Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings - standards ?· standards will therefore need to be interpreted…

Download Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings - standards ?· standards will therefore need to be interpreted…

Post on 28-Aug-2018




0 download

Embed Size (px)


<ul><li><p></p><p>Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists</p><p>Faculty of Clinical Radiology</p><p>Second edition</p></li><li><p>2 multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists, Second edition </p><p>RCR StandardsThe RCR, a registered charity, exists to advance the science and practice of radiology and oncology. </p><p>It undertakes to produce standards documents to provide guidance to radiologists and others involved in the delivery of radiological services with the aim of defining good practice, advancing the practice of radiology and improving the service for the benefit of patients. </p><p>The standards documents cover a wide range of topics. All have undergone an extensive consultation process to ensure a broad consensus, underpinned by published evidence, where applicable. Each is subject to review three years after publication or earlier, if appropriate. </p><p>The standards are not regulations governing practice, but attempt to define the aspects of radiological </p><p>services and care which promote the provision of a high-quality service to patients. </p><p>Specific cancer standards are issued separately by the Department of Health, the Welsh Assembly Government, the Scottish Executive, and the Northern Ireland Government (Appendix 1). These RCR standards will therefore need to be interpreted in the light of separate standards issued by the separate national governments of the United Kingdom. </p><p>The RCR has committed to reviewing all relevant publications in line with the recommendations of the Francis report and where appropriate applying the category of standard defined by Francis (fundamental, enhanced or developmental).1 This document contains standards that fall within the enhanced category.</p><p>Current standards documents Standards for Learning from Discrepancies Meetings</p><p>Standards for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), Second edition</p><p>Standards for patient confidentiality and PACS and RIS</p><p>Standards for the communication of critical, urgent and unexpected significant radiological findings, Second edition</p><p>Standards for patient consent particular to radiology, Second edition</p><p>Standards of practice and guidance for trauma radiology in severely injured patients</p><p>Standards and recommendations for the reporting and interpretation of imaging investigations by non-radiologist medically qualified practitioners and teleradiologists</p><p>Standards for the NPSA and RCR safety checklist for radiological interventions</p><p>Standards for the provision of teleradiology within the United Kingdom</p><p>Standards for the recording of second opinions or reviews in radiology departments</p><p>Standards for a results acknowledgement system</p><p>Standards for intravascular contrast agent administration to adult patients, Second edition</p><p>Standards for providing a 24-hour diagnostic radiology service</p><p>Standards for providing a 24-hour interventional radiology service</p><p>Standards for Self-assessment of Performance</p><p>Standards for the Reporting and Interpretation of Imaging investigations</p><p>Standards for Ultrasound Equipment</p><p>ContentsForeword 3</p><p>Recommended standards 4</p><p>1. Introduction 5</p><p>2. Time requirements 6</p><p>3. Quality control 7</p><p>4. Record keeping 9</p><p>5. Facilities 10 </p><p>6. Job planning and appraisal 10 </p><p>7. Education 11</p><p>8. Conclusion 11 </p><p>References 12</p><p>Appendix 1. National standards for cancer services in each of the four UK countries 13 </p><p>Appendix 2. MDTM discrepancy pro forma 14</p></li><li><p>Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists, Second edition</p><p>Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists, Second edition </p><p>Foreword</p><p>This document is an update of The Royal College of Radiologists Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists BFCR(05)9, which has now been withdrawn.</p><p>Since the first edition of this document was drafted in 2005, there has been significant recognition of the pivotal role that clinical radiologists play in the management of cancer patients. </p><p>This document therefore reflects the importance of the radiologist in cancer multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and outlines the requirements necessary for consultant radiologists and radiology departments to maximise the benefit to patients of imaging discussed at multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs).</p><p>MDTMs form an essential part of the quality assurance (QA) process within a radiology service and therefore this document should be read in conjunction with two other recent RCR publications: Standards for Learning from Discrepancies meetings and Quality assurance in radiology reporting: peer feedback.2,3</p><p>We would like to take this opportunity to thank Dr Mark Callaway, clinical radiologist, who led the review of this document with input from members of the Clinical Radiology Professional Support and Standards Board.