cfp and impact fees - slcdocs.com · 2 o impact fee table – attachment 3 slc examples –...

1

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: March 27, 2012

SUBJECT: 10 YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Briefing – February 21, 2012 – Finalize Impact Fee Eligible

Projects

Briefing – January 31, 2012 – Review of Detailed List

Briefing – January 10, 2012 – Review of Detailed List

Briefing – October 25, 2011 – Debt Policies and Policy

Question Discussion

Briefing – October 4, 2011 – Capital Management Policies

Discussion

Retreat – September 9, 2011 – Council Priorities Discussion

Briefing – September 6, 2011

Initial Briefing – May 31, 2011

COUNCIL PHILOSOPHY STATEMENTS: ▪ Economic Health of the City

▪ Arts and Culture

▪ Neighborhood Quality of Life

▪ Transportation and Mobility

▪ Parks and Open Space

▪ Sustainability

STAFF REPORT BY: KAREN HALLADAY, BUDGET AND POLICY ANALYST

AFFECTED COUNCIL DISTRICTS: ALL

The purpose of this discussion is to review and finalize decisions regarding the: 1) 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and 2) impact fees that have been revised, re-calculated, and submitted by the City’s project consultant, Galena Consulting. Plan revisions were made based on the Council’s direction. Since the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan is the basis for the calculation of the proposed impact fees, project additions and modifications prior to the adoption of the CFP will affect the impact fee calculation. It should be noted that once the CFP is formally adopted, changes to the City’s impact fee schedule will occur. The Council was interested in including several projects that were not included in the original CFP (Option A) presented to the Council in May of 2011. In order to understand the impact of including these projects in the impact fee calculation, the consultant prepared two additional options (Options B and C) for the Council’s consideration. These options, including the resulting proposed impact fees, can be compared to the original plan (Option A). Additionally, the consultant provided a survey of impact fees charged. The proposed impact fees can be compared against several averages and cities, including the national average, an average of ten (10) Western Cities, and individual Utah cities. In addition to the Galena Consulting documents mentioned above, the staff report includes the following information:

Next Steps – A proposed timeline for the steps necessary to finalize this item.

Options, Summary and Notes of CFP Revisions - Changes and notes regarding the revised 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan (Fiscally Constrained).

Graphs and Table - Comparison of SLC Proposed Impact Fees to Surveyed Cities o Housing – Attachment 1

o Commercial – Attachment 2

2

o Impact Fee Table – Attachment 3

SLC Examples – Comparison of a sample of Salt Lake City projects showing the amount of impact fees that would be charged using current and proposed impact fee options. – Attachment 4

Next Steps The following is a schedule of next steps, including a proposed timeline for completion of this item.

March 27 – Briefing - Consider Options (A, B, and C) and Finalize 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan, which determines how impact fees will be structured.

March – April – Notification of impact fee changes sent.

April 3 – Consent - Set date for public hearing.

April 24 – Public Hearing.

May 1 – Adopt 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan and Impact Fee Facilities Plan.

Options, Summary and Notes of CFP Revisions Based on the Council’s discussion and determination of projects to include in the CFP, the consultant prepared two additional options for the Council to consider. The impact fees proposed vary from option to option. Details of the options, including the original proposal, are presented in the following table.

Salt Lake City – Proposed Impact Fee Options

Option A Original Proposal

Option B Full Parks

Option C Reduced Parks

Goal Keep park fees under $1,500.

Collect all of the parks impact fees that are eligible.

Develop 45 acres of parks, with a focus on linear parks and open space.

New Park Development 20 Acres – Traditionally developed parks

45 Acres, which could include: ▪ Sugar House streetcar-related linear park ▪ portion of Jordan and Salt Lake Canal ▪ City Creek Trail Shared-Use Pathways

45 Acres of Parks, with a focus more on linear parks and open space than on traditional new parks, including: ▪ portion of Jordan and Salt Lake Canal ▪ City Creek Trail Shared-Use Pathways

Open Space Acquisition 70 Acres 50 Acres Information Needed

Amount for Growth-Related Park Development

$7.2 Million $16.7 Million $10.5 Million

Parks Impact Fee – Residential (Per Dwelling Unit)

$1,752 $4,180 $2,565

Total Proposed Impact Fees:

Single Family/Dwelling Unit $2,777 $4,764 $3,148 Multi-Family/Dwelling Unit $2,591 $4,590 $2,974

Retail/sf $3.54 $3.63 $3.63 Office/sf $2.70 $2.68 $2.68 Industrial/sf $2.64 $2.61 $2.61

In addition to the options presented above, the consultant noted the following changes to the impact fee program: (Note: Fee comparison graphs, an impact fee table, and a chart showing examples of project impact fees calculated under the three options are provided as attachments to this report.)

3

Streets/Transportation Impact Fees o Currently, only non-residential development in the Westside Industrial service area is being

assessed streets/transportation impact fees. Given the capacity-increasing capital improvements, including citywide bike lane projects, the Administration proposes assessing a proportional share of these improvements to residential development.

o Major road improvements will now be spread among all citywide commercial development resulting in a new streets/transportation fee for residential and commercial infill development. According to paperwork provided by the consultant, this will reduce fees for retail and office development in the western area of the City (industrial fees will remain the same) and increase fees for infill development. This is a policy shift that makes it relatively cheaper to build retail and office space in this area. ►The Council may wish to discuss this and consider how this may affect economic development decisions.

Police and Fire Impact Fees – Fund balances from fees previously collected for growth-related capital improvement projects has reduced the amount proposed for police and fire impact fees.

Park Fees o The prior CFP had few growth-related parks and open space projects, so the current parks

impact fee is $681 per dwelling unit, which is lower than what has been proposed with Options A, B & C.

o Several projects related to meeting the service needs of new growth have been developed, including the linear park associated with the Sugar House streetcar line.

o If and when possible, the City would like to take advantage of lower land costs and start “banking” land for future parks to serve new growth.

o The nature of park development, traditional vs. open space, affects project costs and therefore impact fees.

Regarding the revised CFP, the consultant noted the following:

Implementation of the CFP o The 10-Year CFP is a guide for future capital planning and spending. The plan can be modified

based on City priorities and needs. This would continue to occur during the annual Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) funding allocation process.

o The 10-Year CFP proposes “front loading” tennis court improvements in the first four years of the plan.

Financing o Some larger projects, such as, Fire Stations #3 (Sugar House) and #14 (Industrial Road) and the

Police Crime Lab will be funded in phases and money will be set aside years in advance of construction. According to the consultant, this is because of the spike in debt service in the later part of the 10-year period.

o The 10-Year CFP funding strategy to complete capital projects would change if the City decided to bond for projects included in the CFP or if decisions were made to expedite and/or delay projects included in the plan.

Policy Questions for Consideration:

1. The Council developed an unconstrained inventory of City-wide projects needed over the next ten years. Does the Council wish to provide the inventory and 10-Year CFP to the Community Development Capital Improvement Projects (CDCIP) Board for their use in developing and recommending annual Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)?

4

2. It should be noted that since this project commenced the Planning Division has initiated a project to inventory capital projects raised in adopted City Master Plans. Does the Council wish to request that this information also be provided to the CDCIP Board?

3. The consultant prepared the following questions the Council may wish to consider as impact fees are

discussed and reviewed: “When evaluating comparisons to proposed impact fees, the following

questions may be most useful as part of a comprehensive policy discussion:

a. Has the impact fee been calculated in compliance with State statute?

b. Has the impact fee been calculated based on reasonable growth projections?

c. Has the impact fee been calculated based on reasonable capital costs for providing the capital

necessary to continue the current level of service as the population grows?

d. Are the calculated impact fees significantly higher or lower than jurisdictions considered comparable

to Salt Lake City? If so, can these differences be explained?

e. What kind of development is the City hoping to attract?

f. Will the level of these impact fees be a significant factor in a developer’s decision to locate in a location other than Salt Lake City? Note: The consultant’s report noted that “Business-location decisions are based on many factors other than government cost (e.g., demographics of customer base, access to skilled labor, quality of life for residents, transportation access/egress, suitability of retail/office/industrial space, prestige/status of mailing address, etc). If government cost is a factor, it also encompasses ongoing tax rates and the value perception of ongoing services received for taxes and fees.

g. If the City is considering adopting a fee lower than what will fully recover the cost of necessary capital

infrastructure, can the City afford to fund the difference? Alternatively, will it be acceptable to allow

the level of service to decrease?”

Below are outstanding items the Council may wish to revisit. This information was prepared for the CFP and Impact Fee briefing on February 14th. The discussion was rescheduled to the 21st of February.

Updated: Funding Options – Attached is a chart with samples for City projects that could be financed with a sales tax bond, general obligation bond, and/or a property tax increase. The projects and amounts in the various scenarios are based on information and estimates provided in the Capital Facilities Plan. Council Staff will be prepared at the meeting to calculate other scenarios. (Note: Contact Council Staff in advance if you want specific scenarios prepared.)

Updated: Policy Questions - Questions that had been discussed previously by the Council have been removed. The Council may wish to revisit the below questions.

1. Note: Council Staff has requested the Administration to respond to this question: Can the Stormwater

Fund and/or the Mosquito Abatement program be expanded as appropriate to address the curb and gutter repair and replacement needs as part of the City’s overall drainage system? Fee levels, impacts to the existing stormwater projects, replacement criteria, and project planning would all have to be studied and discussed with affected departments and the public.

5

2. Does the Council wish to direct staff resources toward completing the previously discussed sidewalk /

concrete replacement study, given recent legal rulings that could place greater emphasis on this area? Note: This item has been on hold given other priorities.

Updated: Possible Legislative Intents - The items below have been discussed by the Council during the CFP briefings. They could be adopted as Legislative Intents.

1. Given the economic challenges over the past several years, it is the intent of the Council to review, discuss,

and possibly amend the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) with the Administration within the next three years. It is the intent of the Council to increase the CIP allocation from the current allocation of seven percent (7%). The Council indicated their desire to increase the allocation in the third year of the CFP plan to eight percent (8%) and to nine percent (9%) in the fifth year of the CPF. (If the Council supports this legislative intent statement it can be incorporated in to the policy so that the policy is consistent with the practice and there is no confusion between the policy, practice and intent.)

2. It is the intent of the Council to study existing, desired, and current best practices for appropriate levels of

service for all City services before the Council reviews the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan again in the next two to three years. This information could be used to support and communicate City needs if a General Obligation Bond is one of the solutions to help fund needs for new and/or existing City assets.

3. It is the intent of the Council to approve annual operating budgets which include funds to catch up on

deferred repair and maintenance needs of City assets, rather than have deferred maintenance and repair annual expenses become part of the CIP program. (NOTE: As defined in the Capital and Debt Management Policy – “Capital improvements involve the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures. A capital improvement must have a useful life of five or more years. A capital project must also have a cost of $50,000 or more unless its significant functionality can be demonstrated to warrant its inclusion as a capital project. A capital improvement is not a recurring capital outlay item (such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine (unless the fire apparatus is Impact Fee eligible) or a maintenance expense (such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches). Acquisition of equipment is not a capital project unless it is an integral part of the cost of a capital project.”)

4. It is the intent of the Council to allocate one-time funds for deferred/catch-up improvement and

maintenance needs of the City that do not fit the definition of capital improvements. Items include repairs to existing facilities and equipment. (NOTE: If desired, the Council could specify an amount per year, such as „at least $250,000 per year‟ in order to give the Administration an idea of what the Council would like to see.)

5. It is the intent of the Council to continue to use all tools available, including Special Assessment Areas and

the 50/50 program, to repair, maintain, and replace City concrete infrastructure, including streets, sidewalks, and curb and gutter. The Administration should continue to improve its processes to ensure strong public involvement and competitive pricing.

6. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration include in its transmittals information on annual

operating and maintenance costs any time new assets are proposed to be added to the City’s capital asset inventory.

7. It is the intent of the Council to work with the Administration in identifying streets needing pedestrian

safety devices, including adding Hawk signals throughout the City.

6

8. It is the intent of the Council to place a high priority on projects that relate to the Council’s indentified priorities. The Council’s priorities are:

Arts and Culture

Economic Health of the City

Local/Neighborhood Business

Neighborhood Schools

Parks and Open Space

Sustainability

Transportation and Mobility

Updated: The Council may wish to consider this item at a later date. 1. In FY2015-16 SARR debt service of $5.3 million for the Steiner Ice Sheet transfers from the RDA to the

City’s General Fund tightening funds available for annual Capital Improvement Projects. Does the Council wish to discuss the possibility of not transferring the SARRs debt to the CIP Fund?

Note regarding Attachments 1 and 2

The consultant noted several cautionary statements in the Impact Fee Comparisons report regarding the use of the survey information. Staff has

included these statements for the reader’s use when comparing Salt Lake City’s proposed total impact fees to other cities and averages.

There are challenges inherent in making definitive conclusions about the appropriate level of an impact fee based on these comparisons,

however:

The list of cities included in the comparison is not exhaustive, nor is it statistically sampled. While attempts were made to include a

variety of different comparisons, some cities may have been included that may not be considered by the City to be comparable, and

some may have been omitted that are.

Some cities have complex impact fee schedules, assigning specific fee levels for each land use type, and/or different service areas. In

order to include fee data from these cities, estimations were made in order to aggregate the data.

Impact fee statutes change from state to state. Some states may allow impact fees to fund capital items that others do not, which may

affect the level of the impact fee. Many jurisdictions used in this comparison have impact fees in categories other than roads, parks,

police and fire (i.e., government buildings, schools, arts and culture facilities, etc.). The total impact fee on a unit of development in

these cases would be higher than is shown in this comparison.

Impact fees are based on continuing the current level of service. Every city has a different level of service (i.e., faster or slower fire

response, more or less police officers, more or less park acres, better or worse roadway congestion), which affects the level of the

impact fee.

Some jurisdictions address the cost of growth in ways other than impact fees. For example, instead of assessing impact fees, a city

may choose to exact the improvement as a condition of development approval, or to subsidize the cost of growth from other revenue

sources such as General Funds.

Growth patterns are different. For example, some cities are experiencing more infill growth, which can be less capital-intensive, while

other cities are experiencing growth in annexed and/or previously undeveloped areas that will require a great deal of capital

investment. The degree of capital required to meet the demands of growth will differ, and will affect the level of the impact fee.

