centre for integrated energy research dramatic principles and participatory energy scenario design:...

18
Centre for Integrated Energy Research DRAMATIC PRINCIPLES AND PARTICIPATORY ENERGY SCENARIO DESIGN: OBSERVATIONS FROM 14 EUROPEAN CITIES • Dr Paul Upham, University of Leeds • Dr Rita Klapper, Manchester Business School • Dr Sebastian Carney, Carbon Captured Ltd

Upload: branden-fletcher

Post on 17-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

DRAMATIC PRINCIPLES AND PARTICIPATORY ENERGY SCENARIO DESIGN: OBSERVATIONS

FROM 14 EUROPEAN CITIES

• Dr Paul Upham, University of Leeds• Dr Rita Klapper, Manchester Business School• Dr Sebastian Carney, Carbon Captured Ltd

Overview– Inductive research

approach– What makes for a good

scenario process? – The GRIP scenario process

(EU CO2 80/50 project)– Affective dimensions of

perception & learning– Principles of drama & myth– Recommendations

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Project context• INTERREG

project 2008-10• 21 European

metropolitan regions

• Multi-tier GHG emissions inventorisation

• Scenario generation with real-time feedback

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

What makes for a good participatory scenario process?

Masini and Vasquez (2000) – 6 principles: humility, flexibility, rigorous back-up (data support), a willingness for continuous redesign of scenarios, stakeholder participation and an ethical and critical attitude

We discuss two broad design principles:• access to feedback on the consequences of scenario

assumptions (we use GRIP)• a supportive narrative structure (we use dramatic conventions)

The research design/approach is descriptive, interpretative and also abductive (think CSI or Holmes…)

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Ham

burg

Rotte

rdam

Oslo Porto

Man

ches

ter

Napl

es

Stoc

khol

m

Stutt

gart

-100.0%

-90.0%

-80.0%

-70.0%

-60.0%

-50.0%

-40.0%

-30.0%

-20.0%

-10.0%

0.0%

Scenario 1Scenario 2Scenario 3

Perc

enta

ge R

educ

tion

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Hamburg

Glasgow

Rotterdam

Paris Oslo

MadridPorto

Helsinki

Mancheste

rTurin

Naples

Brusse

ls

Stockholm

Frankfurt

Stuttgart

Sacramento

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

BaselineScenario 1Scenario 2Scenario 3

Rotterdam's figures are higher than others due to the petroleum refinineries in the city

Tonn

es C

O2

Per C

apit

a

Bruner and narrative• People learn not only through reasoning but also through ‘stories’• Stories are simply sequences of ideas; they may or may not be ‘true’• In a previous paper we focused on the cognitive aspect of learning• Here we focus on parallels between the scenario process and output

& dramatic structure

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

http://johnnyholland.org/2011/10/storyboarding-ux-part-1-an-introduction/

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Technique of Drama (1863), Gustav Freytag

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Aristotle in Poetics

• Plot is most important feature of a drama and provides structure

• Aim for a tightly constructed cause-and-effect chain of actions• Characters should be plausible and consistent• Simple plots involve a “change of fortune” (catastrophe)• Complex plots have “reversal of intention” (peripeteia) and

“recognition” (anagnorisis) connected to a catastrophe• There may be haramatia – an inevitability about a downfall• Katharsis – an eventual renewal as a result of the process• Spectacle is the least important feature but nonetheless

present. Also melody and chorus.

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

Plot: GRIP embodies causes and effects, plausible relationships and is highly structured

Characters: the scenario participants debate the likely actions of the human agents in their scenarios and fix this with assumptions

Learning and recognition: the scenario participants go through a day of journeying, ascendance, descent and climax, as plausibilities and implausibilities are debated and decided on

• The need to avoid Catastrophe, achieve “reversal of intention” (peripeteia) and “recognition” (anagnorisis) frame the process

• Inevitable downfall (haramatia) and Katharsis ? Tbc…

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

MADRID

Centre for Integrated Energy Research STOCKHOLM

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

In case you thought we were totally barking…

One can imagine integrating a calculator such as GRIP with narrative-support software such as Plotbuilder

Centre for Integrated Energy Research

ConclusionsIn common with a few others, we have emphasised the value of a narrative perspective of scenario development, to support learning, sense-making and plausibility

Here, though, we are more explicit in seeking to show the relevance of an enduring model of ideal dramatic form and also other mythology-focused narrative analysis

We see value in the narrative approach for the analysis of scenario processes, scenario output and also as a consideration in scenario design, with scope for further integrating scientific and imaginative methods