challenges of cross border gas pipelines in south asia
TRANSCRIPT
CHALLENGES OF CROSS BORDER GAS
PIPELINES IN
SOUTH ASIA
E n g r . K h o n d k a r A b d u s S a l e q u e
( P e n g & F I E B )
Introduction
Opportunities, Prospects and
Challenges
IPI, TAPI, TRI-Nation Pipeline
Suggestions and
Recommendations
4/3
/20
13
2
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
CHALLENGES OF CROSS BORDER GAS PIPELINES
Introduction
4/3
/20
13
3
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…MAP OF SOUTH ASIA 4
/3/2
013
4
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
CROSS BORDER PIPELINES
Now most of the political debates are directed
towards ensuring the availability and security of
supply of energy.
The countries are caught in the grip with the
raising energy demand and prices
The energy crisis and debate over energy security
and sustainability are concentrated on two
issues:
The high dependence on energy import and the
increasing need for diversification of the energy
sources
4/3
/20
13
5
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
FUEL CHOICE
The current debate is all about the geopolitics of
supply of the natural gas, as leading energy
source and the pillar of the energy stability in the
continent.
The energy crisis in most of the south Asian
countries emanates from arranging the required
fuel and fuel diversification
Limited oil reserve /resource , emissions creating
cimate change related impacts creates challenges
coal and liquid fuel use.
Natural Gas is relatively environment friendly
4/3
/20
13
6
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
RESOURCE POTENTIAL
Bangladesh ,India , Pakistan and Afghanistan
has some proven reserve and significant
potential untapped natural gas
Next Door neighbors countries Myanmar and
Central Asian Countries [ Turkmenistan , Iran ]
have huge surplus which can feed the South
Asian Countries for several years
Talks and plans for IPI, TAPI , Myanmar-
Bangladesh –India Pipelines are going on for
almost one and a half decade
4/3
/20
13
7
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
TOP TEN NATURAL GAS PRODUCTING
COUNTRIES
Countries % of Total Resrve
Russia 18.0
Iran 11.1
Turkmenistan 8.73
Qatar 8.50
USA 3.00
KSA 2.73
Azerbaijan 2.02
Venezuela 1.84
Nigeria 1.75
Algeria 1.37
4/3
/20
13
8
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
GAS RESERVE OF SOUTH ASIAN
COUNTRIES
Ranking Countries Reserve of
World %
1 India 0.57
2 Pakistan 0.44
3 Myanmar 0.15
4 Bangladesh 0.10%
5 Afghanistan 0.03
4/3
/20
13
9
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
Opportunities,
Prospects &
Challenges
4/3
/20
13
10
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
PROSPECTS OF GAS TRADING
Gas imports from Central Asia [TAPI],
Iran [IPI], and Myanmar [Myanmar to
India Pipeline Across Bangladesh]
Cross Border Gas Pipelines from Gas rich
neighbors can create long term energy
security for energy starved south Asian
Countries
Could replace Oil and Coal and reduce
emissions
4/3
/20
13
11
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
IPI PIPELINE… 4
/3/2
013
12
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…IPI PIPELINES…
Conceptualized in 1950s by a Pakistani civil engineer and conceived by Indian and Iranians in 1989, preliminary agreement was signed in
1995 between Iran and Pakistan
1999 between India and Iran
2775 KM [1724 Miles] 56” OD Trans-border Gas Transmission Pipeline .
Design Capacity : 4 BCM
Discharge : 1 Tcf per annum
National Iranian Oil Company, Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Companies, Sui Southern Gas Company, GAZPROM
4/3
/20
13
13
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…IPI CHALLENGES…
USA asked Pakistan to abandon the
pipeline project : January 2010
Iran and Pakistan signed an agreement
on the pipeline : March 2010
Each country agreed to complete its
section by 2014.
In July 2011, Iran completed construction
of its section
4/3
/20
13
14
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…IPI CHALLENGES…
Pakistan proposed that the government
might have to impose a tax on consumers,
or seek government-to-government
arrangements with Iran, China and
Russia to build the pipeline
On 15 April 2012 Saudi Arabia offered to
deliver an "alternative package" to
Pakistan if the country abandoned its
cooperation with Iran.
In addition to oil the package would also
include a cash loan and oil facility
4/3
/20
13
15
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…IPI CHALLENGES…
On 1 May 2012, Pakistan's Foreign
Minister, Hina Rabbani Khar said,
Pakistan will complete the huge pipeline
project "at any cost" and that the project
was in line with the country's national
interest.
On 4 September 2012, the project was
announced to commence before October
2012 and be completed by December 2014
4/3
/20
13
16
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…IPI MILESTONES…
Conceived: Pakistani civil engineer
Malik Aftab Ahmed Khan in mid 1950s
Conceptualized: Rajendra K. Pachauri
in partnership with Ali Shams Ardekani,
former Deputy Foreign Minister of Iran in
1989
Preliminary agreement signed between
Pakistan & Iran : 1995.
Preliminary agreement between Iran and
India was signed: 1999
4/3
/20
13
17
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…IPI MILESTONES…
In 2004 the project revived after the
UNDP report Peace and Prosperity
Gas Pipelines by Gulfaraz Ahmed
was published in December 2003
In February 2007, India and
Pakistan agreed to pay Iran US$4.93
per million British thermal units
(US$4.67/GJ)
4/3
/20
13
18
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
IPI MILESTONES…
In April 2008, Iran expressed interest in
the People's Republic of China’s
participation in the project.
