cation statistics - fhi 360 south sudan education...the education management information system...

68
Education Statistics Government of Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction State Statistical Booklet for Warrap Warrap

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jan-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

Education Statistics

Government ofRepublic of

South SudanMinistry of General Education

and Instruction

State Statistical Booklet

for Warrap

Warrap

Page 2: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

1

Republic of South Sudan Ministry of General Education and Instruction Directorate of Planning and Budgeting Department of Data and Statistics Education Management Information Systems Unit Juba, South Sudan www.goss.org © Ministry of General Education and Instruction 2012 This publication may be used as a part or as a whole, provided that the MoGEI is acknowledged as the source of information. This publication has been produced with financial and technical support from UNICEF, FHI360, and SCiSS. For inquiries or requests, please use the following contact information: George Mogga / Director for Planning and Budgeting / [email protected] Fahim Akbar / Senior EMIS Advisor / [email protected] Moses Kong / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Paulino Kamba / EMIS Officer / [email protected] Joanes Odero / Programme Associate / [email protected] Deng Chol Deng / Programme Associate / [email protected]

Page 3: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

2

Foreword

Message from Minister Joseph Ukel Abango

On behalf of the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), I am pleased for the fifth education census data for the Republic of South Sudan (RSS). The collection and consolidation of the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of Learning Spaces (RALS) conducted in 2006. RALS covered less than half of the primary schools operating in the country at the time. By 2011, data from pre-primary, primary, secondary, an Alternative Education Systems (AES), and technical and vocational education and training (TVET) schools, centres, and institutes were collected. To plan and budget effectively a country needs reliable and relevant data. It also needs information about how the educational system is developing and changing. The needs in the education sector, as in most other sectors in RSS are vast, and the limited resources have to be used strategically to ensure cost-effectiveness. In light of this, the EMIS data assists us identifying needs and priorities and design the

appropriate interventions. Once implemented, EMIS assists us in monitoring if the interventions are having the desired outcome. The RSS encompasses vast geographical areas. Due to the decades of civil war, roads are few. This, coupled with temporary insecurities in some areas, have made data collection challenging. However, due to commitment and hard work, the Annual Education Census (AEC) coverage has grown rapidly, from 77% in 2007 to 94% in 2011. However, great amounts of work remain ahead. Having established the fundamental aspects of EMIS and its process, the MoGEI EMIS Unit has begun to focus on decentralisation of EMIS to the State Ministries of Education (SMoE) via capacity building. Universal school registers were piloted in all—or 700 plus—schools of Eastern Equatoria and Northern Bahr-el-Ghazal. The SMoE EMIS focal points in the five states of Central Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria, Western Equatoria, Northern Bahr-el-Ghazal, and Unity received training on data capture—that is, AEC questionnaire data verification and electronic data entry. The EMIS Unit worked closely with the County Education Directors and Payam Inspectors in the Equatorias, Western Bahr-el-Ghazal, parts of Jonglei, and parts of Upper Nile to collect geographic information system (GIS) coordinates of primary, secondary, and AES schools and centres. The MoGEI EMIS Unit hopes to roll out the school registers, decentralised data capture, and GIS data collection in all ten states by 2013. This publication would not have been possible without the cooperation, involvement, and support from the SMoE—in particular, the SMoE EMIS focal points. Their dedication and hard work have been crucial in increasing the education census coverage rates and ensuring the quality of the information gathered. We also thank our partners in the education environment, especially UNICEF and Family Health International 360 (FHI360), for their continuous support in improving the RSS EMIS. Sincerely,

Hon Joseph Ukel Abango Ministry of General Education and Instruction

Page 4: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

3

Table of Contents 1.0. ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................................ 6

2.1. Background and Context ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2. About the EMIS Unit .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.3. Utilisation of EMIS Data ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4. History of EMIS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5. EMIS Process ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.6. About the Booklet .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.7. How to read the data in this booklet ....................................................................................................................................... 8

3.0. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................................................... 9

3.1. Indicators used to measure coverage ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Indicators used to measure access ......................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3. Indicators used to measure resource ..................................................................................................................................... 10 3.4. Indicators used to measure student flow ............................................................................................................................... 10

4.0. EMIS DATA, 2009-2011 .................................................................................................................................................. 12

4.1. Pre-primary school................................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.1.1. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 4.1.2. Pupils ............................................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.1.3. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.1.4. Classrooms .................................................................................................................................................................... 13

4.2. Primary school ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.1. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.2. Pupils ............................................................................................................................................................................ 14 4.2.3. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 15 4.2.4. Classrooms .................................................................................................................................................................... 16

4.3. Secondary school ................................................................................................................................................................. 17 4.3.1. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.3.2. Students ........................................................................................................................................................................ 17 4.3.3. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 18 4.3.4. Classrooms .................................................................................................................................................................... 19

4.4. Alternative Education System (AES) Centres .......................................................................................................................... 20 4.4.1. Centres .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.4.2. Students ........................................................................................................................................................................ 20 4.4.3. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21

4.5. Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) ........................................................................................................ 22 4.5.1. Centres .......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.5.2. Trainees ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22 4.5.3. Teachers/trainers ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.5.4. Programmes .................................................................................................................................................................. 22

5.0. PRE-PRIMARY SCHOOL, 2011 ........................................................................................................................................ 23

5.1. Access ................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 5.1.1. Enrolment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.1.2. Overage pupils ............................................................................................................................................................... 23

5.2. Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................ 24 5.2.1. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................................... 24 5.2.2. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 24 5.2.3. Classrooms .................................................................................................................................................................... 26 5.2.4. Curriculum and instruction .............................................................................................................................................. 27 5.2.5. Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................................ 27

6.0. PRIMARY SCHOOL, 2011 ................................................................................................................................................ 28

6.1. Access ................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 6.1.1. Enrolment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 28 6.1.2. Overage pupils ............................................................................................................................................................... 29 6.1.3. New entrants ................................................................................................................................................................. 30 6.1.4. Pupils with special needs ................................................................................................................................................ 31

6.2. Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................ 33 6.2.1. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................................... 33 6.2.2. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 34 6.2.3. Classrooms .................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Page 5: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

4

6.2.4. Curriculum and instruction .............................................................................................................................................. 39 6.2.5. Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................................ 41

6.3. Student flow ......................................................................................................................................................................... 43 6.3.1. Promotion rate ............................................................................................................................................................... 43 6.3.2. Repetition rate ............................................................................................................................................................... 44 6.3.3. Dropout rate .................................................................................................................................................................. 44

7.0. SECONDARY SCHOOL, 2011 ........................................................................................................................................... 46

7.1. Access ................................................................................................................................................................................. 46 7.1.1. Enrolment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 46 7.1.2. Overage pupils ............................................................................................................................................................... 46 7.1.3. Students with special needs ............................................................................................................................................ 47

7.2. Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................ 48 7.2.1. Schools .......................................................................................................................................................................... 48 7.2.2. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 49 7.2.3. Classrooms .................................................................................................................................................................... 52 7.2.4. Curriculum and instruction .............................................................................................................................................. 52 7.2.5. Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................................ 53

7.3. Student flow ......................................................................................................................................................................... 53 7.3.1. Promotion rate ............................................................................................................................................................... 53 7.3.2. Repetition rate ............................................................................................................................................................... 54 7.3.3. Dropout rate .................................................................................................................................................................. 54

8.0. ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION SYSTEM (AES), 2011 .......................................................................................................... 55

8.1. Access ................................................................................................................................................................................. 55 8.1.1. Enrolment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 55

8.2. Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................ 56 8.2.1. Centres .......................................................................................................................................................................... 56 8.2.2. Teachers ........................................................................................................................................................................ 57 8.2.3. Classrooms .................................................................................................................................................................... 60 8.2.4. Curriculum and instruction .............................................................................................................................................. 60

8.3. Student flow ......................................................................................................................................................................... 60 8.3.1. Dropouts ....................................................................................................................................................................... 60

8.4. Programme profiles .............................................................................................................................................................. 62 8.4.1. Accelerated Learning Programme (ALP) .......................................................................................................................... 62 8.4.2. Basic Functional Adult Literacy (BFAL) ............................................................................................................................. 64

9.0. TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (TVET), 2011 .................................................................. 65

9.1. Access ................................................................................................................................................................................. 65 9.1.1. Enrolment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 65

9.2. Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................ 65 9.2.1. Centres .......................................................................................................................................................................... 65 9.2.2. Teachers/trainers ........................................................................................................................................................... 65 9.2.3. Curriculum ..................................................................................................................................................................... 66 9.2.4. Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................................ 66

9.3. Student flow ......................................................................................................................................................................... 66 9.3.1. TVET centre completion ................................................................................................................................................. 66

9.4. Operations ........................................................................................................................................................................... 66 9.4.1. Operational status .......................................................................................................................................................... 66 9.4.2. Fee/tuition ..................................................................................................................................................................... 66

10.0. Missing schools ............................................................................................................................................................... 67

10.1. Pre-primary schools .............................................................................................................................................................. 67 10.2. Primary schools .................................................................................................................................................................... 67 10.3. Secondary schools ................................................................................................................................................................ 67 10.4. TVET centres ........................................................................................................................................................................ 67

Page 6: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

5

1.0. ACRONYMS AEC Annual Education Census AES Alternative Education System ALP Accelerated Learning Programme BFAL Basic Functional Adult Literacy CE Central Equatoria CEC County Education Centre CGS Community Girls School CRS Catholic Relief Services DDM (Global ED*ASSIST) Data Dissemination Module ED*ASSIST (Global) Education Automated Statistical Information System Toolkit EDC Education Development Centre EE Eastern Equatoria EMIS Education Management Information System FHI360 Family Health International 360 (formerly Academy for Educational Development) GER Gross enrolment rate GIR Gross intake rate GIS Geographic information system IEC Intensive English Course MDG Millennium Development Goals MoGEI Ministry of General Education and Instruction MoHEST Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology NBG Northern Bahr-El-Ghazal NBS National Bureau of Statistics (formerly South Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation) NER Net enrolment rate NIR Net intake rate PCR Pupil-classroom ratio PMS Pastoralist Mobile School PTR Pupil-teacher ratio (also known as the student-teacher ratio (STR)) PTextR Pupil-textbook ratio RALS Rapid Assessment of Learning Spaces RSS Republic of South Sudan SCiSS Save the Children in South Sudan SMoE State Ministry of Education TTI Teacher Training Institute TVET Technical / Vocational Education and Training UIS UNESCO Institute of Statistics UN Upper Nile UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund WBG Western Bahr-El-Ghazal WE Western Equatoria

Page 7: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

6

2.0. INTRODUCTION

“We cherish education for all our people equally and aim to provide a lifelong education for all children and adults of South Sudan, an education that is relevant and based on the needs of the people, to enable them to be responsible and productive citizens.”

RSS MoGEI mission

2.1. Background and Context

In South Sudan, the majority of adults and children have not had the opportunity to attend school due to decades of civil war. During that time the development of basic services was non-existent and accessing the little infrastructure that did exist was difficult. As a strategy to achieving the goals above the Republic of South Sudan (RSS) Ministry of Education (MoGEI) constructed a parallel system of formal and alternative education systems. The formal education ladder is an 8-4-4 system—that is, 8 years of primary education, 4 years of secondary education, and 4 years of higher education. The alternative education system (AES) consists of 6 different programmes, and offers flexible entry and exit points for children, youth, and adults. The technical and vocational education and training (TVET) prepares trainees for practical and applicable skills that will lead to occupations either in the form of a job or as livelihood.

Figure 1. RSS education ladder

Year Age

19

Vocational/technical education and training

(includes technical secondary education)

24 18 23 17 22 16

University/College education

In-service teacher training

21 15

Pre-service teacher training*

20 14 19 13 18 12

Secondary school Senior 1 (S1) to Senior 4 (S4)

17 11 16 10 15 9 14 8

Primary school Primary 1 (P1) to Primary 8 (P8)

13 7 12 6 11 5 10 4 9 3 8 2 7 1 6

*Pre-service teacher training lasts three (3) years for P8 leavers and two (2) years for secondary leavers.

The Ministry’s main aim is to ensure that all individuals have access to primary school education regardless of age, special needs, and gender. These goals reflect the government’s commitment to achieve two of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 2 and 3. To this end the Ministry is focusing on developing the basic education sector through 1) teacher education and professional development, 2) capital investment, 3) Alternative Education System, 4) gender equity and access for all, 5) capacity enhancement of education institutions.

2.2. About the EMIS Unit

Figure 2. RSS MoGEI organogram

The EMIS Unit is housed within MoGEI under the Directorate for Planning and Budgeting in the Department for Data and Statistics. The Unit was established in early 2007, and since then has administered the AEC and managed the storing,

Page 8: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

7

analysis, utilisation, and distribution of education information. The organogram below illustrates the structure of the MoGEI.

2.3. Utilisation of EMIS Data

EMIS gives an overview of the education system and its performance in a country. It facilitates decision-and policy-making by providing information on the current condition of the system. EMIS data plays an important role in mapping the educational needs so authorities may decide how to best allocate the limited resources in the face of competing priorities. EMIS can be used for 1) monitoring progress, 2) identifying challenges, and 3) strategizing possible solution at the national, state, county, and school levels. It is equally important to recognise that EMIS is merely a tool; it does not give answers to challenges. The data presented in this booklet form a set of present and baseline data. Consistent updates are necessary to ensure their continued utilisation.

2.4. History of EMIS

EMIS in South Sudan has come a long way since collecting baseline data in 2006, which provided the first baseline figures on the South Sudan’s education system.1

EMIS commenced in 2007, the year that the EMIS Unit was integrated with the Ministry. Since then, its coverage rate—or the percentage of known schools reached by the AEC exercise—has increased rapidly: from 77% coverage of Primary and AES in 2007 to 94% coverage rate of Pre-primary, Primary, Secondary, and AES in 2011.

Coverage Rates by Education Sector, 2006-2011 Year Pre-primary Primary Secondary AES* Average** 2006 - 81% - Combined with Primary 81% 2007 - 77% - Combined with Primary 77% 2008 - 87% 96% - 86.5% 2009 - 95% 90% - 95% 2010 96% 96.8% 93.5% - 96% 2011 82.2% 96% 85.2% - 94% * There is no baseline number and list of AES centres provided by the Ministry. Therefore coverage rate remains unknown. ** Primary education coverage rate is the dominant part of this calculation. As of 2011, there were more than 3,440 primary schools, while there were less than 200 secondary schools.

In addition to the pre-primary, primary, secondary, and AES sectors, TVET centres and technical secondary schools were covered in the 2011 Annual Education Census. As 2011 was the first year of comprehensive coverage for the sector, the 2011 data comprises the baseline.2

2.5. EMIS Process

The EMIS Process consists of four (4) steps: 1) Data collection: Designing and reviewing of the AEC questionnaires, training of head teachers on questionnaire

completion, verifying the data through the County Education Centres (CEC) and State Ministries of Education (SMoE), and retrieval of the completed questionnaires.

2) Data processing: Entering of data into a common database, merging of all data, and final data cleaning prior to analysis.

3) Data dissemination: Analysis and production of tools for use in planning and budgeting. The National and State Education Statistical Booklets comprise one of the tools.

4) Data utilisation: Series of training that guide the national, state, and county education agencies and their partner organizations on the application of EMIS data in building short-, mid-, and long-term strategic plans and budgets.

Each step requires extensive planning and coordination with stakeholders at the state, county, payam (a sub-geographic unit to the county), and school levels.