Attachment 1

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

Do

llars

SLC Proposed Total Impact Fee Options and Surveyed Cities and Averages, Listed Alphabetically

Salt Lake City Corporation Comparison of SLC Proposed Impact Fees (Residential) to Surveyed Cities

Data Provided By: Galena Consulting - March 15, 2012

Single

Multi-Family

Attachment 2

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

$8.00

$9.00

$10.00

Do

llars

SLC Proposed Total Impact Fee Options and Surveyed Cities and Averages, Listed Alphabetically

Salt Lake City Corporation Comparison of SLC Proposed Total Impact Fees (Commercial) to Surveyed Cities

Data Provided By: Galena Consulting - March 15, 2012

Retail/sf

Office/sf

Industrial/sf

Attachment 3

Single Family Multi-Family Retail/sf Office/sf Industrial/sf

Salt Lake City - Current -$ -$ 8.62$ 4.20$ 2.00$

Salt Lake City - Original Proposal 450$ 264$ 2.91$ 2.07$ 2.01$

Salt Lake City - Full Parks Option 424$ 249$ 3.28$ 2.33$ 2.26$

Salt Lake City - Reduced Parks Option 424$ 249$ 3.28$ 2.33$ 2.26$

National Average 3,227$ 2,179$ 5.95$ 3.36$ 2.06$

Western States - Highest Surveyed 6,499$ 4,322$ 11.51$ 9.28$ 3.96$

Western States - Lowest Surveyed 1,140$ 1,073$ 2.03$ 1.04$ 0.63$

Utah Cities - Highest Surveyed 2,399$ 4,340$ 4.85$ 2.94$ 2.55$

Utah Cities - Lowest Surveyed 315$ 290$ 0.30$ 0.14$ 0.05$


Salt Lake City - Current 681$ 681$ n/a n/a n/a

Salt Lake City - Original Proposal 1,752$ 1,752$ n/a n/a n/a

Salt Lake City - Full Parks Option 4,180$ 4,180$ n/a n/a n/a

Salt Lake City - Reduced Parks Option 2,565$ 2,565$ n/a n/a n/a

National Average 2,955$ 2,254$ n/a n/a n/a

Western States - Highest Surveyed 8,622$ 6,681$ n/a n/a n/a

Western States - Lowest Surveyed 738$ 738$ n/a n/a n/a

Utah Cities - Highest Surveyed 4,346$ 3,445$ n/a n/a n/a

Utah Cities - Lowest Surveyed 1,633$ 469$ n/a n/a n/a


Salt Lake City - Current 452$ 452$ 0.30$ 0.30$ 0.30$




National Average 385$ 303$ 4.30$ 0.26$ 0.18$

Western States - Highest Surveyed 802$ 635$ 0.68$ 0.52$ 0.40$

Western States - Lowest Surveyed 161$ 123$ 0.12$ 0.06$ 0.06$

Utah Cities - Highest Surveyed 605$ 495$ 0.56$ 0.56$ 0.45$



Salt Lake City - Current 485$ 485$ 0.32$ 0.32$ 0.32$




National Average 512$ 381$ 4.19$ 0.38$ 0.26$


Western States - Lowest Surveyed 159$ 119$ 0.16$ 0.14$ 0.05$

Utah Cities - Highest Surveyed 576$ 576$ 0.65$ 0.54$ 0.25$



Salt Lake City - Current 1,618$ 1,618$ 8.62$ 4.20$ 2.00$

Salt Lake City - Original Proposal 2,777$ 2,591$ 3.54$ 2.70$ 2.64$

Salt Lake City - Full Parks Option 4,764$ 4,590$ 3.63$ 2.68$ 2.61$

Salt Lake City - Reduced Parks Option 3,148$ 2,974$ 3.63$ 2.68$ 2.61$

National Average 7,079$ 5,617$ 6.29$ 4.04$ 2.69$


Western States - Lowest Surveyed 4,061$ 2,772$ 2.05$ 1.22$ 0.73$

Utah Cities - Highest Surveyed 6,549$ 5,627$ 4.74$ 2.94$ 2.62$


Roads Impact Fees

Parks Impact Fees

Police Impact Fees

Fire Impact Fees

Total Impact Fees

Attachment 4

Current Option A Option B Option C

Original Proposal Full Parks Option Reduced Parks Option

Project Examples

Residential:

Single Family 1,618$ 2,777$ 4,764$ 3,149$

Multi-Family 1,618$ 2,591$ 4,590$ 2,974$

10 units 16,180$ 25,910$ 45,900$ 29,740$

100 units 161,800$ 259,100$ 459,000$ 297,400$

1,000 units 1,618,000$ 2,591,000$ 4,590,000$ 2,974,000$

Commercial:

10,000 sf project

Infill Development (Note 1) 6,200$

Retail 6,200$ 35,400$ 36,300$ 36,300$

Office 6,200$ 27,000$ 26,800$ 26,800$

Industrial 6,200$ 26,400$ 26,100$ 26,100$

West Side Development (Note 2)

Retail 86,200$ 35,400$ 36,300$ 36,300$

Office 42,000$ 27,000$ 26,800$ 26,800$

Industrial 20,000$ 26,400$ 26,100$ 26,100$

Note 1: NWQ impact fees are similar to infill development.

Note 2: The proposed impact fees are the same for Westside and Infill development.

Comparison of Impact Fee Proposals for Salt Lake City

To: LuAnn Clark, Salt Lake City HAND

From: Anne Wescott, Galena Consulting

Date: March 19, 2012

Re: Revised 10-Year Fiscally Constrained Capital Facilities Plan

As part of the process to update the City’s current impact fee program, the City must update

its 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan (CFP).1

The addition or revision of capital project priorities required changes to the funding years

or amount projected for other projects. The following should be noted about this final

version of the CFP:

A fiscally-constrained CFP was presented to

Council in May 2011 for consideration. The Council held several work sessions evaluating

the CFP and setting priorities for funding. The 10-Year CFP has been updated to reflect the

Council’s direction and is presented now for final review (see Exhibits attached). Once the

Council has reviewed this final CFP, a hearing to adopt the CFP and consider amending the

impact fees can be set.

• Because of the spike in debt service in the later part of the 10 year period, some larger projects had to be funded in phases. In essence, the City would be setting aside money over several years in advance of construction. If the City decides to bond for some of these improvements (i.e., Fire Stations #3 and #14, the Police Crime Lab and Evidence Facility, the Jordan/McClelland and City Creek Trail Shared Use Pathways, Bike Lane/Pedestrian Improvements, etc.) this strategy can be abandoned. Alternatively, the City could fund an entire project in one year by not funding other scheduled improvements.

• In order to balance revenues and expenditures planned for FY19-20, Fire Station

#14 could not be fully funded for construction until FY20-21, a year later than

1 Formerly referred to as a Capital Improvement Plan or CIP

previously planned. The City can make changes to this funding strategy at its discretion.

• In most cases, placeholders for ongoing improvements like restrooms and

sidewalks are just spread evenly over the 10 year period. In order to balance annual revenues and expenditures, however, some adjustments had to be made, resulting in some assumptions about certain projects being funded in a particular year. For example, tennis court improvements are “front loaded” in the first four years of the 10-Year CFP as increased debt service reduces available funding in future years.

• It is important for the Council to note that they do not need to stick to these

priorities in the future. Although the expenditures for each year are based on Council priorities, on an annual basis the Council can fund any capital projects it chooses. These projects can be taken from the list of priorities (i.e., parks identified by the Administration as needing repairs or replacements within the next ten years); or other priorities identified by Council Members during recent briefings. Council members can also identify new priorities in future years and the CFP can be adjusted. The CFP is a guide for future capital funding, and can be adjusted at any time.

This CFP is the basis for the City’s impact fee program. If adopted, it will trigger an update in the City’s impact fee schedule. Several changes to the impact fee program are being recommended in this update:

1. Currently, only non-residential development is being assessed streets/ transportation impact fees, and only in the Westside Industrial service area. Because of capacity-increasing capital improvements including citywide bike lane projects, the Administration has proposed assessing a proportional share of these improvements to residential development as well. In addition, major road improvements will now be spread among all commercial development citywide. This change will significantly reduce fees for retail and office development in the western area of the City (industrial will stay the same), and introduce a relatively low but new streets/transportation fee to residential development, as well as to commercial development in infill areas of the City.

2. Another impact to the fee structure is a result of existing fund balances. Because

previous development has already paid into the impact fee fund for future improvements, this fund balance is subtracted from the total amount of growth-related capital improvements. This has contributed to a significant decrease in fire and police impact fees (over 90%), and a further reduction to streets/ transportation fees.

3. These reductions are offset by increases in parks impact fees. In the last CFP, the

City had few parks or open space projects planned to address the needs of new growth, so the parks impact fee was relatively low in comparison to other

jurisdictions. The City has now developed several projects that will meet the service needs of new growth, including the linear park project associated with the Sugar House streetcar line. The City would also like to take advantage of lower land costs and start “banking” land for future parks to serve new growth. These projects are impact fee eligible. Depending on the amount and type of park development desired by the City in the next ten years, parks impact fees would need to increase significantly over current levels.

Three options have been prepared for Council consideration related to impact fee-funded parks projects: • The first option (presented in the draft impact fee report of May 2011, but not

included in these revised CFPs) was designed to keep parks fees under $1,500, and assumed approximately 20 acres of new parks would be traditionally developed, with another 70 acres being acquired as open space. The 10-Year budget for growth-related park development under this scenario was approximately $7.2 million.

• The second option assumes that the City would collect all of the parks impact

fees they were eligible to collect (approximately $16.7 million in growth-related improvements over ten years). This is based on the full development of almost 45 acres of traditionally-designed new parks (which could include the development of the Sugar House streetcar-related linear park); a portion of the Jordan and Salt Lake Canal, and City Creek Trail Shared-Use Pathways; and over 50 acres of open space acquisition. This would cause the parks fee to increase from $681 to $4,180, a fee that is significantly higher than the national and regional averages of approximately $2,700.

• The third option assumes that the City develops 45 acres of parks, but focuses

more on linear parks and open space (which could include the development of the Sugar House streetcar-related linear park) than traditional new parks. The City would also be able to use impact fees for a portion of the Jordan and Salt Lake Canal and City Creek Trail Shared-Use Pathways. Because of the lower cost of this type of park development (a total of approximately $10.5 versus $16 million) the resulting fee would increase from the current $681 to $2,565. This would be more in line with national and regional averages.

The Council can choose to adopt any level of parks impact fee, up to the full cost fee identified above. NEXT STEPS Once the Council has preliminarily approved the revised CFP, and determined how impact fees should be structured, these documents can be finalized for public review. The Council can then set hearings for the adoption of the CFP and amendment of the impact fee ordinance.

4

REVISED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN EXHIBITS

All Exhibits reflect full parks impact fees

5

Salt Lake City - Sources and UsesCapital Improvement Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained Assuming Full Cost Parks Impact Fees

SOURCES FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year totals

On-Going General Fund Contribution - 7% 13,543,847$ 13,723,562$ 14,135,269$ 14,559,327$ 14,996,107$ 15,445,990$ 15,909,370$ 16,386,651$ 16,878,250$ 17,384,598$ 152,962,971$ Ongoing General Fund Revenues 13,543,847$ 13,723,562$ 14,135,269$ 14,559,327$ 14,996,107$ 15,445,990$ 15,909,370$ 16,386,651$ 16,878,250$ 17,384,598$ 152,962,971$

Impact Fees (including current fund balances) 3,420,000$ 8,060,589$ 4,477,389$ 4,207,389$ 2,271,989$ 2,939,289$ 3,059,289$ 5,824,889$ 3,191,889$ 2,913,889$ 40,366,600$ Open Space Bond Fund Balance -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 600,000$ 2,100,000$ Class C CIP Funds 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 24,000,000$ CDBG CIP Funds 1,304,175$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 11,204,175$ Facilities - Fleet Bond Revenue -$ 1,264,291$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,264,291$ Grants for Shared Use Pathways -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Streets Viaduct Match-already in CIP account -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ Federal Grant - FHWA -$ 9,320,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,320,000$ Sale of Public Safety/Evidence Property 6,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 11,000,000$

Total General Fund Revenues 20,668,022$ 36,818,442$ 28,862,658$ 27,866,716$ 20,768,096$ 21,885,279$ 22,468,659$ 25,961,540$ 23,570,139$ 23,798,487$ 252,668,037$

USES FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year totalsDebt Service

Sales Tax Bonds 3,757,013$ 4,161,854$ 4,401,174$ 2,930,705$ 6,864,511$ 9,354,071$ 9,342,669$ 9,333,578$ 9,332,520$ 9,337,671$ 68,815,766$ CAM Bond Issuance - estimated/placeholder Parking Pay Stations 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ -$ -$ 4,660,460$ Streetcar 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 2,250,000$ Pay Station Test 291,777$ 291,777$ UPAC BAN 262,000$ 262,000$ 524,000$ Remainder of CAM Bond Issuance Placeholder 2,408,223$ 1,322,220$ 1,322,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 2,250,000$ 2,250,000$ 17,473,763$

Ongoing Debt Service 6,457,013$ 6,661,854$ 6,901,174$ 5,430,705$ 9,364,511$ 11,854,071$ 11,842,669$ 11,833,578$ 11,832,520$ 11,837,671$ 94,015,766$

Capital ProjectsFire -$ 550,000$ $1,000,000 6,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$ 2,000,000$ 1,550,000$ 13,600,000$ Police -$ 5,000,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$ Parks and Open Space 2,159,174$ 5,759,849$ 7,086,389$ 7,679,589$ 4,829,589$ 4,904,589$ 5,229,589$ 4,529,589$ 5,629,589$ 3,879,589$ 51,687,534$ Streets 8,981,709$ 14,888,300$ 5,753,850$ 4,980,229$ 4,797,029$ 3,741,479$ 4,468,379$ 5,912,729$ 3,109,729$ 4,706,570$ 61,340,000$ Transportation 1,190,000$ 2,785,000$ 2,965,000$ 2,615,000$ 345,000$ 510,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 12,010,000$ Facilities - ongoing 490,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 4,000,000$ Facilities - discretionary 1,227,539$ 623,439$ 606,245$ 611,193$ 837,367$ 325,140$ 58,022$ 155,644$ 128,302$ 794,657$ 5,367,548$ CIP/Impact Fee Update -$ -$ -$ -$ 44,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 44,600$ Percent for Art 130,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,030,000$ Overruns 32,587$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 572,587$

Ongoing General Fund Expenditures 14,211,009$ 30,156,588$ 21,961,484$ 22,436,010$ 11,403,584$ 10,031,207$ 10,625,989$ 14,127,961$ 11,737,619$ 11,960,815$ 158,652,269$

Total General Fund Capital Expenditures 20,668,022$ 36,818,442$ 28,862,658$ 27,866,715$ 20,768,095$ 21,885,278$ 22,468,658$ 25,961,539$ 23,570,139$ 23,798,486$ 252,668,035$

difference (0)$ 0$ (0)$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ (0)$ 0$ 1$

Salt Lake City - All DepartmentsCapital Facilities Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained Assuming Full Parks Impact Fees

CIP ApprovedValue FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year total

Fire 13,600,000$ -$ 550,000$ 1,000,000$ 6,000,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,000,000$ 1,550,000$ 13,600,000$

Police 9,000,000$ -$ 5,000,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$

