case study stone column
DESCRIPTION
hjkhkjTRANSCRIPT
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
1/17
CASE STUDY:
STONE COLUMN
Stone column technique for ground improvement is being extensively used to undertake
constructions in weak soils. The stone columns essentially increase the bearing capacity
of loose cohesionless soils. In cohesive soils, along with the increase of bearing capacity,
the consolidation settlement of the ground under loading is also considerably reduced. In
addition, in cohesive soils stone columns act as drainage paths to accelerate the rate of
consolidation of the residual settlement. Even though stone columns are very useful for
these purposes, designs made without proper concept of the behavior of the stone column
and execution of work not understanding the stone column and behavior pattern of the
nontreated ground leads to complications. !ailures have occurred where stone columns
have been used for ground improvement. This paper attempts to highlight these factors. "
case study where the foundation failure of a structure constructed on a soil improved by
stone columns highlights the various aspects discussed.
SHAPE OF STONE COLUMN AFTER LOADING
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
2/17
SUITABILITY OF THE GROUND FOR STONE COLUMNS
Two common methods of stone column constructions are#
$ %ibrofloatation
$ &ored rammed system
In the floatation technique, a vibrating needle working with the water 'et reduces the
friction of the surrounding cohesionless soil, filling the voids and thus achieving
compaction. This creates a cavity into which borrowed granular material is filled and
compacted. Thus, in general, the density of the ground increases with the increase in
friction angle. "s a result, bearing capacity increases. This technique is therefore possible
only in cohesionless soils.
The bored rammed stone columns are used in cohesive soils. In this technique, a casing
pipe is used to remove the cohesive soil protecting the sides of the bore, thus minimising
disturbance to the surrounding soil. The stones are laid into the bore and rammed to a
larger diameter as the casing pipe is withdrawn. These columns achieve their strength by
the lateral restraint offered by the surrounding soil. It is therefore very essential that the
shear strength of the surrounding soil not be reduced by the construction of the stone
column. (ence, the stone column technique could be adopted in clays of low sensitivity.
These columns also act as drainage paths to accelerate settlements under loading.
&)*E+ *"E+ ST)-E )/0- %I&*))1"TI)-
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
3/17
TERMINOLOGY:
Displacementn!n"#isplacement t$pe !% installati!n p&!cessIf the soil is laterally
displaced while making the whole due to driving of a tube or a casing ,it is the
displacement type of boring .when the soil is taken out during boring ,it is non
displacement type of installation.
G&!'n# imp&!(ement"To improve the load bearing capacity of the loose or soft soil to
the required depth by some practical methods.
Sensiti(it$ !% cla$"The ratio of the unconfined compressive strength of clay at its natural
state to the remoulded condition.
)!&*in+ st!ne c!l'mn"" stone column forming part of a foundation system of a
structure.
Initial test c!l'mnolumns,which are not working columns, but are installed for
assessing the load carrying capacity of stone column. Such columns may be tested either
to its ultimate load capacity or to at least 2.3 times the design load .The test is called
initial load test.
R!'tin+ test c!l'mn" The column that is selected for load testing 4is subsequently
loaded for the purpose. The test column may form working column itself, if sub'ected to
routine load test with loads up to 2.2 times the safe load. This test is called routine load
test.
Ultimate l!a#5The maximum load which a column can carry before the failure of
ground or column material, whichever is lower.
Sa%e l!a#/oad derived by applying factor of safety on the ultimate load capacity of the
column or as determine by column load test.
Fact!& !% sa%et$*atio of ultimate load capacity of column to the safe load capacity of
stone column.
All!,a-le l!a#The load which may be applied to a stone column after taking into
account its ultimate load capacity, column spacing, allowable settlement , etc.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
4/17
./ SOME IMPORTANT FEATURES OF STONE COLUMN TREATMENT:
2.2 Influence of soil type
Subsurface soil whose undrained shear strength range from 6 to 37kpa or loose sandy
soils including silty or clayey sands represents a potential class of soils requiring
improvement by stone columns. Subsurface conditions for which stone columns are in
general not suited include sensitive clays and silts 8sensitivity greater than 9: which loose
strength when vibrated and also where suitable bearing strata for resting the toe of the
column is not available under weak strata.