2.6. About the Booklet

EMIS data is collected from government schools as well as private and community-run schools. As there exists no school registration and operational status reporting protocols, the EMIS Unit is not able to track all schools in South Sudan. The booklet reports unadjusted numbers. For instance, the 2011 Primary school coverage was 96% comprised of 3,447 schools. The booklet reports on the 3,447 schools, leaving aside the remaining 4% of unknown schools. There exists no baseline data for AES; MoGEI currently possesses no list of AES centres or total number AES centres. Missing schools are listed in the Section 10 of this booklet.

1 Preceding the RALS study were: School Based Assessment (SBA) project in 2003; Towards a Baseline study by the New Sudan Centre for Statistics and Evaluation and UNICEF in

2004; and Sudan Basic Education Program (SBEP)-led Annual Education Census (AEC) in 2005. 2 This booklet covers 61 TVET centres. While this number does not represent all of South Sudan’s TVET centres, it serves a solid baseline. Statistical inferences are limited due to the

small amount of representation.

Data Collection Data Processing Data Dissemination Data Utilization

Page 9: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

8

Two (2) types of data were used in the compilation of this booklet: 1) 2009-2011 AEC outputs and 2) population projection based on the 2008 population data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).3

This booklet is a reference document for government and others relevant organisations, agencies, and individuals. Its purpose is to simply report what was reported by individual schools’ head teachers and verified by its respective CEC and SMoE.

The electronic copy of this booklet, state booklets, and the Global Data Dissemination Module (DDM) can be accessed at http://southsudan.ed-assist.net/. The DDM contains the latest data and reports more information than this booklet. The EMIS Unit provides interested parties with the installation CD upon request.

2.7. How to read the data in this booklet

The booklet displays information in three ways: 1) table, 2) graph with raw numbers, and 3) graph with percentages.4

There are only two types of graphs: 1) bar graph and 2) pie graph. Below describes the various aspects of data presentation for increased understanding and interpretation of the numbers.

3 Projections have been made using UNESCO Institute of Statistics (UIS)-defined population growth rates. The population numbers do not include migration estimates. 4 Not all means are used for information that such detailed reporting is not necessary due to the simple representation of data in a table.

Page 10: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

9

3.0. DEFINITIONS 3.1. Indicators used to measure coverage 3.1.1. Coverage rate refers to the percentage of known schools reached and accounted for in the AEC. For instance, a

coverage rate of 95% means 95% of the known schools received the AEC questionnaire, responded, and the completed questionnaire was entered into the EMIS database. The schools that were covered in the previous year but did not respond to this year’s AEC questionnaire are considered “missing.” Security situations and severe weather conditions comprise the primary reasons for missed coverage. Schools confirmed to be out of operation are not included in the coverage rate calculation. Also excluded are schools yet to be identified and entered into the EMIS database. The AEC exercise discovers new schools each year. In 2011, the overall coverage rate was 94%.

3.2. Indicators used to measure access 3.2.1. New entrants refer to new pupils of any age entering P1 for the first time in a school year. Entrants include pupils who

have attended school elsewhere but beginning in P1 in a new school. Pupils who have left school but returned to school in P1 are also considered new entrants. Pupils attending P1 at the same school since the previous year are NOT new entrants; they are considered “repeaters” (further defined below). New entrants count is used to calculate the gross intake rate (GIR) and net intake rate (NIR) (also further defined below).

“Am I a NEW ENTRANT?”

YES I’m attending P1 for the very first time. NO I was in P1 last year at your school.

3.2.2. Gross intake rate (GIR) indicates the general level of access to primary education. It also indicates the capacity of the

education system to provide access to P1 for the official school entrance age population. This rate can be over 100%, when the number of over-aged and under-aged children in P1 is excessive, relative to the children of the right age of admission. The “official primary school entrance age” in South Sudan is age 6. The formula for GIR is:

GIR =

Total number of new entrants of all ages in P1 X 100%

Population of all age 6 children

3.2.3. Net intake rate (NIR) shows the level of access to primary education of the eligible population of primary school-

entrance age. A high NIR indicates a high degree of access to primary education for children of the official primary school entrance age. For countries wanting to achieve goal of universal primary education, a NIR of 100% will be a necessary. The “official primary school entrance age” in South Sudan is age 6. The formula for NIR is:

NIR =

Total number of new entrants of age 6 in P1 X 100%

Population of all age 6 children

GIR and NIR are useful when used in combination, as the difference between these two (2) ratios indicates the rate of deviation from the official age intake.

3.2.4. Gross enrollment rate (GER) is used to show the general level of participation in a given level of education. A GER

value of 100% indicates that a country is, in principle, able to accommodate all of its school-aged population. The “official school-age” for primary education in South Sudan is 6-13, and secondary education 14-17. The formulas for primary GER and secondary GER are:

Primary GER =

Total number of pupils of all ages in primary school X 100%

Population of ages 6-13 children

Secondary GER =

Total number of students of all ages in secondary school X 100%

Population of ages 14-17 children

3.2.5. Net enrollment rate (NER) shows the proportion of children of school age who are enrolled in school. NER applies only

to children of official school age. NER below 100% provides a measure of school age children who are not enrolled in school. As NER only accounts for students of “official school-age,” NER is always less than or equal to GER. The “official school-age” for primary education in South Sudan is 6-13, and secondary education 14-17. The formulas for primary NER and secondary NER are:

Primary NER =

Total number of pupils in school of ages 6-13 X 100%

Population of ages 6-13 children

Page 11: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

10

Secondary NER =

Total number of students in school of ages 14-17 X 100%

Population of ages 14-17 children

3.3. Indicators used to measure resource 3.3.1. Pupil-teacher ratio (PTR), also known as the student-teacher ratio (STR), measures the level of human resources input

in terms of number of teachers in relation to the number of pupils. A high PTR suggests that each teacher has to be responsible for a large number of pupils. In other words, the higher the PTR, the lower is the relative access of pupils to teachers. It is generally assumed that a low PTR signifies smaller classes, which enables the teacher to pay more attention to individual students, which will likely in the long run result in a better performance of the pupils. The formula for PTR is:

PTR =

Total number of students

Total number of teachers

3.3.2. Pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) measures the level of basic facilities available in terms of number of classrooms in relation

to the size of the pupil population. The higher the PCR, the lower is the relative access of pupils to classrooms. It is generally assumed that a low PCR signifies an environment more conducive to learning, likely in the long run to result in a better performance of the pupils. To support the education reform towards providing all students with stable learning spaces, this report counts only permanent and semi-permanent classrooms in the calculation.5

The formula for PCR is:

PCR =

Total number of students

Total number of perm. and semi-perm. classrooms

3.3.3. Pupil-Textbook Ratio (PTextR) measures the level of learning materials available in terms of number of textbooks in

relation to the number of pupils. The higher the PTextR, the lower is the relative access of pupils to textbooks. It is generally assumed that a low PTextR signifies a condition more conducive to learning, likely in the long run to result in a better performance of the pupils. To support the education reform towards providing all students with textbooks for core subjects, this report counts only English and Mathematics textbooks in the calculation. The formula for PTextR for English and Math textbooks are:

PTextR (English) =

Total number of students

Total number of English textbooks

PTextR (Math) =

Total number of students

Total number of Math textbooks

3.4. Indicators used to measure student flow

3.4.1. Promoters refer to pupils who have moved on to the next grade level from one year to the next, ending up in one grade

level higher from last year. By convention, a pupil in P3 last year should be in P4 this year. If a pupil has moved on to P4 for this year, the pupils is considered a promoter. The diagram below illustrates this scenario (see Figure 3 below).

3.4.2. Promotion rate measures the phenomenon of pupils from a cohort moving up a grade, and its effect on the internal efficiency of education systems. It is one of the key indicators for analysing and projecting pupil flows from grade to grade within the education cycle. Promotion rate ideally should approach 100%; a low promotion rate signals problems in the internal efficiency of the education system. Decreasing promotion rates serve as an early warning that the system is experiencing capacity constraints. When compared across grades, the patterns can indicate specific grades for which there is lower promotion, hence requiring more in depth study of causes and possible remedies.

Promotion Rate =

Enrolment in cohort in (y+1) – Repeaters in (y+1) X 100%

Enrolment in cohort in y

3.4.3. Repeaters refer to pupils who have not been promoted to the next grade level from one year to the next, ending up in

the same grade in the current year as last year. A pupil in P3 last year should be in P4 this year. If the pupil has stayed in P3 for this year, the pupil is considered a repeater. The diagram below illustrates this scenario (see Figure 4 below).

5 Permanent classrooms refer to those constructed of bricks or cement. Semi-permanent classrooms refer to those constructed of mud.

Page 12: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

11

Figure 3. Pupil promoted to next grade, 2010-2011 Figure 4. Pupil repeating a grade 2010-2011

2010 2011 2010 2011 P3

P3 P3

P3

P4 P4

P4 P4

3.4.4. Repetition rate measures the phenomenon of pupils from a cohort repeating a grade, and its effect on the internal efficiency of education systems. It is one of the key indicators for analysing and projecting pupil flows from grade to grade within the education cycle. Repetition rate should ideally be 0%; a high repetition rate signals problems in the internal efficiency of the education system. Increasing repetition rate serves as an early warning that the system is experiencing capacity constraints. When compared across grades, the patterns can indicate specific grades for which there is higher repetition, hence requiring more in depth study of causes and possible remedies.

Repetition Rate =

Repeaters in cohort in y+1 X 100%

Enrolment in cohort in y

3.4.5. Dropouts refer to pupils who have withdrawn (for any reason)

from the school system without completing a given grade in a given school year. The distinction between dropouts and repeaters: repeaters, though not promoted to the next grade level in the following year, do remain in the school system. Dropouts are considered not to.

Cohort dropout count

= Enrolment in cohort in

y –

Enrolment in cohort in

y +1 –

Repeaters in cohort in

y +1

3.4.6. Dropout rate monitors education system coverage and student progression by measuring the proportion of students in a

given cohort dropping out of—or leaving—the system altogether. The formula for dropout rate is:

Dropout Rate =

Dropouts in cohort in y+1 X 100%

Enrolment in cohort in y

Page 13: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

12

4.0. EMIS DATA, 2009-2011 4.1. Pre-primary school 4.1.1. Schools

Number and % of pre-primary schools by county and ownership type, 2011 County Year Total Gov Non-gov Gov % Non-gov % Gogrial E. 2011 5 2 3 40.0% 60.0% Gogrial W. 2011 1 1 - 100.0% - Tonj S. 2011 1 - 1 - 100.0% Twic 2011 4 2 2 50.0% 50.0% Total 2011 11 5 6 45.5% 54.5% * “Government” includes government and government-aided schools. “Non-government” includes community, NGO-supported, private, other, and unknown ownership type schools. ** Note, no data was collected on pre-primary schools in Warrap state in 2010.

4.1.2. Pupils

Number and % pre-primary school pupil enrolment by county and gender, 2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % Gogrial E. 2011 291 193 98 66.3% 33.7% Gogrial W. 2011 243 182 61 74.9% 25.1% Tonj S. 2011 148 79 69 53.4% 46.6% Twic 2011 697 489 208 70.2% 29.8% Total 2011 1,379 943 436 68.4% 31.6%

Number of pre-primary school pupils by county, 2011

4.1.3. Teachers

No. and % of pre-primary school teachers and pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and gender, 2010-2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % PTR Gogrial E. 2011 28 25 3 89.3% 10.7% 10.4 Gogrial W. 2011 6 2 4 33.3% 66.7% 40.5 Tonj S. 2011 4 3 1 75.0% 25.0% 37.0 Twic 2011 14 12 2 85.7% 14.3% 49.8 Total 2011 52 42 10 80.8% 19.2% 26.5

Number of pre-primary school teachers by county, 2011

Pre-primary school PTR by county, 2011

0

200

400

600

800

Twic Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Tonj S.

2011

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S.

2011

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Total

2011

Page 14: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

13

4.1.4. Classrooms

Number of pre-primary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county and type, 2011 County Year Total Perm Semi-perm Open-air Other PCR Gogrial E. 2011 23 7 15 1 - 13.2 Gogrial W. 2011 1 1 - - - 243.0 Tonj S. 2011 4 4 - - - 37.0 Twic 2011 16 - 6 10 - 116.2 Total 2011 44 12 21 11 - 41.8 * “Other” includes roof-only, tent, and others. ** PCR only accounts for permanent and semi-permanent classrooms.

Number of pre-primary school classrooms by county, 2011

Pre-primary school PCR by county, 2011

0

5

10

15

20

25

Gogrial E. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial W.

2011

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Total

2011

Page 15: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

14

4.2. Primary school 4.2.1. Schools

Number and % of primary schools by county and ownership type, 2009-2011 County Year Total Gov Non-gov Gov % Non-gov % Gogrial E. 2011 50 40 10 80.0% 20.0% 2010 43 36 7 83.7% 16.3% 2009 38 33 5 86.8% 13.2% Gogrial W. 2011 97 77 20 79.4% 20.6% 2010 81 70 11 86.4% 13.6% 2009 86 79 7 91.9% 8.1% Tonj E. 2011 36 29 7 80.6% 19.4% 2010 42 41 1 97.6% 2.4% 2009 39 38 1 97.4% 2.6% Tonj N. 2011 75 45 30 60.0% 40.0% 2010 65 60 5 92.3% 7.7% 2009 50 48 2 96.0% 4.0% Tonj S. 2011 49 38 11 77.6% 22.4% 2010 51 49 2 96.1% 3.9% 2009 52 49 3 94.2% 5.8% Twic 2011 111 82 29 73.9% 26.1% 2010 104 90 14 86.5% 13.5% 2009 94 91 3 96.8% 3.2% Total 2011 418 311 107 74.4% 25.6% 2010 386 346 40 89.6% 10.4% 2009 359 338 21 94.2% 5.8% * “Government” includes government and government-aided schools. “Non-government” includes community, NGO-supported, private, other, and unknown ownership type schools.

Number of primary schools by county, 2009-2011

4.2.2. Pupils

Number and % of primary school pupils by county and gender, 2009-2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % Gogrial E. 2011 16,452 11,970 4,482 72.8% 27.2% 2010 17,074 12,643 4,431 74.0% 26.0% 2009 15,683 11,872 3,811 75.7% 24.3% Gogrial W. 2011 35,616 24,301 11,315 68.2% 31.8% 2010 44,822 31,913 12,909 71.2% 28.8% 2009 49,479 34,265 15,214 69.3% 30.7% Tonj E. 2011 9,458 7,529 1,929 79.6% 20.4% 2010 14,842 11,922 2,920 80.3% 19.7% 2009 12,940 10,206 2,734 78.9% 21.1% Tonj N. 2011 21,830 16,903 4,927 77.4% 22.6% 2010 24,951 18,291 6,660 73.3% 26.7% 2009 14,954 12,144 2,810 81.2% 18.8% Tonj S. 2011 16,584 12,277 4,307 74.0% 26.0% 2010 22,986 18,061 4,925 78.6% 21.4% 2009 22,379 17,454 4,925 78.0% 22.0% Twic 2011 51,778 31,822 19,956 61.5% 38.5% 2010 48,215 30,254 17,961 62.7% 37.3% 2009 44,596 27,444 17,152 61.5% 38.5% Total 2011 151,718 104,802 46,916 69.1% 30.9% 2010 172,890 123,084 49,806 71.2% 28.8% 2009 160,031 113,385 46,646 70.9% 29.1%

0

50

100

150

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Tonj N. Tonj E. Gogrial E.