Parks and Open Space 51,687,534$ 2,159,174$ 5,759,849$ 7,086,389$ 7,679,589$ 4,829,589$ 4,904,589$ 5,229,589$ 4,529,589$ 5,629,589$ 3,879,589$ 51,687,534$

Streets 61,340,000$ 8,981,709$ 14,888,300$ 5,753,850$ 4,980,229$ 4,797,029$ 3,741,479$ 4,468,379$ 5,912,729$ 3,109,729$ 4,706,570$ 61,340,000$

Transportation 12,010,000$ 1,190,000$ 2,785,000$ 2,965,000$ 2,615,000$ 345,000$ 510,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 12,010,000$

Facilities 9,367,549$ 1,717,539$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,227,367$ 715,140$ 448,022$ 545,644$ 518,302$ 1,195,535$ 9,367,549$

CIP/Impact Fee Update 44,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 44,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 44,600$

Percent for Art 1,000,000$ 130,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,030,000$

Overruns 600,000$ 32,587$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 572,587$

Sub-Total 158,649,683$ 14,211,009$ 30,143,149$ 21,965,239$ 22,434,817$ 11,403,584$ 10,031,207$ 10,625,989$ 14,127,961$ 11,737,619$ 11,971,693$ 158,652,270$

Major Capital Items TBD -$

158,649,683$ 14,211,009$ 30,143,149$ 21,965,239$ 22,434,817$ 11,403,584$ 10,031,207$ 10,625,989$ 14,127,961$ 11,737,619$ 11,971,693$ 158,652,270$

Salt Lake City - All DepartmentsCapital Facilities Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained

CIP Impact Fee Other FundingValue Eligible Sources General Fund Class C CDBG Impact Fees FHWA Other Total

7%

Fire 13,600,000$ $ 5,133,000 8,467,000$ 3,467,000$ -$ -$ $ 5,133,000 -$ 5,000,000$ 13,600,000$

Police 9,000,000$ $ 2,250,000 6,750,000$ 750,000$ -$ -$ $ 2,250,000 -$ 6,000,000$ 9,000,000$

Parks and Open Space 51,687,534$ $ 17,072,000 $ 34,615,534 26,965,534$ -$ 5,300,000$ $ 17,072,000 -$ 2,350,000$ 51,687,534$

Streets 61,340,000$ $ 13,680,000 47,660,000$ 9,335,825$ 24,000,000$ 4,804,175$ 13,680,000$ 9,320,000$ 200,000$ 61,340,000$

Transportation 12,010,000$ $ 2,187,000 9,823,000$ 9,823,000$ -$ -$ $ 2,187,000 -$ 12,010,000$

Facilities 9,367,549$ $ - 9,367,549$ 8,103,258$ -$ -$ $ - -$ 1,264,291$ 9,367,549$

CIP/Impact Fee Update 44,600$ $ 44,600 -$ -$ -$ -$ $ 44,600 -$ -$ 44,600$

Percent for Art 1,000,000$ $ - 1,030,000$ 400,000$ -$ 630,000$ $ - -$ -$ 1,030,000$

Overruns 600,000$ $ - 572,587$ 102,587$ -$ 470,000$ $ - -$ -$ 572,587$

Sub-Total 158,649,683$ 40,366,600$ 118,285,670$ 58,947,204$ 24,000,000$ 11,204,175$ 40,366,600$ 9,320,000$ 14,814,291$ 158,652,270$

Major Capital Items TBD

158,649,683$ 40,366,600$ 118,285,670$ 58,947,204$ 24,000,000$ 11,204,175$ 40,366,600$ 9,320,000$ 14,814,291$ 158,652,270$

This summary does not include existing Debt Service: See Sources and Uses tab General Fund Class C CDBG Impact Fees FHWA Other Total

available after debt service 58,947,204$ 24,000,000$ 11,204,175$ $40,366,600 9,320,000$ 14,814,291$ 158,652,270$

difference 0$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0$

Funding Sources - Detail

Salt Lake City Fire DepartmentCapital Improvement Plan, 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained

Square Land Estimated Other

Type of Capital Facility Feet Acreage Cost Funding

to Growth Sources

Facilities

2013 Fire Station #3 - Relocation and Expansion; Land Acquisition 1,500,000$ 33% 495,000$ $ 1,005,000

2015 Fire Station #3 - Relocation and Expansion; Construction 15,000 1.00 6,000,000$ 33% 1,980,000$ $ 4,020,000

2021 Fire Station #14 15,000 5.00 5,100,000$ 33% 1,683,000$ $ 3,417,000

Apparatus

2021 Truck for Fire Station #14 to serve Southwest growth 950,000$ 100% 950,000$ $ -

Total Infrastructure 13,550,000$ 5,108,000$ 8,442,000$

Plus Cost of Fee-Related Research

Impact Fee Study 11,150$ 100% 11,150$ $ -

Standards of Cover Study 50,000$ 50% 25,000$ $ 25,000

Minus Impact Fee Fund Balance 3,427,416$ 3,427,416$

Grand Total 10,183,734$ 1,716,734$ 8,467,000$

Notes: Impact Fee Fund Balance as of 3/1/12

Portion Impact FeeAttributable Eligible

Salt Lake City Police DepartmentCapital Improvement Plan, 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained

Square Acreage Estimated Other Funding

Type of Capital Facility Feet Cost Sourcesto Growth

Facilities 2014 Police Evidence and Crime Lab Facility 100,000 2.00 9,000,000$ 25% 2,250,000$ $ 6,750,000

Total Infrastructure 9,000,000$ 2,250,000$ 6,750,000$


Impact Fee Study 11,150$ 100% 11,150$ $ -

Minus Impact Fee Fund Balance 1,998,649$ 1,998,649$

Grand Total 7,012,501$ 262,501$ 6,750,000$

Notes:

Portion Impact FeeAttributable Eligible

Salt Lake City Parks DivisionCapital Improvement Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained Assumes Full Cost Parks Impact Fees

Acres/ Estimated Approved Portion Impact Fee Other FundingType of Capital Facility Miles Cost FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year total times Attributable equals Eligible Sources

to Growth

Parks/Open Space Acquisition and Development Additional acres of developed parks to continue current level of service for growth 44.58 15,603,000$ -$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 1,733,667$ 15,603,000$ 100% $ 15,603,000 -$ Additional acres of open space to continue current level of service for growth 54.30 543,000$ -$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 543,000$ 100% $ 543,000 Additional non growth-related open space acquisition TBD 2,100,000$ -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,100,000$ 0% $ - 2,100,000$

Trail/Shared Use Pathway DevelopmentJordan and Salt Lake (McClelland) Canal Shared Use Pathway 4,000,000$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ 4,000,000$ 10% $ 400,000 3,600,000$ City Creek Trail 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ 10% $ 120,000 1,080,000$

Improvements to Existing Parks - Specific projects to be determined on an annual basis Includes playgrounds, restrooms, fields, courts, paths, pavilions, plazas, off-leash dog parksskate parks, BMX/bike parks, irrigation and landscaping, and other miscellaneous improvements

Playground Improvements 1,816,200$ 116,200$ 150,000$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 1,816,200$ 0% $ - 1,816,200$

Restroom Improvements 3,000,000$ 25,000$ 275,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 325,000$ 375,000$ 125,000$ 3,000,000$ 11% $ 300,000 2,700,000$

Multipurpose Field Improvements 950,000$ -$ -$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 950,000$ 0% $ - 950,000$

Basketball Improvements 150,000$ -$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 150,000$ 0% $ - 150,000$

Tennis Court Improvements 4,613,400$ 130,500$ 457,900$ 875,000$ 1,400,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 350,000$ 4,613,400$ 0% $ - 4,613,400$

Volleyball Court Improvements 70,000$ -$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 70,000$ 0% $ - 70,000$

Softball Field Improvements 400,000$ -$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 400,000$ 0% $ - 400,000$

Baseball Field Improvements 1,400,000$ -$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 1,400,000$ 0% $ - 1,400,000$

Jogging/Walking Path Improvements 501,608$ 410,608$ 91,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 501,608$ 3% $ 16,000 485,608$

Pavilion Improvements 1,200,000$ -$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 1,200,000$ 0% $ - 1,200,000$

Plaza Improvements 1,200,000$ -$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 1,200,000$ 4% $ 50,000 1,150,000$

Off-Leash Dog Park Improvements 500,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 500,000$ 3% $ 12,500 487,500$

Skate Park Improvements 700,000$ -$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 700,000$ 0% $ - 700,000$

BMX/Bike Park Improvements 300,000$ -$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 300,000$ 5% $ 15,000 285,000$

Miscellaneous AmenitiesDrinking Fountains 70,000$ -$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 70,000$ 0% $ - 70,000$ Picnic Tables 240,000$ -$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 240,000$ 0% $ - 240,000$ Horseshoes 15,000$ -$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 15,000$ 0% $ - 15,000$ Water Features 250,000$ -$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 250,000$ 0% $ - 250,000$ Bridges 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 0% $ - 250,000$ Bleachers 112,000$ -$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 112,000$ 0% $ - 112,000$ Benches 90,000$ -$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 90,000$ 0% $ - 90,000$ Earthen Trails 375,223$ 150,223$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 375,223$ 0% $ - 375,223$ Concessions 500,000$ -$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 500,000$ 0% $ - 500,000$

Other ImprovementsLandscaping 2,305,000$ -$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 2,305,000$ 0% $ - 2,305,000$ Lighting 694,770$ 102,710$ 232,060$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 694,770$ 0% $ - 694,770$ Irrigation 2,394,220$ 616,820$ -$ 500,000$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 2,394,220$ 0% $ - 2,394,220$ Fencing 350,000$ -$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 350,000$ 0% $ - 350,000$ Asphalt 1,182,020$ 295,020$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 1,182,020$ 0% $ - 1,182,020$ Signage 312,093$ 312,093$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 312,093$ 0% $ - 312,093$

Cemetery 2,000,000$ -$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 2,000,000$ 0% $ - 2,000,000$

Total Improvements to Existing Parks 27,941,534$ 2,159,174$ 2,590,849$ 3,992,389$ 3,735,589$ 3,035,589$ 3,035,589$ 2,685,589$ 2,285,589$ 2,335,589$ 2,085,589$ 27,941,534$ 393,500$ 27,548,034$

Percent for Art 500,000$ 65,000$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 500,000$ 0% $ - 500,000$

Cost Overruns 300,000$ 16,294$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 300,000$ 0% $ - 300,000$

Total Infrastructure 52,187,534$ 2,240,468$ 5,714,705$ 7,116,245$ 7,709,445$ 4,909,445$ 4,909,445$ 5,309,445$ 4,609,445$ 5,709,445$ 3,959,445$ 52,187,534$ 17,059,500$ 35,128,034$

Plus Cost of CIP/Fee-Related Research

Impact Fee Study 11,150$ $11,150 11,150$ 100% $ 11,150 -$ Parks Recovery Plan 50,000$ $50,000 50,000$ 0% $ - 50,000$ Parks, Open Space and Trails Master Plan 75,000$ $75,000 75,000$ 5% $ 3,750 71,250$ Jordan River Master Plan 100,000$ $50,000 $50,000 100,000$ 5% $ 5,000 95,000$ Foothills Recreation and Management Plan 75,000$ $75,000 75,000$ 5% $ 3,750 71,250$

Total Infrastructure Plus CIP/Fee-Related Research 52,498,684$ 2,240,468$ 5,839,705$ 7,166,245$ 7,759,445$ 4,920,595$ 4,984,445$ 5,309,445$ 4,609,445$ 5,709,445$ 3,959,445$ 52,498,684$ 17,083,150$ 35,415,534$

Minus Impact Fee Balance 1,184,928$ $1,184,928 1,184,928$ 100% $ 1,184,928 -$

Grand Total 51,313,756$ 2,240,468$ 4,654,777$ 7,166,245$ 7,759,445$ 4,920,595$ 4,984,445$ 5,309,445$ 4,609,445$ 5,709,445$ 3,959,445$ $51,313,756 15,898,222$ 35,415,534$

Funded FY11-12 Unit Cost Total Cost Growth Growth Cost

Replacement/ Repair R&R Cost Impact Fees

General Fund/ CDBG

Playgrounds TOTAL COSTGF 1 Herman Franks 1 116,200$ 116,200$ 1 116,200$

2013? 2 Lindsey Gardens 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 3 Fairmont 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 4 Swede Town 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 5 Poplar Grove 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 6 Popperton 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 7 Cotton 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 8 Stratford 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 9 Sunnyside 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

10 Jordan 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 11 Riverside 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

1,816,200$ -$ 1,816,200$ -$ 1,816,200$ 1,816,200$

Other Priorities12 Jefferson 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 13 Pugsley Ouray 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 14 Jordan 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 15 Wasatch Hollow 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 16 Fairmont 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 17 Taufer 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 18 Jordan 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 19 Laird Park 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 20 Liberty 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 21 6th East 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 22 Sorenson 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 23 Post Street Tot Lot 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 24 Redwood Meadows 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 25 Richmond 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 27 Inglewood 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 28 Westpointe 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 29 Galagher Tot Lot 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 30 Peoples Freeway Park 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 31 Kletting 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$

RestroomsGF 1 Rotary Glen-design 1 25,000$ 1 25,000$

2013? 1 Rotary Glen 1 275,000$ 1 275,000$ 2 Warm Springs 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 3 Parley's Historic Nature 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 4 Glendale Park 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 5 Poplar Grove 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 6 Wasatch Hollow 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 7 Cottonwood 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 8 Pioneer 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 9 Herman Franks 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$

11 Memory Grove Pavillion 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 3,000,000$ 300,000$ 2,700,000$ 300,000$ 2,700,000$ 3,000,000$

Other Priorities10 Fairmont 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 12 Jordan 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 13 Lindsey Garden 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 14 9th South River 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 15 Sherwood Park 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 16 Riverside 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 17 Herman Franks 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 18 Westpointe 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 19 Jordan 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 20 Riverside 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 22 Fairmont 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 23 Pioneer 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$ 24 Riverside 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 300,000$

Multipurpose Fields1 Fairmont 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 2 Fairmont 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 3 Fairmont 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 4 Fairmont 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 5 Jordan 2 100,000$ 200,000$ 2 200,000$ 6 Rosewood 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$

950,000$ -$ 950,000$ -$ 950,000$ 950,000$

Other Priorities7 Sorenson 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 1 100,000$ 8 Laird 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 1 100,000$ 9 Stratford 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 1 100,000$

10 Westpointe 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 11 Riverside 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ 12 Dilworth 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 1 100,000$

Basketball Courts1 Swede Town 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$ 2 Madsen 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$

150,000$ -$ 150,000$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ Council wants to address indoor BB courts at Futsal and Steiner with ZAP Bond in 2016-17 (cost estimate needed)

