chapter 4 final super

Upload: jesh-alberto

Post on 14-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    1/45

    49

    CHAPTER 4

    PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

    This chapter presents, analyzes and interprets the data gathered from the

    survey conducted in relation to the problems of the study. The researchers

    analyze the data gathered by breaking up the whole study into constituent parts

    according to the specific questions under the statement of the problem. This is to

    bring out focus on the essential features of the studies they presented the data

    by organizing them into logical, sequential, and meaningful categories and

    classifications to make them amenable to study and interpretation.

    1. Business Perspective

    Table 1 presents the frequency distribution, percentage, and ranking of

    business perspective as to years of existence.

    Table 1

    Business Perspective According to Years of Existence

    Years of Existence Frequency Percentage Rank

    From 3 years up to 5 years 11 36.67% 2

    From 6 years up to 8 years 15 50% 1

    From 9 years up to 11 years 3 10% 3

    From 12 years up to 14 years 0 0% -

    15 years and above 1 3.33% 4

    Total 30 100%

    Table 1 illustrates the distribution of the business perspective according to

    years of existence. Out of 30 respondents, 11 or 36.67% of them work on the

    branch that exists from 3 to 5 years. Fifteen (15) or 50% of them are working at

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    2/45

    50

    the branch that exists from 6 to 8 years .Three (3) or 10% of them work on the

    branch that exists from 9 to 11 years while one (1) or 3.33% is working on a

    branch that exists for 15 years and above. It shows that majority of the

    respondents are in branches with 3 to 5 years of existence.

    Table 2 presents the frequency distribution, percentage and ranking of the

    business perspective as to their number of personnel in each branch.

    Table 2

    Business Perspective According to Number of Personnel in each Branch

    Number of personnel in eachbranch

    Frequency Percentage Rank

    1 2 pharmacists 11 36.67% 2

    3 5 pharmacists 18 60% 1

    6 10 pharmacists 1 3.33% 3

    Total 30 100%

    Table 2 shows that 11 or 36.67% of the respondents are in the branch that

    have 1 2 pharmacists. Eighteen (18) or 60% are in the branches that have 3

    5 pharmacists and one (1) or 3.33% are in the branches that have 6 10

    pharmacists. It shows that majority of the respondents are in branches that have

    3 5 pharmacists.

    Table 3 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking of

    the business perspective as to location.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    3/45

    51

    Table 3

    Business Perspective According to Location

    Location Frequency Percentage Rank

    Wet/Dry Market 3 10% 3

    Church/Schools 2 6.67% 4.5

    Shopping Malls 2 6.67% 4.5

    Commercial center 2 6.67% 4.5

    Along highways 17 56.67% 1

    Hospitals 4 13.33% 2

    Total 30 100%

    The results show that three (3) or 10% of the respondents are in branches

    that are located near the wet/dry market. Two (2) or 6.67% of the respondents

    are in branches that are located near the church/schools, shopping malls and

    commercial center. Seventeen (17) or 56.67% of the respondents are in a branch

    located along highways and 4 or 13.33% are located near the hospitals. It shows

    that most of the respondents are located in branches that are along highways.

    Table 4 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking of

    the business perspective as to sources of drugs and medicines.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    4/45

    52

    Table 4

    Business Perspective According to Sources of Drugs and Medicines

    Sources of Drugs andMedicines

    Frequency Percentage Rank

    Pharmaceutical companies 14 46.67% 2

    Head Office 16 53.33% 1

    Total 30 100%

    Based on the above table, the branches source of drugs are within

    pharmaceutical companies with a frequency of 14 or 46.67% and the head office

    with a frequency of 53.33%.

    Table 5 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking of the

    business perspective as to most saleable drugs.

    Table 5

    Business Perspective According to Most Saleable Drug

    Most Saleable Drugs Frequency Percentage Rank

    Paracetamol 17 56.67% 1

    Amoxicillin 11 36.67% 2

    Acetylsalicylic acid 2 6.66% 3

    Total 30 100%

    Table 5 shows that the majority of the respondents are said that their most

    saleable product is Paracetamol with frequency of 17 or 56.67%. It was followed

    by Amoxicillin with a frequency of 11 or 36.67%. Acetylsalicylic acid ranked third

    with frequency of two (2) or 6.66%.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    5/45

    53

    Table 6 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking of

    the business perspective as services rendered.

    Table 6

    Business Perspective According to Services Rendered

    Services Rendered Frequency Percentage Rank

    Drug information 6 20% 2

    Patient counselling 2 6.67% 3

    Generic dispering 22 73.33% 1

    Total 30 100%

    Table 6 shows that six (6) or 20% of the branches render drug information

    service. Two (2) or 6.67% of the branches render patient counselling and twenty-

    two (22) or 73.33% of the branches render generic dispersing.

    . Table 7 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking

    of the business perspective as to storage facilities.

    Table 7

    Business Perspective According to Storage Facilities

    Storage Facilities Frequency Percentage Rank

    Stockroom within the drugstore 27 90% 1

    Bodega/warehouse 2 6.67% 2

    Satellite/depots 1 3.33% 3

    Total 30 100%

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    6/45

    54

    Table 7 shows that 27 or 90% of the branches storage facilities is a

    stockroom. Two (2) of the branches storage facility is a bodega/warehouse while

    one (1) or 3.33% is a satellite/depots.

    Thirty (30) or 100% of the branch respondents agreed that the branch

    apply just window display type of merchandise display.

    2. Profile of the Respondents

    Table 8 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking of

    the respondents by their age.