2009 2010 2011

Page 16: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

15

Number of primary school pupil enrolment by county, 2009-2011

4.2.3. Teachers

Number and % of primary school teachers, and pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and gender, 2009-2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % PTR Gogrial E. 2011 360 349 11 96.9% 3.1% 45.7 2010 378 363 15 96.0% 4.0% 45.2 2009 380 367 13 96.6% 3.4% 41.3 Gogrial W. 2011 936 860 76 91.9% 8.1% 38.1 2010 891 822 69 92.3% 7.7% 50.3 2009 911 835 76 91.7% 8.3% 54.3 Tonj E. 2011 182 180 2 98.9% 1.1% 52.0 2010 279 267 12 95.7% 4.3% 53.2 2009 373 345 28 92.5% 7.5% 34.7 Tonj N. 2011 494 471 23 95.3% 4.7% 44.2 2010 412 391 21 94.9% 5.1% 60.6 2009 383 371 12 96.9% 3.1% 39.0 Tonj S. 2011 300 280 20 93.3% 6.7% 55.3 2010 337 315 22 93.5% 6.5% 68.2 2009 383 366 17 95.6% 4.4% 58.4 Twic 2011 941 869 72 92.3% 7.7% 55.0 2010 880 817 63 92.8% 7.2% 54.8 2009 777 714 63 91.9% 8.1% 57.4 Total 2011 3,213 3,009 204 93.7% 6.3% 47.2 2010 3,177 2,975 202 93.6% 6.4% 54.4 2009 3,207 2,998 209 93.5% 6.5% 49.9

Number of primary school teachers by county, 2009-2011

Primary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county, 2009-2011

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj E.

2009 2010 2011

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E.

2009 2010 2011

0

20

40

60

80

Tonj S. Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj E. Total

2009 2010 2011

Page 17: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

16

4.2.4. Classrooms

Number of primary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county and type, 2009-2011 County Year Total Perm Semi-perm Open-air Other PCR Gogrial E. 2011 308 65 154 66 23 75.1 2010 388 72 173 91 52 69.7 2009 280 40 112 96 32 103.2 Gogrial W. 2011 688 139 200 291 58 105.1 2010 696 123 219 228 126 131.1 2009 699 101 373 186 39 104.4 Tonj E. 2011 173 21 80 42 30 93.6 2010 224 17 67 94 46 176.7 2009 174 5 77 76 16 157.8 Tonj N. 2011 398 54 147 180 17 108.6 2010 255 20 107 108 20 196.5 2009 253 23 111 90 29 111.6 Tonj S. 2011 324 86 34 180 24 138.2 2010 276 75 106 62 33 127.0 2009 294 68 65 137 24 168.3 Twic 2011 724 137 318 185 84 113.8 2010 631 88 288 181 74 128.2 2009 701 104 365 183 49 95.1 Total 2011 2,615 502 933 944 236 105.7 2010 2,470 395 960 764 351 127.6 2009 2,401 341 1,103 768 189 110.8 * “Other” includes roof-only, tent, and others. ** PCR only accounts for permanent and semi-permanent classrooms.

Number of primary school classrooms by county, 2009-2011

Primary school pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county, 2009-2011

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj E.

2009 2010 2011

0

50

100

150

200

250

Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N. Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Twic Total

2009 2010 2011

Page 18: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

17

4.3. Secondary school 4.3.1. Schools

Number and % of secondary schools by county and ownership type, 2009-2011 County Year Total Gov Non-gov Gov % Non-gov % Gogrial E. 2011 1 1 - 100.0% - 2010 1 1 - 100.0% - 2009 1 1 - 100.0% - Gogrial W. 2011 1 - 1 - 100.0% 2010 2 2 - 100.0% - 2009 1 1 - 100.0% - Tonj E. 2011 1 1 - 100.0% - 2010 - - - - - 2009 - - - - - Tonj N. 2011 1 1 - 100.0% - 2010 1 1 - 100.0% - 2009 - - - - - Tonj S. 2011 2 1 1 50.0% 50.0% 2010 3 - 3 - 100.0% 2009 2 2 - 100.0% - Twic 2011 1 1 - 100.0% - 2010 1 - 1 - 100.0% 2009 1 1 - 100.0% - Total 2011 7 5 2 71.4% 28.6% 2010 8 4 4 50.0% 50.0% 2009 5 5 - 100.0% -

4.3.2. Students

Number and % of secondary school students by county and gender, 2009-2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % Gogrial E. 2011 71 69 2 97.2% 2.8% 2010 24 24 - 100.0% - 2009 88 82 6 93.2% 6.8% Gogrial W. 2011 119 112 7 94.1% 5.9% 2010 648 609 39 94.0% 6.0% 2009 938 838 100 89.3% 10.7% Tonj E. 2011 36 35 1 97.2% 2.8% 2010 - - - - - 2009 - - - - - Tonj N. 2011 210 202 8 96.2% 3.8% 2010 280 252 28 90.0% 10.0% 2009 - - - - - Tonj S. 2011 237 216 21 91.1% 8.9% 2010 215 204 11 94.9% 5.1% 2009 147 139 8 94.6% 5.4% Twic 2011 334 259 75 77.5% 22.5% 2010 333 275 58 82.6% 17.4% 2009 173 146 27 84.4% 15.6% Total 2011 1,007 893 114 88.7% 11.3% 2010 1,500 1,364 136 90.9% 9.1% 2009 1,346 1,205 141 89.5% 10.5% * “Secondary school students” include only students in S1-S4. S5 and S6 students in schools following the Uganda and Kenyan secondary school system are excluded from the count.

Number of secondary school students by county, 2009-2011

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj N.

2009 2010 2011

Page 19: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

18

4.3.3. Teachers

Number and % of secondary school teachers and pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and gender, 2009-2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % PTR Gogrial E. 2011 10 10 - 100.0% - 7.1 2010 10 10 - 100.0% - 2.4 2009 11 11 - 100.0% - 8.0 Gogrial W. 2011 8 6 2 75.0% 25.0% 14.9 2010 30 28 2 93.3% 6.7% 21.6 2009 17 16 1 94.1% 5.9% 55.2 Tonj E. 2011 14 14 - 100.0% - 2.6 2010 - - - - - - 2009 - - - - - - Tonj N. 2011 14 14 - 100.0% - 15.0 2010 11 11 - 100.0% - 25.5 2009 - - - - - - Tonj S. 2011 20 19 1 95.0% 5.0% 11.9 2010 27 26 1 96.3% 3.7% 8.0 2009 16 15 1 93.8% 6.3% 9.2 Twic 2011 14 13 1 92.9% 7.1% 23.9 2010 15 15 - 100.0% - 22.2 2009 6 6 - 100.0% - 28.8 Total 2011 80 76 4 95.0% 5.0% 12.6 2010 93 90 3 96.8% 3.2% 16.1 2009 50 48 2 96.0% 4.0% 26.9

Number of secondary school teachers by county, 2009-2011

Secondary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county, 2009-2011

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Gogrial W. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Twic Tonj E. Tonj N.

2009 2010 2011

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj N. Total

2009 2010 2011

Page 20: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

19

4.3.4. Classrooms

Number of secondary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county and type, 2009-2011 County Year Total Perm Semi-perm Open-air Other PCR Gogrial E. 2011 - - - - - - 2010 3 - 3 - - 8.0 2009 4 4 - - - 22.0 Gogrial W. 2011 3 3 - - - 39.7 2010 28 16 - - 12 40.5 2009 10 10 - - - 93.8 Tonj E. 2011 4 4 - - - 9.0 2010 - - - - - - 2009 - - - - - - Tonj N. 2011 6 4 2 - - 35.0 2010 4 4 - - - 70.0 2009 - - - - - - Tonj S. 2011 15 15 - - - 15.8 2010 12 12 - - - 17.9 2009 8 6 - - 2 24.5 Twic 2011 5 5 - - - 66.8 2010 3 3 - - - 111.0 2009 4 4 - - - 43.3 Total 2011 33 31 2 - - 30.5 2010 50 35 3 - 12 39.5 2009 26 24 - - 2 56.1 * “Other” includes roof-only, tent, and others. ** PCR only accounts for permanent and semi-permanent classrooms.

Number of secondary school classrooms by county , 2009-2011

Secondary school pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county, 2009-2011

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Gogrial W. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Twic Tonj N.

2009 2010 2011

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj N.

2009 2010 2011

Page 21: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

20

4.4. Alternative Education System (AES) Centres 4.4.1. Centres

Number and % of AES centres by county and programme type, 2009-2011 County Year Total ALP Non-ALP ALP % Non-ALP % Gogrial E. 2011 11 11 - 100.0% - 2010 8 6 2 75.0% 25.0% 2009 6 5 1 83.3% 16.7% Gogrial W. 2011 7 7 - 100.0% - 2010 3 1 2 33.3% 66.7% 2009 15 10 5 66.7% 33.3% Tonj E. 2011 6 6 - 100.0% - 2010 6 3 3 50.0% 50.0% 2009 5 1 4 20.0% 80.0% Tonj N. 2011 5 5 - 100.0% - 2010 1 1 - 100.0% - 2009 2 2 - 100.0% - Tonj S. 2011 10 10 - 100.0% - 2010 4 2 2 50.0% 50.0% 2009 4 4 - 100.0% - Twic 2011 8 6 2 75.0% 25.0% 2010 12 7 5 58.3% 41.7% 2009 11 3 8 27.3% 72.7% Total 2011 47 45 2 95.7% 4.3% 2010 34 20 14 58.8% 41.2% 2009 43 25 18 58.1% 41.9%

Number of AES centres by county, 2009-2011

4.4.2. Students

Number and % of AES learners by county and gender, 2009-2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % Gogrial E. 2011 781 617 164 79.0% 21.0% 2010 1,122 587 535 52.3% 47.7% 2009 513 361 152 70.4% 29.6% Gogrial W. 2011 707 495 212 70.0% 30.0% 2010 463 262 201 56.6% 43.4% 2009 2,593 1,669 924 64.4% 35.6% Tonj E. 2011 727 458 269 63.0% 37.0% 2010 1,076 663 413 61.6% 38.4% 2009 513 395 118 77.0% 23.0% Tonj N. 2011 277 212 65 76.5% 23.5% 2010 325 188 137 57.8% 42.2% 2009 168 111 57 66.1% 33.9% Tonj S. 2011 1,404 927 477 66.0% 34.0% 2010 357 269 88 75.4% 24.6% 2009 379 243 136 64.1% 35.9% Twic 2011 1,241 757 484 61.0% 39.0% 2010 1,493 857 636 57.4% 42.6% 2009 1,140 630 510 55.3% 44.7% Total 2011 5,137 3,466 1,671 67.5% 32.5% 2010 4,836 2,826 2,010 58.4% 41.6% 2009 5,306 3,409 1,897 64.2% 35.8%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Gogrial W. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj S. Tonj N.

2009 2010 2011

Page 22: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

21

Number of AES learners by county, 2009-2011

4.4.3. Teachers

Number and % of AES teachers and pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and gender, 2009-2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % PTR Gogrial E. 2011 60 59 1 98.3% 1.7% 13.0 2010 54 52 2 96.3% 3.7% 20.8 2009 37 35 2 94.6% 5.4% 13.9 Gogrial W. 2011 39 37 2 94.9% 5.1% 18.1 2010 20 20 - 100.0% - 23.2 2009 98 95 3 96.9% 3.1% 26.5 Tonj E. 2011 21 21 - 100.0% - 34.6 2010 28 27 1 96.4% 3.6% 38.4 2009 20 19 1 95.0% 5.0% 25.7 Tonj N. 2011 22 20 2 90.9% 9.1% 12.6 2010 4 4 - 100.0% - 81.3 2009 7 7 - 100.0% - 24.0 Tonj S. 2011 45 43 2 95.6% 4.4% 31.2 2010 25 22 3 88.0% 12.0% 14.3 2009 25 25 - 100.0% - 15.2 Twic 2011 46 46 - 100.0% - 27.0 2010 58 55 3 94.8% 5.2% 25.7 2009 57 52 5 91.2% 8.8% 20.0 Total 2011 233 226 7 97.0% 3.0% 22.0 2010 189 180 9 95.2% 4.8% 25.6 2009 244 233 11 95.5% 4.5% 21.7

Number of AES teachers by county, 2009-2011

AES pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county, 2009-2011

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

Gogrial W. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj S. Tonj N.

2009 2010 2011

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Gogrial W. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N.

2009 2010 2011

0

20

40

60

80

100

Gogrial W. Tonj E. Tonj N. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Total

2009 2010 2011

Page 23: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

22

4.5. Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) 4.5.1. Centres

Number and % of TVET centres by county and ownership type, 2011 County Year Total Gov Non-gov Gov % Non-gov % Tonj N. 2011 1 1 - 100.0% - Total 2011 1 1 - 100.0% -

4.5.2. Trainees

Number and % of TVET centre trainees by county and gender, 2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % Tonj N. 2011 26 26 - 100.0% - Total 2011 26 26 - 100.0% -

4.5.3. Teachers/trainers

Number and % of TVET centre teachers/trainers and pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and gender, 2011 County Year Total Male Female Male % Female % PTR Tonj N. 2011 6 6 - 100.0% - 4.3 Total 2011 6 6 - 100.0% - 4.3

4.5.4. Programmes

Number of centres by county and course offered, 2011

Cou

nty

Yea

r

Agr

icu

ltu

re

Au

tom

otiv

e te

chn

olog

y

Car

pent

ry

Com

pute

r te

chn

olog

y

Hai

rdre

ssin

g

Mas

onry

/Con

stru

ctio

n

Tailo

rin

g/

Embr

oide

rin

g

Oth

er

Tonj N. 2011 1 - - - - - - - Total 2011 1 - - - - - - -

Page 24: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

23

5.0. PRE-PRIMARY SCHOOL, 2011 5.1. Access 5.1.1. Enrolment

Number of pre-primary school pupils by county and grade, 2011 County Total Baby/Infant Middle/Nursery Top/Graduate Gogrial E. 291 115 163 13 Gogrial W. 243 76 97 70 Tonj S. 148 93 - 55 Twic 697 368 309 20 Total 1,379 652 569 158

Number of pre-primary school pupils by grade and gender, 2011

% of pre-primary school pupils by grade and gender, 2011

Number of pre-primary pupils by county and gender, 2011

% of pre-primary pupils by county and gender, 2011

5.1.2. Overage pupils

Number and % of pre-primary school at-age and overage pupils by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female At age Overage % overage At age Overage % overage At age Overage % overage

Gogrial E. 42 249 85.6% 27 166 86.0% 15 83 84.7% Gogrial W. 146 97 39.9% 103 79 43.4% 43 18 29.5% Tonj S. - 148 100.0% - 79 100.0% - 69 100.0% Twic 268 429 61.5% 211 278 56.9% 57 151 72.6% Total 456 923 66.9% 341 602 63.8% 115 321 73.6% * “At age” includes under-age and at-age pupils.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Baby/Infant Middle/Nursery Top/Graduate

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Male Female

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Twic Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Tonj S.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial W.

Twic Gogrial E. Tonj S. Total

Male Female

Page 25: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

24

Number of pre-primary school overage pupils by county and gender, 2011

% of pre-primary school overage pupils by county and gender, 2011

Number and % of pre-primary school at-age and overage pupils by grade and gender, 2011

Grade Total Male Female At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage %

Baby/Infant 177 475 72.9% 127 302 70.4% 50 173 77.6% Middle/Nursery 181 388 68.2% 139 262 65.3% 42 126 75.0% Top/Graduate 98 60 38.0% 75 38 33.6% 23 22 48.9% Total 456 923 66.9% 341 602 63.8% 115 321 73.6% * “At age” includes under-age and at-age pupils.

