chapter 3: understanding the role of...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-4
Chapter 3:Understanding the Role of Culture
PowerPoint byHettie A. Richardson
Louisiana State University
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-5
Opening Profile: Saudi Arabian Culture
The intersection of culture and business McDonald - restaurant different sections Women outnumber men in universities, own
20% of all businesses, but account for only 7%of the workforce
60% of workforce is foreign
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-6
Organizational Culture
Organizational cultures exist within and interact with societal culture
Examples: KLM’s travel-benefits policy:
Airline KLM responded to Dutch attitudes regarding families and norms regarding relationships by extending its travel benefits policy to any couple who formally registered as living together—regardless of whether the couple was heterosexual or homosexual, formally married or not.
McDonald’s in Russia: provides more extensive training to employees in Russia than to
those in the US because Russians are less familiar with working within a capitalist system.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-7
How does culture affect organizational processes?
Promotions, recruitment
Employment is for a lifetime
Employment can be ended
Motivation, rewards
Wisdom and luck are also needed
Hard work leads to success
Morale, productivity
People adjust to the environment
The environment is changeable
Planning, scheduling
Life is preordained
Individual influences future
Function AffectedAlternative U.S. Culture
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-8
Cultural Insensitivity
Self-reference criterion Example: Japanese courtesy in the US - Japanese workers must put
courtesy aside and interrupt conversations with Americans when there are problems.
Parochialism - when a person expects those from another culture to automatically fall into patterns of behavior common in his/her own culture
Ethnocentrism – describes the attitude of those who operate from the assumption their ways of doing things are best under all conditions Example: Proctor & Gamble: P & G demonstrated ethnocentrism when
they ran a popular European ad for Camay soap in Japan. The ad depicted a man walking in on his wife in the bath. The commercial backfired in Japan because the Japanese viewed the man’s behavior as bad manners.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-9
Influences on National Culture Kinship – the system adopted by a given society to guide
family relationships. In the US, this system consists primarily of the nuclear family. In some other countries the system consists of the extended family. In the latter case, family loyalty may be given primary consideration in corporate activities
Education - The formal and informal education received by workers influences the expectations placed on those workers and managers’ choices about recruitment, staffing, training, and leadership.
Economy - The economic system influences sourcing, distribution, incentives, and reparation of capital.
Politics - The government imposes varying constraints on organizations and their freedom to do business.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-10
Influences on National Culture
Religion McDonald’s does not serve beef or pork in India out of respect for
Hindus and Muslims. In Saudi Arabia, Islamic law prohibits the charging of interest.
Associations - Various associations arise from the formal and informal groups that make up a society
Health - A country’s system of health affects employee productivity, expectations, and attitudes toward physical fitness, which in turn affect decisions about health care benefits, insurance, physical facilities, and sick days.
Recreation - Workers’ attitudes about recreation can affect their work behavior and their perception of the role of work in their lives.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-11
Management Focus: China Protects its Culture
Restrictions against foreign books, the internet, video games, and performing acts
Increased censorship of foreign television programs
Joint operation of television channels by Chinese broadcasters and foreign investors banned
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-12
Cultural Value Dimensions Values are ideas about what is good or bad
Values determine how individuals probably will act in given circumstances. They are communicated via the eight subsystems just described and are passed down through generations
Help managers anticipate likely cultural effects Contingency management requires managers to adapt to the
local environment and people and to adjust their management styles accordingly
Allow for contingency management
Can vary across subcultures Value dimensions and resulting cultural profiles provide
only an approximation of national character. There may be variations in national culture i.e., subcultures may exist as well. For example,
American tend to think of the Chinese as culturally homogenous, but distinct ethnic groups within China have their own customs and dialects.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-13
Project GLOBE DimensionsThe GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational BehaviorEffectiveness) dimensions are based on data gathered by 170researchers over seven years. The data were collected from18,000 managers in sixty-two countries. There are nine dimensions that distinguish cultures from one
another and have implications for managers: assertiveness, future orientation, performance orientation, humane orientation, gender differentiation, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, institutional collectivism vs. individualism, and in-group collectivism.
Only four are discussed in the text because the other five overlap with Hofstede’s dimensions.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-14
Project GLOBE Dimensions Assertiveness: concerns how much people are expected to be
tough, confrontational, and competitive versus modest and tender. Low assertiveness countries have sympathy for the weak and emphasize loyalty and solidarity. Low: Sweden, New Zealand, Switzerland High: Greece, Austria, Germany
Performance orientation: concerns the importance of performance improvement and excellence and refers to whether people are encouraged to strive for continued improvement. Low performance orientation countries place priority on things like tradition, loyalty, family, and background. They associate competition withdefeat. Low: Russia, Argentina, Greece High: New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-15
Project GLOBE Dimensions Future orientation - refers to the importance a society attaches to future-
oriented behaviors, such as planning and investing in the future. High future orientation countries tend to save and have a longer time horizon for decisions. Low future orientation countries are the opposite. Low: Russia, Argentina, Poland High: Netherlands, Switzerland, Singapore
Humane orientation - Human orientation concerns the extent to which a society encourages and rewards being fair, altruistic, generous, caring, and kind. Paternalism and patronage, tolerance, and harmony are values in high humane orientation cultures. In low humane orientation cultures people value power, material possessions, and self-enhancement.
Low: Germany, Spain, France High: Malaysia, Ireland, Philippines
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-16
Hofstede’s DimensionsHofstede’s research, which was conducted prior to theGLOBE project, is based on 116,000 people in 50countries. Nonetheless, all of the research wasconducted in a single firm—IBM. As such, the resultshould be interpreted with caution.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-17
Hofstede’s Dimensions Power distance – is a society’s acceptance of unequal power distribution.
