Annual Review Form 2019

AFT Accredited Training courses

All submissions of this form should be word-processed.

This report form is available on-line via the AFT website www.aft.org.uk on the Training and Development Menu, Course Accreditation Submenu.

Please return this form electronically to Kathi Özmaya, Accreditations Administrative Officer for CRED.Email: office@aft.org.uk by 30th January 20

To the best of my knowledge, all details submitted in this form represent the status of the course at the present time.

Name of Course Director:

Signature:

Date:

COURSE IDENTIFYING DETAILS:

Level of Training:

Training Organisation Name:

Course Title:

Course Reference Number:

Training Organisation Address:

Address of main teaching base:

Primary Contact Name:

Primary Contact Job Title:

Tel:

Email:

Name of External Examiner

Training organisation to which EE is affiliated and/or EE’s place of work

1

STATUS OF COURSE

Main/Index Course

Name of course:

DATE OF LAST ACCREDITATION:

Was this a Panel Visit / Paper-Based accreditation? Has this main/index course been active during the last academic year? If yes, complete section 1

Yes/No

Yes/No

Satellites - Does this course have satellite centres i.e. identical courses run at different venues? If yes, complete both section 1 for main index course and section 2 for satellites

Does this course have accredited satellite centres that have not run since last review? Please state here……………………………………………………………………

Associates - Does this course have associate centres i.e. courses that have the same overall managing organisational context as the main accredited course but with some differences? If yes, complete both section 1 for main index course and section 3 for associates.

2

Annual Review AFT Accredited Training courses

Section 1 for Main/Index course

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IN RELATION TO THE MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED COHORT OF STUDENTS

Start date of cohort covered by this review:

Completion date of cohort covered by this review:

Number of students registered at start of course:

Number of students who completed and passed the course at time of review:

Of the students who did not complete the course, how many?

Left course before completion:

Failed course:

How many students are still in the process of completing the course:

Staff details

List of Staff:

Name UKCP registration number

Proportion/number of teaching hours delivered on the course

3

CHANGES MADE TO THE COURSE SINCE THE LAST ACCREDITATION (not already advised in previous annual reviews) with regard to the following:

New staff:Please attach CV’s (there is no need to include guest speakers in this list) and note if they are UKCP registered

Staff who have left since last review (names only)

Course

Course delivery:Please give a brief summary of any changes and developments in the course structure, hours, content or teaching methods or assessment for this cohort.Include responses to feedback from previous cohort

We draw your attention to the completion of the 4th Edition of the Blue Book. All courses will now be expected to consider any changes to their courses in line with new requirements. We appreciate that these changes require considerable attention and time to consider and therefore courses will be assessed for AFT Accreditation on the new criteria only from 2019. You are encouraged to use the 4th Edition of the Blue Book as your reference with a view to ensuring the standards of your course are developing in line with new requirements.

Could you identify areas in your course that will require changes in order to meet the requirements of the 4th edition of The Blue Book?

Have any changes yet been planned to this effect and if so could you explain anything that has been put in place on the course that attends new guidelines.

4

Context and partnership /validation relationships

Please state any changes in course premises or in the key partnerships or funding for the course e.g. University, Local Authority/NHS

Progression locally

Does the course have local options for progression e.g. Intermediate / MSc / Supervision?

FEEDBACK

Please attach a summary of student feedback and note your response to any points raised by students

Complaints – have any complaints been received by the course? Please add details

5

Section 2 for Satellite centres (please duplicate this section for each satellite)

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IN RELATION TO THE MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED COHORT OF STUDENTS

Name of satellite course

Venue address

Date of last accreditation of this Satellite course

Start date of cohort covered by this review:

Completion date of cohort covered by this review:

Number of students registered at start of course:

Number of students who completed and passed the course at time of review:

Of the students who did not complete the course, how many?

Left course before completion:

Failed course:

How many students are still in the process of completing the course:

Staff details (if different from main/index course)

List of Staff:

Name UKCP registration number

Proportion/number of teaching hours delivered on the course

6

CHANGES MADE TO THE COURSE SINCE THE LAST ACCREDITATION (not already advised in previous annual reviews) with regard to the following:

New staff:Please attach CV’s (there is no need to include guest speakers in this list) and note if they are UKCP registered

Staff who have left since last review (names only)

Course

Course delivery:Please give a brief summary of any changes and developments in the course structure, hours, content or teaching methods or assessment for this cohort.Include responses to feedback from previous cohort

We draw your attention to the completion of the 4th Edition of the Blue Book. All courses will now be expected to consider any changes to their courses in line with new requirements. We appreciate that these changes require considerable attention and time to consider and therefore courses will be assessed for AFT Accreditation on the new criteria only from 2019. You are encouraged to use the 4th Edition of the Blue Book as your reference with a view to ensuring the standards of your course are developing in line with new requirements.

Could you identify areas in your course that will require changes in order to meet the requirements of the 4th edition of The Blue Book?

Have any changes yet been planned to this effect and if so could you explain anything that has been put in place on the course that attends new guidelines.

7

Context and partnership/validation relationships

Please state any changes in course premises or in the key partnerships or funding for the course e.g. University, Local Authority/NHS

Progression locally

Does the course have local options for progression e.g. Intermediate / MSc / Supervision?

FEEDBACK

Please attach a summary of student feedback and note your response to any points raised by students

Complaints – have any complaints been received by the course? Please add details

If this is the first accreditation of this satellite course:

Please send a copy of the satellite handbook to AFT with this annual review.