Other Priorities3 Pioneer 40,000$ -$ 1 -$ 4 Poplar Grove 40,000$ -$ 1 -$

Tennis CourtsGF 1 Sunnyside/Pioneer/Reservoir - resurfacing 5 63,400$ 5 63,400$

CDBG 2 5th Ave & C Street -design 1 67,100$ 1 67,100$ 2013 3 5th Ave & C Street - reconstruction 1 107,900$ 1 107,900$ 2013 4 Lindsey Gardens 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 2014 5 Fairmont 5 175,000$ 875,000$ 5 875,000$ 2015 6 Dee Glen Smith 4 175,000$ 700,000$ 4 700,000$ 2015 7 Fire Station 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 2015 8 Warm Springs 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 2017 9 11th Avenue 8 175,000$ 1,400,000$ 8 1,400,000$ 2017 10 Victory Park 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$

4,613,400$ -$ 4,613,400$ -$ 4,613,400$ 4,613,400$

Other Priorities11 Riverside 4 175,000$ 700,000$ 4 700,000$ 12 Jordan 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 13 Poplar Grove 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 14 Westpointe 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 15 Ensign Downs 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 16 Dilworth 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$ 17 Reservior 2 175,000$ 350,000$ 2 350,000$

Volleyball Courts1 Sherwood 1 35,000$ 35,000$ 1 35,000$ 2 Richmond 1 35,000$ 35,000$ 1 35,000$

70,000$ -$ 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ 70,000$

Other Priorities3 Jordan 1 35,000$ 35,000$ 1 35,000$

Softball Fields1 Lindsey Gardens 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 2 Ensign Downs 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

400,000$ -$ 400,000$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$

Other Priorities3 Riverside 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

Baseball Fields1 Lindsey Gardens 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 2 Herman Franks 3 200,000$ 600,000$ 3 600,000$ 3 Glendale 2 200,000$ 400,000$ 2 400,000$ 4 Rosewood 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

1,400,000$ -$ 1,400,000$ -$ 1,400,000$ 1,400,000$

Other Priorities5 Sorenson 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 6 Poplar Grove 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 7 Westpointe 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ 8 Dilworth 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

Jogging/Walking PathsGF 1 Memory Grove 299,078$ 1 299,078$ GF 2 Wasatch Hollow Open Space 111,530$ 1 111,530$

2013 4 Riverview 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$ 2013 5 17th S RiverPark 1 16,000$ 16,000$ 1 16,000$

501,608$ 16,000$ 485,608$ 16,000$ 485,608$ 501,608$

Other Priorities6 City Creek Park 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 1 50,000$ 7 Cottonwood 1 4,000$ 4,000$ 1 4,000$ 8 11th Avenue 1 4,000$ 4,000$ 1 4,000$ 9 Hidden Hollow 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$

10 Ensign

Pavilions1 Rotary Glen 1 400,000$ 400,000$ 1 400,000$ 2 Jordan 2 400,000$ 800,000$ 2 800,000$

1,200,000$ -$ 1,200,000$ -$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$

Other Priorities3 Riverside 1 400,000$ 400,000$ 1 400,000$ 4 Cottonwood 4 400,000$ 1,600,000$ 4 1,600,000$

Plazas1 Pioneer 1 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1 50,000$ 950,000$ 2 Artesian Well 1 200,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

1,200,000$ 50,000$ 1,150,000$ 50,000$ 1,150,000$ 1,200,000$

Other Priorities3 City Creek 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 1 50,000$ 4 Nelli Jack 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1 25,000$ 5 First Encampment 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 1 50,000$

Off-Leash Dog Area2014 1 New Dog Park - Fairmont (Council Request) 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$

2 Parley's Historic Nature Park 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 12,500$ 1 237,500$ 500,000$ 12,500$ 487,500$ 12,500$ 487,500$ 500,000$

Other Priorities3 Memory Grove 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ 4 Lindsey Gardens 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 12,500$ 237,500$ 5 Herman Franks 1 400,000$ 400,000$ 1 400,000$ 6 Jordan 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 25,000$ 225,000$ 7 Rosewood 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 25,000$ 225,000$

Skate ParksFairmont or Jordan (not yet prioritized) 1 700,000$ 700,000$ 1 700,000$

700,000$ -$ 700,000$ -$ 700,000$ 700,000$

Other PrioritiesFairmont or Jordan 1 700,000$ 700,000$ 1 700,000$

BMX and Bike ParksParley's Historic Nature Park 1 300,000$ 300,000$ 1 15,000$ 285,000$

300,000$ 15,000$ 285,000$ 15,000$ 285,000$ 300,000$ Council wants to look at new areas/options for BMX users

Drinking Fountains20 drinking fountains-various parks 20 3,500$ 70,000$ 20 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ 70,000$

70,000$ -$ 70,000$

Other Priorities20 drinking fountains - various parks 20 3,500$ 70,000$ 20 70,000$ Cottonwood 1Fairmont 2Herman Franks 2Int'l Peace Gardens 1Jordan 2Riverside 1Warm Springs 1Washington Square 211th Avenue 19th South 1City Creek 1Donner Trail 1Ensign Downs 1Lindsey Gardens 1Pioneer Park 1Poplar Grove 2Popperton 1Reservoir 1Richmond 1Rotary Glen 1Stratford 1Victory 1Westpointe 2Artesian Well 1Cotton 1Curtis 1Davis 1Faultline 1Inglewood 1Post Street Tot Lot 1Puglsey Ouray 1Taufer 1Glendale 2

Picnic Tables120 tables - various parks 120 2,000$ 240,000$ 120 240,000$

240,000$ -$ 240,000$ -$ 240,000$ 240,000$

Other Priorities120 tables - various parks 120 2,000$ 240,000$ 1 240,000$ LibertyWashington ParkCottonwoodFairmontJordanMemory GroveRiversideRosewoodSunnysideWarm Springs11th Avenue9th SouthDonner TrailLairdLindsey GardensMadsenPoplar GrovePoppertonReservoirRotary GlenRichmondSherwoodStratfordWestpointeCottonFaultlineGuadalupeJacksonTaufer

HorseshoesJordan or Riverside (not yet prioritized) 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$

15,000$ -$ 15,000$ -$ -$ -$

Other PrioritiesJordan or Riverside (not yet prioritized) 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$

Water FeaturesFairmont/Library Square/Memory Grove 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ (not yet prioritized) 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$

Other PrioritiesFairmont/Library Square/Memory Grove 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ Fairmont/Library Square/Memory Grove 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ Council suggested Jordan Park 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$

Bridges1 Wasatch Hollow Open Space 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$

250,000$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$

Other Priorities1 Council Requested - Line Bridge need cost estimate2 Council Requested - Jordan River at Indiana3 Riverview 1 750,000$ 750,000$ 1 750,000$ 4 Parley's Historic Nature Park 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ 5 Fairmont 2 5,000$ 10,000$ 2 10,000$

Bleachers1 Oak Hills Ball Diamonds 2 8,000$ 16,000$ 2 16,000$ 2 Sunnyside 2 8,000$ 16,000$ 2 16,000$ 3 Sherwood 6 8,000$ 48,000$ 6 48,000$ 4 Herman Franks 4 8,000$ 32,000$ 4 32,000$

112,000$ -$ 112,000$ -$ 48,000$ 48,000$

Other Priorities5 Lindsey Gardens 8,000$ -$ 2 -$ 6 Riverside 8,000$ -$ 4 -$ 7 Rosewood 8,000$ -$ 4 -$ 8 Ensign Downs 8,000$ -$ 1 -$ 9 Westpointe 8,000$ -$ 3 -$

Benches-no priority order30 benches - various parks 30 3,000$ 90,000$ 30 90,000$

90,000$ -$ 90,000$ -$ 90,000$ 90,000$ Sorenson 4Wasatch Hollow 3Washington Square 25Dilworth 2Jefferson 2Madsen 3Pioneer 2Richmond 5Galagher Tot Lot 1Post Street Tot Lot 3Redwood Meadows 3Swede Town 3Nelli Jack 2

Other Priorities30 benches - various parks 30 3,000$ 90,000$ 1 90,000$

Earthen TrailsGF 1 Parley's Historic Nature Park 1 150,223$ 1 150,223$

2 Miller Bird Refuge 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$ 3 Ensign Peak 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$ 4 Wasatch Hollow Open Space 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$

375,223$ -$ 375,223$ -$ 375,223$ 375,223$

Other Priorities5 Bonneville Shoreline Preserve 1 4,000$ 4,000$ 1 4,000$ 6 H-Rock 1 4,000$ 4,000$ 1 4,000$ 7 Riverview 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ 8 Rotary Park 1 1,500$ 1,500$ 1 1,500$ 9 Bend-In-The-River 1 1,000$ 1,000$ 1 1,000$

10 Twin Peaks 1 1,500$ 1,500$ 1 1,500$

Concessions1 Riverside 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ 2 Poplar Grove 1 125,000$ 125,000$ 1 125,000$ 3 Oak Hills Ball Diamonds 1 125,000$ 125,000$ 1 125,000$

500,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$

Other Priorities4 Sunnyside 1 125,000$ 125,000$ 1 125,000$ 5 Herman Franks 2 250,000$ 500,000$ 2 500,000$ 6 Dee Glen Smith Tennis 1 500,000$ 500,000$ 1 500,000$

Landscaping1 11th Avenue 1 30,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ 2 Wasatch Hollow Open Space 1 675,000$ 675,000$ 1 675,000$ 3 Parley's Historic Nature Park 1 1,275,000$ 1,275,000$ 1 1,275,000$ 4 Faultline 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ 5 Miller Bird Refuge 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ 6 Fairmont 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ 7 Sorenson 1 7,000$ 7,000$ 1 7,000$ 8 Sunnyside 1 30,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ 9 Wasatch Hollow Park 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 1 8,000$

2,305,000$ -$ 2,305,000$ -$ 2,305,000$ 2,305,000$

Other PrioritiesCity Creek 1 250,000$ 250,000$ 1 250,000$ Dilworth 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Gilgal 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ Oak Hills Ball Diamonds 1 500$ 500$ 1 500$ Poplar Grove 1 2,000$ 2,000$ 1 2,000$ Reservoir 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Richmond 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ Rotary Glen 1 150,000$ 150,000$ 1 150,000$ Stratford 1 500$ 500$ 1 500$ Victory Park 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ 10th E Senior 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ 6th East 1 1,000$ 1,000$ 1 1,000$ Artesian Well 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Curtis 1 2,000$ 2,000$ 1 2,000$ Davis 1 1,000$ 1,000$ 1 1,000$ First Encampment 1 1,000$ 1,000$ 1 1,000$ 10th East Islands 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ 12th East/South Temple 1 500$ 500$ 1 500$ 13th Avenue and J 1 500$ 500$ 1 500$ 4th Avenue Stairs 1 1,000$ 1,000$ 1 1,000$ Foothill Islands 1 500$ 500$ 1 500$ Glendale 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Research Parks Islands 1 500$ 500$ 1 500$ 8th West 1 500$ 500$ 1 500$ Bend-In-The-River 1 1,000$ 1,000$ 1 1,000$ Bonneville Shoreline Preserve 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ Ensign Peak Nature Park 1 10,000$ 10,000$ 1 10,000$ Ensign Peak Nature Park and Trailhead 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ Hidden Hollow Natural Area 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ H-Rock 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Jordan River Parkway 1 30,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ Modesto Park 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Riverview 1 750,000$ 750,000$ 1 750,000$

LightingGF 1 Faultline 1 45,650$ 1 45,650$ GF 2 Jordan River Trail - 500 North to 1000 North 1 57,060$ 1 57,060$

2013 3 Council Requested - Jordan River Trail 200 to 7 1 57,060$ 1 57,060$ 2013 4 Council Requested - Herman Franks Park 1 75,000$ 1 75,000$ 2013 5 Fairmont Park 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 1 100,000$

6 First Encampment 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ 7 Donner Trail 1 30,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ 8 Artesian Well 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ 9 Elizabeth Sherman 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$

10 Library Square 1 145,000$ 145,000$ 1 145,000$ 11 North Gateway Park 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 1 50,000$ 12 Riverside Park 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$

694,770$ -$ 694,770$ -$ 694,770$ 694,770$

Other PrioritiesRosewood Park 1 60,000$ 60,000$ 1 60,000$ Warm Springs Park 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 1 50,000$ Wasatch Hollow Park 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ 9th South 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 1 50,000$ Madsen 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Richmond 1 30,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ Stratford 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Westpointe 1 75,000$ 75,000$ 1 75,000$ Cotton 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Galagher Tot Lot 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ Jackson 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ Miami 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Pugsley Ouray 1 10,000$ 10,000$ 1 10,000$ Redwood 1 40,000$ 40,000$ 1 40,000$ Silver 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ Steenblik 1 30,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ Swede Town 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ Taufer 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1 25,000$ Westminster 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ Glendale 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Roberta Laconia 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$

Irrigation acresGF 1 10th E Senior 11,920$ 1 11,920$

CDBG 2 Cottonwood 25.00 400,000$ 1 400,000$ CDBG 3 6th East (S Temple-6th S) 2.80 204,900$ 1 204,900$ 2014 4 Parley's Historic Nature Park 25.00 20,000$ 500,000$ 1 500,000$

5 12 East (S Temple-5S) 2.46 20,000$ 49,200$ 1 49,200$ 6 Rosewood 22.25 20,000$ 445,000$ 1 445,000$ 7 Popperton 29.16 20,000$ 583,200$ 1 583,200$ 8 Wasatch Hollow Open Space 10.00 20,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

2,394,220$ -$ 2,394,220$ -$ 2,394,220$ 2,394,220$

Other PrioritiesJordan 33.50 20,000$ 670,000$ 1 670,000$ Pioneer 10.00 20,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ Washington Square 11.00 20,000$ 220,000$ 1 220,000$ Bend-In-The-River 4.25 20,000$ 85,000$ 1 85,000$ Dee Glen Smith 2.75 20,000$ 55,000$ 1 55,000$ Hillcrest 0.75 20,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ Memory Grove 8.75 20,000$ 175,000$ 1 175,000$ Sunnyside 25.50 20,000$ 510,000$ 1 510,000$ Warm Springs 9.00 20,000$ 180,000$ 1 180,000$ Wasatch Hollow 3.55 20,000$ 71,000$ 1 71,000$ 11th Avenue 25.00 20,000$ 500,000$ 1 500,000$ 5th Ave. & "C" Street 0.37 20,000$ 7,400$ 1 7,400$ City Creek 4.00 20,000$ 80,000$ 1 80,000$ Dilworth 4.50 20,000$ 90,000$ 1 90,000$ Donner Trail 17.00 20,000$ 340,000$ 1 340,000$ Glendale Park 0.75 20,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ Gilgal 0.95 20,000$ 19,000$ 1 19,000$ Kay Rees Park 5.35 20,000$ 107,000$ 1 107,000$ Madsen 2.00 20,000$ 40,000$ 1 40,000$ Parley's Way 3.37 20,000$ 67,400$ 1 67,400$ Poplar Grove 6.75 20,000$ 135,000$ 1 135,000$ Reservoir 6.50 20,000$ 130,000$ 1 130,000$ Rotary Glen 24.50 20,000$ 490,000$ 1 490,000$ Stratford 2.00 20,000$ 40,000$ 1 40,000$ Westside Senior 2.00 20,000$ 40,000$ 1 40,000$ 6th East Park 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Artesian Well 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Beatrice Evans Park 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Cotton Park 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Curtis Park 1.25 20,000$ 25,000$ 1 25,000$ Davis Park 0.50 20,000$ 10,000$ 1 10,000$