% of pre-primary school overage pupils by grade and gender, 2011

5.2. Resources

5.2.1. Schools

Number of pre-primary schools by ownership, 2011

Ownership type Schools Community 1 Government 5 Private 2 Other 3 Total 11

* “Other” includes NGO-supported, unknown, and unspecified other ownership types.

No. and % of pre-primary schools with meals by county, 2011

County Schools Schools w/ meals Schools w/out meals

Count % total Count % total Gogrial E. 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0% Gogrial W. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj S. 1 1 100.0% - - Twic 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0% Total 11 6 54.5% 5 45.5%

* “Schools with meals” refers to schools that have reported to be receiving meals from an external entity. Remaining schools either do not receive meals from an external entity or did not respond.

% of pre-primary schools by ownership type, 2011

5.2.2. Teachers

Number and % of pre-primary school teachers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 28 25 89.3% 3 10.7% Gogrial W. 6 2 33.3% 4 66.7% Tonj S. 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0% Twic 14 12 85.7% 2 14.3% Total 52 42 80.8% 10 19.2%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Twic Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Tonj S.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W.

Total

Male Female

0% 25% 50% 75%

100%

Baby/Infant Middle/Nursery Top/Graduate Total

Male Female

Community

9.1%

Government

45.5% Private 18.2%

Other 27.3%

Page 26: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

25

Number of pre-primary school teachers by county and gender, 2011

% of pre-primary school teachers by county and gender, 2011

Number and % of pre-primary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

County Total Trained Untrained Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 28 3 10.7% 13 46.4% 12 42.9% Gogrial W. 6 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% Tonj S. 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0% - - Twic 14 2 14.3% 7 50.0% 5 35.7% Total 52 8 15.4% 25 48.1% 19 36.5% * “Trained” encompasses teachers with pre-service teacher training, in-service teacher training, and higher education diploma. “Unknown” teachers include those whose professional qualification was not reported.

Number of pre-primary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

% of pre-primary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

Number and % of pre-primary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

County Total Primary School Secondary School Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 28 24 85.7% 4 14.3% Gogrial W. 6 2 33.3% 4 66.7% Tonj S. 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0% Twic 14 12 85.7% 2 14.3% Total 52 39 75.0% 13 25.0% * “Primary school” includes completion of primary and intermediate/lower secondary education levels. “Secondary school” attainment includes completion of secondary, O-level, and/or A-level education levels. “University and above” attainment includes completion of four (4) years of university education or its equivalent.

Number of pre-primary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

% of pre-primary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Gogrial E. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial W.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial W.

Total

Male Female

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Gogrial E. Tonj S. Twic Gogrial W.

Trained Untrained Unknown

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Gogrial W.

Twic Gogrial E. Total

Trained Untrained Unknown

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S.

Primary school Secondary school

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W.

Tonj S. Total

Primary school Secondary school

Page 27: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

26

Number and % of pre-primary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

County Total Paid Volunteer Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 28 2 7.1% 11 39.3% 15 53.6% Gogrial W. 6 - - - - 6 100.0% Tonj S. 4 4 100.0% - - - - Twic 14 1 7.1% 12 85.7% 1 7.1% Total 52 7 13.5% 23 44.2% 22 42.3%

Number of pre-primary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

% of pre-primary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

Pre-primary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and ownership, 2011

County Overall Government Non-government Pupil Teacher PTR Pupil Teacher PTR Pupil Teacher PTR

Gogrial E. 291 28 10.4 41 16 2.6 250 12 20.8 Gogrial W. 243 6 40.5 243 6 40.5 - - - Tonj S. 148 4 37.0 - - - 148 4 37.0 Twic 697 14 49.8 255 6 42.5 442 8 55.3 Total 1,379 52 26.5 539 28 19.3 840 24 35.0

* “Non-government” here includes schools under community, private, NGO-supported, other, and unknown ownership.

Pre-primary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and ownership, 2011

5.2.3. Classrooms

Number of pre-primary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county and type, 2011 County Total Perm Semi-perm Open-air PCR Gogrial E. 23 7 15 1 13.2 Gogrial W. 1 1 - - 243.0 Tonj S. 4 4 - - 37.0 Twic 16 - 6 10 116.2 Total 44 12 21 11 41.8

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Tonj S. Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W.

Paid Volunteer Unknown

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W.

Total

Paid Volunteer Unknown

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Total

Government Non-government Overall

Page 28: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

27

% of pre-primary school classrooms by type, 2011

Pre-primary school pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county, 2011

Number of pre-primary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by ownership type, 2011 Ownership Total Perm Semi-perm Open-air PCR Gov. 31 8 21 2 18.6 Private 9 4 - 5 74.0 Other 4 - - 4 - Total 44 12 21 11 41.8

Pre-primary school pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by ownership, 2011

Number and % of pre-primary schools with permanent and semi-permanent classrooms, 2011

County Total With perm and semi-perm classrooms Without perm and semi-perm classrooms

Count % total Count % total Gogrial E. 5 2 40.0% 3 60.0% Gogrial W. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj S. 1 1 100.0% - - Twic 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0% Total 11 5 45.5% 6 54.5%

5.2.4. Curriculum and instruction

Number and % of pre-primary school by language of instruction and grade, 2011 Language Baby/Infant Nursery/Middle Top/Graduate English

1 2 2 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Total 1 2 2 5.2.5. Facilities

Number and % of pre-primary schools with and without access to drinking water by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 5 2 40.0% 3 60.0% Gogrial W. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj S. 1 1 100.0% - - Twic 4 - - 4 100.0% Total 11 4 36.4% 7 63.6%

Number and % of pre-primary schools with and without access to latrine by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 5 2 40.0% 3 60.0% Gogrial W. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj S. 1 1 100.0% - - Twic 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0% Total 11 5 45.5% 6 54.5%

Perm 27.3%

Semi-perm

47.7%

Open-air 25.0%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Total

0

20

40

60

80

Gov. Private Total

Page 29: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

28

6.0. PRIMARY SCHOOL, 2011 6.1. Access 6.1.1. Enrolment

Number of primary school pupils by county and grade, 2011 County Total P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Gogrial E. 16,452 6,299 3,472 2,618 1,921 987 608 324 223 Gogrial W. 35,616 12,073 6,380 4,991 4,283 3,069 2,299 1,447 1,074 Tonj E. 9,458 3,652 1,982 1,706 1,094 799 174 37 14 Tonj N. 21,830 8,075 5,426 3,836 2,274 1,146 693 281 99 Tonj S. 16,584 5,083 3,707 2,816 2,352 1,173 736 426 291 Twic 51,778 18,556 11,060 8,509 6,477 4,021 1,824 802 529 Total 151,718 53,738 32,027 24,476 18,401 11,195 6,334 3,317 2,230

Number of primary school pupils by grade and gender, 2011

% of primary school pupils by grade and gender, 2011

Number of primary school pupils by county and gender, 2011

% of primary school pupils by county and gender, 2011

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Total

Male Female

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Twic Total

Male Female

Page 30: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

29

6.1.2. Overage pupils

Number and % of primary school at-age and overage pupils by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage %

Gogrial E. 1,458 14,994 91.1% 988 10,982 91.7% 470 4,012 89.5% Gogrial W. 4,065 31,551 88.6% 2,489 21,812 89.8% 1,576 9,739 86.1% Tonj E. 866 8,592 90.8% 626 6,903 91.7% 240 1,689 87.6% Tonj N. 2,218 19,612 89.8% 1,655 15,248 90.2% 563 4,364 88.6% Tonj S. 2,658 13,926 84.0% 1,846 10,431 85.0% 812 3,495 81.1% Twic 7,750 44,028 85.0% 4,474 27,348 85.9% 3,276 16,680 83.6% Total 19,015 132,703 87.5% 12,078 92,724 88.5% 6,937 39,979 85.2% * “At age” includes under-age and at-age pupils.

Number of primary school at-age and overage pupils by county and gender, 2011

% of primary school at-age and overage pupils by county and gender, 2011

Number and % of primary school at-age and overage pupils by grade and gender, 2011

Grade Total Male Female At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage %

P1 10,985 42,753 79.6% 6,943 28,941 80.7% 4,042 13,812 77.4% P2 3,313 28,714 89.7% 2,031 19,634 90.6% 1,282 9,080 87.6% P3 1,947 22,529 92.0% 1,218 15,699 92.8% 729 6,830 90.4% P4 1,459 16,942 92.1% 942 12,027 92.7% 517 4,915 90.5% P5 759 10,436 93.2% 529 7,583 93.5% 230 2,853 92.5% P6 371 5,963 94.1% 281 4,563 94.2% 90 1,400 94.0% P7 118 3,199 96.4% 93 2,510 96.4% 25 689 96.5% P8 63 2,167 97.2% 41 1,767 97.7% 22 400 94.8% Total 19,015 132,703 87.5% 12,078 92,724 88.5% 6,937 39,979 85.2% * “At age” includes under-age and at-age pupils.

Number of primary school at-age and overage pupils by grade and gender, 2011

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Tonj N. Gogrial E. Tonj E.

At age Overage

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Tonj E. Gogrial E. Total

At age Overage

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

At age Overage

Page 31: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

30

% of primary school at-age and overage pupils by grade and gender, 2011

6.1.3. New entrants

Number and % of primary school new entrants with pre-primary education by county and gender, 2011

County

Total Male Female

New entrants

New entrants w/ pre-prim ed

New entrants w/ pre-

prim ed %

New entrants

New entrants w/ pre-prim ed

New entrants w/ pre-

prim ed %

New entrants

New entrants w/ pre-prim ed

New entrants w/ pre-

prim ed % Gogrial E. 4,651 380 8.2% 3,233 273 8.4% 1,418 107 7.5% Gogrial W. 8,296 791 9.5% 5,266 517 9.8% 3,030 274 9.0% Tonj E. 3,108 111 3.6% 2,414 63 2.6% 694 48 6.9% Tonj N. 5,532 122 2.2% 4,328 96 2.2% 1,204 26 2.2% Tonj S. 3,173 169 5.3% 2,196 104 4.7% 977 65 6.7% Twic 14,295 1,681 11.8% 8,495 931 11.0% 5,800 750 12.9% Total 39,055 3,254 8.3% 25,932 1,984 7.7% 13,123 1,270 9.7%

Number of primary school new entrants and new entrants with pre-primary education by county, 2011

% of primary school new entrants and new entrants with pre-primary education by county, 2011

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Total

At age Overage

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj E.

New entrants New entrants w/ pre-prim ed

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N. Total

Male Female Total

Page 32: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

31

6.1.4. Pupils with special needs

Number and % of primary school pupils with special needs by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female

All pupils Spec needs pupils

Special needs % All pupils Spec needs

pupils Special

needs % All pupils Spec needs pupils

Special needs %

Gogrial E. 16,452 255 1.5% 11,970 182 1.5% 4,482 73 1.6% Gogrial W. 35,616 497 1.4% 24,301 351 1.4% 11,315 146 1.3% Tonj E. 9,458 77 0.8% 7,529 63 0.8% 1,929 14 0.7% Tonj N. 21,830 177 0.8% 16,903 118 0.7% 4,927 59 1.2% Tonj S. 16,584 130 0.8% 12,277 91 0.7% 4,307 39 0.9% Twic 51,778 778 1.5% 31,822 473 1.5% 19,956 305 1.5% Total 151,718 1,914 1.2% 104,802 1,278 1.2% 46,916 636 1.3%

Number of primary school pupils with special needs by county and gender, 2011

Number of primary school pupils with special needs by type and gender, 2011

* “Poor vision” includes pupils whose eye visions require glasses but do not have access to them.

Number and % of primary school demobilised soldiers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female

All pupils Demob soldiers

Demob. soldiers % All pupils Demob

soldiers Demob.

soldiers % All pupils Demob soldiers

Demob. soldiers %

Gogrial E. 16,452 112 0.7% 11,970 85 0.7% 4,482 27 0.6% Gogrial W. 35,616 111 0.3% 24,301 109 0.4% 11,315 2 0.0% Tonj E. 9,458 80 0.8% 7,529 70 0.9% 1,929 10 0.5% Tonj N. 21,830 67 0.3% 16,903 54 0.3% 4,927 13 0.3% Tonj S. 16,584 60 0.4% 12,277 49 0.4% 4,307 11 0.3% Twic 51,778 656 1.3% 31,822 473 1.5% 19,956 183 0.9% Total 151,718 1,086 0.7% 104,802 840 0.8% 46,916 246 0.5%

Number of primary school demobilised soldiers by county, 2011

0

100

200

300

400

500

Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Tonj E.

Male Female

0

100

200

300

400

500

Poor vision Learning disability Partial deafness Physical impairment Complete deafness Complete blindness

Male Female

0

100

200

300

400

500

Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj N. Tonj S.

Male Female

Page 33: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

32

Number and % of primary school demobilised soldiers by grade and gender, 2011

Grade Total Male Female

All pupils Demob soldiers

Demob. soldiers % All pupils Demob

soldiers Demob.

soldiers % All pupils Demob soldiers

Demob. soldiers %

P1 53,738 198 0.4% 35,884 131 0.4% 17,854 67 0.4% P2 32,027 146 0.5% 21,665 102 0.5% 10,362 44 0.4% P3 24,476 176 0.7% 16,917 124 0.7% 7,559 52 0.7% P4 18,401 186 1.0% 12,969 145 1.1% 5,432 41 0.7% P5 11,195 183 1.6% 8,112 148 1.8% 3,083 35 1.1% P6 6,334 94 1.5% 4,844 89 1.8% 1,490 5 0.3% P7 3,317 65 1.9% 2,603 64 2.4% 714 1 0.1% P8 2,230 38 1.7% 1,808 37 2.0% 422 1 0.2% Total 151,718 1,086 0.7% 104,802 840 0.8% 46,916 246 0.5%

Number of primary school demobilised soldiers by grade, 2011

Number and % of primary school orphans by county and type, 2011

County Enrolment Total Single parent No parent Count % enrolment Count % enrolment Count % enrolment

Gogrial E. 16,452 2,333 14.2% 1,839 11.2% 494 3.0% Gogrial W. 35,616 3,583 10.1% 2,803 7.9% 780 2.2% Tonj E. 9,458 650 6.9% 514 5.4% 136 1.4% Tonj N. 21,830 2,205 10.1% 1,775 8.1% 430 2.0% Tonj S. 16,584 1,053 6.3% 817 4.9% 236 1.4% Twic 51,778 5,573 10.8% 4,221 8.2% 1,352 2.6% Total 151,718 15,397 10.1% 11,969 7.9% 3,428 2.3%

Number of primary school orphans by county and type, 2011

% of primary school orphans by county and type, 2011

0

50

100

150

200

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

Male Female

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Tonj E.

Single parent No parent

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Gogrial E. Twic Tonj N. Gogrial W. Tonj E. Tonj S. Total

Single parent No parent

Page 34: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

33

Number and % of primary school orphans by grade and type, 2011

County Enrolment Total Single parent No parent Count % enrolment Count % enrolment Count % enrolment

P1 53,738 4,991 9.3% 3,845 7.2% 1,146 2.1% P2 32,027 3,155 9.9% 2,493 7.8% 662 2.1% P3 24,476 2,547 10.4% 1,950 8.0% 597 2.4% P4 18,401 2,005 10.9% 1,544 8.4% 461 2.5% P5 11,195 1,254 11.2% 958 8.6% 296 2.6% P6 6,334 758 12.0% 612 9.7% 146 2.3% P7 3,317 427 12.9% 353 10.6% 74 2.2% P8 2,230 260 11.7% 214 9.6% 46 2.1% Total 151,718 15,397 10.1% 11,969 7.9% 3,428 2.3%

Number of primary school orphans by grade and type, 2011

% of primary school orphans by grade and type, 2011

6.2. Resources 6.2.1. Schools

Number of primary schools by ownership, 2011 Ownership type Schools Community 87 Government 300 Government-aided 11 Private 8 Other 12 Total 418

* “Other” includes NGO-supported, unknown, and unspecified other ownership types.