2.; Influence of construction methodology
The disturbance caused to the soil mass due to the particular method of constructing the
stone columns significantly affects the overall effects of the composite ground. The
availability of equipment, speed of construction and the depth of treatment would
normally influence the choice of construction technique.
2.< Treatment depth
The treatment depth with stone column for a given soil profike should be so determined
that the most significant compressible strata that contribute to the settlement of the
foundation.
2.9 "rea of treatment
Stone columns work most effectively when used for large area stabili=ation of the soil
mass. Their application in small groups beneath building foundation is limited and it is
not being used. Thus, large loaded areas which apply uniform loading a foundation soils,
such as beneath embankments, tank farms and fills represent a ma'or area of application.
2.3 Termination
End bearing is not a specific requirement for stone columns. (owever, they should
extent through soft compressible strata. The soil near the ground surface has a dominating
influence on the settlement and ultimate bearing capacity of stone columns.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
5/17
0/ BASIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
;.2 Stone column diameter, +
;.2.2 Installation of stone in soft cohesive soils is basically a self compensating process
that is softer the soil, bigger is the diameter of the stone column formed. +ue to the
lateral displacement of stones during the vibrations>ramming, the completed diameter of
the hole is always greater than the initial diameter or the casing depend upon the soil
type, its undrained shear strength, stone si=e, characteristics of the vibrating probe used
and the construction method.
;.2.; "pproximate diameter of the stone column in the field may be determined from the
known compacted volume of material required to fill the hole of known length and
maximum and minimum densities of the stones.
;.; 1attern
Stone columns should be installed preferably in an equilateral triangular pattern which
gives the most dense packing although a square pattern may also be used.
;.< Spacing
;.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
6/17
;.9.; The equivalent circular has an effective diameter 8+e: which is given by following
equation#
+e ? 2.73 S for an equilateral triangular pattern, and
? 2.2< S for a square pattern
where
S ? spacing of the stone columns
The resulting equivalent cylinder of composite ground with diameter + inclosing the
tributary soil and one stone column is known as unit cell.
;.3 *eplacement ratio 8as:
;.3.2 !or purpose of settlement and stability analysis, the composite ground representing
an infinitely wide loaded area may be modeled as a unit cell comprising the stone column
and the surrounding tributary soil. To quantify the amount of soil replaced by the stone,
the term replacement ratio, as, is used. *eplacement ratio 8as: is given by#
as? "s>"? "s>8"s @ "g:
Ahere
"S ? "rea of stone column,
"g ? "rea of ground surrounding the column,
" ? Total area within the unit cell.
;.3.; The area replacement ratio may also be expressed as follows#
as? 7.B76 8+>S:;
Ahere the constant 7.B76 is a function of pattern used which, in this case, is commonly
employed equilateral triangular pattern.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
7/17
;.C Stress oncentration !actor 8n:
;.C.2 Stress concentration occurs on the stone column because it is considerably stiffer
than the surrounding soil. !rom equilibrium consideration the stress in the stiffer stone
columns should be greater than the stress in the surrounding soil. The stress concentration
factor, 8n: due to externally applied load is defined as the ratio of average stress in the
stone column to the stress in the soil within the unit cell.
n ?
The value of 8n: generally lies between ;.3 and 3 at the ground surface. The stress
concentration factor 8n: increases with time of consolidation and decreases along the
length of stone column. (igher 8n: values at the ground surface may result if load is
applied to the composite ground through a rigid foundation as compared to flexible
foundation. The stress concentration factor 8n: may be predicted using elastic theory as
function of the modular ratio of the stone and clay assuming equal vertical displacements.
(owever, as the modular ratio can vary within wide limits.
1. FAILURE MECHANISMS:
!ailure mechanisms of single stone column loaded over its area significantly depends
upon of length of column. !or column having length greater than its critical length 8that is
about four times the column diameter: and irrespective whether its end bearing or
floating, its fails by bulging. (owever, column shorter than the critical length are likely to
fail in general shear if it is end bearing on a rigid base and end bearing. In practice,
however, a stone column is usually loaded over an area greater than its own in which case
it experiences significantly less bulging leading to greater ultimate load capacity and
reduced settlements since the load is carried by both the stone column and the
surrounding soil.