Faultline 1.00 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ Guadalupe Park 1.00 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ Jackson Park 1.00 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ Kletting 0.50 20,000$ 10,000$ 1 10,000$ Post Street Tot Lot 0.50 20,000$ 10,000$ 1 10,000$ Redwood Meadows 1.25 20,000$ 25,000$ 1 25,000$ Silver Park 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Steenblik Park 2.00 20,000$ 40,000$ 1 40,000$ Swede Town 0.75 20,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ City Creek 5.00 20,000$ 100,000$ 1 100,000$ Ensign Peak Nature Park 126.99 20,000$ 2,539,800$ 1 2,539,800$ Ensign Peak Nature Park and Trailhead 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Hidden Hollow Natural Area 3.19 20,000$ 63,800$ 1 63,800$ H-Rock 50.20 20,000$ 1,004,000$ 1 1,004,000$ Jordan River Parkway 74.44 20,000$ 1,488,800$ 1 1,488,800$ Miller Bird Refuge 8.68 20,000$ 173,600$ 1 173,600$ Modesto Park 4.70 20,000$ 94,000$ 1 94,000$ Regional Athletic Complex 26.85 20,000$ 537,000$ 1 537,000$ Riverview 10.51 20,000$ 210,200$ 1 210,200$ 10th E. Islands 0.86 20,000$ 17,200$ 1 17,200$ 1300 East Parking 1.75 20,000$ 35,000$ 1 35,000$ 1300 South 1500 East 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ 13th Ave. & J 0.06 20,000$ 1,200$ 1 1,200$ 13th East 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ 13th South Island 1.03 20,000$ 20,600$ 1 20,600$ 2 West (6N-Wall) 1.60 20,000$ 32,000$ 1 32,000$ 2nd South Islands 0.18 20,000$ 3,600$ 1 3,600$ 200 West (N Temple -4N) 0.17 20,000$ 3,400$ 1 3,400$ 8th West Islands (100 S-300 N) 1.50 20,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ 7th East (13S-21S) 3.50 20,000$ 70,000$ 1 70,000$ 8th West (6-9s) 4.50 20,000$ 90,000$ 1 90,000$ Elizabeth Sherman 1.50 20,000$ 30,000$ 1 30,000$ Federal Heights Islands 0.63 20,000$ 12,600$ 1 12,600$ Foothills Islands 0.67 20,000$ 13,400$ 1 13,400$ Harvard Islands 0.37 20,000$ 7,400$ 1 7,400$ Jefferson Circle 2.00 20,000$ 40,000$ 1 40,000$ Laird Circle 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Normandy 0.04 20,000$ 800$ 1 800$ Oneida 0.75 20,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ Prison Island 0.50 20,000$ 10,000$ 1 10,000$ Research Park Islands 8.47 20,000$ 169,400$ 1 169,400$ Skyline Island 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ 17th South Retention 0.75 20,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ 349 Plaza 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Almond Park 0.10 20,000$ 2,000$ 1 2,000$ Court Building 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Weseman 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Nelli Jack Park 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Roberta LaConia 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Stanton 0.25 20,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Washington Park Parleys 10.00 20,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$ Mountain Dell 10.00 20,000$ 200,000$ 1 200,000$

Fencing1 Parley's Historic Nature Park 1 265,000$ 265,000$ 1 265,000$ 2 Ensign Peak Nature Park 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 1 20,000$ 3 Wasatch Hollow Open Space 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1 25,000$ 4 Miller Bird Refuge 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ 5 Riverview 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1 25,000$

350,000$ -$ 350,000$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$

Other PrioritiesJordan River Parkway 1 800,000$ 800,000$ 1 800,000$ Riverside 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Sorensen 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Sunnyside 1 10,000$ 10,000$ 1 10,000$ Rotary Glen 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 1 15,000$ Sherwood 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$ Victory 1 2,500$ 2,500$ 1 2,500$ Hidden Hollow Natural Area 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 1 8,000$ H-Rock 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 1 8,000$ Modesto Park 1 5,000$ 5,000$ 1 5,000$

AsphaltGF 1 Jordan River Trail Repaving 1 295,020$ 295,020$ 1 295,020$

1 Rosewood 1 91,000$ 91,000$ 1 91,000$ 2 Lindsey Gardens 1 52,000$ 52,000$ 1 52,000$ 3 Rotary Glen 1 76,000$ 76,000$ 1 76,000$ 4 10th E Senior 1 105,000$ 105,000$ 1 105,000$ 5 Sunnyside 1 183,000$ 183,000$ 1 183,000$ 6 Memory Grove 1 380,000$ 380,000$ 1 380,000$

1,182,020$ -$ 1,182,020$ -$ 1,182,020$ 1,182,020$

Other PrioritiesSherwood 1 94,000$ 94,000$ 1 94,000$ Silver 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 1 11,000$ Almond 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 1 11,000$ 11th Avenue 1 35,000$ 35,000$ 1 35,000$ 9th South 1 26,000$ 26,000$ 1 26,000$ Popperton 1 22,000$ 22,000$ 1 22,000$ Steiner Aquatics 1 352,000$ 352,000$ 1 352,000$

SignageGF Open Space Signage Citywide: 312,093$ 312,093$

Parley's Historic Nature ParkEnsign Peak Nature Park and TrailheadWasatch Hollow Open SpaceJordan River Parkway Miller Bird RefugeBonneville Shoreline TrailH-RockHidden Hollow

312,093$ -$ 312,093$ -$ 312,093$ 312,093$

Other PrioritiesModesto Park 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ Bend-In-The-River 4 3,000$ 12,000$ 1 12,000$ Alan Parsons-BST 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ City Creek 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 1 11,000$ Popperton Park 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ Riverview 1 6,000$ 6,000$ 1 6,000$ Rotary Park 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$ Twin Peaks 1 3,000$ 3,000$ 1 3,000$

Cemetery 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ -$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$

27,941,534$ 393,500$ 27,548,034$ 393,500$ 27,548,034$ 27,941,534$

Salt Lake City Streets/Transportation DivisionsCapital Improvement Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained

Estimated ApprovedType of Capital Facility Cost FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year total

Roadway Projects1300 South Viaduct Rehabilitation 10,000,000$ 200,000$ 9,520,000$ 280,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$ 500/700 South - 2800 West to 5600 West 14,760,000$ 4,070,000$ 3,160,000$ 2,810,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,320,000$ -$ -$ -$ 14,760,000$ ADA Accessible Ramps 1,300,000$ 506,175$ 88,000$ 88,000$ 88,000$ 88,000$ 88,000$ 88,000$ 88,000$ 88,000$ 89,825$ 1,300,000$ Sidewalk Rehabilitation/Sawcutting 700,000$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 700,000$ Deteriorated Sidewalk Replacement 1,300,000$ 402,700$ 99,700$ 250,000$ 78,229$ 78,229$ 78,229$ 78,229$ 78,229$ 78,229$ 78,229$ 1,300,000$ Indiana Avenue/900 South from Redwood to 3600 West 3,640,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 1,800,000$ 540,000$ -$ -$ 3,640,000$ Gladiola Street - 1650 South to 2100 South 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,900,000$ -$ 1,100,000$ 4,000,000$ 4400 West from 700 South to 850 South 1,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250000 1,350,000$ 1,600,000$ Street Pavement Overlay and Preservation 7,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 400,000$ 7,000,000$ Local Street Reconstruction 6,500,000$ 950,034$ 620,000$ 620,000$ 620,000$ 620,000$ 620,000$ 620,000$ 620,000$ 620,000$ 589,966$ 6,500,000$ Major Rehabilitation and Reconstruction of City Streets 8,360,000$ 596,000$ 440,600$ 795,850$ 884,000$ 780,800$ 1,045,250$ 972,150$ 776,500$ 1,163,500$ 905,350$ 8,360,000$ Concrete Street Rehabilitation 2,000,000$ 756,800$ 140,000$ 140,000$ 140,000$ 140,000$ 140,000$ 140,000$ 140,000$ 140,000$ 123,200$ 2,000,000$ Bridge Rehabilitation 180,000$ -$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 180,000$ Percent for Art 500,000$ 65,000$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 500,000$ Cost Overruns 300,000$ 16,294$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 300,000$

62,140,000$ 9,063,003$ 14,968,156$ 5,833,706$ 5,060,085$ 4,876,885$ 3,821,335$ 4,548,235$ 5,992,585$ 3,189,585$ 4,786,426$ 62,140,000$ Transportation Projects

Replacement Traffic Signals 2,400,000$ 480,000$ -$ 160,000$ 320,000$ 160,000$ 320,000$ 160,000$ 320,000$ 160,000$ 320,000$ 2,400,000$ Pedestrian Safety Devices 250,000$ 120,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Bike Lane/Pedestrian Improvements - Citywide 7,020,000$ 550,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,520,000$ 1,950,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,020,000$ New Traffic Signals 1,440,000$ -$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 1,440,000$ 1300 East Traffic Safety - Phase 2 500,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Street Lighting Replacement 200,000$ 40,000$ 160,000$ 200,000$

11,810,000$ 1,190,000$ 2,685,000$ 2,865,000$ 2,615,000$ 345,000$ 510,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 11,810,000$

Total Infrastructure $73,950,000 $10,253,003 $17,653,156 $8,698,706 $7,675,085 $5,221,885 $4,331,335 $4,868,235 $6,472,585 $3,509,585 $5,266,426 $73,950,000


Impact Fee Study 11,150$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,150$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,150$ Transportation Master Plan 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$

Minus Impact Fee Balance 5,441,542$ 3,420,000$ 2,021,542$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,441,542$

Grand Total $68,719,608 $6,833,003 $15,731,614 $8,798,706 $7,675,085 5,233,035$ 4,331,335$ 4,868,235$ 6,472,585$ 3,509,585$ 5,266,426$ $68,719,608

Salt Lake City Streets/Transportation DivisionsCapital Improvement Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained

Estimated Portion Impact Fee Other FundingType of Capital Facility Cost times Attributable equals Eligible Sources General Fund Class C CDBG Impact Fees FHWA Other Total

to Growth 7% (including fund balance)

Roadway Projects1300 South Viaduct Rehabilitation 10,000,000$ 0% $ - 10,000,000$ -$ 480,000$ -$ -$ $9,320,000 200,000$ 10,000,000$ 500/700 South - 2800 West to 5600 West 14,760,000$ 57% $ 8,413,200 6,346,800$ 3,173,400$ 3,173,400$ -$ 8,413,200$ -$ -$ 14,760,000$ ADA Accessible Ramps 1,300,000$ 0% $ - 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ Sidewalk Rehabilitation/Sawcutting 700,000$ 0% $ - 700,000$ 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ Deteriorated Sidewalk Replacement 1,300,000$ 0% $ - 1,300,000$ (204,175)$ -$ 1,504,175$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ Indiana Avenue/900 South from Redwood to 3600 West 3,640,000$ 57% $ 2,074,800 1,565,200$ 782,600$ 782,600$ -$ 2,074,800$ -$ -$ 3,640,000$ Gladiola Street - 1650 South to 2100 South 4,000,000$ 57% $ 2,280,000 1,720,000$ 860,000$ 860,000$ -$ 2,280,000$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 4400 West from 700 South to 850 South 1,600,000$ 57% $ 912,000 688,000$ 344,000$ 344,000$ -$ 912,000$ -$ -$ 1,600,000$ Street Pavement Overlay and Preservation 7,000,000$ 0% $ - 7,000,000$ -$ 7,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,000,000$ Local Street Reconstruction 6,500,000$ 0% $ - 6,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,500,000$ Major Rehabilitation and Reconstruction of City Streets 8,360,000$ 0% $ - 8,360,000$ -$ 6,360,000$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 8,360,000$ Concrete Street Rehabilitation 2,000,000$ 0% $ - 2,000,000$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ Bridge Rehabilitation 180,000$ 0% $ - 180,000$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000$ Percent for Art 500,000$ 0% $ - 500,000$ 350,000$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Cost Overruns 300,000$ 0% $ - 300,000$ 50,000$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$

62,140,000$ 13,680,000$ 48,460,000$ 9,735,825$ 24,000,000$ 5,204,175$ 13,680,000$ 9,320,000$ 200,000$ 62,140,000$ Transportation Projects

Replacement Traffic Signals 2,400,000$ 0% -$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,400,000$ Pedestrian Safety Devices 250,000$ 10% $ 25,000 225,000$ 225,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Bike Lane/Pedestrian Improvements - Citywide 7,020,000$ 10% $ 702,000 6,318,000$ 6,318,000$ -$ -$ 702,000$ -$ 7,020,000$ New Traffic Signals 1,440,000$ 100% $ 1,440,000 -$ -$ -$ 1,440,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000$ 1300 East Traffic Safety - Phase 2 500,000$ 0% $ - 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Street Lighting Replacement 200,000$ 0% $ - 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$

11,810,000$ $ 2,167,000 $ 9,643,000 $ 9,643,000 $ - $ - $ 2,167,000 $0 $0 $11,810,000

Total Infrastructure $73,950,000 15,847,000$ 58,103,000$ 19,378,825$ 24,000,000$ 5,204,175$ 15,847,000$ 9,320,000$ 200,000$ 73,950,000$


Impact Fee Study 11,150$ 100% $ 11,150 -$ 11,150$ 11,150$ Transportation Master Plan 200,000$ 10% $ 20,000 180,000$ 180,000$ 20,000$ 200,000$

Minus Impact Fee Balance 5,441,542$ 100% $ 5,441,542 -$ -$

Grand Total $68,719,608 10,436,608$ 58,283,000$ 19,558,825$ 24,000,000$ 5,204,175$ 15,878,150$ 9,320,000$ 200,000$ 74,161,150$

Council wants to add: Impact Fee Project Allocation General Fund Class C CDBG Impact Fees FHWA Other TotalConcrete replacement study Residential Non-Residential proposed 19,558,825$ 24,000,000$ 5,204,175$ 15,878,150$ 9,320,000$ 200,000$ 74,161,150$ 50/50 program 1,296,909$ 9,139,700$ available funds 19,558,825$ 24,000,000$ 5,204,175$ 15,878,150$ 9,320,000$ 200,000$ 74,161,150$ 500 East from S Temple to 900 S difference -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1300 E from 1700 S/South of I-80 Total 10,436,608$ 1000 West and 700 West - concrete infrastructureIndiana Bridge?Hawk Signals - Chapman Library900 Line Trail ImprovementsParley's Shared Use PathwayJordan and SL Canal PathwaySurplus Canal PathwayTCC CamerasFoothill StudyWestminster College expansion to SouthBusiness District Needs