No. and % of prim. schools with meals by county, 2011

County Schools Schools w/ meals Schools w/out meals Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 50 26 52.0% 24 48.0% Gogrial W. 97 40 41.2% 57 58.8% Tonj E. 36 2 5.6% 34 94.4% Tonj N. 75 13 17.3% 62 82.7% Tonj S. 49 16 32.7% 33 67.3% Twic 111 50 45.0% 61 55.0% Total 418 147 35.2% 271 64.8%

* “Schools with meals” refers to schools that have reported to be receiving meals from an external entity. Remaining schools either do not receive meals from an external entity or did not respond..

% of primary schools by ownership type, 2011

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

Single Parent No Parent

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Total

Single Parent No Parent

Comm 20.8%

Gov 71.8%

Gov-aided 2.6%

Private 1.9%

Other 2.9%

Page 35: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

34

Number of primary schools with and without meals by county, 2011

% of primary schools with and without meals by county, 2011

6.2.2. Teachers

Number and % of primary school teachers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 360 349 96.9% 11 3.1% Gogrial W. 936 860 91.9% 76 8.1% Tonj E. 182 180 98.9% 2 1.1% Tonj N. 494 471 95.3% 23 4.7% Tonj S. 300 280 93.3% 20 6.7% Twic 941 869 92.3% 72 7.7% Total 3,213 3,009 93.7% 204 6.3%

Number of primary schools teachers by county and gender, 2011

% of primary schools teachers by county and gender, 2011

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj N. Tonj E.

Schools with meals Schools without meals

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Tonj N. Tonj E. Total

Schools with meals Schools without meals

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj E.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj E. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Twic Gogrial W. Total

Male Female

Page 36: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

35

Number and % of primary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

County Total Trained Untrained Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 360 139 38.6% 157 43.6% 64 17.8% Gogrial W. 936 405 43.3% 276 29.5% 255 27.2% Tonj E. 182 64 35.2% 84 46.2% 34 18.7% Tonj N. 494 230 46.6% 153 31.0% 111 22.5% Tonj S. 300 171 57.0% 79 26.3% 50 16.7% Twic 941 389 41.3% 280 29.8% 272 28.9% Total 3,213 1,398 43.5% 1,029 32.0% 786 24.5% * “Trained” encompasses teachers with pre-service teacher training, in-service teacher training, and higher education diploma. “Unknown” teachers include those whose professional qualification was not reported.

Number of primary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

% of primary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

Number and % of primary school teachers by county and qualification type, 2011

County Total Untrained In-service Pre-service Diploma Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 360 157 43.6% 87 24.2% 33 9.2% 19 5.3% 64 17.8% Gogrial W. 936 276 29.5% 295 31.5% 87 9.3% 23 2.5% 255 27.2% Tonj E. 182 84 46.2% 50 27.5% 9 4.9% 5 2.7% 34 18.7% Tonj N. 494 153 31.0% 146 29.6% 72 14.6% 12 2.4% 111 22.5% Tonj S. 300 79 26.3% 132 44.0% 25 8.3% 14 4.7% 50 16.7% Twic 941 280 29.8% 207 22.0% 131 13.9% 51 5.4% 272 28.9% Total 3,213 1,029 32.0% 917 28.5% 357 11.1% 124 3.9% 786 24.5%

Number of primary school teachers by professional qualification and gender, 2011

% of primary school teachers by professional qualification, 2011

0

100

200

300

400

500

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E. Trained Untrained Unknown

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Tonj N. Gogrial W. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj E. Total

Trained Untrained Unknown

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Untrained In-service Unknown Pre-service Diploma

Male Female

Untrained 32.0%

In-service 28.5%

Pre-service 11.1%

Diploma 3.9%

Unknown 24.5%

Page 37: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

36

Number and % of primary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

County Total Primary School Secondary School University and above Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 360 219 60.8% 134 37.2% 7 1.9% Gogrial W. 936 572 61.1% 354 37.8% 10 1.1% Tonj E. 182 138 75.8% 43 23.6% 1 0.5% Tonj N. 494 343 69.4% 148 30.0% 3 0.6% Tonj S. 300 197 65.7% 97 32.3% 6 2.0% Twic 941 543 57.7% 386 41.0% 12 1.3% Total 3,213 2,012 62.6% 1,162 36.2% 39 1.2% * “Primary school” includes completion of primary and intermediate/lower secondary education levels. “Secondary school” attainment includes completion of secondary, O-level, and/or A-level education levels. “University and above” attainment includes completion of four (4) years of university education or its equivalent.

Number of primary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

% of primary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

Number and % of primary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

County Total Paid Volunteer Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 360 186 51.7% 174 48.3% Gogrial W. 936 560 59.8% 376 40.2% Tonj E. 182 116 63.7% 66 36.3% Tonj N. 494 242 49.0% 252 51.0% Tonj S. 300 228 76.0% 72 24.0% Twic 941 399 42.4% 542 57.6% Total 3,213 1,731 53.9% 1,482 46.1%

Number of primary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj N. Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj E.

Primary School Secondary School Univeristy and above

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Twic Total

Primary School Secondary School Univeristy and above

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E.

Paid Volunteer

Page 38: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

37

% of primary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

Primary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and ownership, 2011

County Overall Government Non-government Pupil Teacher PTR Pupil Teacher PTR Pupil Teacher PTR

Gogrial E. 16,452 360 45.7 13,761 300 45.9 2,691 60 44.9 Gogrial W. 35,616 936 38.1 31,283 788 39.7 4,333 148 29.3 Tonj E. 9,458 182 52.0 8,088 152 53.2 1,370 30 45.7 Tonj N. 21,830 494 44.2 14,491 330 43.9 7,339 164 44.8 Tonj S. 16,584 300 55.3 12,965 227 57.1 3,619 73 49.6 Twic 51,778 941 55.0 40,616 720 56.4 11,162 221 50.5 Total 151,718 3,213 47.2 121,204 2,517 48.2 30,514 696 43.8

* “Non-government” here includes schools under community, private, NGO-supported, other, and unknown ownership.

Primary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and ownership, 2011

6.2.3. Classrooms

Number of primary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county and type, 2011 County Total Perm Semi-perm Open-air Roof only Other PCR Gogrial E. 308 65 154 66 23 - 75.1 Gogrial W. 688 139 200 291 57 1 105.1 Tonj E. 173 21 80 42 30 - 93.6 Tonj N. 398 54 147 180 17 - 108.6 Tonj S. 324 86 34 180 23 1 138.2 Twic 724 137 318 185 76 8 113.8 Total 2,615 502 933 944 226 10 105.7

% of primary school classrooms by type, 2011

Primary school pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county, 2011

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Tonj E. Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Twic Total

Paid Volunteer

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Tonj S. Twic Tonj E. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Gogrial W. Total

Government Non-government Overall

Perm 19.2%

Semi-perm

35.7%

Open-air 36.1%

Roof only 8.6%

Other 0.4%

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Tonj S. Twic Tonj N. Gogrial W.

Tonj E. Gogrial E. Total

Page 39: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

38

Number of primary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by ownership type, 2011 Ownership Total Perm Semi-perm Open-air Roof only Other PCR Community 410 22 182 163 43 - 107.5 Gov.-aided 96 41 25 28 1 1 77.5 Government 1,992 400 689 725 169 9 106.6 NGO-supported 25 12 - 8 5 - 200.5 Private 48 19 13 8 8 - 103.8 Other 44 8 24 12 - - 89.5 Total 2,615 502 933 944 226 10 105.7

Primary school pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by ownership, 2011

Number and % of primary schools with permanent and semi-permanent classrooms, 2011

County Total With perm and semi-perm classrooms Without perm and semi-perm classrooms

Count % total Count % total Gogrial E. 50 36 72.0% 14 28.0% Gogrial W. 97 63 64.9% 34 35.1% Tonj E. 36 22 61.1% 14 38.9% Tonj N. 75 43 57.3% 32 42.7% Tonj S. 49 17 34.7% 32 65.3% Twic 111 87 78.4% 24 21.6% Total 418 268 64.1% 150 35.9%

Number of primary schools with and without perm. and semi-perm. classrooms by county, 2011

% of primary schools with and without permanent and semi-permanent classrooms by county, 2011

Number and % of primary schools with and without multi-shift by county, 2011

County Total Single-shift Multi-shift

Count % total Count % total Gogrial E. 50 41 82.0% 9 18.0% Gogrial W. 97 89 91.8% 8 8.2% Tonj E. 36 28 77.8% 8 22.2% Tonj N. 75 73 97.3% 2 2.7% Tonj S. 49 47 95.9% 2 4.1% Twic 111 92 82.9% 19 17.1% Total 418 370 88.5% 48 11.5%

0

100

200

300

NGO-supported Community Government Private Other Gov.-aided Total

0

20

40

60

80

100

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj S.

With perm and semi-perm classrooms Without perm and semi-perm classrooms

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Twic Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Tonj E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Total

With perm and semi-perm classrooms Without perm and semi-perm classrooms

Page 40: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

39

Number of primary schools with and without multi-shift by county, 2011

% of primary schools with and without multi-shift by county, 2011

6.2.4. Curriculum and instruction

Primary school pupil-textbook ratio (PTextR) by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

County Enrolment English textbooks Math textbooks

Count PTextR Count PTextR Gogrial E. 16,452 1,793 9.2 2,037 8.1 Gogrial W. 35,616 6,396 5.6 7,094 5.0 Tonj E. 9,458 1,967 4.8 2,169 4.4 Tonj N. 21,830 3,347 6.5 3,044 7.2 Tonj S. 16,584 1,673 9.9 1,808 9.2 Twic 51,778 3,250 15.9 3,095 16.7 Total 151,718 18,426 8.2 19,247 7.9

Primary school pupil-textbook ratio (PtextR) by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

Primary school pupil-textbook ratio (PTextR) by grade and subject (English and Math), 2011

Grade Enrolment English textbooks Math textbooks

Count PTextR Count PTextR P1 53,738 4,338 12.4 5,063 10.6 P2 32,027 3,818 8.4 4,001 8.0 P3 24,476 2,910 8.4 3,070 8.0 P4 18,401 2,666 6.9 2,453 7.5 P5 11,195 2,109 5.3 2,094 5.3 P6 6,334 1,277 5.0 1,334 4.7 P7 3,317 751 4.4 689 4.8 P8 2,230 557 4.0 543 4.1 Total 151,718 18,426 8.2 19,247 7.9

0

20

40

60

80

100

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E.

Single-shift Multi-shift

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial W. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj E. Total

Single-shift Multi-shift

0

5

10

15

20

Twic Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Gogrial W. Tonj E. Total

English Math

Page 41: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

40

Primary school pupil-textbook ratio (PTextR) by grade and subject (English and Math), 2011

Number of primary schools by language of instruction and grade, 2011 Language P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 English

155 175 239 343 262 170 87 51 37.7% 42.6% 60.1% 96.1% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Arabic

2 2 1 - - - - - 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% - - - - -

Other

254 234 158 14 1 - - - 61.8% 56.9% 39.7% 3.9% 0.4% - - -

Total 411 411 398 357 263 170 87 51 * This section only counted the schools who responded to this question. Those who did not respond were not accounted for. ** Not all primary schools offer P1-P8; the grade levels served vary across schools. Some schools serve P1-P4, some serve P5-P8, some serve only P1, etc.

Number of primary school by language of instruction and grade, 2011

% of primary school by language of instruction and grade, 2011

Number and % of primary school by curriculum and grade, 2011 Curriculum P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 South Sudan

413 412 399 359 267 166 86 49 98.8% 99.3% 99.3% 98.9% 98.9% 98.2% 97.7% 98.0%

Kenya

2 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.8% 0.7% 1.8% 2.3% 2.0%

Sudan

2 1 1 1 1 - - - 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% - - -

Other

1 - - - - - - - 0.2% - - - - - - -

Total 418 415 402 363 270 169 88 50 * This section only counts the schools who responded to this question. Those who did not respond were not accounted for. ** Not all primary schools offer P1-P8; the grade levels served vary across schools. Some schools serve P1-P4, some serve P5-P8, some serve only P1, etc.

0

5

10

15

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Total

English Math

0

100

200

300

400

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

English Arabic Other

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Total

English Arabic Other

Page 42: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

41

Number of primary school by curriculum and grade, 2011

% of primary school by curriculum and grade, 2011

6.2.5. Facilities

Number and % of primary schools with and without access to drinking water by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 50 30 60.0% 20 40.0% Gogrial W. 97 48 49.5% 49 50.5% Tonj E. 36 4 11.1% 32 88.9% Tonj N. 75 24 32.0% 51 68.0% Tonj S. 49 21 42.9% 28 57.1% Twic 111 51 45.9% 60 54.1% Total 418 178 42.6% 240 57.4%

Number of primary schools with access to drinking water by county, 2011

% of primary schools with access to drinking water by county, 2011

0

100

200

300

400

500

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8

South Sudan Sudan Other

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Total

South Sudan Sudan Other

0

20

40

60

80

Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Tonj E.

Access No access

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Tonj N. Tonj E. Total

Access No access

Page 43: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

42

Number and % of primary schools with and without access to latrine by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 50 20 40.0% 30 60.0% Gogrial W. 97 50 51.5% 47 48.5% Tonj E. 36 8 22.2% 28 77.8% Tonj N. 75 24 32.0% 51 68.0% Tonj S. 49 23 46.9% 26 53.1% Twic 111 67 60.4% 44 39.6% Total 418 192 45.9% 226 54.1%

Number of primary schools with access to latrine by county, 2011

% of primary schools with access to latrine by county, 2011

Number and % of primary schools with and without access to electricity by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 50 - - 50 100.0% Gogrial W. 97 2 2.1% 95 97.9% Tonj E. 36 - - 36 100.0% Tonj N. 75 - - 75 100.0% Tonj S. 49 - - 49 100.0% Twic 111 - - 111 100.0% Total 418 2 0.5% 416 99.5%

Number and % of primary schools with and without access to health centre by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 50 3 6.0% 47 94.0% Gogrial W. 97 8 8.2% 89 91.8% Tonj E. 36 1 2.8% 35 97.2% Tonj N. 75 1 1.3% 74 98.7% Tonj S. 49 2 4.1% 47 95.9% Twic 111 8 7.2% 103 92.8% Total 418 23 5.5% 395 94.5%

Number of primary schools with access to health centre by county, 2011

0

20

40

60

80

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E.

Access No access

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Tonj E. Total

Access No access

0

50

100

150

Gogrial W. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N.

