change: the dynamic forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...school-wide taks/teks (se...

13
Change: The Dynamic Force Laying a Foundation by Implementing Best Practices in a School-wide Program Rosemont Middle School, Fort Worth ISD © 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

Upload: others

Post on 12-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

Change: The Dynamic Force

Laying a Foundation by Implementing Best Practices in a School-wide Program

Rosemont Middle School, Fort Worth ISD

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

Page 2: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

Using PK-5 Methods in a Middle School Setting – an Elementary Approach • Methods from elementary bilingual classrooms

• Tiers for intervention • Core instruction and intervention • Inclusion • Progress monitoring and collection of data

• Methods from elementary administration • Focus on analysis & interpretation of data • Teaching teachers how to use data to impact the classroom • Analyzing, planning, designing, implementing and evaluating

programs & systems • Making change happen

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 2

Page 3: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change • Overview of 3 year program

• Distribution of administrative leadership • Effective master schedule • Quality school-based planning • Program monitoring matrix for administrators • Data management – access and use of data • Transfer of ownership and management of

program to teachers

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 3

Page 4: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change (cont.) • Overview of 3 year Program

• School-wide teams (college themes) • Eliminated pull-out tutoring • Strong discipline plan • School-wide test strategy (Book & Brain) • School-wide AVID classes (strategies) • School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated)

warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 4

Page 5: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change (cont.) • Overview of 3 year program

• Standardized learning environments through learning walks • Professional development in content and programs • Teacher leadership development • Team building • Embedded professional development at faculty meetings • Increased parental involvement • Parent portfolio conferences • Student leadership development

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 5

Page 6: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

Moving Through the Steps of Transformative Change (cont.) • Overview of 3 year program

• PACT and RTI at Rosemont • Administrator/interventionist • Tier monitoring/management • Student portfolio conferences • Teacher as primary interventionist (Stage 1) • Differentiated instruction and inclusion tutors • Inclusion for Special Education • Progress monitoring

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 6

Page 7: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

Data Summary Rosemont Middle School

TAKS 3 year comparison Report

2005-2006 Comparison Year

MID-YEAR REPORTS TAKS Performance

08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06

6th Grade (16 students)

Reading 13%

Math 6%

7th Grade

Writing Objective 58% 54% 80% 48% 90% 86% 85% 77%

Writing Comp 79% 93%

Reading 79% 70% 72% 54%

Math 46% 51% 49% 25%

8th Grade

Science 34% 41% 49% 29% 47% 47% 43% 41%

Social Studies 55% 69% 57% 53% 80% 84% 74% 75%

Reading 74% 75% 67% 54% 6-8 rdg 86% 87% 79% 70%

Math 53% 56% 44% 20% 6-8 mth 71% 71% 66%

59%

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 7

Page 8: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

   

Next Steps – The Establishment Stage – Building Capacity • Extending the existing program towards higher performance capacity

• Master schedule change – the “get it all” schedule • Exploratory problem solving course development • Teacher as primary interventionist (Stage 2) • AVID as an elective for every team • Balance every team with learners in all tiers • Data Analyst and Data Management Team • Implementation teacher performance monitoring piece • AP Algebra and English I in all 8th grade teams • Student ownership & leadership (Stage 2) • Parental involvement “stimulus” plan

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 8

Page 9: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

and 5t

h . 

9 © 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

 

 

Sample Documents – Administrator Schedule Monday  Tuesday  Wednesday  Thursday  Friday 

L  W  O  S  L  W  O  S  L  W  O  S  L  W  O  S  L  W  O S 

8:159: Faculty MeeOng  AVID 8:15‐9:00  English 8:15‐9:00 00  8:00‐9:00 

1  UT  UT 

BA YL OR

BA YL OR 

3  TCU  TCU 

Lunch 11:50‐12

:20 

A&M  A&M 

Class walkthrou

ghs and hall mon

itoring 

during passing periods. Lun

ch duty 4t

h

and 5t

h

LCT  LCT  UT  office  7  7  7 SS  SS  SS

Class

walkthrou

ghs and 

PAClass 

CT 

walkthrou

ghs and

mon

itorin

Class walkthrou

ghs and hall 

mon

itoring during passing 

period

s. Lun

ch duty 4t

h

hall

ADMIN.  office  office  7  7 SCI  SCI 

during passing 

OR

BA YLoffi ce 

PAoffi

CT

 ce 

MEETING Lunch  TCU 

11‐11:30 ASST. PRIN. 