10 Year TotalsFunding Sources

Salt Lake City Facilities Division This list does not reflect the amount fo funding available each year. Instead, it prioritizes projects for application within each funding year. See Sources and Uses.Capital Facilities Plan 2011-2021

Priority Building Project Estimated Project FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21Cost

1 Pioneer Precinct HVAC System and Lighting Energy Conservation $493,790 $493,7902 Justice Courts HVAC System Upgrade and Energy Conservation $377,100 $377,100

3 CBD - Area 4 Downtown Irrigation Water Conservation and Asset Renewal Project – Design, Engineering and Development. $135,586 $135,586

4 Central Plant Centeral Plant Heating, cooling system and structural study $233,783 $233,783

5 Westside Senior Center Building Shell Retrofit including roofing, siding and gutters. $110,093 $110,093

6 SBD Sugarhouse Business District Irrigation Water Conservation and Asset Renewal Project – Design, Engineering and Development. $291,928 $291,928

7 Spring Mobile Field Energy efficiency project replacing HVAC , Controls, and Lighting systems $663,518 $663,5188 6th South Properties Replace single pane window with Thermal double pane Windows $60,119 $60,1199 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 1st Floor South Half $170,292 $170,292

Admin Req City & County Building Washington Square Event Power, which provides in ground distributed connection points to elminiate the need for portable generators on the East side of the Square. $499,996 $499,996

Admin Req City&County Building Fifth Floor Renovation to office space $884,301 $884,30110 City&County Building Exterior Painting and Repair work at all wood window frames, $190,000 $190,000

11 City&County Building City & County Building, Stone Repairs, this is needed work to restore damage or broken Kyune sand stone and stone sculptures. Consultaing work pending for final scope of restorative and protective work $200,000 $200,000

12 City & County Bldg City & County Building, Stone Upkeep including testing, cleaning, stone hardner and water proofing $1,400,000 $1,400,000

13 CBD - Area 4 Downtown Irrigation Water Conservation and Asset Renewal Project – Construction Work $800,000 $800,00014 Fire Station 5 and 2 Replace single-pane window with Thermal double pane Windows $73,200 $73,200 15 Fire Stations 1,4,6,7 Upgrade Fire station with full DDC controls and intergated system interfaces 900,000 900,00016 City & County Building Design and Construction of New Base Isolator System $1,000,000 $1,000,00017 Fire Stations 9,10,13, Upgrade Fire station with full DDC controls and intergated system interfaces 900,000 900,000

18 Fire Stations 1,4,6,7,9,10,13, Replace heating and Air-conditioning add DDC controls to systems $244,200 $244,200

19 6th South Properties Replace heating and Air-conditioning add DDC controls to systems to remaining properties. $80,500 $80,500

20 Sugarhouse Business Dist

Sugarhouse Business District Irrigation Water Conservation and Asset Renewal Project – Design, Engineering and Development. $268,886 $268,886

21 Sugarhouse Business Dist Sugarhouse Business District Irrigation Water Conservation and Asset Renewal Project – Construction Work $1,200,000 $1,200,000

22 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 3rd Floor South Half $194,620 $194,62023 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 3rd Floor North Half $182,456 $182,45624 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 1st Floor North Half $137,176 $137,17625 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 4th Floor North Half $170,292 $170,29226 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 2nd Floor North Half $158,129 $158,12927 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 2nd Floor South Half $137,176 $137,17628 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 4th Floor South Half $170,292 $170,29229 City & County Building Fan Coil Unit Replacement 5th Floor $206,784 $206,78430 City & County Building 3rd & 5th Floor Carpet, Access Flooring and Electrical Replacement $748,907 $748,90731 City & County Building 2nd Floor, Carpet, Access Flooring and Electrical Replacement $561,681 $561,68132 City & County Building 4th Floor Carpet, Access Flooring and Electrical Replacement $748,907 $748,907

33 Fire Station 4,5, and WSC Parking Lot Repairs and Replacements $338,192 $338,192

34 East Side Senior Center ESSC - Re-roofing of Senior Center $109,800 $109,800

35 City & County Building 1st Floor Carpet, Access Flooring and Electrical Replacement $748,907 $748,907

36 Library Parking Structure Waterproofing of Concrete Structure Joint/Expansion Joint Repairs $305,000 $305,000

37 Plaza 349 Plaza 349 - Parking Structure Repairs and Resurface $261,682 $261,682

38 Spring Mobile Field Spring Mobile Field Concourse “B” Level Waterproofing Project $368,915 $368,91539 Spring Mobile Field Spring Mobile Field – Building Steel and Roof-deck Painting Project $1,079,763 $1,079,763

Salt Lake City Facilities DivisionCapital Facilities Plan 2011-2021

Priority Building Project Estimated Project FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21Cost

40 City & County Building Refinish interior Wood Work, clean, sanding and applying new finhinsh coatings. $150,000 $150,000

41 Memorial House Replace single pane window with Thermal double pane Windows $73,200 $73,200

42 Central Plant Chiller replacment and controls upgrade $300,000 $300,00043 Stiener East HVAC replacment and controls upgrade $800,000 $800,000

Admin Req Fisher Mansion Renovate and Restore Historic Fisher Mansion $1,900,000 $1,900,00044 Fire Station 8 FS 8 Re-roofing of Station Built Up Roofing $61,000 $61,00044 Fire Station 9 FS 9 Re-roofing of Station Built Up Roofing $61,000 $61,000

45 Chase House Replace heating and Air-conditioning add DDC controls to systems $55,000 $55,000

46 Pioneer Precinct Re-roofing of Pioneer Precinct $109,800 $109,800

47 City and County Bldg Replace Main Air-handlers on each floor $1,220,000 $1,220,000

48 Chase House Exterior Painting and Repair work $100,000 $100,000 49 Art Barn Exterior Painting and Repair work $100,000 $100,000 50 SLC Cemetary Exterior Painting and Repair work $100,000 $100,000

51 City&County Building Generator and Fuel Tank Upgrade $250,000 $250,000

52 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Carpet and tile and other floor coverings $250,000 $250,000

53 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Life Safety Systems such as Fire Detection, Fire Suppression $250,000 $250,000

54 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace HVAC and Control Systems $250,000 $250,00055 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Roofs and Insulation and decking $250,000 $250,00056 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Carpet and tile and other floor coverings $250,000 $250,000

57 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Windows and glazing to higher efficiency resistance to cold and heat $250,000 $250,000

58 Various Buildings Address structural and foundation issues identified $250,000 $250,00059 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade water proofing systems $250,000 $250,00060 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade CBD/SBD Pavers and Irrigations systems $250,000 $250,00061 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade Generators and Fuel Systems $250,000 $250,00062 Various Buildings Repaint Exterior of Buildings needing such action $250,000 $250,000


64 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace HVAC and Control Systems $250,000 $250,00065 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Roofs and Insulation and decking $250,000 $250,00066 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Carpet and tile and other floor coverings $250,000 $250,000


68 Various Buildings Address structural and foundation issues identified $250,000 $250,00069 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade water proofing systems $250,000 $250,00070 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade CBD/SBD Pavers and Irrigations systems $250,000 $250,00071 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade Generators and Fuel Systems $250,000 $250,00072 Various Buildings Repaint Exterior of Buildings need such action $250,000 $250,000


74 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Energy/HVAC and Control Systems $250,000 $250,00075 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Roofs and Insulation and decking $250,000 $250,00076 Various Buildings Upgrade and Replace Carpet and tile and other floor coverings $250,000 $250,000


78 Various Buildings Address structural and foundation issues identified $250,000 $250,00079 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade water proofing systems $250,000 $250,00080 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade CBD/SBD Pavers and Irrigations systems $250,000 $250,00081 Various Buildings Replace and upgrade Generators and Fuel Systems $250,000 $250,00082 Various Buildings Repaint Exterior of Buildings needing such action $250,000 $250,000

Total $30,835,971 $3,920,506 $3,563,200 $3,693,586 $3,416,420 $3,212,259 $3,223,200 $2,306,800 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000

25

Salt Lake City Impact Fee Schedule - with full parks impact fees

Impact Fee Calculation

FireResidential (per dwelling unit) 119$ Nonresidential (per square foot) 0.32$

PoliceResidential (per dwelling unit) 41$ Nonresidential (per square foot) 0.03$

ParksResidential (total dwelling units) 4,180$ Nonresidential (per square foot) -$

RoadwaysResidential (per dwelling unit) Single Family 424$ Multi Family 249$ Commercial (per square foot) Retail 3.28$ Office 2.33$ Industrial 2.26$

TOTAL FEESResidential (per dwelling unit) Single Family 4,764$ Multi Family 4,590$ Commercial (per square foot) Retail 3.63$ Office 2.68$ Industrial 2.61$

Current FeesResidential (per dwelling unit) Single Family 1,618$ Multi Family 1,618$ Commercial (per square foot) Retail 9.24$ Office 4.82$ Industrial 2.62$

REVISED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN EXHIBITS

Selected Exhibits reflecting modified parks impact fee

27

Salt Lake City - Sources and UsesCapital Improvement Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained Assuming Reduced Parks Impact Fees

SOURCES FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year totals

On-Going General Fund Contribution - 7% 13,543,847$ 13,723,562$ 14,135,269$ 14,559,327$ 14,996,107$ 15,445,990$ 15,909,370$ 16,386,651$ 16,878,250$ 17,384,598$ 152,962,971$ Ongoing General Fund Revenues 13,543,847$ 13,723,562$ 14,135,269$ 14,559,327$ 14,996,107$ 15,445,990$ 15,909,370$ 16,386,651$ 16,878,250$ 17,384,598$ 152,962,971$

Impact Fees (including current fund balances) 3,420,000$ 7,377,811$ 3,794,611$ 3,524,611$ 1,589,211$ 2,256,511$ 2,376,511$ 5,142,111$ 2,509,111$ 2,231,111$ 34,221,600$ Open Space Bond Fund Balance -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 600,000$ 2,100,000$ Class C CIP Funds 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 2,400,000$ 24,000,000$ CDBG CIP Funds 1,304,175$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 11,204,175$ Facilities - Fleet Bond Revenue -$ 1,264,291$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,264,291$ Grants for Shared Use Pathways -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Streets Viaduct Match-already in CIP account -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ Federal Grant - FHWA -$ 9,320,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,320,000$ Sale of Public Safety/Evidence Property 6,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 11,000,000$

Total General Fund Revenues 20,668,022$ 36,135,664$ 28,179,880$ 27,183,938$ 20,085,318$ 21,202,501$ 21,785,881$ 25,278,762$ 22,887,361$ 23,115,709$ 246,523,037$

USES FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year totalsDebt Service

Sales Tax Bonds 3,757,013$ 4,161,854$ 4,401,174$ 2,930,705$ 6,864,511$ 9,354,071$ 9,342,669$ 9,333,578$ 9,332,520$ 9,337,671$ 68,815,766$ CAM Bond Issuance - estimated/placeholder Parking Pay Stations 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ 665,780$ -$ -$ 4,660,460$ Streetcar 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 2,250,000$ Pay Station Test 291,777$ 291,777$ UPAC BAN 262,000$ 262,000$ 524,000$ Remainder of CAM Bond Issuance Placeholder 2,408,223$ 1,322,220$ 1,322,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 1,584,220$ 2,250,000$ 2,250,000$ 17,473,763$

Ongoing Debt Service 6,457,013$ 6,661,854$ 6,901,174$ 5,430,705$ 9,364,511$ 11,854,071$ 11,842,669$ 11,833,578$ 11,832,520$ 11,837,671$ 94,015,766$

Capital ProjectsFire -$ 550,000$ $1,000,000 6,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$ 2,000,000$ 1,550,000$ 13,600,000$ Police -$ 5,000,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$ Parks and Open Space 2,159,174$ 5,077,071$ 6,403,611$ 6,996,811$ 4,146,811$ 4,221,811$ 4,546,811$ 3,846,811$ 4,946,811$ 3,196,811$ 45,542,535$ Streets 8,981,709$ 14,888,300$ 5,753,850$ 4,980,229$ 4,797,029$ 3,741,479$ 4,468,379$ 5,912,729$ 3,109,729$ 4,706,570$ 61,340,000$ Transportation 1,190,000$ 2,785,000$ 2,965,000$ 2,615,000$ 345,000$ 510,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 320,000$ 480,000$ 12,010,000$ Facilities - ongoing 490,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 390,000$ 4,000,000$ Facilities - discretionary 1,227,539$ 623,439$ 606,245$ 611,193$ 837,367$ 325,140$ 58,022$ 155,644$ 128,302$ 794,657$ 5,367,549$ CIP/Impact Fee Update -$ -$ -$ -$ 44,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 44,600$ Percent for Art 130,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,030,000$ Overruns 32,587$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 572,587$

Ongoing General Fund Expenditures 14,211,009$ 29,473,810$ 21,278,706$ 21,753,233$ 10,720,807$ 9,348,430$ 9,943,212$ 13,445,184$ 11,054,842$ 11,278,038$ 152,507,271$

Total General Fund Capital Expenditures 20,668,022$ 36,135,664$ 28,179,880$ 27,183,938$ 20,085,318$ 21,202,501$ 21,785,881$ 25,278,762$ 22,887,362$ 23,115,709$ 246,523,037$

difference (0)$ 0$ (0)$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ (0)$ 0$ (1)$

Salt Lake City Parks DivisionCapital Improvement Plan 2012-2021 - Fiscally Constrained

Acres/ Estimated ApprovedType of Capital Facility Miles Cost FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 10 year total

Parks/Open Space Acquisition and Development Additional acres of developed parks to continue current level of service for growth 44.58 9,458,000$ -$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 1,050,889$ 9,458,000$ Additional acres of open space to continue current level of service for growth 54.30 543,000$ -$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 60,333$ 543,000$ Additional non growth-related open space acquisition TBD 2,100,000$ -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,100,000$

Trail/Shared Use Pathway DevelopmentJordan and Salt Lake (McClelland) Canal Shared Use Pathway 4,000,000$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ 4,000,000$ City Creek Trail 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$

Improvements to Existing Parks - Specific projects to be determined on an annual basis Includes playgrounds, restrooms, fields, courts, paths, pavilions, plazas, off-leash dog parksskate parks, BMX/bike parks, irrigation and landscaping, and other miscellaneous improvements

Playground Improvements 1,816,200$ 116,200$ 150,000$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 193,750$ 1,816,200$

Restroom Improvements 3,000,000$ 25,000$ 275,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 325,000$ 375,000$ 125,000$ 3,000,000$

Multipurpose Field Improvements 950,000$ -$ -$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 118,750$ 950,000$

Basketball Improvements 150,000$ -$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 16,667$ 150,000$