    Table 8

    Distribution of Respondents According to Age

    Age Frequency Percentage Rank

    25 years and below9 30% 226 30 years old 11 36.67% 1

    31 35 years old 8 26.67% 3

    36 40 years old 2 6.67% 4

    41 45 years old 1 3.33% 5.5

    46 years old and above 1 3.33% 5.5

    Total 30 100%

    The result shows that nine (9) or 30% of the respondents are in the age of

    below 25. Eleven (11) or 36.67 % of the respondents are in 26 to 30 years old

    while eight (8) or 26.67% are 30 to 35 years old. Two of the respondents are in

    the age of 36 to 40 and lastly, one (1) or 3.33% of the respondents is 41 to 45

    and 46 years old above.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    7/45

    55

    Table 9 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking of

    the respondents by their civil status.

    Table 9

    Distribution of Respondents According to Civil Status

    Civil Status Frequency Percentage Rank

    Single 24 80% 1

    Married5 16.67% 2

    Widow/widower 1 3.33% 3Total 30 100%

    The result shows that 24 or 80% of the respondents are married while five

    (5) or 16.67% are single and lastly one (1) or 3.33% of them is a widow/widower.

    Table 10 presents the frequency distribution and percentage and ranking

    of the respondents by their position in the company.

    Table 10

    Distribution of Respondents According to Position in the Company

    Position in the CompanyFrequency Percentage Rank

    Branch Manager5 16.67% 4Assistant Branch Manager6 20% 3

    Branch Administrative Assistant 4 13.33% 5

    Chief Pharmacist 7 23.33% 2

    Pharmacy Assistant 8 26.67% 1

    Total 30 100%

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    8/45

    56

    The above table shows that five (5) of the respondents are branch

    managers, six (6) or 20% of the respondents are assistant branch manager, four

    (4) of them are branch administrative assistant, seven (7) or 26.67% are chief

    pharmacist and eight or (8) or 26.67 are pharmacy assistants.

    Thirty or 100% of the respondents agreed that they are all female, their

    highest educational attainment is bachelors degree and their length of service in

    the company is below 15 years.

    3. Supply Chain

    Table 11 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to product procurement.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    9/45

    57

    Table11

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Supply Chain

    Relative to Product Procurement

    Product ProcurementWeighted

    MeanVerbal

    Interpretation

    1. Procurement personnel follows the purchasingprocedure.

    4.93 StronglyAgree

    2. Chief pharmacist prepare an order list (list ofin support of each acquisition.

    4.70 StronglyAgree

    3. Consumption of drugs (fast selling andslow-moving medicines) is accounted

    in making an order list.

    4.77Strongly

    Agree4. Epidemic or common/seasonal diseases

    (e.g. in the colder season, increase demand forcold and cough medicine) is also considered inmaking an order list.

    4.63

    StronglyAgree

    5. Discounts offered on volume purchase areconsidered in preparing an order list.

    4.40Agree

    6. Demand changes of drugs is regarded as topreparation of an order list.

    4.33Agree

    7. Expiration dates of medicines are alsoaccounted in making an order list.

    4.87 StronglyAgree

    8. Morbidity (actual needs of customers) andtreatment schedule (frequency of diseases) are

    considered in preparing an order list.4.77

    StronglyAgree

    9. The chief pharmacist approves the orderlist to verify the order.

    4.83 StronglyAgree

    10. The branch acquires medicines from themain office.

    4.87 StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.71 StronglyAgree

    Table 11 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to product procurement. In question 1, the result shows that the

    respondents strongly agreed that the personnel in the procurement follows the

    purchasing procedure, with a computed weighted mean of 4.93. In the next

    question, the result shows that the branch representatives strongly agreed that

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    10/45

    58

    the chief pharmacist prepare an order list in support of ach acquisition with the

    computed weighted mean of 4.70. In question 3, respondents strongly agreed

    that the chief pharmacist takes into account the consumption in preparing an

    order list with the computed weighted mean of 4.77. With the computed mean of

    4.63, branch representatives strongly agreed that the chief pharmacist considers

    epidemics or common/seasonal diseases in preparing an order list. With the

    computed weighted mean of 4.40, branch representatives agree that discounts

    offered on volume purchase are considered in preparing an order list. In question

    6, branch representatives strongly agreed that the demand changes of drugs is

    regarded as to the preparation of an order list with the computed weighted mean

    of 4.33. In question 7, respondents strongly agreed that the expiration of dates of

    medicines is also accounted in making an order list with the computed weighted

    mean of 4.87. With the computed weighted mean of 4.77 the respondents

    strongly agreed that morbidity and treatment of schedule are considered in

    preparing an order list. In the ninth question, the result shows that the chief

    pharmacist approves the order list to verify the order with the computed weighted

    mean of 4.83. With the computed weighted mean of 4.87, the respondents

    strongly agreed that branch acquires medicines from the main office.

    In summary, supply chain relative to product procurement resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.71

    Table 12 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to delivery and receiving.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    11/45

    59

    Table12

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Supply Chain Relative to

    Delivery and Receiving

    Delivery and ReceivingWeighted Mean

    VerbalInterpretatio

    n

    1. A copy of the order list is retained to countercheckwhat was ordered and what was supplied.

    4.93 StronglyAgree

    2. Supplies received are packed and checked in thequarantine area by trained personnel.

    4.97 StronglyAgree

    3. The expiry dates are checked to ensure that there

    is adequate shelf life remaining.

