canadian agricultural partnership final report...

Instructions

1. This Final Report Questionnaire must be submitted and approved by OSCIA to receive your final

payment.

2. Verify you have the proper Final Report Questionnaire for your project. This Final Report

Questionnaire is for: Water Wells (Producers) [Category Code: ESIM-PD-L]

3. Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).

Purpose

The purpose of this Final Report Questionnaire is to identify the results and impact of project activities

completed, as well as client satisfaction, related to Canadian Agricultural Partnership cost-share funding for

producers. Responses will not impact your final claim; however, to receive funding under the Canadian

Agricultural Partnership, this Final Report Questionnaire must be completed.

Contact & Project Details

Final Report Questionnaire

1. What activities did you complete for this project? (Select all that apply) *

Name of Business/Organization * Project Number *

Your Name *

Primary Project Contact Name (If different than your name)

Sealing and capping of old water wells no longer in use (decommissioning)

Upgrades to existing water wells

Upgrading/maintenance of sanitary seal

Annular seal

Replace caps

This question is continued on page 2

Canadian Agricultural Partnership Final Report Questionnaire (Producers)

ESIM-PD-L 2.0 of 6

2. Prior to completing your projects, how many of the following types of water

wells on your property required capping or sealing and were not suitable for

upgrade or use? (Select all the apply) *

3. How many water wells were capped and sealed (decommissioned) as a

result of your project? (Select all the apply) *

4. Prior to completing your project, did any of the following water wells on your

property require upgrading to improve the water source used for your farm

operation? (Select all the apply) *

Flow-control for an artesian well

Installation of anti-backflow protection

Grading and mounding to redirect surface flow away from the well

Extending external casing

Installation of pitless adapters

Bored or dug water well wells

Sand point water well wells

Drilled water well wells








ESIM-PD-L 2.0 of 6

5. As a result of this project, how many water wells were upgraded to improve

the water source used for your farm operation? (Select all the apply) *

6. Is this the first water well you have upgraded on your farm property? *

Yes

No

If no, how were other water well upgrades completed? (Select all that apply)

With support received from previous cost-share funding

programs wells

Financed by farm business (no cost-share) wells

7. As a result of the project, how likely are the following changes to occur on

your farm operation over the next five years? *

Potential Change

1

Unl ikely

This change could occur at some time but is improbable

2

Possib le

This change might occur at

some time

3

L ikely

This change w ill probably

occur

4

Almost certain

This change is expected to

occur

a) Reduced risks to ground waterquality

b ) Reduced impact from extreme weather events e.g. excess water, water shortages, high or low temperatures, high winds

c) Improved productivity of farmoperation (e.g. more consistentand secure water source forlivestock, crop production, etc.)





ESIM-PD-L 2.0 of 6

Environmental Farm Plan (EFP)

8. Did your project address a risk identified in your EFP Action Plan? *

9. What risk area did your project help you address from your EFP Action Plan?

*

10. Estimate the percentage of actions identified in your EFP Action Plan that

you have implemented (with or without cost-share funding assistance)? *

11. Did you encounter any barriers to completing this project? *

SELECT ALL BARRIERS THAT APPLY

Yes No

If yes, indicate the change in risk rating expected as a result of completing this project:

Moving from a 1 rating to a 3 rating Moving from a 1 rating to a 4 rating

Moving from a 2 rating to a 3 rating Moving from a 2 rating to a 4 rating

Moving from a 3 rating to a 4 rating

Fourth Edition Workbook, specify Worksheet # and Question #

0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%

Yes (Indicate Below) No (Skip to Question 12)

Approval timelines (e.g. timing of approval was different than expected)

Priority/process change (e.g. changes in business priorities/processes impacted the

project)

Expertise (e.g. challenges accessing technical assistance to plan project solutions)

Financial constraints (e.g. lack of funds or cost increases)

This question is continued on page 7 This question is continued on page 5


ESIM-PD-L 2.0 of 6

Service Experience

12. Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following

statements. *

1. Strongly

Disagree2. Disagree

3. Neither

Agree nor

Disagree

4. Agree5. Strongly

Agree

a. Once this project was approved, I received allthe information needed to proceed to the nextstep of the project.

b. The claim forms were easy to understandand complete.

c. I was able to reach appropriate OSCIA staffwithout difficulty.

d. OSCIA staff were knowledgeable.

e. I received consistent information from OSCIAstaff.

f. OSCIA staff were courteous.

13. Overall, how satisfied were you with the amount of time it took to get the

service that you required? *

1. Very Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied3. Neither Satisfied Nor

Dissatisfied 4. Satisfied 5. Very Satisfied

Labour (e.g. insufficient labour to complete project, challenges finding qualified

contractors)

Technical (e.g. mechanical, electrical, computer systems, automation, equipment)

Time (e.g. unable to meet time requirements, ill-timed, scheduling issues)

Uncontrollable circumstances (e.g. dependency on outside sources not met, weather,

vendors, suppliers)

Other (Specify)


ESIM-PD-L 2.0 of 6

14. Overall, how satisfied were you with the service you received while

implementing this project? *

1. Very Dissatisfied 2. Dissatisfied3. Neither Satisfied Nor

Dissatisfied 4. Satisfied 5. Very Satisfied

15. To what extent did the availability of funding assistance influence your

decision to undertake this project? *

1. Not At All 2. To a Small Extent 3. To a Moderate Extent 4. To a Great Extent

16. Provide any other comments you would like to share about your

experience related to Canadian Agricultural Partnership cost-share

funding for producers.

Submission Instructions

Review your answers and email the completed Final Report Questionnaire to

[email protected].


ESIM-PD-L 2.0 of 6

mailto:[email protected]

canadian agricultural partnership final report...

Documents