</p><p>Dr Pete CavanaghVice-President, Clinical RadiologyThe Royal College of Radiologists</p></li><li><p>Recommended standards</p><p>Standard 1</p><p>Radiologists must attend two-thirds of the MDTMs personally (without relying on cover arrangements).</p><p>Standard 2</p><p>A minimum of two radiologists should be allocated to each MDTM (one radiologist to attend the meeting, but two radiologists designated for each site-specific meeting).</p><p>Standard 3</p><p>There should be prior review of all images by an individual with appropriate expertise and with sufficient time to provide an unhurried professional opinion for the MDTM. </p><p>Standard 4</p><p>All of the examinations (computed tomography [CT]/magnetic resonance [MR] and so on) discussed at MDTMs should have a supplementary report. It is possible that the majority of the reports may just say Reviewed at MDTM see primary report.</p><p>Standard 5</p><p>All images discussed at MDTMs should have a supplementary report, identifying that the images have been reviewed, the histological diagnosis, TNM staging and MDTM management plan.</p><p>Standard 6</p><p>Major differences of opinion and discrepancies in the radiological reports should be recorded, particularly if they affect patient management, and should be presented at the local learning from discrepancies meeting (LDM) (see Appendix 2 for an MDTM discrepancy pro forma).</p><p>Standard 7</p><p>Discrepancies between the radiological opinion and the surgery/pathology reports should be recorded.</p><p>Standard 8</p><p>Adequate image projection facilities must be available, and agreed by the MDTM radiologist.</p><p>Standard 9</p><p>Images transmitted for video-conferencing must be of sufficient quality, acceptable to the MDTM radiologists.</p><p>Standard 10</p><p>Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) facilities, if available within the hospital, must be available within the MDTM room.</p><p>Standard 11</p><p>A radiology information system (RIS) or radiology management system (RMS) must be available within the MDTM room.</p><p>Standard 12</p><p>Where possible, the MDT co-ordinator should link their personal computer to the projection facilities to enable display of patient demographics and decisions made at the meeting to MDTM participants.</p><p>Standard 13</p><p>The role of the MDTM radiologist should be addressed in the appraisal process.4</p><p>Standard 14</p><p>Where used, 360 appraisal should involve other MDTM members.</p><p>Standard 15</p><p>From time to time other radiologists should attend the MDTMs in addition to the MDTM radiologists. Their attendance should be recorded. This should be agreed with the radiology clinical director.</p><p>4 multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists, Second edition </p></li><li><p>Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists, Second edition</p><p>Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists, Second edition </p><p>1. IntroductionMultidisciplinary team (MDT) and clinico-radiology meetings are well established as a core component of medical care, and are mandatory within the NHS for hospitals providing cancer services. Highly specialised modern medicine requires a team of doctors and staff to manage patients effectively. MDTs are now becoming part of non-cancer specialties such as orthopaedics, rheumatology, chest diseases and inflammatory bowel disease. Although this is an example of quality care, this document focuses on the use of MDTMs in cancer care. Each MDT is responsible for all cancers within its specialty, must fulfil predetermined quality criteria and is subject to peer review on a regular basis. Each MDT has to meet regularly at an MDTM, the frequency of which varies depending on the incidence of the malignancies for which it is responsible. National standards for cancer services have been developed in each of the four UK countries (Appendix 1).</p><p>Guidelines</p><p>Guidelines for referral to the MDT for cancers and suspected cancers from non-MDT members need to be agreed within each trust so that decisions about these patients can be recorded at the MDTM. </p><p>Membership of MDTMs</p><p>The MDTMs have specific membership requirements for all relevant medical and non-medical groups. Radiologists are considered core members of MDTMs. All core members are required to show a personal commitment to attending the MDTM. They are required to attend two-thirds of the MDTMs and, for radiology, a named lead radiologist and a deputy are required and should provide cross-cover. The presence of both a radiologist and a pathologist has been mandated to ensure that the meeting is quorate. While MDTMs have been shown to have a positive effect on patient care, they also have a significant impact on consultant radiologist workload,5 and on radiology departments generally. There is a requirement for interventional radiology to be represented as a specialty at some MDTMs.