chap013 relevant costs for decision making
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
11th EditionChapter 13
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Relevant Costs for Decision Making
Chapter Thirteen
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Learning Objectives
• 1. Identification of relevant costs.• 2. Drop or retain a segment.• 3. Make or buy decision.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost Concepts for Decision Making
A relevant cost is a cost that differs between alternatives.
1
2
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or in part) by choosing one alternative over in part) by choosing one alternative over
another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.
Two broad categories of costs are never Two broad categories of costs are never relevant in any decision and include: relevant in any decision and include: Sunk costs. Sunk costs. is a cost that has already been
incurred and cannot be avoided regardless of what a manager decides to do.
Future costs that Future costs that do not differdo not differ between the between the alternatives.alternatives.
An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or in part) by choosing one alternative over in part) by choosing one alternative over
another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.
Two broad categories of costs are never Two broad categories of costs are never relevant in any decision and include: relevant in any decision and include: Sunk costs. Sunk costs. is a cost that has already been
incurred and cannot be avoided regardless of what a manager decides to do.
Future costs that Future costs that do not differdo not differ between the between the alternatives.alternatives.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Relevant Cost Analysis: A Two-Step Process
Eliminate costs and benefits that do not differ between alternatives.
Use the remaining costs and benefits that do differ between alternatives in making the decision. The costs that remain are the differential, or avoidable, costs.
Step 1
Step 2
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Different Costs for Different Purposes
Costs that are relevant in one
decision situation may not be relevant in another context.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Adding/Dropping Segments
One of the most important decisions managers make is whether to add or drop a business segment such as a
product or a store.
Let’s see how relevant costs should Let’s see how relevant costs should be used in this type of decision.be used in this type of decision.
One of the most important decisions managers make is whether to add or drop a business segment such as a
product or a store.
Let’s see how relevant costs should Let’s see how relevant costs should be used in this type of decision.be used in this type of decision.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision
When a company is involved in more than one activity When a company is involved in more than one activity in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. A decision to carry out one of the activities in the A decision to carry out one of the activities in the
value chain internally, rather than to buy externally value chain internally, rather than to buy externally from a supplier is called a “make or buy” decision.from a supplier is called a “make or buy” decision.
When a company is involved in more than one activity When a company is involved in more than one activity in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. A decision to carry out one of the activities in the A decision to carry out one of the activities in the
value chain internally, rather than to buy externally value chain internally, rather than to buy externally from a supplier is called a “make or buy” decision.from a supplier is called a “make or buy” decision.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision: An Example
• Essex Company manufactures part 4A that is used in one of its products.
• The unit product cost of this part is:
Direct materials $ 9 Direct labor 5 Variable overhead 1 Depreciation of special equip. 3 Supervisor's salary 2 General factory overhead 10 Unit product cost 30$
Direct materials $ 9 Direct labor 5 Variable overhead 1 Depreciation of special equip. 3 Supervisor's salary 2 General factory overhead 10 Unit product cost 30$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision
• The special equipment used to manufacture part 4A has no resale value.
• The total amount of general factory overhead, which is allocated on the basis of direct labor hours, would be unaffected by this decision.
• The $30 unit product cost is based on 20,000 parts produced each year.
• An outside supplier has offered to provide the 20,000 parts at a cost of $25 per part. Should we accept the supplier’s offer?Should we accept the supplier’s offer?
• The special equipment used to manufacture part 4A has no resale value.
• The total amount of general factory overhead, which is allocated on the basis of direct labor hours, would be unaffected by this decision.
• The $30 unit product cost is based on 20,000 parts produced each year.
• An outside supplier has offered to provide the 20,000 parts at a cost of $25 per part. Should we accept the supplier’s offer?Should we accept the supplier’s offer?
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make BuyOutside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip. 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
The Make or Buy Decision
20,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,000
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make BuyOutside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip. 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
The Make or Buy Decision
The special equipment has no resale The special equipment has no resale value and is a sunk cost.value and is a sunk cost.
The special equipment has no resale The special equipment has no resale value and is a sunk cost.value and is a sunk cost.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make BuyOutside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip. 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
The Make or Buy Decision
Not avoidable; irrelevant. If the product is dropped, it will be reallocated to other products.
Not avoidable; irrelevant. If the product is dropped, it will be reallocated to other products.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision
Should we make or buy part 4A?Should we make or buy part 4A?
Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make BuyOutside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip.(Not 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead(Not) 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Example 2
• Our Company manufactures a part for its production cycle. The costs per unit for 5,000 units of this part are as follows:
Direct materials $3Direct labor 5Variable factory overhead 4Fixed factory overhead 4Total costs $16
• The fixed factory overhead costs are
unavoidable. Spalding Corporation has offered to sell 5,000 units of the same part to our Company for $15 a unit. Assuming no other use for the facilities, Should Should we make or buy this partwe make or buy this part ?
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Example 3
• Crispy Company manufactures a part for its production cycle. The costs per unit for 5,000 units of this part are as follows:
• Direct materials $3• Direct labor 5• Variable factory overhead 4• Fixed factory overhead 2• Total costs $14• • The fixed factory overhead costs are unavoidable. • Assume that Crispy Company has been offered 5,000 units
of the part from another producer for $15 each. The facilities currently used to make the part could be rented out to another manufacturer for $20,000 a year. Crispy Company should MAKE OR BUY
• (calculate the advantage or disadvantage per unit).
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
End of Chapter 13End of Chapter 13