

be reduced, often at the cost of increasing the magnitudes of higher order

harmonic voltages. Such a situation is acceptable in most cases as the

harmonic voltages of higher frequencies can be satisfactorily filtered using

lower sizes of filter chokes and capacitors. Many of the loads, like motor

loads have an inherent quality to suppress high frequency harmonic currents

and hence an external filter may not be necessary. Unlike in square wave

inverters the switches of PWM inverters are turned on and off at significantly

higher frequencies than the fundamental frequency of the output voltage

waveform. Figure 8.4 shows the harmonic spectrum for simulation of three-

phase two level inverter.

Figure 8.2 PSpice model of three-phase two level inverter

243243

Figure 8.3 Output line voltage waveforms for three-phase two level inverter

244

Figure 8.4 Harmonic spectrum for three-phase two level inverter

8.2.2 Hardware Model of Two Level Inverter The hardware model is implemented for the three-phase two level

inverter using TMS 320LF2407 DSP processor for the same specifications mentioned in the previous section. The DSP processor is used to generate the

gating signals. The hardware model is tested for a three-phase resistive load

(360 ohms in each phase) and the test setup is shown in Figure 8.5. The results are recorded by using a fluke 434-power quality analyzer. The output

line– line voltage waveform is shown in Figure 8.6. The harmonic spectrum

of the output line–line voltage and individual harmonic distortion levels are shown in Figures 8.7 and 8.8 respectively. The comparison between the

simulation results and hardware results are shown in Table 8.2.

Figure 8.5 Hardware test setup of two level inverter

245

Figure 8.6 Output line-line voltage waveforms

Figure 8.7 Harmonic spectrum of the line – line voltage waveforms

Figure 8.8 Percentage harmonic distortion of individual harmonic levels

246

Table 8.2 Comparative analysis of % harmonic distortion of output

voltage waveform in both simulated and hardware results

Sl.No. Harmonic order Harmonic Content

Simulation (%) Hardware (%) 1 Fundamental 100.00 100 2 3 0.06 1.1 3 5 17.74 17.0 4 7 4.23 3.6 5 9 0.02 0.2 6 11 2.11 0.6 7 13 1.97 0.5 8 15 0.04 0.6 9 17 3.4 1.2

10 19 1.77 0.4 11 21 0.02 0.3 12 23 1.56 0.3

% THD 18.87 18.3

8.3 THREE LEVEL DIODE CLAMPED MULTI LEVEL

INVERTER

Recently the “multilevel inverter” has drawn tremendous interest in

the power industry (Peng and Lai 1996). The general structure of the

multilevel inverter is to synthesize a sinusoidal voltage from several levels of

DC voltage sources, typically obtained from DC-bus capacitor/voltage

sources. A three-level inverter, also known as a neutral-clamped inverter,

which consists of two capacitor voltages in series and uses the center tap as

the neutral. Each phase leg of the three-level converter has two pairs of

switching devices in series. The center of each device pair is clamped to the

neutral through clamping diodes. The waveform obtained from a three-level

inverter is a quasi-square wave output.

247

The diode clamp method can be applied to higher-level inverters.

As the number of levels increases, the synthesized output waveform adds

more steps, producing a staircase wave which approaches the sinusoidal wave

with minimum harmonic distortion. Ultimately, a zero harmonic distortion of

the output wave can be obtained by an infinite number of levels (Jih-Sheng

Lai and Fang Zheng Peng 1996).

In three level inverters, the switching of the upper and lower

devices in a half-bridge inverter generates a 0aV wave with positive and

negative levels ( dV5.0 and dV5.0 ), respectively. If the fundamental output

voltage and corresponding power level of the PWM inverter are to be

increased to a high value, the DC link voltage dV must be increased and the

devices must be connected in series. By using matched devices in series, static

voltage sharing may be somewhat easy, but dynamic voltage sharing during

switching is always difficult. The problem may be solved by using a

multilevel, Neutral clamped inverter (Fang Zheng Peng 2001).