Please send a copy of the external examiner report.

Please send a selection of written assignments across all ranges with the marking and tutor feedback etc.

8

Section 3 for Associate courses (please duplicate this section for each associate)

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IN RELATION TO THE MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED COHORT OF STUDENTS

Name of Associate course

Venue address

Date of last accreditation of this Associate course

Start date of cohort covered by this review:

Completion date of cohort covered by this review:

Number of students registered at start of course:

Number of students who completed and passed the course at time of review:

Of the students who did not complete the course, how many?

Left course before completion:

Failed course:

How many students are still in the process of completing the course:

List of Staff:

Name UKCP registration number

Proportion/number of teaching hours delivered on the course

9

CHANGES MADE TO THE COURSE SINCE THE LAST ACCREDITATION (not already advised in previous annual reviews) with regard to the following:

New staff:Please attach CV’s (there is no need to include guest speakers in this list) and note if they are UKCP registered

Staff who have left since last review (names only)

Course

Course delivery:Please give a brief summary of any changes and developments in the course structure, hours, content or teaching methods or assessment for this cohort.Include responses to feedback from previous cohort

We draw your attention to the completion of the 4th Edition of the Blue Book. All courses will now be expected to consider any changes to their courses in line with new requirements. We appreciate that these changes require considerable attention and time to consider and therefore courses will be assessed for AFT Accreditation on the new criteria only from 2019. You are encouraged to use the 4th Edition of the Blue Book as your reference with a view to ensuring the standards of your course are developing in line with new requirements.

Could you identify areas in your course that will require changes in order to meet the requirements of the 4th edition of The Blue Book?

Have any changes yet been planned to this effect and if so could you explain anything that has been put in place on the course that attends new guidelines.

10

Context and partnership /validation relationships

Please state any changes in course premises or in the key partnerships or funding for the course e.g. University, Local Authority/NHS

Progression locally

Does the course have local options for progression e.g. Intermediate / MSc / Supervision?

FEEDBACK

Please attach a summary of student feedback and note your response to any points raised by students

Complaints – have any complaints been received by the course? Please add details

11

Section 4 – for all courses

APEL Policy

Information regarding students admitted under the professional aspects of the APEL policy, in the

cohort under review.

Students admitted to or trainings who do not have a relevant first professional qualification. If

none, please state none

Total number = ……………………

Basis for admission Number of Students in Category

More than 5 years’ experience of systemic practice

Qualification in health and social care

Employed in health or social care agency in an appropriate capacity

Other reason (eg Inclusivity / widening participation to Foundation training Issues)

FIRST COHORT FOLLOWING ACCREDITATION ONLY:

Please indicate how the course has met requirements advised of during the accreditation process?

Please indicate how the course has paid attention to recommendations made during the accreditation process?

May we please remind you that your course must continue to adhere to the AFT Code of Ethics and Code of Practice which you will find on the following page of our website http://www.aft.org.uk/members/ethics.asp

12

PANELLISTS REVIEWER FEEDBACK – Main Course

If this is the first cohort following accreditation has the course met any requirements set? – Yes / no

Comments

Has the course addressed any recommendations made? – Yes / no

Comments

For subsequent cohorts

Does this review indicate continuation of the standard expected at accreditation? Yes / No

If “No” please specify actions required e.g. Does this affect accreditation and should therefore be more formally reviewed?

Do we need more information from the course to complete this review?

Signed

Signed

Date

13

PANELLISTS REVIEWER FEEDBACK – Satellite course 1st accreditation (duplicate if necessary)

Training organisation name:

Name and level of course:

Satellite location:

Has the course organiser signed the statement of equivalence to confirm that the course presented as a satellite is has the same overall managing organisational context, the same marking, teaching topics and awards as the Main Course but usually takes place at a site remote from the Main Course and is therefore a Satellite Course to the Main Accredited Course?

Yes / No

Have you reviewed student feedback and are satisfied with the comments?

Yes / No

Comments

Have you seen an external examiners report where available?

Yes/ No

Comments

Have you seen the course handbook?

Yes/ No

Has the course provided information regarding any complaints made?

Yes / No

Comments

Have you seen a range of assessment outcomes?

Yes/ No

Comments

Are you satisfied that this is a satellite course to the main course and meets the standard expected at accreditation?

Yes / No

Do we need more information from the course to complete this review?

Signed

14

Signed

Date

For subsequent satellite annual reviews

PANELLISTS REVIEWER FEEDBACK – Satellite course (duplicate as necessary for each satellite)

Training organisation name:

Name and level of course:

Satellite location:

Has the course met any requirements set? – Yes / no

Comments

Has the course addressed any recommendations made? – Yes / no

Comments

Does this review indicate continuation of the standard expected at accreditation? Yes / No

If “No” please specify actions required e.g. Does this affect accreditation and should therefore be more formally reviewed?

Do we need more information from the course to complete this review?

Signed

Signed

Date

15

PANELLISTS REVIEWER FEEDBACK – Associate course

Training organisation name:

Name and level of course:

Association location:

Has the course met any requirements set? – Yes / no

Comments

Has the course met any recommendations set? – Yes / no

Comments

Does this review indicate continuation of the standard expected at accreditation? Yes / No

If “No” please specify actions required e.g. Does this affect accreditation and should therefore be more formally reviewed?

Do we need more information from the course to complete this review?

Signed

Signed

Date

16