cartography of research on hate speech discourses

15
Cartography of research on hate speech discourses (misogyny) in the Spanish Manosphere (2019-2021) Prof. Charo LACALLE Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona [email protected] 1

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jul-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Cartography of research on hate speech discourses (misogyny) in the Spanish

Manosphere (2019-2021)

Prof. Charo LACALLEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona

[email protected]

1

Page 2: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Premises

• The Spanish feminist movement use to lack institutional ties and visibility

• Two interrelated events in 2018 changed the Spanish feminism movement history:

• The 8th March 2018 women’s strike• The court sentence -in April 2018- to “La

Manada” [The Wolfpack]

2

Page 3: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Social impact

“La Manada” case gave such visibility to the Spanish feminist movement to the extend of positioning itself as a political subject (Calvo, Díez Garrido & Bandera López, 2020).

• The massive social response led the youngest generations to disconnect feminism from its institutional side, identifying it as a political movement and as organised activism (Larrondo, Morales Gras & Obegozo Terradillos, 2019).

3

Page 4: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Political impact• The strike and “La Manada”’s case lead the

centre-right and right parties to reframe their gender discourses (Campillo, 2019)• President Pedro Sánchez• Appointed a majority female cabinet • Created Ministry of Equality • Carried out a bunch of legislative measures

related to paternity leave, childhood education, etc.• Allocated a budget for a State Pact against

Gender Violence

• In 2021, a Protocol to combat online hate speech was launched

4

Page 5: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Spanish research on online misogyny• The main body of the research focalizes on

social networks, particularly in Twitter• Matamoros Fernández & Farkas, 2019 criticizes

“The lack of platform diversity”

• Why Twitter?• High participation of political and institutional

actors • Massive & quickly dissemination of messages

through retweets and mentions• Greater accessibility of data

“The very nature of Twitter encourages users to have public conversations and share their thoughts with others” (https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2018/03/online-violence-against-women-chapter-1/)

5

Page 6: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

#YoNoTeCreo vs #YoSiTeCreo

• Nuñez Puente & Fernández Romero (2019) describe the struggle between online misogyny and feminist activism in Spain to compete for the discursive space on social media

• #YoNoTeCreo hashtag acted “as an example of agentive victimhood […] equating individual demands and collective struggles through visibility, affect and spectacularization”

• This two oppositional hashtags are a leading most of the feminist vs misogynistic confrontations since 2018 (e.g.: #Rocioyonotecreo, 2021)

6

Page 7: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Qualitative research

• Identifies and analyzes the most relevant characteristics of the Manosphere misogynistic discourses

• Samples too small to be representatives

• Molpeceres Anáiz & Filardo-Llamas (2020): 200 tweets (strike 8M March 2018, #Huelgafeminista and 100 Wolfpack sentencing, #laManada)

• Calvo, Díez Garrido & Bandera López (2020) 623 tweets from the organizers of 8M 2019 Madrid demonstration (@FeminismosMad)

• Villar-Aguilés & Pecourt Gracia (2021), 295 tweets generated around the 8M 2019 celebrations (#STOPfeminazis)

7

Page 8: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Quantitative research (content analysis)

• Increasing size of samples

• Quantitative• Nuñez Puente, D’Antonio Maceiras & Fernández Romero (2019), Twitter (8M,

2017), #8M & #NiUnaMenos, 20.000 tweets• Larrondo, Morales Gras & Obegozo Terradillos (2019), 290,989 tweets

published by 168,014 users of four hastags (#Cuéntalo, #HermanaYoSíTeCreo, #NoEstasSola y #YoSiTeCreo between April 26th and August 30th 2018)• Piñeiro-Otero & Martínez Rolán (2021) one year messages from 50 famous

Spanish women accounts; 511.587 tweets: 302.790 direct interactions and 208.797 mentions from is followers

• Quantitative + qualitative• Gutiérrez Almazor, Pando Canteli & Congosto (2020). 477,792 tweets April 26-

29, 2018, 3 days of concentrated activity by 154,764 users + 255 tweets (#Cuentalo)

8

Page 9: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Qualitative research (cultural studies)

• Analysing the accounts of LGBTQ+ (women) influencers

• Araüna, Tortajada, Willem (2019), 31 videos by four Spanish LGBTQ+ influencers (Dulceida, Yellow Mellow, Andy Asadaf, Devermut)• Villacampa Morales, Fedele & Aran-Ramspott (2021) 3 videos x 6 profiles of

Spanish LGBTQ+ influencers Dulceida and Yellow Mellow

• Scope and strategies of antifeminist cyber violence • Crosas Remon & Medina Bravo (2018), comments on the video Why I’m… a

feminist by the American YouTuber Laci Green (2014)

9

Page 10: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Qualitative research (semiotic-discursive analysis)

• Bernárdez Rodal, Requejo Rey & Franco (2020) explore hate speech on Instangram, 237 posts from VOX account

• Characteristics of VOX misogyny• Simplistic and Manichean argumentations

• Good/evil axis• Sensationalism of the messages

• “Attacks to manhood and traditions”• Redundancy

Díez-Garrido, Renedo FarpónCano-Orón (2021) evidence the high degree of misinformation in broadcast channels and the unofficial group of Telegram in Vox (2019 campaign)

10

VOX leader Santiago Abascal

Page 11: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

https://www.eljueves.es/vinetas/15-tipos-usuario-forocoches_1675

11

750.000 members

Page 12: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Vict

imism

(Bur

buja

.info

)

12

Page 13: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Manosphere’s misogynistic discourses

• Nuñez Puente, D’Antonio Maceiras & Fernández Romero (2019)

• “Lack of discussions or debates”• “Men are also abused by women”

• “Larrondo, Morales Gras & Obegozo Terradillos (2019)

• “Feminism is an oppressive movement against men” • “The ideological left behind feminisms makes a biased movement” • “The arbitrary position of feminists on different court cases demonstrates

their prejudice”

13

Page 14: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Concludingy remarks• Ambivalence of social networks, where popular

feminism and diversity coexists with extreme misogyny

• Anonymity increases visibility? / Anonymity enhances misogyny?

• The two preferred targets of hateful messages are immigrants and women (Plaza-del Arco, Molina-González, Ureña-López, Martín-Valdivia, 2020)

• Spanish feminism turn• Growing degree of polarization and politization

(Larrondo, Morales Gras & Obegozo Terradillos, 2019)• The backlashers operate a tight community whose

discourses are increasingly aligned with right-wing policies (Gutiérrez Almazor, Pando Canteli & Congosto, 2020; Lacalle, Martín & Etura,2021).

14

Page 15: Cartography of research on hate speech discourses

Grazie della vostra attenzione!!!

Charo LacalleUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona

[email protected]

15