The diode-clamped inverter provides multiple voltage levels

through connection of the phases to a series bank of capacitors. According to

the original invention, the concept can be extended to any number of levels by

increasing the number of capacitors. Early descriptions of this topology were

limited to three-levels (Fracchia et al 2000), where two capacitors are

connected across the DC bus resulting in one additional level. The additional

level was the neutral point of the dc bus, so the terminology neutral point

clamped (NPC) inverter was introduced. However, with an even number of

voltage levels, the neutral point is not accessible, and the term multiple point

clamped (MPC) is sometimes applied (Fracchia et al 2000). Due to capacitor

voltage balancing issues, the diode-clamped inverter implementation has been

mostly limited to the three-level. Because of industrial developments over the

248

past several years, the three-level inverter is now used extensively in industry

applications (Yamanaka et al 2000). Although most applications are medium-

voltage, a three-level inverter for 480V is on the market.

The basic configuration of a three-level three-phase diode clamped

inverter is shown in Figure 8.9. In this configuration the DC link capacitor C

has been split to create the neutral point 0. Since the operation of all the phase

groups is essentially identical, consider only the operation of the half-bridge

for phase a. A pair of devices with bypass diodes is connected in series with

an additional diode connected between the neutral point and the center of the

pair as shown in Figure 8.9. The devices Q1 and Q4 function as main devices

(like a two-level inverter), and Q2 and Q3 function as auxiliary devices which

help to clamp the output potential to the neutral point with the help of

clamping diodes D1 and D2 (Nikola Celanovic and Dushan Boroyevich

2000).

Figure 8.9 Power circuit of three phase three-level diode clamped

inverter

249

The phase voltage Va0 waveform with three angles and the

corresponding gate voltage switching waves as shown in Figure 8.10. The

main devices (Q1 and Q4) generate the Va0 wave, whereas the auxiliary

devices (Q3 and Q2) are driven complementary to the respective main

devices, with such control, each output potential is clamped to the neutral

potential in the off periods of the PWM control, as indicated in the

Figure 8.10. Evidently, positive phase current +ia will be carried by devices

Q1 and Q2 when Va0 is positive, by devices D3 and D4 when Va0 is negative,

and by devices D1 and Q2 at the neutral clamping condition. On the other

hand, negative phase current- ia will be carried by D1 and D2 when Va0 is

positive, by Q3 and Q4, when Va0 is negative, and by Q3 and D2 at the

neutral clamping condition. This operation mode gives three voltage levels

(+ 0.5Vd, 0, - 0.5Vd) at the Va0 wave, compared to two levels (+0.5Vd and

-0.5Vd) in a conventional two level inverter. The levels of line voltage wave

Vab are +Vd, - Vd, +0.5Vd, - 0.5Vd and 0 compared to levels +Vd, -Vd and 0 in

a two-level inverter. Therefore, the three-phase inverter has 33 = 27 switching

states but there are only eight states are available for a two level inverter. The

Line-Line voltage waveform is shown in Figure 8.11 (Fang Zheng Peng

2001).

Figure 8.10 PWM signals for switching devices of R phase

250

Figure 8.11 Line – line voltage waveform

8.3.1 Simulation of Three Phase Three Level Diode Clamp Inverter

Three-Phase Three Level Diode clamp inverter has been simulated

using PSpice and their results are verified with the developed hardware

model. Figure 8.12 shows the simulated power circuit model for three-phase

three level diode clamped multilevel inverter. The control circuit for

generating PWM pulses for R phase is shown in Figure 8.13 and the

corresponding PWM pulse waveform is shown in Figure 8.14. Similarly

Figures 8.15, 8.16, 8.17 and 8.18 represent the control circuits and

corresponding PWM pulse waveform for Y phase and B phase respectively.

The phase voltage and the line to line voltage of the simulated model are

shown in Figures 8.19 and 8.20 respectively. The harmonic spectrum of the

output line-line voltage is shown in Figure 8.21.

