case studiescase study 2- bacteria •clear fork downstream from zoo creek is sampled monthly for...

19
CASE STUDIES BY: DYLAN TISSUE AND PATRICK STRONG,

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

CASE STUDIESBY: DYLAN TISSUE AND PATRICK STRONG,

Page 2: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

CASE STUDY 1- DYE TESTING

• Observed flowing outfall.

• Parameters in range except one.

• Chlorine read >1.5 ppm.

Page 3: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

DISCOVERY

• No leaks were visible above surface.

• Storm drain was televised.

• Infiltration from a sub surface break was found.

Page 4: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

AERIAL

Page 5: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

CASE STUDY 2

• Observed flowing outfall.

• Sewage odor and scum observed.

• Ammonia read <8.0 mg/L.

Page 6: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

DISCOVERY

• Sewer main dye tested and televised

• No results

• Televised storm drain system

• Could not traverse some lines.

• Dye tested businesses.

Page 7: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

AERIAL

Page 8: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

ILLICIT CONNECTION INVESTIGATION

• Outfall observation

• Discharging

• Sewage Odor

• Scum observed

• Residents/business owners complaining of sewage odor

• Ammonia reading OVERANGE >8.0 mg/L

Page 9: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

DYE TEST RESULTS

Page 10: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

REMEDIATION

Page 11: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

CASE STUDY 2- CITY OF FORT WORTH (ZOO CREEK)

Page 12: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

CASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA

• Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria

• Occasional uptick in bacteria

• Outfalls typically have flow through the area

• Elevated bacteria results observed during monthly monitoring

Page 13: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

OBSERVATION FACTS:

• Series of outfalls with ambiguous sampling

results

• Ammonia-nitrogen was elevated

• E.coli was less than 2,400 MPN/100ML

• Not necessarily an SSO, could be wildlife

• Old infrastructure from 1920s

• Area surrounds University

Page 14: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

WHERE IS THE BACTERIA COMING FROM?

• Aging infrastructure?

• Some sanitary sewer pipes are from the 1920s

• Cross Connections?

• Wildlife and Pets?

• University or Schools?

• Zoo?

Page 15: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

PROBLEM

• Cost

• CCTVing is EXPENSIVE

• Bacteria source tracking is (slightly) expensive

• Only a few outfalls would be able to be source tracked

• Time

• A luxury we don’t have

Page 16: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

SOLUTION

• Test for optical brighteners

• Optical brighteners are found in laundry detergent

• Used to make your whites whiter and your brights, brighter

• When optical brighteners are present, they will show fluorescent under UV light

Page 17: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

SOLUTION

• Fluorometers

• Slightly expensive ($1K) and our budget was stretched thin

• Not to mention we needed answers quickly

• Tampons to the rescue!!!

• Super cheap and readily available

• WE had UV light and chamber for bacteria analysis

Page 18: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through
Page 19: Case StudiesCASE STUDY 2- BACTERIA •Clear Fork downstream from Zoo Creek is sampled monthly for bacteria •Occasional uptick in bacteria •Outfalls typically have flow through

RESULTS

• Break in sanitary line just past

lateral connection

• Water Department repaired break

• Outfalls are optical brightener free