    4.90 Strongly

    Agree4. Medicines requiring cold chain are refrigerated

    while in transit.4.93 Strongly

    Agree

    5. Receiving reports are completed as soon aspossible after the shipment is receive.

    4.83 StronglyAgree

    6. Records of returned medicines are maintained in aregister.

    4.73 StronglyAgree

    7. The head office should be notified immediately incase of any discrepancies.

    4.97 StronglyAgree

    8. Defective or poor quality stocks are not sold. 4.83 StronglyAgree

    9. The branch manager checks the items received todetermine conformance with requirements andspecifications.

    4.97 StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.90 Agree

    Table 12 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of

    supply chain relative to delivery and receiving. In question 1, the result shows

    that the respondents strongly agreed that a copy of the order list is retained to

    countercheck what was ordered and what was supplied, with a computed

    weighted mean of 4.93. In the next question, the result shows that the branch

    representatives strongly agreed that the supplies received are packed and

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    12/45

    60

    checked in the quarantine area by trained personnel, with the computed

    weighted mean of 4.97. In question 3, respondents strongly agreed that the

    expiry dates are checked to ensure that there is adequate shelf life remaining,

    with the computed weighted mean of 4.90. With the computed mean of 4.93,

    branch representatives strongly agreed that the medicines requiring cold chain

    are refrigerated while in transit. With the computed weighted mean of 4.83,

    branch representatives agree that receiving reports are completed as soon as

    possible after the shipment is receive. In question 6, the representatives strongly

    agreed that records of returned medicines are maintained in a register, with the

    computed weighted mean of 4.73. In question 7, the representatives strongly

    agreed that the head office should be notified immediately in case of any

    discrepancies, with the computed weighted mean of 4.97. With the computed

    weighted mean of 4.83, the respondents strongly agreed that defective or poor

    quality stocks are not sold. In the ninth question, the result shows that the branch

    manager checks the items received to determine conformance with requirements

    and specifications, with the computed weighted mean of 4.97.

    In summary, supply chain relative to delivery and receiving resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.90

    Table 13 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to handling and storage.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    13/45

    61

    Table 13

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Supply Chain Relative to

    Handling and Storage

    Handling StorageWeighted

    MeanVerbal

    Interpretation

    1. There are adequate storage facilities.4.70 Strongly

    Agree

    2. Stocks are stored on ranks, shelves or incupboards to prevent ingress of moisture, dirtand other contaminants.

    4.83

    StronglyAgree

    3. The stockroom within the drugstore is spacious

    and kept clean. 4.97

    Strongly

    Agree

    4. There is observed proper stocking arrangementof medicines. 4.93

    StronglyAgree

    5. Stocks of medicines are kept in the storeroom orbodega. 4.63

    StronglyAgree

    6. There is an appropriate storage of medicines toensure that potency and physical integrity ismaintained.

    4.93

    StronglyAgree

    7. Medicines are stored within each temperature

    and security zone to protect against damage. 4.86

    Strongly

    Agree

    8. The medicines are stored according to itsmanufacturer (pharmaceutical or othersuppliers).

    4.60

    StronglyAgree

    9. The medicines are stored based on their nameIn alphabetical order. 4.73

    StronglyAgree

    10. The medicines are stored according to theirtherapeutic class (based on their functions). 4.70

    StronglyAgree

    11. Received stocks unchecked are segregatedfrom the usual shelf stocks. 4.43

    Agree

    12. The medicines are stocked/segregatedaccording to dosage forms, eye drops,

    rotacaps,ointments etc), is stored on different shelves.

    4.63

    StronglyAgree

    13. All items from stock room are recorded in stockrecord. 4.76

    StronglyAgree

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    14/45

    62

    14. Periodic audits should be carried out to checkfor consumption against actual recorded use(prescription records, stock records, etc.) toexpose any theft/misuse.

    4.83

    StronglyAgree

    15. Properly checked medicines are ready for sale.

    4.83

    Strongly

    Agree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.76StronglyAgree

    Table 13 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to handling and storage. In question 1, the result shows that there

    are adequate storage facilities, with a computed weighted mean of 4.70. In the

    next question, the result shows that the branch representatives strongly agreed

    that stocks are stored on ranks, shelves or in cupboards to prevent ingress of

    moisture, dirt and other contaminants, with the computed weighted mean of 4.83.

    In question 3, respondents strongly agreed that the stockroom within the

    drugstore is spacious and kept clean, with the computed weighted mean of 4.97.

    With the computed mean of 4.93, branch representatives strongly agreed that

    there is observed proper stocking arrangement of medicines. With the computed

    weighted mean of 4.63, the branch representatives agree stocks of medicines

    are kept in the storeroom or bodega. In question 6, the representatives strongly

    agreed that there is an appropriate storage of medicines to ensure that potency

    and physical integrity is maintained, with the computed weighted mean of 4.93. In

    question 7, the representatives strongly agreed medicines are stored within each

    temperature and security zone to protect against damage, with the computed

    weighted mean of 4.86. With the computed weighted mean of 4.60, the

    respondents strongly agreed that the medicines are stored according to its

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    15/45

    63

    manufacturer (pharmaceutical or other suppliers).In the ninth question, the result

    shows that the medicines are stored based on their name in alphabetical order,

    with the computed weighted mean of 4.73. In question 10, respondents strongly

    agreed that the medicines are stored according to their therapeutic class (based

    on their functions), with the computed weighted mean of 4.70. With the computed

    mean of 4.43, the branch representatives agree that received stocks unchecked

    are segregated from the usual shelf stocks. With the computed weighted mean of

    4.63, the branch representatives strongly agree that the medicines are

    stocked/segregated according to dosage forms, eye drops, rotacaps, ointments

    etc), is stored on different shelves. In question 13, the branch representatives

    strongly agreed that all items from the stock room are recorded in a stock record,

    with the computed weighted mean of 4.76. In question 14, the representatives

    strongly agreed medicines that periodic audits should be carried out to check for

    consumption against actual recorded use (prescription records, stock records,

    etc.) to expose any theft/misuse, with the computed weighted mean of 4.83. In

    question 15, the representatives strongly greed medicines that properly checked

    medicines are ready for sale, with the computed weighted mean of 4.83.