Aherever interlayering of sand and clay occurs, and if the sand layer is thick enough as
compared to the si=e of the loaded area, the general compaction achieved by the action of
the installation of the stone column may provide adequate rigidity to effectively disperse
the applied stresses thereby controlling the settlement of the weak layer. (owever,
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
8/17
effective reduction in settlement may be brought about by carrying out the treatment of
stone columns through the compressible layer.
Ahen clay is present in the form of lenses and if the ratio of the thickness of the lense to
the stone column diameter is less than or equal to 2, the settlement due to presence of
lenses may be insignificant.
In mixed soils, the failure of stone columns should be checked both for the predominantly
sandy soils as well as the clayey soil, the governing value being lower of the two
calculated values.
2/ DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
9.2Deneral
&y assuming a triaxial state of stress in the stone column and both the column and the
surrounding soil at failure, the ultimate vertical stresses a2, which the stone column can
take, may be determined from the following equation#
2 ? 2 @ sin2
; 2 @ sin;
Ahere
? lateral confining stress mobili=ed by the surrounding soil to resist the bulging of
the stone columnF
Gs? angle of internal friction of stone columnF
? coefficient of passive earth pressure kpof the stone column.
This approach assumes a plane strain loading condition and hence does not realistically
consider three dimensional geometry of single stone column.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
9/17
9.2.2The bearing capacity of an isolated stone column or that located within a group may
be computed using the other established theories also .&esides the passive resistance
mobili=ed by the soil, the increase in capacity of column due to surcharge should be taken
into account.
9.2.; 1articular attention should be paid to the presence of very weak organic clay layers
of limited thickness where local bulging failure may takes place .therefore capacity of
column in such weak clays should also be checked even if they are below the critical
depth.
9.; "d'acent Structures
9.;.2when working near existing structure, care should be taken to avoid the damage to
such strictures by suitable measures.
9.;.; In case of deep excavation ad'acent to stone columns, prior shoring or other suitable
arrangement should be done to ground against lateral movement of soil or loss of
confining soil pressure.
9.< 0ltimate load capacity and Settlement
9.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
10/17
9.3 /oad Test *esult
The ultimate load capacity of single column may be determined from load tests with
reasonable accuracy. The settlement of a stone column obtained at safe >working load
form load test result on a single column should not be directly used in forecasting the
settlement of the structure unless experience from similar foundation in similar soil
conditions on its settlement behavior is available. The average settlement may be
assessed on the basis of sub soil data and loading details of the structures as whole using
the principles of soil mechanics.
9.C !actor of Safety
9.C.2 The following factors should be considered for selecting a suitable factor of safety#
a: *eliability of the value of ultimate load carrying of the column,
b: The type of superstructure and the type of loading,
c: "llowable total and differential settlement of the structure, and
d: The manner of load transfer from stone column to the soil.
9.C.; It is desirable that the ultimate capacity of column is obtained from an initial load
test. The minimum factor of safety for such a load test should be ;.3
9.C.< Ahen ultimate capacity is derived from soil mechanics consideration, the minimum
factor of safety recommended in each formula should be applicable.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
11/17
STONE COLUMN IN CLAY SPACING
3 GRANULAR BLAN4ETS:
3.2 Irrespective of the method used to construct the stone columns, the blanket laid over
the top of the stone columns should consist of clean medium to coarse sand compacted in
layers to a relative density of 63 to H7 percent.
3.; inimum thickness of the compacted sand blanket should be 7.3 m. This blanket
should be exposed to atmosphere at its periphery for pore water pressure dissipation.
3.< "fter ensuring complete removal of slush deposited during boring operations, a
minimum depth of 7.3m, preferably 7.63 m below the granular blanket should be
compacted by other suitable means, such as rolling >tamping to the specified densification
criteria.