In August 2010, Iran invited Bangladesh
to join the project
In 2009, India withdrew from the project
over pricing and security issues, and after
signing a civilian nuclear deal with the
United States in 2008
4/3
/20
13
19
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
TAPI PIPELINES… 4
/3/2
013
20
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
Osman Yulatin
South Gas Field
Fazilka
Turkmenistan Afghanistan Pakistan & India Gas Pipeline
Project (TAPI)
21
TAPI NATURAL GAS PIPELINE
• 1,735 km [1078 miles] pipeline linking Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India (TAPI)
• An energy bridge to link gas resources of Turkmenistan with the energy starved sub-continent
• Open access TAPI Pipeline will transport 33 billion cubic metres per of natural gas per year
• Expected to boost the economies of all the four countries
22
…TAPI PIPELINES…
A Gas Pipeline Framework Agreement,
signed by representatives of the four
participating nations on April 25, 2008 in
Islamabad, envisaged construction to start in
2010, supplying gas by 2015.
1,000-mile route from Central to South Asia -
Turkmenistan (Dauletabad) – Afghanistan
(Heart, Helmand – Kandahar) – Pakistan
(Quetta and Multan) – India (Fazilka).
ADB on the basis of its study reported that the
estimated capital cost was $7.6 billion and it
would consider financing the project
4/3
/20
13
23
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…TAPI PIPELINES
Four country framework agreement installed.
India and Pakistan signed GPSA with
Turkmenistan
Transit tariff agreement among transit countries
were under negotiation
But in efforts to attract investors for build, own
and operate the about 8 Billion dollar pipeline
the project sponsor ADB got very poor response.
4/3
/20
13
24
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…TAPI PIPELINES…
A Gas Pipeline Framework Agreement,
signed by representatives of the four
participating nations on April 25, 2008 in
Islamabad, envisaged construction to start in
2010, supplying gas by 2015.
The announced 1,000-mile route would
follow the ancient trading route from Central
to South Asia, extending from the
Dauletabad gas field in Turkmenistan along
the highway through Herat, Helmand and
Kandahar in Afghanistan, to Quetta and
Multan in Pakistan, and on to Fazilka in
India.
4/3
/20
13
25
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…TAPI PIPELINES…
Participating countries have held many
high-level meetings during the past eight
years, with Asian Development Bank
(ADB) sponsorship and multilateral
support
The ADB completed a feasibility study in
2005 that was updated in 2008
The ADB reported that the estimated
capital cost was $7.6 billion, and said it
would consider financing for the project.
4/3
/20
13
26
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…TAPI MILESTONE…
Turkmenistan promised independent
certification of the gas available for the
pipeline
Plan for the line to be built and operated
by a consortium of national oil companies
from the four countries
Special-purpose financial vehicle would be
floated, and international companies
would likely to join in laying and
operating the pipelines.
4/3
/20
13
27
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
…TAPI MILESTONE
Four country framework agreement installed.
India and Pakistan signed GPSA with
Turkmenistan
Transit tariff agreement among transit countries
were under negotiation
But in efforts to attract investors for build, own
and operate the about 8 Billion dollar pipeline
the project sponsor ADB got very poor response.
4/3
/20
13
28
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
MYANMAR –BANGLADESH –INDIA
PIPELINE
Bangladeshi Private Sector Initiative Mohona
Holdings Ltd conceived the Myanmar –India
pipeline across Bangladesh Tri Nation Gas
Pipeline in early 1900s
The initiative advanced almost to take off stage
in early 2005 when Energy Ministers of three
countries after a summit meeting at Yangoon
agreed on principle to go ahead with it .
This pipeline if built would have a capacity of
transporting 1 BCF of gas from Gas Fields in
Myanmar across Bangladesh to Indian Eastern
states by 2009
4/3
/20
13
29
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
TRI NATION PIPELINE
The representatives of three countries comprising
Technical and Financial experts met at Yangoon
for a two day extensive brain storming in
February 2005
A draft MOU was initialed agreeing on the route
and nature of the pipeline
MOU also included proposal for further techno
economic feasibility study for the open access
pipeline permitting injecting and siphoning off
gas along pipeline route.
4/3
/20
13
30
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
TRI NATION PIPELINE
MOU included the following unresolved bilateral issues between Bangladesh and India: Possibility of Bangladesh accessing to
Hydropower of Nepal and Bhutan across India
India guaranteeing unhindered trading corridor among Bangladesh , India and Nepal across the Chicken neck
India removing tariff and non tariff barriers to Bangladesh export commodity to Indian market
It was agreed to advance resolution of the these bilateral issues side by side to Tri Nation Pipeline discussion
4/3
/20
13
31
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
TRI NATION PIPELINE
India was hesitant in buying gas at 4 US$ /
MMBTU
Protracted discussions between Bangladesh and
India without any concrete result.
China offered better deal to Myanmar and
finalized agreement for import of gas at
attractive price
It is an example of lost opportunity for S, Asia
resulting in:
India buying LNG at US$14 /MMBTU from Qatar
and Other sources
B’desh gas crisis prolonged, as it has opportunity
loss of about 500 MMCFD
4/3
/20
13
32
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
ROADBLOCKS IN TRANSBORDER
ENERGY TRADE Geopolitics
Bilateral political irritants – Border disputes,
Water sharing issues, etc.
Lack of political will and commitment
Insurgency and security concerns
Absence of effective independent regulatory
institutions for creating level play ground for
private and public sector companies.
Lack of effective public –private partnership.
Corruption and political interference
4/3
/20
13
33
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
Suggestions &
Recommendations
4/3
/20
13
34
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
CHALLENGES OF CROSS BORDER
PIPELINES
Geopolitics
Security Concerns
Absence of Functional Independent Regulatory
Infrastructure
Poor Governance and Weak State Owned
Enterprises
Poor Pricing of gas and energy
Lack of faith among nations for several irritants
Resources constraints for investing in Multi
Billion Dollar Project
Weak PPP mechanism
4/3
/20
13
35
En
gr. S
ale
qu
e
THANK YOU