case study 2 psi policy & implementation leadership uk office of public sector information chris...
TRANSCRIPT
Case Study 2
PSI Policy & Implementation leadership
UK Office of Public Sector Information
Chris CorbinePSIplus Analyst
Beckov, Slovakia, 11th February 2009
funded by eContentPlus
Case Study 2: Why OPSI?
European Commission recommendation 9 December 2008, Oxford, UK
Key role of Member States
• Ensure correct implementation and application of PSI Directive
• Make PSI re-use a national policy
• Deployment measures that facilitate re-use– Establishment of bodies responsible for PSI (UK OPSI)– Stimulate demand– Fair licences– Charging (marginal costs)– Formats– Conflict resolution mechanisms/Watchdog of PSCH– Cooperation with private sector
• UK approach to PSI re-use to be exported to the rest of EU MS
www.ePSIplus.net
The Office of Public Sector Information
At the heart of information policy, setting standards, delivering
access and encouraging the re-use of public sector information
OPSI is:
• a regulator
• a licensor of Crown and Parliamentary copyright material
• the policy lead on the re-use of public sector information across the UK
• as Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO), responsible for publishing and
overseeing contractual arrangements for legislation and other official
publishing UK wide
Case Study 2: What is OPSI?
www.ePSIplus.net Slide source: OPSI 11 November 2008 London
The National Archives
Is at the heart of information policy, setting standards and supporting innovation in
information and records management across the UK, providing advice on opening up and
encouraging the re-use of public sector information. Through our efforts in promoting best
practice in information management, we look to ensure the survival of today's information
for the future.
The National Archives is also the UK government's official archive, containing 900 years of history with
records ranging from parchment and paper scrolls through to digital files and archived websites. The
National Archives makes open records available to all, either onsite or online, continuously developing
new tools to make history tangible for everyone.
Case Study 2: What is TNA?
www.ePSIplus.net Source: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/about/whowhathow.htm?source=ddmenu_about1
Case Study 2: Report to?
www.ePSIplus.net
Case Study 2: PSI Implementation
www.ePSIplus.netSource: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/psi-regulations/index
Case Study 2: Single Complaint point
www.ePSIplus.net
PSI Re-userPSI Re-user
Regulators acting as if they were one
Case Study 2: Click-use-licence
www.ePSIplus.net Source: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/about/website-statistics/licensing-statistics.htm
Case Study 2: Click-use-licence
www.ePSIplus.net Source: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/about/website-statistics/licensing-statistics.htm
Case Study 2: Exclusive Arrangements declared?
www.ePSIplus.net
Case Study 2: Annual Reports?
www.ePSIplus.net36 Pages
65 Pages
Two reports cover period 1 July 05 to 1 July 08
Case Study 2: OPSI Activity level
www.ePSIplus.net
UK PSI time line period 1 July 05 to 1 July 08
OPSI has attended every ePSIplus Thematic meeting (Sponsored one) and attended the ePSIplus conference. Strong expression of wishing to share and learn. Very visible. Range of personnel involved which demonstrates the learning but also the development of the person.
OPSI has attended every Commission PSI Group meeting. Shows commitment
www.ePSIplus.net
PSI Framework OPSI Provides
Central PSI portal Can be referred to minimal resources
Yes
Standard Licence No negotiating Yes
Online click use standard licence Minimal human intervention Yes
No charge No transaction costs Yes
Annual progress reports published Awareness Yes
Charges pre-published No negotiating
Consistency
Not applicable
Asset Lists Consistent with good data management
Yes
Exclusive arrangements declared and/or phased out. (by December 2008)
No negotiating Yes
Separate accounts between Public Task and Trading task
Improved business management
Not applicable
IPR Management (preferably waive IPR) Cost effective data management
Yes
One public sector data regime Simple Via policy
Manage requests just as in FOI Regime Minimal human intervention Yes
OPSI and the WIN WIN framework
The key to success is to KEEP IT SIMPLE!
Keep in mind the demographic change in society: simplification is one of the options
www.ePSIplus.net
PSI Framework Czech Rep.
Hungary Poland Slovakia
Central PSI portal
Standard Licence
Online click use standard licence
No charge
Annual progress reports published
Charges pre-published
Asset Lists
Exclusive arrangements declared and/or phased out. (by December 2008)
Unified complaint process
IPR Management (preferably waive IPR)
One public sector data regime
Manage requests just as in FOI Regime
Visegrad Countries and the WIN WIN framework
www.ePSIplus.net
Visegrad Countries - PSI Policy
Public Sector Information: from Cradle to the Grave!
Creation Operational Archive
1. Description of policy and why2. Presence of in V4 Countries
www.ePSIplus.net
Visegrad Countries – Information sharing Policy
Public Sector
CommercialNot commerciale.g. Citizens
Intermediataries
PSI Directive
Inspire Directive
Data Privacy
Directive
Interested in PSI? Then why not visit:
www.ePSIplus.net
Thank you for your attention
funded by eContentPlus