Access No access

Page 44: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

43

% of primary schools with access to health centre by county, 2011

6.3. Student flow 6.3.1. Promotion rate

Primary school promotion rate by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8 Gogrial E. 50.6% 66.8% 64.5% 51.2% 53.8% 54.0% 50.5% Gogrial W. 40.8% 52.3% 60.7% 53.5% 51.4% 44.5% 50.3% Tonj E. 38.8% 39.0% 39.3% 49.5% 16.5% 8.7% 7.5% Tonj N. 68.2% 66.7% 42.7% 35.6% 30.0% 22.5% 14.8% Tonj S. 54.2% 55.1% 52.1% 32.0% 32.2% 45.8% 75.3% Twic 54.0% 73.8% 73.8% 65.8% 47.8% 54.9% 113.7% Average 50.9% 60.7% 58.4% 50.1% 41.9% 41.8% 51.9%

* Promotion exceeding 100% occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

Primary school promotion rate for male pupils by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8 Gogrial E. 51.7% 69.3% 66.6% 50.9% 56.7% 55.7% 51.8% Gogrial W. 39.7% 50.2% 60.5% 52.9% 51.7% 45.7% 48.8% Tonj E. 42.6% 38.4% 38.4% 45.5% 16.3% 7.3% 7.2% Tonj N. 66.8% 71.6% 48.7% 37.7% 36.8% 26.3% 20.2% Tonj S. 52.4% 52.5% 49.5% 33.6% 32.4% 51.7% 76.1% Twic 54.4% 76.1% 75.3% 66.2% 47.6% 53.1% 111.1% Average 51.0% 60.5% 58.6% 49.4% 42.9% 43.3% 52.7%

* Promotion exceeding 100% occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

Primary school promotion rate for female pupils by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8 Gogrial E. 47.9% 60.7% 58.3% 52.7% 39.6% 44.4% 40.0% Gogrial W. 43.1% 57.1% 61.1% 55.2% 50.6% 41.1% 56.4% Tonj E. 26.7% 41.5% 43.4% 67.9% 17.3% 19.1% 10.5% Tonj N. 72.7% 53.0% 28.7% 28.6% 15.4% 13.5% 4.0% Tonj S. 59.7% 63.5% 61.2% 25.5% 31.2% 17.4% 67.6% Twic 53.2% 70.3% 71.1% 65.2% 48.1% 59.8% 122.8% Average 50.9% 61.3% 57.7% 52.0% 39.0% 37.1% 48.8%

* Promotion exceeding 100% occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

Primary school promotion rate by grade and gender, 2010-2011

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial W. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N. Total

Access No access

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8

Male Female Average

Page 45: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

44

6.3.2. Repetition rate

Primary school repetition rate by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Gogrial E. 12.2% 6.4% 5.8% 4.2% 5.9% 2.2% 1.6% - Gogrial W. 14.1% 6.8% 7.6% 5.6% 4.0% 4.9% 3.8% 13.1% Tonj E. 4.1% 3.2% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 1.9% 0.5% - Tonj N. 17.1% 7.2% 5.4% 5.2% 3.2% 2.6% 1.2% - Tonj S. 24.8% 3.8% 2.9% 2.4% 1.9% 2.7% 3.4% 2.3% Twic 15.4% 10.5% 9.4% 10.0% 9.1% 10.4% 9.5% 5.9% Average 15.1% 7.1% 6.4% 5.8% 4.8% 4.9% 3.6% 7.8%

Primary school repetition rate for male pupils by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Gogrial E. 11.6% 5.8% 5.4% 3.1% 5.7% 1.6% 1.8% - Gogrial W. 13.0% 6.5% 6.9% 5.5% 3.5% 5.0% 3.9% 12.6% Tonj E. 4.1% 2.8% 2.2% 1.8% 2.2% 1.4% 0.6% - Tonj N. 16.7% 6.2% 4.9% 5.4% 2.9% 2.2% 1.1% - Tonj S. 22.9% 2.5% 2.5% 1.6% 1.5% 2.0% 2.9% 1.9% Twic 13.9% 9.2% 7.7% 8.6% 7.2% 9.3% 6.6% 5.9% Average 14.0% 6.0% 5.4% 5.0% 4.0% 4.4% 3.3% 7.5% Primary school repetition rate for female pupils by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 Gogrial E. 13.6% 8.0% 7.2% 8.7% 7.0% 5.6% - - Gogrial W. 16.4% 7.6% 9.1% 6.0% 5.2% 4.8% 3.3% 16.5% Tonj E. 4.2% 5.0% 4.8% 6.1% 5.5% 6.4% - - Tonj N. 18.6% 10.0% 6.4% 4.2% 3.7% 3.3% 1.3% - Tonj S. 30.8% 8.2% 4.3% 5.7% 3.6% 5.8% 8.1% 12.5% Twic 17.6% 12.6% 12.2% 12.7% 13.5% 13.3% 19.8% 6.0% Average 17.3% 9.6% 8.8% 8.3% 7.3% 6.4% 4.8% 9.7%

Primary school repetition rate by grade and gender, 2010-2011

6.3.3. Dropout rate

Primary school dropout rate by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8 Gogrial E. 37.3% 26.7% 29.7% 44.6% 40.3% 43.8% 48.0% Gogrial W. 45.2% 40.9% 31.7% 40.8% 44.6% 50.6% 45.9% Tonj E. 57.1% 57.8% 58.0% 48.0% 81.0% 89.4% 91.9% Tonj N. 14.7% 26.1% 52.0% 59.3% 66.9% 75.0% 84.0% Tonj S. 21.0% 41.1% 45.0% 65.6% 65.9% 51.6% 21.3% Twic 30.7% 15.7% 16.9% 24.2% 43.1% 34.7% -23.3% Average 34.0% 32.2% 35.2% 44.1% 53.3% 53.3% 44.5%

* Negative dropout rates occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

Primary school dropout rate for male pupils by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8 Gogrial E. 36.7% 24.9% 28.0% 46.0% 37.6% 42.7% 46.4% Gogrial W. 47.4% 43.3% 32.6% 41.5% 44.8% 49.3% 47.3% Tonj E. 53.2% 58.9% 59.4% 52.7% 81.5% 91.3% 92.2% Tonj N. 16.5% 22.2% 46.3% 56.9% 60.3% 71.5% 78.7% Tonj S. 24.6% 45.0% 48.0% 64.8% 66.0% 46.3% 21.0% Twic 31.7% 14.7% 17.0% 25.2% 45.2% 37.6% -17.7% Average 35.0% 33.5% 36.0% 45.6% 53.1% 52.3% 44.0%

* Negative dropout rates occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7

Male Female Average

Page 46: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

45

Primary school dropout rate for female pupils by county and grade, 2010-2011 County P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8 Gogrial E. 38.5% 31.3% 34.6% 38.6% 53.5% 50.0% 60.0% Gogrial W. 40.5% 35.3% 29.8% 38.9% 44.2% 54.1% 40.3% Tonj E. 69.1% 53.5% 51.9% 26.1% 77.2% 74.5% 89.5% Tonj N. 8.8% 37.0% 64.9% 67.1% 80.9% 83.1% 94.6% Tonj S. 9.5% 28.3% 34.5% 68.7% 65.2% 76.8% 24.3% Twic 29.1% 17.2% 16.7% 22.1% 38.5% 26.9% -42.6% Average 31.9% 29.0% 33.5% 39.7% 53.7% 56.5% 46.5%

* Negative dropout rates occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

Primary school dropout rate by grade and gender, 2010-2011

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

P1-P2 P2-P3 P3-P4 P4-P5 P5-P6 P6-P7 P7-P8

Male Female Average

Page 47: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

46

7.0. SECONDARY SCHOOL, 2011 7.1. Access 7.1.1. Enrolment

Number of secondary school students by county and grade, 2011 County Total S1 S2 S3 Gogrial E. 71 38 23 10 Gogrial W. 119 60 35 24 Tonj E. 36 31 5 - Tonj N. 210 83 67 60 Tonj S. 237 106 77 54 Twic 334 172 97 65 Total 1,007 490 304 213

Number of secondary school students by grade and gender, 2011

% of secondary school students by grade and gender, 2011

Number of secondary school students by county and gender, 2011

% of secondary school students by county and gender, 2011

7.1.2. Overage pupils

Number and % of secondary school at-age and overage students by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage %

Gogrial E. 11 60 84.5% 11 58 84.1% - 2 100.0% Gogrial W. - 119 100.0% - 112 100.0% - 7 100.0% Tonj E. - 36 100.0% - 35 100.0% - 1 100.0% Tonj N. 2 208 99.0% 2 200 99.0% - 8 100.0% Tonj S. 2 235 99.2% 1 215 99.5% 1 20 95.2% Twic - 334 100.0% - 259 100.0% - 75 100.0% Total 15 992 98.5% 14 879 98.4% 1 113 99.1% * “At age” includes under-age and at-age pupils.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

S1 S2 S3

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

S1 S2 S3 Total

Male Female

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Twic Tonj S. Tonj N. Gogrial W.

Gogrial E.

Tonj E.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj E. Gogrial E.

Tonj N. Gogrial W.

Tonj S. Twic Total

Male Female

Page 48: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

47

Number of secondary school at-age and overage students by county, 2011

% of secondary school at-age and overage students by county, 2011

Number and % of secondary school at-age and overage students by grade and gender, 2011

Grade Total Male Female At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage % At age Overage Overage %

S1 5 485 99.0% 5 426 98.8% 0 59 100.0% S2 6 298 98.0% 6 258 97.7% 0 40 100.0% S3 4 209 98.1% 3 195 98.5% 1 14 93.3% Total 15 992 98.5% 14 879 98.4% 1 113 99.1% * “At age” includes under-age and at-age pupils.

Number of secondary school at-age and overage students by grade, 2011

% of secondary school at-age and overage students by grade and gender, 2011

7.1.3. Students with special needs

Number and % of secondary school students with special needs by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female

All pupils

Spec needs pupils

Special needs % All pupils Spec needs

pupils Special

needs % All pupils Spec needs pupils

Special needs %

Gogrial E. 71 - - 69 - - 2 - - Gogrial W. 119 2 1.7% 112 2 1.8% 7 - - Tonj E. 36 - - 35 - - 1 - - Tonj N. 210 3 1.4% 202 3 1.5% 8 - - Tonj S. 237 2 0.8% 216 2 0.9% 21 - - Twic 334 2 0.6% 259 2 0.8% 75 - - Total 1,007 9 0.9% 893 9 1.0% 114 - -

Number and % of secondary school orphans by county and type, 2011

County Enrolment Total Single parent No parent Count % enrolment Count % enrolment Count % enrolment

Gogrial E. 71 26 36.6% 19 26.8% 7 9.9% Gogrial W. 119 28 23.5% 21 17.6% 7 5.9% Tonj E. 36 - - - - - - Tonj N. 210 72 34.3% 49 23.3% 23 11.0% Tonj S. 237 90 38.0% 87 36.7% 3 1.3% Twic 334 147 44.0% 87 26.0% 60 18.0% Total 1,007 363 36.0% 263 26.1% 100 9.9%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Gogrial E.

Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial W.

Tonj E. Twic

At age Overage

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E.

Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial W.

Tonj E. Twic Total

At age Overage

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

S1 S2 S3

At age Overage

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

S1 S2 S3 S4 Total

At age Overage

Page 49: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

48

Number of secondary school orphans by county and type, 2011

% of secondary school orphans by county and type, 2011

Number and % of secondary school orphans by grade and type, 2011

County Enrolment Total Single parent No parent Count % enrolment Count % enrolment Count % enrolment

S1 490 155 31.6% 122 24.9% 33 6.7% S2 304 115 37.8% 76 25.0% 39 12.8% S3 213 93 43.7% 65 30.5% 28 13.1% Total 1,007 363 36.0% 263 26.1% 100 9.9%

Number of secondary school orphans by grade and type, 2011

% of secondary school orphans by grade and type, 2011

7.2. Resources 7.2.1. Schools

Number of secondary schools by ownership, 2011 Ownership type Schools Community 1 Government 4 Government-aided 1 Private 1 Other 0 Total 7

* “Other” includes NGO-supported, unknown, and unspecified other ownership types.

% of sec. schools by ownership type, 2011

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Tonj S. Twic Tonj N. Gogrial W.

Gogrial E.

Single parent No parent

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Gogrial E.

Twic Tonj N. Gogrial W.

Total

Single parent No parent

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

S1 S2 S3

Single Parent No Parent

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

S1 S2 S3 Total

Single Parent No Parent

Community 14.3%

Government 57.1%

Government-aided 14.3%

Private 14.3%

Page 50: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

49

7.2.2. Teachers

Number and % of secondary school teachers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 10 10 100.0% - - Gogrial W. 8 6 75.0% 2 25.0% Tonj E. 14 14 100.0% - - Tonj N. 14 14 100.0% - - Tonj S. 20 19 95.0% 1 5.0% Twic 14 13 92.9% 1 7.1% Total 80 76 95.0% 4 5.0%

Number of secondary schools teachers by county and gender, 2011

% of secondary schools teachers by county and gender, 2011

Number and % of secondary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

County Total Trained Untrained Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 10 10 100.0% - - - - Gogrial W. 8 8 100.0% - - - - Tonj E. 14 3 21.4% 1 7.1% 10 71.4% Tonj N. 14 13 92.9% - - 1 7.1% Tonj S. 20 19 95.0% - - 1 5.0% Twic 14 14 100.0% - - - - Total 80 67 83.8% 1 1.3% 12 15.0% * “Trained” encompasses teachers with pre-service teacher training, in-service teacher training, and higher education diploma. “Unknown” teachers include those whose professional qualification was not reported.

Number of secondary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

% of secondary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

0 2 4 6 8

10 12 14 16 18 20

Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N. Twic Gogrial E.

Gogrial W.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E.

Tonj E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Twic Gogrial W.

Total

Male Female

0

5

10

15

20

Tonj S. Twic Tonj N. Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Tonj E.

Trained Untrained Unknown

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Tonj N. Tonj E. Total

Trained Untrained Unknown

Page 51: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

50

Number and % of secondary school teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

County Total Untrained In-service Pre-service Diploma Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 10 - - 1 10.0% - - 9 90.0% - - Gogrial W. 8 - - - - - - 8 100.0% - - Tonj E. 14 1 7.1% 1 7.1% - - 2 14.3% 10 71.4% Tonj N. 14 - - 2 14.3% - - 11 78.6% 1 7.1% Tonj S. 20 - - - - 5 25.0% 14 70.0% 1 5.0% Twic 14 - - - - - - 14 100.0% - - Total 80 1 1.3% 4 5.0% 5 6.3% 58 72.5% 12 15.0%

Number of secondary school teachers by professional qualification and gender, 2011

% of secondary school teachers by professional qualification, 2011

Number and % of secondary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

County Total Primary School Secondary School University and above Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 10 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 7 70.0% Gogrial W. 8 - - - - 8 100.0% Tonj E. 14 1 7.1% 6 42.9% 7 50.0% Tonj N. 14 - - 2 14.3% 12 85.7% Tonj S. 20 - - 14 70.0% 6 30.0% Twic 14 - - - - 14 100.0% Total 80 2 2.5% 24 30.0% 54 67.5% * “Primary school” includes completion of primary and intermediate/lower secondary education levels. “Secondary school” attainment includes completion of secondary, O-level, and/or A-level education levels. “University and above” attainment includes completion of four (4) years of university education or its equivalent.