    In summary, supply chain relative to handling and storage resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.76.

    Table 14 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to inventory issuance.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    16/45

    64

    Table14

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Supply Chain Relative to

    Inventory Issuance

    Table 14 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply chain

    relative to inventory issuance. In question 1, the result shows that the

    respondents strongly agreed that products sold are properly recorded to assure

    that no drugs are sold, with a computed weighted mean of 4.93. In the next

    question, the result shows that the branch representatives strongly agreed that

    periodic checking for the expiry dates of medicines are done, with the computed

    weighted mean of 4.87. In question 3, respondents strongly agreed that

    erroneous medicines purchased and returned by clients is verified by the

    delegated personnel, with the computed weighted mean of 4.57. With the

    computed mean of 4.07, branch representatives agree that discounts are given

    Inventory Issuance WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. Products sold are properly recorded to assurethat no drugs are lost.

    4.93 StronglyAgree

    2. Periodic checking for the expiry dates ofmedicines that there will be no expired medicinessold.

    4.87

    StronglyAgree

    3. Erroneous medicines purchased and returnedby clients is verified by the delegated personnel. 4.57

    StronglyAgree

    4. Discounts are given to senior citizenconsumers.

    4.07 Agree

    5. Products sold are properly deducted from theinventory balance.

    4.73 StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.63StronglyAgree

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    17/45

    65

    to senior citizen consumers. With the computed weighted mean of 4.73, branch

    representatives strongly agreed that products sold are properly deducted from

    the inventory balance.

    In summary, supply chain relative to inventory issuance resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.63.

    Table 15 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to disposal of spoiled and expired drugs.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    18/45

    66

    Table 15

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Supply Chain Relative to

    Disposal of Spoiled and Expired Drugs

    Disposal of Spoiled and Expired Drugs WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. Periods for retrieval of expired medicinesfrom the shelves are set.

    4.83 StronglyAgree

    2. During checking of expiry, the personnelinvolved removes medicines that arenearing expiry.

    4.83

    StronglyAgree

    3. Records are maintained for expired medicines

    and how they are disposed off.

    4.93 Strongly

    Agree4. A separate area is designated (cupboard or

    shelf), and is adequately marked asEXPIRED GOODS-NOT FOR SALE tostore all expired stocks.

    4.83

    StronglyAgree

    5. The expired medicines collected are sentback to the supplier or company forappropriate disposal.

    4.73

    StronglyAgree

    6. In case of medicines that are not returnable tosuppliers, procedures for disposal arefollowed by the pharmacy on conjunction

    with the BFAD.

    4.63

    StronglyAgree

    7. In case of medicines that are not returnable tosuppliers are disposed by burning itscontainer.

    4.43 Agree

    8. Not returnable tablets and capsules tosuppliers are disposed through a bucket ofwater.

    4.70

    StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.74 StronglyAgree

    Table 15 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to disposal of spoiled and expired drugs. In question 1, the result

    shows that the respondents strongly agreed that periods for retrieval of expired

    medicines from the shelves are set, with a computed weighted mean of 4.83. In

    the next question, the result shows that the branch representatives strongly

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    19/45

    67

    agreed that during the checking of expiry, the personnel involved removes

    medicines that are nearing expiry, with the computed weighted mean of 4.83. In

    question 3, respondents strongly agreed that records are maintained for expired

    medicines and how they are disposed off, with the computed weighted mean of

    4.93. With the computed mean of 4.83, the branch representatives agree that a

    separate area is designated (cupboard or shelf), and is adequately marked as

    EXPIRED GOODS-NOT FOR SALE to store all expired stocks. With the

    computed weighted mean of 4.73, branch representatives strongly agreed that

    the expired medicines collected are sent back to the supplier or company for

    appropriate disposal. In question 6, the representatives strongly agreed that in

    case of medicines that are not returnable to suppliers, procedures for disposal

    are followed by the pharmacy on conjunction with the BFAD, with the computed

    weighted mean of 4.63. In question 7, the representatives agree In case of

    medicines that are not returnable to suppliers are disposed by burning its

    container, with the computed weighted mean of 4.43. With the computed

    weighted mean of 4.70, the respondents strongly agreed that not returnable

    tablets and capsules to suppliers are disposed through a bucket of water.

    In summary, supply chain relative to inventory issuance resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.74.

    4. Financial Implications

    Table 16 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to accounting policies and procedures.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    20/45

    68

    Table 16

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Supply Chain Relative to

    Accounting Policies and Procedures

    Table 16 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to accounting policies and procedures. In question 1, the result

    shows that the company uses periodic inventory system to reconcile the actual

    count of drugs, with a computed weighted mean of 5.00. In the next question, the

    result shows that the branch representatives agree that all related costs of drugs

    are properly accounted for in order to come up with appropriate income for the

    period, with the computed weighted mean of 4.20. In question 3, respondents

    strongly agreed that twenty percent (20%) discounts for senior citizens are

    properly accounted for to reflect accurate and reliable income, with the computed

    weighted mean of 5.00.

    In summary, supply chain relative to accounting policies and procedures

    resulted to an average weighted mean of 4.73.

    Accounting Policies and Procedures WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. The company uses periodic inventory systemto reconcile inventory records with the actualcount of drugs.

