chapter 5: applying consumer theory
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory. From chap 2&3, we learned that supply & demand curves yield a market equilibrium. From chap 4, we learned that a consumer maximizes his/her utility subject to constraints. This chapter does: Derive demand curves from one’s u-max problem - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter 5:Applying Consumer Theory
• From chap 2&3, we learned that supply & demand curves yield a market equilibrium.
• From chap 4, we learned that a consumer maximizes his/her utility subject to constraints.
• This chapter does:– Derive demand curves from one’s u-max problem– How Δin income shifts demand (income elasticity)– Two effects of a price change on demand– Deriving labor supply curve using consumer theory– Inflation adjustment
![Page 2: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• A consumer chooses an optimal bundle of goods subject to budget constraints.
• From the consumer’s optimum choice, we can derive the demand function:
x1= x1(p1, p2, Y)
• By varying own price (p1), holding both p2 and Y constant, we know how much x1 is demanded at any price.
→ Use this info to draw the demand curve.
5.1 Deriving Demand Curves
![Page 3: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Figure 5.1 Deriving an Individual’s Demand Curve
Suppose that the price of beer changes while the price of wine remains constant.
Y = pbeerQbeer + pwineQwine
Original prices: pbeer=12, pwine=35Income: Y = 419The consumer can consume 12 (=419/35) units of wine or 35 (=419/12) units of beer if she consumes only one of the two.
Draw the budget line.
The price of beer changes: pbeer=6, pbeer=4 She can now consume 70 (=419/6) or 105(=419/4) units of beer.
![Page 4: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Figure 5.1 Continued.
Change Pbeer holding Pwine and Y constant.
→ New budget constraint→ New optimal bundle of goods.
Tracing these optimal xbeer*, we can draw the demand curve for beer on Price-Quantity space.
![Page 5: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5.2 How changes in Income shift demand curves
• How does demand curve change when income shifts, holding prices constant?
![Page 6: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Figure 5.2 Effect of Budget Increase on an Individual’s Demand Curve
• Suppose that the income of the consumer increases.
• Income increases to $628 and $837 for same prices.
• She can now consume 18 (=628/35) units of wine or 52 (=628/12) units of beer if she consumes either one.
• Or she can now consume 24 (=837/35) units of wine or 70 (=837/12) units of beer if she consumes either one.
• The budget line expands outward, and she consumes more wine and beer because she can!
![Page 7: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Figure 5.2 Continued.
Change Y holding Pbeer and Pwine constant.→ Budget line shifts outward→ New optimal bundle of goods
Demand curves shifts outward as Y increases if the good is normal.
Engel curve summarizes the relationship between income and quantity demanded, holding prices constant.
![Page 8: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Income Elasticity of Demand
= How much quantity demanded changes when income increases.
% /
% /d d d d
d
in Q Q Q Q Y
in Y Y Y Y Q
Normal good η≥ 0 As Y rises, Qd also rises
Luxury η> 1 Qd increases by a greater proportion than Y
Necessity η< 1 Qd increases by a lesser proportion than Y
Inferior good η< 0 As Y rises, Qd decreases
![Page 9: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Figure 5.3 Income-Consumption Curves and Income Elasticities
![Page 10: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Figure 5.4 A Good that is both Inferior and Normal
![Page 11: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
5.3 Effects of a Price Change
• A decrease in p1 holding p2 & Y constant has two effects on individual’s demand:
Substitution effect: Change in Qd due to consumer’s behavior of substituting good 1 for good 2 (because x1 now relatively cheap), holding utility constant.
Income effect: Change in Qd due to effectively-increased income (lower p1 = higher buying power), holding prices constant.
Total effect = Substitution effect + Income effect
![Page 12: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Total Effect
Suppose the consumer is maximizing utility at point A.
If the price of good x1 falls, the consumer will maximize utility at point B.This can be decomposed into two effects.
x1
x2
U1
A
U2
B
Total increase in x1
![Page 13: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Substitution Effect
To isolate the substitution effect, we holdthe utility level constant but allow the relative price of good x1 to change
The substitution effect is the movementfrom point A to point C
The individual substitutes good x1 for good x2 because good x1 is now relatively cheaper
U1
x1
x2
A
Substitution effect
C
![Page 14: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Income Effect
The income effect occurs because theindividual’s “real” income changes whenthe price of good x1 changes
The income effect is the movementfrom point C to point B
If x is a normal good,the individual will buy more because “real”income increased
What if x1 is an inferior good?