Number of secondary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

% of secondary school teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Diploma Unknown Pre-service In-service Untrained

Male Female

Untrained 1.3% In-service

5.0% Pre-service

6.2%

Diploma 72.5%

Unknown 15.0%

0

5

10

15

Gogrial E. Tonj E. Gogrial W. Tonj N. Tonj S. Twic

Primary School Secondary School Univeristy and above

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Tonj E. Gogrial W. Tonj N. Tonj S. Twic Total

Primary School Secondary School Univeristy and above

Page 52: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

51

Number and % of secondary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

County Total Paid Volunteer Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 10 10 100.0% - - Gogrial W. 8 - - 8 100.0% Tonj E. 14 14 100.0% - - Tonj N. 14 14 100.0% - - Tonj S. 20 20 100.0% - - Twic 14 13 92.9% 1 7.1% Total 80 71 88.8% 9 11.3%

Number of secondary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

% of secondary school teachers by employment status and county, 2011

Secondary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and ownership, 2011

County Overall Government Non-government Pupil Teacher PTR Pupil Teacher PTR Pupil Teacher PTR

Gogrial E. 71 10 7.1 71 10 7.1 - - - Gogrial W. 119 8 14.9 - - - 119 8 14.9 Tonj E. 36 14 2.6 36 14 2.6 - - - Tonj N. 210 14 15.0 210 14 15.0 - - - Tonj S. 237 20 11.9 96 7 13.7 141 13 10.8 Twic 334 14 23.9 334 14 23.9 - - - Total 1,007 80 12.6 747 59 12.7 260 21 12.4

* “Non-government” here includes schools under community, private, NGO-supported, other, and unknown ownership.

Secondary school pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county and ownership, 2011

0

5

10

15

20

25

Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N. Twic Gogrial W.

Paid Volunteer

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Tonj E. Tonj N. Tonj S. Twic Gogrial W. Total

Paid Volunteer

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Twic Tonj N. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Tonj E. Gogrial W. Total

Government Non-government Overall

Page 53: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

52

7.2.3. Classrooms

Number of secondary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county and type, 2011 County Total Perm Semi-perm PCR Gogrial W. 3 3 - 39.7 Tonj E. 4 4 - 9.0 Tonj N. 6 4 2 35.0 Tonj S. 15 15 - 15.8 Twic 5 5 - 66.8 Total 33 31 2 30.5

% of secondary school classrooms by type, 2011

Secondary school pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by county, 2011

Number of secondary school classrooms and pupil-classroom ratio (PCR) by ownership type, 2011 Ownership Total Perm Semi-perm PCR Community 3 3 - 39.7 Gov.-aided 9 9 - 10.7 Government 15 13 2 43.4 NGO-supported - - - - Private 6 6 - 23.5 Other - - - - Total 33 31 2 30.5

Number and % of secondary schools with permanent and semi-permanent classrooms, 2011

County Total With perm and semi-perm classrooms Without perm and semi-perm classrooms

Count % total Count % total Gogrial E. 1 - - 1 100.0% Gogrial W. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj E. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj N. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj S. 2 2 100.0% - - Twic 1 1 100.0% - - Total 7 6 85.7% 1 14.3%

7.2.4. Curriculum and instruction

Secondary school pupil-textbook ratio (PTextR) by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

County Enrolment English textbooks Math textbooks

Count PTextR Count PTextR Gogrial E. 71 3 23.7 3 23.7 Gogrial W. 119 41 2.9 20 6.0 Tonj E. 36 1 36.0 1 36.0 Tonj N. 210 - - - - Tonj S. 237 9 26.3 7 33.9 Twic 334 - - - - Total 1,007 54 18.6 31 32.5

Secondary school pupil-textbook ratio (PTextR) by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

Secondary school pupil-textbook ratio (PtextR) by grade and subject (Eng and Math), 2011

Permanent 94%

Semi-permanent

6%

0

20

40

60

80

Twic Gogrial W. Tonj N. Tonj S. Tonj E. Total

0

10

20

30

40

Tonj E. Tonj S. Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Total

English Math

0

10

20

30

40

S1 S2 S3 Total

English Math

Page 54: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

53

Secondary school pupil-textbook ratio (PTextR) by grade and subject (English and Math), 2011

Grade Enrolment English textbooks Math textbooks

Count PTextR Count PTextR S1 490 25 19.6 15 32.7 S2 304 20 15.2 8 38.0 S3 213 9 23.7 8 26.6 Total 1,007 54 18.6 31 32.5

Number and % of secondary school by curriculum and grade, 2011 Curriculum S1 S2 S3 S4 Sudan

6 6 6 1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Total 6 6 6 1 * This section only counted the schools who responded to this question. Those who did not respond were not accounted for. ** Not all secondary schools offer S1-S4; the grade levels served vary across schools. Some schools serve S1-S2, some serve S3-S4, some serve only S1, etc.

7.2.5. Facilities

Number and % of secondary schools with and without access to drinking water by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 1 1 100.0% - - Gogrial W. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj E. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj N. 1 1 100.0% - - Tonj S. 2 2 100.0% - - Twic 1 1 100.0% - - Total 7 6 85.7% 1 14.3%

Number and % of secondary schools with Number and % of secondary schools with and and without access to latrine by county, 2011 without access to electricity by county, 2011

County Schools Access Count % total

Gogrial E. 1 1 100.0% Gogrial W. 1 1 100.0% Tonj E. 1 1 100.0% Tonj N. 1 1 100.0% Tonj S. 2 2 100.0% Twic 1 1 100.0% Total 7 7 100.0%

Number and % of secondary schools with and without access to health centre by county, 2011

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 1 - - 1 100.0% Gogrial W. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj E. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj N. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj S. 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0% Twic 1 - - 1 100.0% Total 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%

7.3. Student flow 7.3.1. Promotion rate

Secondary school promotion rate by county, grade, and gender, 2010-2011

County Overall Male Female S1-S2 S2-S3 S1-S2 S2-S3 S1-S2 S2-S3

Gogrial E. 83.3% 160.0% 83.3% 160.0% - - Gogrial W. 5.3% 37.3% 5.5% 41.5% 3.1% - Tonj E. - - - - - - Tonj N. 61.0% 55.0% 70.0% 60.6% 6.7% - Tonj S. 58.5% 110.2% 56.9% 106.5% 85.7% 166.7% Twic 60.7% 59.1% 54.5% 61.1% 83.3% 50.0% Average 28.3% 63.0% 27.3% 66.2% 39.3% 38.5%

* Promotion exceeding 100% occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

County Schools Access No access Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 1 - - 1 100.0% Gogrial W. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj E. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj N. 1 - - 1 100.0% Tonj S. 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0% Twic 1 - - 1 100.0% Total 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%

Page 55: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

54

Secondary school promotion rate by grade and gender, 2010-2011

7.3.2. Repetition rate

Secondary school repetition rate by county, grade, and gender, 2010-2011

County Overall Male Female S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3

Gogrial E. 33.3% 160.0% 200.0% 27.8% 140.0% 200.0% - - - Gogrial W. - 6.8% 25.0% - 7.5% 28.6% - - - Tonj N. 1.9% 2.8% - 2.2% 2.0% - - 10.0% - Tonj S. 2.3% 2.0% - 1.6% 2.2% - 14.3% - - Twic 7.1% 10.9% - 9.1% 7.8% - - 25.0% - Average 2.2% 8.4% 2.1% 2.1% 7.2% 2.2% 2.4% 17.9% -

Secondary school repetition rate by grade and gender, 2010-2011

7.3.3. Dropout rate

Secondary school dropout rate by county, grade, and gender, 2010-2011

County Overall Male Female S1-S2 S2-S3 S3-S4 S1-S2 S2-S3 S3-S4 S1-S2 S2-S3 S3-S4

Gogrial E. -16.7% -220.0% -100.0% -11.1% -200.0% -100.0% - - - Gogrial W. 94.7% 55.9% 75.0% 94.5% 50.9% 71.4% 96.9% - - Tonj E. - - - - - - - - - Tonj N. 37.1% 42.2% - 27.8% 37.4% - 93.3% 90.0% - Tonj S. 39.2% -12.2% - 41.5% -8.7% - 0.0% -66.7% - Twic 32.1% 30.0% - 36.4% 31.1% - 16.7% 25.0% - Average 69.5% 28.6% 97.9% 70.6% 26.6% 97.8% 58.3% 43.6% -

* Negative dropout rates occur due to high increase in enrolment between 2010 and 2011.

Secondary school dropout rate by grade and gender, 2010-2011

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

S1-S2 S2-S3

Male Female Average

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

S1 S2 S3

Male Female Average

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

S1-S2 S2-S3 S3-S4

Male Female Average

Page 56: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

55

8.0. ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION SYSTEM (AES), 2011 8.1. Access 8.1.1. Enrolment

Number of AES centre learners by county and programme, 2011

County Total ALP BFAL Gogrial E. 781 781 - Gogrial W. 707 707 - Tonj E. 727 727 - Tonj N. 277 277 - Tonj S. 1,404 1,404 - Twic 1,241 1,100 141 Total 5,137 4,996 141

* “Other” includes NGO-supported, unknown, and unspecified other ownership types.

Number of AES centre learners by county and gender, 2011

% of AES centre learners by county and gender, 2011

No. of AES centre learners by county and programme, 2011

County Total Ages ≤10

Ages 11-15

Ages 16-20

Ages ≥21

Gogrial E. 781 4 31 323 423 Gogrial W. 707 - 163 284 260 Tonj E. 727 - 37 266 424 Tonj N. 277 - - 58 219 Tonj S. 1,404 - 27 417 960 Twic 1,241 36 226 583 396 Total

% of AES centre learners by age group, 2011

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

Tonj S. Twic Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Tonj E. Tonj N.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Gogrial E. Tonj N. Gogrial W. Tonj S. Tonj E. Twic Total

Male Female

Ages ≤10 0.8%

Ages 11-15

9.4%

Ages 16-20 37.6%

Age ≥21 52.2%

Number and % of AES centre learners by county and gender, 2011

County Centres Male Female Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 781 617 79.0% 164 21.0% Gogrial W. 707 495 70.0% 212 30.0% Tonj E. 727 458 63.0% 269 37.0% Tonj N. 277 212 76.5% 65 23.5% Tonj S. 1,404 927 66.0% 477 34.0% Twic 1,241 757 61.0% 484 39.0% Total 5,137 3,466 67.5% 1,671 32.5%

Page 57: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

56

Number of AES centre learners by age group and gender, 2011

% of AES centre learners by age group and gender, 2011

8.2. Resources 8.2.1. Centres

Number of AES centres by programme, 2011 Programme No. centres Accelerated Learning Program (ALP) 45 Basic Functional Adult Literacy (BFAL) 2 Total 47

* Some centres have more than one programme.

Number of AES centres by funder, 2011 Funder No. centres Government 30 Community 8 Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) 2 Other 4 Unknown 3 Total 47

% of AES centres by programme, 2011

% of AES centres by funder, 2011

No. of AES centres by implementation agency, 2011

Implementation agency No. centres Education Development Center (EDC) 23 Save the Children in South Sudan (SCiSS) 3 Windle Trust 3 Other 6

% of AES centres by implementation agency, 2011

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

Ages ≤10 Ages 11-15 Ages 16-20 Age ≥21

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Ages ≤10 Ages 11-15

Ages 16-20

Age ≥21 Total

Male Female

ALP 95.7%

BFAL 4.3%

Gov 68.2%

Community 18.2%

MDTF 4.5% Other

9.1%

EDC 48.9%

SCiSS 6.4%

Windle Trust 6.4%

Other 12.8%

Unknown 25.5%

Page 58: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

57

8.2.2. Teachers

Number of AES centre teachers by county and programme, 2011

County Total ALP BFAL Gogrial E. 60 60 - Gogrial W. 39 39 - Tonj E. 21 21 - Tonj N. 22 22 - Tonj S. 45 45 - Twic 46 38 8 Total 233 225 8

* Some centres have more than one programme. Hence, some teachers may teach more than one programme.

% of AES centre teachers by programme, 2011

Number of AES centre teachers by programme and gender, 2011

% of AES centre teachers by programme and gender, 2011

Number and % of AES centre teachers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female PTR Count % total Count % total Gogrial E. 60 59 98.3% 1 1.7% 13.0 Gogrial W. 39 37 94.9% 2 5.1% 18.1 Tonj E. 21 21 100.0% - - 34.6 Tonj N. 22 20 90.9% 2 9.1% 12.6 Tonj S. 45 43 95.6% 2 4.4% 31.2 Twic 46 46 100.0% - - 27.0 Total 233 226 97.0% 7 3.0% 22.0

Number of AES centre teachers by county and gender, 2011

% of AES centre teachers by county and gender, 2011

ALP 96.6%

BFA 3.4%

0

50

100

150

200

250

ALP BFAL

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

BFAL ALP Total

Male Female

0

20

40

60

80

Gogrial E. Twic Tonj S. Gogrial W. Tonj E. Tonj N.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj E. Twic Gogrial E. Tonj S. Gogrial W. Tonj N. Total

Male Female

Page 59: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

58

AES centre pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county, 2011

Number and % of AES centre teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

County Total Trained Untrained Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 60 22 36.7% 37 61.7% 1 1.7% Gogrial W. 39 21 53.8% 15 38.5% 3 7.7% Tonj E. 21 9 42.9% 12 57.1% - - Tonj N. 22 8 36.4% 10 45.5% 4 18.2% Tonj S. 45 28 62.2% 10 22.2% 7 15.6% Twic 46 21 45.7% 15 32.6% 10 21.7% Total 233 109 46.8% 99 42.5% 25 10.7% * “Trained” encompasses teachers with pre-service teacher training, in-service teacher training, and higher education diploma. “Unknown” teachers include those whose professional qualification was not reported.

Number of AES centre teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

% of AES centre teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

Number and % of AES centre teachers by professional qualification and county, 2011

County Total Untrained In-service Pre-service Diploma Unknown Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 60 37 61.7% 16 26.7% 5 8.3% 1 1.7% 1 1.7% Gogrial W. 39 15 38.5% 21 53.8% - - - - 3 7.7% Tonj E. 21 12 57.1% 5 23.8% 4 19.0% - - - - Tonj N. 22 10 45.5% 8 36.4% - - - - 4 18.2% Tonj S. 45 10 22.2% 20 44.4% 6 13.3% 2 4.4% 7 15.6% Twic 46 15 32.6% 10 21.7% 9 19.6% 2 4.3% 10 21.7% Total 233 99 42.5% 80 34.3% 24 10.3% 5 2.1% 25 10.7%

0

10

20

30

40

Tonj E. Tonj S. Twic Gogrial W. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Total

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Tonj S. Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Twic Tonj E. Tonj N.

Trained Untrained Unknown

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Gogrial W. Twic Tonj E. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Total

Trained Untrained Unknown

Page 60: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

59

Number of AES centre teachers by professional qualification and gender, 2011

% of AES centre teachers by professional qualification, 2011

Number and % of AES teachers by academic qualification and county, 2011

County Total Prim school dropout Primary school Secondary school University and above Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 60 - - 34 56.7% 26 43.3% - - Gogrial W. 39 1 2.6% 28 71.8% 10 25.6% - - Tonj E. 21 3 14.3% 13 61.9% 5 23.8% - - Tonj N. 22 - - 12 54.5% 10 45.5% - - Tonj S. 45 - - 21 46.7% 23 51.1% 1 2.2% Twic 46 1 2.2% 13 28.3% 32 69.6% - - Total 233 5 2.1% 121 51.9% 106 45.5% 1 0.4% * “Primary school” includes completion of primary and intermediate/lower secondary education levels. “Secondary school” attainment includes completion of secondary, O-level, and/or A-level education levels. “University and above” attainment includes completion of four (4) years of university education or its equivalent.