Low: Denmark, Israel, Austria - superiors and subordinates are more likely to view one another as equals, leading to more cooperation.
High: Malaysia, Arab countries, Mexico - formal authority and hierarchy are very respected.
Uncertainty avoidance - the extent to which people feel threatened by ambiguous situations. Low: India, Denmark, Singapore - are more comfortable with
ambiguity. In these cultures, company activities are less formal and structured, managers take more risks, and employees have more job mobility.
High: Greece, Japan, France - very uncomfortable with ambiguity and tend to have strict laws and closely followed procedures. Managers tend to make low-risk decisions, employees are not aggressive, and lifetime employment is common
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-18
Hofstede’s Dimensions
Individualism vs. collectivism - the tendency for people to look after themselves and their immediate families only and to neglect the needs of society Individual: Australia, US, UK Collective: Italy, Korea, Singapore
Masculinity vs. femininity - Masculinity refers to the degree to which traditionally masculine values (e.g., assertiveness, materialism, and lack of concern for others) prevail. Femininity emphasizes the traditionally feminine values of concern for others, relationships, and quality of life. In more feminine cultures one tends to find less work-family conflict, less job stress, more women in high-level jobs, and a reduced need for assertiveness.
Masculine: Japan, Mexico, Germany Feminine: Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-19
Hofstede’s Dimensions
Long-term/short-term orientation Long-term: Germany, China, Japan,
Taiwan Short-term: US, Canada, UK e.g. quarterly
report
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-22
Variables Causing Problems for Americans Time
“Tomorrow” - In Latin America the word for tomorrow is used to mean “sometime in the future.”
Change Many non-Western societies believe in destiny of the will of their God
and, thus, tend to be passive and hostile toward change.
Material factors Americans tend to value physical goods and status symbols. Many
non-Westerners value the aesthetic and spiritual realm instead.
Individualism In the US, individual achievement takes precedent. There is a focus on
“I.” In countries like China, there is more emphasis on conformity and cooperation.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-23
The Internet and Culture 70% of Korean homes have high-speed
internet service
Sweden has refused to allow airline passenger information (e.g., meal preferences) to be transmitted to the US
75% of the world’s internet market lives outside the US
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-24
Comparative Management in Focus: Japan “Wa”—peace and harmony
A mix of authoritarianism and humanism in the workplace
Emphasis on participative management, consensus, and duty
Open expression and conflict discouraged
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-25
Comparative Management in Focus: Germany Preference for rules and order, privacy
Dislike of inefficiency and tardiness
Assertive, but not aggressive
Organizations are centralized but still favor consensus decision-making
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-26
Comparative Management in Focus: South Korea Respect family, authority, formality, class
Are demonstrative, friendly, aggressive, hard-working
Connections vital for business, contracts are oral
Honest criticism is rare
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-27
Applying Cultural Profiles to Management: Chinese Family Business
Small, family businesses predominate – not true today, it is the government-owned business that are predominate
“Guanxi”—connections
Organizations do not include “middle management”
Today, younger Chinese managers are integrating both Western and Chinese management styles to some extent.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-28
Chapter 4:Communicating across Cultures
PowerPoint byHettie A. Richardson
Louisiana State University
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-29
Opening Profile: Keeping Your Foot out of Your Mouth
Small slips can be big errors: “Hello, wife of the boss” “Thank you for your hostility” - hospitality Patting someone on the head Do you shake hands, bow, hug, or kiss when
meeting someone? International managers may spend between
50% and 90% of their time communicating.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-30
Cultural Noise
American: He refuses to take responsibility.Greek: I asked for an order.
Greek: “I don’t know. How long should it take?”
American: I asked him to participate.Greek: He is the boss. Why doesn’t he tell me?
American: “How long will it take to finish this report?”
AttributionBehavior
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-31
Trust in Communication
Business transactions based on long-standing vs. arm’s length relationships
High propensity to trust: Nordic countries, China, Canada, US, Britain
Low propensity to trust: Brazil, Turkey, Romania, Slovenia, Latvia
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-32
The GLOBE Project and Communication
High performance orientation (e.g., US) present objective information directly and explicitly
Low assertiveness (e.g., Sweden) two-way discourse and friendly relationships
High humane orientation (e.g., Ireland) avoid conflict, be supportive
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-33
Cultural Variables in Communication
Roles
Language “Come out of the grave with Pepsi” –
translation issues When “yes” doesn’t mean “yes”
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-34
Cultural Variables in Communication
Nonverbal communication Kinesic behavior (e.g., sticking out the tongue in China) Proxemics (e.g., the corner office, closeness when
talking) Paralanguage (e.g., clothing, the sound of silence) Object language (e.g., office design and furniture,
clothing, cars, cosmetics and time) monochronic – linear time concept polychronic - many things happening simultaneously
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-37
Comparative Management in Focus: Communicating with Arabs
Arabs are quick to “sound off”
Communication is built on friendship, honor, hospitality
Arabs are high-contact communicators
Time is key in communication process
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-38
Information Technology
Global reach does not necessarily mean global business
The web is impersonal, but may require greater cultural sensitivity
There is a predicted annual growth rate of 70% for non-English-language cites and usage
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-39
Managing Cross-cultural Communication
Develop cultural sensitivity Anticipate the meaning the receiver will get
Careful encoding Use words, pictures, and gestures Avoid slang, idioms, regional sayings
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall 3-40
Managing Cross-cultural Communication
Selective transmission Build relationships face-to-face if possible
Careful decoding of feedback Get feedback from multiple parties Improve listening and observation skills
Follow-up actions