B
U1
U2
x1
x2
A C
Incomeeffect
Substitution effect
Total effect
![Page 15: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Ordinary Goods and Giffen Goods
Ordinary Goods: As P decreases, Qd increases. ∂x1/∂p1 < 0 Giffen Goods: As P decreases, Qd decreases. ∂x1/∂p1 > 0
![Page 16: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
5.5 Deriving Labor Supply Curve
• We normally use consumer theory to derive demand behavior. But here, we derive labor supply curve using consumer theory.
• Individuals must decide how to allocate the fixed amount of time they have.
• The point here is “time is money.” When we do not work, we sacrifice or forgo wage income. That is, the opportunity cost of time is equal to the wage rate.
![Page 17: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Utility function:
u= U(Y, N)
where N= Leisure time and Y is the consumption of other goods, which is equal to the labor income (wages).
Time constraint: H (labor time) + N = 24 hours
Max u = U(Y, N)
Subject to Y = w1 H = w1 (24 – N)
Model
![Page 18: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Budget Line
The time constraint: H + N =24
Leisure
Y = 24w
N (Leisure) H (Labor time)
Y = wH
The labor time determines how muchthe consumer can consumes the other goods.
![Page 19: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Figure 5.8 Demand for leisure
Given 24hrs and wage w1
Original optimum at e1
To derive demand for leisure, increase wage to w2
New optimum at e2
A higher wage means a higher price of leisure
Demand curve for leisure on Price-Quantity space
![Page 20: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Figure 5.9 Supply Curve of Labor
![Page 21: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Substitution and Income Effects
• Both effects occur when w changes– Substitution effect: When w rises, the price for
leisure increases due to higher opportunity cost, and the individual will choose less leisure
– Income effect: Because leisure is a normal good, with increased income, she will choose more leisure
• The income and substitution effects move in opposite directions if leisure is a normal good.
![Page 22: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Figure 5.10 Income and Substitution Effects of a Wage Change
![Page 23: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The substitution effect is the movementfrom point A to point C
The individual chooses less leisure at B as a result of the increase in w
The income effect is the movementfrom point C to point B
Case 1: Substitution effect > Income effect
U1
U2
Leisure ( N)
Consumption( Y)
A
B
C
Substitution effectIncome effect
Total effect
![Page 24: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Consumption( Y)The substitution effect is the movementfrom point A to point C
The individual chooses more leisure at B as a result of the increase in w
The income effect is the movementfrom point C to point B
Case 2: Substitution effect < Income effect
U1
U2
Leisure( N)
A
BC
Substitution effectIncome effect
Total effect
![Page 25: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Application: Will you stop working if you win a lottery?
Figure 5.11 Labor Supply Curve that Slopes Upward and then Bends Backward
![Page 26: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Tax revenue and Tax rates
Application: What is the optimal (i.e., maximizes the tax
revenue) marginal tax rate?
Sweden 58% (vs. actual 65%) Japan: 54 % (vs. 24 %)
![Page 27: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Child-CareSubsidies:
The same resource for subsidy and the lump-sum payment. This means that the budgets lines go through e2.
![Page 28: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
5.4 Cost of Living Adjustments
• Nominal price: Actual price of a good• Real price: Price adjusted for inflation
• Consumer Price Index (Laspeyres index): Weighted average of the price increase for each good where weights are each good’s budget share in base year
![Page 29: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Example
In the first case, both relative and real prices remain unchanged.
Real price = Nominal price / Price index, e.g., \240/2.00.
In the second case, it is not clear how we should compute the price index (P).
One reasonable way may be
where s: budget share
Year P1 P2
Price index
2000 \120 \500 100
2007 \240 \1,000 200
Year P1 P2
Price index
2000 \120 \500 100
2007 \108 \550 ??
1 1 2 21 2
1 2
p p p pP s s
p p
![Page 30: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Price Index
Laspeyres index (Lp)
weight: base year quantity
= (Cost of buying the base-year’s bundles in the current year) / (Actual cost in the base year)
Paasche index (Pp)
weight: current year quantity
0 01 1 2 20 0 0 01 1 2 2
0 0 0 01 1 1 2 2 20 0 0 0
1 2
t t
p
t t
p x p xL
p x p x
p x p p x p
Y p Y p
1 1 2 20 01 1 2 2
1 1 1 2 2 20 01 2
t t t t
p t t
t t t t t t
t t
p x p xP
p x p x
p x p p x p
Y p Y p
![Page 31: Chapter 5: Applying Consumer Theory](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081506/56813b03550346895da3a3d5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)