    5.00

    StronglyAgree

    2. All related costs of drugs are properlyaccounted for in order to come up withappropriate income for the period.

    4.20 Agree

    3. Twenty percent (20%) discounts for seniorcitizens are properly accounted for to reflectaccurate and reliable income.

    5.00

    StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean4.73 Strongly

    Agree

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    21/45

    69

    Table 17 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of financial

    implications relative to source documents.

    Table17

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Financial Implications

    Relative to Source Documents

    Source Documents WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. Purchase orders are issued to pharmaceutical

    companies and other suppliers for regularplacement of drugs to avoid possible stock outs. 4.47 Agree

    2. Receiving reports are prepared by the branch tocheck the quantity and quality of drugs received. 5.00

    StronglyAgree

    3. Damaged and expired medicines are returned andrecorded in the appropriate register. 4.87

    StronglyAgree

    4. Sales of drugs are supported by official receiptupon payment of customers.

    5.00StronglyAgree

    5. Daily sales summaries are prepared and agreed

    to the invoices issued. 4.87

    Strongly

    Agree6. Reports, such as sales and inventory reports are

    generated on a daily basis.4.73

    StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.82 StronglyAgree

    Table 17 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to source documents. In question 1, the result shows that the

    respondents agreed that purchase orders are issued to pharmaceutical

    companies and other suppliers for regular placement of drugs to avoid possible

    stock outs, with a computed weighted mean of 4.47. In the next question, the

    result shows that the branch representatives strongly agreed that receiving

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    22/45

    70

    reports are prepared by the branch to check the quantity and quality of drugs

    received, with the computed weighted mean of 5.00. In question 3, respondents

    strongly agreed that Damaged and expired medicines are returned and recorded

    in the appropriate register, with the computed weighted mean of 4.87. With the

    computed mean of 5.00, the branch representatives agree that sales of drugs are

    supported by official receipt upon payment of customers. With the computed

    weighted mean of 4.87, branch representatives strongly agreed that daily sales

    summaries are prepared and agreed to the invoices issued. In question 6, the

    representatives strongly agreed that reports, such as sales and inventory reports

    are generated on a daily basis, with the computed weighted mean of 4.73.

    In summary, supply chain relative to source documents resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.82.

    Table 18 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of financial

    implications relative to books of accounts.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    23/45

    71

    Table 18

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Financial Implications

    Relative to Book of Accounts

    Books of Accounts WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. Financial records are kept in the branch andproperly updated by knowledgeable personnel.

    5.00 StronglyAgree

    2. Financial records are only accessible toauthorized personnel.

    4.87 StronglyAgree

    3. Computer and programs are used to maintainand update financial records.

    4.60 StronglyAgree

    4. The branch books of accounts are maintainedproperly for safe keeping purposes. 5.00 Strongly

    Agree

    5. Reports and record are checked by anaccountant provided by the head office.

    3.00Undecided

    6. Financial reports are submitted directly to theaccounting department of the head office.

    4.47Agree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.49 Agree

    Table 18 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to books of accounts. In question 1, the result shows that the

    respondents agreed that financial records are kept in the branch and properly

    updated by knowledgeable personnel, with a computed weighted mean of 5.00 In

    the next question, the result shows that the branch representatives strongly

    agreed that financial records are only accessible to authorized personnel, with

    the computed weighted mean of 4.87. In question 3, respondents strongly agreed

    that computer and programs are used to maintain and update financial records,

    with the computed weighted mean of 4.60. With the computed mean of 5.00, the

    branch representatives agree that the branch books of accounts are maintained

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    24/45

    72

    properly for safe keeping purposes. With the computed weighted mean of 3.00,

    branch representatives are undecided whether the reports and record are

    checked by an accountant provided by the head office. In question 6, the

    representatives strongly agreed that financial reports are submitted directly to the

    accounting department of the head office, with the computed weighted mean of

    4.47.

    In summary, supply chain relative to book of accounts resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.49.

    Table 19 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of financial

    implications relative to tax implications.

    Table 19

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Financial Implications

    Relative to Tax Implications

    Tax Implications WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. Prices for drugs are all tax inclusive. 5.00 StronglyAgree

    2. The branch complies with NIRC rulings as toregistration, keeping of accounting records,issuance of sales invoice and official receiptswithholding taxes and tax returns.

    4.87

    StronglyAgree

    3. The branch does not employ tax avoidancepractices.

    4.47 Agree

    4. The branch practices the pre-assessment schemein determining the tax amount to be paid.

    4.33Agree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.67 StronglyAgree

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    25/45

    73

    Table 19 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to tax implications. In question 1, the result shows that the

    respondents strongly agreed that prices for drugs are all tax inclusive, with a

    computed weighted mean of 5.00 In the next question, the result shows that the

    branch representatives strongly agreed that the branch complies with NIRC

    rulings as to registration, keeping of accounting records, issuance of sales

    invoice and official receipts withholding taxes and tax returns, with the computed

    weighted mean of 4.87. In question 3, respondents agreed that the branch does

    not employ tax avoidance practices, with a computed weighted mean of 4.47.

    With the computed mean of 4.33, the branch representatives agree that the

    branch practices the pre-assessment scheme in determining the tax amount to

    be paid.

    In summary, supply chain relative to tax implications resulted to an

    average weighted mean of 4.67.

    Table 20 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of financial

    implications relative to financial statements and reporting.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    26/45

    74

    Table 20

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Financial Implications

    Relative to Financial Statements and Reporting

    Financial Statements and Reporting WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. Accounts are properly classified (as to assets,liabilities, capital, revenue and expenses) in thefinancial statements.