Tennis Court Improvements 4,613,400$ 130,500$ 457,900$ 875,000$ 1,400,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 350,000$ 4,613,400$

Volleyball Court Improvements 70,000$ -$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 70,000$

Softball Field Improvements 400,000$ -$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 44,444$ 400,000$

Baseball Field Improvements 1,400,000$ -$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 155,556$ 1,400,000$

Jogging/Walking Path Improvements 501,608$ 410,608$ 91,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 501,608$

Pavilion Improvements 1,200,000$ -$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 1,200,000$

Plaza Improvements 1,200,000$ -$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 133,333$ 1,200,000$

Off-Leash Dog Park Improvements 500,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 35,714$ 500,000$

Skate Park Improvements 700,000$ -$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 77,778$ 700,000$

BMX/Bike Park Improvements 300,000$ -$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 33,333$ 300,000$

Miscellaneous AmenitiesDrinking Fountains 70,000$ -$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 7,778$ 70,000$ Picnic Tables 240,000$ -$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 26,667$ 240,000$ Horseshoes 15,000$ -$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 1,667$ 15,000$ Water Features 250,000$ -$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 27,778$ 250,000$ Bridges 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Bleachers 112,000$ -$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 12,444$ 112,000$ Benches 90,000$ -$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 90,000$ Earthen Trails 375,223$ 150,223$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 375,223$ Concessions 500,000$ -$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 55,556$ 500,000$

Other ImprovementsLandscaping 2,305,000$ -$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 256,111$ 2,305,000$ Lighting 694,770$ 102,710$ 232,060$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 694,770$ Irrigation 2,394,220$ 616,820$ -$ 500,000$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 182,486$ 2,394,220$ Fencing 350,000$ -$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 38,889$ 350,000$ Asphalt 1,182,020$ 295,020$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 98,556$ 1,182,020$ Signage 312,093$ 312,093$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 312,093$

Cemetery 2,000,000$ -$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 222,222$ 2,000,000$

Total Improvements to Existing Parks 27,941,534$ 2,159,174$ 2,590,849$ 3,992,389$ 3,735,589$ 3,035,589$ 3,035,589$ 2,685,589$ 2,285,589$ 2,335,589$ 2,085,589$ 27,941,534$

Percent for Art 500,000$ 65,000$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 48,333$ 500,000$

Cost Overruns 300,000$ 16,294$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 31,523$ 300,000$

Total Infrastructure 46,042,534$ 2,240,468$ 5,031,927$ 6,433,467$ 7,026,667$ 4,226,667$ 4,226,667$ 4,626,667$ 3,926,667$ 5,026,667$ 3,276,667$ 46,042,534$

Plus Cost of CIP/Fee-Related Research

Impact Fee Study 11,150$ $11,150 11,150$ Parks Recovery Plan 50,000$ $50,000 50,000$ Parks, Open Space and Trails Master Plan 75,000$ $75,000 75,000$ Jordan River Master Plan 100,000$ $50,000 $50,000 100,000$ Foothills Recreation and Management Plan 75,000$ $75,000 75,000$

Total Infrastructure Plus CIP/Fee-Related Research 46,353,684$ 2,240,468$ 5,156,927$ 6,483,467$ 7,076,667$ 4,237,817$ 4,301,667$ 4,626,667$ 3,926,667$ 5,026,667$ 3,276,667$ 46,353,684$

Minus Impact Fee Balance 1,184,928$ $1,184,928 1,184,928$

Grand Total 45,168,756$ 2,240,468$ 3,971,999$ 6,483,467$ 7,076,667$ 4,237,817$ 4,301,667$ 4,626,667$ 3,926,667$ 5,026,667$ 3,276,667$ $45,168,756

29

Salt Lake City Impact Fee Schedule - with reduced parks impact fees

Impact Fee Calculation

FireResidential (per dwelling unit) 119$ Nonresidential (per square foot) 0.32$

PoliceResidential (per dwelling unit) 41$ Nonresidential (per square foot) 0.03$

ParksResidential (total dwelling units) 2,565$ Nonresidential (per square foot) -$

RoadwaysResidential (per dwelling unit) Single Family 424$ Multi Family 249$ Commercial (per square foot) Retail 3.28$ Office 2.33$ Industrial 2.26$

TOTAL FEESResidential (per dwelling unit) Single Family 3,148$ Multi Family 2,974$ Commercial (per square foot) Retail 3.63$ Office 2.68$ Industrial 2.61$

Current FeesResidential (per dwelling unit) Single Family 1,618$ Multi Family 1,618$ Commercial (per square foot) Retail 9.24$ Office 4.82$ Industrial 2.62$

1 – Galena Consulting, 2011

To: LuAnn Clark and Michael Akerlow, Salt Lake City HAND

From: Anne Wescott, Galena Consulting

Date: March 19, 2012

Re: Impact Fee Comparisons

One of the tasks within our scope of work for the update of the City’s Impact Fee Program

was a comparison of fees to other jurisdictions.

In the following data you will see that we have compared Salt Lake City’s current impact

fees for roads, parks, police and fire to:

Salt Lake City’s preliminary updated impact fees for roads, parks, police and fire;

The national average of impact fees for roads, parks, police and fire;

The average impact fees of 143 cities in ten Western States;

The average impact fees of the capital cities of six Western States;

The average impact fees of seven other cities with a comparable population of

150,000 to 250,000;

The average impact fees of three other Western cities that have a central position in a

Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) of the same size as the Salt Lake MSA; and

The average impact fees of 14 Utah cities that are comparable to Salt Lake City in

population and/or are geographically close to Salt Lake City.


single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf

Salt Lake City - current -$ -$ 8.62$ 4.20$ 2.00$ Salt Lake City - draft update 450$ 264$ 2.91$ 2.07$ 2.01$

National Average Sample Size - 268 3,227$ 2,179$ 5.95$ 3.36$ 2.06$

Western States 1 Sample Size

Arizona 30 2,630$ 1,818$ 4.40$ 2.11$ 1.15$ California 37 6,499$ 4,322$ 10.06$ 6.76$ 3.96$ Colorado 17 2,691$ 1,897$ 11.51$ 3.14$ 1.93$ Idaho 1 3,456$ 1,950$ 8.86$ 9.28$ 2.13$ Montana 1 3,432$ 2,124$ 5.93$ 1.96$ 1.46$ New Mexico 8 2,932$ 1,815$ 3.80$ 3.18$ 2.32$ Nevada 5 2,151$ 1,676$ 3.21$ 1.94$ 1.48$ Oregon 11 3,573$ 2,482$ 7.90$ 4.23$ 2.88$ Utah 18 1,140$ 1,073$ 2.03$ 1.04$ 0.63$ Washington 15 1,889$ 1,198$ 4.72$ 3.26$ 2.15$

average 3,039$ 2,036$ 6.24$ 3.69$ 2.01$

Western Capital Cities Population

Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 650$ 449$ 0.99$ 0.68$ 0.41$ Sacramento CA 486,189 4,651$ 3,851$ 7.01$ 6.55$ 2.16$ Boise ID 211,720 3,456$ 1,950$ 8.86$ 9.28$ 2.13$ Santa Fe NM 75,764 2,100$ 1,554$ 4.60$ 2.42$ 1.61$ Salem OR 156,690 1,953$ 1,274$ 8.14$ 2.09$ 1.32$ Olympia WA 42,514 3,015$ 1,957$ 4.84$ 6.46$ 3.74$

average 2,638$ 1,839$ 5.74$ 4.58$ 1.90$

Similarly Sized-Cities 2

Chandler AZ 247,140 3,983$ 2,446$ 7.39$ 5.88$ 1.66$ Gilbert AZ 216,449 423$ 297$ 1.59$ 0.57$ 0.41$ Glendale AZ 251,522 1,160$ 591$ 4.13$ 2.17$ 1.23$ Boise ID 211,720 3,535$ 1,950$ 8.86$ 9.28$ 2.13$ Reno NV 218,000 4,177$ 2,845$ 7.61$ 4.00$ 2.53$ Salem OR 156,690 1,953$ 1,274$ 8.14$ 2.09$ 1.32$ Spokane WA 208,916 638$ 412$ 2.65$ 1.71$ 0.68$

average 2,267$ 1,402$ 5.77$ 3.67$ 1.42$

Primary cities in similary-sized MSAs 3

Tucson AZ 541,811 4,300$ 2,150$ 4.28$ 5.09$ 2.20$ Fresno CA 495,913 per acre per acre per acre per acre per acreAlbuquerque NM 528,497 3,662$ 1,520$ 3.61$ 3.42$ 3.35$

average 3,981$ 1,835$ 3.95$ 4.26$ 2.78$

Utah Cities 4 5

Draper UT 42,274 1,447$ 994$ 4.85$ 1.93 1.05$ Herriman UT 21,785 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Layton UT 67,311 2,399$ 1,508$ 3.73$ 2.19$ 2.55$ Lehi UT 47,407 1,513$ 1,513$ 1.04$ 1.04$ 0.21$ Logan UT 48,174 669$ 461$ 0.30$ 0.14$ 0.05$ Park City UT 7,558 315$ 290$ 0.41$ 0.41$ 0.32$ Provo UT 112,488 986$ 657$ 2.40$ 0.61$ 0.40$ Riverton UT 38,753 764$ 2,675$ 3.20$ 1.60$ 0.67$ St George UT 72,897 754$ 754$ unavailable unavailable unavailableSandy UT 87,461 986$ -$ -$ -$ -$ South Jordan UT 50,418 1,880$ 1,316$ 4.74$ 2.94$ 1.31$ Tooele UT 31,605 1,515$ -$ -$ -$ -$ West Jordan UT 103,712 1,891$ 4,340$ 4.34$ 1.47$ 0.77$ West Valley UT 129,480 846$ 514$ 1.34$ 1.25$ 0.81$

average 1,140$ 1,073$ 2.03$ 1.04$ 0.63$

Roads Impact Fees


single family multi family

Salt Lake City - current 681$ 681$ Salt Lake City - draft update 1,752$ 1,752$

National Average Sample Size - 268 2,955$ 2,254$


Arizona 30 2,385$ 1,801$ California 37 8,622$ 6,681$ Colorado 17 3,560$ 2,774$ Idaho 1 1,355$ 1,050$ Montana 1 738$ 738$ New Mexico 8 1,747$ 1,261$ Nevada 5 2,034$ 1,625$ Oregon 11 5,095$ 3,817$ Utah 18 2,781$ 1,811$ Washington 15 2,244$ 1,506$

average 3,056$ 2,306$


Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 4,018$ 1,876$ Sacramento CA 486,189 5,191$ 3,058$ Boise ID 211,720 1,355$ 1,050$ Santa Fe NM 75,764 1,214$ 971$ Salem OR 156,690 3,548$ 1,937$ Olympia WA 42,514 2,930$ 1,771$

average 3,043$ 1,777$


Chandler AZ 247,140 5,057$ 3,873$ Gilbert AZ 216,449 4,547$ 3,911$ Glendale AZ 251,522 2,072$ 1,555$ Boise ID 211,720 1,355$ 1,050$ Reno NV 218,000 1,000$ 1,000$ Salem OR 156,690 3,548$ 1,937$ Spokane WA 208,916 -$ -$

average 2,511$ 1,904$


Tucson AZ 541,811 1,720$ 860$ Fresno CA 495,913 3,398$ 2,764$ Albuquerque NM 528,497 3,990$ 2,463$

average 3,036$ 2,029$

Utah Cities 4 5

Draper UT 42,274 3,990$ 2,463$ Herriman UT 21,785 3,445$ 3,445$ Layton UT 67,311 1,873$ 1,381$ Lehi UT 47,407 3,819$ 3,198$ Logan UT 48,174 -$ -$ Park City UT 7,558 3,855$ 3,150$ Provo UT 112,488 3,088$ 2,391$ Riverton UT 38,753 2,675$ 469$ St George UT 72,897 2,730$ 2,730$ Sandy UT 87,461 3,316$ 1,841$ South Jordan UT 50,418 4,346$ 2,850$ Tooele UT 31,605 2,125$ -$ West Jordan UT 103,712 1,633$ -$ West Valley UT 129,480 2,032$ 1,429$

average 2,781$ 1,811$

Parks Impact Fees



Salt Lake City - current 452$ 452$ 0.30$ 0.30$ 0.30$ Salt Lake City - draft update 357$ 357$ 0.24$ 0.24$ 0.24$

National Average Sample Size - 268 385$ 303$ 4.30$ 0.26$ 0.18$


Arizona 30 467$ 368$ 0.59$ 0.28$ 0.20$ California 37 802$ 635$ 0.68$ 0.52$ 0.40$ Colorado 17 356$ 325$ 0.28$ 0.26$ 0.15$ Idaho 1 628$ 628$ -$ 0.08$ 0.08$ Montana 1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ New Mexico 8 231$ 123$ 0.21$ 0.06$ 0.06$ Nevada 5 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Oregon 11 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Utah 18 181$ 152$ 0.12$ 0.11$ 0.10$ Washington 15 161$ 134$ 0.79$ 0.11$ 0.11$

average 283$ 236$ 0.27$ 0.14$ 0.11$


Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 344$ 153$ 19.00$ 0.20$ 0.22$ Sacramento CA 486,189 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Boise ID 211,720 628$ 628$ -$ 0.08$ 0.08$ Santa Fe NM 75,764 48$ 39$ -$ 0.04$ 0.03$ Salem OR 156,690 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Olympia WA 42,514 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

average 170$ 137$ 3.17$ 0.05$ 0.06$


Chandler AZ 247,140 268$ 221$ 0.37$ 0.28$ 0.09$ Gilbert AZ 216,449 643$ 643$ 0.34$ 0.34$ 0.34$ Glendale AZ 251,522 395$ 297$ 0.58$ 0.30$ 0.17$ Boise ID 211,720 628$ 628$ 0.08$ 0.08$ Reno NV 218,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Salem OR 156,690 -$ -$ -$ -$ Spokane WA 208,916 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

average 276$ 256$ 0.26$ 0.14$ 0.10$


Tucson AZ 541,811 674$ 499$ 0.70$ 0.70$ 0.70$ Fresno CA 495,913 624$ 508$ 6.65$ 6.65$ 4.22$ Albuquerque NM 528,497 218$ 71$ 0.34$ 0.08$ 0.08$

average 505$ 359$ 2.56$ 2.48$ 1.67$

Utah Cities 4 5

Draper UT 42,274 218$ 71$ 0.27$ 0.11 0.04$ Herriman UT 21,785 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Layton UT 67,311 -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.07$ Lehi UT 47,407 340$ 340$ 0.07$ 0.07$ 0.07$ Logan UT 48,174 34$ 28$ 0.03$ 0.03$ 0.01$ Park City UT 7,558 605$ 495$ 0.56$ 0.56$ 0.45$ Provo UT 112,488 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Riverton UT 38,753 308$ 308$ 0.09$ 0.02$ 0.31$ St George UT 72,897 109$ 109$ 0.10$ 0.07$ 0.01$ Sandy UT 87,461 71$ 40$ -$ 0.21$ 0.06$ South Jordan UT 50,418 323$ 208$ -$ -$ -$ Tooele UT 31,605 350$ 320$ 0.32$ 0.32$ 0.32$ West Jordan UT 103,712 105$ 160$ 0.14$ 0.08$ 0.05$ West Valley UT 129,480 66$ 45$ 0.11$ 0.08$ 0.04$

average 181$ 152$ 0.12$ 0.11$ 0.10$

Police Impact Fees



Salt Lake City - current 485$ 485$ 0.32$ 0.32$ 0.32$ Salt Lake City - draft update 218$ 218$ 0.39$ 0.39$ 0.39$