PA

CT 

PA

CT 

Lunch  Lunch  Lunch  Lunch  7/8  7/8  Lunch  7/8 duty  11:50  duty  READ  READ  duty  READ 

Class walkthrou

ghs 

and hall mon

itoring 

Class walkthrou

ghs and hall mon

itoring during  11:50‐

. 12:20 

passing pe

riod

s. Lun

ch duty 4t

h  and 5t

h

A&M  Lunch  Lunch  8  8  Lunch  Lunch duty  duty  SCI  SCI  duty  duty

Class walkthrou

ghs and hall mon

itoring 

during passing periods. Lun

ch duty 4t

h

TTECH  TTECH  Lunch 2‐2:30 

7  TA’S  CLERKS 

8  UNT  UNT SMU  SMU 

office 

Lunch  Lunch 2:30‐3 2‐2:3 :00  0 

TTECH  Lunch  8  8  8 2‐2:30  SS  SS  SS 

aQend ance 

L  7/8  7/8 MATH  MATH 

SMU  SPED  SPED 

Lunch

3‐3:30

CAMP

US 

UNT  Class

walkthrou

ghs 

and hall

mon

itoring 

during passing2:45‐3:1

5 UNT  UNT SMU  SMU 

4:30  Football  Faculty MeeOng  Volleyball 5:30  5:30‐9:00  4:30‐5:30  5:30‐9:00 

Page 10: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

     

10 © 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

Principal Monitoring MatrixPRINCIPAL’S Overview InstrucOonal Monitoring:  Collegial Planning, Dept/Team Planning, Pyramid of IntervenOons, Subgroup AcOon Plans, Personnel Issues, New Teachers, TAKS Conferences, Parent Conferences Classroom Evidence:  DocumentaOon ReflecOve:  Summary of Concerns Other:  FaciliOes, Budgets, Grants, Student Services, CIP, CommiQees, Professional Development, Programs, CCC, SBDM, SIP, Title I, Counselors, Dept Chairs, Team Leaders, LCTs, Teacher Asst. Asst. Principals, TAP, Faculty, Team Builders, SPA Facilitators Other Monitored: 

Assistant  Counselors  LCTs  TAP  Team  Dept.  Teacher Asst.          SPA Facilitators  Team Builders  MeeOngs  Programs  IniOaOves Principals X  X  X  Leaders   X  Ch.  X  X 

Other Monitored: Asst  Supervision  EvaluaOon  Learning  Lesson Plan  Grades  Assessment  Student  DocumentaOon of  PACT  Discipline  AQendance Principal  PDAS  and  Walks  and  IntervenOons I,  MeeOngs  Monitoring  and  Concerns 

Content  Performance  Curriculum  II, III  Parents Issues 

4 High  Orsak  Orsak  Orsak  Orsak  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ  Orsak  WinseQ Performance Teams LCTs   Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ  Stephens  WinseQ 7/8 Split  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ  Stephens  WinseQ Language  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ  Stephens  WinseQ Center Reading  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ English  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ Social  Orsak  Orsak  Orsak  Orsak  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ Studies Math  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ Science  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ SPED  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  WinseQ  WinseQ LEP  Orsak  Orsak  Orsak  Orsak  WinseQ  WinseQ  Ii/III WinseQ  Both  WinseQ AQendance  WinseQ  II/III WinseQ  WinseQ ElecOves  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  Stephens  WinseQ  WinseQ  Both  Stephens  Stephens  WinseQ 

Page 11: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

11

Distributed Leadership

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

Sandi WinseQ  ChrisOne Orsak  Terrance Stephens  Lead Content Teachers  Counselors  IntervenOon Specialist 

Team Leaders Department Heads 

Office Assistants Crucial Personnel 

All Students Tiers II & III 

All Students Tier I 

All Students Tier I 

IdenOfy Dept Content Problems 

Test Coordinators Under WinseQ 

AcOon Planning for TEAM/Dept 

Maintain Student Profiles 

All Teams  UT, Baylor, TCU Texas Tech 

A&M, SMU, UNT  Balance Literacy in Contents 

Student Records  Work with LCTs   AQendance for Tutoring 

Math, Science, SPED Depts. 

Social Studies  Reading, ELA,  All ElecOves 

Observe and Model Lessons 

LPAC & Lau  Lesson Planning  Record Lesson Plan Record 

Campus Test Coordinator  Lunch Duty  Lunch Duty  Coach Teachers  Adopt‐A‐School Coordinators 

Cross Curriculum Planning 

Record Grade Book Record 

21st Century Grant AQendance 

Investment Capital Fund  Locker assignments  Lesson Plans and Curriculum 

Volunteer Coordinators  Set Model Classrooms  Calendar 

SSI  ALL ESL LPAC CommiQee 

School Safety & Security  InstrucOon and Pacing  PACT Records  IFL & Balanced Literacy  Test Prep 

AthleOc Events  AthleOc Events  AthleOc Events  Lead IFL  AQendance  New Teachers  Test Reports 

SES Program & AQendance 

Adv. Academics & AVID  CommunicaOons & Media 

Design Content Seminars  504  Maintain Student PorNolios 

Benchmark Scoring 

Student Handbook  Teacher Handbook 

Technology CommiQee  IdenOfy Student Tutoring Needs 

Counseling  TEAM and Department Mtg. 

