case analysis rolls royce vs geely

9
AKHIL RAJ 9809854334 PRESENTED BY,

Post on 11-Sep-2014

492 views

Category:

Business


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Analysis of the case with Rolls-Royce and Geely with effect to Trade mark act.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

AKHIL RAJ9809854334

PRESENTED BY,

Page 2: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

ROLLS-ROYCE

VS

GEELY

Page 3: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

ROLLS-ROYCE

Famous Car maker company

Started in 1886

Also known as “Royal car makers”

High cost luxurious car Manufacturers

Great brand image

Page 4: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

GEELY EXCELLENCE

Famous Car maker company

Started in 1886

Also known as “Royal car makers”

High cost luxurious car Manufacturers

Great brand image

Page 5: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

The case starts when a Chinese car maker company, Geely launched a car also looks like Rolls

Royce. So They sue against Geely over the similarities between its Geely GE model and the Rolls-Royce

Phantom.

Geely GE is a car just similar to Rolls-Royce Phantom in its looks and overall design.

Geely is a substandard company when compared to Rolls-Royce

ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM GEELY GE

Rolls-Royce Motor Cars is very protective of its brand image and takes this case seriously to file a

case over the chinese car maker company Geely. Geely launches their mode Geely GE with the similar looks

and features of Rolls-Royce Phantom. Geely costs only 1/8th of Phantom.

ABOUT THE CASE

BUILT: Sussex, England

PRICE: £250,000

BUILT: Shanghai, China

PRICE: £30,000

Page 6: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

• The Trade Marks Act 1994 states that "a person infringes a registered trade mark if he uses in

the course of trade a sign which is identical with the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are

identical with those for which it is registered" (section 10(1) of the Act). A person may also infringe a

registered trade mark where the sign is similar and the goods or services are similar to those for which

the mark is registered and there is a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public as a result (section

10(2)).

• A trademark can be a Name, Word, Phrase, Logo, Symbol, Design, Image, Sound, Shape,

Signature or any combination of these elements.

Page 7: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

The grille, the Flying Lady mascot, also known as the Spirit of Ecstasy, and the Rolls-Royce name

and initials are specifically protected.

With its £250,000 price-tag, the original Rolls-Royce Phantom has always been the preserve of the

privileged few.

But costing just £30,000, the GE, which stands for Geely Excellence, appears to offer a ‘luxurious mobile

palace’ on a much tighter budget.

Page 8: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

VERDICT

The session court in England rejected Geely’s appeal against their conviction in the

case, 2009

Geely is sentenced to fine £ 10,00,000 by the lower court.

The court rejected the production of Geely GE.

Geely has appealed against the verdict. The case was going on in the court.

Page 9: Case analysis   rolls royce vs geely

THANK YOU