National Average Sample Size - 268 512$ 381$ 4.19$ 0.38$ 0.26$


Arizona 30 634$ 511$ 0.46$ 0.53$ 0.36$ California 37 1,022$ 690$ 0.58$ 0.61$ 0.36$ Colorado 17 644$ 407$ 0.33$ 0.35$ 0.25$ Idaho 1 479$ 479$ -$ 0.25$ 0.25$ Montana 1 823$ 692$ 0.19$ 0.19$ 0.19$ New Mexico 8 477$ 308$ 0.57$ 0.37$ 0.36$ Nevada 5 1,780$ 1,180$ 0.80$ 0.14$ 0.57$ Oregon 11 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Utah 18 159$ 119$ 0.16$ 0.14$ 0.05$ Washington 15 634$ 670$ 0.38$ 0.26$ 0.26$

average 665$ 506$ 0.35$ 0.28$ 0.26$


Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 322$ 270$ 0.10$ 0.12$ 0.17$ Sacramento CA 486,189 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Boise ID 211,720 479$ 479$ -$ 0.25$ 0.25$ Santa Fe NM 75,764 136$ 110$ -$ 0.12$ 0.07$ Salem OR 156,690 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Olympia WA 42,514 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

average 156$ 143$ 0.02$ 0.08$ 0.08$


Chandler AZ 247,140 577$ 442$ 0.72$ 0.55$ 0.18$ Gilbert AZ 216,449 1,100$ 1,100$ 0.59$ 0.59$ 0.59$ Glendale AZ 251,522 409$ 307$ 0.30$ 0.45$ 0.28$ Boise ID 211,720 479$ 479$ -$ 0.25$ 0.25$ Reno NV 218,000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Salem OR 156,690 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Spokane WA 208,916 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

average 366$ 333$ 0.23$ 0.26$ 0.19$


Tucson AZ 541,811 488$ 360$ 0.27$ 0.27$ 0.27$ Fresno CA 495,913 539$ 439$ 2.36$ 2.36$ 1.50$ Albuquerque NM 528,497 310$ 107$ -$ -$ -$

average 446$ 302$ 0.88$ 0.88$ 0.59$

Utah Cities 4 5

Draper UT 42,274 310$ 107$ 0.41$ 0.54$ 0.04$ Herriman UT 21,785 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Layton UT 67,311 501$ 391$ 0.65$ 0.47$ -$ Lehi UT 47,407 576$ 576$ 0.25$ 0.25$ 0.25$ Logan UT 48,174 118$ 85$ 0.09$ 0.10$ 0.02$ Park City UT 7,558 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Provo UT 112,488 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Riverton UT 38,753 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ St George UT 72,897 216$ 216$ 0.18$ 0.19$ 0.06$ Sandy UT 87,461 165$ 92$ 0.32$ 0.09$ 0.13$ South Jordan UT 50,418 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Tooele UT 31,605 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ West Jordan UT 103,712 247$ 140$ 0.16$ 0.20$ 0.13$ West Valley UT 129,480 91$ 62$ 0.16$ 0.11$ 0.05$

average 159$ 119$ 0.16$ 0.14$ 0.05$

Fire Impact Fees



Salt Lake City - current 1,618$ 1,618$ 9.24$ 4.82$ 2.62$ Salt Lake City - draft update 2,777$ 2,591$ 3.54$ 2.70$ 2.64$

National Average Sample Size - 268 7,079$ 5,617$ 6.29$ 4.04 2.69$


Arizona 30 6,116$ 4,640$ 5.22$ 3.08$ 1.89$ California 37 16,945$ 15,496$ 13.96$ 10.43$ 7.40$ Colorado 17 7,251$ 4,759$ 12.54$ 5.86$ 3.07$ Idaho 1 5,918$ 4,107$ 8.86$ 9.61$ 2.46$ Montana 1 4,993$ 2,816$ 6.12$ 2.15$ 1.65$ New Mexico 8 5,387$ 2,772$ 4.40$ 3.46$ 2.97$ Nevada 5 5,965$ 3,735$ 2.65$ 1.79$ 1.30$ Oregon 11 8,668$ 6,141$ 7.82$ 4.50$ 3.17$ Utah 18 4,061$ 3,154$ 2.05 1.22 0.73 Washington 15 4,928$ 4,120$ 4.57$ 3.19$ 2.29$

average 7,023$ 5,174$ 6.82$ 4.53$ 2.69$


Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 5,334$ 2,748$ 20.09$ 1.00$ 0.80$ Sacramento CA 486,189 9,842$ 6,909$ 7.01$ 6.55$ 2.16$ Boise ID 211,720 5,918$ 4,107$ 8.86$ 9.61$ 2.46$ Santa Fe NM 75,764 3,498$ 2,674$ 4.60$ 2.58$ 1.71$ Salem OR 156,690 5,501$ 3,211$ 8.14$ 2.09$ 1.32$ Olympia WA 42,514 5,945$ 3,728$ 4.84$ 6.46$ 3.74$

average 6,006$ 3,896$ 8.92$ 4.72$ 2.03$


Chandler AZ 247,140 9,885$ 6,982$ 8.48$ 6.71$ 1.93$ Gilbert AZ 216,449 6,713$ 5,951$ 2.52$ 1.50$ 1.34$ Glendale AZ 251,522 4,036$ 2,750$ 5.01$ 2.92$ 1.68$ Boise ID 211,720 5,997$ 4,107$ 8.86$ 9.61$ 2.46$ Reno NV 218,000 5,501$ 3,845$ 7.61$ 4.00$ 2.53$ Salem OR 156,690 5,501$ 3,211$ 8.14$ 2.09$ 1.32$ Spokane WA 208,916 638$ 412$ 2.65$ 1.71$ 0.68$

average 5,467$ 3,894$ 6.18$ 4.08$ 1.71$


Tucson AZ 541,811 7,182$ 3,869$ 5.25$ 6.06$ 3.17$ Fresno CA 495,913 4,561$ 3,711$ 9.01$ 9.01$ 5.72$ Albuquerque NM 528,497 8,180$ 4,161$ 3.95$ 3.50$ 3.43$

average 6,641$ 3,914$ 6.07$ 6.19$ 4.11$

Utah Cities 4 5

Draper UT 42,274 5,965$ 3,635$ 3.95$ 2.58$ 1.13$ Herriman UT 21,785 3,445$ 3,445$ -$ -$ -$ Layton UT 67,311 4,773$ 3,280$ 4.38$ 2.66$ 2.62$ Lehi UT 47,407 6,248$ 5,627$ 1.36$ 1.36$ 0.53$ Logan UT 48,174 821$ 574$ 0.42$ 0.27$ 0.08$ Park City UT 7,558 4,775$ 3,935$ 0.97$ 0.97$ 0.77$ Provo UT 112,488 4,074$ 3,048$ 2.40$ 0.61$ 0.40$ Riverton UT 38,753 3,747$ 3,452$ 3.29$ 1.62$ 0.98$ St George UT 72,897 3,809$ 3,809$ 0.28$ 0.26$ 0.07$ Sandy UT 87,461 4,538$ 1,973$ 0.32$ 0.30$ 0.19$ South Jordan UT 50,418 6,549$ 4,374$ 4.74$ 2.94$ 1.31$ Tooele UT 31,605 3,990$ 320$ 0.32$ 0.32$ 0.32$ West Jordan UT 103,712 1,089$ 4,640$ 4.64$ 1.75$ 0.95$ West Valley UT 129,480 3,035$ 2,050$ 1.61$ 1.44$ 0.90$

average 4,061$ 3,154$ 2.05$ 1.22$ 0.73$

Total Impact Fees (roads, parks, police and fire)


single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf single family multi family single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf

Salt Lake City - current -$ -$ 8.62$ 4.20$ 2.00$ 681$ 681$ 452$ 452$ 0.30$ 0.30$ 0.30$ 485$ 485$ 0.32$ 0.32$ 0.32$ 1,618$ 1,618$ 9.24$ 4.82$ 2.62$ Salt Lake City - draft update 450$ 264$ 2.91$ 2.07$ 2.01$ 1,752$ 1,752$ 357$ 357$ 0.24$ 0.24$ 0.24$ 218$ 218$ 0.39$ 0.39$ 0.39$ 2,777$ 2,591$ 3.54$ 2.70$ 2.64$

National Average 3,227$ 2,179$ 5.95$ 3.36$ 2.06$ 2,955$ 2,254$ 385$ 303$ 4.30$ 0.26$ 0.18$ 512$ 381$ 4.19$ 0.38$ 0.26$ 7,079$ 5,617$ 6.29$ 4.04 2.69$

Western States 1 3,039$ 2,036$ 6.24$ 3.69$ 2.01$ 3,056$ 2,306$ 283$ 236$ 0.27$ 0.14$ 0.11$ 665$ 506$ 0.35$ 0.28$ 0.26$ 7,023$ 5,174$ 6.82$ 4.53$ 2.69$

Western Capital Cities 2,638$ 1,839$ 5.74$ 4.58$ 1.90$ 3,043$ 1,777$ 170$ 137$ 3.17$ 0.05$ 0.06$ 156$ 143$ 0.02$ 0.08$ 0.08$ 6,006$ 3,896$ 8.92$ 4.72$ 2.03$

Similarly Sized-Cities 2 2,267$ 1,402$ 5.77$ 3.67$ 1.42$ 2,511$ 1,904$ 276$ 256$ 0.26$ 0.14$ 0.10$ 366$ 333$ 0.23$ 0.26$ 0.19$ 5,467$ 3,894$ 6.18$ 4.08$ 1.71$

Primary cities in similary-sized MSAs 3 3,981$ 1,835$ 3.95$ 4.26$ 2.78$ 3,036$ 2,029$ 505$ 359$ 2.56$ 2.48$ 1.67$ 446$ 302$ 0.88$ 0.88$ 0.59$ 6,641$ 3,914$ 6.07$ 6.19$ 4.11$

Utah Cities 4 5 1,140$ 1,073$ 2.03$ 1.04$ 0.63$ 2,781$ 1,811$ 181$ 152$ 0.12$ 0.11$ 0.10$ 159$ 119$ 0.16$ 0.14$ 0.05$ 4,061$ 3,154$ 2.05$ 1.22$ 0.73$

Total Impact Fees (roads, parks, police and fire) Roads Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Police Impact Fees Fire Impact Fees

Source: Galena Consulting Study Team; 2010 National Impact Fee Survey, Duncan Associates

Notes:1) State Average determined by 2010 National Impact Fee Survey, based on non-exhaustive sample of published fees. Average adjusted with the addition of other cities researched by Galena Consulting. Averages include cities that may not be comparable to Salt Lake City in size or circumstances.2) Between 150,000 and 250,000 population3) Approx. 1M population4) Utah cities of similar size, and/or geographic proximity to Salt Lake City5) Bountiful and Murray do not assess General Fund impact fees6) Information could not be obtained for Ogden and Orem, but Ogden is believed to have fees


Conclusions

Impact fees are calculated based on a set of variables that differ significantly from city to city.

As such, there is no “right amount” for an impact fee. We focus instead on ensuring that the

impact fee has been calculated properly according to the guidelines set forth in statute and

relative to the specific circumstances of the jurisdiction assessing the fee.

The data provided above can be useful as a casual comparison of fees between similar entities.

If city representatives are concerned that impact fees might affect their ability to compete for

desired development, it can be helpful to review the fees of neighboring jurisdictions as well as

those considered to be competing markets.

There are challenges inherent in making definitive conclusions about the appropriate level of an

impact fee based on these comparisons, however:

• The list of cities included in the comparison is not exhaustive, nor is it statistically

sampled. While attempts were made to include a variety of different comparisons, some

cities may have been included that may not be considered by the City to be comparable,

and some may have been omitted that are.

• Some cities have complex impact fee schedules, assigning specific fee levels for each

land use type, and/or different service areas. In order to include fee data from these

cities, estimations were made in order to aggregate the data.

• Impact fee statutes change from state to state. Some states may allow impact fees to

fund capital items that others do not, which may affect the level of the impact fee. Many

jurisdictions used in this comparison have impact fees in categories other than roads,

parks, police and fire (i.e., government buildings, schools, arts and culture facilities,

etc.). The total impact fee on a unit of development in these cases would be higher than

is shown in this comparison.

• Impact fees are based on continuing the current level of service. Every city has a

different level of service (i.e., faster or slower fire response, more or less police officers,

more or less park acres, better or worse roadway congestion), which affects the level of

the impact fee.


• Some jurisdictions address the cost of growth in ways other than impact fees. For

example, instead of assessing impact fees, a city may choose to exact the improvement

as a condition of development approval, or to subsidize the cost of growth from other

revenue sources such as General Funds.

• Growth patterns are different. For example, some cities are experiencing more infill

growth, which can be less capital-intensive, while other cities are experiencing growth in

annexed and/or previously undeveloped areas that will require a great deal of capital

investment. The degree of capital required to meet the demands of growth will differ,

and will affect the level of the impact fee.

When evaluating comparisons to proposed impact fees, the following questions may be most

useful as part of a comprehensive policy discussion:

1. Has the impact fee been calculated in compliance with State statute?

2. Has the impact fee been calculated based on reasonable growth projections?

3. Has the impact fee been calculated based on reasonable capital costs for providing the

capital necessary to continue the current level of service as the population grows?

4. Are the calculated impact fees significantly higher or lower than jurisdictions considered

comparable to Salt Lake City? If so, can these differences be explained?

5. What kind of development is the City hoping to attract?

6. Will the level of these impact fees be a significant factor in a developer’s decision to locate

in a location other than Salt Lake City?1

7. If the City is considering adopting a fee lower than what will fully recover the cost of

necessary capital infrastructure, can the City afford to fund the difference? Alternatively,

will it be acceptable to allow the level of service to decrease?

1 Business-location decisions are based on many factors other than government cost (e.g., demographics of customer base, access to skilled labor, quality of life for residents, transportation access/egress, suitability of retail/office/industrial space, prestige/status of mailing address etc.). If government cost is a factor, it also encompasses ongoing tax rates and the value perception of ongoing services received for taxes and fees.

cfp and impact fees - slcdocs.com · 2 o impact fee table – attachment 3 slc examples –...

Documents