251

Figure 8.12 PSpice simulation of three-phase three level diode clamped inverter

252

Figure 8.13 Control circuits for R-phase

253

Figure 8.14 PSpice simulation results of PWM signals for R-phase

254

Figure 8.15 Control circuits for Y-phase

255

Figure 8.16 PSpice simulation results of PWM signals for Y-phase

256

Figure 8.17 Control circuits for B- phase

257

Figure 8.18 PSpice simulation results of PWM signals for B-phase

258

Figure 8.19 Output phase-neutral voltage of three level diode clamped inverter

Figure 8.20 Output line-line voltage of three level diode clamped inverter

259

Figure 8.21 Harmonic spectrum for output voltage of three level diode

clamped inverter

8.3.2 Hardware Implementation of Three Phase Three Level Diode

Clamp Inverter

The hardware model of the three-phase three-level diode clamped

multilevel inverter is implemented by using TMS320LF2407 DSP Processor.

The hardware description of the system is shown in Figure 8.22. The

hardware model contains a diode bridge rectifier, power circuit, opto-coupler,

gate drive circuitry, current sensor and signal conditioner. The input of diode

bridge rectifier is 230V, 50Hz AC supply. KBPC 3510 device is used as diode

bridge rectifier. An isolation transformer is a transformer, often with

symmetrical windings, which is used to decouple two circuits. An isolation

transformer allows an AC signal or power to be taken from one device and

fed into another without electrically connecting the two circuits. Isolation

transformers block transmission of DC signals from one circuit to the other,

but allow AC signals to pass. They also block interference caused by ground

loops. Isolation transformers are commonly designed with careful attention to

capacitive coupling between the two windings. This is necessary because

excessive capacitance could also couple AC current from the primary to the

secondary. A grounded shield is commonly interposed between the primary

260

and the secondary. Any remaining capacitive coupling between the secondary

and ground simply causes the secondary to become balanced about the ground

potential.

Figure 8.22 Hardware description of three level diode clamped inverter

The three-phase three level diode clamped inverter for one leg is

shown in Figure 8.23. To obtain the output voltages in three steps per leg

are 0 , 2dcV and dcV . Thus for a three-phase inverter there are 27 states in

total. Table.8.3 gives overall switching states of the inverter. In this structure

we use 32)1( M switching devices, 3)2()1( MM clamping diodes

and )1( M capacitors. ,8,5,4,1 SSSS and 12,9 SS are the main switches,

they are switched directly by control pulses. 7,6,3,2 SSSS and 11,10 SS are

the auxiliary switches and allow connection of the output of each phase to

neutral point. The circuit is designed for the output voltage of three-phase,

230V, 50Hz. The IGBT1 MBH15D is used as power switching device.

261

Figure 8.23 Three-phase three level diode clamped inverter for one leg

Table 8.3 States of the switches for one leg of inverter

Sl.No. Symbols of

States States of the Switches Output

Voltages S1 S2 S3 S4 1 P 1 1 0 0 dV

2 0 0 1 1 0 2dV

3 N 0 0 1 1 0

The developed hardware model of three-phase three-level diode

clamped inverter with DSP processor is shown in Figure 8.24. The hardware

model is tested for a three-phase resistive load (360 ohms in each phase) and

the test setup is shown in Figure 8.25. The gating pulses are generated using

TMS 320LF2407 DSP processor and all R, Y and B phase PWM signals are

observed as shown in Figures 8.26, 8.27 and 8.28 respectively. The output

line–line voltage waveform is shown in Figure 8.29. The harmonic spectrum

of the output line–line voltage and its harmonic level table for different odd

harmonics orders are shown in Figures 8.30 and 8.31 respectively. The

comparison between the simulation results and hardware results are shown in

Table 8.4.

262

Figure 8.24 Hardware model for three-phase three level diode clamped

inverter

Figure 8.25 Test setup for hardware model of three level diode clamped

inverter

263

Figure 8.26 Hardware PWM pulse – R-phase

Figure 8.27 Hardware PWM pulse – Y-phase

Figure 8.28 Hardware PWM pulse – B-phase

264

Figure 8.29 Output line-line voltage of three level diode clamped inverter

Figure 8.30 Harmonic spectrum of line-line voltage

Figure 8.31 Percentage harmonic distortion of individual harmonic levels

265

Table 8.4 Comparative analysis of % harmonic distortion of output

voltage waveform for both simulated and hardware results

Sl.No. Harmonic Order Harmonic Content

Simulation Result (%)

Hardware Result (%)