</p><p>Another core member of the MDT is the MDT co-ordinator. A significant number of operational tasks are delegated directly to the co-ordinator, or their designated deputy, to enable the MDTMs to function efficiently. If the MDT is of sufficient size, there may be provision for an MDTM secretary in addition to the co-ordinator.6 Where possible, the radiology department should make use of these resources. </p><p>Principle issues for radiology involvement in MDTMs</p><p>The standards set forth in this document outline the requirements for consultant radiologists and radiology departments to maximise the benefit to patients of imaging discussed at MDTMs. They provide suggestions for performance targets and audit. The guidelines also suggest mechanisms for the recording of outcomes and how these can feed in to LDMs where necessary.2</p><p>While designed specifically to apply to cancer MDTMs, some of the recommendations will also be applicable to other clinico-radiological meetings. </p><p>The principal issues for radiology involvement in MDTMs are broadly divisible into five topics:</p><p> Time requirements </p><p> Quality control </p><p> Record keeping </p><p> Facilities </p><p> Job planning and appraisal.</p></li><li><p>6 multidisciplinary team meetings standards for clinical radiologists, Second edition </p><p>2. Time requirements The time commitment required from a consultant radiologist in providing useful input into an MDTM depends on the frequency of the meetings, their duration, the number of patients to be discussed and the complexity of the cases, and is often underestimated.5 The frequency of the meetings, for example, weekly or fortnightly, should be agreed with the lead radiologist and may only be increased after appropriate discussion with them and the clinical director of the radiology department.</p><p>The following aspects of time requirements need to be considered.</p><p>Attendance</p><p>Radiologists are core members of cancer MDTMs as per the National cancer peer review measures (Appendix 1).7 All core members are required to show a personal commitment to attending two out of three of the MDTMs themselves (not relying on cover arrangements to achieve this). Attendance time, recorded as a direct clinical care (DCC) session, should form part of the weekly job plan of all the radiologists who attend the MDTM.8</p><p>There should be a minimum of two radiologists per MDTM to provide continuous support. Recruitment based on special interests in radiology is normal for radiology job plans.8 In addition to attendance at the meetings, time should be made available as DCC in the radiologists job plans for reviewing images in advance of the meeting and for carrying out tasks resulting from decisions taken at the meeting, such as arranging biopsies or preparing MDTM supplementary reports. The volume of primary referral/reporting workload from the oncologists, surgeons and physicians, and core </p><p>members in a particular MDTM will define whether more than two radiologists are required. </p><p>MDTM supplementary reports</p><p>The initial diagnostic investigation may have been performed when the cancer was not known, and hence maybe reported by a colleague who does not attend the particular MDTM. However, once the case is discussed at the MDTM, the MDTM radiologist reviewing the images in the light of diagnosis of cancer must include an MDTM supplementary radiology report. The supplementary report should include, where applicable, the histology (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], adenocarcinoma [adenoCA] and so on), TNM stage, defined as the extent of the primary tumour, the absence or presence and extent of regional lymph node metastasis and the absence or presence of distant metastasis,9 as decided by the MDT, and plan for the patient management (for example, surgery with curative intent, palliative chemoradiotherapy and so on). Supplementary reports by the MDTM radiologist provide the most up-to-date information on imaging and are useful in keeping any doctor involved in the future care of the patient updated. The supplementary report also helps the radiologist who may report the post-treatment imaging. </p><p>Primary reporting allocation</p><p>Radiologists attending the MDTMs should also be responsible for providing the primary report for the majority of cases discussed at the MDTM, particularly the outpatient staging investigations and the post-treatment follow-up investigations. (The volume of investigations requested by the oncologists, surgeons and physicians, who are core members in the MDTMs, can easily be identified from the radiology </p><p>information system [RIS]. This should allow radiology managers to plan the number of radiology reporting sessions for the two MDTM radiologists.) Primary reporting of scans by special interest radiologists is a very important quality feature as radiologists reporting investigations are familiar with how these patients are managed and the team managing them. They can easily alert the team to any unexpected or significant findings. They can organise the next radiology investigation and can communicate directly with the cancer care nurse (CCN). This is also a requirement for the peer review measures.7 If a scan has been reported by one of the MDTM radiologists, they should display and discuss the images themselves at the MDTM. This provides an opportunity for them to get feedback, which is important for the overall quality of services.3</p><p>Duration of meetings</p><p>Since all patients wi...</p></li></ul>