    4.83

    StronglyAgree

    2. The branch adopts the concept of accrual basis(events are recognized when they occur) torecord and report transactions in the financial

    statements of the period which they relate.4.33 Agree

    3. The branch prepares financial statements on theassumption that the entity is going concern.

    5.00 StronglyAgree

    4. The branch prepares the complete set of financialstatements and sees to it that it is understandable,reliable, relevant and comparable.

    5.00 StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean 4.79 StronglyAgree

    Table 20 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of supply

    chain relative to financial statements and reporting. In question 1, the result

    shows that the respondents strongly agreed that the accounts are properly

    classified (as to assets, liabilities, capital, revenue and expenses) in the financial

    statements, with a computed weighted mean of 4.83. In the next question, the

    result shows that the branch representatives agree that the branch adopts the

    concept of accrual basis (events are recognized when they occur) to record and

    report transactions in the financial statements of the period which they relate,

    with the computed weighted mean of 4.33. In question 3, respondents strongly

    agreed that the branch prepares financial statements on the assumption that the

    entity is going concern, with a computed weighted mean of 5.00. With the

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    27/45

    75

    computed mean of 5.00, the branch representatives strongly agree that the

    branch prepares the complete set of financial statements and sees to it that it is

    understandable, reliable, relevant and comparable.

    In summary, supply chain relative to financial statements and reporting

    resulted to an average weighted mean of 4.79.

    5. Problems Encountered and Proposed Solutions

    Table 21 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of

    problems encountered concerning the supply chain.

    Table 21

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Problems Encountered

    Problems Encountered WeightedMean

    VerbalInterpretation

    1. The branch frequently receives damaged drugsfrom suppliers. 2.93 Disagree

    2. The branch experience expired and damageddrugs from suppliers.

    2.97Agree

    3. The same person is in control of inventoryrecords and inventory handling.

    3.60Undecided

    4. Damaged and expired drugs that cannot bereturned to suppliers are still in the storage.

    3.17Undecided

    5. The branch experience transport damages onordered drugs.

    2.83Undecided

    Average Weighted Mean 3.10

    Agree

    Table 21 shows the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of problems

    encountered concerning the supply chain s. In question 1, the result shows that

    the respondents disagree that the branch frequently receives damaged drugs

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    28/45

    76

    from supplier, with a computed weighted mean of 2.93. In the next question, the

    result shows that the branch representatives disagree that the branch experience

    expired and damage drugs from suppliers, with the computed weighted mean of

    2.97. In question 3, respondents agree that the branch books of accounts are

    maintained properly for safe keeping purposes, with the computed weighted

    mean of 3.60. With the computed mean of 3.17, the branch representatives are

    undecided whether damaged and expired drugs that cannot be returned to

    suppliers are still in the storage. With the computed weighted mean of 2.83,

    branch representatives are undecided whether the branch experience transport

    damages on ordered drugs.

    In summary, the problems encountered resulted to an average weighted

    mean of 3.10.

    Table 22 presents the weighted mean and verbal interpretation of

    proposed solutions regarding the supply chain.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    29/45

    77

    Table 22

    Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of Proposed Solutions

    Proposed SolutionsWeighted

    MeanVerbal

    Interpretation

    1. The branch checks the availability of drugs at thestockroom before ordering. 4.87

    StronglyAgree

    2. The branch always check the order form uponreceiving of ordered drugs. 4.93

    StronglyAgree

    3. Inventory record are restricted only to authorizepersonnel. 4.93

    StronglyAgree

    4. The branch uses mirrors to monitor activitiesinside the store to prevent loss and theft. 4.77

    StronglyAgree

    5. The branch maintains periodic decision aboutexpired and damaged drugs. 4.70

    StronglyAgree

    6. Stocks are handled properly as to minimizetransport damages. 4.87

    StronglyAgree

    7. The branch has personnel responsible forcontrolling transfers in and out of storage areas. 4.83

    StronglyAgree

    8. There is adequate space and fixed layouts forordered medicines. 4.60

    StronglyAgree

    9. There is a designated place for all themedicines inside the drugstore. 4.63

    StronglyAgree

    10. Combinations of security measures are beinguse. 4.53

    StronglyAgree

    11. Proper personnel are responsible for developingand controlling inventory management process. 4.90

    Agree

    12. The personnel who are in charge mustimmediately report the missing item whether theitem was lost or stolen. 4.90

    StronglyAgree

    13. The branch assigns someone to be theInventory custodian for the department. 4.83

    StronglyAgree

    14. Separation of duties is one of the mostimportant control issues that should beaddressed. 4.40

    Agree

    15. The branch receiving department is responsiblefor the drugs and medicine delivered unlessdelegated to someone else. 4.50

    StronglyAgree

    Average Weighted Mean4.60

    StronglyAgree

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    30/45

    78

    Table 24 validates that the respondents strongly agreed to the proposed

    solutions. In question 1, the result shows that the branch checks the availability

    of drugs at the stockroom before ordering, with a computed weighted mean of

    4.87. In the next question, the result shows that the branches always check the

    order form upon receiving of ordered drugs, with the computed weighted mean of

    4.93. In question 3, respondents strongly agreed that the Inventory records are

    restricted only to authorize personnel, with the computed weighted mean of 4.93.