1 Fundamental 100 100 2 3 0.28 0.4 3 5 0.75 1.0 4 7 0.03 1.5 5 9 0.04 0.2 6 11 0.05 0.2 7 13 0.01 0.5 8 15 0.85 1.7 9 17 1.10 2.1

10 19 0.65 0.4 11 21 1.21 2.7 12 23 0.30 0.8

% THD 5.69 7.8

The three-phase three level diode clamp inverter is designed and

simulated using PSpice and their results are verified and compared with

developed hardware for the rating of 230V, 10A, and 1KW and tested with

the resistive load, which results are validated using power quality analyzer

(Fluke-434). The proposed new Diode Clamped multilevel inverter has been

provided high quality of both output voltages and currents. Thus, the

proposed multilevel inverter provides higher performance, less EMI, and

higher efficiency. Because the switching frequency is the line frequency,

switching losses and related EMI are negligible.

266

8.4 COMPARISON OF TWO LEVEL AND THREE LEVEL

DIODE CLAMPED INVERTER

In multilevel inverters the power switches of lower voltage can be

used to obtain desired voltages. These are faster and smaller than the power

switches of high voltage, which is used in two level inverters. Multilevel

inverters offer better sinusoidal voltage waveform than two voltage levels.

This cause the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) to be lower. Switching

losses are reduced because switching frequency can be lower than that of two

level inverter and also the switching speed is faster. Conduction losses are

also lower because of low forward-voltage drop. When several voltage levels

are used, the dv/dt of the output voltage is smaller thus the stress in cables and

motors is smaller. The energy per cycle is more in the three level inverter

when compared to two level inverter.

In the determination of inverter configuration, usually the cost

comparison of different configuration has to be executed. The cost of the

inverter is affected mainly by the DC-link capacitor, IGBT and the filtering

components, while rests of the electronic component have quite insignificant

affects. The good estimation of inverter costs can be done by comparing the

cost of IGBT and Capacitor. In general, the two-level configuration is 30%

cheaper than the three-level configuration. The difference is mostly due to the

cost of clamping diodes, which are not needed in two-level configuration. The

cost comparison is not taking account the effect of the volume to the unit

prices. The effect of volume will decrease the unit price, which can affect to

the relation between total costs.

The hardware and SIMULINK model of three-phase two-level sine

PWM inverter is compared with hardware and PSpice based model of three-

phase three-level diode clamped inverter. The harmonic levels of the different

267

odd harmonic for both hardware model of conventional two level PWM

inverter and three-phase three level diode clamped inverter as shown in

Table 8.5.

Table 8.5 Comparative analysis of % harmonic distortion in two level

and three level inverter

Sl.No. Harmonic Order

% Harmonic Content Two-Level Inverter Three-Level Inverter

Simulation Hardware Simulation Hardware 1 Fundamental 100.00 100 100 100 2 3 0.06 1.1 0.28 0.4 3 5 17.74 17.0 0.75 1.0 4 7 4.23 3.6 0.03 1.5 5 9 0.02 0.2 0.04 0.2 6 11 2.11 0.6 0.05 0.2 7 13 1.97 0.5 0.01 0.5 8 15 0.04 0.6 0.85 1.7 9 17 3.4 1.2 1.10 2.1

10 19 1.77 0.4 0.65 0.4 11 21 0.02 0.3 1.21 2.7 12 23 1.56 0.3 0.30 0.8

% THD 18.87 18.3 5.69 7.8

8.5 CONCLUSION

The multilevel inverter topology can overcome some of the

limitations of the standard two-level inverter. Output voltage and power

increase with number of levels. Harmonics decrease as the number of levels

increase. In addition, increasing output voltage does not require an increase in

voltage rating of individual force commutated devices. The three level diode

268

clamp inverter is discussed in detail with experimental results to verify the

simulated results. The performance of the proposed three level diode clamp

inverter is compared with the conventional two level inverter for both

experimental and simulated results. The three level inverter, total harmonic

distortion reduced by 57.38% as compared with two level inverter. Three

level inverter can work at a very low switching frequency, which gives the

possibility to work with low speed semiconductors, and to generate low

switching frequency losses.