Mini‐Assessment Scoring  

Teacher Assts.  Office Clerks  Technology Coordinator  Design Assessment  Campaigns  Monitor Student Grades  All Requested Reports 

Custodians  SubsOtutes  Buses  Lead review and interpret data 

PACT Conferences  Oversee Student Class AQendance 

SASI input for Asst. Principal 

AQendance Monitoring  Mentor Manager  Bus Liaison  Mentor New Teachers  RTI Conferences  Enforce Homework   INCLUSION Student Reports 

PACT Monitoring  Duty Schedule  Campus Monitors  Campus Staff Development 

Monitoring  SSI Student Reports 

Progress Monitoring  Textbooks  Jr. NaOonal Honor Society  School Improvement Professional Dev. 

Data DisaggregaOon   LEP Student Reports 

Assessment Monitoring  Scheduling  Radios  Daily AQendance Reports 

Tutoring Monitoring  Parental Involvement  Discipline CommiQee 

Page 12: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

12 © 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency

Weekly Administrator Report DOMAIN ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTION YOUR ACTIONS TAKEN RESULTS Instructional Management (Content) EXCEEDS EXPECTATION (Begin these lines with: Analyzed, Designed, Developed, Implemented, - promotes instruction improvement REQUIRES: Evaluated, Planned, Coordinated, Facilitated, etc…) - knows & uses data to drive programs and Excels in promoting the improvement of improvement instruction and is able to consistently utilize data - leads instruction in content and other resources to conceptualize innovative - revisits effectiveness of programs programs and practices which lead to improved - visits and reports upon all content classrooms (BS/ instruction. DD/AS/Sat) - has the knowledge of core problems in the content SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – PRIORITIES FOR IMPROVING STUDENT ACHEIVEMENT Instructional Monitoring to include Collegial Planning, Dept/Team Planning, Pyramid of Interventions, Subgroup Action Plans, Personnel Issues,

New Teachers, TAKS Conferences, Parent Conferences PRINCIPAL PROTOCOLS: Classroom Evidence supported by Documentation of Monitoring

Reflective Practices and Summary of Concerns AP Meeting Notes DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED: Team Agendas Department PACT Learning Walk Agend Parent TIER/TAK Walkthrough

Minutes Agenda Minutes Monitoring – Evidence a of Conference Log Conference Log Feedback Your students meetin Documentation

gs w/ Subord .

WINSETT REPORTS, AGENDAS, MONITORING: Progress Monitoring Tier II & III, Attendance Monitoring, PACT Monitoring, Grade Monitoring, Assessment Monitoring, Tutoring Monitoring ORSAK REPORTS, AGENDAS, MONITORING: Tier I Monitoring, LPAC Committee, AVID, Mentees/Mentors, Parental Involvement, Your Discipline, Performance Issues STEPHENS REPORTS, AGENDAS, MONITORING: Tier I Monitoring, School Safety, Technology, Jr. National Honor Society, Discipline Committee, Student Discipline School Improvement EXCEEDS EXPECTATION (Begin these lines with: Analyzed, Designed, Developed, Implemented, - 80% of instructional day (9:00-4:30) is invested in REQUIRES: Evaluated, Planned, Coordinated, Facilitated, etc…) school improvement efforts –TIME OUTSIDE YOUR Excels in promoting leadership in support of OFFICE school/organizational improvement efforts. - 20% of instructional day (9:00-4:30) is invested in paperwork – TIME INSIDE YOUR OFFICE Student Management EXCEEDS EXPECTATION (Do not list rudimentary solutions – list dynamic solutions such as - breaks cycles of negative student discipline by REQUIRES: mediation, PACT, School within a School, Credit Recovery, Contracts, providing appeals on behalf of the student Excels in promoting positive student conduct SST, TEAM Plans for Tardies, Discipline, Incomplete Work, Failures) - decreases the number of infractions from assigned through appropriate programs/practices. content teachers - improves student discipline by developing programs of intervention Academic Excellence Indicators EXCEEDS EXPECTATION You listed in your action plan: Campus Performance Indicators REQUIRES: 1. Individual Student Profiles – Closely monitor weekly - daily work demonstrates improvement in a Excels in making observable and commendable 2. Classroom Observation – Walkthroughs weekly substantial way progess toward defined criteria and objective. 3. Report Cards – Monitor number of I’s and F’s 6 weeks - leadership is tremendously effective in improving 4. Team Meetings – Address Agenda More than weekly lesson plans, grading, assessment, and tutoring within 5. Performance – Monitor student work each semester the assigned content 6. Parent Contact – Telephone Log (+’s & -‘s) weekly - progress towards CIP is evident and effectively 7. Demonstrated Student Improvement every three weeks communicated to the Principal and others

Page 13: Change: The Dynamic Forcebuildingrti.utexas.org/sites/default/files/...School-wide TAKS/TEKS (SE correlated) warm-ups • Effort based matrix for all testing ... TAKS 3 year comparison

      

Presenters Rosemont Middle School, Fort Worth ISD

• Yassmin Lee, Principal • Christine Orsak, Assistant Principal • Terrance Stephens, Assistant Principal • Sandi Winsett, Assistant Principal

© 2009 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency 13