theory consumer choice

26
21 21 The Theory of Consumer Choice

Upload: omar-faruk-hasib

Post on 21-Jan-2015

312 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


1 download

DESCRIPTION

About the theory of consumer choice in microeconomics.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Theory consumer choice

2121The Theory of Consumer Choice

Page 2: Theory consumer choice

Utility, Total Utility and Marginal Utility • In economics, the satisfaction or pleasure consumers

derive from the consumption of goods is called “utility”.

• Total utility is the total utility a consumer derives from the consumption of all units of a good over a given consumption period.

• Marginal utility is the utility a consumer derives from the last unit of a good she or he consumes during a given consumption period.

• Total utility = Sum of marginal utilities

• The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility

Over a given consumption period, as more and more of a good is consumed by a consumer, beyond a certain point, the marginal utility of additional units begins to fall.

Page 3: Theory consumer choice

Total Utility

0

50

100

150

200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Marginal Utility

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Q ($) TU ($) MU0 01 40 402 85 453 120 354 140 205 150 106 157 77 160 38 160 09 155 -510 145 -10

145

How much ice cream does Jill buy in a month?

Total and Marginal Utility for Ice Cream

Page 4: Theory consumer choice

BUDGET CONSTRAINT: What a consumer can afford

• The budget constraint depicts the limit on the consumption “bundles” that a consumer can afford.• People consume less than they desire because their

spending is constrained by their income.

• Budget constraint shows various combinations of goods the consumer can afford given his or her income and the prices of the two goods.

• If a consumer wants to spend $ 1,000 on Pepsi and pizza, where price of Pepsi is $ 2 and Pizza is $10, then probable combinations would be:

Page 5: Theory consumer choice

Probable combinations of Pepsi and Pizza under Budget Constraint

Page 6: Theory consumer choice

Figure 1 The Consumer’s Budget Constraint

Quantityof Pepsi

0

Consumer’sbudget constraint

500B

250

50

C

100

A

Cannot be EE

Quantity of Pizza

Page 7: Theory consumer choice

• Illustration of Figure 1 (Consumer’s Budget Constraint)

• For example, if the consumer buys no pizzas, he can afford 500 pints of Pepsi (point B). If he buys no Pepsi, he can afford 100 pizzas (point A).

• Alternately, the consumer can buy 50 pizzas and 250 pints of Pepsi (point C).

• But the consumer cannot go out of the inner boundary of budget line (point E).

• Any point on the budget line indicates the consumer’s combination or tradeoff between two goods

• The slope of the budget line equals the relative price of the two goods, that is, the ratio of price of one good compared to the price of the other.

• It measures the rate at which a consumer trade a good for other

Page 8: Theory consumer choice

PREFERENCES: What a consumer wants

• A consumer’s preference among consumption bundles may be illustrated with indifference curves.

• An indifference curve is a curve that shows consumption bundles that give the consumer the same level of satisfaction

Page 9: Theory consumer choice

Figure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences

Quantityof Pepsi

0

Indifferencecurve, I1

I2

C

B

A

D

Quantity of Pizza

Page 10: Theory consumer choice

Representing Preferences with Indifference Curves

• The Consumer’s Preferences

• The consumer is indifferent, or equally happy, with the combinations shown at points A, B, and C because they are all on the same curve.

• The Marginal Rate of Substitution

• The slope at any point on an indifference curve is the marginal rate of substitution.

• It is the rate at which a consumer is willing to trade one good for another.

• It is the amount of one good that a consumer requires as compensation to give up one unit of the other good.

Page 11: Theory consumer choice

Figure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences

Quantityof Pepsi

0

Indifferencecurve, I1

I21

MRS

C

B

A

D

Quantity of Pizza

MRS = MU (Piz) / MU (Pep) = Change in Pepsi/Change in Pizza

Page 12: Theory consumer choice

Four Properties of Indifference Curves

• Property 1: Higher indifference curves are preferred to lower ones.• Consumers usually prefer more of something to get.

• Higher indifference curves represent larger quantities of goods than do lower indifference curves.

• Property 2: Indifference curves are downward sloping.• A consumer is willing to give up one good only if he or she gets

more of the other good in order to remain equally happy.

• If the quantity of one good is reduced, the quantity of the other good must increase.

• For this reason, most indifference curves slope downward.

Page 13: Theory consumer choice

Copyright©2004 South-Western

Figure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences

Quantityof Pepsi

0

Indifferencecurve, I1

I2

C

B

A

D

Quantity of Pizza

Page 14: Theory consumer choice

• Property 3: Indifference curves do not cross.• Points A and B should make the consumer equally happy.

