ceramic membranes for reusepwntechnologies.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/shorne...amta/awwa © 4...
TRANSCRIPT
AMTA/AWWA © 1
Ceramic Membranes for ReuseHolly Shorney-Darby, J. Zheng, G. Galjaard
PWN Technologies, the Netherlands
AMTA/AWWA © 2
acknowledgements
• Clement, Tian, and Tan (2009)
• Dow, Murphy, Clement, and Duke; Water, (2013)
• Zheng, Shorney-Darby, and Galjaard (2015)
• Metawater
AMTA/AWWA © 3
objectives
• evaluate pre-treatment to optimize the performance
of ceramic membranes for reuse applications
– coagulation
– oxidation
– performance parameters:
• flux
• cleaning protocols
• treated water quality
• suitability for downstream RO
• identify benefits of ceramic membranes in reuse
applications
AMTA/AWWA © 4
background
Location Membrane Pre-treatment
Bedok, Singapore intermediate Pre-coag, pre-ozone
Asian client 4.3 sqft (0.4 m2) Pre-coag, pre-chlorination and
pre-ozone
Australia 269 sqft (25 m2) Pre-coag, pre-ozone
Current Australia pilot 269 sqft (25 m2) Pre-coag, pre-ozone
Medemblik, NL 4.3 sqft (0.4 m2) Pre-coag, pre-ozone
Metawater Reuse Plant 269 sqft (25 m2) Pre-coag, pre-ozone
AMTA/AWWA © 5
ceramic microfiltration
• Metawater ceramic microfiltration module
• total membrane filtration area 25 m2 (269 ft2)
• pore size of 0.1 μm
• 2000 filtration channels
AMTA/AWWA © 6
coagulation and ozone pre-treatment
(Bedok, Singapore)
• 12 month pilot
• two intermediate sized membranes in parallel
• TOC = 6 to 7 mg/L
• turbidity = 5 to 6 NTU
• temperature = 29 oC
• initial testing showed PACl better than ferric coagulant
• ozone dosed directly upstream of membrane
contact time unknown
Clement, Tian, and Tan (2009)
AMTA/AWWA © 7
coagulation and ozone pre-treatment
(Bedok, Singapore)
PACl Flux Ozone Fouling Rate
(mg/L) (gfd) (lmh) (mg/L) (psi/day) (kPa/day)
2 119 200 0 2.5 – 5.1 17 - 35
Clement, Tian, and Tan (2009)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
TM
P(K
pa
/da
y)
Days
FeCl3
PACL
AMTA/AWWA © 8
coagulation and ozone pre-treatment
(Bedok, Singapore)
PACl Flux Ozone Fouling Rate
(mg/L) (gfd) (lmh) (mg/L) (psi/day) (kPa/day)
2 119 200 0 2.5 – 5.1 17 - 35
2 - 6 119 200 2 - 6 0.07 - 0.1 0.5 - 0.7
Clement, Tian, and Tan (2009)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
TM
P(K
pa
/da
y)
Days
FeCl3
PACL
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Ozone Dose (mg/L)
TM
P I
ncre
ase (
kp
a/d
ay)
0 2 4 6
AMTA/AWWA © 9
Australian pilot - Melbourne
• secondary effluent
• target ozone residual > 0.8 mg/L
• contact time not stated, few seconds
• DOC = 10 to 15 mg/L
• 90 day CIP target
• PACl coagulant (3 mg as Al3+/L)
Dow, Murphy, Clement, and Duke; Water, (2013)
AMTA/AWWA © 10
TMP curves at different flux for coagulation with
ozone pretreatment at Australian pilot
Dow, Murphy, Clement, and Duke; Water, (2013)
108 gfd (182 lmh)
100 gfd (169 lmh)
87 gfd (147 lmh)
higher flux not possible due to equipment size limitations
TMP
(bar)(psi)
44
36
22
15
7
0
29
AMTA/AWWA © 11
Ozone and coagulation pre-treatment
at Australian pilot
Flux = 96 gfd (162 lmh)
PACl = 3 mg/L as Al3+
Ozone = 0.5 mg/L
Dow, Murphy, Clement, and Duke; Water, (2013)
TMP
(bar)(psi)
36
22
15
7
0
29
AMTA/AWWA © 12
Asian client
• pilot with small membrane –
4.3 sqft (0.4 m2)
• approx 8 weeks testing
• TOC = 14 mg/L
• turbidity = 3 NTU
• ozone contactor = 1 minute
• coagulation = 2 minutes