    With the computed mean of 4.77, branch representatives strongly agreed that the

    use mirrors to monitor activities inside the store to prevent loss and theft. With

    the computed weighted mean of 4.70, the branch representatives strongly

    agreed that the branch maintains periodic decision about expired and damaged

    drugs. In question 6, the representatives strongly agreed that stocks are handled

    properly as to minimize transport damages, with the computed weighted mean of

    4.87. In question 7, the representatives strongly agreed that the branch has

    employ personnel responsible for controlling transfers in and out of storage

    areas, with the computed weighted mean of 4.83. With the computed weighted

    mean of 4.60, the respondents strongly agreed that there is adequate space and

    fixed layouts for ordered medicines. In the ninth question, the result shows that

    there is a designated place for all the medicines inside the drugstore, with the

    computed weighted mean of 4.63. In question 10, respondents strongly agreed

    that combinations of security measures are being use, with the computed

    weighted mean of 4.53. With the computed mean of 4.90, the branch

    representatives strongly agreed that the proper personnel are responsible for

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    31/45

    79

    developing and controlling inventory management process. With the computed

    weighted mean of 4.90, the branch representatives strongly agreed that the

    personnel who are in charge must immediately report the missing item whether

    the item was lost or stolen. In question 13, the branch representatives strongly

    greed that the branch assigns someone to be the inventory custodian for the

    department, with the computed weighted mean of 4.83. In question 14, the

    representatives agreed that separation of duties is one of the most important

    control issues that should be addressed, with the computed weighted mean of

    4.40. In question 15, the representatives strongly agreed medicines that The

    branch receiving department is responsible for the drugs and medicine delivered

    unless delegated to someone else, with the computed weighted mean of 4.50.

    In summary, the problems encountered resulted to an average weighted

    mean of 4.60.

    8. Test of Significant Difference

    Table 23-31 presents the information collected regarding the difference between the

    branches business perspective and branch representatives profile and the lead

    variables which are interpreted using ANOVA. They were arranged according to their

    presentation in the survey instrument.

    Table 23 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to years of existence.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    32/45

    80

    Table 23

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Years of Existence

    Lead Variables

    F-computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 0.306 3.354

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 0.111 3.403

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 0.393 3.204

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 0.637 3.885

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 0.646 3.467

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 6.114 3.682

    Significant Reject

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.383 3.204

    NotSignificant

    AcceptHo

    Table 23 shows that the difference between the perspective of the branch

    when grouped according to the number of years of existence and the lead

    variables relative to product procurement, delivery and receiving, handling and

    storage, inventory issuance, disposal of spoiled and expired drugs and proposed

    solutions. Their F- computed values of 0.306, 0.111, 0.393, 0.637, 0.646 and

    0.383 are less than their F-tabular values of 3.354, 3.403, 3.204, 3.885, 3.467

    and 3.204 respectively; therefore, the null hypotheses are accepted. But the table

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    33/45

    81

    also shows that there is a significant difference between the years of existence

    and the problems encountered as evidenced by the f-computed value of 6.114

    which is greater than the F- tabular value of 3.682, therefore the hypothesis

    tested is rejected.

    Table 24 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to number of personnel in each branch.

    Table 24

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative toNumber of Personnel in Each Branch

    Lead Variables

    F-

    computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 1.557 3.354

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 0.301 3.403

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 1.271 3.204

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 0.639 3.885

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 0.770 3.467

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 11.925 3.682

    Significant RejectHo

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.136 3.204

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    34/45

    82

    Table 24 shows that the difference between the perspective of the branch

    when grouped according to the number of personnel and the lead variables

    relative to product procurement, delivery and receiving, handling and storage,

    inventory issuance, disposal of spoiled and expired drugs and proposed

    solutions. Their F- computed values of 1.577, 0.301, 1.271, 0.639, 0.770 and

    0.136 are less than their F-tabular values of 3.354, 3.403, 3.204, 3.885, 3.467

    and 3.204 respectively; therefore, the null hypotheses are accepted. But the table

    also shows that there is a significant difference between the number of personnel

    in each branch and the problems encountered as evidenced by the f-computed

    value of 11.925 which is greater than the F- tabular value of 3.682, therefore the

    hypothesis tested is rejected.

    Table 25 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to location.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    35/45

    83

    Table 25

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Location

    Lead Variables

    F-compute

    d value

    F-tabular

    Value

    Conclusio

    n Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 1.466 2.579

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 1.186 2.606

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 1.825 2.494

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 0.544 2.866

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 1.225 2.641

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 5.510 2.759

    Significant Reject

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.688 2.494

    NotSignificant

    AcceptHo

    Table 25 shows that the difference between the perspective of the branch

    when grouped according to location and the lead variables relative to product

    procurement, delivery and receiving, handling and storage, inventory issuance,

    disposal of spoiled and expired drugs and proposed solutions. Their F- computed

    values of 1.466, 1.186, 1.825, 0.544, 1.225 and 0.688 are less than their F-

    tabular values of 2.579, 2.606, 2.494, 2.866, 2.641 and 2.494 respectively;

    therefore, the null hypotheses are accepted. But the table also shows that there

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    36/45

    84

    is a significant difference between the location and the problems encountered as

    evidenced by the f-computed value of 5.510 which is greater than the F- tabular

    value of 2.759, therefore the hypothesis tested is rejected.

    Table 26 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to most saleable drugs.

    Table 26

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Most Saleable Drugs

    Lead Variables

    F-

    computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 0.160 4.414

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 4.356 4.494

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 4.885 4.171

    Significant RejectHo

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 0.438 5.318

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 0.667 4.600

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 70.741 4.965

    Significant Reject

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.071 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    37/45

    85

    Table 26 shows that the difference between the perspective of the branch

    when grouped according to most saleable drugs and the lead variables relative to

    product procurement, delivery and receiving, inventory issuance, disposal of

    spoiled and expired drugs and proposed solutions. Their F- computed values of

    0.160, 4.356, 0.438, 0.667 and0.071 are less than their F-tabular values of 4.414,

    4.494, 5.318, 4.600 and 4.171 respectively; therefore, the null hypotheses are

    accepted. But the table also shows that there is a significant difference between

    the most saleable drugs and the handling and storage and problems

    encountered as evidenced by the f-computed values of 4.885 and 70.741 which

    is greater than the F- tabular values of 4.171 and 4.965, therefore the hypothesis

    tested is rejected.