• Points B and C should make the consumer equally happy.

• This implies that A and C would make the consumer equally happy.

• But C has more of both goods compared to A.

• Property 4: Indifference curves are bowed inward.• People are more willing to trade away goods that they have in

abundance and less willing to trade away goods of which they have little.

• These differences in a consumer’s marginal substitution rates cause his or her indifference curve to bow inward.

Four Properties of Indifference Curves

Page 15: Theory consumer choice

Figure 3 The Impossibility of Intersecting Indifference Curves

Quantityof Pepsi

0

C

A

B

Quantity of Pizza

Page 16: Theory consumer choice

Figure 4 Bowed Indifference Curves

Quantityof Pepsi

0

Indifferencecurve

8

3

A

3

7

B

1

MRS = 6

1MRS = 14

6

14

2Quantity of Pizza

Page 17: Theory consumer choice

OPTIMIZATION: What the consumer chooses

• Consumers want to get the combination of goods on the highest possible indifference curve.

• However, the consumer must also end up on or below his budget constraint.

The Consumer’s Optimal Choices

• Combining the indifference curve and the budget constraint determines the consumer’s optimal choice.

Page 18: Theory consumer choice

Figure 6 The Consumer’s Optimum

Quantityof Pepsi

0

Budget constraint

I1

I2

I3

Optimum

AB

MRS = MUPiz /MUPep= PPiz /PPep

Quantity of Pizza

Page 19: Theory consumer choice

The Consumer’s Optimal Choice

• Consumer optimum occurs at the point where the highest indifference curve and the budget constraint are tangent.

• The consumer chooses consumption of the two goods so that the marginal rate of substitution equals the relative price.

• For Two-Good Rule

MUPep $PPep

--------- = ----------

MUPiz $PPiz

Page 20: Theory consumer choice

How Changes in Income Affect the Consumer’s Choices

• An increase in income shifts the budget constraint outward.• The consumer is able to choose a better combination of

goods on a higher indifference curve.

• Normal versus Inferior Goods• If a consumer buys more of a good when his or her income

rises, the good is called a normal good (+)

• If a consumer buys less of a good when his or her income rises, the good is called an inferior good (-).

Page 21: Theory consumer choice

Figure 7 An Increase in Income

Quantityof Pizza

Quantityof Pepsi

0

New budget constraint

I1

I2

2. . . . raising pizza consumption . . .

3. . . . andPepsiconsumption.

Initialbudgetconstraint

1. An increase in income shifts thebudget constraint outward . . .

Initialoptimum

New optimum

Page 22: Theory consumer choice

Figure 8 An Inferior Good

Quantityof Pepsi

0

Initialbudgetconstraint

New budget constraint

I1I2

1. When an increase in income shifts thebudget constraint outward . . .3. . . . but

Pepsiconsumptionfalls, makingPepsi aninferior good.

2. . . . pizza consumption rises, making pizza a normal good . . .

Initialoptimum

New optimum

Quantity of Pizza

Page 23: Theory consumer choice

How Changes in Prices Affect Consumer’s Choices

• A fall in the price of any good rotates the budget constraint outward and changes the slope of the budget constraint.

• Substitute the cheaper goods if price of one goods increase relative to another

Page 24: Theory consumer choice

Figure 9 A Change in Price

Quantityof Pepsi

0

1,000 D

500 B

100

A

I1

I2

Initial optimum

New budget constraint

Initialbudgetconstraint

1. A fall in the price of Pepsi rotates the budget constraint outward . . .

3. . . . andraising Pepsiconsumption.

2. . . . reducing pizza consumption . . .

New optimum

Quantity of Pizza

Page 25: Theory consumer choice

Summary

• A consumer’s budget constraint shows the possible combinations of different goods he can buy given his income and the prices of the goods.

• The slope of the budget constraint equals the relative price of the goods.

• The consumer’s indifference curves represent his preferences.

• Points on higher indifference curves are preferred to points on lower indifference curves.

• The slope of an indifference curve at any point is the consumer’s marginal rate of substitution.

• A consumer optimizes by choosing the point on his budget constraint that lies on the highest indifference curve.

Page 26: Theory consumer choice

Summary• When the price of a good falls, the impact on the

consumer’s choices can be broken down into an income effect and a substitution effect.

The two effects of a price change:

• Income effect:Normal good (+)

Inferior goods (-)

• Substitution effect Happens as Price of Pepsi decreases, Pizza became

comparatively expensive

Consumer buy less Pizza and substituting it with Pepsi until

the optimizing condition is restored (-)