• total ozone contact time = 3 minutes
AMTA/AWWA © 13
in-line coagulation pretreatment
Asian client (from Zheng, Shorney-Darby, and Galjaard, 2015)
Coagulant Flux Ozone Fouling Rate
(mg/L as Al3+) (gfd) (lmh) (mg/L) (psi/day) (kPa/day)
Up to 7 59 100 0 0.07 0.5
Up to 7 119 200 0 1.3 9.3
TMP (10 °C)
(kPa)(psi)
36
29
22
15
7
0
AMTA/AWWA © 14
Asian client
(pilot results for pre-coagulation)
Parameter Units Value
Flux (maximum instantaneous) lmh189
BW interval min 32
EBW frequency days 1 per day
Coagulant dose mg/L 6 mg/L Al3+
Coagulant mixing min 2.9
CIP target invertavl days >30
AMTA/AWWA © 15
TMP under different pre-treatment conditions
Asian client (from internal PWNT report)
• 59 gfd (100 lmh) for direct
filtration
• 119 gfd (200 lmh) for In-
line coagulation and pre-
ozone alone
• 178 gfd (300 lmh) for
combined pre-ozone and
coagulation pretreatment
>10mg/L applied ozone
dose
TMP (10 °C)
(kPa)(psi)
36
29
22
15
7
0
AMTA/AWWA © 16
SDI of membrane permeate
Asian client (Zheng, Shorney-Darby, and Galjaard (2015))
chlorinated feed unchlorinated feed
AMTA/AWWA © 17
DOC fractions
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 20 40 60 80 100
OC
D s
ignal (a
.u.)
retention time (minute)
Humic substances
Biopolymers
Building blocks
Low MW acids
Low MW neutrals
AMTA/AWWA © 18
NOM change and removal with pre-ozone and coagulation
Asian client (Zheng, Shorney-Darby, and Galjaard (2015))
AMTA/AWWA © 19
TOC concentration Sachtocklar PACl (6 mg/L Al3+)
flux of 112 gfd (189 lmh) with chlorinated feed water
Asian client (PWNT, internal report, 2014)
AMTA/AWWA © 20
Ozone Influence on Membrane Performance
Current Pilot, Australia
-17.8 kPa/day 65.3 kPa/day 21.3 kPa/day
Fouling Rate: Fouling Rate:
AMTA/AWWA © 21
Medemblik, NL Pilot
• starting up now
• coagulation and ozone pre-treatment
– measure ozone demand and decay
• systematic water quality evaluation
– organic characterization LC-OCD
– metals
– general water quality
– biological quality
• bench-scale ion exchange pre-treatment
AMTA/AWWA © 22
full-scale treatment
• Metawater research – similar findings
– residual ozone control
– coagulant dose optimization
– residual ozone concentration
• full-scale system in Japan
– comparable flux
– CIP interval > year
– optimized coagulant dose and BW interval
AMTA/AWWA © 23
conclusions
Site Achieved flux Pre-treatment Other highlights
Bedok, Singapore 119 gfd (200 lmh) PACl + ozone Ozone greatly reduced fouling rate
Australian Pilot108 gfd (182 lmh)[higher flux possible]
PACl + ozone
Ozone > 0.8 mg/L residual on
membrane (>>90 day CIP interval);
PACl dose at 3 mg/L Al3+
ACC 178 gfd (300 lmh) PACl + ozoneLow SDI, but high ozone dose
needed (e.g., ~ 10 mg/L)
ACC 112 gfd (189 lmh) PAClOptimized dose at approx. 2 to 6
mg/L as Al3+
Medemblik, NL To be determined Coagulant, ion exchange, ozone Broader water quality evaluation
• Optimized pre-treatment, with coagulation and sometimes oxidation, can
yield sustainable and high flux with ceramic membranes
• More research needed on treated water quality
AMTA/AWWA © 24
conclusions
• ceramic membranes can perform well for secondary
effluent reuse applications
• coagulation necessary for fouling control
• PACl often used
• ozone can:
– increase sustainable flux
– reduce CIP frequency
– lower operating TMP
– provide disinfection and oxidation
– (but ozone demand is often high)
AMTA/AWWA © 25
questions