challenging the status quo in the sacramento river...

21
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Balancing Life Safety with Ecological Health and Economic Sustainability: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valley and Delta Sara Schultz Water Resources Planner Sacramento District, USACE 20 April 2016

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

US Army Corps of EngineersBUILDING STRONG®

Balancing Life Safety with Ecological Health and Economic Sustainability: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valley and Delta

Sara SchultzWater Resources Planner Sacramento District, USACE20 April 2016

Page 2: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Sacramento River Watershed• City of Sacramento

one of most at risk cities for flooding

• Major losses of riparian and wetland habitat in region

Sacramento

Page 3: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Differing Regulatory Frameworks• Flood Management System established prior to ESA and other

Environmental Laws• The decline in native species has resulted in more stringent

environmental requirements• Flood and Environmental regulatory frameworks developed

independently largely without determining whether they can work together

• Conflicting requirements make operation of flood management system and establishment of new habitat problematic

3

Page 4: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Sacramento River General Reevaluation Report (GRR)

• Study to investigate the existing flood management system

• Evaluate re-operating, modifying, or improving the system for both flood risk management and ecosystem restoration

4

Page 5: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Guidance

5

Engineering Circular (EC) 1105-2-404 Planning Civil Works Projects under the

Environmental Operating Principles.

• Allows for multipurpose project planning• “Synergistic process whereby

environmental and economic considerations are effectively balanced…”

• “…strive to achieve the appropriate balance between the economic (Flood Risk Management) and environmental benefits provided by a project.

Page 6: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Historical Setting

6

Sacramento

Present day Sacramento with Yolo Bypass in foreground

Flooding in Sacramento in the 1800’s

Page 8: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Study Area Specifically focused on

the Flood Management System from Knight’s Landing to Collinsville

USACE missions focused on Flood Risk Management and Ecosystem Restoration

Seeking to improve the Flood Risk Management System for both purposes

8

Page 9: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Problems

High risk of flooding threatens public safety, property and critical infrastructure

Riparian and aquatic ecosystem has been degraded and habitat connectivity has been lost

Restricted fish passage Existing regulatory framework for

flood and environmental resources do not support long term integrated management of dynamic systems

9

Page 10: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Future Without Project Conditions

10

• Assumptions on what studies and projects would be implemented in the near term

• Becomes the baseline to which we compare our alternatives

Page 11: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Fish and Wildlife Resources

11

Yellowbilled

Cuckoo

Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle

Delta Smelt

Green Sturgeon

Giant Garter Snake

Steelhead

Vernal Pool

Chinook Salmon

Institutional Significance 50 listed species Within Pacific Flyway

Technical Significance ESA listings based on scientific

and technical research Public Significance

Organizations formed to support resources Yolo Basin Foundation 2 State Wildlife Areas

Page 12: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Process to Develop Preliminary Alternatives

Followed the federal planning process with input from a team Charette, public scoping meetings and other stakeholder meetings:► Identified the problems in the study area,

the study objectives, the opportunities available, and the planning constraints.

► Developed measures to address problems and objectives.

► Developed an initial array of alternatives by combining measures.

► Formulated Ecosystem Restoration (ER), Flood Risk Management (FRM), and Joint Flood Risk Management & Ecosystem (FRM &ER) Alternatives

12

Sacramento Bypass

Page 13: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Process to Develop Preliminary Alternatives

• Initial Ecosystem Restoration (ER) only Alternatives• Locations with significant potential for ecosystem restoration• Gathered info from current projects/proposals/agency plans• Alternatives developed incrementally from small to large

• Initial Flood Risk Management (FRM) only Alternatives• Incremental approach to flood risk reduction while • Leveraging current projects/proposals/agency plans

• Initial Combined FRM &ER Alternatives• Focused on measures that would provide both FRM and ER benefits

• Weir modifications• Setback/removal of levees• Multi-purpose ring levees around small communities

• Supplemented with additional FRM only and ER only measures from current projects/proposals/agency plans

• Included 2 locally developed plans

13

Page 14: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Preliminary Initial Array of Alternatives

14

Fremont Weir

Page 15: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Ecosystem Restoration Alternative 2a

• Restore Shaded Riverine Aquatic habitat

• Improve habitat along the Tule Canal

• Restore and reconnect areas to the floodplain through setback levees

15

Page 16: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Flood Risk Management Alternative 6

• Expand Bypass – by removing levees

• Deconstruct the Sacramento Weir

• Construct new levee to protect established urban area

• Construct Ring Levees to protect small communities

• Promote non-structural risk reduction measures

16

Page 17: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Combined ER and FRM Alternative 1

• Expand Fremont Weir• Setback levees and restore

area reconnected to the floodplain

• Connect to the Deep Water Ship Channel to provide additional flood conveyance

• Construct Ring Levee for the small community of Hood

17

Page 18: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Combined ER and FRM Alternative 9• Expand the Fremont Weir• Construct setback levees in the

Yolo Bypass and restore the area reconnected to the floodplain

• Construct setback levees along the Sacramento River and establish planting berms

• Construct Ring Levee for the small community of Hood

18

Page 19: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

California Department of Water Resources Preferred Alternative

• Locally Developed Plan included in array of Alternatives

• Setback levees for improved conveyance capacity and restoration of habitat

• Widens Fremont Weir and adds capacity in the Ship Channel

19

Page 20: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Tentative Sacramento River GRR Schedule

20

April 2016

In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed

Late 2016

Summer 2017

Early 2018 Summer 2018

(Draft GRR/EIS/EIR)(Final GRR/EIS/EIR)

Spring/Summer 2017Early 2018

Page 21: Challenging the Status Quo in the Sacramento River Valleyconference.ifas.ufl.edu/NCER2016/presentations/21_1440_Schultz.pdf · April 2016 In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) as needed Late

BUILDING STRONG®

Questions?

21

Fremont Weir - 1963