    Table 27 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to services rendered.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    38/45

    86

    Table 27

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Services Rendered

    Lead Variables

    F-computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 0.00032 4.414

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 0.178 4.494

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 0.023 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 0.305 5.318

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 0.860 4.600

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 28.303 4.965

    Significant Reject

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.862 4.171

    NotSignificant

    AcceptHo

    Table 27 shows that the difference between the perspective of the branch

    when grouped according to services rendered and the lead variables relative to

    product procurement, delivery and receiving, handling and storage, inventory

    issuance, disposal of spoiled and expired drugs and proposed solutions. Their F-

    computed values of 0.00032, 0.178, 0.023, 0.305, 0.860 and 0.862 are less than

    their F-tabular values of 4.414, 4.494, 4.171, 5.318, 4.600 and 4.171

    respectively; therefore, the null hypotheses are accepted. But the table also

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    39/45

    87

    shows that there is a significant difference between the services rendered and

    problems encountered as evidenced by the f-computed values of 28.303 which is

    greater than the F- tabular values of 4.965, therefore the hypothesis tested is

    rejected.

    Table 28 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to age.

    Table 28

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Age

    Lead Variables

    F-

    computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 1.003 3.354

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery andReceiving 0.680 3.403

    NotSignificant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 0.408 3.204

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 0.066 3.885

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 0.638 3.467

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 10.448 3.682

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.524 3.204

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    There was no significant difference between the profile of the branch

    representative when clustered according to age and the lead variables relating to

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    40/45

    88

    product procurement, delivery and receiving, handling and storage, inventory

    issuance, disposal of spoiled and expired drugs, proposed solutions. Their F-

    computed values of 1.003, 0.0680, 0.408, 0.066, 0.638 and 0.524 are less than

    their F- tabular values of 3.354, 3.403, 3.204, 3.885, 3.467 and 3.204

    respectively; therefore, the null hypotheses tested were accepted. But a

    significant difference existed between the respondents age and the problems

    encountered proven by the F- computed value of 10.448 which was greater than

    the F- tabular value of 3.682, therefore the hypothesis tested was rejected.

    Table 28 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to sex.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    41/45

    89

    Table 29

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Sex

    Lead Variables

    F-

    computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 3.948 4.414

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 0.002 4.494

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 0.066 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 0.622 5.318

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 0.317 4.600

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 4.693 4.965

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 3.092 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    Table 29 shows that there was no significant difference between the

    profile of the branch representative when clustered according to sex and all of

    the lead variables. This was evidenced by their F- computed values of 3.048,

    0.002, 0.066, 0.622, 0.317, 4.963, and 3.092 are less than their F- tabular values

    of 4.414, 4.494, 4.171, 5.318, 4.600, 4.965 and 4.171 respectively; therefore, the

    null hypotheses tested were accepted.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    42/45

    90

    Table 30 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to civil status.

    Table 30

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Civil Status

    Lead Variables

    F-

    computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 0.243 4.414Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 0.940 4.494

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 0.156 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 1.574 5.318

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiled

    and Expired Drugs 5.108 4.600

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    2. Problems Encountered 0.082 4.965

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.279 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    Table 30 shows that there was no significant difference between the

    profile of the branch representative when clustered according to civil status and

    the lead variables relating to product procurement, delivery and receiving,

    handling and storage, inventory issuance, disposal of spoiled and expired drugs,

    proposed solutions. Their F- computed values of 0.234, 0.940, 0.156, 1.574,

    0.082, and 0.279 are less than their F- tabular values of 4.414, 4.494, 4.171,

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    43/45

    91

    5.318, 4.600, 4.965 and 4.171 respectively; therefore, the null hypotheses tested

    were accepted. But a significant difference existed between the respondents civil

    status and the disposal of spoiled and expired drugs proven by the F- computed

    value of 5.108 which was greater than the F- tabular value of 4.600, therefore the

    hypothesis tested was rejected.

    Table 31 shows the difference between the lead variables and the branch

    perspective relative to highest educational attainment.

    Table 31

    Difference between the Lead Variables and the Branch Perspective Relative to

    Highest Educational Attainment

    Lead Variables

    F-

    computed

    value

    F-tabular

    Value Conclusion Decision

    1.Supply Chain

    1.1 Product Procurement 0.131 4.414

    Not

    Significant

    AcceptHo

    1.2 Delivery and

    Receiving 0.209 4.494

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.3 Handling and Storage 1.038 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.4 Inventory Issuance 1.574 5.318

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    1.5 Disposal of Spoiledand Expired Drugs 0.161 4.600

    NotSignificant

    AcceptHo

    2. Problems Encountered 0.482 4.965

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

    3. Proposed Solutions 0.478 4.171

    Not

    Significant

    Accept

    Ho

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    44/45

    92

    Table 31 shows that there was no significant difference between the

    profile of the branch representative when clustered according to highest

    educational attainment and all of the lead variables. This was evidenced by their

    F- computed values of 0.131, 0.209, 1.038, 1.574, 0.161, 0.482 and 0.478 were

    less than their F- tabular values of 4.414, 4.494, 4.171, 5.318, 4.600, 4.965 and

    4.171 respectively; therefore, the null hypotheses tested were accepted.

  • 7/27/2019 CHAPTER 4 Final Super

    45/45