Number of AES centre teachers by professional qualification and gender, 2011

% of AES centre teachers by professional qualification, 2011

Number and % of AES centre teachers by employment status and county, 2011

County Total Permanent AES

teacher Part-time AES

teacher Volunteer Unknown

Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total Gogrial E. 60 7 11.7% - - 45 75.0% 8 13.3% Gogrial W. 39 10 25.6% 9 23.1% 20 51.3% - - Tonj E. 21 9 42.9% 3 14.3% 8 38.1% 1 4.8% Tonj N. 22 - - 4 18.2% 9 40.9% 9 40.9% Tonj S. 45 21 46.7% 3 6.7% 18 40.0% 3 6.7% Twic 46 10 21.7% 4 8.7% 16 34.8% 16 34.8% Total 233 57 24.5% 23 9.9% 116 49.8% 37 15.9%

Number of AES centre teachers by employment status, 2011

% of AES centre teachers by employment status, 2011

0 20 40 60 80

100 120

Untrained In-service Pre-service Unknown Diploma

Male Female

Untrained 42.5%

In-service 34.3%

Pre-service 10.3%

Diploma 2.1%

Unknown 10.7%

0 20 40 60 80

100 120 140

Prim school dropout

Primary school

Secondary school

University and above

Male Female

Prim school dropout 2.1%

Primary school 51.9%

Secondary school 45.5%

University and above

0.4%

0 20 40 60 80

100 120

Permanent AES teacher

Part-time AES teacher

Volunteer Unknown

Male Female

Permanent AES teacher

24.5%

Part-time AES teacher

9.9% Volunteer 49.8%

Unknown 15.9%

Page 61: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

60

8.2.3. Classrooms

Number and % of AES centres’ type of building by county, 2011 County Total School building Borrowed hall Open air Unknown Gogrial E. 11 7 1 3 - Gogrial W. 7 2 1 3 1 Tonj E. 6 3 - 3 - Tonj N. 5 4 - - 1 Tonj S. 10 9 1 - - Twic 8 7 - 1 - Total 47 32 3 10 2

Number of AES centres’ type of building by county, 2011

% of AES centres’ type of building by county, 2011

8.2.4. Curriculum and instruction

AES centre pupil-textbook ratio (PTextR) by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

County Enrolment English textbooks Math textbooks

Count PTextR Count PTextR Gogrial E. 781 131 6.0 231 3.4 Gogrial W. 707 7 101.0 13 54.4 Tonj E. 727 103 7.1 93 7.8 Tonj N. 277 59 4.7 68 4.1 Tonj S. 1,404 195 7.2 148 9.5 Twic 1,241 79 15.7 61 20.3 Total 5,137 574 8.9 614 8.4

* “English” encompasses English reading, writing, and listening/speaking.

AES centre PtextR by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

8.3. Student flow 8.3.1. Dropouts

Number and % of AES centre dropouts by county and gender, 2010-2011

County Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 105 83 79.0% 22 21.0% Gogrial W. 52 28 53.8% 24 46.2% Tonj E. 9 3 33.3% 6 66.7% Tonj N. 2 - - 2 100.0% Tonj S. 30 24 80.0% 6 20.0% Twic 90 45 50.0% 45 50.0% Total 288 183 63.5% 105 36.5%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

School building

Open air Borrowed hall

Unknown

School building 68.1%

Borrowed hall

6.4%

Open air 21.3%

Unknown 4.3%

0

50

100

150

Gogrial W. Twic Tonj S. Tonj E. Gogrial E. Tonj N. Total

English Math

Page 62: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

61

Number of AES centre dropouts by county and gender, 2010-2011

% of AES centre dropouts by county and gender, 2010-2011

Number of AES centre dropouts by reason and gender, 2010-2011

Reason Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Dismissal from school 24 10 41.7% 14 58.3% Family responsibilities 108 84 77.8% 24 22.2% Health reasons 39 19 48.7% 20 51.3% Marriage 62 47 75.8% 15 24.2% Pregnancy-related 42 11 26.2% 31 73.8% Other 13 12 92.3% 1 7.7% Total 288 183 63.5% 105 36.5%

Number of AES centre dropouts by reason and gender, 2010-2011

% of AES centre dropouts by reason and gender, 2010-2011

0

20

40

60

80

100

Gogrial E. Twic Gogrial W. Tonj S. Tonj E. Tonj N.

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tonj S. Gogrial E. Gogrial W. Twic Tonj E. Tonj N. Total

Male Female

0

20

40

60

80

100

Family responsibilities

Marriage Health reasons Other Pregnancy-related Dismissal from school

Male Female

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Male Female

Page 63: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

62

8.4. Programme profiles 8.4.1. Accelerated Learning Programme (ALP)

Number of ALP learners by county and grade, 2011

County Total L1 L2 L3 L4 Gogrial E. 781 341 226 176 38 Gogrial W. 707 335 220 139 13 Tonj E. 727 284 279 160 4 Tonj N. 277 144 64 45 24 Tonj S. 1,404 743 265 279 117 Twic 1,100 458 261 230 151 Total 4,996 2,305 1,315 1,029 347

Number and % of ALP learners by grade and age group, 2011

County Total Ages ≤10

Ages 11-15

Ages 16-20

Ages ≥21

L1 2,305 2 265 810 1,228 0.1% 11.5% 35.1% 53.3% L2 1,315 2 110 563 640 0.2% 8.4% 42.8% 48.7% L3 1,029 - 53 376 600 - 5.2% 36.5% 58.3% L4 347 - 12 132 203 - 3.5% 38.0% 58.5% Total 4,996 4 440 1,881 2,671 0.1% 8.8% 37.7% 53.5%

Number of ALP learners by grade and gender, 2011

Number of ALP learners by age group and gender, 2011

Number of centres with ALP by funder, 2011

Funder Centres Centres % Community 6 13.3% Government 30 66.7% MDTF 2 4.4% Other 4 8.9% Unknown 3 6.7% Total 45 100.0%

Number of centres with ALP by implementing agency, 2011

Agency Centres Centres % EDC 23 51.1% SCiSS 3 6.7% Windle Trust 3 6.7% Other 5 11.1% Unknown 11 24.4% Total 45 100.0%

Number of centres with ALP by funder, 2011

Number of centres with ALP by implementation agency, 2011

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

L1 L2 L3 L4

Male Female

0 200 400 600 800

1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

Ages ≤10 Ages 11-15 Ages 16-20 Age ≥21

Male Female

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0

5

10

15

20

25

EDC Unknown Other SCiSS Windle Trust

Page 64: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

63

Number and % of ALP teachers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female

Count % total Count % total

Gogrial E. 60 59 98.3% 1 1.7% Gogrial W. 39 37 94.9% 2 5.1% Tonj E. 21 21 100.0% - - Tonj N. 22 20 90.9% 2 9.1% Tonj S. 45 43 95.6% 2 4.4% Twic 38 38 100.0% - - Total 225 218 96.9% 7 3.1%

Number and % of ALP teachers by county and professional qualification, 2011

County Total Trained Untrained

Count % total Count %

total Gogrial E. 60 22 36.7% 38 63.3% Gogrial W. 39 21 53.8% 18 46.2% Tonj E. 21 9 42.9% 12 57.1% Tonj N. 22 8 36.4% 14 63.6% Tonj S. 45 28 62.2% 17 37.8% Twic 38 20 52.6% 18 47.4% Total 225 108 48.0% 117 52.0%

Number of ALP teachers by county and gender, 2011

Number of ALP teachers by professional qualification and gender, 2011

ALP pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county, 2011

County Learner Teacher PTR

Gogrial E. 781 60 13.0 Gogrial W. 707 39 18.1 Tonj E. 727 21 34.6 Tonj N. 277 22 12.6 Tonj S. 1,404 45 31.2 Twic 1,100 38 28.9 Total 4,996 225 22.2

ALP PTextR by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

County Enrol. English Math Count PTextR Count PTextR

Gogrial E. 781 131 6.0 231 3.4 Gogrial W. 707 7 101.0 13 54.4 Tonj E. 727 103 7.1 93 7.8 Tonj N. 277 59 4.7 68 4.1 Tonj S. 1,404 195 7.2 148 9.5 Twic 1,100 71 15.5 53 20.8 Total 4,996 566 8.8 606 8.2

ALP pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county, 2011

ALP PtextR by county and subject (Eng and Math), 2011

218 7

96.9%

3.1% 0

50

100

150

200

250

Male Female

Teachers Teachers %

108 117

48.0% 52.0%

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Trained Untrained

Teachers Teachers %

12.6

13.0

18.1

28.9

31.2

34.6

22.2

0 10 20 30 40

Tonj N.

Gogrial E.

Gogrial W.

Twic

Tonj S.

Tonj E.

Total

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

English Math

Page 65: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

64

8.4.2. Basic Functional Adult Literacy (BFAL)

Number of BFAL programme learners by county and grade, 2011

County Total G1 G2 Twic 141 97 44 Total 141 97 44

Number and % of BFAL programme learners by grade and age group, 2011

County Total Ages 5-10

Ages 11-15

Ages 16-20

Ages 21+

G1 97 36 34 24 3 37.1% 35.1% 24.7% 3.1% G2 44 - 10 26 8 - 22.7% 59.1% 18.2% Total 141 36 44 50 11 25.5% 31.2% 35.5% 7.8%

Number of BFAL programme learners by grade and gender, 2011

Number of BFAL programme learners by age group and gender, 2011

Number and % of centres with BFAL programme by funder, 2011

Funder Centres Centres % Community 2 100.0% Total 2 100.0%

Number and % of centres with BFAL programme by implementing agency, 2011

Agency Centres Centres % Other 1 50.0% Unknown 1 50.0% Total 2 100.0%

Number and % of BFAL programme teachers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female

Count % total Count % total Twic 8 8 100.0% - - Total 8 8 100.0% - -

Number and % of BFAL programme teachers by county and professional qualification, 2011

County Total Trained Untrained

Count % total Count % total Twic 8 1 12.5% 7 87.5% Total 8 1 12.5% 7 87.5%

BFAL programme pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by county, 2011

County Learner Teacher PTR

Twic 141 8 17.6 Total 141 8 17.6

BFAL programme PTextR by county and subject (English and Math), 2011

County Enrol. English Math

Count PTextR Count PTextR Twic 141 8 17.6 8 17.6 Total 141 8 17.6 8 17.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

G1 G2

Male Female

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Ages ≤10 Ages 11-15 Ages 16-20 Age ≥21

Male Female

Page 66: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

65

9.0. TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (TVET), 2011 9.1. Access 9.1.1. Enrolment

Number and % TVET centre trainees by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Tonj N. 26 26 100.0% - - Total 26 26 100.0% - -

Number and % TVET centre trainees by programme and gender, 2011

Programme Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Agriculture 26 26 100.0% - - Total 26 26 100.0% - -

Number and % of TVET centres by admission

minimum age requirement, 2011 Minimum age requirement Centres Centres % 18 to 25 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0%

* One centre may have more than one type of service for female trainees.

9.2. Resources 9.2.1. Centres

Number and % of TVET centres by agency of administration, 2011

Agency of administration Centres Centres % Central gov 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0%

* One centre may have more than one type of service for female trainees.

Number and % of TVET centres by funding source, 2011

Minimum age requirement Centres Centres % Central gov 1 50.0% State gov - 0.0% External org 1 50.0% Total 2 100.0%

* Some centres have more than one funding source.

9.2.2. Teachers/trainers

Number and % of TVET centre teachers/trainers by county and gender, 2011

County Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Tonj N. 6 6 100.0% - - Total 6 6 100.0% - -

Number and % of TVET centre teachers/trainers by county and professional qualification, 2011

County Total Trained Untrained Count % total Count % total

Tonj N. 6 6 100.0% - - Total 6 6 100.0% - -

Number and % of TVET centre teachers/trainers by county and academic qualification, 2011

County Total Not completed

primary education Primary education

certificate Secondary education

certificate University/tertiary

degree Count % total Count % total Count % total Count % total

Tonj N. 6 - - - - 1 16.7% 5 83.3% Total 6 - - - - 1 16.7% 5 83.3%

Number and % of TVET centre teachers/trainers by county and appointment type, 2011

County Total Paid Volunteer Count % total Count % total

Tonj N. 6 6 100.0% - - Total 6 6 100.0% - -

TVET centre pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) by ownership, 2011 Ownership Trainees Teachers/trainers PTR Central gov 26 6 4.3 Total 26 6 4.3

Page 67: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

66

9.2.3. Curriculum

Number and % of TVET centres by programmes offered, 2011

Programme Centres Centres % Agriculture 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0%

* Some centres teach more than one programme.

Number and % of TVET centres with textbooks/ instruction manuals for programmes, 2011

Programme Centres Centres % Agriculture 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0%

* Some centres teach more than one programme.

Number and % of TVET centres teaching general skills, 2011

Skill Centres Centres % Eng. language 1 33.3% Entrepre. 1 33.3% Life skills 1 33.3% Total 3 100.0%

* Some centres teach more than one skill.

Number and % of TVET centres by source of curriculum, 2011

Source of curriculum Centres Centres % School-dev curriculum 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0%

* Some centres teach more than one service.

9.2.4. Facilities

Number and % of TVET centre classrooms by county and type, 2011

County Total Permanent Semi-permanent Other Count % total Count % total Count % total

Tonj N. 2 2 100.0% - - - - Total 2 2 100.0% - - - -

Number and % of TVET centres with selected facilities, 2011 Facility Centres with the facility Centres with the facility % Dormitory for trainees 1 100.0% Latrine 1 100.0% Staff/teachers/trainers quarters 1 100.0% Electricity 1 100.0% Safe drinking water 1 100.0%

9.3. Student flow 9.3.1. TVET centre completion

Number and % of TVET centre graduates by county, 2010-2011

County Total Male Female Count % total Count % total

Tonj N. 27 27 100.0% - - Total 27 27 100.0% - -

9.4. Operations

9.4.1. Operational status

Number and % of TVET centres by operational status, 2011 Source of curriculum Centres Centres % Operational 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0%

9.4.2. Fee/tuition

Number and % of TVET centres by fees/tuition Fees/tuition Centres Centres % >5,000 1 100.0% Total 1 100.0%

Page 68: cation Statistics - FHI 360 South Sudan Education...the Education Management Information System (EMIS) have come a long way since the baseline assessment, or the Rapid Assessment of

67

10.0. Missing schools 10.1. Pre-primary schools

No. State County Payam EMIS code School 1 Warrap Twic Akoc 70007 Akec pre-primary

10.2. Primary schools

No. State County Payam EMIS code School 1 Warrap Gogrial E. Pathoun East 70429 Mayom Biong Primary School 2 Warrap Gogrial W. Alek North 70020 Mabior Mun Primary School 3 Warrap Gogrial W. Gogrial 70038 Malual Awien Primary School 4 Warrap Tonj E. Paliang 70467 Rumabuth Primary School 5 Warrap Tonj N. Alabek 70493 Majaklou Primary School 6 Warrap Tonj S. Wanhalel 70148 Ayuaath Primary School 7 Warrap Tonj S. Wanhalel 70153 Wanhalel Basic School 8 Warrap Tonj S. Wanhalel 70380 Mabior Yar Primary School 9 Warrap Twic Pan-nyok 70186 Pannyok Primary School 10 Warrap Twic Pan-nyok 70193 Tualie Primary School 11 Warrap Twic Turalei 70201 Majok Amuol Primary School

10.3. Secondary schools

No. State County Payam EMIS code School 1 Warrap Gogrial W. Akon South 70004 Akon Secondary school 2 Warrap Gogrial W. Kuac North 70003 Kwajok Secondary school

10.4. TVET centres6

No. State County Payam EMIS code Centre 1 Warrap Tonj N. Manalor 39 Marial Lou Livestock Training Centre

6 The full list of TVET centres is provided here upon the request of the Ministry of Labor.