TRIANGULAR ARRANGEMENT OF STONE COLUMN
5 FIELD CONTROLS:
C.2 In the methods involving boring the set criteria and the consumption of granular fillform the main quality control measures for the columns constructed by the non
displacement technique. !or ascertaining the consumptions of fill, the diameter of the
column as formed during field trials should be measured in its uppermost part for a depth
of four diameters and average of these observations taken as the column diameter.
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
12/17
C.; In the case of vibrofloats, the following minimum field controls should be observed#
a: %ibroflot penetration depth including the depth of embedment in firm strata,
b: onitoring of volume of backfill added to obtain an indication of the densities
achieved, and
c: onitoring of ammeter or hydraulic pressure gauge readings to verify that the
maximum possible density has been achieved in case of vibrofloted columns.
6/ FIELD LOADING TESTS:
6.2 Irrespective of the method used to construct the stone columns ,the initial load test
should be performed at a trial test site to evaluate the load settlement behavior of the soil
stone column system. The test should be conducuted on a single and also on a group of
minimum three columns.
6.; !or the initial load test, in order to simulate the equivalent steel plate of adequate
thickness an rigidity may be based on the effective tributary soil area of stone column for
a single column test and three times the effective area of single column for a three
column group test in each case, the footing may cover the equivalent circular effective
area centrally.
6.9 The initial and final soil conditions at trial site should be investigated by drilling at
least one borehole and one static cone test>pressure meter test>dynamic cone test prior and
subsequent to the installation of column. "ll the tests including the standard penetration
test, field vane shear test and collection of undisturbed>disturbed samples and laboratory
testing on the samples should be as per relevant Indian standards.
6.3 " granular blanket of medium to coarse having thickness not less than
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
13/17
6.6 !ollowing procedure should be followed for application of load#
a: The load should be applied to the footing by a suitable kentledge, taking care to avoid
impact or fluctuations.
b: The kentledge will be minimum 2.3 of the design load and should be
maintained till the rate of settlement is less than 7.73mm>h at which instant the next stage
of loading should be applied.
f: The design as well as the maximum test load should be maintained for a minimum
period of 2; h after stabili=ation of settlement to the rate.
g: /oad settlement and time settlement relationships should be plotted from the
settlement observed from each increment of load at intervals of 2min,;min,9min,Hmin,2Cmin,2>;h,2h,2.3h,;h,
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
14/17
Sin+le c!l'mn test a&&an+ement: a7 c!l'mn a&ea l!a#in+8 -7 enti&e a&ea l!a#in+
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
15/17
9/ ELIMATION OF LOAD CAPACITY OF A COLUMN:
H.2. ST)-E )/0-S I- )(ESI%E S)I/S
/oad capacity of the treated ground may be obtained by summing up the contribution of
each of the following components for the wide spread loads, such as tankages and
embankments#
2. apacity of the stone column resulting from the resistance offered by the surrounding
soil against its lateral deformation under axial load.
;. apacity of the stone column resulting soil due to surcharge over it,
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
16/17
Ahere ro is the increase in mean radial stress due to surcharge, and q safe is the safe
bearing pressure of soil with the factor of safety of ;.3
qsafe?u.->;.3
Increase in ultimate cavity expansion stress ? ro!qJ
Ahere
!q ? vesicKs dimension less cylindrical cavity expansion factor
!qK?2 for Gg ?7
Increase in yield stress of the column ?kpcol ro
d: "llowing a factor safety of ;, increase in safe load of column, L; is given by the
following formula#
L; ? kpcol ro"S>;
The surcharge effect is minimum at edges and it should be compensated by installingadditional columns in the peripheral region of the facility.
H.< &earing support provided by the intervening soil#
This component consists of the intrinsic capacity of the virgin soil to support a vertical
load which may be computed as follows#
Effective area of stone column including the intervening soil for triangular pattern
?7.HCC s;
"rea of intervening soil for each column, "gis given by the following formula#
"g ?7.HCCs;5M+;>9
Safe load taken by the intervening soil,
-
5/20/2018 CASE STUDY Stone Column
17/17
L< ?qsafe"g
)verall safe load on each column and its tributary soil
L? L2 @L; @L